Safety of PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Combined With Palliative Radiotherapy and Anti-Angiogenic Therapy in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Exploring the Evolving Landscape of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) carries significant morbidity and mortality. Management of the HCC requires a multidisciplinary approach. Surgical resection and liver transplantation are the gold standard options for the appropriate settings. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has emerged as a promising treatment modality in managing HCC; its use is more studied and well-established in advanced HCC (aHCC). Current clinical guidelines universally endorse SBRT as a viable alternative to radiofrequency ablation (RFA), transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE), and transarterial radioembolisation (TARE), a recommendation substantiated by literature demonstrating comparable efficacy among these modalities. In early-stage HCC, SBRT primarily manages unresectable tumours unsuitable for ablative procedures such as microwave ablation and RFA. SBRT has been incorporated as a modality to downstage tumours or as a bridge to transplant. In the case of intermediate or advanced HCC, SBRT offers excellent results either as a single modality or adjunct to other locoregional modalities such as TACE/TARE. Recent data from late-stage HCC patients illustrate the effectiveness of SBRT in achieving local tumour control while minimising damage to surrounding healthy liver tissue. It has promising local control of approximately 80-90% in managing HCC. Additional prospective data comparing the efficacy of SBRT with the first-line recommended therapies such as RFA, TACE, and surgery are essential. The standard of care for patients with advanced/metastatic disease is systemic therapy (immunotherapy/tyrosine kinase inhibitors). SBRT, in combination with immune-checkpoint inhibitors, has an immune-modulatory effect that results in a synergistic effect. Recent findings indicate that the combination of immunotherapy and SBRT in HCC is well-tolerated and exhibits synergistic effects. Further exploration of diverse immunotherapy and radiotherapy strategies is essential to identify the appropriate time for combination treatments and to optimise dose and fraction regimens. Prospective, randomised studies are imperative to establish SBRT as the primary treatment for HCC.

Sintilimab plus bevacizumab combined with radiotherapy as first-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus: A multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Systemic treatments are listed as first-line therapies for HCC with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), resulting in modest efficacy. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab plus bevacizumab combined with radiotherapy in HCC with PVTT and to identify prognostic biomarkers.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

This open-label, multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 clinical trial was conducted at 3 tertiary hospitals in China. A total of 46 patients with HCC with PVTT were enrolled. All the patients received the first cycle of i.v. sintilimab (200 mg, day 1) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg, day 1) within 3 days after enrollment. Radiotherapy (30-50 Gy/10 fractions) was administered after 2 cycles of Sin-Bev. Sin-Bev was disrupted during radiotherapy and resumed 2 weeks after radiotherapy and continued every 3 weeks thereafter until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary end point was objective response rate. Patients obtained an objective response rate of 58.7% and a disease control rate of 100%. After a median follow-up time of 26.0 months (95% CI: 24.0-26.0), the median OS was 24.0 months (95% CI: 19.0 to not applicable) and the median progression-free survival was 13.8 months (95% CI: 12.0-21.0), respectively. No unexpected adverse events or treatment-related deaths occurred. Mutations of PCTMD1 were predictive of shorter OS and progression-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Sintilimab plus bevacizumab combined with radiotherapy provides favorable treatment response and survival outcomes along with an acceptable safety profile in the first-line setting for patients with HCC with PVTT (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05010434).

Evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of combining PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with anti-angiogenic agents in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, particularly when diagnosed at an unresectable stage. Traditional treatments for advanced HCC have limited efficacy, prompting the exploration of combination therapies. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the effectiveness and safety of combining PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with anti-angiogenic agents in patients with unresectable HCC.

Methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and Web of Science, including studies up to June 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing combination therapy (PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with anti-angiogenic agents) to monotherapy or standard treatments in unresectable HCC patients were included. Data were synthesized using random-effects models, with pooled hazard ratios (HRs) for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and risk ratios (RRs) for objective response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs).

Results

Five Phase III RCTs involving 1515 patients were included. Combination therapy significantly improved OS (HR: 0.71, 95% CI: 0.60-0.85) and PFS (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.53-0.77) compared to monotherapy or standard treatments. The pooled OR for ORR was 1.27 (95% CI: 1.57-2.11), indicating a higher response rate with combination therapy. However, the risk of AEs was also higher in the combination therapy group (RR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.02-1.06). Subgroup analyses revealed consistent benefits across different types of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors and anti-angiogenic agents, with no significant publication bias detected.

Conclusions

The combination of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors with anti-angiogenic agents offers significant benefits in improving OS and PFS in patients with unresectable HCC, although it is associated with an increased risk of adverse events.

Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Combined With Lenvatinib With or Without PD-1 Inhibitors as Initial Treatment for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical benefit and safety of the triple combination of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), lenvatinib, and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors with the dual combination of SBRT and lenvatinib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with uHCC who received SBRT in combination with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors or SBRT in combination with lenvatinib alone as first-line treatment from October 2018 to July 2022 were reviewed in this study. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were intrahepatic PFS, extrahepatic PFS, and objective remission rate. In addition, safety profiles were assessed by analyzing treatment-related adverse events between the two groups to assess safety profiles.

RESULTS

In total, 214 patients with uHCC who received combination therapy were included in this retrospective study. Among them, 146 patients received triple combination therapy of SBRT, lenvatinib, and PD-1 inhibitors (SBRT-L-P group), and 68 patients received dual therapy of SBRT and lenvatinib (SBRT-L group). The median OS times of the 2 groups were 31.2 months and 17.4 months, respectively (P < .001). The median PFS time was significantly longer in the SBRT-L-P group than in the SBRT-L group (15.6 months vs 8.8 months, P < .001). Additionally, the median intrahepatic PFS (17.5 vs 9.9 months, P < .001) and extrahepatic PFS (20.9 vs 11.6 months, P < .001) were significantly longer in the SBRT-L-P group than in the SBRT-L group. The objective remission rate in the SBRT-L-P group was higher than in the SBRT-L group (63.0 vs 39.7%, P = .002). The incidence and severity of treatment-related adverse events in the SBRT-L-P group were comparable to those in the SBRT-L group.

CONCLUSION

The use of both lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors with SBRT in patients with uHCC was associated with improved overall survival compared with lenvatinib and SBRT alone with a manageable safety profile.

Radiation Therapy With Combination Therapy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Antiangiogenic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with antiangiogenic therapy have limited efficacy in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The synergistic effect of systemic therapy and radiation therapy (RT) might resolve this problem. We aimed to investigate the effect of RT on the treatment outcomes of ICIs and antiangiogenic combination therapy in patients with advanced-stage HCC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective observational study analyzed the medical records of 194 patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C HCC who were admitted to our center from August 2018 to June 2022 and received ICIs combined with antiangiogenic therapy as the first-line treatment. Patients who were administered RT for tumor thrombus or symptomatic metastases within 8 weeks of the commencement of combination therapy were allocated to the RT group, whereas those who did not receive RT were assigned to the non-radiation therapy (NRT) group. Propensity score matching was used to mitigate selection bias. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate (DCR), local PFS, out-of-field PFS, and treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients diagnosed with advanced-stage HCC and treated with ICIs and antiangiogenic therapy were included in the study, with 33 patients in the RT group and 43 patients in the non-RT group. After propensity score matching, 29 matched patient pairs were generated. The median follow-up was 15.5 months, and the RT sites were mainly located on the tumor thrombus (55.2%) and extrahepatic metastatic lesions (48.3%). The median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.4-11.3) in the RT group and 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.4-5.0) in the NRT group (P < .001). The median OS was not reached in the RT group and was 9.7 months (95% CI, 4.1-15.3) in the NRT group (P = .002). The objective response rate was 75.9% (95% CI, 56.5-89.7) in the RT group and 24.1% (95% CI, 10.3-43.5) in the NRT group (P < .001). The DCR was 100% in the RT group and 75.9% (95% CI, 56.5-89.7) in the NRT group (P = .005). The median local PFS and out-of-field PFS were 13.2 months (95% CI, 6.3-20.1) and 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.0-14.7), respectively. RT was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.64; P < .001) and OS (hazard ratio = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.68; P = .005), respectively. The rates of any grade treatment-related adverse events were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison to the combination of ICIs and antiangiogenic therapy, the inclusion of RT has been observed to improve the DCR and survival outcomes in patients with advanced-stage HCC. The safety profile of this triple therapy was satisfactory.

Liver-directed moderately hypo-fractionated radiotherapy combined with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective observational study of 23 cases

Background

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) monoclonal antibody combined with bevacizumab (a monoclonal antibody targeting vascular endothelial growth factor) has been established as first-line systemic treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Radiotherapy is a crucial local treatment for HCC. Mutual efficacy enhancement has been reported between radiotherapy, anti-angiogenesis therapy and immunotherapy in preclinical researches, but not been validated in clinical practice. Whether radiotherapy can enhance efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy plus bevacizumab for HCC remains unclear. This retrospective observational study aimed to appraise efficacy and safety of the combination of radiotherapy with pembrolizumab (a PD-1 monoclonal antibody) and bevacizumab for advanced HCC for the first time.

Methods

Patients with advanced HCC treated by intrahepatic tumor-directed moderately hypo-fractionated radiotherapy combined with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab were consecutively included. Clinicopathological characteristics, therapeutic outcomes and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were recorded and evaluated.

Results

A total of 23 patients were eventually enrolled. Median cycles of pembrolizumab and bevacizumab were 4 (median, 1-8) and 4 (median, 1-9) cycles. The objective response rates and disease control rates of irradiated intrahepatic HCC and non-irradiated extrahepatic HCC were 34.8% [95% confidence interval (CI), 16.4-57.3%] vs. 10.0% (95% CI, 1.2-31.7%), and 91.3% (95% CI, 72.0-98.9%) vs. 70.0% (95% CI, 45.7-88.1%), respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 6.6 (95% CI, 4.7-8.5) and 18.3 (95% CI, 8.2-33.6) months, and 12-month PFS and OS rates were 17.5% (95% CI, 7.0-28.0%) and 60.9% (95% CI, 50.7-71.1%). Two patients (8.7%) with locally advanced, unresectable HCC eventually underwent curative resection of tumors after this trimodal treatment. Eighteen patients (78.3%) had ≥ grade 3 TRAEs, with myelosuppression and transaminase increase as the most common.

Conclusions

This study firstly reported that combining radiotherapy with pembrolizumab and bevacizumab was preliminarily a feasible and effective therapeutic choice for advanced HCC in despite of more TRAEs. This tri-modal regimen may be a potential conversion therapy for unresectable, locally advanced HCC. The limitations of this study are its retrospective nature and small sample size; therefore, big-sample prospective studies are warranted to further investigate this tri-modal regimen.

The State of Systematic Therapies in Clinic for Hepatobiliary Cancers

Hepatobiliary cancer (HBC) includes hepatocellular carcinoma and biliary tract carcinoma (cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma), and its morbidity and mortality are significantly correlated with disease stage. Surgery is the cornerstone of curative therapy for early stage of HBC. However, a large proportion of patients with HBC are diagnosed with advanced stage and can only receive systemic treatment. According to the results of clinical trials, the first-line and second-line treatment programs are constantly updated with the improvement of therapeutic effectiveness. In order to improve the therapeutic effect, reduce the occurrence of drug resistance, and reduce the adverse reactions of patients, the treatment of HBC has gradually developed from single-agent therapy to combination. The traditional therapeutic philosophy proposed that patients with advanced HBC are only amenable to systematic therapies. With some encouraging clinical trial results, the treatment concept has been revolutionized, and patients with advanced HBC who receive novel systemic combination therapies with multi-modality treatment (including surgery, transplant, TACE, HAIC, RT) have significantly improved survival time. This review summarizes the treatment options and the latest clinical advances of HBC in each stage and discusses future direction, in order to inform the development of more effective treatments for HBC.

Progress in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with immune combination therapy

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a severe malignancy that poses a serious threat to human health. Owing to challenges in early diagnosis, most patients lose the opportunity for radical treatment when diagnosed. Nonetheless, recent advancements in cancer immunotherapy provide new directions for the treatment of HCC. For instance, monoclonal antibodies against immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) such as programmed cell death protein 1/death ligand-1 inhibitors and cytotoxic t-lymphocyte associated antigen-4 significantly improved the prognosis of patients with HCC. However, tumor cells can evade the immune system through various mechanisms. With the rapid development of genetic engineering and molecular biology, various new immunotherapies have been used to treat HCC, including ICIs, chimeric antigen receptor T cells, engineered cytokines, and certain cancer vaccines. This review summarizes the current status, research progress, and future directions of different immunotherapy strategies in the treatment of HCC.

Efficacy and safety of radiotherapy combined with anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in MSS/pMMR metastatic colorectal cancer

PURPOSE

Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of anti-angiogenic drugs in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with microsatellite stable (MSS) or mismatch repair proficient (pMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, whether combination radiotherapy (RT) can further improve the prognosis of mCRC patients after second-line treatment remains to be explored.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of data from mCRC patients who received anti-angiogenic targeted therapy (TT) and immunotherapy (IT) with or without RT after the failure of standard therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and safety were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 82 patients who received TT + IT were analyzed. For RT group (n = 42) versus NRT group (n = 40), ORR was 21.4% (9/42) versus 5.0% (2/40); DCR was 83.8% (35/42) versus 65.0% (26/40). Compared with NRT group, RT improved PFS (median: 5.0 vs. 3.6 months; p = 0.04) and OS (median: 15.2 vs. 7.2 months; p = 0.01). In addition, in the population receiving RT, the PFS of RT sequential/simultaneous TT + IT was superior to TT + IT sequential RT (median: 7.1 vs. 6.2 vs. 3.5 months, p = 0.004). Multivariate analysis suggested RT was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS. No treatment-related deaths were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with TT + IT, RT combined with TT + IT improved survival outcomes in MSS/pMMR mCRC patients, with manageable toxicity. RT sequential/simultaneous TT + IT treatment is expected to be the optimal strategy for MSS/PMMR mCRC.

Efficacy and safety of subsequent radiotherapy in patients with advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors

Background

The development of immunotherapy resistance is associated with a poor prognosis in patients diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are undergoing treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subsequent radiotherapy (RT) for patients with advanced-stage HCC who had lesion enlargement or new lesions (NLs) during ICI therapy.

Methods

This retrospective observational study enrolled 36 patients with advanced-stage HCC who underwent subsequent RT for lesion enlargement or NLs during ICI therapy from two centers. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), 1- and 2-year local control (LC) rates, in-field PFS (IFPFS), out-field PFS (OFPFS), and safety.

Results

The median follow-up time was 15.3 months. The median PFS was 7.4 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.1-11.7 months], and the median OS was 18.8 months (95% CI: 17.1-20.5 months). ORR and DCR were 38.9% and 72.2%, respectively. In addition, the median IFPFS was 17.8 months (95% CI: 11.5-24.2 months), median OFPFS was 7.9 months (95% CI: 3.4-12.5 months), and estimated 1- and 2-year LC rates were 67.1% and 31.9%, respectively. The most common treatment-related adverse events (all grades) were diarrhea (33.3%), rash (30.6%), and malaise (27.8%); a total of 14 (38.9%) patients developed grade 3-4 AEs.

Conclusions

Subsequent RT showed reliable antitumor effects and an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced-stage HCC who had unsatisfactory response to ICI therapy; therefore, it could serve as an optional salvage strategy.

Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Combined with Camrelizumab and Apatinib in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib with or without stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) as first-line therapy for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a multicenter, open-label, noncomparative, randomized trial that recruited patients with HCC with type II/III/IV PVTT, who had not previously received systemic therapy. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive camrelizumab (200 mg, every 3 weeks) and apatinib (250 mg, every day) with or without SBRT [95% planning target volume (PTV), 36-40 Gy/6-8 Gy]. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response, time to progression, and safety.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to two prospective cohorts. Median OS were 12.7 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.2-not available (NA)] and 8.6 months (95% CI, 5.6-NA), and median PFS were 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.3-7.0) and 2.5 months (95% CI, 2.0-7.6) for the SBRT and non-SBRT cohorts, respectively. The ORR and DCR were 47.5% and 72.5% in the SBRT cohort, and 20.0% and 40.0% in the non-SBRT cohort. The most common treatment-related adverse events of any grade were hypertension (55.0%), hand-foot syndrome (51.7%), and leukopenia (50.0%). Grade ≥ 3 was reported in 13 (21.7%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line treatment with camrelizumab-apatinib combined with or without SBRT showed clinical benefits in patients with HCC with PVTT, with an acceptable safety profile. Thus, these combination regimens may be potential options for such patients.

RIFLE: a Phase II trial of stereotactic ablative radiotherapy combined with fruquintinib and tislelizumab in metastatic colorectal cancer

Background

Currently, the prognosis for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) still remains poor. The management of mCRC has become manifold because of the varied advances in the systemic and topical treatment approaches. For patients with limited number of metastases, radical local therapy plus systemic therapy can be a good choice to achieve long-term tumor control. In this study, we aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of the combination of fruquintinib, tislelizumab, and stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) in mCRC (RIFLE study).

Methods

RIFLE was designed as a single-center, single-arm, prospective Phase II clinical trial. A total of 68 mCRC patients who have failed the first-line standard treatment will be recruited in the safety run-in phase (n = 6) and the expansion phase (n = 62), respectively. Eligible patients will receive SABR followed by fruquintinib (5 mg, d1-14, once every day) and tislelizumab (200 mg, d1, once every 3 weeks) within 2 weeks from completion of radiation. The expansion phase starts when the safety of the treatment is determined (dose limiting toxicity occur in no more than one-sixth of patients in the run-in phase). The primary end point is the objective response rate. The secondary end points include the disease control rate, duration of response, 3-year progression-free survival rate, 3-year overall survival rate, and toxicity.

Conclusions

The results of this trial will provide a novel insight into SABR in combination with PD-1 antibody and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor in the systematic treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, which is expected to provide new therapeutic strategies and improve the prognosis for mCRC patients.

Trial registration

NCT04948034 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Beyond atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: overall efficacy and safety of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in a real-world setting

BACKGROUND

In patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progressing after atezolizumab and bevacizumab, the optimal therapeutic sequence is still unclear and no second-line agent has proven its efficacy.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this retrospective multicenter real-world cohort study was to provide an evaluation of the efficacy and safety of the use of second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in this population.

METHODS

All patients with advanced HCC, treated in first-line setting by atezolizumab-bevacizumab, and who received at least one dose of treatment with TKI were included in this study. All the data were retrospectively collected from medical records. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were overall survival (OS), overall global survival (OGS), and safety. A total of 82 patients were included in this study.

RESULTS

Patients were assigned to the regorafenib group (n = 29, 35.4%) or other TKI (sorafenib n = 41, lenvatinib n = 8, or cabozantinib n = 4) group (n = 53). PFS was not significantly different between the two groups [2.6 versus 2.8 months, HR 1.07 (95% CI: 0.61-1.86), p = 0.818]. Median PFS rates were 2.6, 4.4, and 2.8 months in sorafenib-, lenvatinib-, and cabozantinib group, respectively. OS was statistically different between the regorafenib group and other TKI group [15.8 versus 7.0 months, HR 0.40 (95% CI: 0.20-0.79), p = 0.023]. When adjusting on confounding factors, there was still a difference in OS favoring the regorafenib group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.35, p = 0.019). OGS of patients who received regorafenib was improved compared to other TKI [18.6 versus 15.0 months, HR 0.42 (95% CI: 0.22-0.84), p = 0.036]. Twenty percent of patients had grade 3 and none had grade 4 or 5 adverse events. In patients who experienced disease progression and fit for a third-line treatment, 80% and 50% received cabozantinib in regorafenib group and other TKI group, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Efficacy of any TKI in the second-line setting was not affected by atezolizumab-bevacizumab treatment as first-line therapy. The safety profile in the second-line setting was consistent with the results shown in pivotal studies. PFS rates of patients were similar, regardless of TKI type. Regorafenib was associated with better OS and OGS rates compared to other TKI. These data need to be confirmed in prospective comparative studies.

Combined radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibition for the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers and a leading cause of cancer related death worldwide. Until recently, systemic therapy for advanced HCC, defined as Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B or C, was limited and ineffective in terms of long-term survival. However, over the past decade, immune check point inhibitors (ICI) combinations have emerged as a potential therapeutic option for patients with nonresectable disease. ICI modulate the tumor microenvironment to prevent progression of the tumor. Radiotherapy is a crucial tool in treating unresectable HCC and may enhance the efficacy of ICI by manipulating the tumor microenvironment and decreasing tumor resistance to certain therapies. We herein review developments in the field of ICI combined with radiotherapy for the treatment of HCC, as well as look at challenges associated with these treatment modalities, and review future directions of combination therapy.

Immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma: recent progress and new strategy

Due to its widespread occurrence and high mortality rate, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an abhorrent kind of cancer. Immunotherapy is a hot spot in the field of cancer treatment, represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), which aim to improve the immune system's ability to recognize, target and eliminate cancer cells. The composition of the HCC immune microenvironment is the result of the interaction of immunosuppressive cells, immune effector cells, cytokine environment, and tumor cell intrinsic signaling pathway, and immunotherapy with strong anti-tumor immunity has received more and more research attention due to the limited responsiveness of HCC to ICI monotherapy. There is evidence of an organic combination of radiotherapy, chemotherapy, anti-angiogenic agents and ICI catering to the unmet medical needs of HCC. Moreover, immunotherapies such as adoptive cellular therapy (ACT), cancer vaccines and cytokines also show encouraging efficacy. It can significantly improve the ability of the immune system to eradicate tumor cells. This article reviews the role of immunotherapy in HCC, hoping to improve the effect of immunotherapy and develop personalized treatment regimens.

Radiotherapy-induced tumor physical microenvironment remodeling to overcome immunotherapy resistance

The clinical benefits of immunotherapy are proven in many cancers, but a significant number of patients do not respond well to immunotherapy. The tumor physical microenvironment (TpME) has recently been shown to affect the growth, metastasis and treatment of solid tumors. The tumor microenvironment (TME) has unique physical hallmarks: 1) unique tissue microarchitecture, 2) increased stiffness, 3) elevated solid stress, and 4) elevated interstitial fluid pressure (IFP), which contribute to tumor progression and immunotherapy resistance in a variety of ways. Radiotherapy, a traditional and powerful treatment, can remodel the matrix and blood flow associated with the tumor to improve the response rate of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to a certain extent. Herein, we first review the recent research advances on the physical properties of the TME and then explain how TpME is involved in immunotherapy resistance. Finally, we discuss how radiotherapy can remodel TpME to overcome immunotherapy resistance.

Toripalimab in combination with Anlotinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after SBRT: A prospective, single-arm, single-center clinical study

Objective

Exposing tumor antigens to the immune system is the key to ensuring the efficacy of immunotherapy. SBRT is the main way to reveal the specifical antigens of tumors which can enhance the immune response. We aimed to explore the clinical efficacy and safety of Toripalimab combined with Anlotinib for uHCC after SBRT.

Methods

This is a prospective, single-arm, explorative clinical study. uHCC patients with an ECOG PS score of 0–1, Child–Pugh class A or B, and BCLC stage B or C were included and treated with SBRT(8Gy*3) followed by 6-cycle combinational therapy with Toripalimab and Anlotinib. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Continuous variables were presented as medians and ranges. Survivals were studied with the Kaplan-Meier method. Categorical data were expressed as n (percentage).

Results

Between June 2020 and October 2022, a total of 20 patients with intermediate-advanced uHCC were enrolled. All cases had multiple intrahepatic metastases, or macrovascular invasion, or both, among whom 5 cases with lymph node or distant metastases. Until September 2022, the median follow-up time was 7.2 months (range, 1.1-27.7 months). Median survival time could not be assessed at the moment, based on iRecist, median PFS was 7.4 months (range, 1.1-27.7 months), ORR 15.0%, and DCR 50.0%. 14 patients experienced treatment-related adverse events with an incidence of 70%. The overall survival rates at 18 months and 24 months were 61.1% and 50.9%, respectively. And the progression-free survival rates were 39.3% and 19.7%.

Conclusion

Exposure of specific antigens of HCC via SBRT may improve the efficacy of combinational therapy with Toripalimab and Anlotinib for uHCC with manageable adverse effects, which deserves further exploration.

Clinical trial registration

www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier ChiCTR2000032533.

Efficacy and safety of PD1/PDL1 inhibitors combined with radiotherapy and anti-angiogenic therapy for solid tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The triple combination of programmed cell death 1 (PD1)/programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL1) inhibitors, radiotherapy (RT), and anti-angiogenesis agents has been widely used in the treatment of solid tumors and has shown positive efficacy. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PD1/PDL1 inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenic agents and RT for the treatment of solid cancers.

METHODS

A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was conducted from inception to October 31, 2022. Studies involving patients with solid cancers who received PD1/PDL1 inhibitors combined with RT and anti-angiogenic agents treatment that reported overall response rate, complete remission rate, disease control rate, and adverse events (AEs) were included. A random-effects or fixed-effects model was used for the pooled rates, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were determined for all outcomes. The quality of the included literature was assessed using the methodological index for nonrandomized studies critical appraisal checklist. Egger test was used to assess the publication bias in the included studies.

RESULTS

Ten studies (4 nonrandomized controlled trials and 6 single-arm trials), including 365 patients, were identified and included in the meta-analysis. The pooled overall response rate after treatment with PD1/PDL1 inhibitors combined with RT and anti-angiogenic agents was 59% (95% CI: 48-70%), whereas the disease control rate and complete remission rate were 92% (95% CI: 81-103%) and 48% (95% CI: 35-61%), respectively. Moreover, the meta-analysis showed that compared with triple-regimen, monotherapy or dual-combination treatment did not improve overall survival (hazard ratio = 0.499, 95% CI: 0.399-0.734) and progression-free survival (hazard ratio = 0.522, 95% CI: 0.352-0.774). The pooled rate of grade 3 to 4 AEs was 26.9% (95% CI: 7.8%-45.9), and the common AEs to triple therapy included leukopenia (25%), thrombocytopenia (23.8%), fatigue (23.2%), gastrointestinal discomfort (22%), increased alanine aminotransferase (22%), and neutropenia (21.4%).

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of solid tumors, PD1/PDL1 inhibitors combined with RT and anti-angiogenic drugs achieved a positive response and better survival benefits than monotherapy or dual therapy. In addition, combination therapy is tolerable and safe.

REGISTRATION

PROSPERO ID: CRD42022371433.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Safety and feasibility of toripalimab plus lenvatinib with or without radiotherapy in advanced BTC

Background

Toripalimab shows antitumor efficacy in cholangiocarcinoma. Radiotherapy (RT) may enhance systemic responses of PD-1 inhibitors and lenvatinib. This study was designed to assess the safety and feasibility of toripalimab plus lenvatinib with or without RT in advanced BTC.

Methods

This study involved 88 patients with advanced BTC receiving toripalimab plus lenvatinib with or without RT from the clinical trials (NCT03892577). Propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1) analysis was used to balance potential bias. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs) were evaluated.

Results

After PSM, the final analysis included 40 patients: 20 receiving toripalimab plus lenvatinib without RT (NRT); 20 receiving toripalimab plus lenvatinib with RT. The AEs were more frequent in the RT group than in the NRT group without treatment-associated mortality. The addition of RT did not cause specific AEs. The median PFS was significantly longer with RT (10.8 versus 4.6 months, p<0.001). The median OS was 13.7 months with RT versus 9.2 months in the NRT group (p=0.008). The ORR was 35% (95% CI: 12.1-57.9) in the RT group versus 20% (95% CI: 0.8-39.2) in the NRT group.

Conclusions

The addition of RT may enhance the efficacy of toripalimab plus lenvatinib. Toripalimab plus lenvatinib with RT have a good safety profile without an increase in specific toxicities in advanced BTC patients.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

Efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization plus antiangiogenic- targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus in the real world

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of a triple therapy that comprises transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), antiangiogenic-targeted therapy, and programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors in a real-world cohort of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT).

Methods

Consecutive patients treated with TACE combined with antiangiogenic therapy and PD-1 inhibitors at the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital between June 2019 and May 2021 were enrolled. The baseline characteristics and treatment course of the patients were recorded. The tumor response was evaluated based on the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and HCC-specific modified RECIST (mRECIST). The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

Results

As of the data cutoff on 30 August 2021, the median follow-up time was 10.0 (3.9-28.4) months. A total of 39 eligible patients were included. The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 35.9% and 74.4% according to the RECIST 1.1, and 48.7% and 84.6% according to mRECIST criteria, respectively. The median OS and PFS were 14.0 and 9.2 months, respectively. Moreover, 34 (87.2%) patients experienced at least one treatment-related AE and 8 (20.5%) patients experienced grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs. The most common treatment- and laboratory-related AEs were hypertension (46.2%) and decreased albumin (53.8%), respectively. No treatment-related mortality occurred during the study period.

Conclusions

TACE combined with antiangiogenic-targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors may have promising anticancer activity in unresectable HCC patients with PVTT. AEs were manageable, with no unexpected overlapping toxicities.

Encouraging efficacy of a comprehensive therapy consisting of sintilimab, bevacizumab biosimilar IBI305, hypo-fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and oxaliplatin for a maxillary metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma: A case report and literature review

Oro-maxillo-facial metastasis from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is very rare, and reports on treating maxillary metastasis from HCC are unavailable. Anti-angiogenesis therapy combined with immunotherapy represented by programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) or its ligand (PD-L1) inhibitor has become the standard treatment of advanced HCC. However, integrating chemoradiotherapy into immunotherapy-bevacizumab combination therapy has not been reported. Here, we presented a Chinese woman with maxillary metastasis from HCC who achieved a nearly complete response (CR) to a quadruple treatment scheme consisting of a PD-1 monoclonal antibody (sintilimab), bevacizumab biosimilar IBI305, hypo-fractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy (hfIMRT), and concurrent oxaliplatin. This comprehensive treatment is an innovative and effective therapy for advanced HCC.

2022 KLCA-NCC Korea practice guidelines for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer worldwide and the fourth most common cancer among men in South Korea, where the prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection is high in middle and old age. The current practice guidelines will provide useful and sensible advice for the clinical management of patients with HCC. A total of 49 experts in the fields of hepatology, oncology, surgery, radiology, and radiation oncology from the Korean Liver Cancer Association-National Cancer Center Korea Practice Guideline Revision Committee revised the 2018 Korean guidelines and developed new recommendations that integrate the most up-to-date research findings and expert opinions. These guidelines provide useful information and direction for all clinicians, trainees, and researchers in the diagnosis and treatment of HCC.

PD-1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic therapy with or without intensity-modulated radiotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A propensity score matching study

Background

Whether intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) can enhance the efficacy of the programmed death (PD)-1 inhibitors combined with anti-angiogenic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unclear. Therefore, we conducted this multicenter retrospective study to investigate the efficacy of the combination of PD-1 inhibitors with anti-angiogenic therapy and IMRT.

Methods

From April 2019 to March 2022, a total of 197 patients with HCC [combination of PD-1 inhibitors with anti-angiogenic therapy and IMRT (triple therapy group), 54; PD-1 inhibitors plus anti-angiogenic therapy (control group), 143] were included in our study. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to identify two groups with similar baselines. The objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) of the two groups were compared before and after matching.

Results

Prior to PSM, the triple therapy group had higher ORR (42.6% vs 24.5%, P = 0.013) and more superior median OS (mOS) (20.1 vs 13.3 months, P = 0.009) and median PFS (mPFS) (8.7 vs 5.4 months, P = 0.001) than the control group. Following PSM, the triple therapy group still exhibited better mPFS (8.7 vs 5.4 months, P = 0.013) and mOS (18.5 vs 12.6 months, P = 0.043) than the control group. However, the ORR of the two groups was similar (40% vs 25%, P = 0.152). No significant difference was observed in the treatment-related adverse events between the two groups (P &lt; 0.05 for all).

Conclusions

The combination of PD-1 inhibitors with anti-angiogenic therapy and IMRT for HCC is a promising regimen.

PD-L1 expression on circulating tumor cells can be a predictive biomarker to PD-1 inhibitors combined with radiotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Aim

A programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor coupled with radiotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy is a potential therapeutic strategy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to determine if circulating tumor cells (CTCs) positive for programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) could be employed as a predictive biomarker in HCC patients receiving triple therapy.

Methods

In this study, HCC patients received a PD-1 inhibitor in combination with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and antiangiogenic therapy. Following IMRT, the PD-1 inhibitor was administrated once every 3 weeks, while the antiangiogenic drug was given once a day. Treatment was continued until the disease progressed. Two mL of peripheral blood was collected at baseline, 1 month, and 3 months after treatment for CTC enrichment using the CytoSorter^® system with a CytoSorter™ CTC PD-L1 Kit (Watson Biotech., China).

Result

A total of 47 HCC patients receiving the triple therapy were enrolled in this study. Patients with < 2 PD-L1⁺ CTCs at baseline had a higher objective response rate (ORR) and longer overall survival (OS) than those with ≥ 2 PD-L1⁺ CTCs (56.5% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.007; not reach vs. 10.8 months, p = 0.001, respectively). The count of PD-L1⁺ CTCs was found to be an independent predictive biomarker of OS. Furthermore, the objective response was more likely to be achieved in patients with a dynamic decrease in PD-L1⁺ CTC counts at 1 month after treatment.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated that PD-L1⁺ CTCs could be a predictive biomarker for HCC patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors in combination with IMRT and antiangiogenic therapy.

Tumor vessel normalization and immunotherapy in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is a common malignant tumor, and patients with GC have a low survival rate due to limited effective treatment methods. Angiogenesis and immune evasion are two key processes in GC progression, and they act synergistically to promote tumor progression. Tumor vascular normalization has been shown to improve the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy, which in turn may be improved through enhanced immune stimulation. Therefore, it may be interesting to identify synergies between immunomodulatory agents and anti-angiogenic therapies in GC. This strategy aims to normalize the tumor microenvironment through the action of the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor while stimulating the immune response through immunotherapy and prolonging the survival of GC patients.

Case Report: Radiotherapy Plus Immunotherapy and Lenvatinib for the Treatment of Recurrent Hepatocellular Carcinoma With a Right Atrium and Inferior Vena Cava Tumor Thrombus

Background

The treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with right atrium (RA) and inferior vena cava (IVC) tumor thrombi is challenging, with the standard treatment being not well established. Immunotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy is a potentially effective treatment for patients with advanced HCC. Here, we described the case of a patient with HCC with RA and IVC tumor thrombi who achieved a successful response from radiotherapy and targeted therapy plus immunotherapy.

Case Summary

A 62-year-old women presented with severe bilateral lower extremity edema identified as recurrent HCC with RA and IVC tumor thrombi based on past medical history and computed tomography. The patient received palliative radiotherapy plus pembrolizumab and lenvatinib treatment and was relieved of disease symptoms of bilateral lower extremity edema. The HCC with RA and IVC tumor thrombi shrunk, and the progression-free survival of this patient was > seven months.

Conclusion

Tumor thrombus-directed radiotherapy plus concurrent immunotherapy and targeted therapy might be a feasible and safe approach for patients with HCC with RA and IVC tumor thrombi.

Proton beam radiotherapy combined with anti-PD1/PDL1 immune checkpoint inhibitors for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Anti-Programmed cell Death protein 1 (Anti-PD1) or Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PDL1) immune checkpoint inhibitors provide treatment options for advanced HCC patients with low response rates. Combination therapy is becoming a major issue to improve the unmet need. Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) could effectively control the local tumor with a low-risk injury to peripheral liver parenchyma. We retrospectively reviewed the patients who have received PBT combined with anti-PD1/PDL1 to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the advanced HCC patients. This study reviewed 29 advanced HCC patients who have received PBT and anti-PD1/PDL1 during 2016 and 2019. All were Child-Pugh A and performance status 0-1. Seventeen patients (58.6%) had extrahepatic spreading. Concurrent PBT started during anti-PD1/PDL1 with a median of 96.6 grays equivalent dose. The PBT field covered all tumors in 13 (44.8%) patients under curative intent. Other patients (55.2%) received palliative PBT that covered only the principal tumors. All patients have completed the concurrent PBT protocol. The median anti-PD1/PDL1 duration was 3.9 months. After a median follow-up of 13.2 months, the rates of 1-year PBT infield tumor control, 1-year outfield tumor control, and overall response were 90.5%, 90.9%, and 61.5%, and 70.8%, 69.2%, and 43.8%, respectively for curative-intent and palliative-control PBT. Complete response was found in 4 (30.8%) curative-intent and 1 (6.3%) palliative-control patients. The median overall progression-free survival was 27.2 months for curative-intent patients and 15.9 months for palliative-control patients. The overall survival was non-reached for both groups. The ALBI grade and Child-Pugh score change at 3-month and 6-month after PBT initiation were nonsignificant. No unexpected adverse event occurred except nine patients (31.0%) had treatment-related adverse events higher than or equal to Grade 3, including 2 (6.9%) had a radiation-induced liver injury. PBT combined with anti-PD1/PDL1 was safe without unexpected adverse events. The concurrent therapy could effectively treat advanced HCC through sustained local tumor necrosis and effective systemic tumor control for the patients who received curative-intent or palliative-control PBT combined with anti-PD1/PDL1.

Effects of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Plus PD-1 Inhibitors for Patients With Transarterial Chemoembolization Refractory

Background and Aims

Patients with intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who are refractory to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) have a poor prognosis. This study aimed to explore whether stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) combined with PD-1 inhibitors could improve the clinical outcomes of such patients.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients with intermediate-stage HCC who were diagnosed with TACE refractoriness between January 2019 and December 2020 in the Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital and the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. The patients were divided into two groups: (1) those who switched from TACE to receive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) combined with PD-1 inhibitors; (2) those who continued TACE treatment and added PD-1 inhibitors. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and tumour response were assessed in both groups after becoming refractory to TACE treatment.

Results

Of the seventy-six patients included in this study, the median PFS was 19.6 months in the SBRT-IO group (n=31) and 10.1 months in the TACE-IO group (n=45, p<0.05). The SBRT-IO group also had a significantly higher OS than the TACE-IO group (p<0.05). The objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were also better in the SBRT-IO group (ORR, 71.0% vs. 15.6%, OR=8.483, 95% CI 3.319-21.680, P < 0.001; DCR, 80.6% vs. 31.1%, OR=9.226, 95% CI 3.096-27.493, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

SBRT combined with a PD-1 inhibitor improves PFS and OS in TACE-refractory patients with intermediate-stage HCC. Therefore, this therapy is a suitable option in cases of TACE treatment failure.

Neoadjuvant approaches in hepatocellular carcinoma: There's no time like the present

Hepatocellular carcinoma remains a lethal malignancy and is an increasingly common cause of cancer death worldwide. Curative-intent surgical resection remains the standard of care for eligible patients, yet outcomes remain poor for many patients, with most patients experiencing recurrence in the five years after resection. There is currently significant interest in utilizing locoregional and systemic therapies - in both the neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings - to increase the chance of cure. This review article appraises the existing literature and current clinical trial landscape of neoadjuvant therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Prognostic significance of albumin-bilirubin score in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing combined immunotherapy and radiotherapy

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to explore the prognostic value of albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) scores in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

Patients with unresectable HCC receiving combined ICI and RT (July 2018 to February 2021) were retrospectively enrolled and analysed. Cox regression modelling was implemented to identify prognostic factors. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Survival was compared using log-rank tests.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients were enrolled. The median follow-up was 16.5 months (range: 6.7-29.9). The objective response rate (ORR) was 28.9%, including complete response in three (7.9%) patients. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.6 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 3.2-8.0), and the median overall survival (OS) was 12.9 months (95% CI: 8.3-17.6). In the multivariate Cox regression analysis, ALBI score and age were identified as independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS. Patients with grade 1 ALBI scores who were ≥53 years of age (the low-risk group) had statistically significantly higher ORRs (50.0% vs. 13.6%) and prolonged median PFS (15.3 vs. 2.7 months) and OS (not reached vs. 10.1 months). Grade 3 haematological toxicities and/or liver function abnormalities occurred in 15 (39.5%) patients; treatment was not interrupted. No grade 4 or higher side effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

Combined ICI and RT is an effective modality for treating unresectable HCC with moderate side effects. ALBI scores merits consideration when applying this combined treatment modality. These results should be validated within large cohort studies.

First-Line Immunochemotherapy Versus Palliative Chemotherapy Plus Definitive Radiation Therapy for de novo Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

The combined use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with palliative chemotherapy (PCT) is a promising first-line treatment for de novo metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (mNPC). However, the efficacy of ICIs with PCT vs PCT with definitive radiation therapy (DRT) remain unclear.

METHODS

Patients with mNPC who received first-line immunochemotherapy (ICI + PCT) or PCT + DRT were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to balance potential confounders between patients who did and did not undergo DRT (at a ratio of 1:1). Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the 2 groups using a log-rank test and Cox proportional hazard model.

RESULTS

Among all participants, 149 received ICI + PCT. After PSM, 149 patients were included in the PCT + DRT group. First-line immunochemotherapy was associated with significantly improved PFS (median 9.0 months vs 12.0 months, P < .001) and OS (median 12.5 months vs 19.9 months, P < .001). Subgroup analysis revealed that tumor response to immunochemotherapy, metastatic organs, and number of metastatic sites potentially affected the efficacy of DRT after first-line immunochemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Compared with PCT + DRT, first-line immunochemotherapy was associated with improved PFS and OS in patients with mNPC but not in patients with unfavorable tumor response and metastasis involving the liver, distant nodes, or multiple sites.