Safety tumor treating fields (TTFields) therapy in pediatric patients with malignant brain tumors: Post-marketing surveillance data

Global post‑marketing safety surveillance of Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) therapy in over 25,000 patients with CNS malignancies treated between 2011-2022

BACKGROUND

Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are alternating electric fields that disrupt cancer cell processes. TTFields therapy is approved for recurrent glioblastoma (rGBM), and newly-diagnosed (nd) GBM (with concomitant temozolomide for ndGBM; US), and for grade IV glioma (EU). We present an updated global, post-marketing surveillance safety analysis of patients with CNS malignancies treated with TTFields therapy.

METHODS

Safety data were collected from routine post-marketing activities for patients in North America, Europe, Israel, and Japan (October 2011-October 2022). Adverse events (AEs) were stratified by age, sex, and diagnosis.

RESULTS

Overall, 25,898 patients were included (diagnoses: ndGBM [68%], rGBM [26%], anaplastic astrocytoma/oligodendroglioma [4%], other CNS malignancies [2%]). Median (range) age was 59 (3-103) years; 66% patients were male. Most (69%) patients were 18-65 years; 0.4% were < 18 years; 30% were > 65 years. All-cause and TTFields-related AEs occurred in 18,798 (73%) and 14,599 (56%) patients, respectively. Most common treatment-related AEs were beneath-array skin reactions (43%), electric sensation (tingling; 14%), and heat sensation (warmth; 12%). Treatment-related skin reactions were comparable in pediatric (39%), adult (42%), and elderly (45%) groups, and in males (41%) and females (46%); and similar across diagnostic subgroups (ndGBM, 46%; rGBM, 34%; anaplastic astrocytoma/oligodendroglioma, 42%; other, 40%). No TTFields-related systemic AEs were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

This long-term, real-world analysis of > 25,000 patients demonstrated good tolerability of TTFields in patients with CNS malignancies. Most therapy-related AEs were manageable localized, non-serious skin events. The TTFields therapy safety profile remained consistent across subgroups (age, sex, and diagnosis), indicative of its broad applicability.

Tumor treating fields for newly diagnosed high-grade glioma based on the criteria of 2021 WHO CNS5: A retrospective analysis of Chinese patients in a single center

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

High-grade glioma (HGG) is known to be characterized by a high degree of malignancy and a worse prognosis. The classical treatment is safe resection supplemented by radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Tumor treating fields (TTFields), an emerging physiotherapeutic modality that targets malignant solid tumors using medium-frequency, low-intensity, alternating electric fields to interfere with cell division, have been used for the treatment of new diagnosis of glioblastoma, however, their administration in HGG requires further clinical evidence. The efficacy and safety of TTFields in Chinese patients with HGG were retrospectively evaluated by us in a single center.

METHODS

We enrolled and analyzed 52 patients with newly diagnosed HGG undergoing surgery and standard chemoradiotherapy regimens from December 2019 to June 2022, and followed them until June 2023. Based on whether they used TTFields, they were divided into a TTFields group and a non-TTFields group. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were 26 cases in the TTFields group and 26 cases in the non-TTFields group. In the TTFields group, the median PFS was 14.2 months (95% CI: 9.50-18.90), the median OS was 19.7 months (95% CI: 14.95-24.25) , the median interval from surgery to the start of treatment with TTFields was 2.47 months (95% CI: 1.47-4.13), and the median duration of treatment with TTFields was 10.6 months (95% CI: 9.57-11.63). 15 (57.69%) patients experienced an adverse event and no serious adverse event was reported. In the non-TTFields group, the median PFS was 9.57 months (95% CI: 6.23-12.91) and the median OS was 16.07 months (95% CI: 12.90-19.24). There was a statistically significant difference in PFS (p = 0.005) and OS (p = 0.007) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis, TTFields were observed to improve newly diagnosed HGG patients' median PFS and OS. Compliance was much higher than reported in clinical trials and safety remained good.

Identification and validation of COL6A1 as a novel target for tumor electric field therapy in glioblastoma

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain malignancy. Novel therapeutic modalities like tumor electric field therapy (TEFT) have shown promise, but underlying mechanisms remain unclear. The extracellular matrix (ECM) is implicated in GBM progression, warranting investigation into TEFT-ECM interplay.

METHODS

T98G cells were treated with TEFT (200 kHz, 2.2 V/m) for 72 h. Collagen type VI alpha 1 (COL6A1) was identified as hub gene via comprehensive bioinformatic analysis based on RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) and public glioma datasets. TEFT intervention models were established using T98G and Ln229 cell lines. Pre-TEFT and post-TEFT GBM tissues were collected for further validation. Focal adhesion pathway activity was assessed by western blot. Functional partners of COL6A1 were identified and validated by co-localization and survival analysis.

RESULTS

TEFT altered ECM-related gene expression in T98G cells, including the hub gene COL6A1. COL6A1 was upregulated in GBM and associated with poor prognosis. Muti-database GBM single-cell analysis revealed high-COL6A1 expression predominantly in malignant cell subpopulations. Differential expression and functional enrichment analyses suggested COL6A1 might be involved in ECM organization and focal adhesion. Western blot (WB), immunofluorescence (IF), and co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) experiments revealed that TEFT significantly inhibited expression of COL6A1, hindering its interaction with ITGA5, consequently suppressing the FAK/Paxillin/AKT pathway activity. These results suggested that TEFT might exert its antitumor effects by downregulating COL6A1 and thereby inhibiting the activity of the focal adhesion pathway.

CONCLUSION

TEFT could remodel the ECM of GBM cells by downregulating COL6A1 expression and inhibiting focal adhesion pathway. COL6A1 could interact with ITGA5 and activate the focal adhesion pathway, suggesting that it might be a potential therapeutic target mediating the antitumor effects of TEFT.

Efficacy of tumour-treating fields therapy in recurrent glioblastoma: A narrative review of current evidence

Recurrent Glioblastoma presents a formidable challenge in oncology due to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options. Tumour-Treating Fields (TTFields) Therapy, a novel therapeutic modality, has emerged as a promising approach to address this clinical conundrum. This review synthesizes the current evidence surrounding the efficacy of TTFields Therapy in the context of recurrent Glioblastoma. Diverse academic databases were explored to identify relevant studies published within the last decade. Strategic keyword selection facilitated the inclusion of studies focusing on TTFields Therapy's efficacy, treatment outcomes, and patient-specific factors. The review reveals a growing body of evidence suggesting the potential clinical benefits of TTFields Therapy for patients with recurrent Glioblastoma. Studies consistently demonstrate its positive impact on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The therapy's safety profile remains favorable, with mild to moderate skin reactions being the most commonly reported adverse events. Our analysis highlights the importance of patient selection criteria, with emerging biomarkers such as PTEN mutation status influencing therapy response. Additionally, investigations into combining TTFields Therapy with other treatments, including surgical interventions and novel approaches, offer promising avenues for enhancing therapeutic outcomes. The synthesis of diverse studies underscores the potential of TTFields Therapy as a valuable addition to the armamentarium against recurrent Glioblastoma. The narrative review comprehensively explains the therapy's mechanisms, clinical benefits, adverse events, and future directions. The insights gathered herein serve as a foundation for clinicians and researchers striving to optimize treatment strategies for patients facing the challenging landscape of recurrent Glioblastoma.