Short- and long-term mortality of subarachnoid hemorrhage according to hospital volume and severity using a nationwide multicenter registry study

Comparison of long-term clinical outcome after endovascular versus neurosurgical treatment of ruptured intracranial anterior circulation aneurysms: A single-centre experience

Introduction

In patients with anterior circulation aneurysmal Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (aSAH), endovascular coiling is currently practiced more frequently than neurosurgical clipping. However, despite multiple previous studies, it is still uncertain whether coiling is favourable in terms of long-term clinical outcome.

Research question

What is the effect of clipping versus coiling on long-term functional outcome of patients with an aSAH?

Material and methods

All anterior circulation aSAH patients (2012-2015) treated with clipping or coiling in two hospitals in the Netherlands were studied up to five years after treatment. Functional outcome, survival, retreatment- and complication rate were measured. Survival analysis was performed in both groups. A multivariable regression model with covariate adjustment was performed to investigate the likelihood of unfavourable outcome (modified Rankin Scale >2).

Results

Out of 204 patients, 75 patients were clipped (37%) and 129 received coiling (63%). Coiling had a higher retreatment rate compared to clipping (7.8% vs. 0.0%). Unfavourable outcome at six, 12, 24 and 60 months after treatment was higher for patients after clipping compared to coiling, but was not significant after correcting for clinical severity as represented by the WFNS grade. In 60 months, no difference in survival was found between clipping and coiling.

Discussion and conclusion

No differences between clipping and coiling in survival and long-term functional outcome have been found in this study. More research with prospective design and large cohorts is needed to identify possible differences between the two treatments.

High-Volume Centers Provide Superior Value of Care in the Surgical Treatment of Malignant Brain Tumor

BACKGROUND

Improved outcomes in surgical patients have been associated with increasing volume of cases. This has led to the development of centers that facilitate care for a specific patient population. This study aimed to evaluate associations of outcomes with hospital characteristics in patients undergoing resection of malignant brain tumors.

METHODS

The 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample was queried for patients undergoing resection of malignant brain tumors. Teaching hospitals with caseloads >2 standard deviations above the mean (140 cases) were categorized as high-volume centers (HVCs). Value of care was evaluated by adding one point for each of the following: short length of stay, low total charges, favorable discharge disposition, and lack of major comorbidity or complication.

RESULTS

In 3009 hospitals, 118,390 patients underwent resection of malignant brain tumors. HVC criteria were met by 91 (3%) hospitals. HVCs were more likely to treat patients of younger age or higher socioeconomic status (P < 0.01 for all). The Mid-Atlantic and South Atlantic regions had the highest percentage of cases and number of HVCs. Value of care was higher at HVCs (P < 0.01). Care at HVCs was associated with decreased complications (P < 0.01 for all) and improved patient outcomes (P < 0.01 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing craniotomy for malignant brain neoplasms have superior outcomes in HVCs. Trends of centralization may reflect the benefits of multidisciplinary treatment, geographic preferences, publicity, and cultural impact. Improvement of access to care is an important consideration as this trend continues.

Tanshinone IIA Alleviates Early Brain Injury after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Rats by Inhibiting the Activation of NF-κB/NLRP3 Inflammasome

The abnormal activation of the nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB)/nod-like receptor family-pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) signaling pathway is closely related to early brain injury after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). Targeting the NLRP3-inflammasome has been considered an efficient therapy for the local inflammatory response after SAH. Tanshinone IIA (Tan IIA), a major component extracted from Salvia miltiorrhiza, has been reported to have anti-inflammatory effects. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect and mechanism of Tan IIA on early brain injury after SAH. In vivo SAH injury was established by endovascular perforation technique in Sprague-Dawley rats. Limb-placement test and corner turning test were used to measure the behavior. Terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated deoxyuridine triphosphate nick-end labeling (TUNEL) staining, hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining, and immunofluorescence were used to evaluate the nerve damage. Real-time RT quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was used to quantify the levels of inflammatory factors. Western blot was performed for the activation of the NF-κB/NLRP3 pathway. An in vitro SAH model was used to validate the conclusion. We found that the neurobehavioral impairment and cerebral edema in SAH model rats given Tan IIA were alleviated. Further study demonstrated that Tan IIA could inhibit SAH-secondary neuronal apoptosis around hematoma and alleviate brain injury. Tan IIA down-regulated the expression of interleukin-6 (IL)-6, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, and inhibited the activation of NF-κB. And the overexpression of pro-inflammatory factors NLRP3, IL-1β, and IL-18 induced after SAH was also reversed by Tan IIA. In conclusions, Tan IIA could inhibit the NF-κB/NLRP3 inflammasome activation to protect and ameliorate SAH-followed early brain injury, and may be a preventive and therapeutic strategy against SAH.

Pharmacotherapy in SAH: Clinical Trial Lessons

Subarachnoid Haemorrhage (SAH) is a medical emergency with potentially devastating outcomes. It is without doubt that over the past decades, there has been a radical change in the approach towards patients with SAH, both in terms of the surgical as well as of the pharmacological treatments offered. The present review aims to outline the principal data regarding the best practice in the pharmacotherapy of SAH, as well as to sum up the emerging evidence from the latest clinical trials. To date, nimodipine is the only evidence-based treatment of vasospasm. However, extensive research is currently underway to identify novel substances with magnesium sulphate, cilostazol, clazosentan and fasudil, demonstrating promising results. Antifibrinolytic therapy could help reduce mortality, and anticoagulants, in spite of their associated hazards, could actually reduce the incidence of delayed cerebral ischemia. The effectiveness of triple-H therapy has been challenged, yet evidence on the optimal regimen is still pending. Statins may benefit some patients by reducing the incidence of vasospasm and delayed ischemic events. As several clinical trials are underway, it is expected that in the years to come, more therapeutic options will be added to the attending physician's armamentarium.

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Protocol for A Scoping Review

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a life-threatening condition associated with high mortality and substantial long-term morbidity. The SARS-CoV-2 virus is a new pathogen that causes a disease with variable clinical manifestations. Although the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with hypercoagulopathy, patients may also present with cerebral hemorrhage, including SAH. The present paper reports a protocol for a scoping review that is aimed to provide a comprehensive report on existing literature by examining data on SAH associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Our objective is to evaluate the epidemiology, clinical, laboratory, and neuroimaging features of SAH in patients with COVID-19 and to explore the etiology and possible interventions in this pathology. Using appropriate search terms, we will search LitCOVID, the WHO database on COVID-19, and MedRxiv. The inclusion criteria are pre-defined. We will extract the data of eligible studies in standardized forms and will report the results in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR). We will provide information for clinicians, healthcare providers, and public health specialists.