The sensitivity and specificity of the modified volume-viscosity swallow test for dysphagia screening among neurological patients

Nutritional Status, Dietary Intake, Quality of Life, and Dysphagia in Women With Fibromyalgia

BACKGROUND

Fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) is an idiopathic chronic disease characterized by widespread musculoskeletal pain, hyperalgesia, and allodynia that has been recently associated with risk of dysphagia.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to analyze the association between nutritional status, micro- and macronutrient intake, and quality of life (QoL) in a cohort of women with FMS and risk of dysphagia compared to women with FMS without risk of dysphagia.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted in 46 women with FMS. Risk of dysphagia was assessed by the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) and the Volume-Viscosity Swallow Test (V-VST). The Food Frequency Questionnaire and the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire were used to assess dietary intake and QoL, respectively.

RESULTS

Thirty women with FMS were at risk for dysphagia (65.21%), assessed by the EAT-10. Based on the V-VST, the frequency of risk of dysphagia was 63.04%. Significant differences in body mass index (BMI) were found between women at risk for dysphagia and those without risk. Women at risk for dysphagia had significantly lower overall QoL scores than those women without risk. No significant differences were found for dietary intake and dysphagia risk.

DISCUSSION

Women with FMS at risk for dysphagia have significantly lower BMI values and worse QoL than women without dysphagia risk, supporting the importance of assessing dysphagia in clinical practice in persons with FMS.

Orofacial Pain and Risk of Dysphagia in Women With Fibromyalgia: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to analyze the frequency of dysphagia risk and swallowing-associated quality of life (QoL) in a sample of women with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) and examine the potential relationship between risk of dysphagia and chronic orofacial pain (COP) in a sample of women with FMS.

METHOD

A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in 46 women with FMS. COP was assessed by mouth opening, the orofacial visual analog scale (VAS), and the craniofacial pain and disability inventory (CF-PDI). Risk of dysphagia was assessed using the Eating Assessment Tool (EAT-10) and the volume-viscosity swallowing test (V-VST). Swallowing-associated QoL was determined using the Swallowing Quality of Life (SWAL-QOL) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were identified as being at risk for dysphagia (65.21%) using the EAT-10 and, according to the SWAL-QOL, 41.30% of patients had alterations in QoL associated with swallowing. The EAT-10 correlated positively with orofacial VAS, CF-PDI-total, CF-PDI-pain and disability, and CF-PDI-jaw-functional status. In relation to SWAL-QOL, negative correlations were observed for orofacial VAS, CF-PDI-total, CF-PDI-pain and disability, and CF-PDI-jaw-functional status. Patients at risk of dysphagia (EAT-10 and V-VST) had significantly higher scores in orofacial VAS (p = .002 and p = .015), CF-PDI-total (p = .006 and p = .014), and CF-PDI-pain and disability (p = .004 and p = .013).

CONCLUSIONS

In this sample of women with FMS, we identified a high rate of dysphagia risk. Also, a high percentage of these women presented alterations in QoL associated with swallowing. Patients at risk for dysphagia had significantly higher orofacial VAS and CF-PDI-total scores, supporting the relationship between dysphagia risk and COP in FMS. Further research to establish the need for appropriate assessment referrals in clinical practice to determine whether dysphagia is present in this population is needed.

Dysphagia screening post-stroke: systematic review

BACKGROUND/SCOPE

Stroke is one of the main causes of death, especially when associated with dysphagia. Hence, the assessment of nutritional status and aspiration risk is important to improve clinical outcomes. The aim of this systematic review is to identify which are the most suitable dysphagia screening tools in chronic post-stroke patients.

METHODOLOGY

A systematic literature search was conducted for articles published from 1 January 2000 to 30 November 2022 in the Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science databases, including primary studies providing quantitative or qualitative data. Additionally, a manual search was conducted scanning the reference lists of relevant articles and Google Scholar was searched to retrieve additional records. The process of screening, selection and inclusion of the articles, as well as the assessment of risk of bias and methodological quality, were conducted by two reviewers.

RESULTS

Out of the 3672 records identified, we included 10 studies, mostly (n=9) cross-sectional, evaluating screening for dysphagia in 1653 chronic post-stroke patients. Volume-Viscosity Swallow Test was the only test applied in multiple studies with adequate sample size, demonstrating high diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity=96.6%-88.2%; specificity=83.3%-71.4%) compared with the videofluoroscopic swallowing study.

CONCLUSIONS

Dysphagia is an important complication in chronic post-stroke patients. Early identification of this condition through screening tools with adequate diagnostic accuracy is of paramount importance. The limited number of studies available and their small sample sizes may be a limitation to this study.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42022372303.

Clinical signs to predict the severity of dysphagia in Acute Ischemic Stroke patients

OBJECTIVES

In the current era, clinicians working in areas with limited and/or without facilities are only able to manage their patients based on clinical signs to detect dysphagia. This study assesses the performance of 5 simple clinical signs for predicting the severity of dysphagia.

METHODS

We systematically documented 5 targeted bedside clinical signs within 24 h after admission in 737 consecutive patients with acute stroke. We examined the median onset of each sign and calculated their ratios associated with severe dysphagia. The performance and significance of these special clinical signs were evaluated by further computation.

RESULTS

In total, 184 of 737 AIS patients were screened positive dysphagia by the modified V-VST. The 5 targeted bedside clinical signs were differed among the patients with and without dysphagia. Patients with serious dysphagia (n = 61,33.15%) showed higher positive percentages of larynx movement disorders than those classified as moderate (73.77% [60.99%-83.50%] vs 29.27% [21.82%-38.03%], p < 0.001). Logistic regression analyses conducted in the subsets confirmed larynx movement disorders as an independent predictor of dysphagia severity.

CONCLUSIONS

Larynx movement disorders is correlated with a higher probability of severe dysphagia as measured by the modified V-VST in AIS patients.