Transfer Function Models for the Localization of Seizure Onset Zone From Cortico-Cortical Evoked Potentials

Network excitability of stimulation-induced spectral responses helps localize the seizure onset zone

OBJECTIVE

While evoked potentials elicited by single pulse electrical stimulation (SPES) may assist seizure onset zone (SOZ) localization during intracranial EEG (iEEG) monitoring, induced high frequency activity has also shown promising utility. We aimed to predict SOZ sites using induced cortico-cortical spectral responses (CCSRs) as an index of excitability within epileptogenic networks.

METHODS

SPES was conducted in 27 epilepsy patients undergoing iEEG monitoring and CCSRs were quantified by significant early (10-200 ms) increases in power from 10 to 250 Hz. Using response power as CCSR network connection strengths, graph centrality measures (metrics quantifying each site's influence within the network) were used to predict whether sites were within the SOZ.

RESULTS

Across patients with successful surgical outcomes, greater CCSR centrality predicted SOZ sites and SOZ sites targeted for surgical treatment with median AUCs of 0.85 and 0.91, respectively. We found that the alignment between predicted and targeted SOZ sites predicted surgical outcome with an AUC of 0.79.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings indicate that network analysis of CCSRs can be used to identify increased excitability of SOZ sites and discriminate important surgical targets within the SOZ.

SIGNIFICANCE

CCSRs may supplement traditional passive iEEG monitoring in seizure localization, potentially reducing the need for recording numerous seizures.

Virtual stimulation of the interictal EEG network localizes the EZ as a measure of cortical excitability

Introduction: For patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, successful localization and surgical treatment of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) can bring seizure freedom. However, surgical success rates vary widely because there are currently no clinically validated biomarkers of the EZ. Highly epileptogenic regions often display increased levels of cortical excitability, which can be probed using single-pulse electrical stimulation (SPES), where brief pulses of electrical current are delivered to brain tissue. It has been shown that high-amplitude responses to SPES can localize EZ regions, indicating a decreased threshold of excitability. However, performing extensive SPES in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU) is time-consuming. Thus, we built patient-specific in silico dynamical network models from interictal intracranial EEG (iEEG) to test whether virtual stimulation could reveal information about the underlying network to identify highly excitable brain regions similar to physical stimulation of the brain. Methods: We performed virtual stimulation in 69 patients that were evaluated at five centers and assessed for clinical outcome 1 year post surgery. We further investigated differences in observed SPES iEEG responses of 14 patients stratified by surgical outcome. Results: Clinically-labeled EZ cortical regions exhibited higher excitability from virtual stimulation than non-EZ regions with most significant differences in successful patients and little difference in failure patients. These trends were also observed in responses to extensive SPES performed in the EMU. Finally, when excitability was used to predict whether a channel is in the EZ or not, the classifier achieved an accuracy of 91%. Discussion: This study demonstrates how excitability determined via virtual stimulation can capture valuable information about the EZ from interictal intracranial EEG.

Localizing seizure onset zone by a cortico-cortical evoked potentials-based machine learning approach in focal epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to develop a new approach for identifying the localization of the seizure onset zone (SOZ) based on corticocortical evoked potentials (CCEPs) and to compare the connectivity patterns in patients with different clinical phenotypes.

METHODS

Fifty patients who underwent stereoelectroencephalography and CCEP procedures were included. Logistic regression was used in the model, and six CCEP metrics were input as features: root mean square of the first peak (N1RMS) and second peak (N2RMS), peak latency, onset latency, width duration, and area.

RESULTS

The area under the curve (AUC) for localizing the SOZ ranged from 0.88 to 0.93. The N1RMS values in the hippocampus sclerosis (HS) group were greater than that of the focal cortical dysplasia (FCD) IIa group (p < 0.001), independent of the distance between the recorded and stimulated sites. The sensitivity of localization was higher in the seizure-free group than in the non-seizure-free group (p = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

This new method can be used to predict the SOZ localization in various focal epilepsy phenotypes.

SIGNIFICANCE

This study proposed a machine-learning approach for localizing the SOZ. Moreover, we examined how clinical phenotypes impact large-scale abnormality of the epileptogenic networks.

Passive and active markers of cortical excitability in epilepsy

Electroencephalography (EEG) has been the primary diagnostic tool in clinical epilepsy for nearly a century. Its review is performed using qualitative clinical methods that have changed little over time. However, the intersection of higher resolution digital EEG and analytical tools developed in the past decade invites a re-exploration of relevant methodology. In addition to the established spatial and temporal markers of spikes and high-frequency oscillations, novel markers involving advanced postprocessing and active probing of the interictal EEG are gaining ground. This review provides an overview of the EEG-based passive and active markers of cortical excitability in epilepsy and of the techniques developed to facilitate their identification. Several different emerging tools are discussed in the context of specific EEG applications and the barriers we must overcome to translate these tools into clinical practice.

Stimulation to probe, excite, and inhibit the epileptic brain

Direct cortical stimulation has been applied in epilepsy for nearly a century and has experienced a renaissance, given unprecedented opportunities to probe, excite, and inhibit the human brain. Evidence suggests stimulation can increase diagnostic and therapeutic utility in patients with drug-resistant epilepsies. However, choosing appropriate stimulation parameters is not a trivial issue, and is further complicated by epilepsy being characterized by complex brain state dynamics. In this article derived from discussions at the ICTALS 2022 Conference (International Conference on Technology and Analysis for Seizures), we succinctly review the literature on cortical stimulation applied acutely and chronically to the epileptic brain for localization, monitoring, and therapeutic purposes. In particular, we discuss how stimulation is used to probe brain excitability, discuss evidence on the usefulness of stimulation to trigger and stop seizures, review therapeutic applications of stimulation, and finally discuss how stimulation parameters are impacted by brain dynamics. Although research has advanced considerably over the past decade, there are still significant hurdles to optimizing use of this technique. For example, it remains unclear to what extent short timescale diagnostic biomarkers can predict long-term outcomes and to what extent these biomarkers add information to already existing biomarkers from passive electroencephalographic recordings. Further questions include the extent to which closed loop stimulation offers advantages over open loop stimulation, what the optimal closed loop timescales may be, and whether biomarker-informed stimulation can lead to seizure freedom. The ultimate goal of bioelectronic medicine remains not just to stop seizures but rather to cure epilepsy and its comorbidities.

Quantifying interictal intracranial EEG to predict focal epilepsy

Introduction

Intracranial EEG (IEEG) is used for 2 main purposes, to determine: (1) if epileptic networks are amenable to focal treatment and (2) where to intervene. Currently these questions are answered qualitatively and sometimes differently across centers. There is a need for objective, standardized methods to guide surgical decision making and to enable large scale data analysis across centers and prospective clinical trials.

Methods

We analyzed interictal data from 101 patients with drug resistant epilepsy who underwent presurgical evaluation with IEEG. We chose interictal data because of its potential to reduce the morbidity and cost associated with ictal recording. 65 patients had unifocal seizure onset on IEEG, and 36 were non-focal or multi-focal. We quantified the spatial dispersion of implanted electrodes and interictal IEEG abnormalities for each patient. We compared these measures against the "5 Sense Score (5SS)," a pre-implant estimate of the likelihood of focal seizure onset, and assessed their ability to predict the clinicians' choice of therapeutic intervention and the patient outcome.

Results

The spatial dispersion of IEEG electrodes predicted network focality with precision similar to the 5SS (AUC = 0.67), indicating that electrode placement accurately reflected pre-implant information. A cross-validated model combining the 5SS and the spatial dispersion of interictal IEEG abnormalities significantly improved this prediction (AUC = 0.79; p<0.05). The combined model predicted ultimate treatment strategy (surgery vs. device) with an AUC of 0.81 and post-surgical outcome at 2 years with an AUC of 0.70. The 5SS, interictal IEEG, and electrode placement were not correlated and provided complementary information.

Conclusions

Quantitative, interictal IEEG significantly improved upon pre-implant estimates of network focality and predicted treatment with precision approaching that of clinical experts. We present this study as an important step in building standardized, quantitative tools to guide epilepsy surgery.

Quantitative approaches to guide epilepsy surgery from intracranial EEG

Over the past 10 years, the drive to improve outcomes from epilepsy surgery has stimulated widespread interest in methods to quantitatively guide epilepsy surgery from intracranial EEG (iEEG). Many patients fail to achieve seizure freedom, in part due to the challenges in subjective iEEG interpretation. To address this clinical need, quantitative iEEG analytics have been developed using a variety of approaches, spanning studies of seizures, interictal periods, and their transitions, and encompass a range of techniques including electrographic signal analysis, dynamical systems modeling, machine learning and graph theory. Unfortunately, many methods fail to generalize to new data and are sensitive to differences in pathology and electrode placement. Here, we critically review selected literature on computational methods of identifying the epileptogenic zone from iEEG. We highlight shared methodological challenges common to many studies in this field and propose ways that they can be addressed. One fundamental common pitfall is a lack of open-source, high-quality data, which we specifically address by sharing a centralized high-quality, well-annotated, multicentre dataset consisting of >100 patients to support larger and more rigorous studies. Ultimately, we provide a road map to help these tools reach clinical trials and hope to improve the lives of future patients.