1
|
Van Laethem D, Denissen S, Costers L, Descamps A, Baijot J, Van Remoortel A, Van Merhaegen-Wieleman A, D'hooghe MB, D'Haeseleer M, Smeets D, Sima DM, Van Schependom J, Nagels G. The Finger Dexterity Test: Validation study of a smartphone-based manual dexterity assessment. Mult Scler 2024; 30:121-130. [PMID: 38140857 DOI: 10.1177/13524585231216007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Nine-Hole Peg Test (9HPT) is the golden standard to measure manual dexterity in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). However, administration requires trained personnel and dedicated time during a clinical visit. OBJECTIVES The objective of this study is to validate a smartphone-based test for remote manual dexterity assessment, the icompanion Finger Dexterity Test (FDT), to be included into the icompanion application. METHODS A total of 65 MS and 81 healthy subjects were tested, and 20 healthy subjects were retested 2 weeks later. RESULTS The FDT significantly correlated with the 9HPT (dominant: ρ = 0.62, p < 0.001; non-dominant: ρ = 0.52, p < 0.001). MS subjects had significantly higher FDT scores than healthy subjects (dominant: p = 0.015; non-dominant: p = 0.013), which was not the case for the 9HPT. A significant correlation with age (dominant: ρ = 0.46, p < 0.001; non-dominant: ρ = 0.40, p = 0.002), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS, dominant: ρ = 0.36, p = 0.005; non-dominant: ρ = 0.31, p = 0.024), and disease duration for the non-dominant hand (ρ = 0.31, p = 0.016) was observed. There was a good test-retest reliability in healthy subjects (dominant: r = 0.69, p = 0.001; non-dominant: r = 0.87, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The icompanion FDT shows a moderate-to-good concurrent validity and test-retest reliability, differentiates between the MS subjects and healthy controls, and correlates with clinical parameters. This test can be implemented into routine MS care for remote follow-up of manual dexterity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delphine Van Laethem
- AIMS Lab, Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, UZ Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Stijn Denissen
- AIMS Lab, Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium/icometrix, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Lars Costers
- AIMS Lab, Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium/icometrix, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Johan Baijot
- AIMS Lab, Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Ann Van Remoortel
- Neurology Department, National Multiple Sclerosis Center, Melsbroek, Belgium
| | | | - Marie B D'hooghe
- Neurology Department, National Multiple Sclerosis Center, Melsbroek, Belgium
- Center for Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Miguel D'Haeseleer
- Neurology Department, National Multiple Sclerosis Center, Melsbroek, Belgium
- Neurology Department, UZ Brussel, Brussel, Belgium/Center for Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | | | | | - Jeroen Van Schependom
- AIMS Lab, Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
- Department of Electronics and Informatics (ETRO), Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Guy Nagels
- AIMS Lab, Center for Neurosciences, UZ Brussel, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
- Neurology Department, UZ Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
- University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Woelfle T, Bourguignon L, Lorscheider J, Kappos L, Naegelin Y, Jutzeler CR. Wearable Sensor Technologies to Assess Motor Functions in People With Multiple Sclerosis: Systematic Scoping Review and Perspective. J Med Internet Res 2023; 25:e44428. [PMID: 37498655 PMCID: PMC10415952 DOI: 10.2196/44428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Revised: 12/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Wearable sensor technologies have the potential to improve monitoring in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) and inform timely disease management decisions. Evidence of the utility of wearable sensor technologies in people with MS is accumulating but is generally limited to specific subgroups of patients, clinical or laboratory settings, and functional domains. OBJECTIVE This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of all studies that have used wearable sensors to assess, monitor, and quantify motor function in people with MS during daily activities or in a controlled laboratory setting and to shed light on the technological advances over the past decades. METHODS We systematically reviewed studies on wearable sensors to assess the motor performance of people with MS. We scanned PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science databases until December 31, 2022, considering search terms "multiple sclerosis" and those associated with wearable technologies and included all studies assessing motor functions. The types of results from relevant studies were systematically mapped into 9 predefined categories (association with clinical scores or other measures; test-retest reliability; group differences, 3 types; responsiveness to change or intervention; and acceptability to study participants), and the reporting quality was determined through 9 questions. We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) reporting guidelines. RESULTS Of the 1251 identified publications, 308 were included: 176 (57.1%) in a real-world context, 107 (34.7%) in a laboratory context, and 25 (8.1%) in a mixed context. Most publications studied physical activity (196/308, 63.6%), followed by gait (81/308, 26.3%), dexterity or tremor (38/308, 12.3%), and balance (34/308, 11%). In the laboratory setting, outcome measures included (in addition to clinical severity scores) 2- and 6-minute walking tests, timed 25-foot walking test, timed up and go, stair climbing, balance tests, and finger-to-nose test, among others. The most popular anatomical landmarks for wearable placement were the waist, wrist, and lower back. Triaxial accelerometers were most commonly used (229/308, 74.4%). A surge in the number of sensors embedded in smartphones and smartwatches has been observed. Overall, the reporting quality was good. CONCLUSIONS Continuous monitoring with wearable sensors could optimize the management of people with MS, but some hurdles still exist to full clinical adoption of digital monitoring. Despite a possible publication bias and vast heterogeneity in the outcomes reported, our review provides an overview of the current literature on wearable sensor technologies used for people with MS and highlights shortcomings, such as the lack of harmonization, transparency in reporting methods and results, and limited data availability for the research community. These limitations need to be addressed for the growing implementation of wearable sensor technologies in clinical routine and clinical trials, which is of utmost importance for further progress in clinical research and daily management of people with MS. TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO CRD42021243249; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=243249.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Woelfle
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Lucie Bourguignon
- Department of Health Sciences and Technology, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Johannes Lorscheider
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ludwig Kappos
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Yvonne Naegelin
- Research Center for Clinical Neuroimmunology and Neuroscience Basel, University Hospital and University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rinderknecht MD, Zanon M, Boonstra TA, Angelini L, Stanev D, Chan GG, Bunn L, Dondelinger F, Hosking R, Freeman J, Hobart J, Marsden J, Craveiro L. An observational study to assess validity and reliability of smartphone sensor-based gait and balance assessments in multiple sclerosis: Floodlight GaitLab protocol. Digit Health 2023; 9:20552076231205284. [PMID: 37868156 PMCID: PMC10588425 DOI: 10.1177/20552076231205284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Gait and balance impairments are often present in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) and have a significant impact on quality of life and independence. Gold-standard quantitative tools for assessing gait and balance such as motion capture systems and force plates usually require complex technical setups. Wearable sensors, including those integrated into smartphones, offer a more frequent, convenient, and minimally burdensome assessment of functional disability in a home environment. We developed a novel smartphone sensor-based application (Floodlight) that is being used in multiple research and clinical contexts, but a complete validation of this technology is still lacking. Methods This protocol describes an observational study designed to evaluate the analytical and clinical validity of Floodlight gait and balance tests. Approximately 100 PwMS and 35 healthy controls will perform multiple gait and balance tasks in both laboratory-based and real-world environments in order to explore the following properties: (a) concurrent validity of the Floodlight gait and balance tests against gold-standard assessments; (b) reliability of Floodlight digital measures derived under different controlled gait and balance conditions, and different on-body sensor locations; (c) ecological validity of the tests; and (d) construct validity compared with clinician- and patient-reported assessments. Conclusions The Floodlight GaitLab study (ISRCTN15993728) represents a critical step in the technical validation of Floodlight technology to measure gait and balance in PwMS, and will also allow the development of new test designs and algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Lisa Bunn
- Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | | | | | - Jenny Freeman
- Faculty of Health, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, UK
| | - Jeremy Hobart
- Plymouth University Peninsula Schools of Medicine and Dentistry, Plymouth, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Guo CC, Chiesa PA, de Moor C, Fazeli MS, Schofield T, Hofer K, Belachew S, Scotland A. Digital Devices for Assessing Motor Functions in Mobility-Impaired and Healthy Populations: Systematic Literature Review. J Med Internet Res 2022; 24:e37683. [DOI: 10.2196/37683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 10/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
With the advent of smart sensing technology, mobile and wearable devices can provide continuous and objective monitoring and assessment of motor function outcomes.
Objective
We aimed to describe the existing scientific literature on wearable and mobile technologies that are being used or tested for assessing motor functions in mobility-impaired and healthy adults and to evaluate the degree to which these devices provide clinically valid measures of motor function in these populations.
Methods
A systematic literature review was conducted by searching Embase, MEDLINE, CENTRAL (January 1, 2015, to June 24, 2020), the United States and European Union clinical trial registries, and the United States Food and Drug Administration website using predefined study selection criteria. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were performed by 2 independent reviewers.
Results
A total of 91 publications representing 87 unique studies were included. The most represented clinical conditions were Parkinson disease (n=51 studies), followed by stroke (n=5), Huntington disease (n=5), and multiple sclerosis (n=2). A total of 42 motion-detecting devices were identified, and the majority (n=27, 64%) were created for the purpose of health care–related data collection, although approximately 25% were personal electronic devices (eg, smartphones and watches) and 11% were entertainment consoles (eg, Microsoft Kinect or Xbox and Nintendo Wii). The primary motion outcomes were related to gait (n=30), gross motor movements (n=25), and fine motor movements (n=23). As a group, sensor-derived motion data showed a mean sensitivity of 0.83 (SD 7.27), a mean specificity of 0.84 (SD 15.40), a mean accuracy of 0.90 (SD 5.87) in discriminating between diseased individuals and healthy controls, and a mean Pearson r validity coefficient of 0.52 (SD 0.22) relative to clinical measures. We did not find significant differences in the degree of validity between in-laboratory and at-home sensor-based assessments nor between device class (ie, health care–related device, personal electronic devices, and entertainment consoles).
Conclusions
Sensor-derived motion data can be leveraged to classify and quantify disease status for a variety of neurological conditions. However, most of the recent research on digital clinical measures is derived from proof-of-concept studies with considerable variation in methodological approaches, and much of the reviewed literature has focused on clinical validation, with less than one-quarter of the studies performing analytical validation. Overall, future research is crucially needed to further consolidate that sensor-derived motion data may lead to the development of robust and transformative digital measurements intended to predict, diagnose, and quantify neurological disease state and its longitudinal change.
Collapse
|
5
|
Psilocybin microdosers demonstrate greater observed improvements in mood and mental health at one month relative to non-microdosing controls. Sci Rep 2022; 12:11091. [PMID: 35773270 PMCID: PMC9246852 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-14512-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Psilocybin microdosing involves repeated self-administration of mushrooms containing psilocybin at doses small enough to not impact regular functioning. Microdose practices are diverse and include combining psilocybin with substances such as lion’s mane mushrooms (Hericium erinaceus; HE) and niacin (vitamin-B3). Public uptake of microdosing has outpaced evidence, mandating further prospective research. Using a naturalistic, observational design, we followed psilocybin microdosers (n = 953) and non-microdosing comparators (n = 180) for approximately 30 days and identified small- to medium-sized improvements in mood and mental health that were generally consistent across gender, age and presence of mental health concerns, as we all as improvements in psychomotor performance that were specific to older adults. Supplementary analyses indicated that combining psilocybin with HE and B3 did not impact changes in mood and mental health. However, among older microdosers combining psilocybin, HE and B3 was associated with psychomotor improvements relative to psilocybin alone and psilocybin and HE. Our findings of mood and mental health improvements associated with psilocybin microdosing add to previous studies of psychedelic microdosing by using a comparator group and by examining the consistency of effects across age, gender, and mental health. Findings regarding the combination of psilocybin, HE and B3 are novel and highlight the need for further research to confirm and elucidate these apparent effects.
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Internet-connected devices, including personal computers, smartphones, smartwatches, and voice assistants, have evolved into powerful multisensor technologies that billions of people interact with daily to connect with friends and colleagues, access and share information, purchase goods, play games, and navigate their environment. Digital phenotyping taps into the data streams captured by these devices to characterize and understand health and disease. The purpose of this article is to summarize opportunities for digital phenotyping in neurology, review studies using everyday technologies to obtain motor and cognitive information, and provide a perspective on how neurologists can embrace and accelerate progress in this emerging field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anoopum S. Gupta
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Messan KS, Pham L, Harris T, Kim Y, Morgan V, Kosa P, Bielekova B. Assessment of Smartphone-Based Spiral Tracing in Multiple Sclerosis Reveals Intra-Individual Reproducibility as a Major Determinant of the Clinical Utility of the Digital Test. FRONTIERS IN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY 2022; 3:714682. [PMID: 35178527 PMCID: PMC8844508 DOI: 10.3389/fmedt.2021.714682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Technological advances, lack of medical professionals, high cost of face-to-face encounters, and disasters such as the COVID-19 pandemic fuel the telemedicine revolution. Numerous smartphone apps have been developed to measure neurological functions. However, their psychometric properties are seldom determined. It is unclear which designs underlie the eventual clinical utility of the smartphone tests. We have developed the smartphone Neurological Function Tests Suite (NeuFun-TS) and are systematically evaluating their psychometric properties against the gold standard of complete neurological examination digitalized into the NeurExTM app. This article examines the fifth and the most complex NeuFun-TS test, the "Spiral tracing." We generated 40 features in the training cohort (22 healthy donors [HD] and 89 patients with multiple sclerosis [MS]) and compared their intraclass correlation coefficient, fold change between HD and MS, and correlations with relevant clinical and imaging outcomes. We assembled the best features into machine-learning models and examined their performance in the independent validation cohort (45 patients with MS). We show that by involving multiple neurological functions, complex tests such as spiral tracing are susceptible to intra-individual variations, decreasing their reproducibility and clinical utility. Simple tests, reproducibly measuring single function(s) that can be aggregated to increase sensitivity, are preferable in app design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Komi S. Messan
- National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Office of Data Science and Emerging Technologies, Rockville, MD, United States
| | - Linh Pham
- National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, Neuroimmunological Diseases Section, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Thomas Harris
- National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, Neuroimmunological Diseases Section, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Yujin Kim
- National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, Neuroimmunological Diseases Section, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Vanessa Morgan
- National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, Neuroimmunological Diseases Section, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Peter Kosa
- National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, Neuroimmunological Diseases Section, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Bibiana Bielekova
- National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, Neuroimmunological Diseases Section, Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Candiri B, Talu B, Demirtas Karaoba D, Ozaltin GE, Yolbas S. Effect of psoriatic arthritis on the strength, proprioception, skill, coordination, and functional condition of the hand. Int J Rheum Dis 2021; 25:47-55. [PMID: 34821039 DOI: 10.1111/1756-185x.14241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2021] [Revised: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study was planned to evaluate the strength, proprioception, skill, coordination, and functional condition of the hand in individuals with psoriatic arthritis and to correlate disease activity with these parameters. METHODS Fifty-six individuals (psoriatic arthritis group, n = 36; control group, n = 20) were included in the study. Evaluations were performed of disease activity with Disease Activity Score 28; grip strength with a dynamometer and pinch strength with pinch gauge dynamometers; joint position sensation with a goniometer; finger skills with a mobile application; and coordination and skill of both hands with the Purdue Pegboard test. The Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) was used for hand functional evaluation. RESULTS There was a significant difference between the grip and pinch strength of the psoriatic arthritis group and the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the joint position sense measurements and the mobile application scores between the groups (P > 0.05). Purdue Pegboard scores showed a significant difference only in both hands and assembly subsections (P < 0.05). With Disease Activity Score 28, significant correlations were found between grip and pinch strength, mobile application scores, Purdue Pegboard all subsections, and left-hand joint position sense average error amount, and between MHQ and grip and pinch strength. CONCLUSIONS This study is the first to show that psoriatic arthritis has a negative effect especially on hand strength; grip strength decreases as disease severity increases and, skill, coordination, and functionality of hand deteriorate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Busra Candiri
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Burcu Talu
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Dilan Demirtas Karaoba
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Gulfem Ezgi Ozaltin
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Department, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| | - Servet Yolbas
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Rheumatology, Inonu University, Malatya, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alexander S, Peryer G, Gray E, Barkhof F, Chataway J. Wearable technologies to measure clinical outcomes in multiple sclerosis: A scoping review. Mult Scler 2021; 27:1643-1656. [PMID: 32749928 PMCID: PMC8474332 DOI: 10.1177/1352458520946005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2020] [Revised: 06/01/2020] [Accepted: 07/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Wearable technology refers to any sensor worn on the person, making continuous and remote monitoring available to many people with chronic disease, including multiple sclerosis (MS). Daily monitoring seems an ideal solution either as an outcome measure or as an adjunct to support rater-based monitoring in both clinical and research settings. There has been an increase in solutions that are available, yet there is little consensus on the most appropriate solution to use in either MS research or clinical practice. We completed a scoping review (using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines) to summarise the wearable solutions available in MS, to identify those approaches that could potentially be utilised in clinical trials, by evaluating the following: scalability, cost, patient adaptability and accuracy. We identified 35 unique products that measure gait, cognition, upper limb function, activity, mood and fatigue, with most of these solutions being phone applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Alexander
- Queen Square MS Centre and Department of
Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain
Sciences, University College London, London, UK
| | - Guy Peryer
- School of Health Sciences, University of East
Anglia, Norwich, UK
| | - Emma Gray
- The Multiple Sclerosis Society, London, UK
| | - Frederik Barkhof
- Queen Square MS Centre and Department of
Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain
Sciences, University College London, London, UK/Centre for Medical Image
Computing (CMIC), Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering,
University College London, London, UK/National Institute for Health Research
(NIHR), Biomedical Research Centre, University College London Hospitals
(UCLH), London, UK/Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, VU
University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeremy Chataway
- Queen Square MS Centre and Department of
Neuroinflammation, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, Faculty of Brain
Sciences, University College London, London, UK/National Institute for
Health Research (NIHR), Biomedical Research Centre, University College
London Hospitals (UCLH), London, UK/MRC CTU at UCL, Institute of Clinical
Trials and Methodology, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van der Walt A, Butzkueven H, Shin RK, Midaglia L, Capezzuto L, Lindemann M, Davies G, Butler LM, Costantino C, Montalban X. Developing a Digital Solution for Remote Assessment in Multiple Sclerosis: From Concept to Software as a Medical Device. Brain Sci 2021; 11:brainsci11091247. [PMID: 34573267 PMCID: PMC8471038 DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11091247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
There is increasing interest in the development and deployment of digital solutions to improve patient care and facilitate monitoring in medical practice, e.g., by remote observation of disease symptoms in the patients’ home environment. Digital health solutions today range from non-regulated wellness applications and research-grade exploratory instruments to regulated software as a medical device (SaMD). This paper discusses the considerations and complexities in developing innovative, effective, and validated SaMD for multiple sclerosis (MS). The development of SaMD requires a formalised approach (design control), inclusive of technical verification and analytical validation to ensure reliability. SaMD must be clinically evaluated, characterised for benefit and risk, and must conform to regulatory requirements associated with device classification. Cybersecurity and data privacy are also critical. Careful consideration of patient and provider needs throughout the design and testing process help developers overcome challenges of adoption in medical practice. Here, we explore the development pathway for SaMD in MS, leveraging experiences from the development of Floodlight™ MS, a continually evolving bundled solution of SaMD for remote functional assessment of MS. The development process will be charted while reflecting on common challenges in the digital space, with a view to providing insights for future developers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anneke van der Walt
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia;
- The Alfred, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +61-3-99030555
| | - Helmut Butzkueven
- Department of Neuroscience, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia;
| | - Robert K. Shin
- MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC 20007, USA;
| | - Luciana Midaglia
- Servei de Neurologia-Neuroimmunologia, Centre d’Esclerosi Múltiple de Catalunya (Cemcat), Institut de Recerca Vall d’Hebron (VHIR), Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Luca Capezzuto
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., 4070 Basel, Switzerland; (L.C.); (M.L.); (G.D.); (L.M.B.); (C.C.)
| | - Michael Lindemann
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., 4070 Basel, Switzerland; (L.C.); (M.L.); (G.D.); (L.M.B.); (C.C.)
| | - Geraint Davies
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., 4070 Basel, Switzerland; (L.C.); (M.L.); (G.D.); (L.M.B.); (C.C.)
| | - Lesley M. Butler
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., 4070 Basel, Switzerland; (L.C.); (M.L.); (G.D.); (L.M.B.); (C.C.)
| | - Cristina Costantino
- F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., 4070 Basel, Switzerland; (L.C.); (M.L.); (G.D.); (L.M.B.); (C.C.)
| | - Xavier Montalban
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Department of Neurology/Neuroimmunology, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08035 Barcelona, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bohannon RW, Wang I. Measurement of finger tapping performance using a smartphone application: a pilot study. J Phys Ther Sci 2021; 33:618-620. [PMID: 34393374 PMCID: PMC8332647 DOI: 10.1589/jpts.33.618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
[Purpose] Describe the measurement, reliability and validity of finger tapping
repetitions recorded using a commercially available smartphone application (app).
[Participants and Methods] We tested a convenience sample of 12 young right-handed
participants who completed unilateral index finger tapping and peg board completion tasks
with each hand. [Results] Measurement of finger tapping performance was practicable and
was shown to be acceptably reliable and able to distinguish between performance of the
dominant versus nondominant hand. Finger tapping was not correlated with pegboard
performance. [Conclusion] A small sample of young adults showed that measures of finger
tapping were easily obtained using a smartphone app. The measures demonstrated acceptable
reliability and known groups validity. They, however, may not reflect performance at other
measures of voluntary movement functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Inga Wang
- Department of Occupational Science and Technology, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Gromisch ES, Turner AP, Haselkorn JK, Lo AC, Agresta T. Mobile health (mHealth) usage, barriers, and technological considerations in persons with multiple sclerosis: a literature review. JAMIA Open 2021; 4:ooaa067. [PMID: 34514349 PMCID: PMC8423420 DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooaa067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2020] [Revised: 10/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Persons with multiple sclerosis (MS) can face a number of potential healthcare-related barriers, for which mobile health (mHealth) technology can be potentially beneficial. This review aimed to understand the frequency, current uses, and potential barriers with mHealth usage among persons with MS. METHODS A query string was used to identify articles on PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and IEEE Xplore that were published in English between January 2010 and December 2019. Abstracts were reviewed and selected based on a priori inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fifty-nine peer-reviewed research studies related to the study questions are summarized. RESULTS The majority of persons with MS were reported as using smartphones, although rates of mHealth utilization varied widely. mHealth usage was grouped into 3 broad categories: (1) disability and symptom measurement; (2) interventions and symptom management; and (3) tracking and promoting adherence. While there have been an increasing number of mHealth options, certain limitations associated with MS (eg, poor dexterity, memory problems) may affect usage, although including persons with MS in the design process can address some of these issues. DISCUSSION Given the increased attention to mHealth in this population and the current need for telehealth and at home devices, it is important that persons with MS and healthcare providers are involved in the development of new mHealth tools to ensure that the end product meets their needs. Considerations for addressing the potential mHealth use barriers in persons with MS are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth S Gromisch
- Mandell Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital, Trinity Health Of New England, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Rehabilitative Medicine, Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, North Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Medical Sciences, Frank H. Netter MD School of Medicine at Quinnipiac University, North Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Neurology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Aaron P Turner
- Multiple Sclerosis Center for Excellence West, Veterans Affairs, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Rehabilitation Care Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Rehabilitative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Jodie K Haselkorn
- Multiple Sclerosis Center for Excellence West, Veterans Affairs, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Rehabilitation Care Service, VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Rehabilitative Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Albert C Lo
- Mandell Center for Multiple Sclerosis, Mount Sinai Rehabilitation Hospital, Trinity Health Of New England, Hartford, Connecticut, USA
| | - Thomas Agresta
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
- Center for Quantitative Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Home video prediction of epileptic vs. nonepileptic seizures in US veterans. Epilepsy Behav 2021; 117:107811. [PMID: 33611097 DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2021.107811] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2020] [Revised: 01/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Using video-EEG (v-EEG) diagnosis as a gold standard, we assessed the predictive diagnostic value of home videos of spells with or without additional limited demographic data in US veterans referred for evaluation of epilepsy. Veterans, in particular, stand to benefit from improved diagnostic tools given higher rates of PNES and limited accessibility to care. METHODS This was a prospective, blinded diagnostic accuracy study in adults conducted at the Houston VA Medical Center from 12/2015-06/2019. Patients with a definitive diagnosis of epileptic seizures (ES), psychogenic nonepileptic seizures (PNES), or physiologic nonepileptic events (PhysNEE) from v-EEG monitoring were asked to submit home videos. Four board-certified epileptologists blinded to the original diagnosis formulated a diagnostic impression based upon the home video review alone and video plus limited demographic data. RESULTS Fifty patients (30 males; mean age 47.7 years) submitted home videos. Of these, 14 had ES, 33 had PNES, and three had PhysNEE diagnosed by v-EEG. The diagnostic accuracy by video alone was 88.0%, with a sensitivity of 83.9% and specificity of 89.6%. Providing raters with basic patient demographic information in addition to the home videos did not significantly improve diagnostic accuracy when comparing to reviewing the videos alone. Inter-rater agreement between four raters based on video was moderate with both videos alone (kappa = 0.59) and video plus limited demographic data (kappa = 0.60). SIGNIFICANCE This study demonstrated that home videos of paroxysmal events could be an important tool in reliably diagnosing ES vs. PNES in veterans referred for evaluation of epilepsy when interpreted by experts. A moderate inter-rater reliability was observed in this study.
Collapse
|
14
|
Smartphone-based symbol-digit modalities test reliably captures brain damage in multiple sclerosis. NPJ Digit Med 2021; 4:36. [PMID: 33627777 PMCID: PMC7904910 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-021-00401-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
As the burden of neurodegenerative diseases increases, time-limited clinic encounters do not allow quantification of complex neurological functions. Patient-collected digital biomarkers may remedy this, if they provide reliable information. However, psychometric properties of digital tools remain largely un-assessed. We developed a smartphone adaptation of the cognitive test, the Symbol-Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) by randomizing the test’s symbol-number codes and testing sequences. The smartphone SDMT showed comparable psychometric properties in 154 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and 39 healthy volunteers (HV). E.g., smartphone SDMT achieved slightly higher correlations with cognitive subscores of neurological examinations and with brain injury measured by MRI (R2 = 0.75, Rho = 0.83, p < 0.0001) than traditional SDMT. Mathematical adjustment for motoric disability of the dominant hand, measured by another smartphone test, compensates for the disadvantage of touch-based test. Averaging granular home measurements of the digital biomarker also increases accuracy of identifying true neurological decline.
Collapse
|
15
|
Tatum WO, Hirsch LJ, Gelfand MA, Acton EK, LaFrance WC, Duckrow RB, Chen DK, Blum AS, Hixson JD, Drazkowski JF, Benbadis SR, Cascino GD. Assessment of the Predictive Value of Outpatient Smartphone Videos for Diagnosis of Epileptic Seizures. JAMA Neurol 2021; 77:593-600. [PMID: 31961382 DOI: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.4785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 78] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
Importance Misdiagnosis of epilepsy is common. Video electroencephalogram provides a definitive diagnosis but is impractical for many patients referred for evaluation of epilepsy. Objective To evaluate the accuracy of outpatient smartphone videos in epilepsy. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, masked, diagnostic accuracy study (the OSmartViE study) took place between August 31, 2015, and August 31, 2018, at 8 academic epilepsy centers in the United States and included a convenience sample of 44 nonconsecutive outpatients who volunteered a smartphone video during evaluation and subsequently underwent video electroencephalogram monitoring. Three epileptologists uploaded videos for physicians from the 8 epilepsy centers to review. Main Outcomes and Measures Measures of performance (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value) for smartphone video-based diagnosis by experts and trainees (the index test) were compared with those for history and physical examination and video electroencephalogram monitoring (the reference standard). Results Forty-four eligible epilepsy clinic outpatients (31 women [70.5%]; mean [range] age, 45.1 [20-82] years) submitted smartphone videos (530 total physician reviews). Final video electroencephalogram diagnoses included 11 epileptic seizures, 30 psychogenic nonepileptic attacks, and 3 physiologic nonepileptic events. Expert interpretation of a smartphone video was accurate in predicting a video electroencephalogram monitoring diagnosis of epileptic seizures 89.1% (95% CI, 84.2%-92.9%) of the time, with a specificity of 93.3% (95% CI, 88.3%-96.6%). Resident responses were less accurate for all metrics involving epileptic seizures and psychogenic nonepileptic attacks, despite greater confidence. Motor signs during events increased accuracy. One-fourth of the smartphone videos were correctly diagnosed by 100% of the reviewing physicians, composed solely of psychogenic attacks. When histories and physical examination results were combined with smartphone videos, correct diagnoses rose from 78.6% to 95.2%. The odds of receiving a correct diagnosis were 5.45 times greater using smartphone video alongside patient history and physical examination results than with history and physical examination alone (95% CI, 1.01-54.3; P = .02). Conclusions and Relevance Outpatient smartphone video review by experts has predictive and additive value for diagnosing epileptic seizures. Smartphone videos may reliably aid psychogenic nonepileptic attacks diagnosis for some people.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Emily K Acton
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
| | - W Curt LaFrance
- Department of Neurology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Robert B Duckrow
- Department of Neurology, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - David K Chen
- Department of Neurology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew S Blum
- Department of Neurology, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - John D Hixson
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Tatum WO, Hirsch LJ, Gelfand MA, Acton EK, LaFrance WC, Duckrow RB, Chen D, Blum AS, Hixson J, Drazkowski J, Benbadis S, Cascino GD. Video quality using outpatient smartphone videos in epilepsy: Results from the OSmartViE study. Eur J Neurol 2021; 28:1453-1462. [PMID: 33465822 DOI: 10.1111/ene.14744] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 01/13/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality of smartphone videos (SVs) of neurologic events in adult epilepsy outpatients. The use of home video recording in patients with neurological disease states is increasing. Experts interpretation of outpatient smartphone videos of seizures and neurological events has demonstrated similar diagnostic accuracy to inpatient video-electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring. METHODS A prospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted to evaluate SV quality in patients with paroxysmal neurologic events from August 15, 2015 through August 31, 2018. Epileptic seizures (ESs), psychogenic nonepileptic attacks (PNEAs), and physiologic nonepileptic events (PhysNEEs) were confirmed by video-EEG monitoring. Experts and senior neurology residents blindly viewed cloud-based SVs without clinical information. Quality ratings with regard to technical and operator-driven metrics were provided in responses to a survey. RESULTS Forty-four patients (31 women, age 45.1 years [r = 20-82]) were included and 530 SVs were viewed by a mean of seven experts and six residents; one video per patient was reviewed for a mean of 133.8 s (r = 9-543). In all, 30 patients had PNEAs, 11 had ESs, and three had PhysNEEs. Quality was suitable in 70.8% of SVs (375/530 total views), with 36/44 (81.8%) patient SVs rated as adequate by the majority of reviewers. Accuracy improved with the presence of convulsive features from 72.4% to 98.2% in ESs and from 71.1% to 95.7% in PNEAs. An accurate diagnosis was given by all reviewers (100%) in 11/44 SVs (all PNEAs). Audio was rated as good by 86.2% of reviewers for these SVs compared with 75.4% for the remaining SVs (p = 0.01). Lighting was better in SVs associated with high accuracy (p = 0.06), but clarity was not (p = 0.59). Poor video quality yielded unknown diagnoses in 24.2% of the SVs reviewed. Features hindering diagnosis were limited interactivity, restricted field of view and short video duration. CONCLUSIONS Smartphone video quality is adequate for clinical interpretation in the majority of patients with paroxysmal neurologic events. Quality can be optimized by encouraging interactivity with the patient, adequate duration of the SV, and enlarged field of view during videography. Quality limitations were primarily operational though accuracy remained for SV review of ESs and PNEAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Michael A Gelfand
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Emily K Acton
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - W Curt LaFrance
- Department of Neurology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - David Chen
- Department of Neurology, Baylor University, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrew S Blum
- Department of Neurology, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA
| | - John Hixson
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Selim Benbadis
- Department of Neurology, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Sanderson JB, Yu JH, Liu DD, Amaya D, Lauro PM, D'Abreu A, Akbar U, Lee S, Asaad WF. Multi-Dimensional, Short-Timescale Quantification of Parkinson's Disease and Essential Tremor Motor Dysfunction. Front Neurol 2020; 11:886. [PMID: 33071924 PMCID: PMC7530842 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.00886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive movement disorder characterized by heterogenous motor dysfunction with fluctuations in severity. Objective, short-timescale characterization of this dysfunction is necessary as therapies become increasingly adaptive. Objectives: This study aims to characterize a novel, naturalistic, and goal-directed tablet-based task and complementary analysis protocol designed to characterize the motor features of PD. Methods: A total of 26 patients with PD and without deep brain stimulation (DBS), 20 control subjects, and eight patients with PD and with DBS completed the task. Eight metrics, each designed to capture an aspect of motor dysfunction in PD, were calculated from 1-second, non-overlapping epochs of the raw positional and pressure data captured during task completion. These metrics were used to generate a classifier using a support vector machine (SVM) model to produce a unifying, scalar “motor error score” (MES). The data generated from these patients with PD were compared to same-day standard clinical assessments. Additionally, these data were compared to analogous data generated from a separate group of 12 patients with essential tremor (ET) to assess the task's specificity for different movement disorders. Finally, an SVM model was generated for each of the eight patients with PD and with DBS to differentiate between their motor dysfunction in the “DBS On” and “DBS Off” stimulation states. Results: The eight metrics calculated from the raw positional and force data captured during task completion were non-redundant. MES generated by the SVM analysis protocol showed a strong correlation with MDS-UPDRS-III scores assigned by movement disorder specialists. Analysis of the relative contributions of each of the eight metrics showed a significant difference between the motor dysfunction of PD and ET. Much of this difference was attributable to the homogenous, tremor-dominant phenotype of ET motor dysfunction. Finally, in individual patients with PD with DBS, task performance and subsequent SVM classification effectively differentiated between the “DBS On” and “DBS Off” stimulation states. Conclusion: This tablet-based task and analysis protocol correlated strongly with expert clinical assessments of PD motor dysfunction. Additionally, the task showed specificity for PD when compared to ET, another common movement disorder. This specificity was driven by the relative heterogeneity of motor dysfunction of PD compared to ET. Finally, the task was able to distinguish between the “DBS On” and “DBS Off” states within single patients with PD. This task provides temporally-precise and specific information about motor dysfunction in at least two movement disorders that could feasibly correlate to neural activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John B Sanderson
- The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - James H Yu
- The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States
| | - David D Liu
- The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Daniel Amaya
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Peter M Lauro
- The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Anelyssa D'Abreu
- The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States.,Department of Neurology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Umer Akbar
- The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States.,Department of Neurology, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Shane Lee
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
| | - Wael F Asaad
- The Warren Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Department of Neurosurgery, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States.,Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown University, Providence, RI, United States.,Norman Prince Neurosciences Institute, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Pierce SK, Schwartzberg PL, Shah NN, Taylor N. Women in immunology: 2020 and beyond. Nat Immunol 2020; 21:254-258. [PMID: 32094649 DOI: 10.1038/s41590-020-0618-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Women have been at the forefront of tremendous achievements in immunology in the past decade. However, disparities still exist, limiting upward potential and further advancements. As four NIH intramural women scientists who care deeply about scientific progress and the progress of women in our field, we review ongoing challenges and discuss potential approaches to help advance the promotion of women in the sciences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan K Pierce
- Laboratory of Immunogenetics, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Pamela L Schwartzberg
- Laboratory of Immune System Biology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Nirali N Shah
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA.
| | - Naomi Taylor
- Pediatric Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA. .,IGMM, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, Montpellier, France.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Midaglia L, Mulero P, Montalban X, Graves J, Hauser SL, Julian L, Baker M, Schadrack J, Gossens C, Scotland A, Lipsmeier F, van Beek J, Bernasconi C, Belachew S, Lindemann M. Adherence and Satisfaction of Smartphone- and Smartwatch-Based Remote Active Testing and Passive Monitoring in People With Multiple Sclerosis: Nonrandomized Interventional Feasibility Study. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e14863. [PMID: 31471961 PMCID: PMC6743265 DOI: 10.2196/14863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 65] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2019] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Current clinical assessments of people with multiple sclerosis are episodic and may miss critical features of functional fluctuations between visits. Objective The goal of the research was to assess the feasibility of remote active testing and passive monitoring using smartphones and smartwatch technology in people with multiple sclerosis with respect to adherence and satisfaction with the FLOODLIGHT test battery. Methods People with multiple sclerosis (aged 20 to 57 years; Expanded Disability Status Scale 0-5.5; n=76) and healthy controls (n=25) performed the FLOODLIGHT test battery, comprising active tests (daily, weekly, every two weeks, or on demand) and passive monitoring (sensor-based gait and mobility) for 24 weeks using a smartphone and smartwatch. The primary analysis assessed adherence (proportion of weeks with at least 3 days of completed testing and 4 hours per day passive monitoring) and questionnaire-based satisfaction. In-clinic assessments (clinical and magnetic resonance imaging) were performed. Results People with multiple sclerosis showed 70% (16.68/24 weeks) adherence to active tests and 79% (18.89/24 weeks) to passive monitoring; satisfaction score was on average 73.7 out of 100. Neither adherence nor satisfaction was associated with specific population characteristics. Test-battery assessments had an at least acceptable impact on daily activities in over 80% (61/72) of people with multiple sclerosis. Conclusions People with multiple sclerosis were engaged and satisfied with the FLOODLIGHT test battery. FLOODLIGHT sensor-based measures may enable continuous assessment of multiple sclerosis disease in clinical trials and real-world settings. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02952911; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02952911
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luciana Midaglia
- Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,Department of Medicine, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Mulero
- Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Xavier Montalban
- Department of Neurology-Neuroimmunology, Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.,Division of Neurology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jennifer Graves
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Stephen L Hauser
- Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States
| | - Laura Julian
- Genentech Inc, South San Francisco, CA, United States
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Michael Lindemann
- F Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Basel, Switzerland.,Department of Economics, Baden-Wuerttemberg Cooperative State University, Loerrach, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Vinny PW, Gupta A, Modi M, Srivastava MVP, Lal V, Sylaja PN, Narasimhan L, Dwivedi SN, Nair PP, Iype T, Vishnu VY. Head to head comparison between neurology residents and a mobile medical application for diagnostic accuracy in cognitive neurology. QJM 2019; 112:591-598. [PMID: 31086976 DOI: 10.1093/qjmed/hcz106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Revised: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A novel Mobile Medical Application (App) App was created on iOS platform (Neurology Dx®) to deduce Differential Diagnoses (DDx) from a set of user selected Symptoms, Signs, Imaging data and Lab findings. The DDx generated by the App was compared for diagnostic accuracy with differentials reasoned by participating neurology residents when presented with same clinical vignettes. METHODS Hundred neurology residents in seven leading Neurology centers across India participated in this study. A panel of experts created 60 clinical vignettes of varying levels of difficulty related to Cognitive neurology. Each neurology resident was instructed to formulate DDx from a set of 15 cognitive neurology vignettes. Experts in Cognitive Neurology made the gold standard DDx answers to all 60 clinical vignettes. The differentials generated by the App and neurology residents were then compared with the Gold standard. RESULTS Sixty clinical vignettes were tested on 100 neurology residents (15 vignettes each) and also on the App (60 vignettes). The frequency of gold standard high likely answers accurately documented by the residents was 25% compared with 65% by the App (95% CI 33.1-46.3), P < 0.0001. Residents correctly identified the first high likely gold standard answer as their first high likely answer in 35% (95% CI 30.7-36.6) compared with 62% (95% CI 14.1-38.5), P < 0.0001. CONCLUSION An App with adequate knowledge-base and appropriate algorithm can augment and complement human diagnostic reasoning in drawing a comprehensive list of DDx in the field of Cognitive Neurology (CTRI/2017/06/008838).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - M Modi
- PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | | | - V Lal
- PGIMER, Chandigarh, India
| | | | | | | | | | - T Iype
- Government Medical College, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Boukhvalova AK, Fan O, Weideman AM, Harris T, Kowalczyk E, Pham L, Kosa P, Bielekova B. Smartphone Level Test Measures Disability in Several Neurological Domains for Patients With Multiple Sclerosis. Front Neurol 2019; 10:358. [PMID: 31191424 PMCID: PMC6546929 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.00358] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2019] [Accepted: 03/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Our long-term goal is to employ smartphone-embedded sensors to measure various neurological functions in a patient-autonomous manner. The interim goal is to develop simple smartphone tests (apps) and evaluate the clinical utility of these tests by selecting optimal outcomes that correlate well with clinician-measured disability in different neurological domains. In this paper, we used prospectively-acquired data from 112 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients and 15 healthy volunteers (HV) to assess the performance and optimize outcomes of a Level Test. The goal of the test is to tilt the smartphone so that a free-rolling ball travels to and remains in the center of the screen. An accelerometer detects tilting and records the coordinates of the ball at set time intervals. From this data, we derived five features: path length traveled, time spent in the center of the screen, average distance from the center, average speed while in the center, and number of direction changes underwent by the ball. Time in center proved to be the most sensitive feature to differentiate MS patients from HV and had the strongest correlations with clinician-derived scales. Its superiority was validated in an independent validation cohort of 29 MS patients. A linear combination of different Level features failed to outperform time in center in an independent validation cohort. Limited longitudinal data demonstrated that the Level features were relatively stable intra-individually within 4 months, without definitive evidence of learning. In contrast to previously developed smartphone tests that predominantly measure motoric functions, Level features correlated strongly with reaction time and moderately with cerebellar functions and proprioception, validating its complementary clinical value in the MS app suite. The Level Test measures neurological disability in several domains in two independent cross-sectional cohorts (original and validation). An ongoing longitudinal cohort further investigates whether patient-autonomous collection of granular functional data allows measurement of patient-specific trajectories of disability progression to better guide treatment decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra K Boukhvalova
- Neuroimmunological Diseases Section, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Olivia Fan
- Neuroimmunological Diseases Section, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Ann Marie Weideman
- Neuroimmunological Diseases Section, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Thomas Harris
- Neuroimmunological Diseases Section, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Emily Kowalczyk
- Neuroimmunological Diseases Section, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States.,Department of Computer Science, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States
| | - Linh Pham
- Neuroimmunological Diseases Section, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Peter Kosa
- Neuroimmunological Diseases Section, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Bibiana Bielekova
- Neuroimmunological Diseases Section, Laboratory of Clinical Immunology and Microbiology, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Bethesda, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|