From descriptive connectome to mechanistic connectome: Generative modeling in functional magnetic resonance imaging analysis

Recent Progress in Brain Network Models for Medical Applications: A Review

Importance: Pathological perturbations of the brain often spread via connectome to fundamentally alter functional consequences. By integrating multimodal neuroimaging data with mathematical neural mass modeling, brain network models (BNMs) enable to quantitatively characterize aberrant network dynamics underlying multiple neurological and psychiatric disorders. We delved into the advancements of BNM-based medical applications, discussed the prevalent challenges within this field, and provided possible solutions and future directions. Highlights: This paper reviewed the theoretical foundations and current medical applications of computational BNMs. Composed of neural mass models, the BNM framework allows to investigate large-scale brain dynamics behind brain diseases by linking the simulated functional signals to the empirical neurophysiological data, and has shown promise in exploring neuropathological mechanisms, elucidating therapeutic effects, and predicting disease outcome. Despite that several limitations existed, one promising trend of this research field is to precisely guide clinical neuromodulation treatment based on individual BNM simulation. Conclusion: BNM carries the potential to help understand the mechanism underlying how neuropathology affects brain network dynamics, further contributing to decision-making in clinical diagnosis and treatment. Several constraints must be addressed and surmounted to pave the way for its utilization in the clinic.

Macroscale coupling between structural and effective connectivity in the mouse brain

Exploring how the emergent functional connectivity (FC) relates to the underlying anatomy (structural connectivity, SC) is one of the major goals of modern neuroscience. At the macroscale level, no one-to-one correspondence between structural and functional links seems to exist. And we posit that to better understand their coupling, two key aspects should be considered: the directionality of the structural connectome and limitations in explaining networks functions through an undirected measure such as FC. Here, we employed an accurate directed SC of the mouse brain acquired through viral tracers and compared it with single-subject effective connectivity (EC) matrices derived from a dynamic causal model (DCM) applied to whole-brain resting-state fMRI data. We analyzed how SC deviates from EC and quantified their respective couplings by conditioning on the strongest SC links and EC links. We found that when conditioning on the strongest EC links, the obtained coupling follows the unimodal-transmodal functional hierarchy. Whereas the reverse is not true, as there are strong SC links within high-order cortical areas with no corresponding strong EC links. This mismatch is even more clear across networks; only within sensory motor networks did we observe connections that align in terms of both effective and structural strength.

Causation in neuroscience: keeping mechanism meaningful

A fundamental goal of research in neuroscience is to uncover the causal structure of the brain. This focus on causation makes sense, because causal information can provide explanations of brain function and identify reliable targets with which to understand cognitive function and prevent or change neurological conditions and psychiatric disorders. In this research, one of the most frequently used causal concepts is 'mechanism' - this is seen in the literature and language of the field, in grant and funding inquiries that specify what research is supported, and in journal guidelines on which contributions are considered for publication. In these contexts, mechanisms are commonly tied to expressions of the main aims of the field and cited as the 'fundamental', 'foundational' and/or 'basic' unit for understanding the brain. Despite its common usage and perceived importance, mechanism is used in different ways that are rarely distinguished. Given that this concept is defined in different ways throughout the field - and that there is often no clarification of which definition is intended - there remains a marked ambiguity about the fundamental goals, orientation and principles of the field. Here we provide an overview of causation and mechanism from the perspectives of neuroscience and philosophy of science, in order to address these challenges.