1
|
Stengl C, Muñoz ID, Arbes E, Rauth E, Christensen JB, Vedelago J, Runz A, Jäkel O, Seco J. Dosimetric study for breathing-induced motion effects in an abdominal pancreas phantom for carbon ion mini-beam radiotherapy. Med Phys 2024. [PMID: 38631000 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Particle mini-beam therapy exhibits promise in sparing healthy tissue through spatial fractionation, particularly notable for heavy ions, further enhancing the already favorable differential biological effectiveness at both target and entrance regions. However, breathing-induced organ motion affects particle mini-beam irradiation schemes since the organ displacements exceed the mini-beam structure dimensions, decreasing the advantages of spatial fractionation. PURPOSE In this study, the impact of breathing-induced organ motion on the dose distribution was examined at the target and organs at risk(OARs) during carbon ion mini-beam irradiation for pancreatic cancer. METHODS As a first step, the carbon ion mini-beam pattern was characterized with Monte Carlo simulations. To analyze the impact of breathing-induced organ motion on the dose distribution of a virtual pancreas tumor as target and related OARs, the anthropomorphic Pancreas Phantom for Ion beam Therapy (PPIeT) was irradiated with carbon ions. A mini-beam collimator was used to deliver a spatially fractionated dose distribution. During irradiation, varying breathing motion amplitudes were induced, ranging from 5 to 15 mm. Post-irradiation, the 2D dose pattern was analyzed, focusing on the full width at half maximum (FWHM), center-to-center distance (ctc), and the peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR). RESULTS The mini-beam pattern was visible within OARs, while in the virtual pancreas tumor a more homogeneous dose distribution was achieved. Applied motion affected the mini-beam pattern within the kidney, one of the OARs, reducing the PVDR from 3.78 ± $\pm$ 0.12 to 1.478 ± $\pm$ 0.070 for the 15 mm motion amplitude. In the immobile OARs including the spine and the skin at the back, the PVDR did not change within 3.4% comparing reference and motion conditions. CONCLUSIONS This study provides an initial understanding of how breathing-induced organ motion affects spatial fractionation during carbon ion irradiation, using an anthropomorphic phantom. A decrease in the PVDR was observed in the right kidney when breathing-induced motion was applied, potentially increasing the risk of damage to OARs. Therefore, further studies are needed to explore the clinical viability of mini-beam radiotherapy with carbon ions when irradiating abdominal regions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Stengl
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Iván D Muñoz
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eric Arbes
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Evelyn Rauth
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jeppe B Christensen
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland
| | - José Vedelago
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Armin Runz
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Muñoz ID, García-Calderón D, Felix-Bautista R, Burigo LN, Christensen JB, Brons S, Runz A, Häring P, Greilich S, Seco J, Jäkel O. Linear Energy Transfer Measurements and Estimation of Relative Biological Effectiveness in Proton and Helium Ion Beams Using Fluorescent Nuclear Track Detectors. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00357-2. [PMID: 38437925 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.02.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 03/06/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Our objective was to develop a methodology for assessing the linear energy transfer (LET) and relative biological effectiveness (RBE) in clinical proton and helium ion beams using fluorescent nuclear track detectors (FNTDs). METHODS AND MATERIALS FNTDs were exposed behind solid water to proton and helium (4He) ion spread-out Bragg peaks. Detectors were imaged with a confocal microscope, and the LET spectra were derived from the fluorescence intensity. The track- and dose-averaged LET (LETF and LETD, respectively) were calculated from the LET spectra. LET measurements were used as input on RBE models to estimate the RBE. Human alveolar adenocarcinoma cells (A549) were exposed at the same positions as the FNTDs. The RBE was calculated from the resulting survival curves. All measurements were compared with Monte Carlo simulations. RESULTS For protons, average relative differences between measurements and simulations were 6% and 19% for LETF and LETD, respectively. For helium ions, the same differences were 11% for both quantities. The position of the experimental LET spectra primary peaks agreed with the simulations within 9% and 14% for protons and helium ions, respectively. For the RBE models using LETD as input, FNTD-based RBE values ranged from 1.02 ± 0.01 to 1.25 ± 0.04 and from 1.08 ± 0.09 to 2.68 ± 1.26 for protons and helium ions, respectively. The average relative differences between these values and simulations were 2% and 4%. For A549 cells, the RBE ranged from 1.05 ± 0.07 to 1.47 ± 0.09 and from 0.89 ± 0.06 to 3.28 ± 0.20 for protons and helium ions, respectively. Regarding the RBE-weighted dose (2.0 Gy at the spread-out Bragg peak), the differences between simulations and measurements were below 0.10 Gy. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates for the first time that FNTDs can be used to perform direct LET measurements and to estimate the RBE in clinical proton and helium ion beams.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iván D Muñoz
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - Daniel García-Calderón
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Renato Felix-Bautista
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Lucas N Burigo
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jeppe Brage Christensen
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Villigen, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Brons
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Armin Runz
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Häring
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Steffen Greilich
- Berthold Technologies GmbH & Co KG, Units of Radiation Protection and Bioanalytics, Bad Wildbad, Germany
| | - Joao Seco
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany; Division of Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany; Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Geser FA, Stabilini A, Christensen JB, Muñoz ID, Yukihara EG, Jäkel O, Vedelago J. A Monte Carlo study on the secondary neutron generation by oxygen ion beams for radiotherapy and its comparison to lighter ions. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:015027. [PMID: 37995363 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0f45] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Accepted: 11/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
Objective.To study the secondary neutrons generated by primary oxygen beams for cancer treatment and compare the results to those from primary protons, helium, and carbon ions. This information can provide useful insight into the positioning of neutron detectors in phantom for future experimental dose assessments.Approach.Mono-energetic oxygen beams and spread-out Bragg peaks were simulated using the Monte Carlo particle transport codesFLUktuierende KAskade, tool for particle simulation, and Monte Carlo N-Particle, with energies within the therapeutic range. The energy and angular distribution of the secondary neutrons were quantified.Main results.The secondary neutron spectra generated by primary oxygen beams present the same qualitative trend as for other primary ions. The energy distributions resemble continuous spectra with one peak in the thermal/epithermal region, and one other peak in the fast/relativistic region, with the most probable energy ranging from 94 up to 277 MeV and maximum energies exceeding 500 MeV. The angular distribution of the secondary neutrons is mainly downstream-directed for the fast/relativistic energies, whereas the thermal/epithermal neutrons present a more isotropic propagation. When comparing the four different primary ions, there is a significant increase in the most probable energy as well as the number of secondary neutrons per primary particle when increasing the mass of the primaries.Significance.Most previous studies have only presented results of secondary neutrons generated by primary proton beams. In this work, secondary neutrons generated by primary oxygen beams are presented, and the obtained energy and angular spectra are added as supplementary material. Furthermore, a comparison of the secondary neutron generation by the different primary ions is given, which can be used as the starting point for future studies on treatment plan comparison and secondary neutron dose optimisation. The distal penumbra after the maximum dose deposition appears to be a suitable location for in-phantom dose assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico A Geser
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Forschungsstrasse 111, Villigen PSI 5232, Switzerland
| | - Alberto Stabilini
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Forschungsstrasse 111, Villigen PSI 5232, Switzerland
| | - Jeppe B Christensen
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Forschungsstrasse 111, Villigen PSI 5232, Switzerland
| | - Iván D Muñoz
- Department of Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 226, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eduardo G Yukihara
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Forschungsstrasse 111, Villigen PSI 5232, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Heidelberg (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
| | - José Vedelago
- Department of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Stengl C, Panow K, Arbes E, Muñoz ID, Christensen JB, Neelsen C, Dinkel F, Weidner A, Runz A, Johnen W, Liermann J, Echner G, Vedelago J, Jäkel O. A phantom to simulate organ motion and its effect on dose distribution in carbon ion therapy for pancreatic cancer. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68:245013. [PMID: 37918022 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad0902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023]
Abstract
Objective. Carbon ion radiotherapy is a promising radiation technique for malignancies like pancreatic cancer. However, organs' motion imposes challenges for achieving homogeneous dose delivery. In this study, an anthropomorphicPancreasPhantom forIon-beamTherapy (PPIeT) was developed to simulate breathing and gastrointestinal motion during radiotherapy.Approach. The developed phantom contains a pancreas, two kidneys, a duodenum, a spine and a spinal cord. The shell of the organs was 3D printed and filled with agarose-based mixtures. Hounsfield Units (HU) of PPIeTs' organs were measured by CT. The pancreas motion amplitude in cranial-caudal (CC) direction was evaluated from patients' 4D CT data. Motions within the obtained range were simulated and analyzed in PPIeT using MRI. Additionally, GI motion was mimicked by changing the volume of the duodenum and quantified by MRI. A patient-like treatment plan was calculated for carbon ions, and the phantom was irradiated in a static and moving condition. Dose measurements in the organs were performed using an ionization chamber and dosimetric films.Main results. PPIeT presented tissue equivalent HU and reproducible breathing-induced CC displacements of the pancreas between (3.98 ± 0.36) mm and a maximum of (18.19 ± 0.44) mm. The observed maximum change in distance of (14.28 ± 0.12) mm between pancreas and duodenum was consistent with findings in patients. Carbon ion irradiation revealed homogenous coverage of the virtual tumor at the pancreas in static condition with a 1% deviation from the treatment plan. Instead, the dose delivery during motion with the maximum amplitude yielded an underdosage of 21% at the target and an increased uncertainty by two orders of magnitude.Significance. A dedicated phantom was designed and developed for breathing motion assessment of dose deposition during carbon ion radiotherapy. PPIeT is a unique tool for dose verification in the pancreas and its organs at risk during end-to-end tests.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Stengl
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Kathrin Panow
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Eric Arbes
- Biomedical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 226, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
| | - Iván D Muñoz
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department for Physics and Astronomy, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 226, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
| | - Jeppe B Christensen
- Department of Radiation Safety and Security, Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI), Forschungsstrasse 111, Villigen PSI 5232, Switzerland
| | - Christian Neelsen
- Department of Radiology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, Berlin D-10117, Germany
| | - Fabian Dinkel
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Artur Weidner
- Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Im Neuenheimer Feld 672, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Armin Runz
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wibke Johnen
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jakob Liermann
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Im Neuenheimer Feld 460, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Gernot Echner
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - José Vedelago
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO), National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO), Heidelberg, Germany
- Heidelberg Ion-Beam Therapy Center (HIT), Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Im Neuenheimer Feld 450, Heidelberg D-69120, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Muñoz ID, Burigo LN, Gehrke T, Brons S, Greilich S, Jäkel O. Sensitivity correction of Fluorescent Nuclear Track Detectors using alpha particles: Determining LET spectra of light ions with enhanced accuracy. Med Phys 2022; 50:2385-2401. [PMID: 36345603 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radiation fields encountered in proton therapy (PT) and ion-beam therapy (IBT) are characterized by a variable linear energy transfer (LET), which lead to a variation of relative biological effectiveness and also affect the response of certain dosimeters. Therefore, reliable tools to measure LET are advantageous to predict and correct LET effects. Fluorescent nuclear track detectors (FNTDs) are suitable to measure LET spectra within the range of interest for PT and IBT, but so far the accuracy and precision have been challenged by sensitivity variations between individual crystals. PURPOSE To develop a novel methodology to correct changes in the fluorescent intensity due to sensitivity variations among FNTDs. This methodology is based on exposing FNTDs to alpha particles in order to derive a detector-specific correction factor. This will allow us to improve the accuracy and precision of LET spectra measurements with FNTDs. METHODS FNTDs were exposed to alpha particles. Afterward, the detectors were irradiated to monoenergetic protons, 4 He-, 12 C-, and 16 O-ions. At each step, the detectors were imaged with a confocal laser scanning microscope. The tracks were reconstructed and analyzed using in-house developed tools. Alpha-particle tracks were used to derive a detector-specific sensitivity correction factor ( k s , i ${k_{s,i}}$ ). Proton, 4 He-, 12 C-, and 16 O-ion tracks were used to establish a traceable calibration curve that relates the fluorescence intensity with the LET in water ( L E T H 2 O $LE{T_{{{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{O}}}}$ ). FNTDs from a second batch were exposed and analyzed following the same procedures, to test if k s , i ${k_{s,i}}$ can be used to extend the applicability of the calibration curve to detectors from different batches. Finally, a set of blind tests was performed to assess the accuracy of the proposed methodology without user bias. Throughout all stages, the main sources of uncertainty were evaluated. RESULTS Based on a sample of 100 FNTDs, our findings show a high sensitivity heterogeneity between FNTDs, with k s , i ${k_{s,i}}$ having values between 0.57 and 2.55. The fitting quality of the calibration curve, characterized by the mean absolute percentage residuals and correlation coefficient, was improved when k s , i ${k_{s,i}}$ was considered. Results for detectors from the second batch show that, if the fluorescence signal is corrected by k s , i ${k_{s,i}}$ , the differences in the predicted L E T H 2 O $LE{T_{{{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{O}}}}$ with respect to the reference set are reduced from 55%, 141%, 41%, and 186% to 4.2%, 6.5%, 5.0%, and 11.0%, for protons, 4 He-, 12 C-, and 16 O-ions, respectively. The blind tests showed that it is possible to measure the track- and dose-average L E T H 2 O $LE{T_{{{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{O}}}}$ with an accuracy of 0.3%, 16%, and 9.6% and 1.7%, 28%, and 30% for protons, 12 C-ions and mixed beams, respectively. On average, the combined uncertainty of the measured L E T H 2 O $LE{T_{{{\rm{H}}_2}{\rm{O}}}}$ was 11%, 13%, 21%, and 26% for protons, 4 He-, 12 C-, and 16 O-ions, respectively. These values were increased by a mean factor of 2.0 when k s , i ${k_{s,i}}$ was not applied. CONCLUSIONS We have demonstrated for the first time that alpha particles can be used to derive a detector-specific sensitivity correction factor. The proposed methodology allows us to measure LET spectra using FNTD-technology, with a degree of accuracy and precision unreachable before with sole experimental approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iván D. Muñoz
- Department of Physics and Astronomy Ruprecht‐Karl University of Heidelberg Im Neuenheimer Feld 226 Heidelberg D‐69120 Germany
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 Heidelberg D‐69120 Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO) Heidelberg Germany
| | - Lucas N. Burigo
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 Heidelberg D‐69120 Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO) Heidelberg Germany
| | - Tim Gehrke
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 Heidelberg D‐69120 Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO) Heidelberg Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg D‐69120 Germany
| | - Stephan Brons
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO) Heidelberg Germany
- Heidelberg Ion‐Beam Therapy Center (HIT) Department of Radiation Oncology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg D‐69120 Germany
| | - Steffen Greilich
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 Heidelberg D‐69120 Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO) Heidelberg Germany
| | - Oliver Jäkel
- Division of Medical Physics in Radiation Oncology German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ) Im Neuenheimer Feld 280 Heidelberg D‐69120 Germany
- Heidelberg Institute for Radiation Oncology (HIRO) National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology (NCRO) Heidelberg Germany
- Heidelberg Ion‐Beam Therapy Center (HIT) Department of Radiation Oncology Heidelberg University Hospital Heidelberg D‐69120 Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vedelago J, Geser FA, Muñoz ID, Stabilini A, Yukihara EG, Jaekel O. Assessment of secondary neutrons in particle therapy by Monte Carlo simulations. Phys Med Biol 2021; 67. [PMID: 34905742 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ac431b] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study is to estimate the energy and angular distribution of secondary neutrons inside a phantom in hadron therapy, which will support decisions on detector choice and experimental setup design for in-phantom secondary neutron measurements. APPROACH Dedicated Monte Carlo simulations were implemented, considering clinically relevant energies of protons, helium and carbon ions. Since scored quantities can vary from different radiation transport models, the codes FLUKA, TOPAS and MCNP were used. The geometry of an active scanning beam delivery system for heavy ion treatment was implemented, and simulations of pristine and spread-out Bragg peaks were carried out. Previous studies, focused on specific ion types or single energies, are qualitatively in agreement with the obtained results. MAIN RESULTS The secondary neutrons energy distributions present a continuous spectrum with two peaks, one centred on the thermal/epithermal region, and one on the high-energy region, with the most probable energy ranging from 19 MeV up to 240 MeV, depending on the ion type and its initial energy. The simulations show that the secondary neutron energies may exceed 400 MeV and, therefore, suitable neutron detectors for this energy range shall be needed. Additionally, the angular distribution of the low energy neutrons is quite isotropic, whereas the fast/relativistic neutrons are mainly scattered in the down-stream direction. SIGNIFICANCE It would be possible to minimize the influence of the heavy ions when measuring the neutron-generated recoil protons by selecting appropriate measurement positions within the phantom. Although there are discrepancies among the three Monte Carlo codes, the results agree qualitatively and in order of magnitude, being sufficient to support further investigations with the ultimate goal of mapping the secondary neutron doses both in- and out-of-field in hadrontherapy. The obtained secondary neutron spectra are available as supplementary material.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- José Vedelago
- German Cancer Research Centre, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, 69120, GERMANY
| | - Federico A Geser
- Paul Scherrer Institut, Forschungsstrasse 111, Villigen PSI, 5232, SWITZERLAND
| | - Iván D Muñoz
- German Cancer Research Centre, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, 69120, GERMANY
| | - Alberto Stabilini
- Paul Scherrer Institut, Forschungsstrasse 111, Villigen PSI, 5235, SWITZERLAND
| | - Eduardo G Yukihara
- Paul Scherrer Institut, Forschungsstrasse 111, Villigen PSI, 5232, SWITZERLAND
| | - Oliver Jaekel
- German Cancer Research Centre, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, Heidelberg, 69120, GERMANY
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sánchez-Nieto B, López-Pineda E, Ruiz-Trejo C, Muñoz ID, Caprile P, Chorbadjian G, Brandan ME. Dedicated phantom and TLD-100 dosimetry for simultaneous determination of mean glandular dose and beam quality: Proposal for a compact mammography quality control procedure. Phys Med 2019; 60:30-36. [PMID: 31000083 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2019.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2018] [Revised: 01/24/2019] [Accepted: 03/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- B Sánchez-Nieto
- Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
| | - E López-Pineda
- Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04511 Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - C Ruiz-Trejo
- Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04511 Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - I D Muñoz
- Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04511 Ciudad de México, Mexico
| | - P Caprile
- Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - G Chorbadjian
- Instituto de Física, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile; Subdepartamento de Salud Radiológica, Departamento de Dispositivos Médicos, Instituto de Salud Pública de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - M E Brandan
- Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04511 Ciudad de México, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Muñoz ID, Gamboa-deBuen I, Avila O, Brandan ME. Dosimetry in a mammography phantom using TLD-300 dosimeters. Med Phys 2018; 45:4287-4296. [PMID: 29989176 DOI: 10.1002/mp.13084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2017] [Revised: 06/25/2018] [Accepted: 06/27/2018] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate the photon field effective energy (Eeff ) distribution and percentage depth-dose (PDD) within a mammography phantom by the analysis of the CaF2 :Tm (TLD-300) thermoluminescent (TL) glow curve. The experimental procedure involves the use of TLD-300 to determine with single dosimeter exposures both the relative dose and the beam quality. METHODS TLD-300 chips were exposed to x rays from a GE Senographe 2000D mammography unit at the surface and different depths within a BR12 phantom. X-ray beams were generated with Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, and Rh/Rh anode/filter combinations and voltages between 25 and 34 kV. Glow curves were deconvoluted into component peaks and the high- to low-temperature ratio (HLTR) was evaluated. The photon field Eeff was obtained from the HLTR values using a calibration curve determined previously. PDD was established from the peak 5 TL signal (TLSP5 ) at depths between 0.0 and 3.5 cm inside the phantom. Taking into account the differences in density and composition between CaF2 :Tm and breast tissue, an energy-dependent correction factor (β(E)) was applied to TLSP5 . Measurements were compared with radiation transport Monte Carlo (MC) simulations performed with PENELOPE-2008. RESULTS A typical 5% change in the HLTR from the phantom top surface to 3.5 cm depth was measured, which corresponds to a 2.2 keV increase in photon field Eeff . Values of the β(E) correction factor were 0.33 and 0.13 for Eeff equal to 15.1 and 22.5 keV, respectively. This strong energy dependence of β(E) is mostly due to the differences in fluence attenuation between CaF2 and breast tissue. According to PDD measurements, dose decreased to half the surface value at depths between 0.7 and 1.0 cm for Mo/Mo/25 and Rh/Rh/34 beams, respectively. Values of PDD, less than 10% at 3.5 cm depth, would have been overestimated by about 3.5% (a large relative error) if an energy-independent correction factor had been assumed. Mean differences between experiments and MC simulations were 0.8 keV and 1.2% in the determination of Eeff and PDD, respectively. CONCLUSION The TLD-300 glow curve was used to accurately measure the photon field Eeff and PDD within a mammographic phantom. This work has demonstrated that Eeff and dose can be established simultaneously by using solely TLD-300.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I D Muñoz
- Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - I Gamboa-deBuen
- Instituto de Ciencias Nucleares, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - O Avila
- Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Nucleares, 11801, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - M E Brandan
- Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Muñoz ID, Avila O, Gamboa-deBuen I, Brandan ME. Evolution of the CaF₂:Tm (TLD-300) glow curve as an indicator of beam quality for low-energy photon beams. Phys Med Biol 2015; 60:2135-44. [PMID: 25683355 DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/60/6/2135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
We study the high- to low- temperature signal ratio (HLTR) of the CaF2:Tm glow curve as a function of beam quality for low-energy photon beams with effective energy between 15.2 and 33.6 keV, generated with W, Mo and Rh anodes. CaF2:Tm dosemeters (TLD-300) were exposed to x-rays and (60)Co gamma-rays. Glow curves were deconvoluted into 7 peaks, using computerized glow curve deconvolution and HLTR was evaluated. Air kerma and dose in water were between 2.1-15.0 mGy and 49.8-373.8 mGy, respectively. All peaks in the glow curve showed a linear response with respect to air kerma and dose in water. HLTR values decreased monotonically between 1.029 ± 0.010 (at 15.2 keV) and 0.821 ± 0.011 (33.6 keV), and no effects due to the use of different anode/filter combinations were observed. The results indicate a relatively high value of HLTR (about 1 for 17 keV effective energy, or 3 keV μm(-1) track-average LET) and a measurable dependence on the photon beam quality. Comparison of these photon data with HLTR for ions shows good quantitative agreement. The reported evolution of the CaF2:Tm glow curve could facilitate the estimation of the effective energy of unknown photon fields by this technique.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I D Muñoz
- Instituto de Física, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, 04510 DF, Mexico
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|