The Mechanisms Leading to Distinct Responses to PD-1/PD-L1 Blockades in Colorectal Cancers With Different MSI Statuses

Can immunotherapy reinforce chemotherapy efficacy? a new perspective on colorectal cancer treatment

As one of the main threats to human life (the fourth most dangerous and prevalent cancer), colorectal cancer affects many people yearly, decreases patients' quality of life, and causes irreparable financial and social damages. In addition, this type of cancer can metastasize and involve the liver in advanced stages. However, current treatments can't completely eradicate this disease. Chemotherapy and subsequent surgery can be mentioned among the current main treatments for this disease. Chemotherapy has many side effects, and regarding the treatment of this type of tumor, chemotherapy can lead to liver damage, such as steatohepatitis, steatosis, and sinus damage. These damages can eventually lead to liver failure and loss of its functions. Therefore, it seems that other treatments can be used in addition to chemotherapy to increase its efficiency and reduce its side effects. Biological therapies and immunotherapy are one of the leading suggestions for combined treatment. Antibodies (immune checkpoint blockers) and cell therapy (DC and CAR-T cells) are among the immune system-based treatments used to treat tumors. Immunotherapy targets various aspects of the tumor that may lead to 1) the recruitment of immune cells, 2) increasing the immunogenicity of tumor cells, and 3) leading to the elimination of inhibitory mechanisms established by the tumor. Therefore, immunotherapy can be used as a complementary treatment along with chemotherapy. This review will discuss different chemotherapy and immunotherapy methods for colorectal cancer. Then we will talk about the studies that have dealt with combined treatment.

Clinicopathological characteristics of high microsatellite instability/mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer: A narrative review

Colorectal cancers (CRCs) with high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) and deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) show molecular and clinicopathological characteristics that differ from those of proficient mismatch repair/microsatellite stable CRCs. Despite the importance of MSI-H/dMMR status in clinical decision making, the testing rates for MSI and MMR in clinical practice remain low, even in high-risk populations. Additionally, the real-world prevalence of MSI-H/dMMR CRC may be lower than that reported in the literature. Insufficient MSI and MMR testing fails to identify patients with MSI-H/dMMR CRC, who could benefit from immunotherapy. In this article, we describe the current knowledge of the clinicopathological features, molecular landscape, and radiomic characteristics of MSI-H/dMMR CRCs. A better understanding of the importance of MMR/MSI status in the clinical characteristics and prognosis of CRC may help increase the rates of MMR/MSI testing and guide the development of more effective therapies based on the unique features of these tumors.

The distinct clinical trajectory, metastatic sites, and immunobiology of microsatellite-instability-high cancers

Microsatellite-instability-high (MSI-H) cancers form a spectrum of solid organ tumors collectively known as Lynch Syndrome cancers, occurring not only in a subset of colorectal, endometrial, small bowel, gastric, pancreatic, and biliary tract cancers but also in prostate, breast, bladder, and thyroid cancers. Patients with Lynch Syndrome harbor germline mutations in mismatch repair genes, with a high degree of genomic instability, leading to somatic hypermutations and, therefore, oncogenesis and cancer progression. MSI-H cancers have unique clinicopathological characteristics compared to their microsatellite-stable (MSS) counterparts, marked by a higher neoantigen load, immune cell infiltration, and a marked clinical response to immune checkpoint blockade. Patients with known Lynch Syndrome may be detected early through surveillance, but some patients present with disseminated metastatic disease. The treatment landscape of MSI-H cancers, especially colorectal cancers, has undergone a paradigm shift and remains to be defined, with immune checkpoint blockade coming to the forefront of treatment strategies in the stage IV setting. We summarize in this review the clinical features of MSI-H cancers with a specific interest in the pattern of spread or recurrence, disease trajectory, and treatment strategies. We also summarize the tumor-immune landscape and genomic profile of MSI-H cancers and potential novel therapeutic strategies.

Durable complete response to pembrolizumab in microsatellite stable colorectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Immunotherapy by checkpoint inhibitors, i.e., anti-programmed death-1(PD-1) or anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies, has gained more attention managing solid tumors. Pembrolizumab (an anti-PD-1 antibody) in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) was approved in 2017 by the US FDA.

REASON FOR THE REPORT

Pembrolizumab is not effective in microsatellite stable, mismatch-repair-proficient (MSS-pMMR) molecular phenotype, which comprises most CRC patients. In this report, we present the first case of metastatic CRC with a dramatic and durable response to pembrolizumab despite being of MSS-pMMR phenotype. A 34-year-old woman, presented seven years ago with T3N2bM0 colon cancer and an appendix carcinoid tumor. The last relapse with bilateral pulmonary metastases was refractory to all treatments. Although it seemed unresponsive to immunotherapy because of MSS molecular phenotype, due to the high expression level of PD-L1 (85%), we started treatment with pembrolizumab 200 mg every three weeks and continued for the overall 19 courses. Surprisingly, a rapid and complete response was observed that last until now, i.e., 17 months after discontinuation of pembrolizumab.

OUTCOME

Despite non-promising results in the current clinical trials, MSS-pMMR colorectal cancer patients' deprivation from immunotherapy seems not to be reasonable. There are ongoing clinical trials on checkpoint inhibitors either alone or in combination with other drugs. However, immunostaining for PD-L1 should be considered as a possible response predictor. Immunotherapy either by cell-based approaches or by checkpoint inhibitors may revolutionize cancer treatment Pembrolizumab has been approved by the FDA in 2017 for colorectal cancer. However, MSS-pMMR molecular phenotype which comprises the majority of CRC patients, has not shown a good response to checkpoint inhibitors. We present a MSS-pMMR case with complete and durable response to pembrolizumab We suggest immunostaining for PD-L1 as a possible response predictor to checkpoint inhibitors.

Tumor response as defined by iRECIST in gastrointestinal malignancies treated with PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors and correlation with survival

BACKGROUND

Atypical tumor response patterns during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy pose a challenge to clinicians and investigators in immuno-oncology practice. This study evaluated tumor burden dynamics to identify imaging biomarkers for treatment response and overall survival (OS) in advanced gastrointestinal malignancies treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled a total of 198 target lesions in 75 patients with advanced gastrointestinal malignancies treated with PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors between January 2017 and March 2021. Tumor diameter changes as defined by immunotherapy Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (iRECIST) were studied to determine treatment response and association with OS.

RESULTS

Based on the best overall response, the tumor diameter ranged from - 100 to + 135.3% (median: - 9.6%). The overall response rate was 32.0% (24/75), and the rate of durable disease control for at least 6 months was 30.7% (23/75, one (iCR, immune complete response) or 20 iPR (immune partial response), or 2iSD (immune stable disease). Using univariate analysis, patients with a tumor diameter maintaining a < 20% increase (48/75, 64.0%) from baseline had longer OS than those with ≥20% increase (27/75, 36.0%) and, a reduced risk of death (median OS: 80 months vs. 48 months, HR = 0.22, P = 0.034). The differences in age (HR = 1.09, P = 0.01), combined surgery (HR = 0.15, P = 0.01) and cancer type (HR = 0.23, P = 0.001) were significant. In multivariable analysis, patients with a tumor diameter with a < 20% increase had notably reduced hazards of death (HR = 0.15, P = 0.01) after adjusting for age, combined surgery, KRAS status, cancer type, mismatch repair (MMR) status, treatment course and cancer differentiation. Two patients (2.7%) showed pseudoprogression.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor diameter with a < 20% increase from baseline during therapy in gastrointestinal malignancies was associated with therapeutic benefit and longer OS and may serve as a practical imaging marker for treatment response, clinical outcome and treatment decision making.

Clinical Study of Sintilimab as Second-Line or Above Therapy in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Background

The present study was conducted to analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of sintilimab as second-line or above therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.

Methods

Patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer that progressed after prior systemic therapies and treated with sintilimab from March 2019 to July 2020 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety.

Results

Fifty-two patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer received sintilimab monotherapy or combination therapy after they failed from prior systemic therapies. Eight patients achieved partial response (PR), 26 patients had stable disease (SD), and 18 patients had progressive disease (PD). The ORR and DCR were 15.4% (8/52) and 65.4% (34/52), respectively. Median PFS was 2.5 months (95% CI = 2.0–3.0), and median OS was 5.8 months (95% CI = 4.9–6.7). The ORR and DCR were 30.0% (6/20) and 80.0% (16/20), respectively, in intestinal subtype, which were superior than in non-intestinal subtype (ORR: 6.3%, DCR: 56.3%). Patients with intestinal subtype obtained longer PFS (4.0 vs. 1.9) and OS (9.0 vs. 4.1) than those with non-intestinal subtype. The incidence of grade 3–4 adverse events was 44.2%.

Conclusions

Sintilimab monotherapy or combination therapy provides a feasible therapeutic strategy for patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer who failed from prior systemic therapies. The efficacy of sintilimab in intestinal subtype was superior than that in non-intestinal subtype.

Combined Gemcitabine and Immune-Checkpoint Inhibition Conquers Anti-PD-L1 Resistance in Low-Immunogenic Mismatch Repair-Deficient Tumors

Tumors arising in the context of Lynch Syndrome or constitutional mismatch repair deficiency are hypermutated and have a good response towards immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including α-PD-L1 antibodies. However, in most cases, resistance mechanisms evolve. To improve outcomes and prevent resistance development, combination approaches are warranted. Herein, we applied a combined regimen with an α-PD-L1 antibody and gemcitabine in a preclinical tumor model to activate endogenous antitumor immune responses. Mlh1^−/− mice with established gastrointestinal tumors received the α-PD-L1 antibody (clone 6E11; 2.5 mg/kg bw, i.v., q2wx3) and gemcitabine (100 mg/kg bw, i.p., q4wx3) in mono- or combination therapy. Survival and tumor growth were recorded. Immunological changes in the blood were routinely examined via multi-color flow cytometry and complemented by ex vivo frameshift mutation analysis to identify alterations in Mlh1^−/−-tumor-associated target genes. The combined therapy of α-PD-L1 and gemcitabine prolonged median overall survival of Mlh1^−/− mice from four weeks in the untreated control group to 12 weeks, accompanied by therapy-induced tumor growth inhibition, as measured by ^[18F]-FDG PET/CT. Plasma cytokine levels of IL13, TNFα, and MIP1β were increased and also higher than in mice receiving either monotherapy. Circulating splenic and intratumoral myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), as well as M2 macrophages, were markedly reduced. Besides, residual tumor specimens from combi-treated mice had increased numbers of infiltrating cytotoxic T-cells. Frameshift mutations in APC, Tmem60, and Casc3 were no longer detectable upon treatment, likely because of the successful eradication of single mutated cell clones. By contrast, novel mutations appeared. Collectively, we herein confirm the safe application of combined chemo-immunotherapy by long-term tumor growth control to prevent the development of resistance mechanisms.