Efficacy and Response Biomarkers of Apatinib in the Treatment of Malignancies in China: A Review

The efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with S-1 for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Advanced gastric cancer (AGC) that does not respond to first-line therapy poses a challenge to clinical management. The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with S-1 in second-line and above treatment of AGC.

METHODS

Cochrane Library, Science Direct, EMBASE, PubMed, and CNKI were searched for randomized controlled trial until August 2023. Only patients who met "Standardized Diagnosis and Treatment Guide for Gastric Cancer" were included in the study. The accurate data and distinguishing between follow-up time and drug dose were extracted to reduce heterogeneity and the risk of bias of the included trials was evaluated according to the Cochrane Handbook. Finally, the survival benefit of the treatment was evaluated based on clinical response rate, survival period, biochemical index, and adverse event occurrence in the trial.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis included 29 randomized controlled trials involving 2149 participants. Statistically significant increases in clinical effective rate (odds ratios = 2.61, 95% confidence interval [2.13-3.20], P < .00001) and disease control rate (odds ratios = 3.16, 95% confidence interval [2.54-3.94], P < .00001) were found when apatinib combined with S-1, and also had obvious advantages in reducing tumor markers and regulating immune factors. In addition, apatinib combined with S-1 significantly increased the risk of hypertension but reduced damage to liver function, while the improvement of other adverse events was not pronounced.

DISCUSSION

Apatinib combined with S-1 is more effective and safe for second-line and above treatment of AGC. This study minimized the conclusion bias caused by the basic data sources, but more high-quality studies are still needed to validate these conclusions.

Apatinib plus chemotherapy for non-metastatic osteosarcoma: a retrospective cohort study

Background

Effective adjuvant therapy for osteosarcoma is necessary for improved outcomes. Previous studies demonstrated that apatinib plus doxorubicin-based chemotherapy may improve the efficacy of neoadjuvant therapy. This study aimed to clarify the effectiveness and safety of apatinib plus doxorubicin and cisplatin (AP) as neoadjuvant therapy for osteosarcoma.

Methods

The clinical data of osteosarcoma patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and surgery between August 2016 and April 2022 were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: the apatinib plus AP (apatinib + AP) group and the methotrexate, doxorubicin, and cisplatin (MAP) group.

Results

This study included 42 patients with nonmetastatic osteosarcoma (19 and 23 patients in the apatinib + AP and MAP groups, respectively). The 1- and 2-year disease-free survival rates in the apatinib + AP group were higher than those in the MAP group, but the difference was not significant (P=0.165 and 0.283, respectively). Some adverse events were significantly more common in the apatinib + AP group than in the MAP group, including oral mucositis (grades 3 and 4) (52.6% vs. 17.4%, respectively, P=0.023), limb edema (47.4% vs. 17.4%, respectively, P=0.049), hand-foot syndrome (31.6% vs. 0%, respectively, P=0.005), proteinuria (26.3% vs. 0%, respectively, P=0.014), hypertension (21.1% vs. 0%, respectively, P=0.035), and hypothyroidism (21.1% vs. 0%, respectively, P=0.035). No drug-related deaths occurred. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of postoperative complications between the groups (P>0.05).

Conclusion

The present study suggests that apatinib + AP may be a promising candidate for neoadjuvant therapy for osteosarcoma, warranting further validation in prospective randomized controlled clinical trials with long-term follow-up.

Low-dose apatinib in subjects with renal impairment: A pharmacokinetics study

OBJECTIVE

In patients with renal impairment, we studied apatinib and its major metabolites (M1-1, M1-2, M1-6, and M9-2) for pharmacokinetics.

METHODS

Subjects with different renal functions were given a single oral dose of apatinib mesylate tablets of 250 mg. Pharmacokinetic samples were collected at 1 hour before dosing,0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after dosing. The pharmacokinetic parameters of apatinib and its major metabolites were calculated by noncompartmental analysis.

RESULTS

Comparing PK parameters of the mild or moderate renal impairment group with the healthy group: the geometric mean ratios of maximum observed drug concentration (Cmax), the area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve from time 0 to the final quantifiable time (AUC0-t), and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity (AUC0-inf) were all about one. No significant effect of mild and moderate renal impairment on apatinib pharmacokinetics was observed. Mild and moderate renal impairment was also not observed to have a significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of metabolites M1-1, M1-2, and M1-6. However, mild and moderate renal impairment had a certain increase in exposure to the metabolite M9-2. Considering that M9-2 has no inhibitory effect on protein tyrosine kinase, it has no clinical significance. In addition, the proportion of cumulative excretion of apatinib and its major metabolites was small and almost negligible in all three groups of subjects.

CONCLUSION

Patients with mild and moderate renal impairment do not need to adjust the dose of apatinib when using low dose (250 mg) apatinib.

Small molecule protein kinase inhibitors approved by regulatory agencies outside of the United States

Owing to genetic alterations and overexpression, the dysregulation of protein kinases plays a significant role in the pathogenesis of many autoimmune and neoplastic disorders and protein kinase antagonists have become an important drug target. Although the efficacy of imatinib in the treatment of chronic myelogenous leukemia in the United States in 2001 was the main driver of protein kinase inhibitor drug discovery, this was preceded by the approval of fasudil (a ROCK antagonist) in Japan in 1995 for the treatment of cerebral vasospasm. There are 21 small molecule protein kinase inhibitors that are approved in China, Japan, Europe, and South Korea that are not approved in the United Sates and 75 FDA-approved inhibitors in the United States. Of the 21 agents, eleven target receptor protein-tyrosine kinases, eight inhibit nonreceptor protein-tyrosine kinases, and two block protein-serine/threonine kinases. All 21 drugs are orally bioavailable or topically effective. Of the non-FDA approved drugs, sixteen are prescribed for the treatment of neoplastic diseases, three are directed toward inflammatory disorders, one is used for glaucoma, and fasudil is used in the management of vasospasm. The leading targets of kinase inhibitors approved by both international regulatory agencies and by the FDA are members of the EGFR family, the VEGFR family, and the JAK family. One-third of the 21 internationally approved drugs are not compliant with Lipinski's rule of five for orally bioavailable drugs. The rule of five relies on four parameters including molecular weight, number of hydrogen bond donors and acceptors, and the Log of the partition coefficient.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization plus apatinib with or without camrelizumab for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The evidence of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor and immune checkpoint inhibitor in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was limited. This study aimed to evaluate the role of TACE plus apatinib (TACE + A) and TACE combined with apatinib plus camrelizumab (TACE + AC) in patients with unresectable HCC.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed patients with unresectable HCC who received TACE + A or TACE + AC in 20 centers of China from January 1, 2019 to June 31, 2021. Propensity score matching (PSM) at 1:1 was performed to reduce bias. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 960 eligible patients with HCC were included in the final analysis. After PSM, there were 449 patients in each group, and the baseline characteristics were balanced between two groups. At data cutoff, the median follow-up time was 16.3 (range: 11.9-21.4) months. After PSM, the TACE + AC group showed longer median OS (24.5 vs 18.0 months, p < 0.001) and PFS (10.8 vs 7.7 months, p < 0.001) than the TACE + A group; the ORR (49.9% vs 42.5%, p = 0.002) and DCR (88.4% vs 84.0%, p = 0.003) of the TACE + AC group were also higher than those in the TACE + A group. Fever, pain, hypertension and hand-foot syndrome were the more common TRAEs in two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both TACE plus apatinib and TACE combined with apatinib plus camrelizumab were feasible in patients with unresectable HCC, with manageable safety profiles. Moreover, TACE combined with apatinib plus camrelizumab showed additional benefit.

Efficacy of the low dose apatinib plus deep hyperthermia as third-line or later treatment in HER-2 negative advanced gastric cancer

Aim: To observe the efficacy of the low dose apatinib plus deep hyperthermia as third-line or later treatment for patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) negative advanced gastric cancer. Methods: 80 eligible patients with HER-2 negative advanced gastric cancer admitted to Jingjiang People's Hospital Affiliated with Yangzhou University-from March 2021 to March 2022 were selected, and they were divided into the control group (n = 40, apatinib) and experimental group (n = 40, apatinib plus deep hyperthermia) on the basis of random number table method. The levels of serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were monitored, and the efficacy of the two groups was analyzed by referring to Karnofsky performance status (KPS), overall survival (OS) and disease control rate (DCR) before and after treatment. Results: The levels of CEA, CA199, and VEGF in both groups were lower after treatment than before (p < 0.05), and lower (CEA: 8.85 ± 1.36 vs. 12.87 ± 1.23, CA199: 34.19 ± 4.68 vs. 50.11 ± 5.73, VEGF: 124.8 ± 18.03 vs. 205.9 ± 19.91) in the experimental group than in the control group (p < 0.05). The DCR and KPS of the patients in the experimental group were significantly higher (DCR: 62.50% vs. 40.00%; KPS: 83.25 ± 1.15 vs. 76.25 ± 1.17) than in the control group (p < 0.05). In survival analysis, patients with control group had shorter OS than the experimental group. (median 5.65 vs. 6.50 months; hazard ratio [HR], 1.63 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02-2.60], p = 0.0396). Conclusion: The application of low-dose apatinib plus deep hyperthermia for patients with HER-2 negative gastric cancer who failed second-line treatment should be a promising option.

Clinical progress of anti-angiogenic targeted therapy and combination therapy for gastric cancer

The incidence of gastric cancer is increasing year by year. Most gastric cancers are already in the advanced stage with poor prognosis when diagnosed, which means the current treatment is not satisfactory. Angiogenesis is an important link in the occurrence and development of tumors, and there are multiple anti-angiogenesis targeted therapies. To comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-angiogenic targeted drugs alone and in combination against gastric cancer, we systematically searched and sorted out relevant literature. In this review, we summarized the efficacy and safety of Ramucirumab, Bevacizumab, Apatinib, Fruquintinib, Sorafenib, Sunitinib, Pazopanib on gastric cancer when used alone or in combination based on prospective clinical trials reported in the literature, and sorted response biomarkers. We also summarized the challenges faced by anti-angiogenesis therapy for gastric cancer and available solutions. Finally, the characteristics of the current clinical research are summarized and suggestions and prospects are raised. This review will serve as a good reference for the clinical research of anti-angiogenic targeted drugs in the treatment of gastric cancer.

Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib in the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Refractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Systematic Review

The purpose of this study was to systematically review the current evidence on apatinib and offer a better understanding of its safety and efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients who have not responded to standard chemotherapies. This systematic review was conducted using research from the last 10 years (May 30, 2012, to May 30, 2022) and was obtained from the following databases: PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), ScienceDirect, and Google Scholar. After removing duplicates, screening titles and abstracts, and applying eligibility criteria and quality appraisal, 11 articles were left for this systematic review (one meta-analysis, eight non-randomized studies, and two traditional reviews). Out of the 11 studies, six were on apatinib monotherapy, while three were on apatinib combination therapy. Apatinib has demonstrated efficacy in the monotherapy and combination therapy trials and has exhibited an acceptable safety profile as the adverse events were predominantly graded 1-2 and could be easily managed. Therefore, apatinib is an encouraging candidate for third-line therapy in chemotherapy-refractory mCRC patients. This conclusion should be confirmed and validated by studies with larger, randomized clinical trials to gain better insight and to directly compare the efficacy and safety of apatinib with all current third-line therapies together so that clinicians can easily assess which treatment modality is superior for chemotherapy-refractory mCRC patients.

Apatinib plus vinorelbine versus vinorelbine for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer who failed first/second-line treatment: the NAN trial

While therapies such as chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, sacituzumab govitecan, and PARP inhibitors are available for metastatic TNBC, on disease progression after these therapies, the mainstay of therapy is chemotherapy. Apatinib is a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has promising anti-angiogenesis and antitumor activity for TNBC. We aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding apatinib to chemotherapy in patients with advanced TNBC with failed first/second-line treatment. A total of 66 patients were randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, to receive vinorelbine or vinorelbine with apatinib in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety. 33 received apatinib plus vinorelbine and 32 received vinorelbine (1 was withdrawal). Median PFS was significantly longer in the apatinib plus vinorelbine group than in the vinorelbine group (3.9 months vs. 2.0 months; hazard ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06 to 3.11; P = 0.026). Median OS was 11.5 months with apatinib plus vinorelbine and 9.9 months with vinorelbine (HR,1.01; 95% CI, 0.51 to 1.97; P = 0.985). The ORR was 9.1% in the apatinib plus vinorelbine group and 6.3% in the vinorelbine group (P = 0.667). The most common treatment-related hematologic grade 3–4 adverse events in apatinib plus vinorelbine group, were leukopenia, granulocytopenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. no treatment-related nonhematologic grade 4 adverse events or treatment-related deaths were observed. Collectively, adding apatinib to vinorelbine shows a promising benefit in PFS compared to vinorelbine monotherapy, with an excellent toxicity profile, warranting further exploration.

Comparative efficacy and adverse reactions of apatinib-chemotherapy combinations versus chemotherapy alone for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

Apatinib mesylate is the first small-molecule anti-angiogenic agent that has been shown to be effective and well-tolerated for treatment of advanced gastric cancer, and has shown encouraging efficacy for treatment of advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). However, previous studies reported diverse efficacy and safety results of apatinib for treatment of advanced CRC. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of apatinib plus chemotherapy (trial group) versus chemotherapy alone (control group) for treatment of advanced CRC.

METHODS

A joint search was performed in electronic databases to retrieve randomized clinical trials (RCTs) reporting the efficacy and adverse reactions of apatinib in the treatment of advanced CRC. The pooled survival, treatment responses, and safety were estimated and compared between the trial and control groups.

RESULTS

A total of 7 eligible RCTs involving 539 colorectal cancer patients were enrolled. Meta-analysis showed significantly higher overall response rate (risk ratio (RR) = 1.46, P < 0.00001), disease control rate (RR = 1.24, P < 0.00001), complete response (RR = 1.72, P = 0.01), PR (RR = 1.43, P = 0.001), overall survival (mean difference (MD) = 3.89, P = 0.0006), and progression-free survival (MD = 2.94, P < 0.00001) and lower progressive disease (RR = 0.37, P < 0.00001) in the trial group than in the control group; however, there were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of stable disease (RR = 0.89, P = 0.38) or incidence of adverse reactions (RR = 1.01, P = 0.92).

CONCLUSION

Apatinib plus chemotherapy shows a higher efficacy and comparable safety for treatment of advanced CRC in relative to chemotherapy alone.

Apatinib for recurrent/progressive glioblastoma multiforme: A salvage option

Purpose: The recurrent/progressive glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) carries a dismal prognosis and the definitive treatment strategy has not yet been established. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of apatinib in recurrent/progressive GBM patients.

Materials and methods: The clinical data of 19 recurrent/progressive GBM patients who received apatinib treatment from November 2015 to December 2019 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center were collected retrospectively in this study. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were reviewed and assessed.

Results: The overall ORR was 52.6%, and the DCR was 73.7%. Median PFS and OS were 5.1 and 10.4 months, respectively. The 6-month PFS and OS rates were 38.9% and 68.4%, respectively. The 12-month PFS and OS rates were 16.7% and 36.8%, respectively. The treatment-related toxicities were generally well-tolerated. The most common grade 3/4 AEs were hand-foot syndrome (36.8%) and hypertension (21.1%).

Conclusion: Our study showed that apatinib therapy provided a better salvaging option for recurrent/progressive GBM patients and the toxicity was manageable.

Efficacy and safety of apatinib monotherapy for patients with advanced breast cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Patients with advanced breast cancer usually have poor prognosis. Apatinib is a small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and the reports regarding the efficacy and safety of apatinib monotherapy for advanced breast cancer in the current literature are controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to collect and pool efficacy and safety data of apatinib monotherapy for advanced breast cancer with the aim of providing up-to-date evidence to aid clinical practice.

Methods

This study was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42020190049). Three literature databases, including PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library, were searched. For evaluating efficacy, the objective response rate and disease control rate were extracted or calculated. Safety was evaluated in terms of the proportions of patients with grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events. The pooled proportions of the outcomes and their 95% confidence interval were shown. The Kaplan–Meier curves of overall survival and progression-free survival were pooled from the extracted data of the included studies. Furthermore, pooled medians for overall survival and progression-free survival were calculated. A p-value of &lt; 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Six studies were included and deemed eligible for further quality evaluation and analysis. The pooled objective response rate and disease control rate were 20.4% and 71.6%, respectively. The pooled proportions of four hematologic adverse events ranged from 2.6% to 6.9%. The pooled proportions of hypertension, hand-foot syndrome, transaminase increased, and proteinuria ranged from 4.1% to 24.3%, and other non-hematologic adverse events were &lt;1%. The pooled median progression-free survival and overall survival were 4.00 and 10.43 months, respectively, in cases of advanced breast cancer treated with apatinib.

Conclusions

This study confirms the reliable efficacy of apatinib monotherapy for advanced breast cancer. However, non-hematologic grade 3–4 adverse events, especially hypertension, are more frequently observed during apatinib treatment than during treatment with other tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as sunitinib or sorafenib.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020190049.

Apatinib plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as neoadjuvant therapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients: a prospective, cohort study

BACKGROUND

Apatinib, a small molecule targeting VEGFR2, is commonly used for advanced gastric cancer treatment. This prospective cohort study further investigated the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients.

METHODS

Ninety-six locally advanced gastric carcinoma patients were divided into the apatinib plus chemotherapy group (N = 45) and chemotherapy group (N = 51) according to their chosen treatment. Apatinib was administered (375 mg/day), and S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX) or oxaliplatin plus capecitabine (CapOx) was given as chemotherapy, for 3 cycles with 3 weeks a cycle before surgery.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (62.2% vs. 37.3%, P = 0.015) and pathological response grade (P = 0.011) were better; meanwhile, the tumor-resection rate (95.6% vs. 84.3%, P = 0.143) and pathological complete response rate (23.3% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.080) exhibited increasing trends (without statistical significance) in the apatinib plus chemotherapy group compared with the chemotherapy group. Additionally, the apatinib plus chemotherapy group achieved prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) (P = 0.019) and overall survival (OS) (P = 0.047) compared with the chemotherapy group. After adjusted by multivariate Cox's regression analysis, neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy was still superior to chemotherapy regarding DFS (hazard ratio (HR): 0.277, P = 0.014) and OS (HR: 0.316, P = 0.038). Notably, the incidences of adverse events between the two groups were not different (P > 0.050). Moreover, the most common adverse events of neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy were leukopenia (42.2%), fatigue (37.8%), hypertension (37.8%), and anemia (31.1%).

CONCLUSION

Neoadjuvant apatinib plus chemotherapy realizes better clinical response, pathological response, survival profile, and non-inferior safety profile compared to chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric carcinoma.

Effects of multi-kinase inhibitors on the activity of cytochrome P450 2J2

1. Cytochrome P450 2J2 (CYP2J2) shows high expression in extrahepatic tissues, including the heart and kidney and in tumours. Inhibition of CYP2J2 has attracted attention for cancer treatment because it metabolises arachidonic acid (AA) to epoxyeicosatrienoic acid (EET), which inhibits apoptosis and promotes tumour growth. Multi-kinase inhibitor (MKI) is a molecular-targeted drug with antitumor activities. This study aimed to clarify the inhibitory effects of MKIs on CYP2J2 activity. We also investigated whether MKIs affected CYP2J2-catalysed EET formation from AA.2. Twenty MKIs showed different inhibitory potencies against astemizole O-demethylation in CYP2J2. In particular, apatinib, motesanib, and vatalanib strongly inhibited astemizole O-demethylation. These three MKIs exhibited competitive inhibition with inhibition constant (K_i) values of 9.3, 15.4, and 65.0 nM, respectively. Apatinib, motesanib, and vatalanib also inhibited CYP2J2-catalysed 14,15-EET formation from AA.3. In simulations of docking to CYP2J2, the U energy values of apatinib, motesanib, and vatalanib were low, and measured -84.5, -69.9, and -52.3 kcal/mol, respectively.4. In conclusion, apatinib, motesanib, and vatalanib strongly inhibited CYP2J2 activity, suggesting that the effects of a given CYP2J2 substrate may be altered upon the administration of these MKIs.

What Is the Most Suitable Agent Combined With Apatinib for Transarterial Chemoembolization Treatment in Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients? A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Purpose

Combined therapy with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and apatinib is superior in therapeutic effect compared with TACE alone in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). To determine the most suitable agent combined with apatinib for TACE treatment, we did a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Methods

Four electronic databases were searched from inception until November 2021. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and retrospective studies that combined therapy of TACE and apatinib (TACE+A) compared with TACE alone were included. We performed random-effect pairwise and network meta-analyses to summarize the outcomes about efficacy and safety.

Results

Forty-five original studies including 3,876 patients were included. In terms of efficacy, we evaluated treatment response, 6 months overall survival (OS), 1 year OS, 6 months progression-free survival (PFS), 1 year PFS, alphafetoprotein (AFP), matrix metalloproteinase 9 (MMP9), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Significant differences always appear in TACE agent subgroups of adriamycin, platinum, and fluorouracil from both pairwise and network meta-analysis, while significant differences could also be found in apatinib dosage of 500 and >500 mg/day subgroups and in both RCT and retrospective study subgroups. From second time network analysis, compared with TACE alone, subgroups with TACE agents of oxaliplatin, cisplatin, pirarubicin, epirubicin, and 5-fluorouracil ranked front. In addition, the safety of adriamycin, platinum, and fluorouracil subgroups is acceptable.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the most suitable agents in TACE combined with apatinib were adriamycin+platinum ± fluorouracil combination therapy.

Systematic Review Registration

The study was registered with https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=311650, PROSPERO, CRD4202022311650

Treatment Response, Survival Benefit and Safety Profile of PD-1 Inhibitor Plus Apatinib Versus Apatinib Monotherapy in Advanced Colorectal Cancer Patients

Purpose

Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor plus apatinib is reported to be a promising strategy for advanced cancers. Moreover, a PD-1 inhibitor or apatinib exerts a certain efficacy in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC), whereas their synergistic effect is unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the treatment efficacy and safety of a PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib in advanced CRC patients.

Methods

In total, 45 advanced CRC patients who received a PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib (PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib group, N=20) or apatinib monotherapy (apatinib group, N=25) as third-line therapies were enrolled in the current study.

Results

The objective response rate (20.0% vs. 8.0%) (P=0.383) and disease control rate (70.0% vs. 52.0%) (P=0.221) were numerically increased in the PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib group, respectively, compared with the apatinib group, but no statistical significance was observed. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7.5 versus 4.8 months; the 1-year PFS rate was 32.5% versus 9.9%; the median overall survival (OS) was 12.3 versus 8.7 months; and the 1-year OS rate was 50.7% versus 27.0% in the PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib group versus the apatinib group, respectively. PFS (P=0.038) and OS (P=0.048) were prolonged in the PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib group compared with the apatinib group. PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib (versus apatinib) was independently associated with longer PFS (P=0.012) and OS (P=0.009). The majority of the adverse events were of grade 1-2, wherein the incidence was similar between groups, except for the fact that the incidence of capillary proliferation was elevated in the PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib group compared with the apatinib group (25.5% versus 0.0%) (P=0.013).

Conclusion

PD-1 inhibitor plus apatinib presents a potential improvement in efficacy and survival benefit compared with apatinib monotherapy, with tolerable safety in advanced CRC patients.

Studies of the Efficacy of Low-Dose Apatinib Monotherapy as Third-Line Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer and Apatinib’s Novel Anticancer Effect by Inhibiting Tumor-Derived Exosome Secretion

Simple Summary

We assessed the efficacy and safety of low-dose apatinib monotherapy as a third-line treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. The ORR and DCR were 4.0% (2/50) and 70% (35/50), and the median PFS and OS were 4.7 months and 10.1 months, which demonstrated comparable survival outcomes, significant improvements to the patient’s quality of life, and tolerable adverse reactions. We also disclosed a novel role of apatinib’s anticancer effect, i.e., inhibiting tumor-derived exosome release. Our results indicated that apatinib treatment inhibited exosome secretion through the regulation of MVB biogenesis, transport, and fusion by regulating LAMP2, RAB11, Snap23, and VAMP2. This novel regulatory mechanism provides a new perspective for the antitumor effect of apatinib in CRC treatment.

Abstract

Antiangiogenic therapy is an important treatment strategy for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We carried out a clinical study of low-dose apatinib (250 mg) monotherapy as a third-line treatment in patients with mCRC and assessed its efficacy and safety. It demonstrated that low-dose apatinib had comparable survival outcomes, significantly improved the patient quality of life, and caused tolerable adverse reactions. To further investigate the underlying mechanism of the effects of apatinib in CRC besides angiogenesis, we performed RNA-seq, and our results suggested that apatinib may have other potential antitumor mechanisms in CRC through multiple pathways, including exosomes secretion. In RKO and HCT116 cells, apatinib significantly reduced exosomes secretion by targeting multivesicular body (MVB) transport. Further studies have indicated that apatinib not only promoted the degradation of MVBs via the regulation of LAMP2 but also interfered with MVB transport by inhibiting Rab11 expression. Moreover, apatinib inhibited MVB membrane fusion by reducing SNAP23 and VAMP2 expression. In vivo, apatinib inhibited orthotopic murine colon cancer growth and metastasis and reduced the serum exosomes amount. This novel regulatory mechanism provides a new perspective for the antitumor effect of apatinib beyond angiogenesis inhibition.