Safety and Efficacy of Sintilimab and Anlotinib as First Line Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (KEEP-G04): A Single-Arm Phase 2 Study

Anlotinib potentiates anti-PD1 immunotherapy via transferrin receptor-dependent CD8+ T-cell infiltration in hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The therapeutic potential of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) extends across various cancers; however, its effectiveness in treating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is frequently curtailed by both inherent and developed resistance.

OBJECTIVE

This research explored the effectiveness of integrating anlotinib (a broad-spectrum tyrosine kinase inhibitor) with programmed death-1 (PD-1) blockade and offers mechanistic insights into more effective strategies for treating HCC.

METHODS

Using patient-derived organotypic tissue spheroids and orthotopic HCC mouse models, we assessed the effectiveness of anlotinib combined with PD-1 blockade. The impact on the tumour immune microenvironment and underlying mechanisms were assessed using time-of-flight mass cytometry, RNA sequencing, and proteomics across cell lines, mouse models, and HCC patient samples.

RESULTS

The combination of anlotinib with an anti-PD-1 antibody enhanced the immune response against HCC in preclinical models. Anlotinib remarkably suppressed the expression of transferrin receptor (TFRC) via the VEGFR2/AKT/HIF-1α signaling axis. CD8+ T-cell infiltration into the tumour microenvironment correlated with low expression of TFRC. Anlotinib additionally increased the levels of the chemokine CXCL14, crucial for attracting CD8+ T cells. CXCL14 emerged as a downstream effector of TFRC, exhibiting elevated expression following the silencing of TFRC. Importantly, low TFRC expression was also associated with a better prognosis, enhanced sensitivity to combination therapy, and a favourable response to anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with HCC.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight anlotinib's potential to augment the efficacy of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy in HCC by targeting TFRC and enhancing CXCL14-mediated CD8+ T-cell infiltration. This study contributes to developing novel therapeutic strategies for HCC, emphasizing the role of precision medicine in oncology.

HIGHLIGHTS

Synergistic effects of anlotinib and anti-PD-1 immunotherapy demonstrated in HCC preclinical models. Anlotinib inhibits TFRC expression via the VEGFR2/AKT/HIF-1α pathway. CXCL14 upregulation via TFRC suppression boosts CD8+ T-cell recruitment. TFRC emerges as a potential biomarker for evaluating prognosis and predicting response to anti-PD-1-based therapies in advanced HCC patients.

Developing targeted therapeutics for hepatocellular carcinoma: a critical assessment of promising phase II agents

INTRODUCTION

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer worldwide and the first for primary liver tumors. In recent years greater therapeutic advancement was represented by employment of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) either in monotherapy or in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

AREAS COVERED

Major attention was given to target therapies in the last couple of years, especially in those currently under phase II trials. Priority was given either to combinations of novel ICI and TKIs or those targeting alternative mutations of major carcinogenic pathways.

EXPERT OPINION

As TKIs are playing a more crucial role in HCC therapeutic strategies, it is fundamental to further expand molecular testing and monitoring of acquired resistances. Despite the recent advancement in both laboratory and clinical studies, further research is necessary to face the discrepancy in clinical practice.

Toxicity of immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitor combinations in solid tumours: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) can be associated with significant toxicity. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the toxicity of combination treatment of ICIs with TKIs (ICI + TKI) in clinical trials with solid organ malignancies. Our primary endpoint explored the incidence of grade 3 - 5 (G3-5) treatment-related toxicity and our secondary endpoints included the incidence of toxicity by treatment type, disease type and studies with run-in strategies. A total of 9750 abstracts were identified, of which 72 eligible studies were included. The most common disease types were non-small cell lung cancer (n=8, 11.1%), renal cell carcinoma (n=10, 13.8%) and hepatobiliary cancers (n=10, 13.8%). The overall incidence of G3-5 toxicity was 56% (95% CI = 50% - 61%). The most common TKIs combined with ICIs in this analysis were multi-targeted TKIs (n = 52, 72%), VEGF specific (n = 9, 12.5%), or oncogene-targeting TKIs (EGFR, ALK, BRAF, MEK) (n =11, 15.3%). Oncogene-targeted TKIs were associated a higher incidence of rashes and immune related adverse events (irAEs) and lower incidence of hypertension. In studies which used a TKI 'run-in' to mitigate toxicity, the pooled estimate of G3-5 toxicity was 71% (95% CI 57-81%). Almost half of studies (48%) omitted the incidence of G3-5 irAEs. Our work suggests that the majority of patients who receive ICI-TKI combinations will experience high grade toxicity (G3-G5) and that toxicity may be specific to TKI partner (Oncogene targeted TKIs: Rash, irAEs; VEGF/Multitargeted: Hypertension). These data did not suggest that a TKI 'run-in' was associated with a lower incidence of G3-5 toxicity. Reporting of irAEs was inconsistent supporting the need for harmonisation of adverse event reporting to include onset, duration and treatment.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42022367416.

Small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors approved for systemic therapy of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: recent advances and future perspectives

Liver cancer is the sixth most commonly diagnosed cancer and the third leading cause of cancer death in the world, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of liver cancer. More than half of the HCC patients are diagnosed at an advanced stage and often require systemic therapy. Dysregulation of the activity of receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) is involved in the development and progress of HCC, RTKs are therefore the potential targets for systemic therapy of advanced HCC (aHCC). Currently, a total of six small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been approved for aHCC, including first-line sorafenib, lenvatinib, and donafenib, and second-line regorafenib, cabozantinib, and apatinib. These TKIs improved patients survival, which are associated with disease stage, etiology, liver function, tumor burden, baseline levels of alpha-fetoprotein, and treatment history. This review focuses on the clinical outcomes of these TKIs in key clinical trials, retrospective and real-world studies and discusses the future perspectives of TKIs for aHCC, with an aim to provide up-to-date evidence for decision-making in the treatment of aHCC.

Anlotinib plus Sintilimab achieved in an antitumor effect of complete remission in a patient with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a case report

Systemic therapies-based combination treatments have been developed rapidly in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, there are still a few patients not applicable to any recommended therapies, making it considerable to try new therapeutic options. Among them, anlotinib, a new oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is being widely used for many advanced malignancies. We present the first case of the antitumor effect of complete remission by anlotinib combined with an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, sintilimab, in a patient with advanced HCC. In April 2020, a 51-year-old male patient was diagnosed with large HCC and underwent hepatectomy with R0 resection. Two months later, he was admitted to our hospital because of a tumor relapse with multiple liver and lung metastases. After the failure of comprehensive treatment containing sorafenib, camrelizumab and transhepatic arterial chemotherapy and embolization, 2 months after tumor relapse, the patient started to receive anlotinib and sintilimab. The multiple tumor nodules were remarkable repressed both in the liver and lung. Six months after anlotinib plus sintilimab treatment, there were no residual tumors, and the alpha-fetoprotein level was decreased from 2310.9 mg/L to normal. Also, the patient continued to receive anlotinib to date. In subsequent follow-up visits until now, there was no sign of recurrence found on imaging. Anlotinib is a promising alternative for patients insensitive to the first-line targeted drugs. More clinical studies should be conducted to further broaden the clinical indications of anlotinib and immunotherapy in patients with HCC.

New clinical trial design in precision medicine: discovery, development and direction

In the era of precision medicine, it has been increasingly recognized that individuals with a certain disease are complex and different from each other. Due to the underestimation of the significant heterogeneity across participants in traditional "one-size-fits-all" trials, patient-centered trials that could provide optimal therapy customization to individuals with specific biomarkers were developed including the basket, umbrella, and platform trial designs under the master protocol framework. In recent years, the successive FDA approval of indications based on biomarker-guided master protocol designs has demonstrated that these new clinical trials are ushering in tremendous opportunities. Despite the rapid increase in the number of basket, umbrella, and platform trials, the current clinical and research understanding of these new trial designs, as compared with traditional trial designs, remains limited. The majority of the research focuses on methodologies, and there is a lack of in-depth insight concerning the underlying biological logic of these new clinical trial designs. Therefore, we provide this comprehensive review of the discovery and development of basket, umbrella, and platform trials and their underlying logic from the perspective of precision medicine. Meanwhile, we discuss future directions on the potential development of these new clinical design in view of the "Precision Pro", "Dynamic Precision", and "Intelligent Precision". This review would assist trial-related researchers to enhance the innovation and feasibility of clinical trial designs by expounding the underlying logic, which be essential to accelerate the progression of precision medicine.

New Opportunities in the Systemic Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma-Today and Tomorrow

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer. Liver cirrhosis, hepatitis B, hepatitis C, and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease represent major risk factors of HCC. Multiple different treatment options are available, depending on the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) algorithm. Systemic treatment is reserved for certain patients in stages B and C, who will not benefit from regional treatment methods. In the last fifteen years, the arsenal of available therapeutics has largely expanded, which improved treatment outcomes. Nevertheless, not all patients respond to these agents and novel combinations and drugs are needed. In this review, we aim to summarize the pathway of trials investigating the safety and efficacy of targeted therapeutics and immunotherapies since the introduction of sorafenib. Furthermore, we discuss the current evidence regarding resistance mechanisms and potential novel targets in the treatment of advanced HCC.

The causality between CD8+NKT cells and CD16-CD56 on NK cells with hepatocellular carcinoma: a Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), which is featured with high morbidity and mortality worldwide, is a primary malignant tumor of the liver. Recently, there is a wealth of supporting evidence revealing that NK cell-related immune traits are strongly associated with the development of HCC, but the causality between them has not been proven.

METHODS

Two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study was performed to probe the causal correlation between NK cell-related immune traits and HCC. Genetic variations in NK cell-related immune traits were extracted from recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of individuals with European blood lineage. HCC data were derived from the UK Biobank Consortium's GWAS summary count data, including a total of 372,184 female and male subjects, with 168 cases and 372,016 controls, all of whom are of European ancestry. Sensitivity analysis was mainly used for heterogeneity and pleiotropy testing.

RESULTS

Our research indicated the causality between NK cell-related immune traits and HCC. Importantly, CD8+NKT cells had protective causal effects on HCC (OR = 0.9996;95%CI,0.9993-0.9999; P = 0.0489). CD16-CD56 caused similar effects on NK cells (OR = 0.9997;95%CI,0.9996-0.9999; P = 0.0117) as CD8+NKT cells. Intercepts from Egger showed no pleiotropy and confounding factors. Furthermore, insufficient evidence was found to support the existence of heterogeneity by Cochran's Q test.

CONCLUSION

MR analysis suggested that low CD8+NKT cells and CD16-CD56 expression on NK cells were linked with a higher risk of HCC.

Anlotinib Combined With Toripalimab as First-Line Therapy for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective, Multicenter, Phase II Study

BACKGROUND

For patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the first-line therapeutic options are still relatively limited, and treatment outcomes remain poor. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with toripalimab as first-line therapy for unresectable HCC.

METHODS

In this single-arm, multicenter, phase II study (ALTER-H-003), patients with advanced HCC without previous systemic anticancer therapy were recruited. Eligible patients were given anlotinib (12 mg on days 1-14) combined with toripalimab (240 mg on day 1) in a 3-week cycle. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR) by immune-related Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (irRECIST)/RECIST v1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Between January 2020 and Jul 2021, 31 eligible patients were treated and included in the full analysis set. At data cutoff (January 10, 2023), the ORR was 29.0% (95% CI: 12.1%-46.0%) by irRECIST/RECIST v1.1, and 32.3% (95% CI: 14.8%-49.7%) by mRECIST criteria, respectively. Confirmed DCR and median DoR by irRECIST/RECIST v1.1 and mRECIST criteria were 77.4 % (95% CI: 61.8%-93.0%) and not reached (range: 3.0-22.5+ months), respectively. Median PFS was 11.0 months (95% CI: 3.4-18.5 months) and median OS was 18.2 months (95% CI: 15.8-20.5 months). Of the 31 patients assessed for adverse events (AEs), the most common grade ≥ 3 treatment-related AEs were hand-foot syndrome (9.7%, 3/31), hypertension (9.7%, 3/31), arthralgia (9.7%, 3/31), abnormal liver function (6.5%, 2/31), and decreased neutrophil counts (6.5%, 2/31).

CONCLUSIONS

Anlotinib combined with toripalimab showed promising efficacy and manageable safety in Chinese patients with unresectable HCC in the first-line setting. This combination therapy may offer a potential new therapeutic approach for patients with unresectable HCC.

Multi-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor reverses resistance to immunotherapy in hepatic sarcomatoid carcinoma

Hepatic sarcomatoid carcinoma (HSC) is characterized by its aggressive behavior and poor prognosis. As of now, no universally endorsed standard therapeutic approaches for HSC have been established. Herein, we describe the case of a 60-year-old individual diagnosed with HSC, subsequently presenting with multiple metastases postoperatively. Owing to the pronounced expression of programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), the individual was subjected to monotherapy utilizing sintilimab for a duration spanning 12 months. Following this regimen, a synergistic treatment approach comprising both anlotinib and sintilimab was instituted, culminating in an ensuing 11 months of efficacious therapeutic response. Throughout the course of treatment, the patient's quality of life remained satisfactory. This particular therapeutic strategy not merely reinforces the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors in the realm of HSC management, but more pivotally, suggests that tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) might counteract resistance to PD-1 antagonists, thus offering a potentially augmented treatment paradigm for HSC.

Efficacy and safety of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta‑analysis

At present, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is often applied to patients who are not suitable or are unwilling to undergo surgical treatment. However, to the best of our knowledge, the efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in HCC have not been fully demonstrated. Published studies involving the treatment of patients with HCC with HAIC, ICIs and TKIs were searched from public databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library and Sinomed. Efficacy and safety data for each study, including progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and adverse events (AEs) were collected. The present study included 17 treatment groups from 15 studies, including 1,987 patients with HCC in the systematic review. The target population was dominated by those unsuitable for surgical treatment, with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B or C, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2 and Child-Pugh score A or B. The results showed that the longest estimated median PFS (95% CI) in the HAIC + ICI/TKI therapy group (group C) was 9.37 months (95% CI, 6.81-11.93); in the HAIC therapy group (group B) was 7.45 months (95% CI, 6.45-8.46); and in the ICIs + other systemic therapies group (group A) was 5.92 months (95% CI, 5.31-6.54). There was no significant difference in the expected OS among the three groups, which may be because OS events were not reached in numerous studies during the follow-up time. The incidence of treatment-related adverse effects, such as increased AST [14/221 (6.33%)], increased ALT [13/221 (5.88%)], and decreased platelet count [13/221 (5.88%)], was not significantly increased in group C when compared with groups A or B (P>0.05). In conclusion, the effectiveness of HAIC + ICI/TKI for the treatment of advanced HCC was better than that of ICIs + other systemic therapies or HAIC alone. In addition, the incidence of AEs above grade 3 was not significantly higher compared with that in the other treatment groups, and the safety profile was good.

Overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sintilimab and disease outcome after treatment discontinuation

BACKGROUND

The use of Anti-PD-1 therapy has yielded promising outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, limited research has been conducted on the overall survival (OS) of patients with varying tumor responses and treatment duration.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed HCC patients who received sintilimab between January 2019 and December 2020 at four centers in China. The evaluation of tumor progression was based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The study investigated the correlation between tumor response and OS, and the impact of drug use on OS following progressive disease (PD).

RESULTS

Out of 441 treated patients, 159 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. Among them, 77 patients with disease control exhibited a significantly longer OS compared to the 82 patients with PD (median OS 26.0 vs. 11.3 months, P < 0.001). Additionally, the OS of patients with objective response (OR) was better than that of patients with stable disease (P = 0.002). Among the 47 patients with PD who continued taking sintilimab, the OS was better than the 35 patients who discontinued treatment (median OS 11.4 vs. 6.9 months, P = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, the tumor response in HCC patients who received sintilimab affects OS, and patients with PD may benefit from continued use of sintilimab.

Prognostic value of controlling nutritional status on clinical and survival outcomes in cancer patients treated with immunotherapy

Cancer is a leading cause of death globally. Immunotherapy has shown promise in treating various types of cancer, but its effectiveness varies among patients. The Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) score has been linked to the prognosis of different cancers. However, its predictive value for immunotherapy outcomes is not well understood. Our research represents the pioneering meta-study to examine the prognostic value of the CONUT score on cancer patients treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). A comprehensive literature search was conducted using various databases including PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Google Scholar. The study was conducted until July 28, 2023. This analysis encompassed a comprehensive evaluation of various clinical outcomes, namely overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR). 663 patients from 8 studies were included in this study. It showed that cancer patients with high CONUT score had poorer OS (HR: 1.94, 95% CI, 1.52-2.47, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 2.22, 95% CI, 1.48-3.31, p < 0.001), as well as worse ORR (OR: 0.46, 95% CI, 0.25-0.85, p = 0.013) and DCR (HR: 0.29, 95% CI, 0.14-0.59, p = 0.001). The CONUT score can predict the prognosis of tumor patients treated with ICIs.

Efficacy and safety of anlotinib as an adjuvant therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with a high risk of postoperative recurrence

Objective

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a high rate of postoperative recurrence and lacks an effective treatment to prevent recurrence. This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib in postoperative adjuvant therapy for HCC patients with high-risk recurrence factors.

Methods

For this multicenter, retrospective study, we recruited 63 HCC patients who received either anlotinib (n=27) or transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) (n=36) from six research centers in China between March 2019 and October 2020. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS) and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and safety.

Results

In this study, the median follow-up time was 25.9 and 26.8 months in the anlotinib and TACE groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the median DFS between the anlotinib [26.8 months, 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 6.8-NE] and TACE groups (20.6 months, 95% CI: 8.4-NE). The 12-month OS rates in the anlotinib and TACE groups were 96.3% and 97.2%, respectively. In the anlotinib group, 19 of 27 patients (70.4%) experienced treatment-emergent adverse events, with the most common events (≥10%) being hypertension (22.2%) and decreased platelet count (22.2%).

Conclusions

The results indicate that anlotinib, as a new, orally administered tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has the same efficacy as TACE, and side effects can be well controlled.

Research progress of targeted therapy combined with immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a common gastrointestinal malignancy with a high mortality rate and limited treatment options. Molecularly targeted drugs combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors have shown unique advantages over single-agent applications, significantly prolonging patient survival. This paper reviews the research progress of molecular-targeted drugs combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma and discusses the effectiveness and safety of the combination of the two drugs to provide a reference for the further application of molecular-targeted drugs combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical practice.

Emerging biomaterials for tumor immunotherapy

BACKGROUND

The immune system interacts with cancer cells in various intricate ways that can protect the individual from overproliferation of cancer cells; however, these interactions can also lead to malignancy. There has been a dramatic increase in the application of cancer immunotherapy in the last decade. However, low immunogenicity, poor specificity, weak presentation efficiency, and off-target side effects still limit its widespread application. Fortunately, advanced biomaterials effectively contribute immunotherapy and play an important role in cancer treatment, making it a research hotspot in the biomedical field.

MAIN BODY

This review discusses immunotherapies and the development of related biomaterials for application in the field. The review first summarizes the various types of tumor immunotherapy applicable in clinical practice as well as their underlying mechanisms. Further, it focuses on the types of biomaterials applied in immunotherapy and related research on metal nanomaterials, silicon nanoparticles, carbon nanotubes, polymer nanoparticles, and cell membrane nanocarriers. Moreover, we introduce the preparation and processing technologies of these biomaterials (liposomes, microspheres, microneedles, and hydrogels) and summarize their mechanisms when applied to tumor immunotherapy. Finally, we discuss future advancements and shortcomings related to the application of biomaterials in tumor immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Research on biomaterial-based tumor immunotherapy is booming; however, several challenges remain to be overcome to transition from experimental research to clinical application. Biomaterials have been optimized continuously and nanotechnology has achieved continuous progression, ensuring the development of more efficient biomaterials, thereby providing a platform and opportunity for breakthroughs in tumor immunotherapy.

Systemic therapy with or without transcatheter intra-arterial therapies for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a real-world, multi-center study

Background

Systemic therapy is the standard care of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), while transcatheter intra-arterial therapies (TRITs) were also widely applied to uHCC patients in Chinese practice. However, the benefit of additional TRIT in these patients is unclear. This study investigated the survival benefit of concurrent TRIT and systemic therapy used as first-line treatment for patients with uHCC.

Methods

This real-world, multi-center retrospective study included consecutive patients treated at 11 centers accross China between September 2018 and April 2022. Eligible patients had uHCC of China liver cancer stages IIb to IIIb (Barcelona clinic liver cancer B or C stage), and received first-line systemic therapy with or without concurrent TRIT. Of 289 patients included, 146 received combination therapy and 143 received systemic therapy alone. The overall survival (OS), as primary outcomes, was compared between patients who received systemic therapy plus TRIT (combination group) or systemic therapy alone (systemic-only group) using survival analysis and Cox regression. Imbalances in baseline clinical features between the two groups were adjusted through propensity score matching (PSM) and inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Moreover, subgroup analysis was conducted based on the different tumor characteristics of enrolled uHCC patients.

Results

The median OS was significantly longer in the combination group than the systemic-only group before adjustment [not reached vs. 23.9 months; hazard ratio (HR), 0.561; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.366 to 0.861; P = 0.008], after PSM (HR, 0.612; 95% CI, 0.390 to 0.958; P = 0.031) and after IPTW (HR, 0.539; 95% CI, 0.116 to 0.961; P = 0.008). Subgroup analyses suggested the benefit of combining TRIT with systemic therapy was greatest in patients with liver tumors exceeding the up-to-seven criteria, with an absence of extrahepatic metastasis, or with alfa-fetoprotein ≥ 400 ng/ml.

Conclusion

Concurrent TRIT with systemic therapy was associated with improved survival compared with systemic therapy alone as first-line treatment for uHCC, especially for patients with high-intrahepatic tumor load and no extrahepatic metastasis.

Novel strategies for cancer immunotherapy: counter-immunoediting therapy

The advent of immunotherapy has made an indelible mark on the field of cancer therapy, especially the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors in clinical practice. Although immunotherapy has proven its efficacy and safety in some tumors, many patients still have innate or acquired resistance to immunotherapy. The emergence of this phenomenon is closely related to the highly heterogeneous immune microenvironment formed by tumor cells after undergoing cancer immunoediting. The process of cancer immunoediting refers to the cooperative interaction between tumor cells and the immune system that involves three phases: elimination, equilibrium, and escape. During these phases, conflicting interactions between the immune system and tumor cells result in the formation of a complex immune microenvironment, which contributes to the acquisition of different levels of immunotherapy resistance in tumor cells. In this review, we summarize the characteristics of different phases of cancer immunoediting and the corresponding therapeutic tools, and we propose normalized therapeutic strategies based on immunophenotyping. The process of cancer immunoediting is retrograded through targeted interventions in different phases of cancer immunoediting, making immunotherapy in the context of precision therapy the most promising therapy to cure cancer.

TKIs in combination with immunotherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The treatment landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has significantly changed over the last 5 years with multiple options in the frontline, second line, and beyond. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) were the first approved systemic treatments for the advanced stage of HCC; however, thanks to the increasing knowledge and characterization of the immunological features of the tumor microenvironment, the systemic treatment of HCC has been further expanded with the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) approach and the following evidence of the higher efficacy obtained with combined treatment with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab over sorafenib.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we look at rationale, efficacy, and safety profiles of current and emerging ICI/TKI combination treatments and discuss the available results from other clinical trials using similar combinatorial therapeutic approaches.

EXPERT OPINION

Angiogenesis and immune evasion are the two key pathogenic hallmarks of HCC. While the pioneering regimen of atezolizumab/bevacizumab is consolidating as the first-line treatment of advanced HCC, it will be essential, in the near future, to determine the best second-line treatment options and how to optimize the selection of the most effective therapies. These points still need to be addressed by future studies that are largely warranted to enhance the treatment's effectiveness and ultimately to tackle down HCC lethality.

Adjuvant ICIs Plus Targeted Therapies Reduce HCC Recurrence after Hepatectomy in Patients with High Risk of Recurrence

BACKGROUND

The high recurrence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after hepatectomy usually results in poor prognosis. To the best of our knowledge, no study has reported the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus targeted therapies on preventing HCC recurrence after hepatectomy. Thus, the aim of this study was to investigate the benefits and safety of applying adjuvant ICIs plus targeted therapies after hepatectomy for patients at high risk of HCC recurrence.

METHODS

A total of 196 patients with any risk factors for recurrence who underwent hepatectomy for HCC were reviewed in this retrospective study.

RESULTS

Compared with the control group (n = 158), ICIs plus targeted therapies (n = 38) had a significantly higher recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate in univariate analysis (HR, 0.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.24-0.90; p = 0.020), multivariate analysis (adjusted HR, 0.62; 95%CI, 0.49-0.79; p < 0.001) and propensity score-matched analysis (HR, 0.35; 95%CI, 0.16-0.75; p = 0.005). Subgroup analyses also showed that postoperative adjuvant ICIs plus targeted therapies might reduce HCC recurrence in patients with the most of risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative adjuvant ICI plus targeted therapies may reduces early HCC recurrence in patients with a high risk of recurrence, and the treatments are well tolerated.

Case report: Complete response of an anaplastic thyroid carcinoma patient with NRAS Q61R/BRAF D594N mutations to the triplet of dabrafenib, trametinib and PD-1 antibody

Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma, BRAF non-V600, NRAS, combination immunotherapy and targeted therapy, case report. Anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC) is a rare type of thyroid cancer with a mortality rate near 100%. BRAF V600 and NRAS mutations are the most common drivers of ATC. While patients with BRAF V600-mutated ATC can be treated with BRAF-targeted therapy, there is no effective treatment for ATC driven by NRAS or non-V600 BRAF mutations. For patients with untargetable driver mutations, immunotherapy provides an alternative treatment option. Here, we present a metastatic ATC patient with PD-L1 positive (tumor proportion score of 60%) tumor and NRAS Q61R/BRAF D594N mutations, who progressed on PD-1 antibody sintilimab plus angiogenesis inhibitor anlotinib. The class 3 BRAF mutant D594N is sensitive to the inhibition of MEK inhibitor trametinib, and its oncogenic activity also depends on CRAF, which can be inhibited by BRAF inhibitor dabrafenib. For these reasons, the patient received a salvage treatment regime of dabrafenib, trametinib, and sintilimab, which resulted in a complete pathological response. To our best knowledge, this is the first report of successful treatment of ATC patients with concurrent NRAS/BRAF non-V600 mutations with the combination of immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Further investigation is required to decipher the mechanism by which the combination of dabrafenib/trametinib with PD-1 antibody overcomes initial immunotherapy resistance likely mediated by concurrent BRAF and NRAS mutations.

The efficacies and biomarker investigations of antiangiogenic agents and PD-1 inhibitors for metastatic soft tissue sarcoma: A multicenter retrospective study

Objective

To investigate the efficacy and safety of antiangiogenesis-immunotherapy in patients with advanced STS in China, and to explore the potential factors of prognosis.

Patients and Methods

This retrospective study was conducted at three hospitals in China, and the patients with metastatic STS who were ineligible for or declined anthracycline-based chemotherapy received antiangiogenic agents (anlotinib or apatinib) plus programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (camrelizumab or sintilimab) between June 2019 and May 2022. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 6 months (6-month PFSR), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Biomarkers that might affect the prognosis were explored.

Results

Thirty-nine patients were included: five patients with alveolar soft tissue sarcoma (ASPS) and 34 with non-ASPS. With a median follow-up of 18.2 months, the 6-month PFSR was 51.3%, with the ORR of 20.5% and DCR of 76.9%. The median PFS and OS were 7.0 months and 17.2 months. The 6-month PFSR for patients with ASPS and non-ASPS was 80.0% and 47.1%, respectively. The most common adverse events were hypothyroidism (56.4%), followed by fatigue (46.2%), and hypertriglyceridemia (43.6%). No treatment-related deaths were observed. Patients with low baseline NLR (NLR < 4) had better 6-month PFSR than those with high NLR (NLR ≥ 4) (82.4% vs. 31.6%).

Conclusion

Antiangiogenic agents plus PD-1 inhibitors showed acceptable toxicity and promising efficacy in patients with advanced STS, especially patients with ASPS, and a low NLR might serve as a reliable biomarker for 6-month PFSR, PFS, and OS. It provides a reference for randomized controlled trials.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Therapeutic Algorithm for Localized and Advanced Disease

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer in patients with liver cirrhosis of various etiologies. In recent years, there has been an advance in the knowledge of molecular mechanisms and a better staging definition of patients which has allowed the development of new therapies that have entered the therapeutic workup of these patients. Deep information on molecular drivers of HCC contributed to the development of targeted therapies with remarkable benefits. The novel strategies of targeting immune evasion using immune checkpoint inhibitors and CAR-T and TCR-T therapeutics have also shown promising results. For advanced diseases, the therapeutic algorithm has been recently updated, thanks to the efficacy of combining immunotherapy and antiangiogenic therapy in the first-line setting, and new drugs, both as single-agents or combinations, are currently under investigation.

Efficacy and safety of monotherapy and combination therapy of immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review, meta-analysis and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the cancers with the highest morbidity and mortality. Sorafenib used to be the main treatment for unresectable HCC patients. However, regimens based on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have attracted attention in recent years because of their reported benefits. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of monotherapy and combination therapy of ICIs as first-line treatment for unresectable HCC patients by conducting a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis.

METHODS

Studies published up to 11st August 2022 were searched from 4 commonly used databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Clinical trials.gov. All eligible clinical trials were included. Data about reported objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were extracted.

RESULTS

Of the 8579 studies retrieved, 24 met the inclusion criteria. In patients with unresectable HCC taking ICIs-based therapy as first-line treatment, the pooled result of median PFS and median OS was 5.76 months (95% CI 4.82-6.69) and 16.35 months (95% CI 15.19-17.51) The ORR and DCR were 25.1% (95% CI 20.8-29.5%) and 75.2% (95% CI 70.3-80.2%) measured by RECIST v1.1 or 40.2% (95% CI 31.7-48.6%) with 75.2% (95% CI 68.3-82.1%) measured by mRECIST v1.1. Compared to sorafenib, ICIs-based therapy significantly prolonged OS. The combination treatment of sintilimab plus IBI305 had the highest ORR, while atezolizumab plus bevacizumab had the highest DCR. The pooled incidence of any grade TRAEs was 82.3% (95% CI 73.9-90.7%), with highest incidence appeared in dysphonia.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that first-line ICIs-based therapies could provide survival benefits for patients with unresectable HCC, with manageable TRAEs. The potential of combination treatment to become the new treatment trend in clinical practice is promising.

Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A tertiary medical center experience

Background

Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) still accounts for the majority of newly diagnosed HCC which with poor prognosis. In the era of systemic therapy, combination therapy with programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) inhibitors and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has become mainstream. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) as a local treatment has also shown a strong anti-tumor effect. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of HAIC, PD-1 inhibitors plus TKIs for u-HCC.

Methods

This retrospective study included patients with initially u-HCC between October 2020 to April 2022 who had received at least one cycle of therapy with HAIC, PD-1 inhibitors plus TKIs. The primary outcome included overall response rate (ORR), the disease control rate (DCR), surgical conversion rate, progression-free survival (PFS) and treatment-related adverse events.

Results

A total of 145 patients were included in the study. The median treatment cycle of HAIC and PD-1 inhibitors were 3 and 4, respectively. According to the modified RECIST criteria, the best ORR was 57.2% (83/145), 9 had achieved complete response (CR), DCR was 89.7% (130/145). Median time to achieve CR or PR was 65 days. Surgical conversion rate was 18.6% (27/145), seven patients (7/27,25.9%) achieved pathological complete response (pCR). The median follow-up was 12.5 months (4.5-20 months), and the median PFS was 9.7 months. Subgroup analysis showed that Child-pugh A patients had higher DCR (92.2% vs 79.3%, p=0.041) than Child-pugh B patients, as well as increased successful conversion rate (22.4% vs 3.4%, p=0.019). Patients without vascular invasion and extrahepatic metastases showed higher PR (63.4% vs 43.3%, p&lt;0.05) and ORR (73.2% vs 50.0%, p&lt;0.05) than those with vascular invasion. The ORR (73.2% vs 45.5%, p&lt;0.05) and DCR (95.1% vs 78.8%, p&lt;0.05) were also significantly better than those of patients with extrahepatic metastases. HAIC regimen was not related to efficacy (All p&gt;0.05). The incidence rate of grade 3/4 treatment-related AEs was 17.7% without fatal events.

Conclusion

The triple combination therapy of HAIC and PD-1 inhibitors plus TKIs for patients with initially unresectable HCC exhibited satisfactory efficacy with tolerable toxicity.