1
|
Rahimi R, Taylor M, Li X, Chen KL, MacLennan G, Murdoch E, Chang L, Parniani A, Wang P, Chawla A, Fan J, Kim D. Fetal dose assessment in a pregnant patient with brain tumor: A comparative study of proton PBS and 3DCRT/VMAT radiation therapy techniques. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14394. [PMID: 38887816 PMCID: PMC11302808 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14394] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2024] [Revised: 04/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The treatment of brain tumors in pregnant patients poses challenges, as the out-of-field dose exposure to the fetus can potentially be harmful. A pregnant patient with prior radiation treatment was presented with a brain tumor at our clinic. This work reports on our pre-treatment study that compared fetal dose exposure between intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) using pencil beam scanning (PBS) and conventional photon 3D conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), and the subsequent pregnant patient's radiation treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS Pre-treatment measurements of clinical plans, 3DCRT, VMAT, and IMPT, were conducted on a phantom. Measurements were performed using a device capable of neutron detections, closely following AAPM guidelines, TG158. For photon measurements, fetus shielding was utilized. On patient treatment days, which was determined to be proton treatment, shielding was used only during daily imaging for patient setup. Additionally, an in vivo measurement was conducted on the patient. RESULTS Measurements showed that IMPT delivered the lowest fetal dose, considering both photon and neutron out-of-field doses to the fetus, even when shielding was implemented for photon measurements. Additionally, the proton plans demonstrated superior treatment for the mother, a reirradiation case. CONCLUSION The patient was treated with proton therapy, and the baby was subsequently delivered at full term with no complications. This case study supports previous clinical findings and advocates for the expanded use of proton therapy in this patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robabeh Rahimi
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentInova Health SystemFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| | - Michael Taylor
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentInova Health SystemFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| | - Xing Li
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentInova Health SystemFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| | - Kuan Ling Chen
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentInova Health SystemFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| | | | - Erin Murdoch
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentInova Health SystemFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| | - Lienard Chang
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentInova Health SystemFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| | - Ashkan Parniani
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentInova Health SystemFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| | - Peng Wang
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentInova Health SystemFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| | - Ashish Chawla
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentInova Health SystemFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| | - Jiajin Fan
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentInova Health SystemFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| | - Daniel Kim
- Radiation Oncology DepartmentInova Health SystemFairfaxVirginiaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen D, Motlagh SAO, Stappen FV, Labarbe R, Bell B, Kim M, Teo BKK, Dong L, Zou W, Diffenderfer ES. Secondary neutron dosimetry for conformal FLASH proton therapy. Med Phys 2024; 51:5081-5093. [PMID: 38597815 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cyclotron-based proton therapy systems utilize the highest proton energies to achieve an ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) for FLASH radiotherapy. The deep-penetrating range associated with this high energy can be modulated by inserting a uniform plate of proton-stopping material, known as a range shifter, in the beam path at the nozzle to bring the Bragg peak within the target while ensuring high proton transport efficiency for UHDR. Aluminum has been recently proposed as a range shifter material mainly due to its high compactness and its mechanical properties. A possible drawback lies in the fact that aluminum has a larger cross-section of producing secondary neutrons compared to conventional plastic range shifters. Accordingly, an increase in secondary neutron contamination was expected during the delivery of range-modulated FLASH proton therapy, potentially heightening neutron-induced carcinogenic risks to the patient. PURPOSE We conducted neutron dosimetry using simulations and measurements to evaluate excess dose due to neutron exposure during UHDR proton irradiation with aluminum range shifters compared to plastic range shifters. METHODS Monte Carlo simulations in TOPAS were performed to investigate the secondary neutron production characteristics with aluminum range shifter during 225 MeV single-spot proton irradiation. The computational results were validated against measurements with a pair of ionization chambers in an out-of-field region ( ≤ $\le$ 30 cm) and with a Proton Recoil Scintillator-Los Alamos rem meter in a far-out-of-field region (0.5-2.5 m). The assessments were repeated with solid water slabs as a surrogate for the conventional range shifter material to evaluate the impact of aluminum on neutron yield. The results were compared with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standards to evaluate the clinical acceptance of the secondary neutron yield. RESULTS For a range modulation up to 26 cm in water, the maximum simulated and measured values of out-of-field secondary neutron dose equivalent per therapeutic dose with aluminum range shifter were found to be( 0.57 ± 0.02 ) mSv/Gy $(0.57\pm 0.02)\ \text{mSv/Gy}$ and( 0.46 ± 0.04 ) mSv/Gy $(0.46\pm 0.04)\ \text{mSv/Gy}$ , respectively, overall higher than the solid water cases (simulation:( 0.332 ± 0.003 ) mSv/Gy $(0.332\pm 0.003)\ \text{mSv/Gy}$ ; measurement:( 0.33 ± 0.03 ) mSv/Gy $(0.33\pm 0.03)\ \text{mSv/Gy}$ ). The maximum far out-of-field secondary neutron dose equivalent was found to be (8.8 ± 0.5 $8.8 \pm 0.5$ ) μ Sv / Gy $\umu {\rm Sv/Gy}$ and (1.62 ± 0.02 $1.62 \pm 0.02$ ) μ Sv / Gy $\umu {\rm Sv/Gy}$ for the simulations and rem meter measurements, respectively, also higher than the solid water counterparts (simulation: (3.3 ± 0.3 $3.3 \pm 0.3$ ) μ Sv / Gy $\umu {\rm Sv/Gy}$ ; measurement: (0.63 ± 0.03 $0.63 \pm 0.03$ ) μ Sv / Gy $\umu {\rm Sv/Gy}$ ). CONCLUSIONS We conducted simulations and measurements of secondary neutron production under proton irradiation at FLASH energy with range shifters. We found that the secondary neutron yield increased when using aluminum range shifters compared to conventional materials while remaining well below the non-primary radiation limit constrained by the IEC regulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dixin Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Rudi Labarbe
- Ion Beam Applications S.A. (IBA), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Beryl Bell
- Ion Beam Applications S.A. (IBA), Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium
| | - Michele Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Boon-Keng Kevin Teo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Lei Dong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Wei Zou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Blommaert J, De Saint‐Hubert M, Depuydt T, Oldehinkel E, Poortmans P, Amant F, Lambrecht M. Challenges and opportunities for proton therapy during pregnancy. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2024; 103:767-774. [PMID: 37491770 PMCID: PMC10993337 DOI: 10.1111/aogs.14645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Abstract
During pregnancy, the use of radiation therapy for cancer treatment is often considered impossible due to the assumed associated fetal risks. However, suboptimal treatment of pregnant cancer patients and unjustifiable delay in radiation therapy until after delivery can be harmful for both patient and child. In non-pregnant patients, proton-radiation therapy is increasingly administered because of its favorable dosimetric properties compared with photon-radiation therapy. Although data on the use of pencil beam scanning proton-radiation therapy during pregnancy are scarce, different case reports and dosimetric studies have indicated a more than 10-fold reduction in fetal radiation exposure compared with photon-radiation therapy. Nonetheless, the implementation of proton-radiation therapy during pregnancy requires complex fetal dosimetry for the neutron-dominated out-of-field radiation dose and faces a lack of clinical guidelines. Further exploration and standardization of proton-radiation therapy during pregnancy will be necessary to improve radiotherapeutic management of pregnant women with cancer and further reduce risks for their offspring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Tom Depuydt
- Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Edwin Oldehinkel
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Medical Center Groningen, University of GroningenGroningenthe Netherlands
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Radiation OncologyIridium Netwerk & University of AntwerpWilrijkBelgium
| | - Frederic Amant
- Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Gynecologic Oncology, Antoni van LeeuwenhoekNetherlands Cancer InstituteAmsterdamThe Netherlands
- Division Gynecologic OncologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| | - Maarten Lambrecht
- Department of OncologyKU LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity Hospitals LeuvenLeuvenBelgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Burahmah N, Heilbronn L. Dose Measurements at Provision Proton Therapy Center. HEALTH PHYSICS 2024; 126:252-258. [PMID: 38381973 DOI: 10.1097/hp.0000000000001796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/23/2024]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Proton therapy is an advanced method for treating cancerous tumors, and its adoption has expanded significantly in recent years. The production of high-energy protons, however, may result in the creation of secondary neutrons and gamma rays. Hence, ensuring radiation safety at proton therapy centers is crucial, with shielding playing a vital role. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the shielding implemented at the Provision Proton Therapy center in Knoxville, TN, USA. For this purpose, we measured and compared gamma ray radiation levels within the treatment room and the facility's roof. These measurements were conducted using a NaI(Tl) scintillator detector. The PHITS Monte Carlo code was used to deconvolute the incident spectrum using detector response functions. Findings reveal that the facility's shielding effectively protects the general public from gamma ray radiation, with the effective dose within the treatment room being minimal and dose on the roof was comparable to background radiation levels. However, it is important to note that this study did not address the issue of secondary neutron radiation field, which is an important aspect of dose and radiation safety in proton therapy centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Naser Burahmah
- Nuclear Engineering, University of Tennessee Knoxville College of Engineering: The University of Tennessee Knoxville Tickle College of Engineering, 863 Neyland Drive, Knoxville, TN 37996
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Geser FA, Stabilini A, Christensen JB, Muñoz ID, Yukihara EG, Jäkel O, Vedelago J. A Monte Carlo study on the secondary neutron generation by oxygen ion beams for radiotherapy and its comparison to lighter ions. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:015027. [PMID: 37995363 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0f45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
Objective.To study the secondary neutrons generated by primary oxygen beams for cancer treatment and compare the results to those from primary protons, helium, and carbon ions. This information can provide useful insight into the positioning of neutron detectors in phantom for future experimental dose assessments.Approach.Mono-energetic oxygen beams and spread-out Bragg peaks were simulated using the Monte Carlo particle transport codesFLUktuierende KAskade, tool for particle simulation, and Monte Carlo N-Particle, with energies within the therapeutic range. The energy and angular distribution of the secondary neutrons were quantified.Main results.The secondary neutron spectra generated by primary oxygen beams present the same qualitative trend as for other primary ions. The energy distributions resemble continuous spectra with one peak in the thermal/epithermal region, and one other peak in the fast/relativistic region, with the most probable energy ranging from 94 up to 277 MeV and maximum energies exceeding 500 MeV. The angular distribution of the secondary neutrons is mainly downstream-directed for the fast/relativistic energies, whereas the thermal/epithermal neutrons present a more isotropic propagation. When comparing the four different primary ions, there is a significant increase in the most probable energy as well as the number of secondary neutrons per primary particle when increasing the mass of the primaries.Significance.Most previous studies have only presented results of secondary neutrons generated by primary proton beams. In this work, secondary neutrons generated by primary oxygen beams are presented, and the obtained energy and angular spectra are added as supplementary material. Furthermore, a comparison of the secondary neutron generation by the different primary ions is given, which can be used as the starting point for future studies on treatment plan comparison and secondary neutron dose optimisation. The distal penumbra after the maximum dose deposition appears to be a suitable location for in-phantom dose assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico A Geser
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Forschungsstrasse 111, Villigen PSI 5232, Switzerland
| | - Alberto Stabilini
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Forschungsstrasse 111, Villigen PSI 5232, Switzerland
| | - Jeppe B Christensen
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Forschungsstrasse 111, Villigen PSI 5232, Switzerland
| | - Iván D Muñoz
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 226, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eduardo G Yukihara
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Forschungsstrasse 111, Villigen PSI 5232, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
| | - José Vedelago
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tjelta J, Ytre-Hauge K, Lyngholm E, Handeland A, Henjum H, Stokkevåg C. Dose exposure to an adult present in the treatment room during pediatric pencil beam scanning proton therapy. Acta Oncol 2023; 62:1531-1535. [PMID: 37676843 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2023.2254924] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Tjelta
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | | | - Erlend Lyngholm
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Andreas Handeland
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Helge Henjum
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Camilla Stokkevåg
- Department of Oncology and Medical Physics, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
- Department of Physics and Technology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kuznetsova DR, Gabdullina DA, Makhmudova AF, Bochkina EV, Platonova EO, Zhirnov BO, Akhmetgareeva EE, Atangulova LS, Shein RS, Rakhimova KI, Pakalnis VV, Ganieva ER. Pediatric Brain Tumor Risk Associated with Head Computed Tomography: Systematic Literature Review. CURRENT PEDIATRICS 2023. [DOI: 10.15690/vsp.v22i1.2506] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/12/2023]
Abstract
Computed tomography (CT) of the brain has changed diagnostic neuroradiology significantly over the past 50 years since it was firstly used back in 1971 to visualize suspected frontal lobe tumour. The safety of head CT is determined by the small amount of radiation and the low sensibility of brain tissue to cytotoxic damage due to ionizing radiation compared to other organs. However, some population groups may be at increased risk. Thus, children are more susceptible to radiation cancer than adults and lifelong attributive risk (LAR) can be more than 10 times higher for an infant than for a middle-aged adult. The authors have reviewed published studies that examined the prevalence and mortality of intracranial tumors in children undergoing head CT in comparison to unaffected individuals. Electronic search of publications in the PubMed database from 1966 to date was carried out. We have carried out intersectoral search for documents containing keywords or medical subject headings (MeSH) related to three wide categories: 1) computed tomography, 2) radiation-induced tumors, 3) risk, morbidity or epidemiology. Further search was performed in manual mode. Available epidemiological data generally confirmed correlation between head CT and tumor growth induction. Thus, current epidemiological data accept the opinion that the risk of tumor induction associated with head CT in children is very small (one tumor per 3,000–10,000 studies). The minimal estimated risk of tumor induction due to head CT in children is mostly offset by its diagnostic imaging benefits considering the clinical indications to minimize radiation dose. Understanding and quantitative risk assessment of carcinogenesis associated with CT imaging led to dose reduction in pediatric CT protocols. This trend should continue and should be implemented in all age groups. Although the decision to perform head CT is often undeniable (injury or hemorrhage), careful assessment of studies frequency is required, especially in patients who need disease monitoring. Cumulative effect in such cases may increase the minimal risk of carcinogenesis. Larger and advanced epidemiological studies are required to better understand these risks.
Collapse
|