Development versus predation: Transcriptomic changes during the lifecycle of Myxococcus xanthus

Cell-cell transfer of adaptation traits benefits kin and actor in a cooperative microbe

Microbes face many physical, chemical, and biological insults from their environments. In response, cells adapt, but whether they do so cooperatively is poorly understood. Here, we use a model social bacterium, Myxococcus xanthus, to ask whether adapted traits are transferable to naïve kin. To do so we isolated cells adapted to detergent stresses and tested for trait transfer. In some cases, strain-mixing experiments increased sibling fitness by transferring adaptation traits. This cooperative behavior depended on a kin recognition system called outer membrane exchange (OME) because mutants defective in OME could not transfer adaptation traits. Strikingly, in mixed stressed populations, the transferred trait also benefited the adapted (actor) cells. This apparently occurred by alleviating a detergent-induced stress response in kin that otherwise killed actor cells. Additionally, this adaptation trait when transferred also conferred resistance against a lipoprotein toxin delivered to targeted kin. Based on these and other findings, we propose a model for stress adaptation and how OME in myxobacteria promotes cellular cooperation in response to environmental stresses.

The genetic basis of predation by myxobacteria

Myxobacteria (phylum Myxococcota) are abundant and virtually ubiquitous microbial predators. Facultatively multicellular organisms, they are able to form multicellular fruiting bodies and swarm across surfaces, cooperatively hunting for prey. Myxobacterial communities are able to kill a wide range of prey microbes, assimilating their biomass to fuel population growth. Their mechanism of predation is exobiotic - hydrolytic enzymes and toxic metabolites are secreted into the extracellular environment, killing and digesting prey cells from without. However, recent observations of single-cell predation and contact-dependent prey killing challenge the dogma of myxobacterial predation being obligately cooperative. Regardless of their predatory mechanisms, myxobacteria have a broad prey range, which includes Gram-negative bacteria, Gram-positive bacteria and fungi. Pangenome analyses have shown that their extremely large genomes are mainly composed of accessory genes, which are not shared by all members of their species. It seems that the diversity of accessory genes in different strains provides the breadth of activity required to prey upon such a smorgasbord of microbes, and also explains the considerable strain-to-strain variation in predatory efficiency against specific prey. After providing a short introduction to general features of myxobacterial biology which are relevant to predation, this review brings together a rapidly growing body of work into the molecular mechanisms and genetic basis of predation, presenting a summary of current knowledge, highlighting trends in research and suggesting strategies by which we can potentially exploit myxobacterial predation in the future.

Myxococcus xanthus predation: an updated overview

Bacterial predators are widely distributed across a variety of natural environments. Understanding predatory interactions is of great importance since they play a defining role in shaping microbial communities in habitats such as soils. Myxococcus xanthus is a soil-dwelling bacterial predator that can prey on Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and even on eukaryotic microorganisms. This model organism has been studied for many decades for its unusual lifecycle, characterized by the formation of multicellular fruiting bodies filled with myxospores. However, less is known about its predatory behavior despite being an integral part of its lifecycle. Predation in M. xanthus is a multifactorial process that involves several mechanisms working synergistically, including motility systems to efficiently track and hunt prey, and a combination of short-range and contact-dependent mechanisms to achieve prey death and feed on them. In the short-range attack, M. xanthus is best known for the collective production of secondary metabolites and hydrolytic enzymes to kill prey and degrade cellular components. On the other hand, contact-dependent killing is a cell-to-cell process that relies on Tad-like and type III secretion systems. Furthermore, recent research has revealed that metals also play an important role during predation, either by inducing oxidative stress in the prey, or by competing for essential metals. In this paper, we review the current knowledge about M. xanthus predation, focusing on the different mechanisms used to hunt, kill, and feed on its prey, considering the most recent discoveries and the transcriptomic data available.

Interactions of Different Streptomyces Species and Myxococcus xanthus Affect Myxococcus Development and Induce the Production of DK-Xanthenes

The co-culturing of microorganisms is a well-known strategy to study microbial interactions in the laboratory. This approach facilitates the identification of new signals and molecules produced by one species that affects other species' behavior. In this work, we have studied the effects of the interaction of nine Streptomyces species (S. albidoflavus, S. ambofaciens, S. argillaceus, S. griseus, S. lividans, S. olivaceus, S. parvulus, S. peucetius, and S. rochei) with the predator bacteria Myxococcus xanthus, five of which (S. albidoflavus, S. griseus, S. lividans, S. olivaceus, and S. argillaceus) induce mound formation of M. xanthus on complex media (Casitone Yeast extract (CYE) and Casitone tris (CTT); media on which M. xanthus does not form these aggregates under normal culture conditions. An in-depth study on S. griseus-M. xanthus interactions (the Streptomyces strain producing the strongest effect) has allowed the identification of two siderophores produced by S. griseus, demethylenenocardamine and nocardamine, responsible for this grouping effect over M. xanthus. Experiments using pure commercial nocardamine and different concentrations of FeSO4 show that iron depletion is responsible for the behavior of M. xanthus. Additionally, it was found that molecules, smaller than 3 kDa, produced by S. peucetius can induce the production of DK-xanthenes by M. xanthus.

Two reasons to kill: predation and kin discrimination in myxobacteria

Myxobacteria are social microbial predators that use cell-cell contacts to identify bacterial or fungal prey and to differentiate kin relatives to initiate cellular responses. For prey killing, they assemble Tad-like and type III-like secretion systems at contact sites. For kin discrimination (KD), they assemble outer membrane exchange complexes composed of the TraA and TraB receptors at contacts sites. A type VI secretion system and Rhs proteins also mediate KD. Following cellular recognition, these systems deliver appropriate effectors into target cells. For prey, this leads to cell death and lysis for nutrient consumption by myxobacteria. In KD, a panel of effectors are delivered, and if adjacent cells are clonal cells, resistance ensues because they express a cognate panel of immunity factors; while nonkin lack complete immunity and are intoxicated. This review compares and contrasts recent findings from these systems in myxobacteria.

Transcriptomic response of Sinorhizobium meliloti to the predatory attack of Myxococcus xanthus

Bacterial predation impacts microbial community structures, which can have both positive and negative effects on plant and animal health and on environmental sustainability. Myxococcus xanthus is an epibiotic soil predator with a broad range of prey, including Sinorhizobium meliloti, which establishes nitrogen-fixing symbiosis with legumes. During the M. xanthus-S. meliloti interaction, the predator must adapt its transcriptome to kill and lyse the target (predatosome), and the prey must orchestrate a transcriptional response (defensome) to protect itself against the biotic stress caused by the predatory attack. Here, we describe the transcriptional changes taking place in S. meliloti in response to myxobacterial predation. The results indicate that the predator induces massive changes in the prey transcriptome with up-regulation of protein synthesis and secretion, energy generation, and fatty acid (FA) synthesis, while down-regulating genes required for FA degradation and carbohydrate transport and metabolism. The reconstruction of up-regulated pathways suggests that S. meliloti modifies the cell envelop by increasing the production of different surface polysaccharides (SPSs) and membrane lipids. Besides the barrier role of SPSs, additional mechanisms involving the activity of efflux pumps and the peptide uptake transporter BacA, together with the production of H₂O₂ and formaldehyde have been unveiled. Also, the induction of the iron-uptake machinery in both predator and prey reflects a strong competition for this metal. With this research we complete the characterization of the complex transcriptional changes that occur during the M. xanthus-S. meliloti interaction, which can impact the establishment of beneficial symbiosis with legumes.

A Diverged Transcriptional Network for Usage of Two Fe-S Cluster Biogenesis Machineries in the Delta-Proteobacterium Myxococcus xanthus

Myxococcus xanthus possesses two Fe-S cluster biogenesis machineries, ISC (iron-sulfur cluster) and SUF (sulfur mobilization). Here, we show that in comparison to the phylogenetically distant Enterobacteria, which also have both machineries, M. xanthus evolved an independent transcriptional scheme to coordinately regulate the expression of these machineries. This transcriptional response is directed by RisR, which we show to belong to a phylogenetically distant and biochemically distinct subgroup of the Rrf2 transcription factor family, in comparison to IscR that regulates the isc and suf operons in Enterobacteria. We report that RisR harbors an Fe-S cluster and that holo-RisR acts as a repressor of both the isc and suf operons, in contrast to Escherichia coli, where holo-IscR represses the isc operon whereas apo-IscR activates the suf operon. In addition, we establish that the nature of the cluster and the DNA binding sites of RisR, in the isc and suf operons, diverge from those of IscR. We further show that in M. xanthus, the two machineries appear to be fully interchangeable in maintaining housekeeping levels of Fe-S cluster biogenesis and in synthesizing the Fe-S cluster for their common regulator, RisR. We also demonstrate that in response to oxidative stress and iron limitation, transcriptional upregulation of the M. xanthus isc and suf operons was mediated solely by RisR and that the contribution of the SUF machinery was greater than the ISC machinery. Altogether, these findings shed light on the diversity of homeostatic mechanisms exploited by bacteria to coordinately use two Fe-S cluster biogenesis machineries. IMPORTANCE Fe-S proteins are ubiquitous and control a wide variety of key biological processes; therefore, maintaining Fe-S cluster homeostasis is an essential task for all organisms. Here, we provide the first example of how a bacterium from the Deltaproteobacteria branch coordinates expression of two Fe-S cluster biogenesis machineries. The results revealed a new model of coordination, highlighting the unique and common features that have independently emerged in phylogenetically distant bacteria to maintain Fe-S cluster homeostasis in response to environmental changes. Regulation is orchestrated by a previously uncharacterized transcriptional regulator, RisR, belonging to the Rrf2 superfamily, whose members are known to sense diverse environmental stresses frequently encountered by bacteria. Understanding how M. xanthus maintains Fe-S cluster homeostasis via RisR regulation revealed a strategy reflective of the aerobic lifestyle of this organsim. This new knowledge also paves the way to improve production of Fe-S-dependent secondary metabolites using M. xanthus as a chassis.

Myxobacterial Predation: A Standardised Lawn Predation Assay Highlights Strains with Unusually Efficient Predatory Activity

Myxobacteria prey upon a broad range of microorganisms. Lawn assays are commonly used to quantify myxobacterial predation-myxobacterial suspensions are spotted onto prey lawns, and monitored via spot expansion. The diversity in motility behaviours of myxobacterial strains and differing assay protocols in myxobacteriology laboratories led us to develop a highly-specified assay, which was applied to 28 myxobacterial strains preying on seven phytopathogenic prey species. Generally, prey organisms showed no qualitative differences in their susceptibility/resistance to myxobacterial predation. For most myxobacteria, prey did not stimulate, and in ~50% of cases actively hindered colony expansion. Only ~25% of predator/prey strain combinations exhibited greater colony expansion than in the absence of nutrients. The activity of predatory strains against different prey correlated, implying effective predators may have relatively non-specific predation mechanisms (e.g., broad specificity proteases/lipases), but no correlation was observed between predatory activity and phylogeny. Predation on dead (but intact) or lysed prey cells gave greater colony expansion than on live prey. Occasional strains grew substantially faster on dead compared to lysed cells, or vice-versa. Such differences in accessing nutrients from live, dead and lysed cells indicates there are strain-specific differences in the efficiencies/machineries of prey killing and nutrient acquisition, which has important implications for the ecology of myxobacterial predators and their prey.

Comparative genomics and transcriptomics insight into myxobacterial metabolism potentials and multiple predatory strategies

Myxobacteria are part of the phylum Myxococcota, encompassing four orders. Most of them display complex lifestyles and broad predation profiles. However, metabolic potential and predation mechanisms of different myxobacteria remains poorly understood. Herein, we used comparative genomics and transcriptomics to analyze metabolic potentials and differentially expressed gene (DEG) profiles of Myxococcus xanthus monoculture (Mx) compared to coculture with Escherichia coli (MxE) and Micrococcus luteus (MxM) prey. The results showed that myxobacteria had conspicuous metabolic deficiencies, various protein secretion systems (PSSs) and the common type II secretion system (T2SS). RNA-seq data demonstrated that M. xanthus overexpressed the potential predation DEGs, particularly those encoding T2SS, the tight adherence (Tad) pilus, different secondary metabolites (myxochelin A/B, myxoprincomide, myxovirescin A1, geosmin and myxalamide), glycosyl transferases and peptidase during predation. Furthermore, the myxalamide biosynthesis gene clusters, two hypothetical gene clusters and one arginine biosynthesis clusters were highly differential expressed in MxE versus MxM. Additionally, homologue proteins of the Tad (kil) system and five secondary metabolites were in different obligate or facultative predators. Finally, we provided a working model for exhibiting multiple predatory strategies when M. xanthus prey on M. luteus and E. coli. These results might spur application-oriented research on the development of novel antibacterial strategies.