Incidence and Mortality of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Patients With Burns: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Early Autocalibrated Arterial Waveform Analysis for the Management of Burn Shock-A Cohort Study

Adequate fluid therapy is crucial for resuscitation after major burns. To adapt this to individual patient demands, standard is adjustment of volume to laboratory parameters and values of enhanced hemodynamic monitoring. To implement calibrated parameters, patients must have reached the intensive care unit (ICU). The aim of this study was, to evaluate the use of an auto-calibrated enhanced hemodynamic monitoring device to improve fluid management before admission to ICU. We used PulsioflexProAqt® (Getinge) during initial treatment and burn shock resuscitation. Analysis was performed regarding time of measurement, volume management, organ dysfunction, and mortality. We conducted a monocentre, prospective cohort study of 20 severely burned patients, >20% total body surface area (TBSA), receiving monitoring immediately after admission. We compared to 57 patients, matched in terms of TBSA, age, sex, and existence of inhalation injury out of a retrospective control group, who received standard care. Hemodynamic measurement with autocalibrated monitoring started significantly earlier: 3.75(2.67-6.0) hours (h) after trauma in the study group versus 13.6(8.1-17.5) h in the control group (P < .001). Study group received less fluid after 6 h: 1.7(1.2-2.2) versus 2.3(1.6-2.8) ml/TBSA%/kg, P = .043 and 12 h: 3.0(2.5-4.0) versus 4.2(3.1-5.0) ml/TBSA%/kg, P = .047. Dosage of norepinephrine was higher after 18 h in the study group: 0.20(0.12-0.3) versus 0.08(0.02-0.18) µg/kg/min, P = .014. The study group showed no adult respiratory distress syndrome versus 21% in the control group, P = .031. There was no difference in other organ failures, organ replacement therapy, and mortality. The use of auto-calibrated enhanced hemodynamic monitoring is a fast and feasible way to guide early fluid therapy after burn trauma. It reduces the time to reach information about patient's volume capacity. Management of fluid application changed to a more restrictive fluid use in the early period of burn shock and led to a reduction of pulmonary complications.

A deep dive into burn-mediated ARDS severity assessment: a retrospective study on hematological markers

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a critical form of Acute Lung Injury (ALI), challenging clinical diagnosis and severity assessment. This study evaluates the potential utility of various hematological markers in burn-mediated ARDS, including Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Mean Platelet Volume (MPV), MPV-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (MPVLR), Platelet count, and Platelet Distribution Width (PDW). Employing a retrospective analysis of data collected over 12 years, this study focuses on the relationship between these hematological markers and ARDS diagnosis and severity in hospitalized patients. The study establishes NLR as a reliable systemic inflammation marker associated with ARDS severity. Elevated MPV and MPVLR also emerged as significant markers correlating with adverse outcomes. These findings suggest these economical, routinely measured markers can enhance traditional clinical criteria, offering a more objective approach to ARDS diagnosis and severity assessment. Hematological markers such as NLR, MPV, MPVLR, Platelet count, and PDW could be invaluable in clinical settings for diagnosing and assessing ARDS severity. They offer a cost-effective, accessible means to improve diagnostic accuracy and patient stratification in ARDS. However, further prospective studies are necessary to confirm these findings and investigate their integration with other diagnostic tools in diverse clinical settings.

A Murine Model of Vesicant-Induced Acute Lung Injury

Burn injuries including those caused by chemicals can result in systemic effects and acute lung injury (ALI). Cutaneous exposure to Lewisite, a warfare and chemical burn agent, also causes ALI. To overcome the limitations in conducting direct research on Lewisite-induced ALI in a laboratory setting, an animal model was developed using phenylarsine oxide (PAO) as a surrogate for Lewisite. Due to lack of a reliable animal model mimicking the effects of such exposures, development of effective therapies to treat such injuries is challenging. We demonstrated that a single cutaneous exposure to PAO resulted in disruption of the alveolar-capillary barrier as evidenced by elevated protein levels in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF). BALF supernatant of PAO-exposed animals had increased levels of high mobility group box 1, a damage associated molecular pattern molecule. Arterial blood-gas measurements showed decreased pH, increased PaCO2, and decreased partial pressure of arterial O2, indicative of respiratory acidosis, hypercapnia, and hypoxemia. Increased protein levels of interleukin (IL)-6, CXCL-1, CXCL-2, CXCL-5, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor, CXCL-10, leukemia inhibitory factor, leptin, IL-18, CCL-2, CCL-3, and CCL-7 were observed in the lung of PAO-exposed mice. Further, vascular endothelial growth factor levels were reduced in the lung. Pulmonary function evaluated using a flexiVent showed a downward shift in the pressure-volume loop, decreases in static compliance and inspiratory capacity, increases in respiratory elastance and tissue elastance. These changes are consistent with an ALI phenotype. These results demonstrate that cutaneous PAO exposure leads to ALI and that the model can be used as an effective surrogate to investigate vesicant-induced ALI. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: This study presents a robust model for studying ALI resulting from cutaneous exposure to PAO, a surrogate for the toxic vesicating agent Lewisite. The findings in this study mimic the effects of cutaneous Lewisite exposure, providing a reliable model for investigating mechanisms underlying toxicity. The model can also be used to develop medical countermeasures to mitigate ALI associated with cutaneous Lewisite exposure.

Global prevalence of COVID-19-induced acute respiratory distress syndrome: systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is potentially a fatal form of respiratory failure among COVID-19 patients. Globally, there are inconsistent findings regarding ARDS among COVID-19 patients. Therefore, this study aimed to estimate the pooled prevalence of COVID-19-induced ARDS among COVID-19 patients worldwide.

METHODS

To retrieve relevant studies, the authors searched Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Google, and Google Scholar using a combination of search terms. The search was conducted for articles published from December 2019 to September 2022. Articles were searched and screened by title (ti), abstract (ab), and full-text (ft) by two reviewers independently. The quality of each included article was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Assessment Scale. Data were entered into Microsoft Word and exported to Stata version 14 for analysis. Heterogeneity was detected using the Cochrane Q statistics and I-square (I2). Then the sources of variations were identified by subgroup and meta-regression analysis. A random effect meta-analysis model was used. The publication bias was detected using the graphic asymmetry test of the funnel plot and/or Egger's test (p value < 0.05). To treat the potential publication bias, trim and fill analysis were computed. The protocol has been registered in an international database, the Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) with reference number: CRD42023438277.

RESULTS

A total of 794 studies worldwide were screened for their eligibility. Of these 11 studies with 2845 participants were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The overall pooled prevalence of COVID-19-induced ARDS in the world was found to be 32.2% (95%CI = 27.70-41.73%), I2 = 97.3%, and p value < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The pooled prevalence of COVID-19-induced ARDS was found to be high. The virus remains a global burden because its genetic causes are constantly changing or it mutated throughout the pandemic to emerge a new strain of infection. Therefore, interventions such as massive vaccination, early case detection, screening, isolation, and treatment of the cases need to be implemented to tackle its severity.