1
|
Trubshaw M, Gohil C, Yoganathan K, Kohl O, Edmond E, Proudfoot M, Thompson AG, Talbot K, Stagg CJ, Nobre AC, Woolrich M, Turner MR. The cortical neurophysiological signature of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Brain Commun 2024; 6:fcae164. [PMID: 38779353 PMCID: PMC11109820 DOI: 10.1093/braincomms/fcae164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/09/2024] [Indexed: 05/25/2024] Open
Abstract
The progressive loss of motor function characteristic of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is associated with widespread cortical pathology extending beyond primary motor regions. Increasing muscle weakness reflects a dynamic, variably compensated brain network disorder. In the quest for biomarkers to accelerate therapeutic assessment, the high temporal resolution of magnetoencephalography is uniquely able to non-invasively capture micro-magnetic fields generated by neuronal activity across the entire cortex simultaneously. This study examined task-free magnetoencephalography to characterize the cortical oscillatory signature of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis for having potential as a pharmacodynamic biomarker. Eight to ten minutes of magnetoencephalography in the task-free, eyes-open state was recorded in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (n = 36) and healthy age-matched controls (n = 51), followed by a structural MRI scan for co-registration. Extracted magnetoencephalography metrics from the delta, theta, alpha, beta, low-gamma, high-gamma frequency bands included oscillatory power (regional activity), 1/f exponent (complexity) and amplitude envelope correlation (connectivity). Groups were compared using a permutation-based general linear model with correction for multiple comparisons and confounders. To test whether the extracted metrics could predict disease severity, a random forest regression model was trained and evaluated using nested leave-one-out cross-validation. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis was characterized by reduced sensorimotor beta band and increased high-gamma band power. Within the premotor cortex, increased disability was associated with a reduced 1/f exponent. Increased disability was more widely associated with increased global connectivity in the delta, theta and high-gamma bands. Intra-hemispherically, increased disability scores were particularly associated with increases in temporal connectivity and inter-hemispherically with increases in frontal and occipital connectivity. The random forest model achieved a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.24. The combined reduction in cortical sensorimotor beta and rise in gamma power is compatible with the established hypothesis of loss of inhibitory, GABAergic interneuronal circuits in pathogenesis. A lower 1/f exponent potentially reflects a more excitable cortex and a pathology unique to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis when considered with the findings published in other neurodegenerative disorders. Power and complexity changes corroborate with the results from paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation. Increased magnetoencephalography connectivity in worsening disability is thought to represent compensatory responses to a failing motor system. Restoration of cortical beta and gamma band power has significant potential to be tested in an experimental medicine setting. Magnetoencephalography-based measures have potential as sensitive outcome measures of therapeutic benefit in drug trials and may have a wider diagnostic value with further study, including as predictive markers in asymptomatic carriers of disease-causing genetic variants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Trubshaw
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Chetan Gohil
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK
| | - Katie Yoganathan
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Oliver Kohl
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK
| | - Evan Edmond
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Malcolm Proudfoot
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Alexander G Thompson
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Kevin Talbot
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Charlotte J Stagg
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Anna C Nobre
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK
| | - Mark Woolrich
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK
| | - Martin R Turner
- Oxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7JX, UK
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hermann KL, Singh SR, Rosenthal IA, Pantazis D, Conway BR. Temporal dynamics of the neural representation of hue and luminance polarity. Nat Commun 2022; 13:661. [PMID: 35115511 PMCID: PMC8814185 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28249-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Hue and luminance contrast are basic visual features. Here we use multivariate analyses of magnetoencephalography data to investigate the timing of the neural computations that extract them, and whether they depend on common neural circuits. We show that hue and luminance-contrast polarity can be decoded from MEG data and, with lower accuracy, both features can be decoded across changes in the other feature. These results are consistent with the existence of both common and separable neural mechanisms. The decoding time course is earlier and more temporally precise for luminance polarity than hue, a result that does not depend on task, suggesting that luminance contrast is an updating signal that separates visual events. Meanwhile, cross-temporal generalization is slightly greater for representations of hue compared to luminance polarity, providing a neural correlate of the preeminence of hue in perceptual grouping and memory. Finally, decoding of luminance polarity varies depending on the hues used to obtain training and testing data. The pattern of results is consistent with observations that luminance contrast is mediated by both L-M and S cone sub-cortical mechanisms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine L Hermann
- Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
- Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Shridhar R Singh
- Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
| | - Isabelle A Rosenthal
- Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA
- Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA, 91125, USA
| | - Dimitrios Pantazis
- McGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA
| | - Bevil R Conway
- Laboratory of Sensorimotor Research, National Eye Institute, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
- National Institute of Mental Health, Bethesda, MD, 20892, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kupers ER, Benson NC, Winawer J. A visual encoding model links magnetoencephalography signals to neural synchrony in human cortex. Neuroimage 2021; 245:118655. [PMID: 34687857 PMCID: PMC8788390 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118655] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Synchronization of neuronal responses over large distances is hypothesized to be important for many cortical functions. However, no straightforward methods exist to estimate synchrony non-invasively in the living human brain. MEG and EEG measure the whole brain, but the sensors pool over large, overlapping cortical regions, obscuring the underlying neural synchrony. Here, we developed a model from stimulus to cortex to MEG sensors to disentangle neural synchrony from spatial pooling of the instrument. We find that synchrony across cortex has a surprisingly large and systematic effect on predicted MEG spatial topography. We then conducted visual MEG experiments and separated responses into stimulus-locked and broadband components. The stimulus-locked topography was similar to model predictions assuming synchronous neural sources, whereas the broadband topography was similar to model predictions assuming asynchronous sources. We infer that visual stimulation elicits two distinct types of neural responses, one highly synchronous and one largely asynchronous across cortex.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline R Kupers
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, United States; Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, United States; Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
| | - Noah C Benson
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, United States; Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, United States; eSciences Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States
| | - Jonathan Winawer
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, United States; Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kupers ER, Edadan A, Benson NC, Zuiderbaan W, de Jong MC, Dumoulin SO, Winawer J. A population receptive field model of the magnetoencephalography response. Neuroimage 2021; 244:118554. [PMID: 34509622 PMCID: PMC8631249 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2020] [Revised: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Computational models which predict the neurophysiological response from experimental stimuli have played an important role in human neuroimaging. One type of computational model, the population receptive field (pRF), has been used to describe cortical responses at the millimeter scale using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and electrocorticography (ECoG). However, pRF models are not widely used for non-invasive electromagnetic field measurements (EEG/MEG), because individual sensors pool responses originating from several centimeter of cortex, containing neural populations with widely varying spatial tuning. Here, we introduce a forward-modeling approach in which pRFs estimated from fMRI data are used to predict MEG sensor responses. Subjects viewed contrast-reversing bar stimuli sweeping across the visual field in separate fMRI and MEG sessions. Individual subject's pRFs were modeled on the cortical surface at the millimeter scale using the fMRI data. We then predicted cortical time series and projected these predictions to MEG sensors using a biophysical MEG forward model, accounting for the pooling across cortex. We compared the predicted MEG responses to observed visually evoked steady-state responses measured in the MEG session. We found that pRF parameters estimated by fMRI could explain a substantial fraction of the variance in steady-state MEG sensor responses (up to 60% in individual sensors). Control analyses in which we artificially perturbed either pRF size or pRF position reduced MEG prediction accuracy, indicating that MEG data are sensitive to pRF properties derived from fMRI. Our model provides a quantitative approach to link fMRI and MEG measurements, thereby enabling advances in our understanding of spatiotemporal dynamics in human visual field maps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline R Kupers
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, United States; Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, United States; Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, United States.
| | - Akhil Edadan
- Spinoza Center for Neuroimaging, Amsterdam 1105 BK, the Netherlands; Department of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CS, the Netherlands
| | - Noah C Benson
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, United States; Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, United States; Sciences Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, United States
| | | | - Maartje C de Jong
- Spinoza Center for Neuroimaging, Amsterdam 1105 BK, the Netherlands; Department of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1001 NK, the Netherlands; Amsterdam Brain and Cognition (ABC), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam 1001 NK, the Netherlands
| | - Serge O Dumoulin
- Spinoza Center for Neuroimaging, Amsterdam 1105 BK, the Netherlands; Department of Experimental Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht 3584 CS, the Netherlands; Department of Experimental and Applied Psychology, VU University, Amsterdam 1081 BT, the Netherlands
| | - Jonathan Winawer
- Department of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10003, United States; Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Popov T, Gips B, Kastner S, Jensen O. Spatial specificity of alpha oscillations in the human visual system. Hum Brain Mapp 2019; 40:4432-4440. [PMID: 31291043 PMCID: PMC6865453 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.24712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2019] [Revised: 06/06/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Alpha oscillations are strongly modulated by spatial attention. To what extent, the generators of cortical alpha oscillations are spatially distributed and have selectivity that can be related to retinotopic organization is a matter of continuous scientific debate. In the present report, neuromagnetic activity was quantified by means of spatial location tuning functions from 30 participants engaged in a visuospatial attention task. A cue presented briefly in one of 16 locations directing covert spatial attention resulted in a robust modulation of posterior alpha oscillations. The distribution of the alpha sources approximated the retinotopic organization of the human visual system known from hemodynamic studies. Better performance in terms of target identification was associated with a more spatially constrained alpha modulation. The present findings demonstrate that the generators of posterior alpha oscillations are retinotopically organized when modulated by spatial attention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tzvetan Popov
- Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental HealthHeidelberg UniversityMannheimGermany
| | - Bart Gips
- Center for Cognitive NeuroimagingDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and BehaviourNijmegenThe Netherlands
| | - Sabine Kastner
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton UniversityPrincetonNew Jersey
- Department of PsychologyPrinceton UniversityPrincetonNew Jersey
| | - Ole Jensen
- Center for Cognitive NeuroimagingDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition, and BehaviourNijmegenThe Netherlands
- Centre for Human Brain Health, School of PsychologyUniversity of BirminghamBirminghamUK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Early suppression effect in human primary visual cortex during Kanizsa illusion processing: A magnetoencephalographic evidence. Vis Neurosci 2016; 33:E007. [PMID: 27485162 DOI: 10.1017/s0952523816000031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Detection of illusory contours (ICs) such as Kanizsa figures is known to depend primarily upon the lateral occipital complex. Yet there is no universal agreement on the role of the primary visual cortex in this process; some existing evidence hints that an early stage of the visual response in V1 may involve relative suppression to Kanizsa figures compared with controls. Iso-oriented luminance borders, which are responsible for Kanizsa illusion, may evoke surround suppression in V1 and adjacent areas leading to the reduction in the initial response to Kanizsa figures. We attempted to test the existence, as well as to find localization and timing of the early suppression effect produced by Kanizsa figures in adult nonclinical human participants. We used two sizes of visual stimuli (4.5 and 9.0°) in order to probe the effect at two different levels of eccentricity; the stimuli were presented centrally in passive viewing conditions. We recorded magnetoencephalogram, which is more sensitive than electroencephalogram to activity originating from V1 and V2 areas. We restricted our analysis to the medial occipital area and the occipital pole, and to a 40-120 ms time window after the stimulus onset. By applying threshold-free cluster enhancement technique in combination with permutation statistics, we were able to detect the inverted IC effect-a relative suppression of the response to the Kanizsa figures compared with the control stimuli. The current finding is highly compatible with the explanation involving surround suppression evoked by iso-oriented collinear borders. The effect may be related to the principle of sparse coding, according to which V1 suppresses representations of inner parts of collinear assemblies as being informationally redundant. Such a mechanism is likely to be an important preliminary step preceding object contour detection.
Collapse
|
7
|
Inverso SA, Goh XL, Henriksson L, Vanni S, James AC. From evoked potentials to cortical currents: Resolving V1 and V2 components using retinotopy constrained source estimation without fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 2016; 37:1696-709. [PMID: 26870938 DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23128] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2015] [Revised: 01/12/2016] [Accepted: 01/19/2016] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite evoked potentials' (EP) ubiquity in research and clinical medicine, insights are limited to gross brain dynamics as it remains challenging to map surface potentials to their sources in specific cortical regions. Multiple sources cancellation due to cortical folding and cross-talk obscures close sources, e.g. between visual areas V1 and V2. Recently retinotopic functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) responses were used to constrain source locations to assist separating close sources and to determine cortical current generators. However, an fMRI is largely infeasible for routine EP investigation. We developed a novel method that replaces the fMRI derived retinotopic layout (RL) by an approach where the retinotopy and current estimates are generated from EEG or MEG signals and a standard clinical T1-weighted anatomical MRI. Using the EEG-RL, sources were localized to within 2 mm of the fMRI-RL constrained localized sources. The EEG-RL also produced V1 and V2 current waveforms that closely matched the fMRI-RL's (n = 2) r(1,198) = 0.99, P < 0.0001. Applying the method to subjects without fMRI (n = 4) demonstrates it generates waveforms that agree closely with the literature. Our advance allows investigators with their current EEG or MEG systems to create a library of brain models tuned to individual subjects' cortical folding in retinotopic maps, and should be applicable to auditory and somatosensory maps. The novel method developed expands EP's ability to study specific brain areas, revitalizing this well-worn technique. Hum Brain Mapp 37:1696-1709, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel A Inverso
- Eccles Institute of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.,Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Vision Science and Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.,Wyss Institute, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Xin-Lin Goh
- Eccles Institute of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.,Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Vision Science and Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| | - Linda Henriksson
- Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, Espoo, Finland.,AMI Centre, Aalto Neuroimaging, Aalto University, Finland
| | - Simo Vanni
- AMI Centre, Aalto Neuroimaging, Aalto University, Finland.,Clinical Neurosciences, Neurology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Andrew C James
- Eccles Institute of Neuroscience, John Curtin School of Medical Research, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia.,Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Vision Science and Research School of Biology, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shigihara Y, Zeki S. Parallel processing of face and house stimuli by V1 and specialized visual areas: a magnetoencephalographic (MEG) study. Front Hum Neurosci 2014; 8:901. [PMID: 25426050 PMCID: PMC4224090 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2014] [Accepted: 10/21/2014] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
We used easily distinguishable stimuli of faces and houses constituted from straight lines, with the aim of learning whether they activate V1 on the one hand, and the specialized areas that are critical for the processing of faces and houses on the other, with similar latencies. Eighteen subjects took part in the experiment, which used magnetoencephalography (MEG) coupled to analytical methods to detect the time course of the earliest responses which these stimuli provoke in these cortical areas. Both categories of stimuli activated V1 and areas of the visual cortex outside it at around 40 ms after stimulus onset, and the amplitude elicited by face stimuli was significantly larger than that elicited by house stimuli. These results suggest that “low-level” and “high-level” features of form stimuli are processed in parallel by V1 and visual areas outside it. Taken together with our previous results on the processing of simple geometric forms (Shgihara and Zeki, 2013; Shigihara and Zeki, 2014), the present ones reinforce the conclusion that parallel processing is an important component in the strategy used by the brain to process and construct forms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Semir Zeki
- Wellcome Laboratory of Neurobiology, University College London London, UK
| |
Collapse
|