Application progress of liquid biopsy in gastric cancer

Cell-free Nucleic Acid as Promising Diagnostic Biomarkers for Gastric Cancer: a Systematic Review

Background: Gastric cancer (GC) is a common malignancy with early detection being crucial for survival. Liquid biopsy analysis using cell-free nucleic acid is a preferred method for detection. Hence, we conducted a systematic review to assess the diagnostic efficacy of cell-free nucleic acid markers for GC. Methods: We searched PubMed and ISI Web of Science databases for articles that conformed to our inclusion and exclusion criteria from 2012 to 2022. The following information was abstracted: first author, year of publication, country/region, age, male proportion, tumor stage for cases, specimen type, measurement method, targeted markers and diagnostic related indicators (including sensitivity, specificity, AUC, P-value). Results: Fifty-eight studies examined cell-free RNAs (cfRNAs) with a total of 62 individual circulating markers and 7 panels in serum or plasma, while 21 studies evaluated cell-free DNAs (cfDNAs) with 29 individual circulating markers and 7 panels. For individual cfRNAs, the median (range) sensitivity and specificity were 80% (21% - 98%) and 80% (54% - 99%), respectively. The median (range) sensitivity and specificity for cfRNA panels were 86% (83% - 90%) and 75% (60% - 98%), respectively. In comparison, the median (range) sensitivity and specificity reported for individual cfDNAs were 50% (18% - 96%) and 93% (57% - 100%), respectively, while cfDNA panels had a median (range) sensitivity and specificity of 85% (41% - 92%) and 73.5% (38% - 90%), respectively. The meta results indicate that cfRNA markers exhibit high sensitivity (80%) and low specificity (80%) for detecting GC, while cfDNA markers have lower sensitivity (59%) but higher specificity (92%). Conclusions: This review has demonstrated that cell-free nucleic acids have the potential to serve as useful diagnostic markers for GC. Given that both cfRNA and cfDNA markers have shown promising diagnostic performance for GC, the combination of the two may potentially enhance diagnostic efficiency.

Liquid Biopsy: An Emerging Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Predictive Tool in Gastric Cancer

Liquid biopsy, a minimally invasive procedure that causes minimal pain and complication risks to patients, has been extensively studied for cancer diagnosis and treatment. Moreover, it facilitates comprehensive quantification and serial assessment of the whole-body tumor burden. Several biosources obtained through liquid biopsy have been studied as important biomarkers for establishing early diagnosis, monitoring minimal residual disease, and predicting the prognosis and response to treatment in patients with cancer. Although the clinical application of liquid biopsy in gastric cancer is not as robust as that in other cancers, biomarker studies using liquid biopsy are being actively conducted in patients with gastric cancer. Herein, we aimed to review the role of various biosources that can be obtained from patients with gastric cancer through liquid biopsies, such as blood, saliva, gastric juice, urine, stool, peritoneal lavage fluid, and ascites, by dividing them into cellular and acellular components. In addition, we reviewed previous studies on the diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive biomarkers for gastric cancer using liquid biopsy and discussed the limitations of liquid biopsy and the challenges to overcome these limitations in patients with gastric cancer.

Integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA-seq establishes a novel signature for prediction in gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Single-cell sequencing technology provides the capability to analyze changes in specific cell types during the progression of disease. However, previous single-cell sequencing studies on gastric cancer (GC) have largely focused on immune cells and stromal cells, and further elucidation is required regarding the alterations that occur in gastric epithelial cells during the development of GC.

AIM

To create a GC prediction model based on single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing (bulk RNA-seq) data.

METHODS

In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis by integrating three single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) datasets and ten bulk RNA-seq datasets. Our analysis mainly focused on determining cell proportions and identifying differentially expressed genes (DEGs). Specifically, we performed differential expression analysis among epithelial cells in GC tissues and normal gastric tissues (NAGs) and utilized both single-cell and bulk RNA-seq data to establish a prediction model for GC. We further validated the accuracy of the GC prediction model in bulk RNA-seq data. We also used Kaplan–Meier plots to verify the correlation between genes in the prediction model and the prognosis of GC.

RESULTS

By analyzing scRNA-seq data from a total of 70707 cells from GC tissue, NAG, and chronic gastric tissue, 10 cell types were identified, and DEGs in GC and normal epithelial cells were screened. After determining the DEGs in GC and normal gastric samples identified by bulk RNA-seq data, a GC predictive classifier was constructed using the Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and random forest methods. The LASSO classifier showed good performance in both validation and model verification using The Cancer Genome Atlas and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) datasets [area under the curve (AUC)_min = 0.988, AUC_1se = 0.994], and the random forest model also achieved good results with the validation set (AUC = 0.92). Genes TIMP1, PLOD3, CKS2, TYMP, TNFRSF10B, CPNE1, GDF15, BCAP31, and CLDN7 were identified to have high importance values in multiple GC predictive models, and KM-PLOTTER analysis showed their relevance to GC prognosis, suggesting their potential for use in GC diagnosis and treatment.

CONCLUSION

A predictive classifier was established based on the analysis of RNA-seq data, and the genes in it are expected to serve as auxiliary markers in the clinical diagnosis of GC.

Association between circulating tumor cells in the peripheral blood and the prognosis of gastric cancer patients: a meta-analysis

Background

Research on the correlation between circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and gastric cancer (GC) has increased rapidly in recent years. However, whether CTCs are associated with GC patient prognosis is highly controversial.

Objective

This study aims to evaluate the value of CTCs to predict the prognosis of GC patients.

Design

A meta-analysis.

Data Sources and Methods

We searched the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for studies that reported the prognostic value of CTCs in GC patients before October 2022. The association between CTCs and overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS)/recurrence-free survival (RFS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of GC patients was assessed. Subgroup analyses were stratified by sampling times (pre-treatment and post-treatment), detection targets, detection method, treatment method, tumor stage, region, and HR (Hazard Ratio) extraction methods. Sensitivity analysis was performed by removing individual studies to assess the stability of the results. Publication bias was evaluated using funnel plots, Egger's test, and Begg's test.

Results

We initially screened 2000 studies, of which 28 were available for further analysis, involving 2383 GC patients. The pooled analysis concluded that the detection of CTCs was associated with poor OS (HR = 1.933, 95% CI 1.657-2.256, p < 0.001), DFS/RFS (HR = 3.228, 95% CI 2.475-4.211, p < 0.001), and PFS (HR = 3.272, 95% CI 1.970-5.435, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the subgroup analysis stratified by tumor stage (p < 0.01), HR extraction methods (p < 0.001), detection targets (p < 0.001), detection method (p < 0.001), sampling times (p < 0.001), and treatment method (p < 0.001) all showed that CTC detection was associated with poor OS and DFS/RFS for GC patients. Furthermore, the study showed that CTCs were associated with the poor DFS/RFS of GC when CTCs were detected for patients from Asian or No-Asian regions (p < 0.05). In addition, higher CTCs predicted poorer OS for GC patients who are from Asian regions (p < 0.001), but without statistical difference for GC patients from No-Asian regions (p = 0.490).

Conclusion

CTC detection in peripheral blood was associated with poor OS, DFS/RFS, and PFS in patients with GC.

Circulating Tumor DNA in Gastric Adenocarcinoma: Future Clinical Applications and Perspectives

Gastric cancer (GC) is still one of the most aggressive cancers with a few targetable alterations and a dismal prognosis. A liquid biopsy allows for identifying and analyzing the DNA released from tumor cells into the bloodstream. Compared to tissue-based biopsy, liquid biopsy is less invasive, requires fewer samples, and can be repeated over time in order to longitudinally monitor tumor burden and molecular changes. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has been recognized to have a prognostic role in all the disease stages of GC. The aim of this article is to review the current and future applications of ctDNA in gastric adenocarcinoma, in particular, with respect to early diagnosis, the detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) following curative surgery, and in the advanced disease setting for treatment decision choice and therapeutic monitoring. Although liquid biopsies have shown potentiality, pre-analytical and analytical steps must be standardized and validated to ensure the reproducibility and standardization of the procedures and data analysis methods. Further research is needed to allow the use of liquid biopsy in everyday clinical practice.

Robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: systematic review and future directions

BACKGROUND

Robotic gastrectomy (RG) using the da Vinci Surgical System for gastric cancer was approved for national medical insurance coverage in Japan in April 2018, and its number has been rapidly increasing since then.

AIM

We reviewed and compared current evidence on RG and conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) to identify the differences in surgical outcomes.

METHODS

Three independent reviewers systematically reviewed the data collected from a comprehensive literature search by an independent organization, focusing on the following nine endpoints: mortality, morbidity, operative time, estimated blood loss volume, length of postoperative hospital stay, long-term oncologic outcome, quality of life, learning curve, and cost.

RESULTS

Compared to LG, RG has lower intraoperative blood loss volume, shorter length of hospital stay, and shorter learning curve, but both procedures have similar mortality. Contrarily, its disadvantages include longer procedural time and higher costs. Although the morbidity rate and long-term outcomes are almost comparable, RG showed superior potentials. Currently, the outcomes of RG are considered comparable to or better than LG.

CONCLUSION

RG might be applicable to all gastric cancer patients who fulfill the indication of LG at institutions that meet specific criteria and are approved to claim the National Health Insurance costs for the use of the surgical robot in Japan.