1
|
Cieslik EC, Ullsperger M, Gell M, Eickhoff SB, Langner R. Success versus failure in cognitive control: Meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2024; 156:105468. [PMID: 37979735 DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105468] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 11/13/2023] [Indexed: 11/20/2023]
Abstract
Brain mechanisms of error processing have often been investigated using response interference tasks and focusing on the posterior medial frontal cortex, which is also implicated in resolving response conflict in general. Thereby, the role other brain regions may play has remained undervalued. Here, activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses were used to synthesize the neuroimaging literature on brain activity related to committing errors versus responding successfully in interference tasks and to test for commonalities and differences. The salience network and the temporoparietal junction were commonly recruited irrespective of whether responses were correct or incorrect, pointing towards a general involvement in coping with situations that call for increased cognitive control. The dorsal posterior cingulate cortex, posterior thalamus, and left superior frontal gyrus showed error-specific convergence, which underscores their consistent involvement when performance goals are not met. In contrast, successful responding revealed stronger convergence in the dorsal attention network and lateral prefrontal regions. Underrecruiting these regions in error trials may reflect failures in activating the task-appropriate stimulus-response contingencies necessary for successful response execution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edna C Cieslik
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
| | - Markus Ullsperger
- Institute of Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany; Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Martin Gell
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany; Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Faculty of Medicine, RWTH, Aachen, Germany
| | - Simon B Eickhoff
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Robert Langner
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Düsseldorf, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany; Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Singh B, Wang Z, Constantinidis C. Neuronal selectivity for stimulus information determines prefrontal LFP gamma power regardless of task execution. Commun Biol 2023; 6:505. [PMID: 37169826 PMCID: PMC10175284 DOI: 10.1038/s42003-023-04855-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Local field potential (LFP) power in the gamma frequency is modulated by cognitive variables during task execution. We sought to examine whether such modulations only emerge when task rules are established. We therefore analyzed neuronal firing and LFPs in different prefrontal subdivisions before and after the same monkeys were trained to perform cognitive tasks. Prior to task rule learning, sites containing neurons selective for stimuli already exhibited increased gamma power during and after the passive viewing of stimuli compared to the baseline period. Unexpectedly, when the same monkeys learned to maintain these stimuli in working memory, the elevation of gamma power above the baseline was diminished, despite an overall increase in firing rate. Learning and executing the task further decoupled LFP power from single neuron firing. Gamma power decreased at the time when subjects needed to make a judgment about whether two stimuli were the same or not, and differential gamma power was observed for matching and nonmatching stimuli. Our results indicate that prefrontal gamma power emerges spontaneously, not necessarily tied to a cognitive task being executed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balbir Singh
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA.
| | - Zhengyang Wang
- Neuroscience Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
| | - Christos Constantinidis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
- Neuroscience Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37235, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, 37232, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cieslik EC, Ullsperger M, Gell M, Eickhoff SB, Langner R. Success versus failure in cognitive control: meta-analytic evidence from neuroimaging studies on error processing. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.05.10.540136. [PMID: 37214978 PMCID: PMC10197606 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.10.540136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Brain mechanisms of error processing have often been investigated using response interference tasks and focusing on the posterior medial frontal cortex, which is also implicated in resolving response conflict in general. Thereby, the role other brain regions may play has remained undervalued. Here, activation likelihood estimation meta-analyses were used to synthesize the neuroimaging literature on brain activity related to committing errors versus responding successfully in interference tasks and to test for commonalities and differences. The salience network and the temporoparietal junction were commonly recruited irrespective of whether responses were correct or incorrect, pointing towards a general involvement in coping with situations that call for increased cognitive control. The dorsal posterior cingulate cortex, posterior thalamus, and left superior frontal gyrus showed error-specific convergence, which underscores their consistent involvement when performance goals are not met. In contrast, successful responding revealed stronger convergence in the dorsal attention network and lateral prefrontal regions. Underrecruiting these regions in error trials may reflect failures in activating the task-appropriate stimulus-response contingencies necessary for successful response execution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edna C. Cieslik
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Markus Ullsperger
- Institute of Psychology, Otto-von-Guericke University, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
- Center for Behavioral Brain Sciences, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Martin Gell
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Medical Faculty, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany
| | - Simon B. Eickhoff
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| | - Robert Langner
- Institute of Systems Neuroscience, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
- Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-7: Brain and Behaviour), Research Centre Jülich, Jülich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Singh B, Wang Z, Qi XL, Constantinidis C. Plasticity after cognitive training reflected in prefrontal local field potentials. iScience 2022; 25:104929. [PMID: 36065179 PMCID: PMC9440296 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Revised: 07/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Learning to perform a new cognitive task induces plasticity of the prefrontal cortex generally involving activation of more neurons and increases in firing rate; however, its effects on single neurons are diverse and complex. We sought to understand how training affects global measures of neural activity by recording and analyzing local field potentials (LFPs) in monkeys before and after they learned to perform working memory tasks. LFP power after training was characterized by a reduction in power in 20-40 Hz during the stimulus presentations and delay periods of the task. Both evoked power, synchronized to task events, and induced power exhibited this decrease after training. The effect was consistent across tasks requiring memory of spatial location and stimulus shape. Error trials were characterized by a lack of LFP power ramping around the fixation onset. Our results reveal signatures of cortical plasticity in LFPs associated with learning to perform cognitive tasks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Balbir Singh
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Zhengyang Wang
- Neuroscience Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
| | - Xue-Lian Qi
- Department of Neurobiology & Anatomy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA
| | - Christos Constantinidis
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Neuroscience Program, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37235, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37232, USA
| |
Collapse
|