1
|
Grigalionienė K, Burnytė B, Ambrozaitytė L, Utkus A. Wide diagnostic and genotypic spectrum in patients with suspected mitochondrial disease. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2023; 18:307. [PMID: 37784170 PMCID: PMC10544509 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-023-02921-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mitochondrial Diseases (MDs) are a diverse group of neurometabolic disorders characterized by impaired mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and caused by pathogenic variants in more than 400 genes. The implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies helps to increase the understanding of molecular basis and diagnostic yield of these conditions. The purpose of the study was to investigate diagnostic and genotypic spectrum in patients with suspected MD. The comprehensive analysis of mtDNA variants using Sanger sequencing was performed in the group of 83 unrelated individuals with clinically suspected mitochondrial disease. Additionally, targeted next generation sequencing or whole exome sequencing (WES) was performed for 30 patients of the study group. RESULTS The overall diagnostic rate was 21.7% for the patients with suspected MD, increasing to 36.7% in the group of patients where NGS methods were applied. Mitochondrial disease was confirmed in 11 patients (13.3%), including few classical mitochondrial syndromes (MELAS, MERRF, Leigh and Kearns-Sayre syndrome) caused by pathogenic mtDNA variants (8.4%) and MDs caused by pathogenic variants in five nDNA genes. Other neuromuscular diseases caused by pathogenic variants in seven nDNA genes, were confirmed in seven patients (23.3%). CONCLUSION The wide spectrum of identified rare mitochondrial or neurodevelopmental diseases proves that MD suspected patients would mostly benefit from an extensive genetic profiling allowing rapid diagnostics and improving the care of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Grigalionienė
- Department of Human and Medical Genetics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Santariškių Str. 2, Vilnius, LT-08661, Lithuania.
| | - Birutė Burnytė
- Department of Human and Medical Genetics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Santariškių Str. 2, Vilnius, LT-08661, Lithuania
| | - Laima Ambrozaitytė
- Department of Human and Medical Genetics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Santariškių Str. 2, Vilnius, LT-08661, Lithuania
| | - Algirdas Utkus
- Department of Human and Medical Genetics, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Santariškių Str. 2, Vilnius, LT-08661, Lithuania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moore JL, Patterson NH, Norris JL, Caprioli RM. Prospective on Imaging Mass Spectrometry in Clinical Diagnostics. Mol Cell Proteomics 2023; 22:100576. [PMID: 37209813 PMCID: PMC10545939 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcpro.2023.100576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 05/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Imaging mass spectrometry (IMS) is a molecular technology utilized for spatially driven research, providing molecular maps from tissue sections. This article reviews matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) IMS and its progress as a primary tool in the clinical laboratory. MALDI mass spectrometry has been used to classify bacteria and perform other bulk analyses for plate-based assays for many years. However, the clinical application of spatial data within a tissue biopsy for diagnoses and prognoses is still an emerging opportunity in molecular diagnostics. This work considers spatially driven mass spectrometry approaches for clinical diagnostics and addresses aspects of new imaging-based assays that include analyte selection, quality control/assurance metrics, data reproducibility, data classification, and data scoring. It is necessary to implement these tasks for the rigorous translation of IMS to the clinical laboratory; however, this requires detailed standardized protocols for introducing IMS into the clinical laboratory to deliver reliable and reproducible results that inform and guide patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nathan Heath Patterson
- Frontier Diagnostics, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; Vanderbilt University Mass Spectrometry Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Jeremy L Norris
- Frontier Diagnostics, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; Vanderbilt University Mass Spectrometry Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Richard M Caprioli
- Frontier Diagnostics, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; Vanderbilt University Mass Spectrometry Research Center, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA; Departments of Biochemistry, Pharmacology, Chemistry, and Medicine, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wojcik MH, Reuter CM, Marwaha S, Mahmoud M, Duyzend MH, Barseghyan H, Yuan B, Boone PM, Groopman EE, Délot EC, Jain D, Sanchis-Juan A, Starita LM, Talkowski M, Montgomery SB, Bamshad MJ, Chong JX, Wheeler MT, Berger SI, O'Donnell-Luria A, Sedlazeck FJ, Miller DE. Beyond the exome: What's next in diagnostic testing for Mendelian conditions. Am J Hum Genet 2023; 110:1229-1248. [PMID: 37541186 PMCID: PMC10432150 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2023.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/14/2023] [Indexed: 08/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite advances in clinical genetic testing, including the introduction of exome sequencing (ES), more than 50% of individuals with a suspected Mendelian condition lack a precise molecular diagnosis. Clinical evaluation is increasingly undertaken by specialists outside of clinical genetics, often occurring in a tiered fashion and typically ending after ES. The current diagnostic rate reflects multiple factors, including technical limitations, incomplete understanding of variant pathogenicity, missing genotype-phenotype associations, complex gene-environment interactions, and reporting differences between clinical labs. Maintaining a clear understanding of the rapidly evolving landscape of diagnostic tests beyond ES, and their limitations, presents a challenge for non-genetics professionals. Newer tests, such as short-read genome or RNA sequencing, can be challenging to order, and emerging technologies, such as optical genome mapping and long-read DNA sequencing, are not available clinically. Furthermore, there is no clear guidance on the next best steps after inconclusive evaluation. Here, we review why a clinical genetic evaluation may be negative, discuss questions to be asked in this setting, and provide a framework for further investigation, including the advantages and disadvantages of new approaches that are nascent in the clinical sphere. We present a guide for the next best steps after inconclusive molecular testing based upon phenotype and prior evaluation, including when to consider referral to research consortia focused on elucidating the underlying cause of rare unsolved genetic disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica H Wojcik
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Division of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chloe M Reuter
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Shruti Marwaha
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Medhat Mahmoud
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Michael H Duyzend
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Hayk Barseghyan
- Center for Genetics Medicine Research, Children's National Research Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC 20010, USA; Department of Genomics and Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037, USA
| | - Bo Yuan
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics and Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Philip M Boone
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Emily E Groopman
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Emmanuèle C Délot
- Department of Genomics and Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037, USA; Center for Genetics Medicine Research, Children's National Research and Innovation Campus, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037, USA
| | - Deepti Jain
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Alba Sanchis-Juan
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Lea M Starita
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Michael Talkowski
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA; Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - Stephen B Montgomery
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Michael J Bamshad
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Genetic Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Jessica X Chong
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Genetic Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | - Matthew T Wheeler
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Seth I Berger
- Center for Genetics Medicine Research and Rare Disease Institute, Children's National Hospital, Washington, DC 20010, USA
| | - Anne O'Donnell-Luria
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142, USA; Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA; Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA
| | - Fritz J Sedlazeck
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030, USA; Department of Computer Science, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005, USA
| | - Danny E Miller
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Department of Pediatrics, Division of Genetic Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wojcik MH, Reuter CM, Marwaha S, Mahmoud M, Duyzend MH, Barseghyan H, Yuan B, Boone PM, Groopman EE, Délot EC, Jain D, Sanchis-Juan A, Starita LM, Talkowski M, Montgomery SB, Bamshad MJ, Chong JX, Wheeler MT, Berger SI, O’Donnell-Luria A, Sedlazeck FJ, Miller DE. Beyond the exome: what's next in diagnostic testing for Mendelian conditions. ARXIV 2023:arXiv:2301.07363v1. [PMID: 36713248 PMCID: PMC9882576] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Despite advances in clinical genetic testing, including the introduction of exome sequencing (ES), more than 50% of individuals with a suspected Mendelian condition lack a precise molecular diagnosis. Clinical evaluation is increasingly undertaken by specialists outside of clinical genetics, often occurring in a tiered fashion and typically ending after ES. The current diagnostic rate reflects multiple factors, including technical limitations, incomplete understanding of variant pathogenicity, missing genotype-phenotype associations, complex gene-environment interactions, and reporting differences between clinical labs. Maintaining a clear understanding of the rapidly evolving landscape of diagnostic tests beyond ES, and their limitations, presents a challenge for non-genetics professionals. Newer tests, such as short-read genome or RNA sequencing, can be challenging to order and emerging technologies, such as optical genome mapping and long-read DNA or RNA sequencing, are not available clinically. Furthermore, there is no clear guidance on the next best steps after inconclusive evaluation. Here, we review why a clinical genetic evaluation may be negative, discuss questions to be asked in this setting, and provide a framework for further investigation, including the advantages and disadvantages of new approaches that are nascent in the clinical sphere. We present a guide for the next best steps after inconclusive molecular testing based upon phenotype and prior evaluation, including when to consider referral to a consortium such as GREGoR, which is focused on elucidating the underlying cause of rare unsolved genetic disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica H. Wojcik
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA
- Division of Newborn Medicine, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Chloe M. Reuter
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
| | - Shruti Marwaha
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
| | - Medhat Mahmoud
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston TX 77030 USA
| | - Michael H. Duyzend
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - Hayk Barseghyan
- Center for Genetics Medicine Research, Children’s National Research Institute, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC 20010 USA
- Department of Genomics and Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037 USA
| | - Bo Yuan
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics and Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston TX 77030 USA
| | - Philip M. Boone
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - Emily E. Groopman
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - Emmanuèle C. Délot
- Department of Genomics and Precision Medicine, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037 USA
- Center for Genetics Medicine Research, Children’s National Research and Innovation Campus, Washington, DC, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, George Washington University, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20037 USA
| | - Deepti Jain
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195 USA
| | - Alba Sanchis-Juan
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | | | - Lea M. Starita
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195 USA
| | - Michael Talkowski
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114 USA
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School
- Stanley Center for Psychiatric Research, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA
| | - Stephen B. Montgomery
- Department of Biomedical Data Science, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
- Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
- Department of Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
| | - Michael J. Bamshad
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195 USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Genetic Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Jessica X. Chong
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Genetic Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
| | - Matthew T. Wheeler
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
| | - Seth I. Berger
- Center for Genetics Medicine Research and Rare Disease Institute, Children’s National Hospital, Washington, DC 20010 USA
| | - Anne O’Donnell-Luria
- Program in Medical and Population Genetics, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA 02142 USA
- Division of Genetics and Genomics, Boston Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115 USA
- Center for Genomic Medicine, Analytic and Translational Genetics Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114 USA
| | - Fritz J. Sedlazeck
- Human Genome Sequencing Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston TX 77030 USA
- Department of Computer Science, Rice University, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX, 77005 USA
| | - Danny E. Miller
- Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Genetic Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195 USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
A Formative Study of the Implementation of Whole Genome Sequencing in Northern Ireland. Genes (Basel) 2022; 13:genes13071104. [PMID: 35885887 PMCID: PMC9316942 DOI: 10.3390/genes13071104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The UK 100,000 Genomes Project was a transformational research project which facilitated whole genome sequencing (WGS) diagnostics for rare diseases. We evaluated experiences of introducing WGS in Northern Ireland, providing recommendations for future projects. Methods: This formative evaluation included (1) an appraisal of the logistics of implementing and delivering WGS, (2) a survey of participant self-reported views and experiences, (3) semi-structured interviews with healthcare staff as key informants who were involved in the delivery of WGS and (4) a workshop discussion about interprofessional collaboration with respect to molecular diagnostics. Results: We engaged with >400 participants, with detailed reflections obtained from 74 participants including patients, caregivers, key National Health Service (NHS) informants, and researchers (patient survey n = 42; semi-structured interviews n = 19; attendees of the discussion workshop n = 13). Overarching themes included the need to improve rare disease awareness, education, and support services, as well as interprofessional collaboration being central to an effective, mainstreamed molecular diagnostic service. Conclusions: Recommendations for streamlining precision medicine for patients with rare diseases include administrative improvements (e.g., streamlining of the consent process), educational improvements (e.g., rare disease training provided from undergraduate to postgraduate education alongside genomics training for non-genetic specialists) and analytical improvements (e.g., multidisciplinary collaboration and improved computational infrastructure).
Collapse
|
6
|
New Developments and Possibilities in Reanalysis and Reinterpretation of Whole Exome Sequencing Datasets for Unsolved Rare Diseases Using Machine Learning Approaches. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23126792. [PMID: 35743235 PMCID: PMC9224427 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23126792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Rare diseases impact the lives of 300 million people in the world. Rapid advances in bioinformatics and genomic technologies have enabled the discovery of causes of 20–30% of rare diseases. However, most rare diseases have remained as unsolved enigmas to date. Newer tools and availability of high throughput sequencing data have enabled the reanalysis of previously undiagnosed patients. In this review, we have systematically compiled the latest developments in the discovery of the genetic causes of rare diseases using machine learning methods. Importantly, we have detailed methods available to reanalyze existing whole exome sequencing data of unsolved rare diseases. We have identified different reanalysis methodologies to solve problems associated with sequence alterations/mutations, variation re-annotation, protein stability, splice isoform malfunctions and oligogenic analysis. In addition, we give an overview of new developments in the field of rare disease research using whole genome sequencing data and other omics.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lai M, Zhang X, Zhou D, Zhang X, Zhu M, Liu Q, Zhang Y, Wang D. Integrating serum proteomics and metabolomics to compare the common and distinct features between acute aggressive ischemic stroke (APIS) and acute non-aggressive ischemic stroke (ANPIS). J Proteomics 2022; 261:104581. [PMID: 35421619 DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2022.104581] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2022] [Revised: 03/02/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Understanding common and distinct pathophysiological features between acute progressive ischemic stroke (APIS) and acute non-progressive ischemic stroke (ANPIS) is a prerequisite to making clear the mechanism to determine the prognosis of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). Here, we recruited three independent sets of subjects, all of which included the APIS, ANPIS, and control groups. They were used for serum proteomic and metabolomic analyses, and validation of the critical pathophysiological processes and potential biomarkers of APIS, respectively. Results showed that there were both common and distinct metabolome and proteome between APIS and ANPIS. APIS and ANPIS shared basic processes of AIS in inflammation and oxidative stress response. Coagulation and lipid metabolism disorder, activation of the complement system, and inflammation may enhance with each other in the symptom worsening of APIS. The contents of serum amyloid A1 (SAA1) and S100 calcium-binding protein A9 (S100-A9) in the validation set confirmed the key pathophysiological processes indicated by omics data; they also jointly conferred a moderate value to distinguish APIS from ANPIS. Collectively, disturbance in coagulation and lipid metabolism, complement activation, and inflammation may be synergistically involved in symptom deterioration in APIS. SAA1 and S100-A9 serve as a potential biomarker panel to distinguish APIS from ANPIS. THE SIGNIFICANCE: In this study, we integrated serum proteomics and metabolomics to explore the similarities and differences in pathophysiological processes between APIS and ANPIS. The global metabolic networks have been constructed, and the crucial common pathophysiological processes and the key distinct pathophysiological features between APIS and ANPIS were investigated based on the differentially expressed proteins and metabolites (DEPs/DEMs). Furthermore, pivotal serum proteins (SAA1 and S100A9) were detected in a dependent set to validate the key pathophysiological characteristics, as well as to assess the possibility of them being used as a biomarker panel. Taken together, the multi-omics integration strategy used in this clinical study shows potential to comprehensively interpret and compare the pathophysiological processes of AIS in various conditions, as well as to screen a reliable new biomarker panel.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Minchao Lai
- Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, China
| | - Xiaojun Zhang
- Institute of Marine Sciences and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, China
| | - Danya Zhou
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Shantou, China; School of Basic Medicine, Sanquan College of Xinxiang Medical University, Xinxiang, China
| | | | | | - Qingxian Liu
- Department of Nursing, Shantou University Medical College (SUMC), China
| | - Ye Zhang
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Shantou, China
| | - Dian Wang
- Department of Forensic Medicine, Shantou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Pratella D, Ait-El-Mkadem Saadi S, Bannwarth S, Paquis-Fluckinger V, Bottini S. A Survey of Autoencoder Algorithms to Pave the Diagnosis of Rare Diseases. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:10891. [PMID: 34639231 PMCID: PMC8509321 DOI: 10.3390/ijms221910891] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Revised: 10/04/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Rare diseases (RDs) concern a broad range of disorders and can result from various origins. For a long time, the scientific community was unaware of RDs. Impressive progress has already been made for certain RDs; however, due to the lack of sufficient knowledge, many patients are not diagnosed. Nowadays, the advances in high-throughput sequencing technologies such as whole genome sequencing, single-cell and others, have boosted the understanding of RDs. To extract biological meaning using the data generated by these methods, different analysis techniques have been proposed, including machine learning algorithms. These methods have recently proven to be valuable in the medical field. Among such approaches, unsupervised learning methods via neural networks including autoencoders (AEs) or variational autoencoders (VAEs) have shown promising performances with applications on various type of data and in different contexts, from cancer to healthy patient tissues. In this review, we discuss how AEs and VAEs have been used in biomedical settings. Specifically, we discuss their current applications and the improvements achieved in diagnostic and survival of patients. We focus on the applications in the field of RDs, and we discuss how the employment of AEs and VAEs would enhance RD understanding and diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Pratella
- Center of Modeling, Simulation and Interactions, Université Côte d’Azur, 06200 Nice, France;
| | - Samira Ait-El-Mkadem Saadi
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nice, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Nice (IRCAN), Université Côte d’Azur, Inserm U1081, CNRS UMR 7284, 06200 Nice, France; (S.A.-E.-M.S.); (S.B.); (V.P.-F.)
| | - Sylvie Bannwarth
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nice, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Nice (IRCAN), Université Côte d’Azur, Inserm U1081, CNRS UMR 7284, 06200 Nice, France; (S.A.-E.-M.S.); (S.B.); (V.P.-F.)
| | - Véronique Paquis-Fluckinger
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nice, Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging, Nice (IRCAN), Université Côte d’Azur, Inserm U1081, CNRS UMR 7284, 06200 Nice, France; (S.A.-E.-M.S.); (S.B.); (V.P.-F.)
| | - Silvia Bottini
- Center of Modeling, Simulation and Interactions, Université Côte d’Azur, 06200 Nice, France;
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Reska D, Czajkowski M, Jurczuk K, Boldak C, Kwedlo W, Bauer W, Koszelew J, Kretowski M. Integration of solutions and services for multi-omics data analysis towards personalized medicine. Biocybern Biomed Eng 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.bbe.2021.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
10
|
Zanfardino P, Doccini S, Santorelli FM, Petruzzella V. Tackling Dysfunction of Mitochondrial Bioenergetics in the Brain. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:8325. [PMID: 34361091 PMCID: PMC8348117 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22158325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2021] [Revised: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Oxidative phosphorylation (OxPhos) is the basic function of mitochondria, although the landscape of mitochondrial functions is continuously growing to include more aspects of cellular homeostasis. Thanks to the application of -omics technologies to the study of the OxPhos system, novel features emerge from the cataloging of novel proteins as mitochondrial thus adding details to the mitochondrial proteome and defining novel metabolic cellular interrelations, especially in the human brain. We focussed on the diversity of bioenergetics demand and different aspects of mitochondrial structure, functions, and dysfunction in the brain. Definition such as 'mitoexome', 'mitoproteome' and 'mitointeractome' have entered the field of 'mitochondrial medicine'. In this context, we reviewed several genetic defects that hamper the last step of aerobic metabolism, mostly involving the nervous tissue as one of the most prominent energy-dependent tissues and, as consequence, as a primary target of mitochondrial dysfunction. The dual genetic origin of the OxPhos complexes is one of the reasons for the complexity of the genotype-phenotype correlation when facing human diseases associated with mitochondrial defects. Such complexity clinically manifests with extremely heterogeneous symptoms, ranging from organ-specific to multisystemic dysfunction with different clinical courses. Finally, we briefly discuss the future directions of the multi-omics study of human brain disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paola Zanfardino
- Department of Medical Basic Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy;
| | - Stefano Doccini
- IRCCS Fondazione Stella Maris, Calambrone, 56128 Pisa, Italy;
| | | | - Vittoria Petruzzella
- Department of Medical Basic Sciences, Neurosciences and Sense Organs, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Picard M, Scott-Boyer MP, Bodein A, Périn O, Droit A. Integration strategies of multi-omics data for machine learning analysis. Comput Struct Biotechnol J 2021; 19:3735-3746. [PMID: 34285775 PMCID: PMC8258788 DOI: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 154] [Impact Index Per Article: 51.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Increased availability of high-throughput technologies has generated an ever-growing number of omics data that seek to portray many different but complementary biological layers including genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, and metabolomics. New insight from these data have been obtained by machine learning algorithms that have produced diagnostic and classification biomarkers. Most biomarkers obtained to date however only include one omic measurement at a time and thus do not take full advantage of recent multi-omics experiments that now capture the entire complexity of biological systems. Multi-omics data integration strategies are needed to combine the complementary knowledge brought by each omics layer. We have summarized the most recent data integration methods/ frameworks into five different integration strategies: early, mixed, intermediate, late and hierarchical. In this mini-review, we focus on challenges and existing multi-omics integration strategies by paying special attention to machine learning applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milan Picard
- Molecular Medicine Department, CHU de Québec Research Center, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Marie-Pier Scott-Boyer
- Molecular Medicine Department, CHU de Québec Research Center, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Antoine Bodein
- Molecular Medicine Department, CHU de Québec Research Center, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
| | - Olivier Périn
- Digital Sciences Department, L'Oréal Advanced Research, Aulnay-sous-bois, France
| | - Arnaud Droit
- Molecular Medicine Department, CHU de Québec Research Center, Université Laval, Québec, QC, Canada
- Corresponding author.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Yahia A, Stevanin G. The History of Gene Hunting in Hereditary Spinocerebellar Degeneration: Lessons From the Past and Future Perspectives. Front Genet 2021; 12:638730. [PMID: 33833777 PMCID: PMC8021710 DOI: 10.3389/fgene.2021.638730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Hereditary spinocerebellar degeneration (SCD) encompasses an expanding list of rare diseases with a broad clinical and genetic heterogeneity, complicating their diagnosis and management in daily clinical practice. Correct diagnosis is a pillar for precision medicine, a branch of medicine that promises to flourish with the progressive improvements in studying the human genome. Discovering the genes causing novel Mendelian phenotypes contributes to precision medicine by diagnosing subsets of patients with previously undiagnosed conditions, guiding the management of these patients and their families, and enabling the discovery of more causes of Mendelian diseases. This new knowledge provides insight into the biological processes involved in health and disease, including the more common complex disorders. This review discusses the evolution of the clinical and genetic approaches used to diagnose hereditary SCD and the potential of new tools for future discoveries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashraf Yahia
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, Sudan
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, National University, Khartoum, Sudan
- Institut du Cerveau, INSERM U1127, CNRS UMR7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, EPHE, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| | - Giovanni Stevanin
- Institut du Cerveau, INSERM U1127, CNRS UMR7225, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
- Ecole Pratique des Hautes Etudes, EPHE, PSL Research University, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Mitochondrial Syndromes Revisited. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10061249. [PMID: 33802970 PMCID: PMC8002645 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10061249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last ten years, the knowledge of the genetic basis of mitochondrial diseases has significantly advanced. However, the vast phenotypic variability linked to mitochondrial disorders and the peculiar characteristics of their genetics make mitochondrial disorders a complex group of disorders. Although specific genetic alterations have been associated with some syndromic presentations, the genotype–phenotype relationship in mitochondrial disorders is complex (a single mutation can cause several clinical syndromes, while different genetic alterations can cause similar phenotypes). This review will revisit the most common syndromic pictures of mitochondrial disorders, from a clinical rather than a molecular perspective. We believe that the new phenotype definitions implemented by recent large multicenter studies, and revised here, may contribute to a more homogeneous patient categorization, which will be useful in future studies on natural history and clinical trials.
Collapse
|