1
|
De Marco G, Simons J, Forsberg L, Douglas T. What makes a medical intervention invasive? JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS 2024; 50:226-233. [PMID: 37722810 DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-109301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
The classification of medical interventions as either invasive or non-invasive is commonly regarded to be morally important. On the most commonly endorsed account of invasiveness, a medical intervention is invasive if and only if it involves either breaking the skin ('incision') or inserting an object into the body ('insertion'). Building on recent discussions of the concept of invasiveness, we show that this standard account fails to capture three aspects of existing usage of the concept of invasiveness in relation to medical interventions-namely, (1) usage implying that invasiveness comes in degrees, (2) that the invasiveness of an intervention can depend on the characteristics of the salient alternative interventions, and (3) that medical interventions can be invasive in non-physical ways. We then offer the beginnings of a revised account that, we argue, is able to capture a wider range of existing usage. Central to our account is a distinction between two properties: basic invasiveness and threshold invasiveness We end by assessing what the standard account gets right, and what more needs to be done to complete our schematic account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel De Marco
- Faculty of Philosophy, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jannieke Simons
- Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Department of Bioethics and Health Humanities, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Lisa Forsberg
- Faculty of Philosophy, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Somerville College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Thomas Douglas
- Faculty of Philosophy, Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Jesus College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zarifkar AH, Zarifkar A, Safaei S. Different paradigms of transcranial electrical stimulation induce structural changes in the CA1 region of the hippocampus in a rat model of Alzheimer's disease. Neurosci Lett 2024; 818:137570. [PMID: 38000774 DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2023.137570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023]
Abstract
One of the prominent sign of Alzheimer's disease (AD) is structural changes in the hippocampus. Recently, the new methods used to treat this disease is transcranial electrical stimulation (tES). This study evaluated the effect of four primary standards of tES, including tDCS, tACS, tRNS, and tPCS on beta-amyloid 25-35 (Aβ25-35)-induced structural changes in the CA1 region of hippocampus in male rats. For this purpose, rats weighing 250-275 g were selected, the cannula was embedded reciprocally into the hippocampi. Aβ25-35 (5 μg/ 2.5 ml/ day) was infused reciprocally for four continuous days.Then, animals were then given tES for 6 days.Subsequently, structural changes in the hippocampal CA1 were evaluated using the stereological method. Aβ25-35 resulted in loss of neurons (P < 0.01) and decreased hippocampal volume (P < 0.05). However, the administration of tES paradigms prevented these changes. The results proposed that through the improvement of hippocampal cell number and volume, tES paradigms can retain efficiency in remediating structural impairments in AD. From this, it can be concluded that other tES paradigms besides tDCS can also be considered for the treatment of AD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Hossein Zarifkar
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran; Cellular and Molecular Biology Research Center, Larestan University of Medical Sciences, Larestan, Iran.
| | - Asadollah Zarifkar
- Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Sepideh Safaei
- Gerash Amir-al-Momenin Medical and Educational Center, Gerash University of Medical Sciences, Gerash, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Asher R, Hyun I, Head M, Cosgrove GR, Silbersweig D. Neuroethical implications of focused ultrasound for neuropsychiatric illness. Brain Stimul 2023; 16:806-814. [PMID: 37150289 DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2023.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND MR-guided focused ultrasound is a promising intervention for treatment-resistant mental illness, and merits contextualized ethical exploration in relation to more extensive ethical literature regarding other psychosurgical and neuromodulation treatment options for this patient population. To our knowledge, this topic has not yet been explored in the published literature. OBJECTIVE The purpose of this paper is to review and discuss in detail the neuroethical implications of MR-guided focused ultrasound for neuropsychiatric illness as an emerging treatment modality. METHODS Due to the lack of published literature on the topic, the approach involved a detailed survey and review of technical and medical literature relevant to focused ultrasound and established ethical issues related to alternative treatment options for patients with treatment-resistant, severe and persistent mental illness. The manuscript is structured according to thematic and topical findings. RESULTS This technology has potential benefits for patients suffering with severe mental illness, compared with established alternatives. The balance of technical, neuroscientific and clinical considerations should inform ethical deliberations. The nascent literature base, nuances in legal classification and permissibility depending upon jurisdiction, influences of past ethical issues associated with alternative treatments, tone and framing in media articles, and complexity of clinical trials all influence ethical assessment and evaluations of multiple stakeholders. Recommendations for future research are provided based on these factors. CONCLUSION Salient ethical inquiry should be further explored by researchers, clinicians, and ethicists in a nuanced manner methodologically, one which is informed by past and present ethical issues related to alternative treatment options, broader psychiatric treatment frameworks, pragmatic implementation challenges, intercultural considerations, and patients' ethical concerns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Asher
- Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Insoo Hyun
- Center for Bioethics at Harvard Medical School, 641 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - Mitchell Head
- Te Kotahi Research Institute/University of Waikato, Gate 4C, 194H Hillcrest Rd, Hillcrest, Hamilton, 3216, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
| | - G Rees Cosgrove
- Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| | - David Silbersweig
- Brigham and Women's Hospital/Harvard Medical School, 60 Fenwood Rd, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Borbón D, Borbón L. A Critical Perspective on NeuroRights: Comments Regarding Ethics and Law. Front Hum Neurosci 2021; 15:703121. [PMID: 34759805 PMCID: PMC8573066 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.703121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 09/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Diego Borbón
- The Latin American Observatory of Human Rights and Enterprises, NeuroRights Research Line, Universidad Externado de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Luisa Borbón
- Faculty of Engineering, University of Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bluhm R, Castillo E, Achtyes ED, McCright AM, Cabrera LY. They Affect the Person, but for Better or Worse? Perceptions of Electroceutical Interventions for Depression Among Psychiatrists, Patients, and the Public. QUALITATIVE HEALTH RESEARCH 2021; 31:2542-2553. [PMID: 34672815 PMCID: PMC8579329 DOI: 10.1177/10497323211037642] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Responding to reports of cases of personality change following deep brain stimulation, neuroethicists have debated the nature and ethical implications of these changes. Recently, this literature has been challenged as being overblown and therefore potentially an impediment to patients accessing needed treatment. We interviewed 16 psychiatrists, 16 patients with depression, and 16 members of the public without depression, all from the Midwestern United States, about their views on how three electroceutical interventions (deep brain stimulation, electroconvulsive therapy, and transcranial magnetic stimulation) used to treat depression might affect the self. Participants were also asked to compare the electroceuticals' effects on the self with the effects of commonly used depression treatments (psychotherapy and pharmaceuticals). Using qualitative content analysis, we found that participants' views on electroceuticals' potential effects on the self mainly focused on treatment effectiveness and side effects. Our results have implications for both theoretical discussions in neuroethics and clinical practice in psychiatry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robyn Bluhm
- Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Santens P, Vanschoenbeek G, Miatton M, De Letter M. The moral brain and moral behaviour in patients with Parkinson's disease: a review of the literature. Acta Neurol Belg 2018; 118:387-393. [PMID: 30014443 DOI: 10.1007/s13760-018-0986-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Morality is a complex and versatile concept that necessitates the integrated activity of multiple interacting networks in the brain. Numerous cortical and subcortical areas, many of which are implicated in either emotional and cognitive control or Theory of Mind, are involved in the processing of moral behaviour. Different methods have been used to investigate various aspects of morality, which has lead to confusing and sometimes opposing results. Emotional, cognitive and personality changes have long been recognized in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients, suggesting a potential impact on moral aspects of behaviour in daily living situations. Alterations in social cognition have been described in all stages of PD but these are rather directly related to PD pathology and not to dopaminergic or DBS treatment. There are no convincing data supporting the hypothesis that dopaminergic treatment or deep brain stimulation of the STN per se interfere with morality in PD patients, although subgroups of patients may display socially unacceptable behaviour. Research in social cognition in PD patients is a fascinating topic that needs further attention in view of the impact on quality of life for PD patients and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Santens
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 13K12, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Giel Vanschoenbeek
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 13K12, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Marijke Miatton
- Department of Neurology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 13K12, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Miet De Letter
- Department of Speech, Language and Hearing Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 2P1, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Yaden DB, Eichstaedt JC, Medaglia JD. The Future of Technology in Positive Psychology: Methodological Advances in the Science of Well-Being. Front Psychol 2018; 9:962. [PMID: 29967586 PMCID: PMC6016018 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00962] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in biotechnology and information technology are poised to transform well-being research. This article reviews the technologies that we predict will have the most impact on both measurement and intervention in the field of positive psychology over the next decade. These technologies include: psychopharmacology, non-invasive brain stimulation, virtual reality environments, and big-data methods for large-scale multivariate analysis. Some particularly relevant potential costs and benefits to individual and collective well-being are considered for each technology as well as ethical considerations. As these technologies may substantially enhance the capacity of psychologists to intervene on and measure well-being, now is the time to discuss the potential promise and pitfalls of these technologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B. Yaden
- Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | | | - John D. Medaglia
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- Department of Psychology, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Semprini M, Laffranchi M, Sanguineti V, Avanzino L, De Icco R, De Michieli L, Chiappalone M. Technological Approaches for Neurorehabilitation: From Robotic Devices to Brain Stimulation and Beyond. Front Neurol 2018; 9:212. [PMID: 29686644 PMCID: PMC5900382 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2018.00212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2017] [Accepted: 03/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Neurological diseases causing motor/cognitive impairments are among the most common causes of adult-onset disability. More than one billion of people are affected worldwide, and this number is expected to increase in upcoming years, because of the rapidly aging population. The frequent lack of complete recovery makes it desirable to develop novel neurorehabilitative treatments, suited to the patients, and better targeting the specific disability. To date, rehabilitation therapy can be aided by the technological support of robotic-based therapy, non-invasive brain stimulation, and neural interfaces. In this perspective, we will review the above methods by referring to the most recent advances in each field. Then, we propose and discuss current and future approaches based on the combination of the above. As pointed out in the recent literature, by combining traditional rehabilitation techniques with neuromodulation, biofeedback recordings and/or novel robotic and wearable assistive devices, several studies have proven it is possible to sensibly improve the amount of recovery with respect to traditional treatments. We will then discuss the possible applied research directions to maximize the outcome of a neurorehabilitation therapy, which should include the personalization of the therapy based on patient and clinician needs and preferences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Vittorio Sanguineti
- Department of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics and Systems Engineering (DIBRIS), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Laura Avanzino
- Section of Human Physiology, Department of Experimental Medicine (DIMES), University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Roberto De Icco
- Department of Neurology and Neurorehabilitation, Istituto Neurologico Nazionale C. Mondino, Pavia, Italy.,Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | | | | |
Collapse
|