Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value: A New Prognostic Index in Operative Breast Cancer

Pan-immune-inflammation value: a new prognostic index in operative laryngeal and pharyngeal carcinomas

PURPOSE

This study aimed to further evaluate the potential value of Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) as a prognostic marker in patients with laryngeal and pharyngeal tumors.

METHODS

A total of 545 patients with laryngeal and pharyngeal tumors who underwent surgery at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University were included. We determined the optimal cutoff of PIV and divided the patients into two groups. The relationship between PIV and clinicopathological features was explored by the chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney U test. Survival analysis and Cox regression analysis were used to evaluate the relationship between PIV and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). We also compared the prognostic predictive value of PIV with other inflammation-related markers. Finally, we developed a simple scoring prediction model based on several independent prognostic parameters.

RESULTS

We found that PIV was statistically associated with clinicopathological features such as tumor stage (p < 0.001), node stage (p = 0.001), postoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.026), and vascular thrombosis (p = 0.027). Survival analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between elevated PIV and reduced OS and DFS (p < 0.0001). Multivariate Cox regression analysis further confirmed PIV as a prognostic indicator (HR 2.507; 95% CI 1.343-4.681; p = 0.004), which is superior to SII, NLR, MLR and PLR. Three of the independent prognostic factors screened by multivariate Cox regression analysis were selected to be used to create a scoring system with a concordance index of 0.756.

CONCLUSIONS

Elevated PIV is associated with poor prognosis in patients with laryngeal and pharyngeal tumors, suggesting that PIV may be an important adjunctive indicator for assessing patient prognosis.

REGISTRATION INFORMATION

Registration number: KYLL-202307-001, date: July 2023.

The Importance of Pan-Immune Inflammation Value (PIV) in Predicting Coronary Collateral Circulation in Stable Coronary Artery Patients

In this study, the correlation between pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) and coronary collateral circulation (CCC) in patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) was analyzed. The study included 663 patients with CCS who underwent coronary angiography and had coronary stenosis of ≥95% in at least one major coronary vessel. The participants were divided into two groups: good CCC (Rentrop score 2-3) and poor CCC (Rentrop score 0-1). PIV score was calculated as monocyte x platelet x neutrophil/lymphocyte count. When the patient groups who developed good and poor CCC were compared, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) (P < .001), C-reactive protein (CRP) levels, CRP/albumin ratio (CAR) (P < .001), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) (P < .001), and PIV (P < .001) were higher in patients with poor CCC. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, age, SII, NLR, CRP, CAR, and PIV were found to be independent predictors of poor CCC (P < .001, for all). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated that a cut-off value of 442.2 for PIV predicted poor CCC slightly better compared to other markers, with 76.8% sensitivity and 70.1% specificity (area under ROC curve = 0.808 (95% CI: 0.764-0.851), P < .001). These findings suggest that PIV can be used as an independent predictor of CCC development.

Pan‑immune‑inflammation value as a novel prognostic biomarker in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

The pan-immune-inflammation-value (PIV) is a comprehensive biomarker that integrates different peripheral blood cell subsets. The present study aimed to evaluate the prognostic ability of PIV in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) undergoing chemoradiotherapy. PIV was assessed using the following equation: (Neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox hazards regression models were used for survival analyses. The optimal cut-off values for PIV and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) were determined using receiver operating characteristic analysis to be 428.0 and 1032.7, respectively. A total of 319 patients were recruited. Patients with a low baseline PIV (≤428.0) accounted for 69.9% (n=223) and patients with a high baseline PIV (>428.0) accounted for 30.1% (n=96). Compared with patients with low PIV, patients with a high PIV had significantly worse 5-year progression-free survival [PFS; 66.8 vs. 77.1%; hazard ratio (HR), 1.97; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.22-3.23); P=0.005] and 5-year overall survival (OS; 68.7 vs. 86.9%, HR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.45-5.03; P=0.001). PIV was also a significant independent prognostic indicator for OS (HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.16-4.12; P=0.016) and PFS (HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.14-3.04; P=0.013) and outperformed the SII in multivariate analysis. In conclusion, the PIV was a powerful predictor of survival outcomes and outperformed the SII in patients with NPC treated with chemoradiotherapy. Prospective validation of the PIV should be performed to better stratify radical treatment of patients with NPC.

Development and internal validation of a nomogram based on peripheral blood inflammatory markers for predicting prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory markers, including the product of neutrophil count, platelet count, and monocyte count divided by lymphocyte count (PIV) and the platelet-to-white blood cell ratio (PWR), have not been previously reported as prognostic factors in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. In order to predict overall survival (OS) in NPC patients, our goal was to create and internally evaluate a nomogram based on inflammatory markers (PIV, PWR).

METHODS

A retrospective study was done on patients who received an NPC diagnosis between January 2015 and December 2018. After identifying independent prognostic indicators linked to OS using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, we created a nomogram with the factors we had chosen.

RESULTS

A total of 630 NPC patients in all were split into training (n = 441) and validation sets (n = 189) after being enrolled in a population-based study in 2015-2018 and monitored for a median of 5.9 years. In the training set, the age, PIV, and PWR, selected as independent predictors for OS via multivariate Cox's regression model, were chosen to develop a nomogram. Both training and validation cohorts had C-indices of 0.850 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.768-0.849) and 0.851 (95% CI: 0.765-0.877). Furthermore, compared with traditional TNM staging, our nomogram demonstrated greater accuracy in predicting patient outcomes. The risk stratification model derived from our prediction model may facilitate personalized treatment strategies for NPC patients.

CONCLUSION

Our findings confirmed the prognostic significance of the PWR and PIV in NPC. High PIV levels (>363.47) and low PWR (≤36.42) values are associated with worse OS in NPC patients.

Association between pan-immune inflammatory value and ulcerative colitis

OBJECTIVE

Ulcerative colitis is a chronic idiopathic disease that causes inflammation of the colon and rectum, progressing with relapses and remissions. Systemic inflammatory index (SII) and pan-immune inflammatory value (PIV) are newly developed biomarkers. There are many studies in the literature showing the relationship between SII and PIV with malignancies and inflammatory diseases. In this study we aimed to determine the relationship between SII and PIV with the activity of ulcerative colitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

146 Ulcerative colitis patients were retrospectively investigated by the time of diagnosis based on clinical, endoscopic and histolopathological findings. Patients and healthy individuals SII and PIV levels were calculated and compared with each other; and Mayo, DUBLIN, UCIES endoscopic subscores of patients were also obtained. Roc curve analysis were used to determine the cut-off value for PIV.

RESULTS

SII (468.6 ± 203.5 vs. 823.1 ± 555.1; p < .001), PIV (288.2 ± 159.9 vs. 912.2 ± 924.1; p < .001), were statistically different between groups. PIV (OR: 1.157; (1.041-1.432), p = .036), was also observed to be the independent predictor of ulcerative colitis. The best cut off value of PIV in the prediction of ulcerative colitis was ≥ 506 with 89.6% sensitivity and 63.7% specificity (AUC = 0.812; 95% CI 0.763-0.854, p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of our study, we found that SII and PIV levels were significantly increased in ulcerative colitis patients at the time of diagnosis and were associated with disease severity in the endoscopic scores RACHMILEWITZ, UCEIS and DUBLIN scores, but not for MES score.

The Role of Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value in Determining the Severity of Coronary Artery Disease in NSTEMI Patients

BACKGROUND

Even though medication and interventional therapy have improved the death rate for non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) patients, these patients still have a substantial residual risk of cardiovascular events. Early identification of high-risk individuals is critical for improving prognosis, especially in this patient group. The focus of recent research has switched to finding new related indicators that can help distinguish high-risk patients. For this purpose, we examined the relationship between the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) and the severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) defined by the SYNTAX score (SxS) in NSTEMI patients.

METHODS

Based on the SxS, CAD patients were split into three groups. To evaluate the risk variables of CAD, multivariate logistic analysis was employed.

RESULTS

The PIV (odds ratio: 1.003; 95% CI: 1.001-1.005; p = 0.005) was found to be an independent predictor of a high SxS in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. Additionally, there was a positive association between the PIV and SxS (r: 0.68; p < 0.001). The PIV predicted the severe coronary lesion in the receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis with a sensitivity of 91% and specificity of 81.1%, using an appropriate cutoff value of 568.2.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with non-STEMI, the PIV, a cheap and easily measured laboratory variable, was substantially correlated with a high SxS and the severity of CAD.

The prognostic importance of the pan-immune-inflammation value in patients with septic shock

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), a novel biomarker combining neutrophil platelet, monocyte, and lymphocyte counts, some of the most widespread indicators of systemic inflammation, can predict mortality and prognosis in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with septic shock.

METHOD

This prospective study was performed with 82 patients aged 18 or over admitted to a tertiary ICU with diagnoses of septic shock. Patients with hematological disease and neutropenia were excluded. PIV was calculated with the formula [neutrophil count (103/μL) × platelet count (103/μL) × monocyte count (103/μL)]/lymphocyte count (103/μL).

RESULTS

Median age, presence of hypertension, Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II) levels, and neutrophil, monocyte, and platelet counts were lower in the low-PIV group than in the high-PIV group (p < 0.05). The highest area under ROC curve (AUC) was determined for Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) (0.94 (0.89 - 0.99)), followed by Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) (0.81 (0.70 - 0.91)), APACHE II (0.80 (0.69 - 0.91)) and lactate (0.77 (0.67 - 0.88)). Median survival was longer in the low-PIV group than in the high-PIV group (28 (15.25 - 40.76) vs 16 (9.46 - 22.55) days, respectively, p < 0.05). The univariate Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model showed that high PIV (HR = 2.13 (1.03-4.38)), low GCS (HR = 3.31 (1.34 - 8.15)), high SOFA (HR = 9.41 (2.86 - 30.95)), high APACHE II (HR = 3.08 (1.47 - 6.45)), high lactate (HR = 6.56 (2.73 - 15.75)), and high procalcitonin (PCT) (HR = 2.73 (1.11 - 6.69)) values were associated with a decreased survival time among ICU patients (p < 0.05). The multivariate CPH model showed the age-adjusted risk estimates for these six laboratory parameters. High lactate (HR = 7.97 (2.19 - 29.08)) and high SOFA scores (HR = 4.85 (1.22 - 19.32)) were significantly associated with shorter survival in ICU patients (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The findings of this research suggest that PIV could predict the longer survival in patients with septic shock. Despite PIV score's capability to show inflammation, it is not significantly associated with mortality in the multivariate analysis.

Pretreatment Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value (PIV) in Predicting Therapeutic Response and Clinical Outcomes of Neoadjuvant Immunochemotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

The pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), which reflects the balance between the host immune and inflammatory status, is a readily available index for evaluating cancer outcomes. Until now, however, no study has demonstrated the clinical response of PIV to neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy (NICT) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 218 patients with ESCC who underwent NICT. The relationship between PIV and therapeutic response (pathological complete response [PCR]) and clinical outcomes (overall survival [OS] and disease-free survival [DFS]) was examined. Cox proportional, hazard-regression analyses and the Kaplan-Meier method were used for survival analyses. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to establish a novel risk stratification model.

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients (30.3%) achieved PCR after NICT. Using PCR as the endpoint of interest, patients were compared in groups based on the optimal threshold. PIV was closely related to PCR (odds ratio [OR] 0.311, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.140-0.690, P = 0.004). Compared with patients in the low PIV cohort, patients with high PIV had worse 3-year OS (58.7% vs. 83.6%, P < 0.001) and DFS (51.9% vs. 79.1%, P < 0.001). PIV was an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio [HR] 2.364, 95% CI 1.183-4.724, P = 0.015) and DFS (HR 1.729, 95% CI 1.026-2.913, P = 0.040). Three risk groups with varied DFS and OS were staged by using an RPA method, and the prognostication accuracy was considerably improved.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment PIV can predict the therapeutic efficacy of NICT for ESCC. Because of better prognostic stratification, pretreatment PIV is a novel, sensitive, and effective indicator in ESCC receiving NICT. The prognostic results of PIV need to be verified in additional prospective studies.

Pan-immune-inflammation value is associated with poor prognosis in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND

Immune-inflammatory biomarkers (IIBs) have been shown to be correlated with prognosis in patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD). In this study, we aimed to evaluate the relationship between a novel comprehensive biomarker, the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), and the prognosis of patients undergoing PD.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from a multicenter, large-sample PD database. PIV was calculated as (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count. The prognostic endpoints in this study were all-cause death all-cause, cardiovascular disease (CVD) and infection-related death. The Kaplan-Meier method, a Cox proportional hazards regression, Fine-Gray competing risk model, smooth curve, and subgroup analysis were used to analyze the independent relationship between PIV and the prognosis of patients undergoing PD.

RESULTS

A total of 2796 cases of PD were included, and the study population was divided into Tertiles 1, 2, and 3, according to the tertiles of baseline PIVs. After adjusting for multiple model factors, patients in the Tertile 3 group had a significantly higher risk of all-cause death, CVD death and infection-related death compared with patients with PIV in the Tertile 1 group. Interaction tests showed no positive correlations for subgroup parameters. Regarding all-cause death, compared with the lowest tertile, the multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) of the highest and middle tertiles were 1.55 (1.25-1.94) and 1.77 (1.43-2.19), respectively; PIV (log2 processing) was associated with 17% excess of mortality in the continuous model.

CONCLUSIONS

A high PIV at baseline was significantly associated with an increased risk of deaths due to all-causes, CVD and infection in patients undergoing PD.

Peripheral blood inflammatory indexes in breast cancer: A review

Immune and inflammatory responses play an important role in tumorigenesis and metastasis. Inflammation is an important component of the tumor microenvironment, and the changes in inflammatory cells may affect the occurrence and development of tumors. Complete blood count at the time of diagnosis and treatment can reflect the inflammatory status within the tumor. Studies have shown that the number of certain inflammatory cells in peripheral blood and their ratios are important prognostic factors for many malignancies, including neutrophil, lymphocyte, monocyte, and platelet counts, as well as neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, systemic immune-inflammation index, systemic inflammation response index and pan-immune-inflammation-value. The value of peripheral blood inflammation indexes in predicting the efficacy and prognosis of breast cancer neoadjuvant therapy is worth recognizing. This review details the application of peripheral blood inflammation indexes in the evaluation of efficacy and prediction of prognosis in neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer, aiming to provide a more comprehensive reference for the comprehensive diagnosis and treatment of breast cancer.

A Novel Albumin-Related Nutrition Biomarker Predicts Breast Cancer Prognosis in Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Two-Center Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Recently, there has been a growing focus on the prognostic significance of nutrition-related biomarkers. We attempted to explore the association between a novel albumin-related nutrition marker called "lymphocyte × albumin (LA)" and disease-free survival (DFS) in breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

METHODS

In total, 711 non-metastatic breast cancer patients who underwent NAC at two medical centers were retrospectively analyzed. We performed least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis as well as multivariate Cox regression analyses to identify the variables associated with DFS and to establish a predictive nomogram.

RESULTS

The nomogram incorporated four variables based on the multivariate analysis of DFS in the training cohort: LA, ypN stage, ypT stage, and hormone receptor status. In comparison with the traditional TNM staging system, the nomogram demonstrated superior discrimination, calibration ability, and clinical usefulness in both the training set and internal and external validation sets. Furthermore, patients stratified into different risk groups resulted in significant differences in DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

LA is an independent prognostic biomarker, and LA-based prognostic nomogram offers a more precise assessment of DFS for breast cancer patients treated with NAC, potentially serving as a valuable tool for personalized prognostic predictions.

Prognostic significance of the pretreatment pan-immune-inflammation value in cancer patients: an updated meta-analysis of 30 studies

Background

The pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) has been reported as a promising prognostic biomarker in multiple cancers but still remains inconclusive. The objective of this study is to systematically investigate the association of the pretreatment PIV with survival outcomes in cancer patients, based on available literature.

Methods

Online databases including PubMed, Embase and the Web of Science were thoroughly searched for studies evaluating the prognostic role of the pretreatment PIV in cancers from the inception to June 2023. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were always assessed using a random-effects model. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata 12.0.

Results

Thirty studies were finally included after comprehensively study searching. In total, 8,799 cancer patients were enrolled in this meta-analysis. The pooled results demonstrated that patients in the high PIV group had a significantly poorer overall survival (HR = 2.07; 95%CI: 1.77-2.41; I2 = 73.0%) and progression-free survival (HR = 1.83; 95%CI: 1.37-2.45; I2 = 98.2%) than patients in the low PIV group. The prognostic significance of the PIV score on overall survival and progression-free survival was observed across various geographical regions, tumor stages and treatment strategies. Sensitivity analyses supported the stability of the above combined results.

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrated that the pretreatment PIV could be a non-invasive and efficacious prognostic biomarker for cancer patients.

The prognostic impact of inflammation in patients with decompensated acute heart failure, as assessed using the pan-immune inflammation value (PIV)

There is increasing evidence that composite scores based on blood counts, which are reflectors of uncontrolled inflammation in the development and progression of heart failure, can be used as prognostic biomarkers in heart failure patients. The prognostic effects of pan-immune inflammation (PIV) as an independent predictor of in-hospital mortality in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) were evaluated based on this evidence. The data of 640 consecutive patients hospitalized for New York Heart Association (NYHA) class 2-3-4 AHF with reduced ejection fraction were analyzed and 565 patients were included after exclusion. The primary outcome was in hospital all-cause death. Secondary outcomes were defined as the following in-hospital events: Acute kidney injury (AKI), malignant arrhythmias, acute renal failure (ARF) and stroke. The PIV was computed using hemogram parameters such as lymphocytes, neutrophils, monocytes and platelets. Patients were categorized as low or high PIV group according to the median value, which was 382.8. A total of 81 (14.3%) in-hospital deaths, 31 (5.4%) AKI, 34 (6%) malignant arrhythmias, 60 (10.6%) ARF and 11 (2%) strokes were reported. Patients with high PIV had a higher in-hospital mortality rate than patients with low PIV (OR: 1.51, 95% CI, 1.26-1.80, p < 0.001). Incorporating PIV into the full model significantly improved model performance (odds ratio X2, p < 0.001) compared to the baseline model constructed with other inflammatory markers. PIV is a potent predictor of prognosis with better performance than other well-known inflammatory markers for patients with AHF.

Association between pan-immune-inflammation value and no-reflow in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Noreflow is a condition associated with a poor prognosis in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. It has been shown that many inflammatory markers and index such as procalcitonin, C-reactive protein, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio, systemic immune inflammatory index (SII), are associated with noreflow. We used a brand-new index pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) to retrospectively evaluate the relationship between PIV and noreflow. A total of 1212 patients were included for analysis. Noreflow was observed in 145 patients. In multivariate analysis, PIV (odds ratio (OR): 1.025; [1.002-1.115], p < 0.001), baseline ejection fraction (OR: 0.963; [0.934-0.993], p = 0.015), stent length (OR: 1.032; [1.010-1.054], p = 0.004), age (OR: 1.034; [1.014-1.053], p = 0.001) and pain to PCI time (OR: 1.003 [1.002-1.005], p < 0.001) were observed to be the independent predictors of noreflow. ROC curve analysis showed that the best cut off value of PIV for predicting noreflow was ≥889 with 77.2% sensitivity and 77.5% specificity (AUC, 0.828; 95% CI [0.806-0.849]). A ROC curve comparison analysis was performed to compare PIV and SII. The predictive power of PIV was higher than SII (differences between areas: 0.154; p < 0.001). According to our findings, an increase in PIV is an independent predictor of noreflow in patients with STEMI.

Pan-Immune-Inflammation Index as a Biomarker for Rheumatoid Arthritis Progression and Diagnosis

Introduction Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic autoimmune condition that causes systemic inflammation and affects multiple joints. It is characterized by joint warmth, swelling, pain, and the formation of invasive synovial tissue known as pannus, which contributes to cartilage and bone degradation. Pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), a marker derived from complete blood count parameters, has shown promise in predicting prognosis in various cancer types and pediatric conditions associated with immune abnormalities. This study aims to explore the relationship between RA, characterized by chronic inflammation and immune system involvement, and PIV, potentially shedding light on novel insights into RA's clinical implications. Methods One hundred four participants, including 64 RA patients (both newly diagnosed and established cases) and 40 healthy controls, were included in the study. Exclusion criteria for RA patients included acute infection, cancer, diabetes, or chronic illness, while control participants were excluded for inflammatory disorders, active infection, diabetes, or malignancy. We assessed disease severity using Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS 28) and obtained complete blood count values, including neutrophil, lymphocyte, platelet, monocyte, and red cell distribution width. C-reactive peptide (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate were also added. Statistical analyses included correlation assessments, t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, and multivariate linear regression. A multiclass receiver operating characteristic analysis determined optimal PIV cut-off values for distinguishing control, remission, and active RA groups, with sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and odds ratios calculated. Results This study comprised a cohort of 104 participants, with a median age of 43.5±17.5. The Remission group was significantly younger than the Control group (p=0.006) but not compared to the Active RA group (p=0.393). CRP levels were significantly higher in the Active RA group (p<0.001). Neutrophil counts were highest in the Active RA group (p<0.001), as were monocyte counts. Lymphocyte counts were significantly lower in the Active RA group (p<0.001). There were no significant differences in sedimentation rate, hemoglobin, platelet count, and mean platelet volume. PIV was significantly elevated in the Active RA group (p<0.001) and higher in the Remission group than in the Control group (p=0.001). A PIV value of 353.48 exhibited 71.4% sensitivity, 86.2% specificity, 86.2% PPV, 71.4% NPV, and 78.13% test accuracy for distinguishing active rheumatoid arthritis (p<0.001). A PIV value exceeding 353.48 substantially increased the likelihood of a patient belonging to the active rheumatoid arthritis group, with a 14.62-fold higher probability. Furthermore, the study explored the relationship between clinical and laboratory variables and disease activity in RA patients, finding significant differences in PIV among DAS groups (p=0.025). Conclusions The PIV offers a notable advantage as its constituent parameters are routinely assessed in rheumatoid arthritis and involve cost-effective and straightforward tests. We demonstrated that PIV serves as a valuable marker for distinguishing between remission and active RA when compared to healthy individuals. Additionally, it proved to be an effective tool for assessing disease activity in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

Clinical utility of the pan-immune-inflammation value in breast cancer patients

Background

The newly discovered pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) has been illustrated to have good prognostic value for cancer patient prognosis. However, the prognostic usefulness of PIV in breast cancer patients is unknown. As a result, to aid the clinic in providing a distinctive and trustworthy biomarker to better assess breast cancer patient's prognosis, we conducted this meta-analysis to investigate the relationship between PIV and the survival of breast cancer patients.

Methods

We conducted a systematic search of Pubmed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and the CNKI databases to screen for eligible studies published up to April 2023. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and pathological complete response (pCR). The hazard ratio (HR) and the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were used as the indicators. STATA 15.0 software was used to perform meta-analysis, sensitivity analysis, and publication bias analysis.

Results

A total of eight articles, involving 2953 patients, met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that patients with higher PIV levels had a significantly shorter OS (HR: 2.045, 95% CI: 1.355-3.086, P = 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.466, 95% CI: 1.163-1.848, P = 0.001). Besides, the PIV value was negatively correlated with the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results of this study were reliable and stable.

Conclusions

PIV has a good prognostic value in breast cancer patients and is expected to be a prognostic biomarker for breast cancer.

Association of Circulating Tumor Cells, Megakaryocytes and a High Immune-Inflammatory Environment in Metastatic Breast Cancer

Liquid biopsy is becoming an important source of new biomarkers during the treatment of metastatic cancer patients. Using size-based microfluid technology, we isolated circulating tumor cells (CTCs) from metastatic breast cancer patients to evaluate their presence and cluster formation, as well as the presence of megakaryocytes and immune-inflammatory blood cells, and to correlate their presence with clinicopathological data and overall survival (OS). In total, 59 patients (median age 60.4 years) were included in the study: 62.7% luminal A/B-like, 20.3% HER2-positive, and 17% triple-negative. Our results showed that at least one CTC was present in 79.7% and ≥5 CTCs in 35.2% of the patients. CTC clusters were present in patients with ≥5 CTCs only (in 19.2% of them), and megakaryocytes were present in 52% of all patients. The presence of CTC clusters and megakaryocytes was positively associated with the CTC count. Patients with low pan-inflammatory value (PIV), low systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII), and low relative change from baseline (ΔPIV%, ΔSII%) were associated with significantly higher OS than their counterparts. ΔPIV%, the presence of infection in the last month, and a long duration of metastatic disease were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS. The interplay of CTCs, CTC clusters, megakaryocytes, and PIV needs to be further explored.

Discovering the Clinical and Prognostic Role of Pan-Immune-Inflammation Values on Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma

A newly introduced pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) was not evaluated for its role in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). In this study, the PIV was calculated with the following equation (neutrophil count × platelet count × monocyte count)/lymphocyte count from the results of the automated hematology analyzers in 853 OSCC patients from 2005 to 2017. The optimal cutoff for the preoperative PIV was 268, as determined by a receiver operating characteristic curve. Significant differences were observed for alcohol consumption, smoking, pT status, pN status, overall pathological status, extranodal extension, cell differentiation, depth of invasion, and perineural invasion between higher and lower PIV patients (all p values < 0.05). Kaplan-Meier and univariate regression analyses indicated that higher PIV was associated with worse overall survival, disease-free survival, locoregional recurrence-free survival, and distant metastasis-free survival (all p values < 0.001). Multivariate analyses adjusted by various factors further demonstrated that PIV was an independent prognostic factor for overall and distant metastasis-free survival (p = 0.027, HR: 1.281 and p = 0.031, HR: 1.274, respectively). In conclusion, a higher PIV level was associated with poor clinicopathological factors in OSCC patients and could be used to predict poor posttreatment outcomes, especially for overall and distant metastasis-free survival.

The relationship between the pan-immune-inflammation value and long-term prognoses in patients with hypertension: National Health and Nutrition Examination Study, 1999-2018

Background

Direct antihypertensive therapy in hypertensive patients with a high CVD risk can reduce the incidence of cardiovascular death but increase adverse cardiovascular events, so additional ways to identify hypertensive patients at high risk may be needed. Studies have shown that immunity and inflammation affect the prognoses of patients with hypertension and that the pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) is an index to assess immunity and inflammation, but few studies have applied the PIV index to patients with hypertension.

Objective

To explore the relationship between the PIV and long-term all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with hypertension.

Method

Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999-2018 with a mortality follow-up through December 31, 2019, were analyzed. A total of 26,781 participants were evaluated. The patients were grouped based on PIV levels as follows: T1 group (n = 8,938), T2 group (n = 8,893), and T3 group (n = 8,950). The relationship between the PIV and long-term all-cause and cardiovascular death was assessed by survival curves and Cox regression analysis based on the NHANES recommended weights.

Result

The PIV was significantly associated with long-term all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in patients with hypertension. After full adjustment, patients with higher PIV have a higher risk of all-cause [Group 3: HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.20-1.55, p < 0.001] and cardiovascular [Group 3: HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.22-2.15, p < 0.001] mortality.

Conclusion

Elevated PIV was associated with increased all-cause mortality and cardiovascular mortality in hypertensive patients.

Prognostic value of pan-immune-inflammation value in colorectal cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) has been reported as a novel prognostic biomarker in multiple malignancies. The aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic value of the PIV in patients with colorectal cancer.

Methods

We comprehensively searched electronic databases including PubMed, Embase and Web of Science up to August 2022. The endpoints were survival outcomes. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for survival data were collected for analysis.

Results

Six studies including 1879 participants were included. A significant heterogeneity in the PIV cut-off value among studies was observed. The combined results indicated that patients in the high baseline PIV group had a worse overall survival (HR=2.09; 95%CI: 1.67-2.61; P<0.0001; I^{2 =} 7%) and progression-free survival (HR=1.82; 95%CI: 1.49-2.22; P<0.0001; I^{2 =} 15%). In addition, early PIV increase after treatment initiation was significantly associated with decreased overall survival (HR=1.79; 95%CI: 1.13-2.93; P=0.01; I^{2 =} 26%), and a trend toward poor progression-free survival (HR=2.00; 95%CI: 0.90-4.41; P=0.09; I^{2 =} 70%).

Conclusion

Based on existing evidence, the PIV could act as a valuable prognostic index in patients with colorectal cancer. However, the heterogeneity in the PIV cut-off value among studies should be considered when interpreting these findings.

Role of pan immune inflammatory value in the evaluation of hepatosteatosis in children and adolescents with obesity

OBJECTIVES

Inflammation is a feature of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease progression and plays an important role in hepatic steatosis and fibrosis. Since there are no studies in the literature showing the relationship between hepatosteatosis with the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) and pan-immune inflammation value (PIV), we aimed to evaluate the relationship between these biomarkers and hepatosteatosis in childhood.

METHODS

We included 133 consecutive obese children and adolescents aged 6-18 years into this single-center, retrospective, and cross-sectional study. Anthropometric, physical examination, radiological and laboratory data were obtained and recorded from the file records of each case.

RESULTS

When we grouped the patient population according to the grade of hepatosteatosis, there was a statistically significant difference between the groups in terms of SII and PIV values (p<0.05, for both). In the analyzes performed to identify independent predictors of hepatosteatosis pubertal status (p=0.019) and PIV value (p<0.001) were found to be significant as independent predictors. Moreover, in the analysis performed to predict severity of hepatic steatosis, regression analysis was performed by dividing the groups into groups with and without severe adiposity. As a result of this analysis, HOMA-IR (p=0.019) and PIV value (p=0.028) were found to be significant in the prediction of severe hepatic adiposity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings showed that increased PIV levels were associated with the presence and severity of hepatic steatosis, but not with SII.

Prognostic Potential of Immune Inflammatory Biomarkers in Breast Cancer Patients Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

Simple Summary

Systemic inflammation is associated with an increased aggressiveness of breast cancer and can contribute to a decreased activity of neoadjuvant treatments. Biomarkers of systemic inflammation are easily obtained from routine blood counts and are highly cost-effective, having great potential to steer cancer prognosis in clinical practice. In our study, we tested the hypothesis that high values of these biomarkers might have an effect on the clinical outcomes in a population of patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. The results of our study, together with data from the literature, hint at a possible role of inflammatory markers in the diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm of breast cancer, where specific pre-operative blood cell ratios could be used in combination with biological and clinical factors to tailor adjuvant therapy.

Abstract

Immune inflammatory biomarkers are easily obtained and inexpensive blood-based parameters that recently showed prognostic and predictive value in many solid tumors. In this study, we aimed to investigate the role of these biomarkers in predicting distant relapse in breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). All breast cancer patients who referred to our Breast Unit and underwent NACT were retrospectively reviewed. The pre-treatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) were calculated from complete blood counts. The primary outcome was 5-year distant-metastasis-free survival (DMFS). In receiver operating characteristic analyses, the optimal cutoff values for the NLR, PLR, MLR, and PIV were determined at 2.25, 152.46, 0.25, and 438.68, respectively. High levels of the MLR, but not the NLR, PLR, or PIV, were associated with improved 5-year DMSF in the study population using both univariate (HR 0.52, p = 0.03) and multivariate analyses (HR, 0.44; p = 0.02). Our study showed that the MLR was a significant independent parameter affecting DMFS in breast cancer patients undergoing NACT. Prospective studies are required to confirm this finding and to define reliable cutoff values, thus leading the way for the clinical application of this biomarker.

Evaluation of systemic inflammatory and nutritional indexes in locally advanced gastric cancer treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after D2 dissection

BACKGROUND

Many studies have shown that the peripheral blood inflammatory index and nutritional index, such as the platelet lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil lymphocyte ratio (NLR), lymphocyte monocyte ratio (LMR), systemic inflammation response index (SIRI), pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and prognostic nutrition index (PNI), are independent prognostic factors for tumors. The present study aimed to investigate the prognostic role of these peripheral blood indexes before treatment in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC) treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after D2 dissection.

METHODS

A total of 89 patients with LAGC who underwent D2 gastrectomy and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy at our hospital from 2010-2018 were eligible. Systemic inflammatory indicators before treatment were evaluated. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), Kaplan-Meier analysis, and Cox regression were utilized for prognosis evaluation.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 29.1 (4.1-115.8) months. The overall survival at 3 years (OS) and the disease-free survival (DFS) were 78.9% and 59.1%, respectively. According to the ROC curve for 3-year DFS, the best cut-off values of pre-treatment NLR, PLR, LMR, SII, SIRI, PIV and PNI were 1.7, 109.3, 2.9, 369.2, 0.58, 218.7, and 48, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that NLR was an independent prognostic factor for DFS (HR 2.991, 95%CI 1.085-8.248, P = 0.034). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that a higher NLR (>1.70) was significantly associated with a poorer OS (3-year OS: 68.8% vs 92.9%, P = 0.045) and DFS (3-year DFS: 47.5% vs 80.9%, P = 0.005). In terms of the free locoregional recurrence rate (LRR), the prognosis of patients with high NLR was also significantly worse than those with low NLR (70.2% vs 96.0%, P = 0.017). Paraaortic lymph nodes were the most common site of LRR (7/14 patients). The seven cases of paraaortic lymph node metastasis occurred in patients with high NLR.

CONCLUSIONS

In our retrospective analysis, we found that pretreatment NLR could serve as a prognostic factor for survival in LAGC treated with adjuvant chemoradiotherapy after D2 dissection, especially for the prediction of LRR and paraaortic lymph node metastasis. Prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.

The Association between the Pan-Immune-Inflammation Value and Cancer Prognosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Prognostic scores derived from the blood count have garnered significant interest as an indirect measure of the inflammatory pressure in cancer. The recently developed pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV), an equation including the neutrophil, platelet, monocyte, and lymphocyte levels, has been evaluated in several cohorts, although with variations in the tumor types, disease stages, cut-offs, and treatments. Therefore, we evaluated the association between survival and PIV in cancer, performing a systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: We conducted a systematic review from the Pubmed, Medline, and Embase databases to filter the published studies until 17 May 2022. The meta-analyses were performed with the generic inverse-variance method with a random-effects model. Results: Fifteen studies encompassing 4942 patients were included. In the pooled analysis of fifteen studies, the patients with higher PIV levels had significantly increased risk of death than those with lower PIV levels (HR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.51−2.64, p < 0.001) and increased risk of progression or death (HR: 1.80, 95% CI: 1.39−2.32, p < 0.001). Analyses were consistent across several clinical scenarios, including non-metastatic or metastatic disease, different cut-offs (500, 400, and 300), and treatment with targeted therapy or immunotherapy (p < 0.001 for each). Conclusion: The available evidence demonstrates that PIV could be a prognostic biomarker in cancer. However, further research is needed to explore the promise of PIV as a prognostic biomarker in patients with non-metastatic disease or patients treated without immunotherapy or targeted therapy.

The Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) Intervention Alleviates Chemotherapy-Related Cognitive Impairment in Patients with Breast Cancer by Modulating Pan-Immune-Inflammation Values

Background:

The number of patients with breast cancer is increasing worldwide, resulting in a growing number of patients with chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment (CRCI), which seriously affects their quality of life. CRCI is associated with inflammatory factors and systemic inflammatory markers such as pan-immune-inflammation value (PIV) and monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), which can reflect the level of inflammation in the body. While the Managing Cancer and Living Meaningfully (CALM) intervention has been demonstrated to alleviate CRCI in patients with breast cancer, the specific mechanism remains unclear.

Objective:

This study evaluated the impact of the CALM intervention on systemic inflammation.

Methods:

Ninety patients with breast cancer with CRCI were enrolled and randomized into care as usual (CAU) and CALM intervention groups. All patients were assessed using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog), Mini-Mental State Exam (MMSE), and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) before and after the CAU/CALM intervention. The blood levels of inflammatory markers were also analyzed before and after the intervention.

Results:

Compared to the CAU group, the CALM group showed significantly improved cognitive function and significantly decreased PIV ( P < .05). PIV was significantly negatively correlated with FACT-Cog ( P < .05). The levels of other inflammatory markers, including MLR, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), granulocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (GLR), and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), were also reduced in the CALM group.

Conclusion:

PIV is an important marker of inflammation. The CALM intervention may improve the cognitive function of patients by regulating the systemic inflammation marker PIV through the neuroimmune axis.