1
|
Salisbury DB, Parrott D, Walters GJ, McGrath C, Logan DM, Altman IM, Malec JF. Outcomes of Six Specific Types of Post-Hospital Brain Injury Rehabilitation Programs. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2025; 40:27-37. [PMID: 38916445 DOI: 10.1097/htr.0000000000000980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/26/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate outcomes of intensive posthospital brain injury rehabilitation programs compared to supported living (SL) programs; explore variations in outcome by diagnostic category (traumatic brain injury, stroke, and other acquired brain injury [ABI]) and specific program type. SETTING Data were obtained from Residential Neurobehavioral, Residential Neurorehabilitation, Home and Community Neurorehabilitation, Day Treatment, Outpatient Neurorehabilitation, and SL programs serving individuals with ABI. PARTICIPANTS A total of 2120 individuals with traumatic brain injury, stroke, or other ABI participated in this study. MAIN MEASURES The main measures are sex, age, time since injury, and Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory (4th edition; MPAI-4). DESIGN Retrospective analyses of demographic variables and MPAI-4 Total, index, and subscale Rasch-derived T-scores on admission and discharge. RESULTS Gains on MPAI-4 Total T-scores were significantly greater for the intensive rehabilitation (IR) group in comparison to stable functioning in the SL group ( F = 236.69, P < .001, partial η 2 = .101) while controlling for admission/time 1 scores; similar results were found for MPAI-4 indices and subscales. For the IR cohort, discharge scores differed by diagnostic category after controlling for admission scores for the Total MPAI-4 T-score ( F = 22.65, P < .001, partial η 2 = .025), as well as all indices and subscales. A statistically significant interaction between program type and diagnostic group on discharge MPAI-4 Total T-scores ( F = 2.55, P = .018, partial η 2 = .01) after controlling for admission scores indicated that differing outcomes across diagnoses also varied by program type. Varying significant main effects and interactions were apparent for MPAI-4 indices and subscales with generally small effect sizes. CONCLUSIONS Significant gains on MPAI-4 variables across IR program types compared to no change over a comparable period of time for SL programs supports the effectiveness of posthospital brain injury rehabilitation. This finding in the presence of small effect sizes on outcome variables for program type and for significant interactions between program type and diagnostic category suggests that participants generally were appropriately matched to program type and benefited from interventions provided through specific program types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Salisbury
- Author Affiliations: Director of Clinical Operations, Pate NeuroRehabilitation/Rehab Without Walls, Irving, Texas (Dr Salisbury); Data Scientist, Foundation to Advance Brain Rehabilitation (FABR), Wilmington, Delaware, and Associate Research Professor, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana (Dr Parrott); Director of Analytics, On With Life, Ankeny, Iowa (Mr Walters); Senior Director of Clinical Services Bancroft NeuroRehab, Cherry Hill, New Jersey (Dr McGrath); Director of Performance Improvement and Quality Management, On With Life, Ankeny, Iowa (Mr Logan); National Director of Outcomes, Collage Rehabilitation Partners, Paoli, Pennsylvania (Dr Altman); and Chief Scientific Officer, Foundation to Advance Brain Rehabilitation (FABR), Wilmington, Delaware, Senior Research Professor Emeritus, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, and Emeritus Professor of Psychology, Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Dr Malec)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Røe C, Gutenbrunner C, Bökel A, Kirkevold M, Nugraha B, Andelic N, Lu J, Bautz-Holter E, Perrin PB, Anke A, Jahnsen R, Månum G, Howe E, Kildal Bragstad L, Soberg HL. Proposed categories for reporting of service organization in rehabilitation in clinical trials: a discussion paper. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2024; 60:1070-1077. [PMID: 39374051 PMCID: PMC11729722 DOI: 10.23736/s1973-9087.24.08494-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2024] [Revised: 09/05/2024] [Accepted: 09/19/2024] [Indexed: 10/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The lack of standardized reporting for crucial organizational factors in rehabilitation poses a significant barrier to understanding their impact on patient outcomes in clinical trials and meta-analyses. AIM Based on the categories in the International Classification of Service Organization in Rehabilitation (ICSO-R 2.0), we aimed to develop reporting standards specifically for organizational factors in clinical trials. METHODS A comprehensive two-step process was conducted. In Step 1, important categories were identified. The identification was based on previous results from a Delphi survey with international stakeholder participation, two systematic literature reviews and results from focus groups with users in Germany, Indonesia and Norway. Step 2 involved the necessary reduction of categories and the proposal of reporting specifications, achieved through two voting rounds among key researchers, stakeholders and users. RESULTS The suggested minimum reporting set comprises Context and Setting as well as Quality assurance and management. The Context and Setting is proposed to include whether the intervention is delivered by Hospital, Community or Other service providers. The Mode of delivery is proposed to be specified as Inpatient, Outpatient, In-home, or Tele-rehabilitation. Furthermore, the Level of specialization (Primary/Secondary) and the Phase of service delivery Acute, Subacute or Long-term rehabilitation services should be reported. The Quality assurance and management should be reported as Yes or No, with the option Yes requiring description of the quality assurance applied in the methods section. CONCLUSIONS This study proposed a compulsory and standardized reporting of organizational factors in clinical trials to facilitate the generation of scientific evidence regarding effective service provision and delivery in rehabilitation medicine. Authors are encouraged to consider the proposed reporting set to testing, criticism, and modification to enhance its applicability and robustness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilie Røe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Oslo, Oslo, Norway -
- Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway -
| | - Christoph Gutenbrunner
- Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Andrea Bökel
- Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Marit Kirkevold
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Boya Nugraha
- Department of Rehabilitation and Sports Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
- HRScon, Hannover, Germany
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Juan Lu
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Population Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Erik Bautz-Holter
- Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Paul B Perrin
- School of Data Science and Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - Audny Anke
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Department of Rehabilitation, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Reidun Jahnsen
- Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Beitostølen Healthsports Center, Beitostølen, Norway
| | - Grethe Månum
- Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Emilie Howe
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Line Kildal Bragstad
- Research Center for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Helene L Soberg
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University Hospital of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bergquist TF, Kew CL, Wisinger AM. Traumatic Brain Injury. Neurol Clin 2024; 42:863-874. [PMID: 39343480 DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2024.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/01/2024]
Abstract
Advances in trauma care have allowed persons with traumatic brain injury to survive at increasingly greater rates. However, they commonly go on to experience complex symptoms including changes in cognitive, emotional, and behavioral functioning that together limit functioning and quality of life. Clinical neuropsychology is uniquely skilled to work together with other rehabilitation professionals, using a patient centered approach, evidence-based treatments, and increasingly using emerging technology while adhering to ethical principles of respect, beneficence, and justice. Doing so will most effectively manage these changes, leading to the best possible quality of life and maximum improvement in functioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas F Bergquist
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic Rochester, 200 First Street Southwest, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Chung Lin Kew
- School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, 212 Adriance Lab, College Station, TX 77843, USA
| | - Amanda M Wisinger
- Department of Neuropsychology, TIRR Memorial Hermann/UTHealth Houston, 1333 Moursund Street, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Borysova I, Fesenko A, Fesenko H, Potapova T, Kirichenko A, Chub D. International classification of functioning, disability and health with long-term consequences of cranio-brain injury. WIADOMOSCI LEKARSKIE (WARSAW, POLAND : 1960) 2024; 77:29-34. [PMID: 38431804 DOI: 10.36740/wlek202401104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Aim: To describe health status and related functioning of patients with different severity of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in past medical history in Ukraine and determining the feasibility of using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) Brief Core Set for TBI. PATIENTS AND METHODS Materials and Methods: A total of 102 patients, who were treated in the neurological department of Dnipropetrovsk regional clinical hospital and State Institution ≪Ukrainian State Scientific Research Institute of Medical and Social Problems of Disability of Health Ministry of Ukraine≫, had been examined. Patients were divided into three groups: mild, moderate and severe TBI in past history and evaluated using ICF Brief Core Set for TBI. RESULTS Results: Тhe most common problems in the functioning and health of patients in remote period of TBI, along with the influencing factors have been identified in the study. The most frequent categories from ≪Body Functions≫ and ≪Activity and Participation≫ sections in which patients had alterations were: memory functions, emotional functions, sensation of pain, functions of attention, brain structure, complex interpersonal interactions, family relationships. The increase in the amount and severity of disturbances with increasing severity of TBI had been established in all categories, except complex interpersonal interactions and family relationships. CONCLUSION Conclusions: Patients of all groups identified the family and close relatives, healthcare service and social welfare services, as the most frequent relieving factors of life activity. The use of the ICF Brief Core Set for assessing the subjects with TBI in past history provides a convenient procedure to standardize and structure functioning description. Information collected by the ICF Brief Core Set may be used for different purposes: clinical assessment, administration of medical services, planning and implementation of rehabilitation and evaluation of results, in scientific research, reports and health care statistics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Alla Kirichenko
- STATE INSTITUTION SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL AND SOCIAL PROBLEMS OF DISABILITY, DNIPRO, UKRAINE
| | - Daria Chub
- DNIPRO STATE MEDICAL UNIVERSITY, DNIPRO, UKRAINE
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
von Steinbuechel N, Hahm S, Muehlan H, Arango-Lasprilla JC, Bockhop F, Covic A, Schmidt S, Steyerberg EW, Maas AIR, Menon D, Andelic N, Zeldovich M. Impact of Sociodemographic, Premorbid, and Injury-Related Factors on Patient-Reported Outcome Trajectories after Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI). J Clin Med 2023; 12:2246. [PMID: 36983247 PMCID: PMC10052290 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12062246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains one of the leading causes of death and disability worldwide. To better understand its impact on various outcome domains, this study pursues the following: (1) longitudinal outcome assessments at three, six, and twelve months post-injury; (2) an evaluation of sociodemographic, premorbid, and injury-related factors, and functional recovery contributing to worsening or improving outcomes after TBI. Using patient-reported outcome measures, recuperation trends after TBI were identified by applying Multivariate Latent Class Mixed Models (MLCMM). Instruments were grouped into TBI-specific and generic health-related quality of life (HRQoL; QOLIBRI-OS, SF-12v2), and psychological and post-concussion symptoms (GAD-7, PHQ-9, PCL-5, RPQ). Multinomial logistic regressions were carried out to identify contributing factors. For both outcome sets, the four-class solution provided the best match between goodness of fit indices and meaningful clinical interpretability. Both models revealed similar trajectory classes: stable good health status (HRQoL: n = 1944; symptoms: n = 1963), persistent health impairments (HRQoL: n = 442; symptoms: n = 179), improving health status (HRQoL: n = 83; symptoms: n = 243), and deteriorating health status (HRQoL: n = 86; symptoms: n = 170). Compared to individuals with stable good health status, the other groups were more likely to have a lower functional recovery status at three months after TBI (i.e., the GOSE), psychological problems, and a lower educational attainment. Outcome trajectories after TBI show clearly distinguishable patterns which are reproducible across different measures. Individuals characterized by persistent health impairments and deterioration require special attention and long-term clinical monitoring and therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole von Steinbuechel
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Goettingen, Germany
| | - Stefanie Hahm
- Department Health & Prevention, Institute of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Robert-Blum-Str. 13, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Holger Muehlan
- Department Health & Prevention, Institute of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Robert-Blum-Str. 13, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Juan Carlos Arango-Lasprilla
- Departments of Psychology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, 907 Floyd Ave., Richmond, VA 23284, USA
| | - Fabian Bockhop
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Goettingen, Germany
| | - Amra Covic
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Goettingen, Germany
| | - Silke Schmidt
- Department Health & Prevention, Institute of Psychology, University of Greifswald, Robert-Blum-Str. 13, 17489 Greifswald, Germany
| | - Ewout W. Steyerberg
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Leiden University Medical Center, 2333 RC Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew I. R. Maas
- Department of Neurosurgery, Antwerp University Hospital and University of Antwerp, 2650 Edegem, Belgium
| | - David Menon
- Division of Anaesthesia, University of Cambridge/Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Box 157, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - Nada Andelic
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, 0450 Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Health and Society, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models, Faculty of Medicine, Univeristy of Oslo, 0373 Oslo, Norway
| | - Marina Zeldovich
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Medical Sociology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Waldweg 37A, 37073 Goettingen, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guerrette MC, McKerral M. Predictors of Social Participation Outcome after Traumatic Brain Injury Differ According to Rehabilitation Pathways. J Neurotrauma 2023; 40:523-535. [PMID: 35974662 DOI: 10.1089/neu.2022.0232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Social participation (SP) is one of many objectives in the rehabilitation of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Studies on predictors of SP specific to post-acute universally accessible specialized rehabilitation pathways following TBI are scarce. Our objectives were to: 1) characterize SP, as well as a set of pre-injury, injury-related, and post-injury variables in individuals participating in inpatient-outpatient or outpatient rehabilitation pathways within a universally accessible and organized trauma continuum of care; and 2) examine the ability of pre-injury, injury-related, and post-injury variables in predicting SP outcome after TBI according to rehabilitation path. Participants (N = 372) were adults admitted to an inpatient-outpatient rehabilitation pathway or an outpatient rehabilitation pathway after sustaining a TBI between 2016 and 2020, and for whom Mayo-Portland Adaptability Intentory-4 (MPAI-4) outcomes were prospectively obtained at the start and end of rehabilitation. Additional data was collected from medical files. For both rehabilitation pathways, predicted SP outcome was MPAI-4 Participation score at discharge from outpatient rehabilitation. Multiple regression models investigated the predictive value of each variable for SP outcome, separately for each care pathway. Main findings show that for the inpatient-outpatient sample, three variables (education years, MPAI-4 Ability and Adjustment scores at rehabilitation intake) significantly predicted SP outcome, with the regression model accounting for 49% of the variance. For the outpatient sample, five variables (pre-morbid hypertension and mental health diagnosis, total indirect rehabilitation hours received, MPAI-4 Abilities and Adjustment scores at rehabilitation intake) significantly predicted SP outcome, with the regression model accounting for 47% of the variance. In conclusion, different pre-morbid and post-injury variables are involved in predicting SP, depending on the rehabilitation path followed. The predictive value of those variables could help clinicians identify patients more likely of showing poorer SP at discharge and who may require additional or different interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Claude Guerrette
- Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal-IURDPM, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Michelle McKerral
- Department of Psychology, Université de Montréal, Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation of Greater Montreal-IURDPM, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Choi T, Heo S, Choi W, Lee S. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Virtual Reality-Based Rehabilitation Therapy on Reducing the Degree of Pain Experienced by Individuals with Low Back Pain. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:3502. [PMID: 36834197 PMCID: PMC9958662 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20043502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The concept of virtual reality (VR)-based rehabilitation therapy for treating people with low back pain is of growing research interest. However, the effectiveness of such therapy for pain reduction in clinical settings remains controversial. METHODS The present study was conducted according to the reporting guidelines presented in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement. We searched the PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, and ProQuest databases for both published and unpublished papers. The Cochrane risk of bias tool (version 2) was used to evaluate the quality of the selected studies. GRADEprofiler software (version 3.6.4) was used to evaluate the level of evidence. We analyzed the included research results using RevMan software (version 5.4.1). RESULTS We included a total of 11 articles in the systematic review and meta-analysis, with a total of 1761 subjects. Having assessed the quality of these studies, the risk of bias was generally low with high heterogeneity. The results revealed a small to medium effect (standardized mean difference = ±0.37, 95% confidence interval: 0.75 to 0) based on evidence of moderate overall quality. CONCLUSION There is evidence that treatment using VR improves patients' pain. The effect size was small to medium, with the studies presenting evidence of moderate overall quality. VR-based treatment can reduce pain; therefore, it may help in rehabilitation therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taeseok Choi
- Department of Physical Therapy, Howon University, Gunsan 54058, Republic of Korea
| | - Seoyoon Heo
- Department of Occupational Therapy, Kyungbok University, Namyangju 11138, Republic of Korea
| | - Wansuk Choi
- Department of Physical Therapy, International University of Korea, Jinju 17731, Republic of Korea
| | - Sangbin Lee
- Department of Physical Therapy, Namseoul University, Cheonan 31020, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Borg DN, Bon JJ, Foster MM, Lakhani A, Kendall M, Geraghty T. Healthcare services for people with acquired disability in South-East Queensland, Australia: Assessing potential proximity and its association with service obstacles. SSM Popul Health 2022; 19:101209. [PMID: 36052155 PMCID: PMC9424535 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2022.101209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
This study described access potential in South-East Queensland, to healthcare services commonly used by people with acquired disability; and investigated the association between service proximity and perceived service obstacles. First, we described accessibility by conducting a spatial analysis to create maps of potential accessibility to health services in South-East Queensland. Queensland statistical area level 2 (SA2) locations were combined with the residential locations of participants from a longitudinal cohort study involving people with ABI and SCI. The locations of selected health services of interest were identified from Health Direct's National Health Service Directory. Travel times via motor vehicle were modelled with Robust Gaussian Stochastic Process, to smoothly interpolate between the sparse time-to-service observations. Probabilistic predicted values were generated from the model and were used to construct service accessibility maps of South-East Queensland. Disability population data were used to identify SA2s with relatively low service access but a high disability population. Second, we examined perceived service obstacles, by investigating the relationship between potential access to services and perceived service obstacles was examined using data from 63 people with ABI or SCI discharged from the specialist state-wide rehabilitation services, located in South-East Queensland. Obstacles to accessing service in relation to resource availability, transportation and finances were collected three-months after discharge, using the Service Obstacle Scale. Travel times to the closest health service were computed for each individual and were compared to their Service Obstacle Scale responses. Access potential was highly variable, particularly for allied health services. We identified several low-access, high-disability population areas. These hotpots of poor access were generally to the north and west of greater Brisbane. Longer travel times to allied health services were associated with 260% higher odds of agreeing that resource availability was an obstacle to accessing services. Policy makers should be concerned with the hotspots of poor access identified. There was considerable variability in access potential, which was generally greater for allied health than medical specialist services. We highlighted low-access high disability population areas, which were generally in outer suburbia. Poorer potential access to allied health services was associated with resource availability being rated as an service obstacle. We did not find any evidence that proximity to allied health services was associated with transportation or finance obstacles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David N Borg
- The Hopkins Centre: Research for Rehabilitation and Resilience, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Joshua J Bon
- The Hopkins Centre: Research for Rehabilitation and Resilience, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Australia.,Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Mathematical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, St Lucia, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Michele M Foster
- The Hopkins Centre: Research for Rehabilitation and Resilience, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Ali Lakhani
- The Hopkins Centre: Research for Rehabilitation and Resilience, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Australia.,School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia.,La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Melissa Kendall
- The Hopkins Centre: Research for Rehabilitation and Resilience, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Australia.,Division of Rehabilitation, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Timothy Geraghty
- The Hopkins Centre: Research for Rehabilitation and Resilience, Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Nathan, Brisbane, Australia.,Division of Rehabilitation, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Health Hospital and Health Service, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Gerber KS, Alvarez G, Alamian A, Behar-Zusman V, Downs CA. Biomarkers of Neuroinflammation in Traumatic Brain Injury. Clin Nurs Res 2022; 31:1203-1218. [PMID: 35770330 DOI: 10.1177/10547738221107081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is characterized by neuroinflammation and structural damage leading to symptoms and altered brain function. Biomarkers are useful in understanding neuroinflammation and correlations with TBI sequalae. The purpose of this paper is to identify and discuss biomarkers of neuroinflammation used to study TBI and its sequalae. A systematic review was conducted using PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Web of Science. A total of 350 articles met criteria; 70 used biomarkers. PRISMA criteria were used for Quality Assessment. Articles included reviews (n = 17), case-control (n = 25), cross-sectional (n = 25) studies, and randomized controlled trials (n = 3). Twenty-seven biomarkers were identified, including inflammasomes, cytokines, neuropeptides, complement complexes, miRNA and exosomes, and glial cell-specific proteins. Biomarkers aid in predicting morbidity and mortality and advance our understanding of neuroinflammation in TBI. This systematic review advances our understanding of the neuroinflammatory response to better enable nurses and clinicians to provide informed care of TBI patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn S Gerber
- University of Miami School of Nursing and Health Studies, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| | - Gema Alvarez
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, FL, USA
| | - Arsham Alamian
- University of Miami School of Nursing and Health Studies, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| | | | - Charles A Downs
- University of Miami School of Nursing and Health Studies, Coral Gables, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Røe C, Bautz-Holter E, Andelic N, Søberg HL, Nugraha B, Gutenbrunner C, Boekel A, Kirkevold M, Engen G, Lu J. Organization of rehabilitation services in randomized controlled trials - which factors influence functional outcome? A systematic review. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl 2022; 4:100197. [PMID: 35756983 PMCID: PMC9214333 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2022.100197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To identify factors related to the organization of rehabilitation services that may influence patients’ functional outcome and make recommendations for categories to be used in the reporting of rehabilitation interventions. Data Sources A systematic review based on a search in MEDLINE indexed journals (MEDLINE [OVID], Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) until June 2019. Study Selection In total 8587 candidate randomized controlled trials reporting on organizational factors of multidisciplinary rehabilitation interventions and their associations with functional outcome. An additional 1534 trials were identified from June 2019 to March 2021. Data Extraction: Quality evaluation was conducted by 2 independent researchers. The organizational factors were classified according to the International Classification for Service Organization in Health-related Rehabilitation 2.0. Data Synthesis In total 80 articles fulfilled the inclusion criteria. There was a great heterogeneity in the terminology and reporting of service organization across all studies. Aspects of Settings including the Mode of Service Delivery was the most explicitly analyzed organizational category (44 studies). The importance of the integration of rehabilitation in the inpatient services was supported. Furthermore, several studies documented a lack of difference in outcome between outpatient vs inpatient service delivery. Patient Centeredness, Integration of Care, and Time and Intensity factors were also analyzed, but heterogeneity of interventions in these studies prohibited aggregation of results. Conclusions Settings and in particular the way the services were delivered to the users influenced functional outcome. Hence, it should be compulsory to include a standardized reporting of aspects of service delivery in clinical trials. We would also advise further standardization in the description of organizational factors in rehabilitation interventions to build knowledge of effective service organization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cecilie Røe
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Corresponding author Cecilie Røe, Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway, P.O. Box 1089, Blidern, 0319 Oslo, Norway.
| | - Erik Bautz-Holter
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Nada Andelic
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Helene Lundgaard Søberg
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Boya Nugraha
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | | | - Andrea Boekel
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hanover, Germany
| | - Marit Kirkevold
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet University, Oslo, Norway
| | - Grace Engen
- Research Centre for Habilitation and Rehabilitation Models and Services (CHARM), Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Juan Lu
- Department of Family Medicine and Population Health, Division of Epidemiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Right people, right time? a qualitative study of service access experiences of adults with acquired brain injury following discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. BRAIN IMPAIR 2020. [DOI: 10.1017/brimp.2020.12] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
AbstractPurpose:The intention of this paper is to develop the personal concept of appropriate access. We report on the service access experiences and opportunities of adults with an acquired brain injury after leaving inpatient rehabilitation. The benefits of appropriate access underpin standards in early and long-term recovery, though users’ access needs are highly personal.Methods:The study used a qualitative design involving 16 semi-structured interviews with Australian adults with an acquired brain injury after discharge from inpatient brain rehabilitation. Data were thematically analysed.Results:Three main themes were derived from the analysis. Theme 1 shows that participants valued being steered to services that providers thought appropriate for them early after discharge from inpatient rehabilitation. Theme 2 highlights the tensions between timing and personal recovery and perceived needs. Theme 3 captures participants’ insights into the challenges of gaining access vis-a-vis what the system offers and the enablers of actualising appropriate access.Conclusion:The positive experiences of being directed to specialist services early after discharge suggest that continuity of care constitutes appropriateness of access for participants in this study. However, it is also clear that continuity should not displace flexibility in the timing of services, to accord with individuals’ perceived needs. This, in addition to enablement of access opportunities, through funding and transport, are important in maintaining a personalised approach.
Collapse
|
12
|
Naess HL, Vikane E, Wehling EI, Skouen JS, Bell RF, Johnsen LG. Effect of Early Interdisciplinary Rehabilitation for Trauma Patients: A Systematic Review. Arch Rehabil Res Clin Transl 2020; 2:100070. [PMID: 33543097 PMCID: PMC7853396 DOI: 10.1016/j.arrct.2020.100070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To perform a systematic review to assess the current scientific evidence concerning the effect of EIR for trauma patients with or without an associated traumatic brain injury. Data Source We performed a systematic search of several electronic (Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, and SveMed+) and 2 clinical trial registers (clinicaltrials.gov and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform). In addition, we handsearched reference lists from relevant studies. Data Extraction Two review authors independently identified studies that were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcome measures were functional-related outcomes and return to work. The secondary outcome measures were length of stay in hospital, number of days on respirator, complication rate, physical and mental health measures, quality of life, and socioeconomic costs. Data Synthesis Four studies with a total number of 409 subjects, all with traumatic brain–associated injuries, were included in this review. The included trials varied considerably in study design, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and had small numbers of participants. All studies were judged to have at least 1 high risk of bias. We found the quality of evidence, for both our primary and secondary outcomes, low. Conclusions No studies that matched our inclusion criteria for EIR for trauma patients without traumatic brain injuries could be found. For traumatic brain injuries, there are a limited number of studies demonstrating that EIR has a positive effect on functional outcomes and socioeconomic costs. This review highlights the need for further research in trauma care regarding early phase interdisciplinary rehabilitation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanne Langseth Naess
- Regional Trauma Center, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Eirik Vikane
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Eike Ines Wehling
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Biological and Medicine Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Jan Sture Skouen
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.,Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Rae Frances Bell
- Regional Centre of Excellence in Palliative Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lars Gunnar Johnsen
- Department of Neuromedicine and Movement Science, University of Trondheim, Trondheim, Norway.,Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Trauma, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Malone C, Erler KS, Giacino JT, Hammond FM, Juengst SB, Locascio JJ, Nakase-Richardson R, Verduzco-Gutierrez M, Whyte J, Zasler N, Bodien YG. Participation Following Inpatient Rehabilitation for Traumatic Disorders of Consciousness: A TBI Model Systems Study. Front Neurol 2019; 10:1314. [PMID: 31920935 PMCID: PMC6930171 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2019.01314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) may result in a disorder of consciousness (DoC) and lead to substantial long-term disability. While level of independence with activities of daily living, especially for persons who recover consciousness during inpatient rehabilitation, generally improves over time, the degree of change in participation remains unknown. We determined level of participation among persons with TBI between 2005 and 2017 who were admitted to inpatient rehabilitation unable to follow commands and subsequently enrolled in the TBI Model Systems National Database. Participation on the Participation Assessment with Recombined Tools-Objective (PART-O) Productivity, Social Relations, and Out and About subscales was evaluated at 1-5 years post-injury. We used a mixed-effects model to longitudinally compare participation between persons who did and did not regain command-following during inpatient rehabilitation. We further explored the level of participation associated with increasing levels of functional independence (FIM). The analysis included 333 persons (229 recovered command-following during rehabilitation, mean age = 35.46 years, 74.9% male). Participation across groups, at all follow-up time points, on all PART-O subscales, was remarkably low (mean range = 0.021-1.91, maximum possible score = 5). Performance was highest on the Social Relations subscale and lowest on the Productivity subscale. Longitudinal analyses revealed no difference in level of participation or change in participation across time for persons who regained command-following during rehabilitation compared to those who did not. While productivity increased over time, social participation did not and participation outside the home increased more for younger than for older persons. Across all three PART-O subscales, FIM Motor scores positively predicted participation. FIM Cognitive scores positively predicted level of participation on the Productivity and Social Relations subscales. Exploratory analyses revealed that even persons who achieved independence on the FIM Motor and Cognitive subscales had low levels of participation across domains and follow-up years. In summary, persons with severe TBI who were admitted to inpatient rehabilitation unable to follow commands were found to be unlikely to participate in productive tasks, social endeavors, or activities outside of the home up to 5 years post-injury, even if functional independence was recovered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher Malone
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,Neurorehabilitation Laboratory, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Kimberly S Erler
- Department of Occupational Therapy, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Joseph T Giacino
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,Neurorehabilitation Laboratory, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Flora M Hammond
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Shannon B Juengst
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
| | - Joseph J Locascio
- Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| | - Risa Nakase-Richardson
- Mental Health and Behavioral Science, Defense and Veterans Brain Injury Center, James A. Haley Veterans Hospital, Tampa, FL, United States.,Division of Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, United States
| | - Monica Verduzco-Gutierrez
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, McGovern Medical School at the University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, and TIRR Memorial Hermann, Houston, TX, United States
| | - John Whyte
- Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, United States
| | - Nathan Zasler
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Concussion Care Centre of Virginia, Ltd. and Tree of Life Services, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Yelena G Bodien
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.,Neurorehabilitation Laboratory, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Boston, MA, United States.,Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|