Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Comparative efficacy of non-invasive brain stimulation on cognition function in patients with mild cognitive impairment: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a critical time window for implementing prevention strategies to attenuate or delay cognitive decline. Non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques are promising non-pharmacological therapies for improving the cognitive function of MCI, but it is unclear which type of NIBS protocol is most effective. This study aimed to compare and rank the beneficial effect of different NIBS methods/protocols on cognitive function and examine the acceptability of NIBS in patients with MCI.

METHODS

Electronic search of PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and Chongqing VIP Database up to November 2023. Patients with diagnosis of MCI were included. The primary outcomes were acceptability and pre-post treatment changes in global cognitive function, and the secondary outcomes were specific cognitive domains (language and executive function). All network meta‑analysis procedures were performed under the frequentist model. A protocol for this systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42023441448).

RESULTS

A network meta-analysis was conducted on 19 eligible RCTs consisting of 599 subjects. Compared with the sham stimulation, Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over the Bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rTMS-F3F4) showed the strongest improvement in global cognitive function in MCI patients (SMD =1.52[95 %CIs =0.49-2.56]), followed by rTMS over the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (rTMS-F3) (SMD =1.25[95 %CIs =0.57-1.93]); Moreover, rTMS-F3F4 showed more significant efficacy in language function (SMD =0.96[95 %CIs = 0.20-1.72]); No statistically significant differences were found among the other cognitive domains. Compared with the rTMS-F4, rTMS-F3F4 showed a stronger improvement in global cognitive function in MCI patients (SMD =1.80[95 %CIs =0.02-3.59]). Similar results were obtained in subgroup analyses of cognitive function. All the methods were well-tolerated with an acceptable safety profile.

CONCLUSION

The present findings provide evidence of the benefits of NIBS, especially TMS stimulating the bilateral dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, for the beneficial effect on cognitive and language function in patients with MCI. However, because few studies were available for inclusion, additional well-designed, large-scale RCTs are warranted to support exploring longer-term dynamic effects.

The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic and transcranial direct current stimulation on memory functions in older adults with mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a condition that impairs activities of daily living, and often transforms to dementia. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) show promise in improving cognitive functions in MCI patients. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to compare the effects of rTMS and tDCS on memory functions in MCI patients. We explored eight databases from their inception to March 16, 2024. We obtained 11 studies with 406 patients with MCI. We used the standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) to synthesize the effect size. rTMS and tDCS significantly improved memory functions in MCI patients (SMD = 0.61; 95% CI: 0.41-0.82; p < 0.00001; I2 = 22%). In subgroup analysis of number of stimulation sessions, both rTMS and tDCS over 10 sessions (SMD = 0.84; 95% CI: 0.50-1.17, p < 0.00001, I2 = 0%) significantly improved the memory function in MCI patients. The subgroup analyses on different stimulation types (SMD = 0.78; 95% CI: 0.51-1.06; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%) and treatment persistent effects (SMD = 0.93; 95% CI: 0.51-1.35, p < 0.0001, I2 = 0%) showed that rTMS was more effective than tDCS. rTMS with a stimulation frequency of 10 Hz (SMD = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.51-1.21; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%) and over 10 sessions (SMD = 0.98; 95% CI: 0.58-1.38; p < 0.00001; I2 = 0%) at multiple sites (SMD = 0.97; 95% CI: 0.44-1.49; p = 0.0003; I2 = 0%) showed a great improvement in the memory performance of patients with MCI. rTMS was more likely to appear temporary side effects (risk ratio (RR) = 3.18, 95% CI: 1.29-7.83, p = 0.01). This meta-analysis suggests that rTMS and tDCS are safe and efficient tools to improve memory functions in patients with MCI, while rTMS had a larger effect than tDCS. rTMS with a stimulation frequency of 10 Hz targeted on multiple sites over 10 sessions showed the greatest effect. We could not conclude parameters of tDCS because of insufficient data.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42024558991.

Clinical efficacy of deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) in psychiatric and cognitive disorders: A systematic review

Deep transcranial magnetic stimulation (dTMS) has gained attention as an enhanced form of traditional TMS, targeting broader and deeper regions of the brain. However, a fulsome synthesis of dTMS efficacy across psychiatric and cognitive disorders using sham-controlled trials is lacking. We systematically reviewed 28 clinical trials comparing active dTMS to a sham/controlled condition to characterize dTMS efficacy across diverse psychiatric and cognitive disorders. A comprehensive search of APA PsycINFO, Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and PubMed databases was conducted. Predominant evidence supports dTMS efficacy in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD; n = 2), substance use disorders (SUDs; n = 8), and in those experiencing depressive episodes with major depressive disorder (MDD) or bipolar disorder (BD; n = 6). However, the clinical efficacy of dTMS in psychiatric disorders characterized by hyperactivity or hyperarousal (i.e., attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, and schizophrenia) was heterogeneous. Common side effects included headaches and pain/discomfort, with rare but serious adverse events such as seizures and suicidal ideation/attempts. Risk of bias ratings indicated a collectively low risk according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations checklist (Meader et al., 2014). Literature suggests promise for dTMS as a beneficial alternative or add-on treatment for patients who do not respond well to traditional treatment, particularly for depressive episodes, OCD, and SUDs. Mixed evidence and limited clinical trials for other psychiatric and cognitive disorders suggest more extensive research is warranted. Future research should examine the durability of dTMS interventions and identify moderators of clinical efficacy.

A phase I trial of accelerated intermittent theta burst rTMS for amnestic MCI

BACKGROUND

Emerging evidence suggests that repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) enhances cognition in mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Accelerated intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) rTMS protocols are promising as they substantially reduce burden by shortening the treatment course, but the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of iTBS have not been established in MCI.

METHODS

24 older adults with amnestic MCI (aMCI) due to possible Alzheimer's disease enrolled in a phase I trial of open-label accelerated iTBS to the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (8 stimulation sessions of 600 pulses of iTBS/day for 3 days). Participants rated common side effects during and after each session and retrospectively (at post-treatment and 4-week follow-up). They completed brain MRI (for safety assessments and electric field modeling), neuropsychiatric evaluations, and neuropsychological testing before and after treatment; a subset of measures was administered at follow-up.

RESULTS

Retention was high (95%) and there were no adverse neuroradiological, neuropsychiatric, or neurocognitive effects of treatment. Participants reported high acceptability, minimal side effects, and low desire to quit despite some rating the treatment as tiring. Electric field modeling data suggest that all participants received safe and therapeutic cortical stimulation intensities. We observed a significant, large effect size (d=0.98) improvement in fluid cognition using the NIH Toolbox Cognition Battery from pre-treatment to post-treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the safety, feasibility, and acceptability of accelerated iTBS in aMCI. In addition, we provide evidence of target engagement in the form of improved cognition following treatment. These promising results directly inform future trials aimed at optimizing treatment parameters.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT04503096.

Unlocking the Potential of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Alzheimer's Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials to Optimize Intervention Strategies

Background

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an advanced and noninvasive technology that uses pulse stimulation to treat cognitive impairment. However, its specific effects have always been mixed with those of cognitive training, and the optimal parameter for Alzheimer's disease (AD) intervention is still ambiguous.

Objective

This study aimed to summarize the therapeutic effects of pure rTMS on AD, excluding the influence of cognitive training, and to develop a preliminary rTMS treatment plan.

Methods

Between 1 January 2010 and 28 February 2023, we screened randomized controlled clinical trials from five databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials. gov). We conducted a meta-analysis and systematic review of treatment outcomes and rTMS treatment parameters.

Result

A total of 4,606 articles were retrieved. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 16 articles, comprising 655 participants (308 males and 337 females), were included in the final analysis. The findings revealed that rTMS significantly enhances both global cognitive ability (p = 0.0002, SMD = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.20-0.66) and memory (p = 0.009, SMD = 0.37, 95% CI = 0.09-0.65). Based on follow-up periods of at least 6 weeks, the following stimulation protocols have demonstrated efficacy for AD: stimulation sites (single or multiple targets), frequency (20 Hz), stimulation time (1-2 s), interval (20-30 s), single pulses (≤2500), total pulses (>20000), duration (≥3 weeks), and sessions (≥20).

Conclusions

This study suggests that rTMS may be an effective treatment option for patients with AD, and its potential therapeutic capabilities should be further developed in the future.

rTMS reduces delta and increases theta oscillations in Alzheimer's disease: A visual-evoked and event-related potentials study

BACKGROUND

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has emerged as a promising alternative therapy for Alzheimer's disease (AD) due to its ability to modulate neural networks and enhance cognitive function. This treatment offers the unique advantage of enabling real-time monitoring of immediate cognitive effects and dynamic brain changes through electroencephalography (EEG).

OBJECTIVE

This study focused on exploring the effects of left parietal rTMS stimulation on visual-evoked potentials (VEP) and visual event-related potentials (VERP) in AD patients.

METHODS

Sixteen AD patients were recruited for this longitudinal study. EEG data were collected within a Faraday cage both pre- and post-rTMS to evaluate its impact on potentials.

RESULTS

Significant alterations were found in both VEP and VERP oscillations. Specifically, delta power in VEP decreased, while theta power in VERP increased post-rTMS, indicating a modulation of brain activities.

DISCUSSION

These findings confirm the positive modulatory impact of rTMS on brain activities in AD, evidenced by improved cognitive scores. They align with previous studies highlighting the potential of rTMS in managing hyperexcitability and oscillatory disturbances in the AD cortex.

CONCLUSION

Cognitive improvements post-rTMS endorse its potential as a promising neuromodulatory treatment for cognitive enhancement in AD, thereby providing critical insights into the neurophysiological anomalies in AD and possible therapeutic avenues.

Pre-treatment frontal beta events are associated with executive dysfunction improvement after repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for depression: A preliminary report

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an established clinical treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD) that has also been found to improve aspects of executive functioning. The objective of this study was to examine whether oscillatory burst-like events within the beta band (15-29 Hz) prior to treatment could predict subsequent change in self-reported executive dysfunction (EDF) across a clinical course of rTMS for MDD. Twenty-eight adults (64% female) with MDD completed the self-report Frontal Systems Behavior Scale (FrSBe) and provided eyes-closed resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) before and after a clinical course of rTMS therapy for primary MDD. The rate, power, duration, and frequency span of transient EEG measured oscillatory beta events were calculated. Events within delta/theta and alpha bands were examined to assess for beta specificity. After controlling for improvement in primary depressive symptoms, a lower rate of beta events at F3, Fz, F4, and Cz prior to rTMS treatment was associated with a larger improvement in EDF after rTMS treatment. In addition, a decrease in beta event rate at Fz pre-to-post treatment was associated with a larger improvement in EDF after treatment. Results were largely specific to the beta band. In this study, the rate of frontrocentral beta events prior to treatment significantly predicted the likelihood of subsequent improvement in EDF symptoms following a clinical course of rTMS for MDD. These preliminary findings suggest the potential utility of EEG measured beta events and rTMS for targeting EDF across an array of neuropsychiatric disorders.

After-effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with parameter dependence on long-term potentiation-like plasticity and object recognition memory in rats

Objective

To investigate the after-effects of 25-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) at 60, 100, and 120% resting motor threshold (rMT) on long-term potentiation (LTP) in the rat hippocampus, to clarify the intensity dependence of rTMS, and to determine whether it simultaneously affects learning and memory ability.

Methods

Five rats were randomly selected from 70 male Wistar rats, and evoked rMT potentials were recorded in response to magnetic stimulation. The remaining 65 rats were randomly assigned to five groups (n = 13), including sham rTMS, 1 Hz 100% rMT, and 25 Hz rTMS groups with 3 subgroups of 60% rMT, 100% rMT, and 120% rMT. Five rats in each group were anesthetized and induced by a priming TMS-test design for population spike (PS) response of the perforant path-dentate gyrus in the hippocampus; the remaining eight rats in each group were evaluated for object recognition memory in the novel object recognition (NOR) task after the different rTMS protocols.

Results

Forty-five percent (approximately 1.03 T) of the magnetic stimulator output was confirmed as rMT in the biceps femoris muscle. The PS ratio was ranked as follows: 25 Hz 100% rMT (267.78 ± 25.71%) > sham rTMS (182 ± 9.4%) >1 Hz 100% rMT (102.69 ± 6.64%) > 25 Hz 120% rMT (98 ± 11.3%) > 25 Hz 60% rMT (36 ± 8.5%). Significant differences were observed between the groups, except for the difference between the 25 Hz 120% rMT and the 1 Hz 100% rMT groups (p = 0.446). LTP was successfully induced over the 60-min recording period only in the sham rTMS and 25 Hz 100% rMT groups. Moreover, these two groups spent more time exploring a novel object than a familiar object during the NOR task (p < 0.001), suggesting long-term recognition memory retention. In the between-group analysis of the discrimination index, the following ranking was observed: 25 Hz 100% rMT (0.812 ± 0.158) > sham rTMS (0.653 ± 0.111) > 25 Hz 120% rMT (0.583 ± 0.216) >1 Hz 100% rMT (0.581 ± 0.145) > 25 Hz 60% rMT (0.532 ± 0.220).

Conclusion

The after-effect of 25-Hz rTMS was dependent on stimulus intensity and provided an inverted (V-shaped) bidirectional modulation on hippocampal plasticity that involved two forms of metaplasticity. Furthermore, the effects on the recognition memory ability were positively correlated with those on LTP induction in the hippocampus in vivo.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Cognitive Effects of rTMS in Caucasian Patients with Mild Cognitive Impairment

In recent years, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has received much attention as a non-invasive, effective treatment modality for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Although several meta-analyses have reported that rTMS can improve cognitive abilities, improvements in individual memory domains (speech, language, concentration, and memory) are poorly understood. In addition, stimulation parameters may be flawed in studies of global populations because of ethnic differences between Caucasians and Asians. This meta-analysis aimed to systematically characterize the efficacy of different combinations of rTMS parameters on different cognitive domains in Caucasian patients with MCI. We conducted a systematic literature search in Medline PubMed, Pubpsych, and Embase on the use of rTMS in MCI patients through November 2022. Randomized, double-blind, and sham-controlled trials (RCTs) from the Caucasian patient population were included. The studies reported outcome measures for different domains of cognition, such as language, concentration, or memory. Possible effects of covariates were examined using meta-regressions. The search yielded five publications. The analyses found that rTMS improved cognitive functions, memory, concentration, and language in patients with MCI and treatment with rTMS compared with the sham stimulation group. The statistical analysis results of the studies showed that rTMS could improve various cognitive functions, such as memory and concentration, in Caucasian MCI patients. A particular effect was found at a frequency of 10 Hz and stimulation of the LDLPFC. However, further studies are needed to validate these findings and explore more effective stimulation protocols and targets.

Does repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improve cognitive function in age-related neurodegenerative diseases? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

High-frequency, repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) targeted over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) is widely used in research to promote neuroplasticity and cognitive enhancement. RTMS is a promising intervention to tackle cognitive decline in people with age-related neurodegenerative diseases. However, there is currently no systematic evidence examining the effects of DLPFC-targeted, high-frequency rTMS on cognitive function in this population. The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy and moderators of this treatment intervention.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search of five electronic databases was performed to identify articles published before October, 2022. Following PRISMA guidelines, the identified articles were screened, data was extracted, and the methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane tool, Risk of Bias 2. Meta-analyses were performed using R Studio (v.4.1.2).

RESULTS

Sixteen studies involving 474 participants met the inclusion criteria, of which 8 studies measured global cognitive function. The results from the random-effects meta-analysis showed rTMS significantly improved global cognitive function relative to control groups shown by a large, significant effect size (g = 1.39, 95% CI, 0.34-2.43; p = 0.017). No significant effects were found between subgroups or for individual cognitive domains.

CONCLUSIONS

High-frequency rTMS, targeted over the DLPFC, appears to improve global cognitive function in people with age-related neurodegenerative diseases. However, these results should be interpreted with caution due to the small number of studies included, and high between-study heterogeneity.

Transcranial magnetic stimulation effects on cognitive enhancement in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a non-invasive intervention that holds promise for improving cognitive function in individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, the effectiveness of this therapy and the optimal TMS parameters has not reached a consensus. The purpose of the meta-analysis was to systematically discern the effectiveness of different components of TMS protocols on cognitive improvement in patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and AD.

Methods

The meta-analysis was preregistered on Prospero (registration number: CRD42022345482). PubMed, Web of Science, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library databases were used to search, screen and identify eligible studies with the following keywords: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation OR TMS OR theta burst stimulation AND Alzheimer OR Alzheimers OR Alzheimer's OR mild cognitive impairment OR MCI. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of participants with accepted standardized diagnostic criteria were searched by two authors independently. The risk of bias was assessed using an adapted Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated using the random-effects models. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate the influential factors.

Results

A total of 21 studies and 25 trials were included in this meta-analysis. The findings revealed a significant overall cognition improvement of real stimulation compared with sham stimulation (short-term effects: SMD, 0.91; 95% CI 0.44-1.38; P < 0.01; long-lasting effects: SMD, 0.91; 95% CI 0.27-1.55; P < 0.01). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and bilateral cerebellums, as well as moderate frequency stimulation (5 Hz and 10 Hz) on mild and moderate cognitive impairment patients, were more effective than other TMS protocols. However, the additional application of cognitive training showed no significant improvement.

Conclusion

Cognitive improvement effect of TMS was demonstrated in MCI and AD patients in both short-term assessment and long-lasting outcomes, and the efficiency of TMS is affected by the stimulation frequency, stimulation site, and participant characteristics. Further RCTs are needed to validate the findings of our subgroup analysis.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42022345482, identifier: CRD42022345482.

Cerebral blood flow changes induced by high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with cognitive training in Alzheimer's disease

Background and purpose

Hypoperfusion of the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) and precuneus has consistently been reported in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) combined with cognitive training (COG) is effective in alleviating the symptoms of patients with mild AD. This study investigated the effects of rTMS-COG therapy on cerebral blood flow (CBF), with a special interest in the PCC/precuneus, and whether observed CBF changes are associated with changes in neuropsychological assessments in AD.

Materials and methods

Twenty-one patients with mild or moderate AD were randomly divided into real rTMS (n = 11) and sham treatment (n = 10) groups, both combined with COG. Neuro-navigated 10 Hz rTMS was used to stimulate the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and then the left lateral temporal lobe (LTL) for 20 min each day for 4 weeks in the real rTMS group. All patients with AD underwent neuropsychological assessment, pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling, and structural 3D T1-weighted MRI before treatment (T0), immediately after treatment (T1), and 4 weeks after treatment (T2). CBF in the precuneus, PCC, and stimulation targets at the region-of-interest (ROI) level, as well as whole-brain CBF changes at the voxel level, were compared between the two groups at three timepoints.

Results

rTMS-COG therapy revealed significant group × time interactions for the Mini-Mental State Examination (F = 5.339, p = 0.023, η² = 0.433) and activities of daily living (F = 5.409, p = 0.039, η² = 0.436) scores. The regional CBF in the precuneus showed a significant group × time interaction (F = 5.833, p = 0.027, η² = 0.593). For voxel-level analysis, a significant group main effect was found in the left limbic lobe cluster, with the maximal peak in the left parahippocampus (p < 0.001, uncorrected, peak at [-16 -8 -24]). Simple effects analysis indicated that rTMS-COG therapy induced a decrease in CBF in the precuneus at T1 (p = 0.007) and an increase in the left parahippocampus at T2 (p=0.008). CBF decrease in the precuneus was correlated with better cognitive function immediately after treatment (T1) (r =-0.732, p=0.025).

Conclusion

Neuropsychological assessments showed immediate and long-term effects on cognitive function and activities of daily living after rTMS-COG therapy. CBF changes induced by high-frequency rTMS-COG therapy are region-dependent, showing immediate effects in the precuneus and long-term effects in the left parahippocampus. These results provide imaging evidence to understand the underlying neurobiological mechanism for the application of rTMS-COG in AD.

Dual-targeted repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation modulates brain functional network connectivity to improve cognition in mild cognitive impairment patients

Background: Mild cognitive impairment (MCI) is a condition between normal aging and dementia; nearly 10-15% of MCI patients develop dementia annually. There are no effective interventions for MCI progression. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that has attempted to improve the overall cognitive function of MCI patients. However, it does not affect episodic memory improvement. Methods: In this study, we engaged 15 clinically diagnosed MCI patients and normal controls to explore the effect of dual-targeted rTMS on progressing cognitive function, particularly episodic memory in MCI patients. Resting-state EEG recordings and neuropsychological assessments were conducted before and after the intervention. EEG features were extracted using an adaptive algorithm to calculate functional connectivity alterations in relevant brain regions and the mechanisms of altered brain functional networks in response to dual-target rTMS. Results: The study revealed that the functional brain connectivity between the right posterior cingulate gyrus (PCC) and the right dorsal caudate nucleus (DC) was significantly reduced in MCI patients compared to normal controls (p < 0.001). Dual-target rTMS increased the strength of the reduced functional connectivity (p < 0.001), which was related to cognitive enhancement (p < 0.05). Conclusion: This study provides a new stimulation protocol for rTMS intervention. Improving the functional connectivity of the right PCC to the right DC is a possible mechanism by which rTMS improves overall cognitive and memory function in MCI patients.