Preoperative Prediction Power of Radiomics for Breast Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis

Intratumoral and peritumoral CT-based radiomics for predicting the microsatellite instability in gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of intratumoral and peritumoral radiomics based on contrast-enhanced computer tomography (CECT) to preoperatively predict microsatellite instability (MSI) status in gastric cancer (GC) patients.

METHODS

A total of 189 GC patients, including 63 patients with MSI-high (MSI-H) and 126 patients with MSI-low/stable (MSI-L/S), were randomly divided into the training cohort and validation cohort. Intratumoral and 5-mm peritumoral regions' radiomics features were extracted from CECT images. The features were standardized by Z-score, and the Inter- and intraclass correlation coefficient, univariate logistic regression analysis, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) were applied to select the optimal radiomics features. Radiomics scores (Rad-score) based on intratumoral regions, peritumoral regions, and intratumoral + 5-mm peritumoral regions were calculated by weighting the linear combination of the selected features with their respective coefficients to construct the intratumoral model, peritumoral model, and intratumoral + peritumoral model. Logistic regression was used to establish a combined model by combining clinical characteristics, CT semantic features, and Rad-score of intratumoral and peritumoral regions.

RESULTS

Eleven radiomics features were selected to establish a radiomics intratumoral + peritumoral model. CT-measured tumor length and tumor location were independent risk factors for MSI status. The established combined model obtained the highest area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) of 0.830 (95% CI, 0.727-0.906) in the validation cohort. The calibration curve and decision curve demonstrated its good model fitness and clinical application value.

CONCLUSION

The combined model based on intratumoral and peritumoral CECT radiomics features and clinical factors can predict the MSI status of GS with moderate accuracy before surgery, which helps formulate personalized treatment strategies.

An overview of meta-analyses on radiomics: more evidence is needed to support clinical translation

OBJECTIVE

To conduct an overview of meta-analyses of radiomics studies assessing their study quality and evidence level.

METHODS

A systematical search was updated via peer-reviewed electronic databases, preprint servers, and systematic review protocol registers until 15 November 2022. Systematic reviews with meta-analysis of primary radiomics studies were included. Their reporting transparency, methodological quality, and risk of bias were assessed by PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 checklist, AMSTAR-2 (A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews, version 2) tool, and ROBIS (Risk Of Bias In Systematic reviews) tool, respectively. The evidence level supporting the radiomics for clinical use was rated.

RESULTS

We identified 44 systematic reviews with meta-analyses on radiomics research. The mean ± standard deviation of PRISMA adherence rate was 65 ± 9%. The AMSTAR-2 tool rated 5 and 39 systematic reviews as low and critically low confidence, respectively. The ROBIS assessment resulted low, unclear and high risk in 5, 11, and 28 systematic reviews, respectively. We reperformed 53 meta-analyses in 38 included systematic reviews. There were 3, 7, and 43 meta-analyses rated as convincing, highly suggestive, and weak levels of evidence, respectively. The convincing level of evidence was rated in (1) T2-FLAIR radiomics for IDH-mutant vs IDH-wide type differentiation in low-grade glioma, (2) CT radiomics for COVID-19 vs other viral pneumonia differentiation, and (3) MRI radiomics for high-grade glioma vs brain metastasis differentiation.

CONCLUSIONS

The systematic reviews on radiomics were with suboptimal quality. A limited number of radiomics approaches were supported by convincing level of evidence.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT

The evidence supporting the clinical application of radiomics are insufficient, calling for researches translating radiomics from an academic tool to a practicable adjunct towards clinical deployment.

Diagnostic performance of radiomics in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis in breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiomics in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM) and sentinel lymph node metastasis (SLNM) in breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Multiple electronic databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before April 29, 2022: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang Data. The quality of the included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. The overall diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated to evaluate the diagnostic performance of radiomic features for lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with breast cancer. Spearman's correlation coefficient was determined to assess the threshold effect, and meta-regression and subgroup analyses were performed to explore the possible causes of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

A total of 30 studies with 5611 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled estimates suggesting overall diagnostic accuracy of radiomics in detecting LNM were determined: DOR, 23 (95% CI, 16-33); sensitivity, 0.86 (95% CI, 0.82-0.88); specificity, 0.79 (95% CI, 0.73-0.84); and AUC, 0.90 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92). The meta-analysis showed significant heterogeneity between sensitivity and specificity across the included studies, with no evidence for a threshold effect. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses showed that combined clinical factors, modeling method, region, and imaging modality (magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], ultrasound, computed tomography [CT], and X-ray mammography [MMG]) contributed to the heterogeneity in the sensitivity analysis (P < 0.05). Furthermore, modeling methods, MRI, and MMG contributed to the heterogeneity in the specificity analysis (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Our results show that radiomics has good diagnostic performance in predicting ALNM and SLNM in breast cancer. Thus, we propose this approach as a clinical method for the preoperative identification of LNM.