The Prediction Potential of the Pretreatment Lung Immune Prognostic Index for the Therapeutic Outcomes of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Solid Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Prognostic value of lung immune prognostic index in non-small cell lung cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: a meta-analysis

Background and Purpose

Until now, it has been difficult to accurately predict the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A novel indicator, the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI), has shown relatively high prognostic value in patients with solid cancer. Therefore, this study aimed to further identify the association between LIPI and the survival of patients with NSCLC who receive immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Methods

Several electronic databases were searched for available publications up to April 23, 2023. Immunotherapy outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Subgroup analysis based on the study design and comparison of the LIPI was conducted.

Results

In this meta-analysis, 21 studies with 9,010 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that elevated LIPI was significantly associated with poor OS (HR = 2.50, 95% CI:2.09-2.99, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR = 1.77, 95% CI:1.64-1.91, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses stratified by study design (retrospective vs. prospective) and comparison of LIPI (1 vs. 0, 2 vs. 0, 1-2 vs. 0, 2 vs. 1 vs. 0, 2 vs. 0-1 and 2 vs. 1) showed similar results.

Conclusion

LIPI could serve as a novel and reliable prognostic factor in NSCLC treated with ICIs, and elevated LIPI predicts worse prognosis.

Prognosis stratification of cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors through lung immune prognostic index: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

Although numerous studies have reported the prognostic value of the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), the prognostic value of the LIPI in a pancancer setting remains unclear.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was conducted until July 2023 across the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases to identify relevant studies evaluating the prognostic value of the LIPI in cancer patients treated with ICIs. The outcomes were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). We described and compared the pooled outcomes by stratifying the patients based on different groupings of LIPI (good vs. intermediate [0 vs. 1], good vs. poor [0 vs. 2], and good vs. intermediate / poor [0 vs. 1 + 2]).

RESULTS

A total of 9959 patients in 35 studies were included. A higher score of LIPI was associated with impaired OS. The pooled HRs were 1.69 (95% CI: 1.55-1.85, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 1), 3.03 (95% CI: 2.53-3.63, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 2), and 2.38 (95% CI: 1.97-2.88, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 1 + 2). A higher LIPI score was associated with shorter PFS. The pooled HRs were 1.41 (95% CI: 1.31-1.52, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 1), 2.23 (95% CI: 1.87-2.66, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 2), and 1.65 (95% CI: 1.46-1.86, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 1 + 2). Similarly, a higher LIPI score was associated with a lower ORR. The pooled ORs were 0.63 (95% CI: 0.54-0.75, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 1) and 0.38 (95% CI: 0.29-0.50, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 2). A higher LIPI score was associated with a lower DCR. The pooled ORs were 0.47 (95% CI: 0.35-0.61, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 1) and 0.19 (95% CI: 0.12-0.30, p < 0.001; 0 vs. 2).

CONCLUSION

In patients with NSCLC or other solid tumours, the lung immune prognostic index could robustly stratify the clinical outcomes into three groups among the patients who receive ICIs. LIPI is a low-cost, simple, accessible, and accurate prognostic tool in a pancancer setting and it may contribute to the evaluation of risk stratification in patients treated with ICIs.

Predictors of Immunotherapy Efficacy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Lung Immune Prognostic Index and Immune-Related Toxicity

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been proposed as the standard first-line and subsequent treatment for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study analyzed whether patients with good lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) have a better response to ICIs and the relationship between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and response in clinical practice.

Methods

This was an observational, retrospective, single-center study. Patients with stage IV NSCLC between 2016 and 2021 were included in the study. Toxicity was assessed according to The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Response assessment was performed according to RECIST 2.0 and immuno-related criteria. Descriptive and survival analyses were conducted. Degree of toxicity and response to treatment (based on treatment and histology) were assessed. LIPI and response were assessed. LIPI included dNLR (absolute neutrophil count/(white blood cell count - absolute neutrophil count)) ≥ 3 and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) greater than the upper limit of normal. Patients were stratified into good (G), intermediate (I), and poor (P) prognostic groups.

Results

A total of 168 patients were included (130 men and 38 women, mean age 64.3 years). ICI use in the first- or second-line treatment was 65% and 35%, respectively. Fifteen (9%) patients showed complete response (CR), 50 (30%) showed partial response (PR), 39 (22%) had stable disease (SD), 45 (28%) had progressive disease (PD), and 19 (11%) were not evaluated (NE). Patients with good prognostic LIPI (dNLR < 3 and normal LDH levels) showed a better response. Progression-free survival (PFS) was 19 months in G, 6 months in I, and 2 months in P. Overall survival (OS) was 27 months in G, 8 months in I, and 3 months in P. One hundred fourteen patients died (56% G, 76% I, 93% P). Patients with adenocarcinoma were 116 (77 with irAEs G1-4 (13 CR, 31 PR, 21 SD, eight PD, and four NE)), and without were 39 (three PR, six SD, 21 PD, and nine NE). Fifty-two patients had squamous carcinoma (27 with irAEs G1-4 (two CR, 12 PR, nine SD, and four PD)), and 25 did not (four PR, three SD, 12 PD, and six NE)). IrAEs appearance was observed in longer PFS (19 vs. 2 months) and OS (27 vs. 4 months; P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

LIPI was a positive predictor of response to ICI. The presence of irAEs is associated with a better immune response. In contrast, the absence of toxicity predicted a worse prognosis.

Inflammation‑based prognostic markers of metastatic pancreatic cancer using real‑world data in Japan: The Tokushukai REAl‑world Data (TREAD) project

Inflammation-based prognostic markers based on a combination of blood-based parameters, including the modified Glasgow prognostic score (mGPS), have been associated with clinical outcomes in patients with various types of cancer. The present study aimed to evaluate and compare the accuracy of these previously reported markers in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy. A total of 846 patients were identified between April 2010 and March 2020 as part of a nationwide real-world study from 46 Tokushukai medical group hospitals in Japan. Blood laboratory data collected within 14 days of starting first-line chemotherapy assessed 17 inflammation-based prognostic markers. Information from patients with no missing data was used to compare the accuracy and performance of the inflammation-based prognostic markers. A total of 487 patients were eligible for this supplemental analysis. The 17 inflammation-based markers demonstrated significant prognostic value. Among them, the concordance rate with overall survival (OS) was highest for mGPS. The median OS time of patients with mGPS 0, 1 and 2 was 8.2, 6.0 and 2.9 months, respectively. Compared with mGPS 0, mGPS 1 and 2 showed hazard ratios of 1.39 (95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.81) and 2.63 (2.00-3.45), respectively. The present real-world data analysis showed that various previously reported inflammation-based markers had significant prognostic value in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Among these markers, the mGPS demonstrated the highest level of accuracy. This trial has been registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry as UMIN000050590 on April 1, 2023.

Prognostic Value of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index on Recurrence after Radical Surgery for High-Risk Renal Cell Carcinoma

With emerging options in immediate postoperative settings for high-risk renal cell carcinoma (hrRCC), further risk stratification may be relevant for informed decision making. Balancing the benefits and drawbacks of adjuvant immunotherapy is recommended. We aimed to evaluate the effects of the lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) in this setting. This bi-institutional retrospective study recruited 235 patients who underwent radical surgery for hrRCC between 2004 and 2021. LIPI scores were calculated based on the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio and lactate dehydrogenase levels. The association between LIPI scores and local or distant recurrence was analyzed, along with other possible clinical factors. The median recurrence-free survival (RFS) period was 36.4 months. Based on the LIPI scores, 119, 91, and 25 patients were allocated to the good, intermediate, and poor groups, respectively. The RFS was significantly correlated with the LIPI scores, and the 36 month survival rates were 67.3, 36.2, and 11.0% in the good, intermediate, and poor groups, respectively. In the multivariate model, the LIPI independently predicted the RFS, along with symptoms at diagnosis, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, pT status, pN status, and tumor grade. The C-index of the LIPI in predicting RFS was 0.63, and prediction accuracy improved with the addition of the LIPI to both GRade, Age, Nodes, Tumor, and the UCLA Integrated Staging System. Conclusively, the LIPI can be a significant prognostic biomarker for predicting hrRCC recurrence, particularly for identifying the highest-risk cohort.

Thyroid dysfunction induced by anti-PD-1 therapy is associated with a better progression-free survival in patients with advanced carcinoma

PURPOSE

Thyroid dysfunction is the most common immune-related adverse event during anti-programmed cell death 1 (anti-PD-1) therapy. In this study, we monitored patients with advanced malignant tumors who received anti-PD-1 therapy to observe the characteristic of anti-PD-1 therapy-induced thyroid dysfunction and its correlation with prognosis.

METHODS

Patients with advanced carcinoma treated with anti-PD-1 therapy were evaluated for thyroid function at baseline and after treatment initiation from August 2020 to March 2022. Seventy-three patients were finally included in the study.

RESULTS

Among these patients, 19 (26.03%) developed thyroid dysfunction after receiving anti-PD-1 therapy. Primary hypothyroidism and thyrotoxicosis were the most common clinical manifestation. Anti-PD-1-induced thyroid dysfunction occurred 63 (26-131) days after administration; thyrotoxicosis appeared earlier than primary hypothyroidism. In Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, the progression-free survival (PFS) of the thyroid dysfunction group was better than that of the no thyroid dysfunction group (227 (95% confidence interval (CI) 50.85-403.15) days vs 164 (95% CI 77.76-250.24) days, p = 0.026). Male patients had better PFS than female patients (213 (95% CI 157.74-268.26) days vs 74 (95% CI 41.23-106.77) days, p = 0.031). In cox proportional hazards regression model, anti-PD-1-induced thyroid dysfunction remained an independent predictor of better PFS (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.339(0.136-0.848), p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

Thyroid dysfunction is a common immune-related adverse events in advanced cancer patients treated with anti-PD-1 therapy and predicts a better prognosis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was retrospectively registered with Trial ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05593744) on October 25, 2022.

Lung immune prognostic index‑based nomogram for recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after postoperative adjuvant TACE

BACKGROUND

Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), one of the most commonly used postoperative adjuvant therapy for HCC, has achieved satisfactory outcomes. This study aimed to explore the prognostic value of lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) and develop a novel nomogram for recurrence-free survival (RFS) of HCC patients received postoperative adjuvant TACE (PA-TACE).

METHODS

The prognostic value of LIPI was evaluated by C-index, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, and Kaplan-Meier survival curve. An effective nomogram based on preoperative prognostic factors was established from multivariate analysis and validated in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

The ROC and survival analysis demonstrated that the LIPI exhibited better prediction performance of HCC recurrence than other inflammatory biomarkers. According to univariate and multivariate analysis, LIPI, followed by AFP, MVI and age, were significant independent predictors for HCC recurrence and were utilized to construct the nomogram. The C-indexes of the nomogram were 0.746 (95% CI 0.721-0.770) and 0.738 (95% CI 0.701-0.775) in the training and validation cohort, respectively. The AUCs for the 1-, 2-, and 3-year RFS were 0.799, 0.867 and 0.884 in the training cohort and 0.798, 0.779 and 0.770 in the validation cohort, respectively. The calibration curves presented good consistencies. Moreover, compared with the LIPI and other clinical staging system, the established nomogram presented better prognostic performance.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative LIPI might be a powerful predictor for RFS in HCC patients received PA-TACE. The LIPI-based nomogram could further effectively predict the risk of recurrence and help clinicians formulate personalized follow-up strategies and adjuvant therapy to improve patient outcomes.

Association between lung immune prognostic index and survival of patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma treated with pembrolizumab

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Lung immune prognostic index score (LIPI), calculated using the derived neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and lactate dehydrogenase level, is reported for use in numerous malignancies, while its role on metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) treated with pembrolizumab remains limited. We aimed to investigate association between LIPI and outcomes in this setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 90 patients with mUC treated with pembrolizumab at four institutions. The associations between three LIPI groups and progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rates (ORRs) or disease control rates (DCRs) were assessed.

RESULTS

Based on the LIPI, good, intermediate, and poor groups were observed in 41 (45.6%), 33 (36.7%), and 16 (17.8%) patients, respectively. The PFS and OS were significantly correlated with the LIPI (median PFS: 21.2 vs. 7.0 vs. 4.0 months, p = 0.001; OS: 44.3 vs. 15.0 vs. 4.2 months, p < 0.001 in the LIPI good vs. intermediate vs. poor groups). Multivariable analysis further revealed that LIPI good (vs. intermediate or poor, hazard ratio: 0.44, p = 0.004) and performance status = 0 (p = 0.015) were independent predictors of a longer PFS. In addition, LIPI good (hazard ratio: 0.29, p < 0.001) were shown to be associated with a longer OS together with performance status = 0 (p < 0.001). The ORRs tended to be different among patients with Good LIPI compared with Poor, and DCRs were significantly different among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

LIPI, a simple and convenient score, could be a significant prognostic biomarker of OS, PFS, and DCRs for mUC treated with pembrolizumab.