Targeted Sequencing of Ascites and Peritoneal Washing Fluid of Patients With Gastrointestinal Cancers and Their Clinical Applications and Limitations

Molecular diagnosis for detecting KRAS mutation in peritoneal washing fluid of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Positive peritoneal washing cytology is an indicator of poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC); however, its sensitivity is relatively low. This study evaluated the performance of peptide nucleic acid (PNA)-directed PCR clamping as a molecular-based peritoneal washing cytology for sensitive detection of KRAS mutation in PDAC. Intraoperative peritoneal washing fluid (IPWF) obtained from patients with PDAC who underwent surgery was analyzed. PNA-directed PCR clamping was performed on DNA extracted from IPWF. Among 54 patients enrolled, threshold cycle (Ct) was significantly lower in patients with positive peritoneal washing cytology than in those with negative peritoneal washing cytology (P < 0.001) and in patients with peritoneal dissemination than in those without peritoneal dissemination (P < 0.01). The optimal Ct cut-off to predict KRAS mutations in IPWF was 36.42 based on a receiver operating characteristic curve. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for molecular diagnosis were 100%, 80.0%, and 85.2%, respectively. Peritoneal dissemination recurrence was significantly more frequent in patients with a positive molecular diagnosis than in those with a negative diagnosis (38.9 vs. 8.0%, P = 0.013). The genomic approach might be clinically valuable for a more precise tumor cell detection in IPWF.

Minimally Invasive, Maximally Effective: The Power of Precision Cytoanalysis on Effusion Samples-A Comprehensive Exploration from Traditional Methods to Innovative Approaches

Precision medicine translates through molecular assays and in minimally invasive diagnosis, evident in analyses of effusions that serve therapeutic and diagnostic purposes. This cost-effective and low-risk approach provides advantages, playing a pivotal role in late-stage oncology and frequently standing as the primary resource for cancer diagnosis and treatment pathways. This article outlines the workflow for managing serous fluid and explores how cytology effusion analysis extends beyond immunocytological diagnosis. Combined with current molecular tests it showcases the potential to be a skillful tool in precision cytopathology.

Role of Diagnostic Laparoscopy During Pancreatic Cancer Surgery in the Modern Era

INTRODUCTION

Despite improvements in preoperative image resolution, approximately 10% of curative-intent resection attempts for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma are aborted at the time of operation. To avoid nontherapeutic laparotomy, many surgeons perform intraoperative diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) to identify radiographically occult metastatic disease. There are no consensus guidelines regarding DL in pancreatic cancer. The goal of this study is to investigate the efficacy of same-procedure DL at avoiding nontherapeutic laparotomy.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review was performed from 2016 to 2022, identifying 196 patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma who were taken to the operating room for open curative-intent resection. Patient demographic, tumor characteristic, treatment, and outcome data were abstracted. Univariate and multivariate Cox hazard ratio analysis was performed to investigate risk factors for overall survival and recurrence-free survival. Number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated to identify number of DLs necessary to avoid one nontherapeutic laparotomy.

RESULTS

Curative-intent resection was achieved in 161 (82.1%) patients. One hundred twenty six (64.0%) patients received DL prior to resection and DL identified metastatic disease in three (2.4%) patients with an NNT of 42. NNT of DL in a subgroup analysis performed on clinically high-risk patients (defined by preoperative or preneoadjuvant therapy carbohydrate antigen 19-9 > 500 U/mL) is 11. Receipt of DL did not prolong operative times in patients receiving pancreaticoduodenectomy when accounting for completed versus aborted resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Although intraoperative DL is a short procedure with minimal morbidity, these data demonstrate that same-procedure DL has potential efficacy in avoiding nontherapeutic laparotomy only in a subgroup of clinically high-risk patients. Focus should remain on optimizing preoperative patient selection and further investigating novel diagnostic markers predictive of occult metastatic disease.

Next‑generation sequencing to identify genetic mutations in pancreatic cancer using intraoperative peritoneal washing fluid

The efficacy of next-generation sequencing (NGS) of tumor-derived DNA from intraoperative peritoneal washing fluid (IPWF) of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) who intend to undergo curative resection remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether genomic mutations in tumor-derived DNA from IPWF samples of patients with PDAC who intend to undergo curative resection could be detected using NGS. A total of 12 such patients were included in this study. Cytology of IPWF (CY) was assessed and NGS of genomic tumor-derived DNA from the IPWF was performed to determine whether genomic mutations could be detected in these patient samples. A total of 2 patients (16.7%) had a CY(+) status and 1 patient (8.3%) showed intraoperative macro-peritoneal dissemination; 11 patients underwent radical surgery. Actionable gene alterations were detected in 8 (80.0%) out of the 10 patients with CY(-) status based on NGS of IPWF samples, and 3 (37.5%) patients among those with actionable gene mutations identified from IPWF samples underwent peritoneal dissemination after surgery within ~12 months. The most common genomic mutation was in KRAS (9 patients, 75.0%), followed by TP53 (3 patients, 25.0%), SMAD4 (1 patient, 8.3%) and CDKN2A (1 patient, 8.3%). These findings indicated that the genomic mutations identified in tumor-derived DNA from IPWF samples of patients with PDAC with a CY(-) status who intend to undergo curative resection are potential biomarkers for predicting the recurrence of early peritoneal dissemination.

Techniques of staging laparoscopy and peritoneal fluid assessment in gastric cancer: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Staging laparoscopy for gastric cancer is recommended to assess the tumor's locoregional extension and exclude peritoneal disease. As there is no consensus on optimizing the procedure's diagnostic accuracy, we aimed to systematically review the literature on operative techniques, followed by peritoneal lavage fluid assessment in gastric cancer patients. Specifically, we sought to indicate the most common characteristics of the procedure and cytological evaluation.

METHODS

This study was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The protocol for this systematic review was registered on PROSPERO database (CRD: 42022306746). On September 2022, a search was carried out using Embase, Medline ALL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science Core Collection.

RESULTS

The search identified 1632 studies on staging laparoscopy and 2190 studies on peritoneal fluid assessment. Some 212 studies were included. Open Hasson was the method of choice in accessing the peritoneal cavity in 65% of the studies, followed by establishing a pneumoperitoneum at 10-12 mmHg in 52% of reports. Most frequently, the patient was positioned supine (70%), while a 30° scope and three ports were used to assess the peritoneal cavity clockwise (72%, 77%, and 85%, respectively). Right and left upper abdomen quadrants were the predominant area of laparoscopic exploration (both 65%), followed by the primary tumor region (54%), liver and pelvis (both 30%), and small bowel and spleen (19% and 17%, respectively). Regions of peritoneal lavage and aspiration were limited to the pelvis (50%), followed by right and left upper abdomen quadrants (37.5% and 50%, respectively). No studies compared different methods of operative techniques or analysis of ascites/fluid.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates a high heterogeneity in the technique of staging laparoscopy and peritoneal fluid assessment in gastric cancer patients. Further research and initiatives to reach a consensus on the standardization of the procedure are warranted.

Anti-Tumor Immunogenicity of the Oncolytic Virus CF33-hNIS-antiPDL1 against Ex Vivo Peritoneal Cells from Gastric Cancer Patients

We studied the immunotherapeutic potential of CF33-hNIS-antiPDL1 oncolytic virus (OV) against gastric cancer with peritoneal metastasis (GCPM). We collected fresh malignant ascites (MA) or peritoneal washings (PW) during routine paracenteses and diagnostic laparoscopies from GC patients (n = 27). Cells were analyzed for cancer cell markers and T cells, or treated with PBS, CF33-GFP, or CF33-hNIS-antiPDL1 (MOI = 3). We analyzed infectivity, replication, cytotoxicity, CD107α upregulation of CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, CD274 (PD-L1) blockade of cancer cells by virus-encoded anti-PD-L1 scFv, and the release of growth factors and cytokines. We observed higher CD45-/large-size cells and lower CD8+ T cell percentages in MA than PW. CD45-/large-size cells were morphologically malignant and expressed CD274 (PD-L1), CD252 (OX40L), and EGFR. CD4+ and CD8+ T cells did not express cell surface exhaustion markers. Virus infection and replication increased cancer cell death at 15 h and 48 h. CF33-hNIS-antiPDL1 treatment produced functional anti-PD-L1 scFv, which blocked surface PD-L1 binding of live cancer cells and increased CD8+CD107α+ and CD4+CD107α+ T cell percentages while decreasing EGF, PDGF, soluble anti-PD-L1, and IL-10. CF33-OVs infect, replicate in, express functional proteins, and kill ex vivo GCPM cells with immune-activating effects. CF33-hNIS-antiPDL1 displays real potential for intraperitoneal GCPM therapy.

Malignant ascites in pancreatic cancer: Pathophysiology, diagnosis, molecular characterization, and therapeutic strategies

Malignant ascites is the accumulation of fluid in the peritoneum as a result of advanced cancer and often signifies the terminal phase of the disease. Management of malignant ascites remains a clinical challenge as symptom palliation is the current standard of cure. Previously, studies examining malignant ascites largely focused on ovarian and gastric cancer. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in research on malignant ascites in pancreatic cancer. Malignant ascites is usually diagnosed based on positive cytology, but cytology is not always diagnostic, indicating the need for novel diagnostic tools and biomarkers. This review aims to summarize the current understanding of malignant ascites in pancreatic cancer and the recent advances in the molecular characterization of malignant ascites fluid from patients with pancreatic cancer including analysis of soluble molecules and extracellular vesicles. Current standard of care treatment options such as paracenteses and diuretics are outlined along with new emerging treatment strategies such as immunotherapy and small-molecule based therapies. New potential investigative directions resulting from these studies are also highlighted.

"SMART" cytology: The next generation cytology for precision diagnosis

Cytology plays an important role in diagnosing and managing human diseases, especially cancer, as it is often a simple, low cost yet effective, and non-invasive or minimally invasive diagnostic tool. However, traditional morphology-based cytology practice has limitations, especially in the era of precision diagnosis. Recently there have been tremendous efforts devoted to apply computational tools and to perform molecular analysis on cytological samples for a variety of clinical purposes. Now is probably the appropriate juncture to integrate morphology, machine learning, and molecular analysis together and transform cytology from a morphology-driven practice to the next level - "SMART" Cytology. In this article we will provide a rather brief review of the relevant works for computational analysis on cytology samples, focusing on single-cell-based multiplex quantitative analysis of biomarkers, and introduce the conceptual framework of "SMART (Single cell, Multiplex, AI-driven, and Real Time)" Cytology.

Soluble factors in malignant ascites promote the metastatic adhesion of gastric adenocarcinoma cells

BACKGROUND

Adenocarcinoma of the proximal stomach is the fastest rising malignancy in North America. It is commonly associated with peritoneal accumulation of malignant ascites (MA), a fluid containing cancer and inflammatory cells and soluble proteins. Peritoneal metastasis (PM) is the most common site of gastric cancer (GC) progression after curative-intent surgery and is the leading cause of death among GC patients.

METHODS/RESULTS

Using a panel of gastric adenocarcinoma cell lines (human: MKN 45, SNU-5; murine: NCC-S1M), we demonstrate that prior incubation of GC cells with MA results in a significant (> 1.7-fold) increase in the number of cells capable of adhering to human peritoneal mesothelial cells (HPMC) (p < 0.05). We then corroborate these findings using an ex vivo PM model and show that MA also significantly enhances the ability of GC cells to adhere to strips of human peritoneum (p < 0.05). Using a multiplex ELISA, we identify MIF and VEGF as consistently elevated across MA samples from GC patients (p < 0.05). We demonstrate that agents that block the effects of MIF or VEGF abrogate the ability of MA to stimulate the adhesion of GC cells to adhere to human peritoneum and promote both ex vivo and in vivo metastases.

CONCLUSION

Agents targeting MIF or VEGF may be relevant to the treatment or prevention of PM in GC patients.

Combinatorial Power of cfDNA, CTCs and EVs in Oncology

Liquid biopsy is a promising technique for clinical management of oncological patients. The diversity of analytes circulating in the blood useable for liquid biopsy testing is enormous. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs), cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and extracellular vesicles (EVs), as well as blood cells and other soluble components in the plasma, were shown as liquid biopsy analytes. A few studies directly comparing two liquid biopsy analytes showed a benefit of one analyte over the other, while most authors concluded the benefit of the additional analyte. Only three years ago, the first studies to examine the value of a characterization of more than two liquid biopsy analytes from the same sample were conducted. We attempt to reflect on the recent development of multimodal liquid biopsy testing in this review. Although the analytes and clinical purposes of the published multimodal studies differed significantly, the additive value of the analytes was concluded in almost all projects. Thus, the blood components, as liquid biopsy reservoirs, are complementary rather than competitive, and orthogonal data sets were even shown to harbor synergistic effects. The unmistakable potential of multimodal liquid biopsy testing, however, is dampened by its clinical utility, which is yet to be proven, the lack of methodical standardization and insufficiently mature reimbursement, logistics and data handling.