DeID - a data sharing tool for neuroimaging studies

Dyslexia Data Consortium Repository: A Data Sharing and Delivery Platform for Research

Specific learning disability of reading, or dyslexia, affects 5-17% of the population in the United States. Research on the neurobiology of dyslexia has included studies with relatively small sample sizes across research sites, thus limiting inference and the application of novel methods, such as deep learning. To address these issues and facilitate open science, we developed an online platform for data-sharing and advanced research programs to enhance opportunities for replication by providing researchers with secondary data that can be used in their research (https://www.dyslexiadata.org). This platform integrates a set of well-designed machine learning algorithms and tools to generate secondary datasets, such as cortical thickness, as well as regional brain volume metrics that have been consistently associated with dyslexia. Researchers can access shared data to address fundamental questions about dyslexia and development, replicate research findings, apply new methods, and educate the next generation of researchers. The overarching goal of this platform is to advance our understanding of a disorder that has significant academic, social, and economic impacts on children, their families, and society.

International data governance for neuroscience

As neuroscience projects increase in scale and cross international borders, different ethical principles, national and international laws, regulations, and policies for data sharing must be considered. These concerns are part of what is collectively called data governance. Whereas neuroscience data transcend borders, data governance is typically constrained within geopolitical boundaries. An international data governance framework and accompanying infrastructure can assist investigators, institutions, data repositories, and funders with navigating disparate policies. Here, we propose principles and operational considerations for how data governance in neuroscience can be navigated at an international scale and highlight gaps, challenges, and opportunities in a global brain data ecosystem. We consider how to approach data governance in a way that balances data protection requirements and the need for open science, so as to promote international collaboration through federated constructs such as the International Brain Initiative (IBI).

Fully synthetic neuroimaging data for replication and exploration

Scientific transparency, data exploration, and education are advanced through data sharing. However, risk for disclosure of personal information and institutional data sharing regulations can impede human subject/patient data sharing and thus limit open science initiatives. Sharing fully synthetic data is an alternative when it is not possible to share real or observed data. Here we describe a data sharing approach that borrows principles and methods from multiple imputation to replace observed values with synthetic values, thereby creating a fully synthetic neuroimaging dataset that accurately represents the covariance structure of the observed dataset. Predictor tables composed of demographic, site, behavioral and total intracranial volume (ICV) variables from 264 pediatric cases were used to create synthetic predictor tables, which were then used to synthesize gray matter images derived from T1-weighted data. The synthetic predictor tables demonstrated pooled variance and statistical estimates that closely approximated the observed data, as reflected in measures of efficiency and statistical bias. Similarly, the synthetic gray matter data accurately represented the variance and voxel-level associations with predictor variables (age, sex, verbal IQ, and ICV). The magnitude and spatial distribution of gray matter effects in the observed imaging data were replicated in the pooled results from the synthetic datasets. This approach for generating fully synthetic neuroimaging data has widespread potential for data sharing, including replication, new discovery, and education. Fully synthetic neuroimaging datasets can enable data-sharing because it accurately represents patterns of variance in the original data, while diminishing the risk of privacy disclosures that can accompany neuroimaging data sharing.

Facing privacy in neuroimaging: removing facial features degrades performance of image analysis methods

Background

Recent studies have created awareness that facial features can be reconstructed from high-resolution MRI. Therefore, data sharing in neuroimaging requires special attention to protect participants’ privacy. Facial features removal (FFR) could alleviate these concerns. We assessed the impact of three FFR methods on subsequent automated image analysis to obtain clinically relevant outcome measurements in three clinical groups.

Methods

FFR was performed using QuickShear, FaceMasking, and Defacing. In 110 subjects of Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative, normalized brain volumes (NBV) were measured by SIENAX. In 70 multiple sclerosis patients of the MAGNIMS Study Group, lesion volumes (WMLV) were measured by lesion prediction algorithm in lesion segmentation toolbox. In 84 glioblastoma patients of the PICTURE Study Group, tumor volumes (GBV) were measured by BraTumIA. Failed analyses on FFR-processed images were recorded. Only cases in which all image analyses completed successfully were analyzed. Differences between outcomes obtained from FFR-processed and full images were assessed, by quantifying the intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) for absolute agreement and by testing for systematic differences using paired t tests.

Results

Automated analysis methods failed in 0–19% of cases in FFR-processed images versus 0–2% of cases in full images. ICC for absolute agreement ranged from 0.312 (GBV after FaceMasking) to 0.998 (WMLV after Defacing). FaceMasking yielded higher NBV (p = 0.003) and WMLV (p ≤ 0.001). GBV was lower after QuickShear and Defacing (both p < 0.001).

Conclusions

All three outcome measures were affected differently by FFR, including failure of analysis methods and both “random” variation and systematic differences. Further study is warranted to ensure high-quality neuroimaging research while protecting participants’ privacy.

Key Points

• Protecting participants’ privacy when sharing MRI data is important.

• Impact of three facial features removal methods on subsequent analysis was assessed in three clinical groups.

• Removing facial features degrades performance of image analysis methods.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s00330-019-06459-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Common Brain Structure Findings Across Children with Varied Reading Disability Profiles

Dyslexia is a developmental disorder in reading that exhibits varied patterns of expression across children. Here we examined the degree to which different kinds of reading disabilities (defined as profiles or patterns of reading problems) contribute to brain morphology results in Jacobian determinant images that represent local brain shape and volume. A matched-pair brain morphometry approach was used to control for confounding from brain size and research site effects in this retrospective multi-site study of 134 children from eight different research sites. Parietal operculum, corona radiata, and internal capsule differences between cases and controls were consistently observed across children with evidence of classic dyslexia, specific comprehension deficit, and language learning disability. Thus, there can be common brain morphology findings across children with quite varied reading disability profiles that we hypothesize compound the developmental difficulties of children with unique reading disability profiles and reasons for their reading disability.