Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Quantitative Differentiation of Breast Tumors: A Meta-Analysis

Quantitative characterization of breast lesions and normal fibroglandular tissue using compartmentalized diffusion-weighted model: comparison of intravoxel incoherent motion and restriction spectrum imaging

BACKGROUND

To compare the compartmentalized diffusion-weighted models, intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and restriction spectrum imaging (RSI), in characterizing breast lesions and normal fibroglandular tissue.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled 152 patients with 157 histopathologically verified breast lesions (41 benign and 116 malignant). All patients underwent a full-protocol preoperative breast MRI, including a multi-b-value DWI sequence. The diffusion parameters derived from the mono-exponential model (ADC), IVIM model (Dt, Dp, f), and RSI model (C1, C2, C3, C1C2, F1, F2, F3, F1F2) were quantitatively measured and then compared among malignant lesions, benign lesions and normal fibroglandular tissues using Kruskal-Wallis test. The Mann-Whitney U-test was used for the pairwise comparisons. Diagnostic models were built by logistic regression analysis. The ROC analysis was performed using five-fold cross-validation and the mean AUC values were calculated and compared to evaluate the discriminative ability of each parameter or model.

RESULTS

Almost all quantitative diffusion parameters showed significant differences in distinguishing malignant breast lesions from both benign lesions (other than C2) and normal fibroglandular tissue (all parameters) (all P < 0.0167). In terms of the comparisons of benign lesions and normal fibroglandular tissues, the parameters derived from IVIM (Dp, f) and RSI (C1, C2, C1C2, F1, F2, F3) showed significant differences (all P < 0.005). When using individual parameters, RSI-derived parameters-F1, C1C2, and C2 values yielded the highest AUCs for the comparisons of malignant vs. benign, malignant vs. normal tissue and benign vs. normal tissue (AUCs = 0.871, 0.982, and 0.863, respectively). Furthermore, the combined diagnostic model (IVIM + RSI) exhibited the highest diagnostic efficacy for the pairwise discriminations (AUCs = 0.893, 0.991, and 0.928, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative parameters derived from the three-compartment RSI model have great promise as imaging indicators for the differential diagnosis of breast lesions compared with the bi-exponential IVIM model. Additionally, the combined model of IVIM and RSI achieves superior diagnostic performance in characterizing breast lesions.

Multiparametric Approach to Breast Cancer With Emphasis on Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Era of Personalized Breast Cancer Treatment

ABSTRACT

A multiparametric approach to breast cancer imaging offers the advantage of integrating the diverse contributions of various parameters. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) is the most important MRI sequence for breast imaging. The vascularity and permeability of lesions can be estimated through the use of semiquantitative and quantitative parameters. The increased use of ultrafast DCE-MRI has facilitated the introduction of novel kinetic parameters. In addition to DCE-MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging provides information associated with tumor cell density, with advanced diffusion-weighted imaging techniques such as intravoxel incoherent motion, diffusion kurtosis imaging, and time-dependent diffusion MRI opening up new horizons in microscale tissue evaluation. Furthermore, T2-weighted imaging plays a key role in measuring the degree of tumor aggressiveness, which may be related to the tumor microenvironment. Magnetic resonance imaging is, however, not the only imaging modality providing semiquantitative and quantitative parameters from breast tumors. Breast positron emission tomography demonstrates superior spatial resolution to whole-body positron emission tomography and allows comparable delineation of breast cancer to MRI, as well as providing metabolic information, which often precedes vascular and morphological changes occurring in response to treatment. The integration of these imaging-derived factors is accomplished through multiparametric imaging. In this article, we explore the relationship among the key imaging parameters, breast cancer diagnosis, and histological characteristics, providing a technical and theoretical background for these parameters. Furthermore, we review the recent studies on the application of multiparametric imaging to breast cancer and the significance of the key imaging parameters.

Breast DWI Analyzed Before and After Gadolinium Contrast Administration-An Intrapatient Analysis on 1.5 T and 3.0 T

OBJECTIVES

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is gaining popularity as an addition to standard dynamic contrast-enhanced breast MRI. Although adding diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) to the standard protocol design would require increased scanning-time, implementation during the contrast-enhanced phase could offer a multiparametric MRI protocol without any additional scanning time. However, gadolinium within a region of interest (ROI) might affect assessments of DWI. This study aims to determine if acquiring DWI postcontrast, incorporated in an abbreviated MRI protocol, would statistically significantly affect lesion classification. In addition, the effect of postcontrast DWI on breast parenchyma was studied.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Screening or preoperative MRIs (1.5 T/3 T) were included for this study. Diffusion-weighted imaging was acquired with single-shot spin echo-echo planar imaging before and at approximately 2 minutes after gadoterate meglumine injection. Apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) based on 2-dimensional ROIs of fibroglandular tissue, as well as benign and malignant lesions at 1.5 T/3.0 T, were compared with a Wilcoxon signed rank test. Diffusivity levels were compared between precontrast and postcontrast DWI with weighted κ. An overall P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

No significant changes were observed in ADC mean after contrast administration in 21 patients with 37 ROI of healthy fibroglandular tissue and in the 93 patients with 93 (malignant and benign) lesions. This effect remained after stratification on B 0 . In 18% of all lesions, a diffusion level shift was observed, with an overall weighted κ of 0.75.

CONCLUSIONS

This study supports incorporating DWI at 2 minutes postcontrast when ADC is calculated based on b150-b800 with 15 mL 0.5 M gadoterate meglumine in an abbreviated multiparametric MRI protocol without requiring extra scan time.

Three-compartment spectral diffusion analysis for breast cancer magnetic resonance imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To examine the diagnostic performance of a three-compartment diffusion model with the fixed cut-off diffusion coefficient (D) using magnetic resonance spectral diffusion analysis for differentiating between invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and compare the conventional apparent D (ADC), and mean kurtosis (MK), with the tissue D (DIVIM), perfusion D (D*IVIM), and perfusion fraction (fIVIM) calculated by conventional intravoxel incoherent motion.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included women who underwent breast MRI with eight b-value diffusion-weighted imaging between February 2019 and March 2022. Spectral diffusion analysis was performed; very-slow, cellular, and perfusion compartments were defined using cut-off Ds of 0.1 × 10-3 and 3.0 × 10-3 mm2/s (static water D). The mean D (Ds, Dc, Dp, respectively) and fraction F (Fs, Fc, Fp, respectively) for each compartment were calculated. ADC and MK values were also calculated; receiver operating characteristic analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Histologically confirmed 132 ICD and 62 DCIS (age range 31-87 [53 ± 11] years) were evaluated. The areas under the curve (AUCs) for ADC, MK, DIVIM, D*IVIM, fIVIM, Ds, Dc, Dp, Fs, Fc, and Fp were 0.77, 0.72, 0.77, 0.51, 0.67, 0.54, 0.78, 0.51, 0.57, 0.54, and 0.57, respectively. The AUCs for the model combining very-slow and cellular compartments and the model combining the three compartments were 0.81 each, slightly and significantly higher than for ADC, DIVIM, and Dc (P = 0.09-0.14); and MK (P < 0.05), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Three-compartment model analysis using the diffusion spectrum accurately differentiated IDC from DCIS; however, it was not superior to ADC and DIVIM. The diagnostic performance of MK was lower than that of the three-compartment model.

Diagnostic accuracy of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI to differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can reduce the need for unnecessary invasive diagnostic tests by nearly half. In this meta-analysis, we investigated the diagnostic accuracy of intravoxel incoherent motion modeling (IVIM) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions.

METHOD

We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and Scopus. We included English articles reporting diagnostic accuracy for both sequences in differentiating benign from malignant breast lesions. Articles were assessed by quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies-2 (QUADAS-2) questionnaire. We used a bivariate effects model for standardized mean difference (SMD) analysis and diagnostic test accuracy analysis.

RESULTS

Ten studies with 537 patients and 707 (435 malignant and 272 benign) lesions were included. The D, f, Ktrans, and Kep mean values significantly differ between benign and malignant lesions. The pooled sensitivity (95 % confidence interval) and specificity were 86.2 % (77.9 %-91.7 %) and 70.3 % (56.5 %-81.1 %) for IVIM, and 93.8 % (85.3 %-97.5 %) and 68.1 % (52.7 %-80.4 %) for DCE, respectively. Combined IVIM and DCE depicted the highest area under the curve of 0.94, with a sensitivity and specificity of 91.8 % (82.8 %-96.3 %) and 87.6 % (73.8 %-94.7 %), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined IVIM and DCE had the highest diagnostic accuracy, and multiparametric MRI may help reduce unnecessary benign breast biopsy.

Application of advanced diffusion models from diffusion weighted imaging in a large cohort study of breast lesions

BACKGROUND

To evaluate multiple parameters in multiple b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in characterizing breast lesions and predicting prognostic factors and molecular subtypes.

METHODS

In total, 504 patients who underwent 3-T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) sequences, T2-weighted sequences and multiple b-value (7 values, from 0 to 3000 s/mm²) DWI were recruited. The average values of 13 parameters in 6 models were calculated and recorded. The pathological diagnosis of breast lesions was based on the latest World Health Organization (WHO) classification.

RESULTS

Twelve parameters exhibited statistical significance in differentiating benign and malignant lesions. alpha demonstrated the highest sensitivity (89.5%), while sigma demonstrated the highest specificity (77.7%). The stretched-exponential model (SEM) demonstrated the highest sensitivity (90.8%), while the biexponential model demonstrated the highest specificity (80.8%). The highest AUC (0.882, 95% CI, 0.852-0.912) was achieved when all 13 parameters were combined. Prognostic factors were correlated with different parameters, but the correlation was relatively weak. Among the 6 parameters with significant differences among molecular subtypes of breast cancer, the Luminal A group and Luminal B (HER2 negative) group had relatively low values, and the HER2-enriched group and TNBC group had relatively high values.

CONCLUSIONS

All 13 parameters, independent or combined, provide valuable information in distinguishing malignant from benign breast lesions. These new parameters have limited meaning for predicting prognostic factors and molecular subtypes of malignant breast tumors.

A review of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR imaging for breast cancer: Towards noninvasive biomarker

Quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is an important adjunct to conventional breast MRI and shows promise as a noninvasive biomarker of breast cancer in multiple clinical scenarios, from the discrimination of benign and malignant lesions, prediction, and evaluation of treatment response to a prognostic assessment of breast cancer. Various quantitative parameters are derived from different DWI models based on special prior knowledge and assumptions, have different meanings, and are easy to confuse. In this review, we describe the quantitative parameters derived from conventional and advanced DWI models commonly used in breast cancer and summarize the promising clinical applications of these quantitative parameters. Although promising, it is still challenging for these quantitative parameters to become clinically useful noninvasive biomarkers in breast cancer, as multiple factors may result in variations in quantitative parameter measurements. Finally, we briefly describe some considerations regarding the factors that cause variations.

Diffusion kurtosis imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion imaging parameters in breast lesions: Effect of radiologists' experience and region-of-interest selection

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of ROI placement methods and radiologists' experience on diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) and intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) parameters' diagnostic performance in differentiating benign and malignant lesions based on the mass and non-mass enhancement (NME).

METHODS

We evaluated 138 lesions in 131 patients retrospectively. The IVIM and DKI parameter values were measured by three radiologists with different experiences independently using two different ROI placement methods. IVIM parameters include diffusion coefficient (ADCstand), true diffusion coefficient (ADCslow), pseudo-diffusion coefficient (ADCfast) and perfusion fraction (f). DKI parameters include mean diffusivity (MD) and mean kurtosis (MK). Each radiologist measured the lesions twice with a 3-month interval. We utilized intra-class correlation (ICC) to determine the inter- and intra-reader agreement for mass and NME, respectively. ROC analysis compared the diagnostic performance of parameters between different radiologists, ROI methods, and between mass and NME.

RESULTS

In mass lesions, inter- and intra-observer agreement were perfect for all parameters (ICC: 0.800-989). In NME, the inter-observer agreement was substantial to perfect for all parameters(ICC: 0.703-877), the intra-observer agreement of the senior and intermediate radiologists was substantial to perfect(ICC: 0.748-931) and the intra-observer agreement of the junior radiologist was moderate to substantial(ICC: 0.569-784). The diagnostic performance of ADCslow (Z = 2.209, P = 0.023), MD (mean diffusivity) (Z = 2.887, P = 0.004), and MK (mean kurtosis) (Z = 2.080, P = 0.038) in the small ROI measured by the senior radiologist was better than that of the junior radiologist for NME. The diagnostic performance of ADCslow in the large ROI measured by the senior radiologist (Z = 2.281, P = 0.023) and intermediate radiologist (Z = 2.867, P = 0.0041) was better than the junior radiologist for mass lesions. The diagnostic performance of ADCslow, ADCstand, MD, and MK did not show a significant difference between the two ROI placement methods (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The observers' experience can influence the ROI selection and the diagnostic performance of ADCslow, ADCstand, MD, and MK measured using different methods show equal diagnostic performance.

The road to breast cancer screening with diffusion MRI

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer in women with a huge medical, social and economic impact. Mammography (MMG) has been the gold standard method until now because it is relatively inexpensive and widely available. However, MMG suffers from certain limitations, such as exposure to X-rays and difficulty of interpretation in dense breasts. Among other imaging methods, MRI has clearly the highest sensitivity and specificity, and breast MRI is the gold standard for the investigation and management of suspicious lesions revealed by MMG. Despite this performance, MRI, which does not rely on X-rays, is not used for screening except for a well-defined category of women at risk, because of its high cost and limited availability. In addition, the standard approach to breast MRI relies on Dynamic Contrast Enhanced (DCE) MRI with the injection of Gadolinium based contrast agents (GBCA), which have their own contraindications and can lead to deposit of gadolinium in tissues, including the brain, when examinations are repeated. On the other hand, diffusion MRI of breast, which provides information on tissue microstructure and tumor perfusion without the use of contrast agents, has been shown to offer higher specificity than DCE MRI with similar sensitivity, superior to MMG. Diffusion MRI thus appears to be a promising alternative approach to breast cancer screening, with the primary goal of eliminating with a very high probability the existence of a life-threatening lesion. To achieve this goal, it is first necessary to standardize the protocols for acquisition and analysis of diffusion MRI data, which have been found to vary largely in the literature. Second, the accessibility and cost-effectiveness of MRI examinations must be significantly improved, which may become possible with the development of dedicated low-field MRI units for breast cancer screening. In this article, we will first review the principles and current status of diffusion MRI, comparing its clinical performance with MMG and DCE MRI. We will then look at how breast diffusion MRI could be implemented and standardized to optimize accuracy of results. Finally, we will discuss how a dedicated, low-cost prototype of breast MRI system could be implemented and introduced to the healthcare market.

Application of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion in the Evaluation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma after Transarterial Chemoembolization

(1) Background: To assess the efficacy of the quantitative parameters of intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis after transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). (2) Methods: Fifty HCC patients after TACE were included and underwent MRI. All of the patients were scanned with the IVIM-DWI sequence and underwent TACE retreatment within 1 week. Referring to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and MR enhanced images, two readers measured the f, D, and D* values of the tumor active area (TAA), tumor necrotic area (TNA), and adjacent normal hepatic parenchyma (ANHP). Then, the distinctions of the TAA, TNA, and ANHP were compared and we analyzed the differential diagnosis of the parameters in three tissues. (3) Results: For values of f and D, there were significant differences between any of the TAA, TNA, and ANHP (p < 0.05). The values of f and D were the best indicators for identifying the TAA and TNA, with AUC values of 0.959 and 0.955, respectively. The values of f and D performed well for distinguishing TAA from ANHP, with AUC values of 0.835 and 0.753, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Quantitative IVIM-DWI was effective for evaluating tumor viability in HCC patients treated with TACE and may be helpful for non-invasive monitoring of the tumor viability.

Identification of the Benignity and Malignancy of BI-RADS 4 Breast Lesions Based on a Combined Quantitative Model of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Intravoxel Incoherent Motion

The aim of this study was to explore whether intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) combined with a dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) quantitative model can improve the ability to distinguish between benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 breast lesions. We enrolled 100 patients who underwent breast MRI at our institution and extracted the quantitative parameters of lesions with a post-processing workstation. Statistical differences in these parameters between benign and malignant BI-RADS 4 lesions were assessed using a two independent samples t-test or a Mann-Whitney U test. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to establish five diagnostic models (model_{_ADC}, model_{_IVIM}, model_{_DCE}, model_{_DCE+ADC}, and model_{_DCE+IVIM}). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, leave-one-out cross-validation, and the Delong test were used to assess and compare the diagnostic performance of these models. The model_{_DCE+IVIM} showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) of 0.903 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.828-0.953, sensitivity: 87.50%, specificity: 85.00%), which was significantly higher than that of model_{_ADC} (p = 0.014) and model_{_IVIM} (p = 0.033). The model_{_ADC} had the lowest diagnostic performance (AUC = 0.768, 95%CI: 0.672-0.846) but was not significantly different from model_{_IVIM} (p = 0.168). The united quantitative model with DCE-MRI and IVIM could improve the ability to evaluate the malignancy in BI-RADS 4 lesions, and unnecessary breast biopsies may be obviated.

Simplified intravoxel incoherent motion DWI for differentiating malignant from benign breast lesions

Background

To evaluate simplified intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for differentiating malignant versus benign breast lesions as (i) stand-alone tool and (ii) add-on to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.

Methods

1.5-T DWI data (b = 0, 50, 250, 800 s/mm²) were retrospectively analysed for 126 patients with malignant or benign breast lesions. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ADC (0, 800) and IVIM-based parameters D₁′ = ADC (50, 800), D₂′ = ADC (250, 800), f₁′ = f (0, 50, 800), f₂′ = f (0, 250, 800) and D*′ = D* (0, 50, 250, 800) were voxel-wise calculated without fitting procedures. Regions of interest were analysed in vital tumour and perfusion hot spots. Beside the single parameters, the combined use of D₁′ with f₁′ and D₂′ with f₂′ was evaluated. Lesion differentiation was investigated for lesions (i) with hyperintensity on DWI with b = 800 s/mm² (n = 191) and (ii) with suspicious contrast-enhancement (n = 135).

Results

All lesions with suspicious contrast-enhancement appeared also hyperintense on DWI with b = 800 s/mm². For task (i), best discrimination was reached for the combination of D₁′ and f₁′ using perfusion hot spot regions-of-interest (accuracy 93.7%), which was higher than that of ADC (86.9%, p = 0.003) and single IVIM parameters D₁′ (88.0%) and f₁′ (87.4%). For task (ii), best discrimination was reached for single parameter D₁′ using perfusion hot spot regions-of-interest (92.6%), which were slightly but not significantly better than that of ADC (91.1%) and D₂′ (88.1%). Adding f₁′ to D₁′ did not improve discrimination.

Conclusions

IVIM analysis yielded a higher accuracy than ADC. If stand-alone DWI is used, perfusion analysis is of special relevance.

DWI of the Breast - Possibilities and Limitations

BACKGROUND

 The MRI of the breast is of great importance in the diagnosis of disorders of the breast. This can be stated for the primary diagnosis as well as the follow up. Of special interest is diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), which has an increasingly important role. The present review provides results regarding the diagnostic and prognostic relevance of DWI for disorders of the breast.

METHODS

 Under consideration of the recently published literature, the clinical value of DWI of the breast is discussed. Several diagnostic applications are shown, especially for the primary diagnosis of unclear tumors of the breast, the prediction of the axillary lymph node status and the possibility of a native screening. Moreover, correlations between DWI and histopathology features and treatment prediction with DWI are provided.

RESULTS

 Many studies have shown the diagnostic value of DWI for the primary diagnosis of intramammary lesions. Benign lesions of the breast have significantly higher apparent diffusion coefficients (ADC values) compared to malignant tumors. This can be clinically used to reduce unnecessary biopsies in clinical routine. However, there are inconclusive results for the prediction of the histological subtype of the breast cancer. DWI can aid in the prediction of treatment to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

 DWI is a very promising imaging modality, which should be included in the standard protocol of the MRI of the breast. DWI can provide clinically value in the diagnosis as well as for prognosis in breast cancer.

KEY POINTS

  · DWI can aid in the discrimination between benign and malignant tumors of the breast and therefore avoiding unnecessary biopsies.. · The ADC value cannot discriminate between immunhistochemical subtypes of the breast cancer. · The ADC value of breast cancer increases under neoadjuvant chemotherapy and can by this aid in treatment prediction.. · There is definite need of standardisation for clinical translation.

CITATION FORMAT

· Meyer HJ, Martin M, Denecke T. DWI of the Breast - Possibilities and Limitations. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2022; DOI: 10.1055/a-1775-8572.

Synthesizing the First Phase of Dynamic Sequences of Breast MRI for Enhanced Lesion Identification

Objective

To develop a deep learning model for synthesizing the first phases of dynamic (FP-Dyn) sequences to supplement the lack of information in unenhanced breast MRI examinations.

Methods

In total, 97 patients with breast MRI images were collected as the training set (n = 45), the validation set (n = 31), and the test set (n = 21), respectively. An enhance border lifelike synthesize (EDLS) model was developed in the training set and used to synthesize the FP-Dyn images from the T1WI images in the validation set. The peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity (SSIM), mean square error (MSE) and mean absolute error (MAE) of the synthesized images were measured. Moreover, three radiologists subjectively assessed image quality, respectively. The diagnostic value of the synthesized FP-Dyn sequences was further evaluated in the test set.

Results

The image synthesis performance in the EDLS model was superior to that in conventional models from the results of PSNR, SSIM, MSE, and MAE. Subjective results displayed a remarkable visual consistency between the synthesized and original FP-Dyn images. Moreover, by using a combination of synthesized FP-Dyn sequence and an unenhanced protocol, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of MRI were 100%, 72.73%, 76.92%, and 100%, respectively, which had a similar diagnostic value to full MRI protocols.

Conclusions

The EDLS model could synthesize the realistic FP-Dyn sequence to supplement the lack of enhanced images. Compared with full MRI examinations, it thus provides a new approach for reducing examination time and cost, and avoids the use of contrast agents without influencing diagnostic accuracy.

Application of Diffusion Weighted Imaging Techniques for Differentiating Benign and Malignant Breast Lesions

To explore the value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM), and diffusional kurtosis imaging (DKI) based on diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions. A total of 215 patients with breast lesions were prospectively collected for breast MR examination. Single exponential, IVIM, and DKI models were calculated using a series of b values. Parameters including ADC, perfusion fraction (f), tissue diffusion coefficient (D), perfusion-related incoherent microcirculation (D*), average kurtosis (MK), and average diffusivity (MD) were compared between benign and malignant lesions. ROC curves were used to analyze the optimal diagnostic threshold of each parameter, and to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of single and combined parameters. ADC, D, MK, and MD values were significantly different between benign and malignant breast lesions (P<0.001). Among the single parameters, ADC had the highest diagnostic efficiency (sensitivity 91.45%, specificity 82.54%, accuracy 88.84%, AUC 0.915) and the best diagnostic threshold (0.983 μm²/ms). The combination of ADC and MK offered high diagnostic performance (sensitivity 90.79%, specificity 85.71%, accuracy 89.30%, AUC 0.923), but no statistically significant difference in diagnostic performance as compared with single-parameter ADC (P=0.268). The ADC, D, MK, and MD parameters have high diagnostic value in differentiating benign and malignant breast lesions, and of these individual parameters the ADC has the best diagnostic performance. Therefore, our study revealed that the use of ADC alone should be useful for differentiating between benign and malignant breast lesions, whereas the combination of MK and ADC might improve the diagnostic performance to some extent.