1
|
Linne ML. Computational modeling of neuron-glia signaling interactions to unravel cellular and neural circuit functioning. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2024; 85:102838. [PMID: 38310660 DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2023.102838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2024]
Abstract
Glial cells have been shown to be vital for various brain functions, including homeostasis, information processing, and cognition. Over the past 30 years, various signaling interactions between neuronal and glial cells have been shown to underlie these functions. This review summarizes the interactions, particularly between neurons and astrocytes, which are types of glial cells. Some of the interactions remain controversial in part due to the nature of experimental methods and preparations used. Based on the accumulated data, computational models of the neuron-astrocyte interactions have been developed to explain the complex functions of astrocytes in neural circuits and to test conflicting hypotheses. This review presents the most significant recent models, modeling methods and simulation tools for neuron-astrocyte interactions. In the future, we will especially need more experimental research on awake animals in vivo and new computational models of neuron-glia interactions to advance our understanding of cellular dynamics and the functioning of neural circuits in different brain regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marja-Leena Linne
- Tampere University, Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Aldibani HKA, Rajput AJ, Rostami-Hodjegan A. In-depth analysis of patterns in selection of different physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling tools: Part II - Assessment of model reusability and comparison between open and non-open source-code software. Biopharm Drug Dispos 2023; 44:292-300. [PMID: 37083940 DOI: 10.1002/bdd.2360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2022] [Revised: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/04/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2023]
Abstract
Whilst the reproducibility of models in the area of systems biology and quantitative systems pharmacology has been the focus of attention lately, the concept of 'reusability' is not addressed. With the advent of the 'Model Master File' dominating some regulatory discussions on pharmaceutical applications of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models, reusability becomes a vital aspect of confidence in their use. Herein, we define 'reusability' specifically in the context of PBPK models and investigate the influence of open versus non-open source-code (NOSC) nature of the software on the extent of 'reusability'. Original articles (n = 145) that were associated with the development of novel PBPK models were identified as source models and citations to these reports, which involved further PBPK model development, were explored (n > 1800) for reuse cases of the source PBPK model whether in full or partial form. The nature of source-code was a major determinant of external reusability for PBPK models (>50% of the NOSC models as opposed <25% of open source-code [OSC]). Full reusability of the models was not common and mostly involved internal reuse of the OSC model (by the group who had previously developed the original model). The results were stratified by the software utilised (various), organisations involved (academia, industry, regulatory), and type of reusability (full vs. partial). The clear link between external reuse of models and NOSC PBPK software might stem from many elements related to quality and trust that require further investigation, and challenges the unfounded notion that OSC models are associated with higher uptake for reuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arham Jamaal Rajput
- Centre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Amin Rostami-Hodjegan
- Centre for Applied Pharmacokinetic Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Certara UK Limited, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Manninen T, Aćimović J, Linne ML. Analysis of Network Models with Neuron-Astrocyte Interactions. Neuroinformatics 2023; 21:375-406. [PMID: 36959372 PMCID: PMC10085960 DOI: 10.1007/s12021-023-09622-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 03/25/2023]
Abstract
Neural networks, composed of many neurons and governed by complex interactions between them, are a widely accepted formalism for modeling and exploring global dynamics and emergent properties in brain systems. In the past decades, experimental evidence of computationally relevant neuron-astrocyte interactions, as well as the astrocytic modulation of global neural dynamics, have accumulated. These findings motivated advances in computational glioscience and inspired several models integrating mechanisms of neuron-astrocyte interactions into the standard neural network formalism. These models were developed to study, for example, synchronization, information transfer, synaptic plasticity, and hyperexcitability, as well as classification tasks and hardware implementations. We here focus on network models of at least two neurons interacting bidirectionally with at least two astrocytes that include explicitly modeled astrocytic calcium dynamics. In this study, we analyze the evolution of these models and the biophysical, biochemical, cellular, and network mechanisms used to construct them. Based on our analysis, we propose how to systematically describe and categorize interaction schemes between cells in neuron-astrocyte networks. We additionally study the models in view of the existing experimental data and present future perspectives. Our analysis is an important first step towards understanding astrocytic contribution to brain functions. However, more advances are needed to collect comprehensive data about astrocyte morphology and physiology in vivo and to better integrate them in data-driven computational models. Broadening the discussion about theoretical approaches and expanding the computational tools is necessary to better understand astrocytes' roles in brain functions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiina Manninen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 3, FI-33720, Tampere, Finland.
| | - Jugoslava Aćimović
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 3, FI-33720, Tampere, Finland
| | - Marja-Leena Linne
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Korkeakoulunkatu 3, FI-33720, Tampere, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Linne ML, Aćimović J, Saudargiene A, Manninen T. Neuron-Glia Interactions and Brain Circuits. ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY 2022; 1359:87-103. [PMID: 35471536 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-89439-9_4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that glial cells take an active role in a number of brain functions that were previously attributed solely to neurons. For example, astrocytes, one type of glial cells, have been shown to promote coordinated activation of neuronal networks, modulate sensory-evoked neuronal network activity, and influence brain state transitions during development. This reinforces the idea that astrocytes not only provide the "housekeeping" for the neurons, but that they also play a vital role in supporting and expanding the functions of brain circuits and networks. Despite this accumulated knowledge, the field of computational neuroscience has mostly focused on modeling neuronal functions, ignoring the glial cells and the interactions they have with the neurons. In this chapter, we introduce the biology of neuron-glia interactions, summarize the existing computational models and tools, and emphasize the glial properties that may be important in modeling brain functions in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marja-Leena Linne
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
| | - Jugoslava Aćimović
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Ausra Saudargiene
- Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.,Department of Informatics, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Tiina Manninen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Verisokin AY, Verveyko DV, Postnov DE, Brazhe AR. Modeling of Astrocyte Networks: Toward Realistic Topology and Dynamics. Front Cell Neurosci 2021; 15:645068. [PMID: 33746715 PMCID: PMC7973220 DOI: 10.3389/fncel.2021.645068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 02/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Neuronal firing and neuron-to-neuron synaptic wiring are currently widely described as orchestrated by astrocytes—elaborately ramified glial cells tiling the cortical and hippocampal space into non-overlapping domains, each covering hundreds of individual dendrites and hundreds thousands synapses. A key component to astrocytic signaling is the dynamics of cytosolic Ca2+ which displays multiscale spatiotemporal patterns from short confined elemental Ca2+ events (puffs) to Ca2+ waves expanding through many cells. Here, we synthesize the current understanding of astrocyte morphology, coupling local synaptic activity to astrocytic Ca2+ in perisynaptic astrocytic processes and morphology-defined mechanisms of Ca2+ regulation in a distributed model. To this end, we build simplified realistic data-driven spatial network templates and compile model equations as defined by local cell morphology. The input to the model is spatially uncorrelated stochastic synaptic activity. The proposed modeling approach is validated by statistics of simulated Ca2+ transients at a single cell level. In multicellular templates we observe regular sequences of cell entrainment in Ca2+ waves, as a result of interplay between stochastic input and morphology variability between individual astrocytes. Our approach adds spatial dimension to the existing astrocyte models by employment of realistic morphology while retaining enough flexibility and scalability to be embedded in multiscale heterocellular models of neural tissue. We conclude that the proposed approach provides a useful description of neuron-driven Ca2+-activity in the astrocyte syncytium.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Darya V Verveyko
- Department of Theoretical Physics, Kursk State University, Kursk, Russia
| | - Dmitry E Postnov
- Department of Optics and Biophotonics, Saratov State University, Saratov, Russia
| | - Alexey R Brazhe
- Department of Biophysics, Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Molecular Neurobiology, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry RAS, Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Manninen T, Saudargiene A, Linne ML. Astrocyte-mediated spike-timing-dependent long-term depression modulates synaptic properties in the developing cortex. PLoS Comput Biol 2020; 16:e1008360. [PMID: 33170856 PMCID: PMC7654831 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Astrocytes have been shown to modulate synaptic transmission and plasticity in specific cortical synapses, but our understanding of the underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms remains limited. Here we present a new biophysicochemical model of a somatosensory cortical layer 4 to layer 2/3 synapse to study the role of astrocytes in spike-timing-dependent long-term depression (t-LTD) in vivo. By applying the synapse model and electrophysiological data recorded from rodent somatosensory cortex, we show that a signal from a postsynaptic neuron, orchestrated by endocannabinoids, astrocytic calcium signaling, and presynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors coupled with calcineurin signaling, induces t-LTD which is sensitive to the temporal difference between post- and presynaptic firing. We predict for the first time the dynamics of astrocyte-mediated molecular mechanisms underlying t-LTD and link complex biochemical networks at presynaptic, postsynaptic, and astrocytic sites to the time window of t-LTD induction. During t-LTD a single astrocyte acts as a delay factor for fast neuronal activity and integrates fast neuronal sensory processing with slow non-neuronal processing to modulate synaptic properties in the brain. Our results suggest that astrocytes play a critical role in synaptic computation during postnatal development and are of paramount importance in guiding the development of brain circuit functions, learning and memory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiina Manninen
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Ausra Saudargiene
- Neuroscience Institute, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania
- Department of Informatics, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania
| | - Marja-Leena Linne
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hanson-Heine MWD, Ashmore AP. Computational chemistry experiments performed directly on a blockchain virtual computer. Chem Sci 2020; 11:4644-4647. [PMID: 34122919 PMCID: PMC8159212 DOI: 10.1039/d0sc01523g] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 04/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Blockchain technology has had a substantial impact across multiple disciplines, creating new methods for storing and processing data with improved transparency, immutability, and reproducibility. These developments come at a time when the reproducibility of many scientific findings has been called into question, including computational studies. Here we present a computational chemistry simulation run directly on a blockchain virtual machine, using a harmonic potential to model the vibration of carbon monoxide. The results demonstrate for the first time that computational science calculations are feasible entirely within a blockchain environment and that they can be used to increase transparency and accessibility across the computational sciences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Alexander P Ashmore
- School of Computing and Communications, The Open University Walton Hall, Kents Hill Milton Keynes MK7 6AA UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Denizot A, Arizono M, Nägerl UV, Soula H, Berry H. Simulation of calcium signaling in fine astrocytic processes: Effect of spatial properties on spontaneous activity. PLoS Comput Biol 2019; 15:e1006795. [PMID: 31425510 PMCID: PMC6726244 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Revised: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 07/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Astrocytes, a glial cell type of the central nervous system, have emerged as detectors and regulators of neuronal information processing. Astrocyte excitability resides in transient variations of free cytosolic calcium concentration over a range of temporal and spatial scales, from sub-microdomains to waves propagating throughout the cell. Despite extensive experimental approaches, it is not clear how these signals are transmitted to and integrated within an astrocyte. The localization of the main molecular actors and the geometry of the system, including the spatial organization of calcium channels IP3R, are deemed essential. However, as most calcium signals occur in astrocytic ramifications that are too fine to be resolved by conventional light microscopy, most of those spatial data are unknown and computational modeling remains the only methodology to study this issue. Here, we propose an IP3R-mediated calcium signaling model for dynamics in such small sub-cellular volumes. To account for the expected stochasticity and low copy numbers, our model is both spatially explicit and particle-based. Extensive simulations show that spontaneous calcium signals arise in the model via the interplay between excitability and stochasticity. The model reproduces the main forms of calcium signals and indicates that their frequency crucially depends on the spatial organization of the IP3R channels. Importantly, we show that two processes expressing exactly the same calcium channels can display different types of calcium signals depending on the spatial organization of the channels. Our model with realistic process volume and calcium concentrations successfully reproduces spontaneous calcium signals that we measured in calcium micro-domains with confocal microscopy and predicts that local variations of calcium indicators might contribute to the diversity of calcium signals observed in astrocytes. To our knowledge, this model is the first model suited to investigate calcium dynamics in fine astrocytic processes and to propose plausible mechanisms responsible for their variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Audrey Denizot
- INRIA, F-69603, Villeurbanne, France
- Univ Lyon, LIRIS, UMR5205 CNRS, F-69621, Villeurbanne, France
| | - Misa Arizono
- Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, CNRS UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
| | - U. Valentin Nägerl
- Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- Interdisciplinary Institute for Neuroscience, CNRS UMR 5297, Bordeaux, France
| | - Hédi Soula
- INRIA, F-69603, Villeurbanne, France
- Univ P&M Curie, CRC, INSERM UMRS 1138, F-75006, Paris, France
| | - Hugues Berry
- INRIA, F-69603, Villeurbanne, France
- Univ Lyon, LIRIS, UMR5205 CNRS, F-69621, Villeurbanne, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Liu DM, Salganik MJ. Successes and Struggles with Computational Reproducibility: Lessons from the Fragile Families Challenge. SOCIUS : SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH FOR A DYNAMIC WORLD 2019; 5:10.1177/2378023119849803. [PMID: 37309413 PMCID: PMC10260256 DOI: 10.1177/2378023119849803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Reproducibility is fundamental to science, and an important component of reproducibility is computational reproducibility: the ability of a researcher to recreate the results of a published study using the original author's raw data and code. Although most people agree that computational reproducibility is important, it is still difficult to achieve in practice. In this article, the authors describe their approach to enabling computational reproducibility for the 12 articles in this special issue of Socius about the Fragile Families Challenge. The approach draws on two tools commonly used by professional software engineers but not widely used by academic researchers: software containers (e.g., Docker) and cloud computing (e.g., Amazon Web Services). These tools made it possible to standardize the computing environment around each submission, which will ease computational reproducibility both today and in the future. Drawing on their successes and struggles, the authors conclude with recommendations to researchers and journals.
Collapse
|
10
|
Miłkowski M, Hensel WM, Hohol M. Replicability or reproducibility? On the replication crisis in computational neuroscience and sharing only relevant detail. J Comput Neurosci 2018; 45:163-172. [PMID: 30377880 PMCID: PMC6306493 DOI: 10.1007/s10827-018-0702-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2018] [Revised: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Replicability and reproducibility of computational models has been somewhat understudied by "the replication movement." In this paper, we draw on methodological studies into the replicability of psychological experiments and on the mechanistic account of explanation to analyze the functions of model replications and model reproductions in computational neuroscience. We contend that model replicability, or independent researchers' ability to obtain the same output using original code and data, and model reproducibility, or independent researchers' ability to recreate a model without original code, serve different functions and fail for different reasons. This means that measures designed to improve model replicability may not enhance (and, in some cases, may actually damage) model reproducibility. We claim that although both are undesirable, low model reproducibility poses more of a threat to long-term scientific progress than low model replicability. In our opinion, low model reproducibility stems mostly from authors' omitting to provide crucial information in scientific papers and we stress that sharing all computer code and data is not a solution. Reports of computational studies should remain selective and include all and only relevant bits of code.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcin Miłkowski
- Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Nowy Świat 72, 00-330, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Witold M Hensel
- Faculty of History and Sociology, University of Białystok, Plac NZS 1, 15-420, Białystok, Poland
| | - Mateusz Hohol
- Copernicus Center for Interdisciplinary Studies, Jagiellonian University, Szczepańska 1/5, 31-011, Kraków, Poland.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Blundell I, Brette R, Cleland TA, Close TG, Coca D, Davison AP, Diaz-Pier S, Fernandez Musoles C, Gleeson P, Goodman DFM, Hines M, Hopkins MW, Kumbhar P, Lester DR, Marin B, Morrison A, Müller E, Nowotny T, Peyser A, Plotnikov D, Richmond P, Rowley A, Rumpe B, Stimberg M, Stokes AB, Tomkins A, Trensch G, Woodman M, Eppler JM. Code Generation in Computational Neuroscience: A Review of Tools and Techniques. Front Neuroinform 2018; 12:68. [PMID: 30455637 PMCID: PMC6230720 DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2018.00068] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 09/12/2018] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Advances in experimental techniques and computational power allowing researchers to gather anatomical and electrophysiological data at unprecedented levels of detail have fostered the development of increasingly complex models in computational neuroscience. Large-scale, biophysically detailed cell models pose a particular set of computational challenges, and this has led to the development of a number of domain-specific simulators. At the other level of detail, the ever growing variety of point neuron models increases the implementation barrier even for those based on the relatively simple integrate-and-fire neuron model. Independently of the model complexity, all modeling methods crucially depend on an efficient and accurate transformation of mathematical model descriptions into efficiently executable code. Neuroscientists usually publish model descriptions in terms of the mathematical equations underlying them. However, actually simulating them requires they be translated into code. This can cause problems because errors may be introduced if this process is carried out by hand, and code written by neuroscientists may not be very computationally efficient. Furthermore, the translated code might be generated for different hardware platforms, operating system variants or even written in different languages and thus cannot easily be combined or even compared. Two main approaches to addressing this issues have been followed. The first is to limit users to a fixed set of optimized models, which limits flexibility. The second is to allow model definitions in a high level interpreted language, although this may limit performance. Recently, a third approach has become increasingly popular: using code generation to automatically translate high level descriptions into efficient low level code to combine the best of previous approaches. This approach also greatly enriches efforts to standardize simulator-independent model description languages. In the past few years, a number of code generation pipelines have been developed in the computational neuroscience community, which differ considerably in aim, scope and functionality. This article provides an overview of existing pipelines currently used within the community and contrasts their capabilities and the technologies and concepts behind them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Inga Blundell
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6), Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6), JARA BRAIN Institute I, Jülich, Germany
| | - Romain Brette
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France
| | - Thomas A. Cleland
- Department of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States
| | - Thomas G. Close
- Monash Biomedical Imaging, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Daniel Coca
- Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew P. Davison
- Unité de Neurosciences, Information et Complexité, CNRS FRE 3693, Gif sur Yvette, France
| | - Sandra Diaz-Pier
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Simulation Lab Neuroscience, Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Institute for Advanced Simulation, Jülich Aachen Research Alliance, Jülich, Germany
| | - Carlos Fernandez Musoles
- Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Padraig Gleeson
- Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Dan F. M. Goodman
- Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Michael Hines
- Department of Neurobiology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
| | - Michael W. Hopkins
- Advanced Processor Technologies Group, School of Computer ScienceUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Pramod Kumbhar
- Blue Brain Project, EPFLCampus Biotech, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - David R. Lester
- Advanced Processor Technologies Group, School of Computer ScienceUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Bóris Marin
- Department of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
- Centro de Matemática, Computação e CogniçãoUniversidade Federal do ABC, São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil
| | - Abigail Morrison
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-6), Institute for Advanced Simulation (IAS-6), JARA BRAIN Institute I, Jülich, Germany
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Simulation Lab Neuroscience, Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Institute for Advanced Simulation, Jülich Aachen Research Alliance, Jülich, Germany
- Faculty of Psychology, Institute of Cognitive NeuroscienceRuhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Eric Müller
- Kirchhoff-Institute for PhysicsUniversität Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Nowotny
- Centre for Computational Neuroscience and Robotics, School of Engineering and InformaticsUniversity of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander Peyser
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Simulation Lab Neuroscience, Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Institute for Advanced Simulation, Jülich Aachen Research Alliance, Jülich, Germany
| | - Dimitri Plotnikov
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Simulation Lab Neuroscience, Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Institute for Advanced Simulation, Jülich Aachen Research Alliance, Jülich, Germany
- RWTH Aachen University, Software EngineeringJülich Aachen Research Alliance, Aachen, Germany
| | - Paul Richmond
- Department of Computer ScienceUniversity of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Andrew Rowley
- Advanced Processor Technologies Group, School of Computer ScienceUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Bernhard Rumpe
- RWTH Aachen University, Software EngineeringJülich Aachen Research Alliance, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marcel Stimberg
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, CNRS, Institut de la Vision, Paris, France
| | - Alan B. Stokes
- Advanced Processor Technologies Group, School of Computer ScienceUniversity of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | - Adam Tomkins
- Department of Automatic Control and Systems Engineering, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Guido Trensch
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Simulation Lab Neuroscience, Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Institute for Advanced Simulation, Jülich Aachen Research Alliance, Jülich, Germany
| | - Marmaduke Woodman
- Institut de Neurosciences des SystèmesAix Marseille Université, Marseille, France
| | - Jochen Martin Eppler
- Forschungszentrum Jülich, Simulation Lab Neuroscience, Jülich Supercomputing Centre, Institute for Advanced Simulation, Jülich Aachen Research Alliance, Jülich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brazhe AR, Postnov DE, Sosnovtseva O. Astrocyte calcium signaling: Interplay between structural and dynamical patterns. CHAOS (WOODBURY, N.Y.) 2018; 28:106320. [PMID: 30384660 DOI: 10.1063/1.5037153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2018] [Accepted: 09/24/2018] [Indexed: 06/08/2023]
Abstract
Inspired by calcium activity in astrocytes, which is different in the cell body and thick branches on the one hand and thin branchlets and leaflets on the other hand, we formulate a concept of spatially partitioned oscillators. These are inhomogeneous media with regions having different excitability properties, with a global dynamics governed by spatial configuration of such regions. Due to a high surface-to-volume ratio, calcium dynamics in astrocytic leaflets is dominated by transmembrane currents, while somatic calcium dynamics relies on exchange with intracellular stores, mediated by IP 3 , which is in turn synthesized in the space nearby the plasma membrane. Reciprocal coupling via diffusion of calcium and IP 3 between the two regions makes the spatial configuration an essential contributor to overall dynamics. Due to these features, the mechanisms governing the pattern formation of calcium dynamics differ from classical excitable systems with noise or from networks of clustered oscillators. We show how geometrical inhomogeneity can play an ordering role allowing for stable scenarios for calcium wave initiation and propagation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A R Brazhe
- Biological Faculty, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Leninskie Gory 1/24, 119234 Moscow, Russia
| | - D E Postnov
- Department of Physics, Saratov State University, Astrakhanskaya st. 83, 410012 Saratov, Russia
| | - O Sosnovtseva
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200 Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Savtchenko LP, Bard L, Jensen TP, Reynolds JP, Kraev I, Medvedev N, Stewart MG, Henneberger C, Rusakov DA. Disentangling astroglial physiology with a realistic cell model in silico. Nat Commun 2018; 9:3554. [PMID: 30177844 PMCID: PMC6120909 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-05896-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2018] [Accepted: 07/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Electrically non-excitable astroglia take up neurotransmitters, buffer extracellular K+ and generate Ca2+ signals that release molecular regulators of neural circuitry. The underlying machinery remains enigmatic, mainly because the sponge-like astrocyte morphology has been difficult to access experimentally or explore theoretically. Here, we systematically incorporate multi-scale, tri-dimensional astroglial architecture into a realistic multi-compartmental cell model, which we constrain by empirical tests and integrate into the NEURON computational biophysical environment. This approach is implemented as a flexible astrocyte-model builder ASTRO. As a proof-of-concept, we explore an in silico astrocyte to evaluate basic cell physiology features inaccessible experimentally. Our simulations suggest that currents generated by glutamate transporters or K+ channels have negligible distant effects on membrane voltage and that individual astrocytes can successfully handle extracellular K+ hotspots. We show how intracellular Ca2+ buffers affect Ca2+ waves and why the classical Ca2+ sparks-and-puffs mechanism is theoretically compatible with common readouts of astroglial Ca2+ imaging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonid P Savtchenko
- UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
| | - Lucie Bard
- UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Thomas P Jensen
- UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - James P Reynolds
- UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
| | - Igor Kraev
- The Open University, Milton Keynes, MK7 6AA, UK
| | | | | | - Christian Henneberger
- UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, UK
- German Center of Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Bonn, 53127, Germany
- Institute of Cellular Neurosciences, University of Bonn Medical School, Bonn, 53127, Germany
| | - Dmitri A Rusakov
- UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, WC1N 3BG, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Manninen T, Aćimović J, Havela R, Teppola H, Linne ML. Challenges in Reproducibility, Replicability, and Comparability of Computational Models and Tools for Neuronal and Glial Networks, Cells, and Subcellular Structures. Front Neuroinform 2018; 12:20. [PMID: 29765315 PMCID: PMC5938413 DOI: 10.3389/fninf.2018.00020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2018] [Accepted: 04/06/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The possibility to replicate and reproduce published research results is one of the biggest challenges in all areas of science. In computational neuroscience, there are thousands of models available. However, it is rarely possible to reimplement the models based on the information in the original publication, let alone rerun the models just because the model implementations have not been made publicly available. We evaluate and discuss the comparability of a versatile choice of simulation tools: tools for biochemical reactions and spiking neuronal networks, and relatively new tools for growth in cell cultures. The replicability and reproducibility issues are considered for computational models that are equally diverse, including the models for intracellular signal transduction of neurons and glial cells, in addition to single glial cells, neuron-glia interactions, and selected examples of spiking neuronal networks. We also address the comparability of the simulation results with one another to comprehend if the studied models can be used to answer similar research questions. In addition to presenting the challenges in reproducibility and replicability of published results in computational neuroscience, we highlight the need for developing recommendations and good practices for publishing simulation tools and computational models. Model validation and flexible model description must be an integral part of the tool used to simulate and develop computational models. Constant improvement on experimental techniques and recording protocols leads to increasing knowledge about the biophysical mechanisms in neural systems. This poses new challenges for computational neuroscience: extended or completely new computational methods and models may be required. Careful evaluation and categorization of the existing models and tools provide a foundation for these future needs, for constructing multiscale models or extending the models to incorporate additional or more detailed biophysical mechanisms. Improving the quality of publications in computational neuroscience, enabling progressive building of advanced computational models and tools, can be achieved only through adopting publishing standards which underline replicability and reproducibility of research results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiina Manninen
- Computational Neuroscience Group, BioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
- Laboratory of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
| | - Jugoslava Aćimović
- Computational Neuroscience Group, BioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
- Laboratory of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
| | - Riikka Havela
- Computational Neuroscience Group, BioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
- Laboratory of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
| | - Heidi Teppola
- Computational Neuroscience Group, BioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
- Laboratory of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
| | - Marja-Leena Linne
- Computational Neuroscience Group, BioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
- Laboratory of Signal Processing, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Manninen T, Havela R, Linne ML. Computational Models for Calcium-Mediated Astrocyte Functions. Front Comput Neurosci 2018; 12:14. [PMID: 29670517 PMCID: PMC5893839 DOI: 10.3389/fncom.2018.00014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2018] [Accepted: 02/28/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The computational neuroscience field has heavily concentrated on the modeling of neuronal functions, largely ignoring other brain cells, including one type of glial cell, the astrocytes. Despite the short history of modeling astrocytic functions, we were delighted about the hundreds of models developed so far to study the role of astrocytes, most often in calcium dynamics, synchronization, information transfer, and plasticity in vitro, but also in vascular events, hyperexcitability, and homeostasis. Our goal here is to present the state-of-the-art in computational modeling of astrocytes in order to facilitate better understanding of the functions and dynamics of astrocytes in the brain. Due to the large number of models, we concentrated on a hundred models that include biophysical descriptions for calcium signaling and dynamics in astrocytes. We categorized the models into four groups: single astrocyte models, astrocyte network models, neuron-astrocyte synapse models, and neuron-astrocyte network models to ease their use in future modeling projects. We characterized the models based on which earlier models were used for building the models and which type of biological entities were described in the astrocyte models. Features of the models were compared and contrasted so that similarities and differences were more readily apparent. We discovered that most of the models were basically generated from a small set of previously published models with small variations. However, neither citations to all the previous models with similar core structure nor explanations of what was built on top of the previous models were provided, which made it possible, in some cases, to have the same models published several times without an explicit intention to make new predictions about the roles of astrocytes in brain functions. Furthermore, only a few of the models are available online which makes it difficult to reproduce the simulation results and further develop the models. Thus, we would like to emphasize that only via reproducible research are we able to build better computational models for astrocytes, which truly advance science. Our study is the first to characterize in detail the biophysical and biochemical mechanisms that have been modeled for astrocytes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiina Manninen
- Computational Neuroscience Group, BioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Marja-Leena Linne
- Computational Neuroscience Group, BioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Rougier NP, Hinsen K, Alexandre F, Arildsen T, Barba LA, Benureau FC, Brown CT, de Buyl P, Caglayan O, Davison AP, Delsuc MA, Detorakis G, Diem AK, Drix D, Enel P, Girard B, Guest O, Hall MG, Henriques RN, Hinaut X, Jaron KS, Khamassi M, Klein A, Manninen T, Marchesi P, McGlinn D, Metzner C, Petchey O, Plesser HE, Poisot T, Ram K, Ram Y, Roesch E, Rossant C, Rostami V, Shifman A, Stachelek J, Stimberg M, Stollmeier F, Vaggi F, Viejo G, Vitay J, Vostinar AE, Yurchak R, Zito T. Sustainable computational science: the ReScience initiative. PeerJ Comput Sci 2017; 3:e142. [PMID: 34722870 PMCID: PMC8530091 DOI: 10.7717/peerj-cs.142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Accepted: 11/15/2017] [Indexed: 05/30/2023]
Abstract
Computer science offers a large set of tools for prototyping, writing, running, testing, validating, sharing and reproducing results; however, computational science lags behind. In the best case, authors may provide their source code as a compressed archive and they may feel confident their research is reproducible. But this is not exactly true. James Buckheit and David Donoho proposed more than two decades ago that an article about computational results is advertising, not scholarship. The actual scholarship is the full software environment, code, and data that produced the result. This implies new workflows, in particular in peer-reviews. Existing journals have been slow to adapt: source codes are rarely requested and are hardly ever actually executed to check that they produce the results advertised in the article. ReScience is a peer-reviewed journal that targets computational research and encourages the explicit replication of already published research, promoting new and open-source implementations in order to ensure that the original research can be replicated from its description. To achieve this goal, the whole publishing chain is radically different from other traditional scientific journals. ReScience resides on GitHub where each new implementation of a computational study is made available together with comments, explanations, and software tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Konrad Hinsen
- Centre de Biophysique Moléculaire UPR4301, CNRS, Orléans, France
| | | | - Thomas Arildsen
- Department of Electronic Systems, Technical Faculty of IT and Design, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Lorena A. Barba
- Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The George Washington University, Washington, D.C., USA
| | | | - C. Titus Brown
- Department of Population Health and Reproduction, University of California Davis, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Pierre de Buyl
- Instituut voor Theoretische Fysica, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ozan Caglayan
- Laboratoire d’Informatique (LIUM), Le Mans University, Le Mans, France
| | | | - Marc-André Delsuc
- Institut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, Illkirch, France
| | - Georgios Detorakis
- Department of Cognitive Sciences, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA, USA
| | - Alexandra K. Diem
- Computational Engineering and Design, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Damien Drix
- Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Pierre Enel
- Department of Neuroscience, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Benoît Girard
- Institute of Intelligent Systems and Robotics, Sorbonne Universités - UPMC Univ Paris 06 - CNRS, Paris, France
| | - Olivia Guest
- Experimental Psychology, University College London, London, Greater London, United Kingdom
| | - Matt G. Hall
- UCL Great Ormond St Institute of Child Health, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rafael N. Henriques
- Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Champalimaud Neuroscience Program, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Kamil S. Jaron
- Department of Ecology and Evolution, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Mehdi Khamassi
- Institute of Intelligent Systems and Robotics, Sorbonne Universités - UPMC Univ Paris 06 - CNRS, Paris, France
| | - Almar Klein
- Independent scholar, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Tiina Manninen
- BioMediTech Institute and Faculty of Biomedical Sciences and Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
| | - Pietro Marchesi
- Swammerdam Institute for Life Sciences, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel McGlinn
- Department of Biology, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, USA
| | - Christoph Metzner
- Centre for Computer Science and Informatics Research, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, United Kingdom
| | - Owen Petchey
- Department of Evolutionary Biology and Environmental Studies, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Hans Ekkehard Plesser
- Faculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Aas, Norway
| | - Timothée Poisot
- Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Karthik Ram
- Berkeley Institute for Data Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Yoav Ram
- Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Etienne Roesch
- Centre for Integrative Neuroscience, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom
| | - Cyrille Rossant
- Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Vahid Rostami
- Institute of Neuroscience & Medicine, Juelich Forschungszentrum, Jülich, Germany
| | - Aaron Shifman
- Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jemma Stachelek
- Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - Marcel Stimberg
- Sorbonne Universités/UPMC Univ Paris 06/INSERM/CNRS/Institut de la Vision, Paris, France
| | - Frank Stollmeier
- Max Planck Institute for Dynamics and Self-Organization, Göttingen, Lower Saxony, Germany
| | | | - Guillaume Viejo
- Institute of Intelligent Systems and Robotics, Sorbonne Universités - UPMC Univ Paris 06 - CNRS, Paris, France
| | - Julien Vitay
- Department of Computer Science, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Saxony, Germany
| | - Anya E. Vostinar
- Department of Computer Science, Grinnell College, Grinnell, IA, USA
| | | | - Tiziano Zito
- Neural Information Processing Group, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|