A Patients' Perspective Towards the Injection Devices for Humira® and Imraldi® in a Nationwide Switching Program

Patient Satisfaction and Experience with CT-P17 Following Transition from Reference Adalimumab or Another Adalimumab Biosimilar: Results from the Real-World YU-MATTER Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Biosimilars are cost-effective alternatives to reference products for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD), but patient beliefs can affect adherence to the transition. This study aimed to explore patient experience and satisfaction after switching to CT-P17, a high-concentration (100 mg/mL), citrate-free adalimumab biosimilar.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This observational, multicenter, prospective French study included adult patients with IBD or CIRD who switched to CT-P17 from reference adalimumab (R-ADA; 100 mg/mL) or a low-concentration adalimumab biosimilar (ADA-BioS; 50 mg/mL). Patients completed online questionnaires to assess treatment perceptions, satisfaction, and tolerance at study inclusion (under previous treatment) and over 3 months of CT-P17 treatment. The primary criterion was overall patient satisfaction, which was assessed with the question, "What is your global satisfaction with the CT-P17 injection?", using a 7-point Likert scale. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with increased treatment satisfaction after switching to CT-P17.

RESULTS

The total analysis population included 232 patients (IBD 72.0%, CIRD 28.0%). Median patient age was 57.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 46.0-63.0), 50.4% were men, and median disease duration was 9 years (IQR 5-16). Approximately half of the cohort (51.2%) switched to CT-P17 from an ADA-BioS (including 19.4% from an ADA-BioS with citrate) and half (48.7%) from R-ADA. The proportion of patients who were satisfied with treatment was stable between baseline (under previous treatment) and 3 months (under CT-P17). More patients reported increased satisfaction after switching to CT-P17 from an ADA-BioS (22.7% vs 8.0% when switching from R-ADA; p = 0.002), or from an ADA-BioS containing citrate (28.9% vs 12.3% when switching from a citrate-free ADA-BioS; p = 0.008). Independent prognostic factors for increased satisfaction were previous treatment with an ADA-BioS (odds ratio [OR] 2.88 [95% confidence interval 1.17-7.08]; p = 0.021) and pain at the injection site under previous treatment (OR 1.26 [1.08-1.47]; p = 0.004). Significantly fewer patients reported pain, redness, itching, and hematoma after 3 months of CT-P17 treatment versus baseline (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients had stable or increased treatment satisfaction after switching from R-ADA or an ADA-BioS to CT-P17. In particular, switching to CT-P17 from a low-concentration ADA-BioS or an ADA-BioS containing citrate was associated with increased patient satisfaction. An improvement in overall tolerance with CT-P17 versus previous adalimumab treatment was also reported.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05427942, registered June 22, 2022.

International Survey to Evaluate Current Options for Subcutaneous Injection of Methotrexate (MTX) and a New Button-Free MTX Autoinjector

Purpose

Prefilled syringes (PFS) and various types of pens are available for subcutaneous injection of methotrexate (MTX) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis or moderate to severe psoriasis. A new MTX pen with modernized button-free autoinjection technology was developed as a successor to a button-activated pen (metoject®/metex® PEN). To assess the needs of users and the relevance of features of the new MTX autoinjector an international online survey was performed.

Methods

A structured questionnaire was distributed to physicians, nurses and patients in Germany, France, and the United Kingdom. Participants received illustrations and information about features of the new MTX autoinjector.

Results

In total, 189 rheumatologists, 111 dermatologists, 90 nurses, and 180 patients answered the questions. Specific reasons for a preference for the use of MTX pens over PFS could predominantly be assigned to the categories "dosing/administration" and "ease of use". The first impression of the new MTX autoinjector was positive in 82% of physicians, 87% of nurses, and 76% of patients, respectively. The four most important features of the new MTX autoinjector were 2-step autoinjector mechanism (receiving a mean 14.1 to 18.1 chips of a total of 100 chips), small injection volume (9.7 to 11.7 chips), 10 different doses for dose flexibility (8.0 to 13.2 chips), and short injection time below 5 seconds (8.5 to 11.1 chips).

Conclusion

Arguments for the use of MTX pens as opposed to PFS predominantly refer to dosing/administration and ease of use. The new button-free MTX autoinjector combines a number of advantageous features identified by the international survey.

Patients' Perceptions of Biosimilars: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

To systematically summarize and evaluate the findings of existing studies about patients' perceptions of biosimilars by assessing their attitudes and knowledge.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of published studies concerning patients' perceptions of biosimilars, using databases of China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SinoMed, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers screened a total of 2197 Chinese or English papers published between 1 January 2018, and 1 October 2022. We assessed the quality of the included studies by applying the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies were included in the review, with the majority originating from Europe (n = 22) and North America (n = 10). Of these studies, 37 were cross-sectional quantitative studies, three were quasi-experimental studies, and the remaining three were qualitative studies based on semi-structured interviews. The sample sizes of the included studies ranged from 9 to 6554 patients. Twenty-two out of 31 studies investigating patients' acceptance of biosimilars found that most participants expressed satisfaction with treatment using biosimilars. However, doubts about the clinical effects and regulatory approval pathway could negatively influence patients' attitudes. The majority of patients understood the economic advantages of biosimilars; however, some incorrectly connected lower prices with lower quality. Patients generally lacked knowledge about biosimilars. There were 6-51% of participants who were familiar with biosimilars, and 25-58% thought they did not know enough about biosimilars. Physicians, pharmacists, medicines agencies, academia, and patient associations were identified as the main sources of information on biosimilars for patients. Healthcare providers not informing or advising patients about switching may hinder patients from acquiring enough knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients expressed satisfaction with treatment using biosimilars, but limited knowledge continued to impede their perceptions. Doubts about the clinical effects and regulatory approval pathway were identified as major factors that negatively influenced patients' attitudes towards biosimilars, while the impact of a price advantage was mixed. It is essential to maintain a focus on educating healthcare professionals about biosimilars, including their clinical outcomes and the regulatory pathway, which equips them to provide comprehensive and informed guidance to patients.

Navigating adalimumab biosimilars: an expert opinion

The patent expiry of Humira® in 2018 opened up the current European market to eight adalimumab biosimilars - (in alphabetical order) Amgevita®, Amsparity®, Hulio®, Hukyndra®, Hyrimoz®, Idacio®, Imraldi® and Yuflyma® - for the treatment of various immune and inflammatory conditions. Amjevita, Hadlima®, Hyrimoz and Yuflyma have recently become available in the USA, with others expected to reach this market in 2023 as the US patent protection for Humira ends. Although adalimumab biosimilars demonstrate efficacy, safety and immunogenicity similar to the originator, they may differ in product excipient(s) and preservatives, along with their device type(s). Physicians may find it both difficult and time consuming to navigate their way among the array of available adalimumab biosimilars when they need to make a treatment decision. This article explores the characteristics of various adalimumab biosimilars to help clinicians navigate the various options available across Europe and the USA. In addition to drug selection, effective patient-physician communication is needed to nurture realistic patient expectations and minimise potential nocebo effects when prescribing biosimilars.

Stability of Monoclonal Antibodies as Solid Formulation for Auto-Injectors: A Pilot Study

Drug adherence is a significant medical issue, often responsible for sub-optimal outcomes during the treatment of chronic diseases such as rheumatoid or psoriatic arthritis. Monoclonal antibodies (which are exclusively given parenterally) have been proven to be an effective treatment in these cases. The use of auto-injectors is an effective strategy to improve drug adherence in parenteral treatments since these pen-like devices offer less discomfort and increased user-friendliness over conventional syringe-based delivery. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of including a monoclonal antibody as a solid formulation inside an auto-injector pen. Specifically, the objective was to evaluate the drug stability after a concentration (to reduce the amount of solvent and space needed) and freeze-drying procedure. A preliminary screening of excipients to improve stability was also performed. The nano-DSC results showed that mannitol improved the stability of the concentrated, freeze-dried antibody in comparison to its counterpart without it. However, a small instability of the CH2 domain was still found for mannitol samples, which will warrant further investigation. The present results serve as a stepping stone towards advancing future drug delivery systems that will ultimately improve the patient experience and associated drug adherence.

Assessment of real-life patient handling experience of AVT02 administered subcutaneously via autoinjector in patients with moderate to severe active rheumatoid arthritis: an open-label, single-arm clinical trial, then an extension phase of AVT02 administered with a prefilled syringe

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the ability of patients, naïve to adalimumab treatment and self-injection with an autoinjector (AI), to successfully self-administer AVT02, an adalimumab biosimilar, using a custom, ergonomic AI (Alvotech hf., Reykjavik, Iceland).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a single-arm, open-label study, consisting of an 8-week active period and 48-week extension phase. Patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) self-administered 40 mg AVT02 subcutaneously via AI in the active period, followed by prefilled syringe in the extension phase. The primary endpoint was the percentage of successful self-injections up to Week 8. Usability and robustness of the AI were evaluated in the active period; safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity data were assessed throughout the study.

RESULTS

The AI success rate was 100%. No handling events were noted up to Week 8. Both Ctrough measurements and immunogenicity profile were in line with expectations from previous studies, with no unexpected safety signals.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that AVT02-AI can be successfully and reliably used for repeated self-injections of AVT02 by moderate to severe RA patients, despite no previous experience of adalimumab self-administration. The extension phase provides long-term efficacy and safety data for AVT02 in RA.

STUDY IDENTIFIER

NCT04224194.

A multicenter, randomized, open-label, 2-arm parallel study to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety and tolerability of AVT02 administered subcutaneously via prefilled syringe or autoinjector in healthy adults

BACKGROUND

AVT02 is an adalimumab biosimilar, with bioequivalence previously established along with clinical similarity. This study assessed the pharmacokinetic (PK) similarity of a single dose of 100 mg/mL AVT02 administered via prefilled syringe (PFS) or autoinjector (AI).

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

In this open-label, 2-arm, parallel-group study, healthy adults were randomized 1:1 to receive one 40 mg (100 mg/mL) dose of AVT02 subcutaneously via PFS (N = 102) or AI (N = 105). Primary PK parameters (Cmax, AUC0-t and AUC0-inf) were evaluated up to Day 64 of the study. Secondary PK parameters, safety, tolerability and immunogenicity were also assessed.

RESULTS

The 90% CIs for the ratio of geometric least squares means were contained within the pre-specified 80-125% equivalence margins for the primary PK parameters, demonstrating bioequivalence of AVT02 when administered by PFS or AI. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was comparable between the two groups, with a low frequency of injection site reactions observed. Immunogenicity profiles were also similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Bioequivalence was demonstrated for a single dose of AVT02 administered via PFS or AI. These results will help to increase availability of devices for patients, enabling treatment choice and flexibility.