Synergistic Combination of Linezolid and Fosfomycin Closing Each Other's Mutant Selection Window to Prevent Enterococcal Resistance

Synergistic properties of linezolid against Enterococcus spp. isolates: a systematic review from in vitro studies

PURPOSE

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) are a leading cause of hospital-acquired infections with limited therapeutic options. Combination of at least two antimicrobials is a possible strategy to obtain rapid and sustained bactericidal effects and overcome the emergence of resistance. We revised the literature on linezolid synergistic properties from in vitro studies to assess its activity in combination with molecules belonging to other antibiotic classes against Enterococcus spp.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature from three peer-reviewed databases including papers evaluating linezolid synergistic properties in vitro against Enterococcus spp. isolates.

RESULTS

We included 206 Enterococcus spp. isolates (92 E. faecalis, 90 E. faecium, 2 E. gallinarum, 3 E. casseliflavus, 19 Enterococcus spp.) from 24 studies. When an isolate was tested with different combinations, each combination was considered independently for further analysis. The most frequent interaction was indifferent effect (247/343, 72% of total interactions). The highest synergism rates were observed when linezolid was tested in combination with rifampin (10/49, 20.4% of interactions) and fosfomycin (16/84, 19.0%, of interactions). Antagonistic effect accounted for 7/343 (2.0%) of total interactions.

CONCLUSION

Our study reported overall limited synergistic in vitro properties of linezolid with other antibiotics when tested against Enterococcus spp. The clinical choice of linezolid in combination with other antibiotics should be guided by reasoned empiric therapy in the suspicion of a polymicrobial infection or targeted therapy on microbiological results, rather than on an intended synergistic effect of the linezolid-based combination.

Oral Antibiotics for Bacteremia and Infective Endocarditis: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives

Bacteremia and endocarditis are two clinical syndromes that, for decades, were managed exclusively with parenteral antimicrobials, irrespective of a given patient's clinical condition, causative pathogen, or its antibiotic susceptibility profile. This clinical approach, however, was based on low-quality data and outdated expert opinions. When a patient's condition has improved, gastrointestinal absorption is not compromised, and an oral antibiotic regimen reaching adequate serum concentrations is available, a switch to oral antibacterials can be applied. Although available evidence has reduced the timing of the oral switch in bacteremia to three days/until clinical improvement, there are only scarce data regarding less than 10-day intravenous antibiotic therapy in endocarditis. Many standard or studied oral antimicrobial dosages are smaller than the approved doses for parenteral administration, which is a risk factor for treatment failure; in addition, the gastrointestinal barrier may affect drug bioavailability, especially when the causative pathogen has a minimum inhibitory concentration that is close to the susceptibility breakpoint. A considerable number of patients infected by such near-breakpoint strains may not be potential candidates for oral step-down therapy to non-highly bioavailable antibiotics like beta-lactams; different breakpoints should be determined for this setting. This review will focus on summarizing findings about pathogen-specific tailoring of oral step-down therapy for bacteremia and endocarditis, but will also present laboratory and clinical data about antibiotics such as beta-lactams, linezolid, and fosfomycin that should be studied more in order to elucidate their role and optimal dosage in this context.

Antimicrobial resistance expansion in pathogens: a review of current mitigation strategies and advances towards innovative therapy

The escalating problem of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) proliferation in clinically important pathogens has become one of the biggest threats to human health and the global economy. Previous studies have estimated AMR-associated deaths and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) in many countries with a view to presenting a clearer picture of the global burden of AMR-related diseases. Recently, several novel strategies have been advanced to combat resistance spread. These include efflux activity inhibition, closing of mutant selection window (MSW), biofilm disruption, lytic bacteriophage particles, nanoantibiotics, engineered antimicrobial peptides, and the CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technique. The single or integrated deployment of these strategies has shown potentialities towards mitigating resistance and contributing to valuable therapeutic outcomes. Correspondingly, the new paradigm of personalized medicine demands innovative interventions such as improved and accurate point-of-care diagnosis and treatment to curtail AMR. The CRISPR-Cas system is a novel and highly promising nucleic acid detection and manipulating technology with the potential for application in the control of AMR. This review thus considers the specifics of some of the AMR-mitigating strategies, while noting their drawbacks, and discusses the advances in the CRISPR-based technology as an important point-of-care tool for tracking and curbing AMR in our fight against a looming 'post-antibiotic' era.

Antibacterial Activity of Surfactin and Synergistic Effect with Conventional Antibiotics Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Isolated from Patients with Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Introduction

The prevalence of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) is increasing, leading to a huge financial burden and human suffering. Furthermore, antibiotic resistance is an urgent problem in the realm of clinical practice. Antimicrobial peptides are an effective and feasible strategy for combating infections caused by drug-resistant bacteria. Therefore, we investigated the in vitro antimicrobial ability of the lipopeptide surfactin, either alone or in combination with conventional antibiotics, against the standard and clinical strains of Staphylococcus aureus, including methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), isolated from patients with DFUs.

Methods

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) and minimum bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of surfactin on the selected strains were evaluated by a microbroth dilution technique. The growth curves of the selected strains with and without surfactin were measured, and transmission electron microscopy was used to observe the structure of surfactin-treated bacterial cells. The biofilm inhibitory abilities of surfactin were assessed by crystal violet staining. The antimicrobial interactions between surfactin and conventional antibiotics were established using a checkerboard assay, as well as determining the mutant prevention concentration. The inhibitory effect of surfactin on penicillinase was tested by iodometry.

Results

The MIC and MBC values of surfactin ranged from 512 to 1024 µg/mL and 1024 to 2048 µg/mL, respectively. Moreover, surfactin significantly prevented the S. aureus biofilm formation and displayed limited toxicity on human red blood cells. The synergies between surfactin and ampicillin, oxacillin, and tetracycline against S. aureus were revealed. In vitro resistance was not readily produced by surfactin. The action of surfactin may be by disrupting bacterial cell membranes and inhibiting penicillinase.

Conclusion

Surfactin appears to be a potential option for the treatment of DFUs infected with MRSA, as it is capable of improving antimicrobial activities and can be used alone or in combination with conventional antibiotics to prevent or postpone the emergence of resistance.

In Vitro Pharmacodynamics and Bactericidal Mechanism of Fungal Defensin-Derived Peptides NZX and P2 against Streptococcus agalactiae

(1) Background: Based on the hazard of Streptococcus agalactiae to human and animal health and the increasing drug resistance, it is urgent to develop new antimicrobial agents with high bactericidal activity and low drug resistance against S. agalactiae. This study aims to investigate in vitro pharmacodynamics and bactericidal mechanism of fungal defensin-derived peptides NZX and P2 against S. agalactiae. (2) Methods: Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and mutant prevention concentration (MPC) were determined by broth dilution method and AGAR plate dilution method. Cell membrane integrity was determined by flow cytometer. Cell morphological changes were observed by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and transmission electron microscope (TEM). (3) Results: MIC values (NZX: 0.11 μM, P2: 0.91 μM) and MPC (NZX: 1.82 μM) showed their higher antibacterial activity and stronger inhibition ability of drug resistance mutation. The bactericidal mechanism was elucidated that P2 caused S. agalactiae ACCC 61733 cells to deform, bound to the cell wall, and perturbed cell membrane, resulting in K⁺ leakage, membrane hyperpolarization, ATP release, and reduced cell contents. Compared with P2, NZX focuses on the cell wall, and it bound to the cell wall causing cells boundary disappearance. (4) Conclusion: NZX and P2 are promising antimicrobial agents for streptococcicosis treatment.

Pharmacodynamics of Linezolid Plus Fosfomycin Against Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus faecium in a Hollow Fiber Infection Model

The optimal therapy for severe infections caused by vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) remains unclear, but the combination of linezolid and fosfomycin may be a good choice. The 24-h static-concentration time-kill study (SCTK) was used to preliminarily explore the pharmacodynamics of linezolid combined with fosfomycin against three clinical isolates. Subsequently, a hollow-fibre infection model (HFIM) was used for the first time to further investigate the pharmacodynamic activity of the co-administration regimen against selected isolates over 72 h. To further quantify the relationship between fosfomycin resistance and bacterial virulence in VREfm, the Galleria mellonella infection model and virulence genes expression experiments were also performed. The results of SCTK showed that the combination of linezolid and fosfomycin had additive effect on all strains. In the HFIM, the dosage regimen of linezolid (12 mg/L, steady-state concentration) combined with fosfomycin (8 g administered intravenously every 8 h as a 1 h infusion) not only produced a sustained bactericidal effect of 3∼4 log₁₀ CFU/mL over 72 h, but also completely eradicated the resistant subpopulations. The expression of virulence genes was down-regulated to at least 0.222-fold in fosfomycin-resistant strains compared with baseline isolate, while survival rates of G. mellonella was increased (G. mellonella survival ≥45% at 72 h). For severe infections caused by VREfm, neither linezolid nor fosfomycin monotherapy regimens inhibited amplification of the resistant subpopulations, and the development of fosfomycin resistance was at the expense of the virulence of VREfm. The combination of linezolid with fosfomycin produced a sustained bactericidal effect and completely eradicated the resistant subpopulations. Linezolid plus Fosfomycin is a promising combination for therapy of severe infections caused by VREfm.

Dose Optimization of Combined Linezolid and Fosfomycin against Enterococcus by Using an In Vitro Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Model

The rapid spread of antibiotic resistance among Enterococcus has prompted considerable interest in determining the dosage regimen of linezolid combined with fosfomycin. A checkerboard assay was employed to evaluate whether linezolid combined with fosfomycin had a synergistic effect on Enterococcus isolates from the hospital, including three drug-resistant strains (MIC of linezolid [MIC_LZD], ≥8 mg/L; MIC of fosfomycin [MIC_FOF], ≥256 mg/L). The in vitro static time-kill assay, dynamic pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD) model, and semimechanistic PK/PD model were used to explore and predict effective combined dosage regimens. The checkerboard assay and in vitro static time-kill assay demonstrated that linezolid combined with fosfomycin has a synergistic effect on drug-resistant and sensitive Enterococcus. In the in vitro PK/PD model, the dosage regimen of linezolid (8 mg/L or 12 mg/L, steady-state concentration) combined with fosfomycin (6 g or 8 g) via a 0.5-h infusion every 8 h effectively suppressed bacterial growth at 24 h with a 3 log₁₀ CFU/mL decrease compared with the initial inocula against two resistant and one sensitive Enterococcus isolates. The semimechanistic PK/PD model predicted that linezolid (more than 16 mg/L) combined with fosfomycin (6 g or 10 g) via a 0.5-h infusion every 8 h was required to achieve a 4 log₁₀ CFU/mL decrease at 24 h against Enterococcus isolates (MIC_LZD ≥ 8 mg/L and MIC_FOF ≥ 256 mg/L). According to the prediction of the semimechanical PK/PD model, the effect of the combination was driven by linezolid, with fosfomycin enhancing the effect. Our study is the first to explore the synergistic effects of these two drugs from a qualitative and quantitative perspective and provides a simulation tool for future studies.

IMPORTANCE In this study, we found that linezolid combined with fosfomycin could kill Enterococcus in vitro and that the administered dose was significantly lower after the combination treatment, which could reduce adverse effects and the development of drug resistance. The potential mechanism of the two-drug combination against Enterococcus was revealed from a quantitative perspective, which is an important step toward dose optimization in simulated humans. We hope that our research will help build a better relationship between clinicians and patients as we work together to address the challenges of antibiotic resistance in the 21st century.

Development and Validation of an HPLC-UV Method for Quantitation of Linezolid: Application to Resistance Study Using in vitro PK/PD Model

Background

Linezolid (LNZ), an oxazolidinone antibiotic, has 100% oral bioavailability and favorable activities against gram-positive pathogens. The in vitro PK/PD model was developed based on concentrations obtained with routine doses in humans can be used to guide dose optimization in the clinic.

Methods

In this study, we employed an in vitro PK/PD model to simulate the changes in the plasma concentration of linezolid in the human body against a clinical isolate of MRSA in vitro. A high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-UV method was applied to measure the concentration of linezolid. Bacterial samples were collected at different times from the central compartment for count.

Results

The chromatographic separation was carried out with an AichromBond-AQC18 column(250mm×4.6mm, 5μm), using a mobile phase of water with 0.1% formic acid:acetonitrile 70:30 (v/v), followed by detection at 254 nm, and a single detection run was completed within 10 min. The method was validated by estimating the precision and accuracy for the inter- and intra-day analyses in the concentration range of 0.25-32 mg/L. The method was linear over the investigated range of 0.125-32 mg/L, with all correlation coefficients R² = 0.9999. The intra-day and inter-day precisions were within 7.598%, and the method recovery ranged from 90.912% to 106.459%. In vitro PK/PD model, both the absorption and elimination of linezolid being simulated can be precisely controlled by computer. In the control group, the bacterial reached 7.9 Log10CFU/mL in the first 48h and maintained until the end, indicating that the colonies grew well in vitro PK/PD model. In the linezolid 600 mg q12h administration group, the colony decreased to 2.39 Log10CFU/mL at 24h, showing a good bactericidal effect; however, the colonies resumed growth to the initial level in 48h, indicating an emergence of resistance.

Conclusion

We successfully established an in vitro infection PK/PD model and developed an HPLC-UV method to determine linezolid concentration for resistance investigation. The results suggest that the 600 mg q12h dosing regimen may no longer be applicable and requires optimization.

Phloretin potentiates polymyxin E activity against gram-negative bacteria

AIMS

The spread of plasmid-mediated polymyxin resistance has jeopardized the use of polymyxin, the last defender that combats infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative pathogens.

MAIN METHODS

In this study, phloretin, as a monomeric compound extracted from natural plants, showed a good synergistic effect with polymyxin E against gram-negative bacteria, as evaluated by minimal inhibit concentration (MIC) assay and a series of assays, including growth curve, time-killing, and Western blot assays. A model of mice infected by Salmonella sp. stain HYM2 was established to further identify the synergistic effect of phloretin with polymyxin E.

KEY FINDINGS

The results suggested that phloretin had the potential ability to recover the antibacterial sensitivity of polymyxin E from 64 μg/mL to no more than 2 μg/mL in E. coli ZJ478 or in Salmonella sp. stain HYM2 with a 32-fold decrease. A series of strains, including mcr-1-positive and mcr-1-negative strains, were treated with a combination of phloretin and polymyxin E, and the fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) values were all found to be below 0.5. However, the combination of phloretin and polymyxin E did not lead to bacterial resistance. In vivo, the survival rate of infected mice reached nearly 80% with the combination treatment, and the cecal colony value also decreased significantly.

SIGNIFICANCE

All the above results indicated that phloretin is a potential polymyxin potentiator to combat gram-negative stains.