1
|
Sarmoko S, Novitasari D, Toriyama M, Fareza MS, Choironi NA, Itoh H, Meiyanto E. Different Modes of Mechanism of Gamma-Mangostin and Alpha-Mangostin to Inhibit Cell Migration of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells Concerning CXCR4 Downregulation and ROS Generation. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH : IJPR 2023; 22:e138856. [PMID: 38655233 PMCID: PMC11036650 DOI: 10.5812/ijpr-138856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/10/2023] [Indexed: 04/26/2024]
Abstract
Background Two mangostin compounds, gamma-mangostin and alpha-mangostin, show anticancer properties through the inhibition of cell proliferation and cell migration. Metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cells, including MDA-MB-231, highly express C-X-C chemokine receptor type 4 (CXCR4) to maintain reactive oxygen species (ROS) and cell migration. Objectives This study was performed to analyze and compare different modes of action of γ-mangostin and α-mangostin as antimigratory effects targeted on CXCR4 in MDA-MB-231 as a model of TNBC cell. Methods This study investigated the effect of γ-mangostin and α-mangostin using a series of assays, including Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay for cytotoxicity, wound healing assay for migration study, quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) for gene expression analysis, and flow cytometry for ROS measurement, along with in silico study to observe the binding between the compound and CXCR4. Results The findings revealed half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of 25 and 20 μM for γ-mangostin and α-mangostin in MDA-MB 231 cells, respectively. Moreover, a concentration of 10 μM was used for the migration assay. Both γ-mangostin and α-mangostin significantly suppressed cell migration within 24 hours. The present gene expression studies revealed the downregulation of key migration-associated genes, namely Farp, CXCR4, and LPHN2, upon γ-mangostin treatment but not α-mangostin. Additionally, both γ-mangostin and α-mangostin increased cellular ROS generation, highlighting the same effect of γ-mangostin and α-mangostin ROS elevation to inhibit cancer cell migration. Molecular docking simulations further suggested a potential interaction between γ-mangostin and α-mangostin with CXCR4 in high affinity. Conclusions These findings suggest that both γ-mangostin and α-mangostin inhibit breast cancer cell migration and induce cellular ROS levels in MDA-MB-231 cells; notably, γ-mangostin suppresses CXCR4 mRNA expression that might correlate to its activity to inhibit MDA-MB-231 cell migration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarmoko Sarmoko
- Department of Pharmacy, Sumatera Institute of Technology, Lampung, Indonesia
| | - Dhania Novitasari
- Cancer Chemoprevention Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
- Laboratory of Tumor Cell Biology, Division of Biological Science, Graduate School of Science and Technology, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Japan
| | - Manami Toriyama
- Laboratory of Molecular Signal Transduction, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Japan
- Laboratory of Advanced Cosmetic Science, Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Science, Osaka University, Japan
| | | | | | - Hiroshi Itoh
- Laboratory of Molecular Signal Transduction, Nara Institute of Science and Technology, Japan
| | - Edy Meiyanto
- Cancer Chemoprevention Research Center, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li N, Hou X, Huang S, Tai R, Lei L, Li S, Abuliz A, Wang G, Yang S. Biomarkers related to immune checkpoint inhibitors therapy. Biomed Pharmacother 2022; 147:112470. [PMID: 35074251 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.112470] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2021] [Revised: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 11/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy is an emerging cancer treatment. During treatment it is necessary to monitor the patient at all times and respond to any adverse reactions that may occur, such as immune-related adverse events and unconventional reactions. Biomarkers, the biochemical indicators that mark changes in the structure or function of systems, organs, tissues, and cells, may be used to predict and design treatment for such reactions. Anti-tumor immunotherapy biomarkers can be derived from the tumors themselves (e.g. negative regulatory molecules and dynamic changes in genome sequence) or from the immune system (e.g. peripheral blood cell population counts, various cytokines, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, and intestinal microbes). The development of biomarkers is important for monitoring the effect of treatment, assessing the patient's response to ICIs, determining adverse reactions, and predicting the direction of disease development. In addition, organ toxicity and systemic events also have an impact on the therapeutic effect of ICIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Na Li
- School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Zhejiang 315211, China; Department of Histology and Embryology, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang 150081, China
| | - Xin Hou
- School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Zhejiang 315211, China
| | - Shaogang Huang
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang 150081, China
| | - Risheng Tai
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang 150081, China
| | - Lei Lei
- Department of Histology and Embryology, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang 150081, China; Key Laboratory of Preservation of Human Genetic Resources and Disease Control in China, Harbin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Heilongjiang 150081, China
| | - Siyu Li
- School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Zhejiang 315211, China
| | - Adina Abuliz
- School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Zhejiang 315211, China
| | - Geng Wang
- School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Zhejiang 315211, China.
| | - Shanru Yang
- School of Medicine, Ningbo University, Zhejiang 315211, China; Department of Histology and Embryology, Harbin Medical University, Heilongjiang 150081, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kostine M, Finckh A, Bingham CO, Visser K, Leipe J, Schulze-Koops H, Choy EH, Benesova K, Radstake TRDJ, Cope AP, Lambotte O, Gottenberg JE, Allenbach Y, Visser M, Rusthoven C, Thomasen L, Jamal S, Marabelle A, Larkin J, Haanen JBAG, Calabrese LH, Mariette X, Schaeverbeke T. EULAR points to consider for the diagnosis and management of rheumatic immune-related adverse events due to cancer immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors. Ann Rheum Dis 2020; 80:36-48. [PMID: 32327425 PMCID: PMC7788064 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-217139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 139] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2020] [Revised: 04/03/2020] [Accepted: 04/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Rheumatic and musculoskeletal immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are observed in about 10% of patients with cancer receiving checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs). Given the recent emergence of these events and the lack of guidance for rheumatologists addressing them, a European League Against Rheumatism task force was convened to harmonise expert opinion regarding their identification and management. Methods First, the group formulated research questions for a systematic literature review. Then, based on literature and using a consensus procedure, 4 overarching principles and 10 points to consider were developed. Results The overarching principles defined the role of rheumatologists in the management of irAEs, highlighting the shared decision-making process between patients, oncologists and rheumatologists. The points to consider inform rheumatologists on the wide spectrum of musculoskeletal irAEs, not fulfilling usual classification criteria of rheumatic diseases, and their differential diagnoses. Early referral and facilitated access to rheumatologist are recommended, to document the target organ inflammation. Regarding therapeutic, three treatment escalations were defined: (1) local/systemic glucocorticoids if symptoms are not controlled by symptomatic treatment, then tapered to the lowest efficient dose, (2) conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, in case of inadequate response to glucocorticoids or for steroid sparing and (3) biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs, for severe or refractory irAEs. A warning has been made on severe myositis, a life-threatening situation, requiring high dose of glucocorticoids and close monitoring. For patients with pre-existing rheumatic disease, baseline immunosuppressive regimen should be kept at the lowest efficient dose before starting immunotherapies. Conclusion These statements provide guidance on diagnosis and management of rheumatic irAEs and aim to support future international collaborations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Kostine
- Rheumatology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Axel Finckh
- Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | | | - Karen Visser
- Rheumatology, Haga Hospital, Den Haag, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Leipe
- Department of Medicine V, Division of Rheumatology, University Hospital Centre, Mannheim, Germany.,Department of Internal Medicine IV, Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Hendrik Schulze-Koops
- Department of Internal Medicine IV, Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Ernest H Choy
- Institute of Infection and Immunity, Cardiff University School of Medicine, Cardiff, UK
| | | | | | - Andrew P Cope
- Academic Department of Rheumatology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Olivier Lambotte
- Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Hopital Bicetre, Le Kremlin-Bicetre, France
| | | | - Yves Allenbach
- Internal Medicine and Clinical Immunology, Sorbonne Université, Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Marianne Visser
- EULAR PARE Patient Research Partners, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cindy Rusthoven
- EULAR PARE Patient Research Partners, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Shahin Jamal
- Rheumatology, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | - James Larkin
- Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - John B A G Haanen
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
| | | | - Xavier Mariette
- Rheumatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux universitaires Paris-Sud - Hôpital Bicêtre, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.,3Université Paris-Sud, Center for Immunology of Viral Infections and Auto-immune Diseases (IMVA), Institut pour la Santé et la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) UMR 1184, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kostine M, Truchetet ME, Schaeverbeke T. Clinical characteristics of rheumatic syndromes associated with checkpoint inhibitors therapy. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2020; 58:vii68-vii74. [PMID: 31816082 PMCID: PMC6900916 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Revised: 05/31/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Compared with conventional cancer therapies, the spectrum of toxicities observed with checkpoint inhibitors is unique and can affect any organ system. Arthralgia and myalgia were by far the most commonly reported rheumatic immune-related adverse events in clinical trials, and there is now a growing number of case series and reports describing clinical features of de novo rheumatic immune-related adverse events, which will be the focus of this review. Some patients develop genuine classic rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases, but a number of rheumatic immune-related adverse events mimic rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases with atypical features, mainly polymyalgia rheumatica, rheumatoid arthritis and myositis, as well as several systemic conditions, including sicca syndrome, vasculitis, sarcoidosis, systemic sclerosis and lupus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marie Kostine
- Department of Rheumatology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Moving towards personalized treatments of immune-related adverse events. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2020; 17:504-515. [DOI: 10.1038/s41571-020-0352-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 116] [Impact Index Per Article: 29.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
6
|
Abdel-Wahab N, Suarez-Almazor ME. Frequency and distribution of various rheumatic disorders associated with checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2019; 58:vii40-vii48. [PMID: 31816084 PMCID: PMC6900912 DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/kez297] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2019] [Revised: 06/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors have advanced the treatment paradigm of various cancers, achieving remarkable survival benefits. However, a myriad of immune-related adverse events (irAE) has been recognized in almost every organ system, presumably because of persistent immune system activation. Rheumatic symptoms such as arthralgia or myalgia are very common. More specific irAE are increasingly being reported. The most frequent ones are inflammatory arthritis, polymyalgia-like syndromes, myositis and sicca manifestations. These rheumatic irAE can develop in ∼5-10% of patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors, although true incidence rates cannot be estimated given the lack of prospective cohort studies, and likely underreporting of rheumatic irAE in oncology trials. In this review, we will provide a summary of the epidemiologic data reported for these rheumatic irAE, until more robust prospective longitudinal studies become available to further define the true incidence rate of rheumatic irAE in patients receiving these novel cancer therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noha Abdel-Wahab
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Section of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Assiut University Hospitals, Assiut, Egypt
| | - Maria E Suarez-Almazor
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Section of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Monsour EP, Pothen J, Balaraman R. A Novel Approach to the Treatment of Pembrolizumab-induced Psoriasis Exacerbation: A Case Report. Cureus 2019; 11:e5824. [PMID: 31754559 PMCID: PMC6827694 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.5824] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
While immune checkpoint inhibitors have been groundbreaking for cancer treatment, there are many reported cases of patients undergoing immunotherapy who have discontinued or temporarily interrupted treatment due to the development of autoimmune-related adverse effects. Here, we present a 63-year-old female with a history of psoriasis (in spontaneous remission) and newly diagnosed poorly differentiated lung adenocarcinoma (pTXN3M1a) who experienced a severe flare-up of her psoriasis three months after initiating single-agent pembrolizumab. The patient was initially treated with topical clobetasol propionate ointment, however, due to minimal response to this regimen, the patient was commenced on secukinumab; an IL-17 inhibitor. To our knowledge, this is the first case of the successful use of secukinumab for the treatment of immunotherapy-induced psoriasis. More importantly, immunotherapy with pembrolizumab was continued successfully with the co-administration of secukinumab without complications or the recurrence of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elio P Monsour
- Internal Medicine, University of Central Florida / Ocala Regional Medical Center, Ocala, USA
| | - Joshua Pothen
- Internal Medicine, General Medical Education, Ocala Regional Medical Center, Ocala, USA
| | - Rama Balaraman
- Hematology and Oncology, Florida Cancer Affiliates / Ocala Oncology, Ocala, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
|