Consolidation Immunotherapy After Platinum-Based Chemoradiotherapy in Patients With Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer-Cross-Sectional Study of Eligibility and Administration Rates

Asian Thoracic Oncology Research Group expert consensus statement on the peri-operative management of non-small cell lung cancer

The peri-operative management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in earlier stage disease has seen significant advances in recent years with the incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy. However, many unanswered questions and challenges remain, including the application of clinical trial data to routine clinical practice. Recognising the unique demographic profile of Asian patients with NSCLC and heterogeneous healthcare systems, the Asian Thoracic Oncology Research Group (ATORG) convened a consensus meeting in Singapore on 26 April 2024 to discuss relevant issues spanning diagnostic testing to post-neoadjuvant treatment considerations and future directions. An interdisciplinary group of 19 experts comprising medical oncologists, thoracic surgeons, radiation oncologists, pulmonologists and pathologists from Singapore, Hong Kong, Mainland China, Korea, Japan, Taiwan, India, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam and Australia met to discuss emerging data, identify existing gaps in clinical care and develop a multidisciplinary, multinational expert consensus statement on the peri-operative management of NSCLC tailored to the Asia-Pacific region.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibition combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with stage III unresectable non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In patients with unresectable, stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), durvalumab maintenance after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) was shown to improve survival over placebo. As subgroup analyses indicated better outcomes with earlier start of durvalumab, several trials evaluated concomitant checkpoint inhibition (CPI) with cCRT. However, this may introduce an increased risk of treatment-related pulmonary toxicity.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials of combined cCRT plus CPI followed by CPI maintenance in patients with stage III NSCLC. Endpoints included incidence of pneumonitis by any cause, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

A total of 7 trials comprising 653 patients were included. In trials of single-agent CPI with cCRT, pneumonitis occurred in 33 % of patients (95 % confidence interval [CI], 28-39) with 7 % (5-9) having CTCAE grade 3-5. In one trial, double CPI (PD-1 and CTLA4) plus cCRT was associated with excessive pneumonitis-related mortality of 16 % (4-40). Across all trials, ORR was 69 % (63-76). Median PFS and OS were 16.3 (95 % CI, 14.0-20.5) and 39.5 months (35.3-45.9), respectively. Three-year PFS and OS were 36.8 % (95 % CI, 32.7-41.4) and 53.1 % (49.1-57.4). Sensitivity analysis showed that induction chemoimmunotherapy prior cCRT plus CPI was associated with improved PFS of 48.0 % at 3 years (95 % CI, 40.7-56.7) in one trial.

DISCUSSION

Addition of single-agent CPI to cCRT is manageable in selected patients with stage III NSCLC. Efficacy outcomes appear to be in line with previous data of cCRT followed by CPI maintenance.

Radiomic and dosimetric parameter-based nomogram predicts radiation esophagitis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer undergoing combined immunotherapy and radiotherapy

Background

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and radiotherapy (RT) may increase the risk of radiation esophagitis (RE). This study aimed to establish and validate a new nomogram to predict RE in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing immunochemotherapy followed by RT (ICI-RT).

Methods

The 102 eligible patients with NSCLC treated with ICI-RT were divided into training (n = 71) and validation (n = 31) cohorts. Clinicopathologic features, dosimetric parameters, inflammatory markers, and radiomic score (Rad-score) were included in the univariate logistic regression analysis, and factors with p < 0.05 in the univariate analysis were included in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Factors with significant predictive values were obtained and used for developing the nomogram. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curve, and decision curve were used to validate the model.

Results

A total of 38 (37.3%) patients developed RE. Univariate and multivariate analyses identified the following independent predictors of RE: a maximum dose delivered to the esophagus >58.4 Gy, a mean esophagus dose >13.3 Gy, and the Rad-score. The AUCs of the nomogram in the training and validation cohorts were 0.918 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.824-1.000) and 0.833 (95% CI: 0.697-0.969), respectively, indicating good discrimination. The calibration curves showed good agreement between the predicted occurrence of RE and the actual observations. The decision curve showed a satisfactory positive net benefit at most threshold probabilities, suggesting a good clinical effect.

Conclusions

We developed and validated a nomogram based on imaging histological features and RT dosimetric parameters. This model can effectively predict the occurrence of RE in patients with NSCLC treated using ICI-RT.

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

In 2018, the treatment options for unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) changed with durvalumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), which was approved for consolidation therapy following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) without disease progression. Despite durvalumab's clinical benefit, many patients receiving this therapy developed progression. This study evaluated treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in real-world community oncology practices for patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who received cCRT.

METHODS

This study used The US Oncology Network's (iKnowMed) electronic health record database supplemented by chart review and included adults diagnosed with unresectable stage III NSCLC initiating cCRT between 11/01/2017 and 10/31/2019, with follow-up through 04/30/2022. cCRT included concurrent treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy (+/-14 days). Real-world overall survival (rwOS) and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) were estimated from cCRT initiation using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Among 426 patients, 61.5% received durvalumab post-cCRT (cCRT+durvalumab) and 38.5% did not (cCRT alone). Death (28.3%) and disease progression (22.2%) were the most common reasons for not initiating durvalumab. The median age for the cCRT+durvalumab and cCRT alone cohorts were 70 and 71 years, and 71.8% and 61.6% had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, respectively. 51.5% of cCRT+durvalumab discontinued durvalumab, primarily due to adverse events (35.8%) and disease progression (28.4%). Median rwOS was 50.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]:41.4, not reached) and 11.6 (95% CI:6.5,15.9) months for cCRT+durvalumab and cCRT alone, respectively. Median rwPFS was 28.5 (95% CI:23.3,36.4) months for cCRT+durvalumab and 6.3 (95% CI:4.3,9.3) months for cCRT alone, respectively. 23.7% (cCRT+durvalumab) and 26.2% (cCRT alone) received subsequent treatment, of which, 59.7% (cCRT+durvalumab) and 46.5% (cCRT alone) received ICI.

CONCLUSION

Four out of ten patients did not receive consolidation durvalumab mainly due to disease progression. Even among patients who initiated durvalumab, many patients relapsed and were retreated with ICIs. These findings underscore the need to refine treatment strategies for better outcomes in stage III unresectable NSCLC.

Dose-Volume Constraints Parameters for Lung Tissue in Thoracic Radiotherapy Following Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatment

Purpose

This study aims to identify risk factors associated with symptomatic radiation pneumonitis (RP, Grade ≥ 2) following immunotherapy preceding thoracic radiotherapy (ICI-TRT) and establish safe dose constraints.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective study enrolled patients diagnosed with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) following immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) treatment. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of symptomatic RP (Grade ≥ 2), as defined by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. Clinical and lung dosimetric parameters were analyzed to determine their associations with symptomatic RP. Dosimetric parameters included mean lung dose (MLD) and the percentage of lung volume receiving ≥10 Gy (V10), ≥20 Gy (V20), ≥30 Gy (V30), and ≥40 Gy (V40). Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to predict the risk of developing symptomatic RP to establish optimal threshold values for each dosimetric predictor.

Results

Among the 118 patients included, the incidence of symptomatic RP was 25.4%. Tumor locations, intervals between immunotherapy and radiotherapy, and MLD, V10, V20, V30, and V40 were identified as independent risk factors for symptomatic RP. The area under the curve (AUC) values for MLD, V10, V20, V30, and V40 were 0.788 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.704-0.873), 0.789 (95% CI 0.705-0.874), 0.791 (95% CI 0.706-0.876), 0.784 (95% CI 0.697-0.871), and 0.749 (95% CI 0.656-0.842), respectively. The optimal threshold values for MLD, V10, V20, V30, and V40 were 9.7 Gy, 26.3%, 15.9%, 13.3%, and 8.6%, respectively. These thresholds are lower than current guideline recommendations, and maintaining dosimetric parameters below these values resulted in a cumulative symptomatic RP incidence of <12%.

Conclusion

The recommended dose thresholds for MLD, V10, V20, V30, and V40 are lower than the current guidelines, underscoring the importance of radiotherapy planning to minimize symptomatic RP occurrence in patients receiving ICI-TRT.

Budget impact analysis of durvalumab consolidation therapy vs no consolidation therapy after chemoradiotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer in the context of the Chilean health care system

BACKGROUND

Durvalumab, used as consolidation immunotherapy, has shown to improve survival in patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer who respond to chemoradiotherapy, based on the most recent follow-up of PACIFIC. The Chilean healthcare system provides access to certain immunotherapies for this condition. The present study sought to estimate the budget impact of durvalumab versus standard of care in the context of the Chilean healthcare system.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A partitioned survival model was adapted to compare two strategies: durvalumab as consolidation therapy and standard of care for treating stage III NSCLC. The number of patients eligible for treatment was estimated using published incidence data and modeled for a 5-year time horizon. Model inputs were based on published literature, and the duration of treatment was estimated using survival curves obtained from PACIFIC. Costs were estimated in Chilean pesos (CLP) and converted to USD dollars using an exchange rate of USD 1  =  CLP 827. Scenario analyses were performed to assess different subsequent therapy splits, variations in the target population and dosage of durvalumab.

RESULTS

Durvalumab uptake projected total costs ranging from USD 1.27 in Year 1 to 8.5 million in Year 5 from the public perspective. From the private perspective, the budget impact for the first year is USD 1.3 million to USD 3 million for 2028. This difference relies mostly on the lower number of patients treated. Both perspectives anticipated cost savings over the time horizon through reduced monitoring, adverse events, and end-of-life expenses.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the inclusion of Durvalumab for NSCLC in Chile represents an investment in the Chilean health system. The incremental costs align with clinical benefits and potential savings in healthcare resource utilization. However, a comprehensive cost-effectiveness analysis is needed to evaluate its economic value thoroughly.

Neoadjuvant SHR-1701 with or without chemotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: A proof-of-concept, phase 2 trial

We conducted a proof-of-concept, phase 2 trial to assess neoadjuvant SHR-1701 with or without chemotherapy, followed by surgery or radiotherapy, and then consolidation SHR-1701 in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In the primary cohort of patients receiving neoadjuvant combination therapy (n = 97), both primary endpoints were met, with a post-induction objective response rate of 58% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47-68) and an 18-month event-free survival (EFS) rate of 56.6% (95% CI 45.2-66.5). Overall, 27 (25%) patients underwent surgery; all achieved R0 resection. Among them, 12 (44%) major pathological responses and seven (26%) pathological complete responses were recorded. The 18-month EFS rate was 74.1% (95% CI 53.2-86.7) in surgical patients and 57.3% (43.0-69.3) in radiotherapy-treated patients. Neoadjuvant SHR-1701 with chemotherapy, followed by surgery or radiotherapy, showed promising efficacy with a tolerable safety profile in unresectable stage III NSCLC. Surgical conversion was feasible in a notable proportion of patients and associated with better survival outcomes.

Durvalumab in combination with chemoradiotherapy for patients with unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: Results from the phase 1 CLOVER study

INTRODUCTION

For patients with unresectable, stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), current standard of care is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) followed by consolidation durvalumab. However, earlier initiation of durvalumab simultaneously with cCRT may increase antitumor activity relative to initiation after cCRT. The phase 1 CLOVER study (NCT03509012) evaluated durvalumab combined with cCRT in patients with advanced solid tumors; we report findings from the NSCLC cohort.

METHODS

CLOVER comprised a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) assessment part, followed by an expansion part. In the NSCLC cohort, patients with previously untreated, unresectable, stage III NSCLC were enrolled in three treatment arms: durvalumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) + cisplatin + etoposide + radiotherapy (Arm 1); durvalumab Q4W + carboplatin + paclitaxel + radiotherapy (Arm 2); or durvalumab Q4W + carboplatin or cisplatin + pemetrexed + radiotherapy (non-squamous histology only; Arm 3). Patients received durvalumab until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were enrolled: 21, 22, and 21 in Arms 1, 2, and 3, respectively. One patient in Arm 1 had DLT (grade 3 aspartate aminotransferase increase and grade 4 alanine aminotransferase increase); no DLTs were observed in Arms 2 or 3. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 76.6 % of patients overall; the most common were neutropenia (51.6 %), leukopenia (20.3 %), and anemia (17.2 %). In a post-hoc analysis, 7.8 % of patients had grade 3 pneumonitis/radiation pneumonitis (grouped term) events. Overall, the objective response rate was 60.9 % (95 % confidence interval [CI], 47.9-72.9); median duration of response was 15.8 months (95 % CI, 9.0-not estimable [NE]). Median progression-free survival was 13.4 months (95 % CI, 8.8-20.1) and median overall survival was not reached (95 % CI, 21.9-NE).

CONCLUSION

Durvalumab in combination with cCRT was well tolerated, with a manageable safety profile and showed encouraging antitumor activity in patients with unresectable, stage III NSCLC.

Induction immunochemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective cohort study

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of induction immunochemotherapy followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). We identified unresectable stage III NSCLC patients who received induction immunochemotherapy. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were the primary endpoints. From February 2019 to August 2022, 158 patients were enrolled. Following the completion of induction immunochemotherapy, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were 52.5% and 83.5%, respectively. The ORR of CRT was 73.5%, representing 68.4% of the total cohort. The median PFS was 17.8 months, and the median OS was 41.9 months, significantly higher than in patients who received CRT alone (p < 0.001). Patients with concurrent CRT demonstrated markedly improved PFS (p = 0.012) and OS (p = 0.017) than those undergoing sequential CRT. Additionally, those with a programmed-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression of 50% or higher showed significantly elevated ORRs (72.2% vs. 47.2%, p = 0.011) and superior OS (median 44.8 vs. 28.6 months, p = 0.004) compared to patients with PD-L1 expression below 50%. Hematologic toxicities were the primary severe adverse events (grade ≥ 3) encountered, with no unforeseen treatment-related toxicities. Thus, induction immunochemotherapy followed by definitive CRT demonstrated encouraging efficacy and tolerable toxicities for unresectable LA-NSCLC.

Chemotherapy-free radiotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors: a new regimen for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer?

Maintenance immunotherapy after concurrent chemoradiotherapy remains the standard therapeutic approach in patients with unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). The efficacy of pembrolizumab without chemotherapy in stage IV NSCLC has incited interest in similar approaches for LA-NSCLC. Several recent investigations involving the synergistic potential of immunotherapy combined with radiotherapy (iRT) have generated encouraging results. This review discusses the existing studies and prospective directions of chemotherapy-free iRT strategies in unresectable LA-NSCLC. Although the initial findings of chemotherapy-free iRT strategies have shown promising efficacy, we must consider the methodologic limitations of current studies and the myriad of challenges that accompany the implementation of chemotherapy-free iRT. These challenges include determining the optimal dose and fractionation, precise target volume delineation, and identification of additional suitable patient cohorts. Furthermore, the feasibility of chemotherapy-free iRT as a novel treatment modality for select patients with LA-NSCLC is contingent upon validation through randomized phase III trials.

The Best Supportive Care in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is a major cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents most lung cancer cases, and approximately one-third of patients present with stage III disease at diagnosis. As multiple treatment plans can be adopted for these patients depending on tumor size and nodal staging, stage III NSCLC management is challenging. Over the past decades, multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have been implemented in healthcare services to coordinate actions among the different health care professionals involved in cancer care. The aim of this review was to discuss real-world evidence of the impact of MDTs on stage III NSCLC management, survival, and quality of life. Here, we performed a literature review to investigate the role of nutrition and navigational nursing in NSCLC care and the influence of MDTs in the choice of treatment plans, including immunotherapy consolidation, and in the management of chemotherapy and radiotherapy-related adverse events. We also performed a mapping review to identify gaps in the implementation of cancer care MDTs in healthcare services around the world.

Radiation combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: synergistic mechanisms, current state, challenges, and orientations

Until the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), definitive radiotherapy (RT) concurrently with chemotherapy was recommended for unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC). The trimodality paradigm with consolidation ICIs following definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy has been the standard of care since the PACIFIC trial. Preclinical evidence has demonstrated the role of RT in the cancer-immune cycle and the synergistic effect of RT combined with ICIs (iRT). However, RT exerts a double-edged effect on immunity and the combination strategy still could be optimized in many areas. In the context of LA-NSCLC, optimized RT modality, choice, timing, and duration of ICIs, care for oncogenic addicted tumors, patient selection, and novel combination strategies require further investigation. Targeting these blind spots, novel approaches are being investigated to cross the borders of PACIFIC. We discussed the development history of iRT and summarized the updated rationale for the synergistic effect. We then summarized the available research data on the efficacy and toxicity of iRT in LA-NSCLC for cross-trial comparisons to eliminate barriers. Progression during and after ICIs consolidation therapy has been regarded as a distinct resistance scenario from primary or secondary resistance to ICIs, the subsequent management of which has also been discussed. Finally, based on unmet needs, we probed into the challenges, strategies, and auspicious orientations to optimize iRT in LA-NSCLC. In this review, we focus on the underlying mechanisms and recent advances of iRT with an emphasis on future challenges and directions that warrant further investigation. Taken together, iRT is a proven and potential strategy in LA-NSCLC, with multiple promising approaches to further improve the efficacy. Video Abstract.

CT-based radiomics nomogram may predict who can benefit from adaptive radiotherapy in patients with local advanced-NSCLC patients

BACKGROUND

Although adaptive radiotherapy (ART) has many advantages, ART is not universal in the clinical appliance due to the consumption of a lot of labor, and economic burden. It is necessary to explore a CT stimulation-based radiomics model for screening who can get more benefits from ART in locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

METHOD

183 cases of NSCLC patients receiving concurrent chemoradiotherapy with an adaptive approach were enrolled as a primary cohort, while 28 cases from another hospital served as an independent external validation cohort. Tumor regression assessment was conducted based on GTV reduction (Criteria A) or according to RECIST Version 1.1(Criteria B). The radiomics features were extracted by the "PyRadiomics" package and further screened by the LASSO method. Then, logistic regression was used to establish the model. Bootstrap and external validation were applied to verify the stability of the model. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was delineated to assess the predictive efficacy of the radiomics model. Dose-volume histograms were quantitatively compared between the initial and composite ART plans. Clinical endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULT

There were no significant differences in clinical features between tumor regression-resistant (RR) and tumor regression-sensitivity (RS) groups. The AUC values of the Criteria A model and Criteria B model were 0.767 and 0.771, respectively. Bootstrapping validation and external validation confirmed the stability of models. In all patients, there was a significant benefit of ART in the lung, heart, cord, and esophagus compared to non-ART, particularly in RS patients. Furthermore, PFS and OS from ART were significantly longer in RS as defined by Criterion B than in RR patients with the same ART application.

CONCLUSION

CT-based radiomics can screen out the patients who can gain more benefits from ART, which contribute to guiding and popularizing the application of ART strategy in the clinic within economic benefits and feasibility.

Use of durvalumab in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer based on eligibility for the PACIFIC study

BACKGROUND

Durvalumab following concurrent chemoradiotherapy is standard treatment for unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer based on the results of the PACIFIC trial. Based on trial criteria, not all patients are eligible for durvalumab in routine clinical practice.

METHODS

We evaluated eligibility for durvalumab in a real-world clinical setting and the impact of eligibility on outcomes. Consecutive patients treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy at two tertiary centers between January 2015 and June 2022 were assessed. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were evaluated based on eligibility criteria for the PACIFIC trial.

RESULTS

A total of 126 patients were included. Seventy patients (56%) were eligible for durvalumab. Ineligibility was associated with shorter progression-free survival of 9.7 months versus 18.4 months (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.95, p = 0.029) and overall survival of 26.4 months versus 58.7 months (HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.28-0.80, p = 0.005). Common reasons for ineligibility were history of previous malignancy (32%) and progressive disease or death during chemoradiotherapy (25%). Ineligible patients who received durvalumab had similar outcomes to eligible patients who received durvalumab.

CONCLUSIONS

In a real-world cohort, adjuvant durvalumab is safe and beneficial in a substantial proportion of patients who would not have been eligible for the PACIFIC trial.

The critical components for effective adaptive radiotherapy in patients with unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer: who, when and how

Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) is a new radiotherapy technology based on image-guided radiation therapy technology, used to avoid radiation overexposure to residual tumors and the surrounding normal tissues. Tumors undergoing the same radiation doses and modes can occur unequal shrinkage due to the variation of response times to radiation doses in different patients. To perform ART effectively, eligible patients with a high probability of benefits from ART need to be identified. Confirming the precise timetable for ART in every patient is another urgent problem to be resolved. Moreover, the outcomes of ART are different depending on the various image guidance used. This review discusses 'who, when and how' as the three key factors involved in the most effective implementation for the management of ART.

Effectiveness of durvalumab consolidation in stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: focus on treatment selection and prognostic factors

The pivotal PACIFIC trial defined durvalumab consolidation as the new standard of care in patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer treated with definitive radiochemotherapy. The authors characterized the durvalumab effect after induction chemotherapy according to the ESPATUE trial and definitive radiochemotherapy. All consecutive patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer receiving definitive radiochemotherapy between January 2017 and February 2020 were included. Primary end points were progression-free survival and overall survival. Altogether, 160 patients (75 PD-L1-positive, 62 PD-L1-negative, 23 unknown) received definitive radiochemotherapy, 146 (91%) of whom received prior induction chemotherapy. Durvalumab consolidation showed high effectiveness overall and in the good-risk group according to the PACIFIC trial (log-rank test: p < 0.005). Hazard ratios for progression-free survival and overall survival were at the lower limits of those in the PACIFIC trial. These results were robust to adjustment for potential confounders by propensity score weighting. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was the most important pretreatment prognostic factor.

Immunotherapy in unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: state of the art and novel therapeutic approaches

The standard of care for patients with stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) followed by 1 year of adjuvant durvalumab. Despite the survival benefit granted by immunotherapy in this setting, only 1/3 of patients are alive and disease free at 5 years. Novel treatment strategies are under development to improve patient outcomes in this setting: different anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 [anti-PD-(L)1] antibodies after CCRT, consolidation immunotherapy after sequential chemoradiotherapy, induction immunotherapy before CCRT and immunotherapy concurrent with CCRT and/or sequential chemoradiotherapy. Cross-trial comparison is particularly challenging in this setting due to the different timing of immunotherapy delivery and different patients' inclusion and exclusion criteria. In this review, we present the results of clinical trials investigating immune therapy in unresectable stage III NSCLC and discuss in-depth their biological rationale, their pitfalls and potential benefits. Particular emphasis is placed on the potential mechanisms of synergism between chemotherapy, radiation therapy and different monoclonal antibodies, and how this affects the tumor immune microenvironment. The designs and questions tackled by ongoing clinical trials are also discussed. Last, we address open questions and unmet clinical needs, such as the necessity for predictive biomarkers (e.g. radiomics and circulating tumor DNA). Identifying distinct subsets of patients to tailor anticancer treatment is a priority, especially in a heterogeneous disease such as stage III NSCLC.

Radiotherapy Patterns of Care for Locally-advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the Pre- and Post-durvalumab Era: A Region-wide Survey in a Japanese Prefecture

The promising results of the PACIFIC study led to the approval of consolidation durvalumab for coverage by the National Health Insurance (NHI) in 2018 for patients with locally-advanced unresectable non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). However, the effect of NHI coverage on the patterns of care for this population remains unclear. Here, we conducted a questionnaire-based survey to determine the patterns of care for patients with stage II-III NSCLC treated with definitive radiotherapy in 2017 (pre-durvalumab era) or in 2019 (post-durvalumab era). Data were obtained from 11 radiotherapy facilities in Gunma prefecture, which has a population of 1.94 million. We identified 80 and 83 patients with stage II-III NSCLC who received definitive radiotherapy in Gunma in 2017 and 2019, respectively. At a given facility, CCRT was the treatment of choice in a significantly greater proportion of patients in 2019 than in 2017 (66% ± 20% vs 51% ± 29%, P = 0.041). Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was more frequent in 2019 than in 2017 (24% vs 1.2%). Carboplatin plus paclitaxel was used for CCRT at higher rate in 2019 than in 2017 (73% vs 44%). Consolidation durvalumab was performed in 73% (40/55) of CCRT-treated patients in 2019, and the treatment was performed for the planned 12 months in 45% (18/40) of patients. These data indicate that NHI coverage of durvalumab might be a possible reason for choosing CCRT in patients with stage II-III NSCLC in the real-world setting.

Patterns of Care in Maintenance Therapy in US Patients Undergoing Definitive Chemoradiation for Stage 3 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

OBJECTIVE

The recommended treatment for patients with unresectable stage 3 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is definitive chemoradiation followed by 1 year of maintenance durvalumab. Our objective was to assess the rate of maintenance durvalumab use after chemoradiation.

METHODS

Analyses were conducted in both open claims (IQVIA pharmacy and medical claims data) and adjudicated closed claims (IQVIA PharMetrics Plus Health Plan Claims Database). Patients with a lung cancer diagnosis between November 2017 and November 2020 who received definitive chemoradiation were included.

RESULTS

Of the 5802 NSCLC patients included in the open claims source, 1794 (31%) received durvalumab, 1403 (24%) received maintenance chemotherapy, and 2605 (45%) did not receive any maintenance therapy. Of the 239 NSCLC patients included in the closed claims source, 127 (53%) received durvalumab, 40 (17%) received maintenance chemotherapy, and 72 (30%) did not receive any maintenance therapy. The most common maintenance chemotherapy agents patients received were carboplatin, pemetrexed, and paclitaxel.

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of durvalumab utilization was overall low in both the open and closed claims data sources (31% and 53%, respectively). It remains unknown what percent of eligible patients end up receiving durvalumab, as our analysis was unable to filter out patients who were unfit for durvalumab or if they had progression after chemoradiation. Future efforts are needed to increase maintenance durvalumab utilization and to determine how best to manage patients who are unfit for durvalumab.

Prospective analysis of factors precluding the initiation of durvalumab from an interim analysis of a phase II trial of S-1 and cisplatin with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy followed by durvalumab for unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in Japan (SAMURAI study)

Background:

The standard of care for unresectable, locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by durvalumab, based on the PACIFIC trial. Disease progression and pneumonitis were reported as the main reasons to preclude the initiation of durvalumab in multiple retrospective studies. However, the transition rate and the reasons for failure to proceed to consolidation therapy with durvalumab after CRT were not evaluated prospectively. Although phase II studies in Japan have shown high efficacy and tolerability of CRT with cisplatin + S-1 (SP), no prospective study using durvalumab after SP-based CRT has yet been reported. We therefore conducted a phase II study to verify the efficacy and safety of durvalumab following SP-based CRT. In this interim analysis, we report the transition rate and the reasons for its failure.

Methods:

In treatment-naïve LA-NSCLC, cisplatin (60 mg/m², day 1) and S-1 (80–120 mg/body, days 1–14) were administered with two 4-week cycles with concurrent thoracic radiotherapy (60 Gy) followed by durvalumab every 2 weeks for up to 12 months. The primary endpoint was 12 month progression-free survival rate.

Results:

Fifty-nine patients were enrolled, of whom 86.4% (51/59) proceeded to durvalumab. All of them initiated durvalumab within 42 days after CRT [median 18 days (range: 3–38)], including 27.5% (14/51) in <14 days. Common reasons for failure to proceed to durvalumab were disease progression (2/59, 3.4%) and adverse events (6/59, 10.2%). Among the latter cases, four resumed treatment and proceeded to durvalumab within 42 days on off-protocol. The objective response rate and the disease control rate were 62.7% and 93.2%, respectively. The incidences of ⩾grade 3 pneumonitis, febrile neutropenia, and esophagitis were 0%, 8.5%, and 3.4%, respectively.

Conclusion:

Regarding durvalumab after CRT, this interim analysis of the SAMURAI study clarified the high transition rate, early introduction, and reasons for failure to proceed to consolidation therapy, which were not determined in the PACIFIC trial.

Trial registration:

Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs031190127, registered 1 November, 2019, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs031190127.

Immunotherapy for Stage III NSCLC: Durvalumab and Beyond

Immunocheckpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have altered the treatment landscape of a wide range of malignancies, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This class of agents inhibits the interaction between PD1 and PDL1, and was shown to be efficacious in the landmark PACIFIC trial with 1 year of maintenance durvalumab (anti-PDL1 antibody). This trial demonstrated that its use as a consolidation treatment given after definitive chemoradiotherapy improved progression free survival and overall survival compared to standard-of-care treatment. In this review, we discuss both clinical trial and real-world data that have been published since PACIFIC that support the use of durvalumab for stage III unresectable NSCLC. In addition, we highlight specific populations that may require special considerations for the use of durvalumab in this setting, such as oncogene-addicted NSCLC, the toxicity of immunotherapy, and future directions in ICI research in stage III NSCLC.

The Impact of the Availability of Immunotherapy on Patterns of Care in Stage III NSCLC: A Dutch Multicenter Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Treatment patterns in stage III NSCLC can vary considerably between countries. The PACIFIC trial reported improvements in progression-free and overall survival with adjuvant durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). We studied treatment decision-making by three Dutch regional thoracic multidisciplinary tumor boards between 2015 and 2019, to identify changes in practice when adjuvant durvalumab became available.

METHODS

Details of patients presenting with stage III NSCLC were retrospectively collected. Both CCRT and multimodality schemes incorporating planned surgery were defined as being radical-intent treatment (RIT).

RESULTS

Of 855 eligible patients, most (95%) were discussed at a thoracic multidisciplinary tumor board, which recommended a RIT in 63% (n = 510). Only 52% (n = 424) of the patients finally received a RIT. Predictors for not recommending RIT were age greater than or equal to 70 years, WHO performance score greater than or equal to 2, Charlson comorbidity index greater than or equal to 2 (excluding age), forced expiratory volume in 1 second less than 80% of predicted value, N3 disease, and period of diagnosis. Between 2015 to 2017 and 2018 to 2019, the proportion of patients undergoing CCRT increased from 34% to 42% (p = 0.02) and use of sequential chemoradiotherapy declined (21%-16%, p = 0.05). Rates of early toxicity and 1-year mortality were comparable for both periods. After 2018, 57% of the patients who underwent CCRT (90 of 159) received adjuvant durvalumab.

CONCLUSIONS

After publication of the PACIFIC trial, a significant increase was observed in the use of CCRT for patients with stage III NSCLC with rates of early toxicity and mortality being unchanged. Since 2018, 57% of the patients undergoing CCRT went on to receive adjuvant durvalumab. Nevertheless, approximately half of the patients were still considered unfit for a RIT.