Leveraging deep learning-based segmentation and contours-driven deformable registration for dose accumulation in abdominal structures

NRG Oncology Assessment of Artificial Intelligence Deep Learning-Based Auto-segmentation for Radiation Therapy: Current Developments, Clinical Considerations, and Future Directions

Deep learning neural networks (DLNN) in Artificial intelligence (AI) have been extensively explored for automatic segmentation in radiotherapy (RT). In contrast to traditional model-based methods, data-driven AI-based models for auto-segmentation have shown high accuracy in early studies in research settings and controlled environment (single institution). Vendor-provided commercial AI models are made available as part of the integrated treatment planning system (TPS) or as a stand-alone tool that provides streamlined workflow interacting with the main TPS. These commercial tools have drawn clinics' attention thanks to their significant benefit in reducing the workload from manual contouring and shortening the duration of treatment planning. However, challenges occur when applying these commercial AI-based segmentation models to diverse clinical scenarios, particularly in uncontrolled environments. Contouring nomenclature and guideline standardization has been the main task undertaken by the NRG Oncology. AI auto-segmentation holds the potential clinical trial participants to reduce interobserver variations, nomenclature non-compliance, and contouring guideline deviations. Meanwhile, trial reviewers could use AI tools to verify contour accuracy and compliance of those submitted datasets. In recognizing the growing clinical utilization and potential of these commercial AI auto-segmentation tools, NRG Oncology has formed a working group to evaluate the clinical utilization and potential of commercial AI auto-segmentation tools. The group will assess in-house and commercially available AI models, evaluation metrics, clinical challenges, and limitations, as well as future developments in addressing these challenges. General recommendations are made in terms of the implementation of these commercial AI models, as well as precautions in recognizing the challenges and limitations.

MRI-Guided Adaptive Radiation Therapy

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiation therapy (MRIgRT) has improved soft tissue contrast over computed tomography (CT) based image-guided RT. Superior visualization of the target and surrounding radiosensitive structures has the potential to improve oncological outcomes partly due to safer dose-escalation and adaptive planning. In this review, we highlight the workflow of adaptive MRIgRT planning, which includes simulation imaging, daily MRI, identifying isocenter shifts, contouring, plan optimization, quality control, and delivery. Increased utilization of MRIgRT will depend on addressing technical limitations of this technology, while addressing treatment efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and workflow training.

Artificial intelligence-based automated segmentation and radiotherapy dose mapping for thoracic normal tissues

Background and purpose

Objective assessment of delivered radiotherapy (RT) to thoracic organs requires fast and accurate deformable dose mapping. The aim of this study was to implement and evaluate an artificial intelligence (AI) deformable image registration (DIR) and organ segmentation-based AI dose mapping (AIDA) applied to the esophagus and the heart.

Materials and methods

AIDA metrics were calculated for 72 locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with concurrent chemo-RT to 60 Gy in 2 Gy fractions in an automated pipeline. The pipeline steps were: (i) automated rigid alignment and cropping of planning CT to week 1 and week 2 cone-beam CT (CBCT) field-of-views, (ii) AI segmentation on CBCTs, and (iii) AI-DIR-based dose mapping to compute dose metrics. AIDA dose metrics were compared to the planned dose and manual contour dose mapping (manual DA).

Results

AIDA required ∼2 min/patient. Esophagus and heart segmentations were generated with a mean Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.80±0.15 and 0.94±0.05, a Hausdorff distance at 95th percentile (HD95) of 3.9±3.4 mm and 14.1±8.3 mm, respectively. AIDA heart dose was significantly lower than the planned heart dose (p = 0.04). Larger dose deviations (>=1Gy) were more frequently observed between AIDA and the planned dose (N = 26) than with manual DA (N = 6).

Conclusions

Rapid estimation of RT dose to thoracic tissues from CBCT is feasible with AIDA. AIDA-derived metrics and segmentations were similar to manual DA, thus motivating the use of AIDA for RT applications.

Liver SBRT dose accumulation to assess the impact of anatomic variations on normal tissue doses and toxicity in patients treated with concurrent sorafenib

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Unexpected liver volume reductions occurred during trials of liver SBRT and concurrent sorafenib. The aims were to accumulate liver SBRT doses to assess the impact of these anatomic variations on normal tissue dose parameters and toxicity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty-two patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) or metastases treated on trials of liver SBRT (30-57 Gy, 6 fractions) and concurrent sorafenib were analyzed. SBRT doses were accumulated using biomechanical deformable registration of daily cone-beam CT. Dose deviations (accumulated-planned) for normal tissues were compared for patients with liver volume reductions > 100 cc versus stable volumes, and accumulated doses were reported for three patients with grade 3-5 luminal gastrointestinal toxicities.

RESULTS

Patients with reduced (N = 12) liver volumes had larger mean deviations of 0.4-1.3 Gy in normal tissues, versus -0.2-0.4 Gy for stable cases (N = 20), P > 0.05. Deviations > 5% of the prescribed dose occurred in both groups. Two HCC patients with toxicities to small and large bowel had liver volume reductions and deviations to the maximum dose of 4% (accumulated 36.9 Gy) and 3% (accumulated 33.4 Gy) to these organs respectively. Another HCC patient with a toxicity of unknown location plus tumor rupture, had stable liver volumes and deviations to luminal organs of -6% to 4.5% (accumulated < 30.5 Gy).

CONCLUSION

Liver volume reductions during SBRT and concurrent sorafenib were associated with larger increases in accumulated dose to normal tissues versus stable liver volumes. These dosimetric changes may have further contributed to toxicities in HCC patients who have higher baseline risks.