1
|
Saito M, Saito T. A simple algorithm to derive virtual non-contrast electron density from dual-energy computed tomography data for radiotherapy treatment planning. Med Phys 2025. [PMID: 39865311 DOI: 10.1002/mp.17648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2024] [Revised: 12/28/2024] [Accepted: 01/09/2025] [Indexed: 01/28/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of iodinated contrast-enhancing agents in computed tomography (CT) improves the visualization of relevant structures for radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP). However, it can lead to dose calculation errors by incorrectly converting a CT number to electron density. PURPOSE This study aimed to propose an algorithm for deriving virtual non-contrast (VNC) electron density from dual-energy CT (DECT) data. This algorithm was developed by extending the formula previously developed by Saito, which enables the calculation of the electron density of human tissue through weighted subtraction of CT numbers acquired from DECT scans. METHODS To investigate the feasibility of the proposed VNC algorithm, we performed analytical DECT image simulations at 90 and 150 kV/Sn on virtual phantoms consisting of various tissue/iodine surrogates with known mass densities and elemental compositions. Two different shapes of phantoms made of water-mimicking surrogates were generated as inputs: a circular phantom (33 cm diameter) for calibration and an elliptical phantom (33 cm width and 28 cm height) for validation. The circular phantom was equipped with inserts of human-tissue-mimicking substitutes, pure water, and iodine-enhanced soft-tissue substitutes (2, 5, 10, and 15 mg/mL iodine). The elliptical phantom contained inserts of reference human tissues, iodine-enhanced soft-tissue substitutes (2, 2.5, 5, 7.5, 10, 15, and 20 mg/mL iodine), and a 10-mm-diameter core of 4 mg/mL iodine surrounded by a blood-mimicking base material. The performance of the proposed algorithm was evaluated by comparing the accuracy of VNC electron densities with those of non-contrast (NC) base materials (water- or blood-mimicking surrogates). RESULTS The derived algorithm enabled the calculation of VNC electron density in a manner similar to that of unenhanced human tissues by adapting a VNC-specific weighting factor, thereby eliminating the intermediate step of converting CT numbers to electron density. The simulated results showed that the VNC algorithm could almost completely remove the contrast in the electron density image between iodine-enhanced and base materials. The relative deviations of simulated VNC electron density values from the corresponding pre-contrast value were within ± 0.4% for all tested materials, with a root-mean-square error (RMSE) of 0.2%. CONCLUSIONS Within the limits of the analytical DECT image simulation used in this study, the simple VNC algorithm could effectively provide accurate VNC electron densities for iodine-enhanced materials. This may allow the contrast agent to be used for CT scans during RTP without compromising dose calculation accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masatoshi Saito
- Department of Radiological Technology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Niigata University, Niigata, Japan
| | - Tatsuki Saito
- Department of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Hokkaido, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shah KD, Zhou J, Roper J, Dhabaan A, Al-Hallaq H, Pourmorteza A, Yang X. Photon-Counting CT in Cancer Radiotherapy: Technological Advances and Clinical Benefits. ARXIV 2024:arXiv:2410.20236v3. [PMID: 39575116 PMCID: PMC11581100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2024]
Abstract
Photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) marks a significant advancement over conventional energy-integrating detector (EID) CT systems. This review highlights PCCT's superior spatial and contrast resolution, reduced radiation dose, and multi-energy imaging capabilities, which address key challenges in radiotherapy, such as accurate tumor delineation, precise dose calculation, and treatment response monitoring. PCCT's improved anatomical clarity enhances tumor targeting while minimizing damage to surrounding healthy tissues. Additionally, metal artifact reduction (MAR) and quantitative imaging capabilities optimize workflows, enabling adaptive radiotherapy and radiomics-driven personalized treatment. Emerging clinical applications in brachytherapy and radiopharmaceutical therapy (RPT) show promising outcomes, although challenges like high costs and limited software integration remain. With advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and dedicated radiotherapy packages, PCCT is poised to transform precision, safety, and efficacy in cancer radiotherapy, marking it as a pivotal technology for future clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keyur D. Shah
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Jun Zhou
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Justin Roper
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Anees Dhabaan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Hania Al-Hallaq
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | - Amir Pourmorteza
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences and Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zimmerman J, Poludniowski G. Assessment of Photon-Counting Computed Tomography for Quantitative Imaging in Radiation Therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)03640-X. [PMID: 39549761 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.11.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2024] [Revised: 10/15/2024] [Accepted: 11/03/2024] [Indexed: 11/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To test a first-generation clinical photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT) scanner's capabilities to characterize materials in an anthropomorphic head phantom for radiation therapy purposes. METHODS AND MATERIALS A CIRS 731-HN head-and-neck phantom (CIRS/SunNuclear) was scanned on a NAEOTOM Alpha PCCT and a SOMATOM Definition AS+ with single-energy and dual-energy CT techniques (SECT and DECT, respectively), both scanners manufactured by Siemens (Siemens Healthineers). A method was developed to derive relative electron density (RED) and effective atomic number (EAN) from linear attenuation coefficients (LACs) of virtual mono-energetic images and applied for the PCCT and DECT data. For DECT, Siemens' syngo.via "Rho/Z"-algorithm was also used. Proton stopping-power ratios (SPRs) were calculated based on RED/EAN with the Bethe equation. For SECT, a stoichiometric calibration to SPR was used. Nine materials in the phantom were segmented, excluding border pixels. Distributions and root-mean-square deviations within the material regions were evaluated for LAC, RED/EAN, and SPR, respectively. Two example ray projections were also examined for LAC, SPR, and water-equivalent thickness, for illustrations of a more treatment-like scenario. RESULTS There was a tendency toward narrower distributions for PCCT compared with both DECT methods for the investigated quantities, observed across all materials for RED only. Likewise the scored root-mean-square deviations showed overall superiority for PCCT with a few exceptions: for water-like materials, EAN and SPR were comparable between the modalities; for titanium, the RED and SPR estimates were inferior for PCCT. The PCCT data gave the smallest deviations from theoretic along the more complex example ray profile, whereas the more standard projection showed similar results between the modalities. CONCLUSIONS This study shows promising results for tissue characterization in a human-like geometry for radiation therapy purposes using PCCT. The significance of improvements for clinical practice remains to be demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Zimmerman
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Medical Physics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Gavin Poludniowski
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Medical Physics, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fogazzi E, Hu G, Bruzzi M, Farace P, Kröncke T, Niepel K, Ricke J, Risch F, Sabel B, Scaringella M, Schwarz F, Tommasino F, Landry G, Civinini C, Parodi K. A direct comparison of multi-energy x-ray and proton CT for imaging and relative stopping power estimation of plastic and ex-vivophantoms. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:175021. [PMID: 39159669 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad70ef] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 08/19/2024] [Indexed: 08/21/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Proton therapy administers a highly conformal dose to the tumour region, necessitating accurate prediction of the patient's 3D map of proton relative stopping power (RSP) compared to water. This remains challenging due to inaccuracies inherent in single-energy computed tomography (SECT) calibration. Recent advancements in spectral x-ray CT (xCT) and proton CT (pCT) have shown improved RSP estimation compared to traditional SECT methods. This study aims to provide the first comparison of the imaging and RSP estimation performance among dual-energy CT (DECT) and photon-counting CT (PCCT) scanners, and a pCT system prototype.Approach.Two phantoms were scanned with the three systems for their performance characterisation: a plastic phantom, filled with water and containing four plastic inserts and a wood insert, and a heterogeneous biological phantom, containing a formalin-stabilised bovine specimen. RSP maps were generated by converting CT numbers to RSP using a calibration based on low- and high-energy xCT images, while pCT utilised a distance-driven filtered back projection algorithm for RSP reconstruction. Spatial resolution, noise, and RSP accuracy were compared across the resulting images.Main results.All three systems exhibited similar spatial resolution of around 0.54 lp/mm for the plastic phantom. The PCCT images were less noisy than the DECT images at the same dose level. The lowest mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) of RSP,(0.28±0.07)%, was obtained with the pCT system, compared to MAPE values of(0.51±0.08)%and(0.80±0.08)%for the DECT- and PCCT-based methods, respectively. For the biological phantom, the xCT-based methods resulted in higher RSP values in most of the voxels compared to pCT.Significance.The pCT system yielded the most accurate estimation of RSP values for the plastic materials, and was thus used to benchmark the xCT calibration performance on the biological phantom. This study underlined the potential benefits and constraints of utilising such a novelex-vivophantom for inter-centre surveys in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elena Fogazzi
- Physics Department, University of Trento, Trento, TN, Italy
- Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications (TIFPA), Italian National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Trento, TN, Italy
| | - Guyue Hu
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, LMU Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Mara Bruzzi
- Italian National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Florence section, Sesto Fiorentino, FI, Italy
- Physics and Astronomy Department, University of Florence, Sesto Fiorentino, FI, Italy
| | - Paolo Farace
- Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications (TIFPA), Italian National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Trento, TN, Italy
- Medical Physics Unit, Hospital of Trento, Azienda Provinciale per i Servizi Sanitari (APSS), Trento, Italy
| | - Thomas Kröncke
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Katharina Niepel
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, LMU Munich, Garching, Germany
| | - Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Franka Risch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Bastian Sabel
- Department of Radiology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Monica Scaringella
- Italian National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Florence section, Sesto Fiorentino, FI, Italy
| | - Florian Schwarz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Francesco Tommasino
- Physics Department, University of Trento, Trento, TN, Italy
- Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications (TIFPA), Italian National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Trento, TN, Italy
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Centre (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Carlo Civinini
- Italian National Institute of Nuclear Physics (INFN), Florence section, Sesto Fiorentino, FI, Italy
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics, Faculty of Physics, LMU Munich, Garching, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Niepel K, Tattenberg S, Marants R, Hu G, Bortfeld T, Verburg J, Sudhyadhom A, Landry G, Parodi K. Validation of dual-energy CT-based composition analysis using fresh animal tissues and composition-optimized tissue equivalent samples. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:165033. [PMID: 39074494 PMCID: PMC11334240 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad68bc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2022] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/29/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
Objective.Proton therapy allows for highly conformal dose deposition, but is sensitive to range uncertainties. Several approaches currently under development measure composition-dependent secondary radiation to monitor the delivered proton rangein-vivo. To fully utilize these methods, an estimate of the elemental composition of the patient's tissue is often needed.Approach.A published dual-energy computed tomography (DECT)-based composition-extraction algorithm was validated against reference compositions obtained with two independent methods. For this purpose, a set of phantoms containing either fresh porcine tissue or tissue-mimicking samples with known, realistic compositions were imaged with a CT scanner at two different energies. Then, the prompt gamma-ray (PG) signal during proton irradiation was measured with a PG detector prototype. The PG workflow used pre-calculated Monte Carlo simulations to obtain an optimized estimate of the sample's carbon and oxygen contents. The compositions were also assessed with chemical combustion analysis (CCA), and the stopping-power ratio (SPR) was measured with a multi-layer ionization chamber. The DECT images were used to calculate SPR-, density- and elemental composition maps, and to assign voxel-wise compositions from a selection of human tissues. For a more comprehensive set of reference compositions, the original selection was extended by 135 additional tissues, corresponding to spongiosa, high-density bones and low-density tissues.Results.The root-mean-square error for the soft tissue carbon and oxygen content was 8.5 wt% and 9.5 wt% relative to the CCA result and 2.1 wt% and 10.3 wt% relative to the PG result. The phosphorous and calcium content were predicted within 0.4 wt% and 1.1 wt% of the CCA results, respectively. The largest discrepancies were encountered in samples whose composition deviated the most from tabulated compositions or that were more inhomogeneous.Significance.Overall, DECT-based composition estimations of relevant elements were in equal or better agreement with the ground truth than the established SECT-approach and could contribute toin-vivodose verification measurements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Niepel
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching, Germany
| | - Sebastian Tattenberg
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States of America
| | - Raanan Marants
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, United States of America
| | - Guyue Hu
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching, Germany
| | - Thomas Bortfeld
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States of America
| | - Joost Verburg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, United States of America
| | - Atchar Sudhyadhom
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, United States of America
| | - Guillaume Landry
- Department of Radiation Oncology, LMU University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, a partnership between DKFZ and LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany
- Bavarian Cancer Research Center (BZKF), Munich, Germany
| | - Katia Parodi
- Department of Medical Physics, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (LMU Munich), Garching, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich, a partnership between DKFZ and LMU University Hospital Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tarp IS, Taasti VT, Jensen MF, Vestergaard A, Jensen K. Benefit of range uncertainty reduction in robust optimisation for proton therapy of brain, head-and-neck and breast cancer patients. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 31:100632. [PMID: 39257572 PMCID: PMC11386293 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Revised: 08/14/2024] [Accepted: 08/18/2024] [Indexed: 09/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose The primary cause of range uncertainty in proton therapy is inaccuracy in estimating the stopping-power ratio from computed tomography. This study examined the impact on dose-volume metrics by reducing range uncertainty in robust optimisation for a diverse patient cohort and determined the level of range uncertainty that resulted in a relevant reduction in doses to organs-at-risk (OARs). Materials and Methods The effect of reducing range uncertainty on OAR doses was evaluated by robustly optimising six proton plans with varying range uncertainty levels (ranging from 3.5% in the original plan to 1.0%), keeping setup uncertainty fixed. All plans used the initial clinical treatment plan's beam directions and optimisation objectives and were optimised until a clinically acceptable plan was achieved across all setup and range scenarios. The effect of reduced range uncertainty on dose-volume metrics for OARs near the target was evaluated. This study included 30 brain cancer patients, as well as five head-and-neck and five breast cancer patients, investigating the relevance of reducing range uncertainty when different setup uncertainties were used. Results Lowering range uncertainty slightly reduced the nominal dose to surrounding tissue. For body volume receiving 80% of the prescribed dose, reducing range uncertainty from 3.5% to 2.0% resulted in a median decrease of 4 cm3 for the brain, 17 cm3 for head-and-neck, and 27 cm3 for breast cancer patients. Conclusions Reducing range uncertainty in robust optimisation showed a reduction in dose to OARs. The clinical relevance depends on the affected organs and the clinical dose constraints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivanka Sojat Tarp
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Vicki Trier Taasti
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Anne Vestergaard
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Kenneth Jensen
- Danish Centre for Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pettersson E, Thilander-Klang A, Bäck A. Prediction of proton stopping power ratios using dual-energy CT basis material decomposition. Med Phys 2024; 51:881-897. [PMID: 38194501 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Proton radiotherapy treatment plans are currently restricted by the range uncertainties originating from the stopping power ratio (SPR) prediction based on single-energy computed tomography (SECT). Various studies have shown that multi-energy CT (MECT) can reduce the range uncertainties due to medical implant materials and age-related variations in tissue composition. None of these has directly applied the basis material density (MD) images produced by projection-based MECT systems for SPR prediction. PURPOSE To present and evaluate a novel proton SPR prediction method based on MD images from dual-energy CT (DECT), which could reduce the range uncertainties currently associated with proton radiotherapy. METHODS A theoretical basis material decomposition into water and iodine material densities was performed for various pediatric and adult human reference tissues, as well as other non-tissue materials, by minimizing the root-mean-square relative attenuation error in the energy interval from 40 to 140 keV. A model (here called MD-SPR) mapping predicted MDs to theoretically calculated reference SPRs was created with locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (LOWESS) data-fitting. The goodness of fit of the MD-SPR model was evaluated for the included reference tissues. MD images of two electron density phantoms, combined to form a head- and an abdomen-sized phantom setup, were acquired with a clinical projection-based fast-kV switching DECT scanner. The MD images were compared to the theoretically predicted MDs of the tissue surrogates and other non-tissue materials in the phantoms, as well as used for input to the MD-SPR model for generation of SPR images. The SPR images were subsequently compared to theoretical reference SPRs of the materials in the phantoms, as well as to SPR images from a commercial algorithm (DirectSPR, Siemens Healthineers, Forchheim, Germany) using image-based consecutive scan DECT for the same phantom setups. RESULTS The predicted SPRs of the tissue surrogates were similar for MD-SPR and DirectSPR, where the adipose and bone tissue surrogates were within 1% difference to the reference SPRs, while other non-adipose soft tissue surrogates (breast, brain, liver, muscle) were all underestimated by between -0.7% and -1.8%. The SPRs of the non-tissue materials (polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA), polyether ether ketone (PEEK), graphite and Teflon) were within 2.8% for MD-SPR images, compared to 6.8% for DirectSPR. CONCLUSIONS The MD-SPR model performed similar compared to other published methods for the human reference tissues. The SPR prediction for tissue surrogates was similar to DirectSPR and showed potential to improve SPR prediction for non-tissue materials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Pettersson
- Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Therapeutic Radiation Physics, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anne Thilander-Klang
- Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Diagnostic Radiation Physics, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna Bäck
- Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Therapeutic Radiation Physics, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Papalazarou C, Qamhiyeh S, Kaatee R, De Rouck J, Decabooter E, Hilgers GC, Salvo K, van Wingerden J, Bosmans H, van der Heyden B, Pittomvils G, Bogaert E. Survey on fan-beam computed tomography for radiotherapy: Current implementation and future perspectives of motion management and surface guidance devices. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100523. [PMID: 38187170 PMCID: PMC10767488 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2023.100523] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose This work reports on the results of a survey performed on the use of computed tomography (CT) imaging for motion management, surface guidance devices, and their quality assurance (QA). Additionally, it details the collected user insights regarding professional needs in CT for radiotherapy. The purpose of the survey is to understand current practice, professional needs and future directions in the field of fan-beam CT in radiation therapy (RT). Materials and methods An online institutional survey was conducted between 1-Sep-2022 and 10-Oct-2022 among medical physics experts at Belgian and Dutch radiotherapy institutions, to assess the current status, challenges, and future directions of motion management and surface image-guided radiotherapy. The survey consisted of a maximum of 143 questions, with the exact number depending on participants' responses. Results The response rate was 66 % (31/47). Respiratory management was reported as standard practice in all but one institution; surface imaging during CT-simulation was reported in ten institutions. QA procedures are applied with varying frequencies and methodologies, primarily with commercial anatomy-like phantoms. Surface guidance users report employing commercial static and dynamic phantoms. Four main subjects are considered clinically important by the respondents: surface guidance, CT protocol optimisation, implementing gated imaging (4DCT, breath-hold), and a tattoo-less workflow. Conclusions The survey highlights the scattered pattern of QA procedures for respiratory motion management, indicating the need for well-defined, unambiguous, and practicable guidelines. Surface guidance is considered one of the most important techniques that should be implemented in the clinical radiotherapy simulation workflow.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sima Qamhiyeh
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robert Kaatee
- Radiotherapy Institute Friesland, Leeuwarden, the Netherlands
| | - Joke De Rouck
- Department of Radiotherapy, AZ Sint Lucas, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Esther Decabooter
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro Clinic), GROW School for Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Centre+, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Koen Salvo
- Department of Radiotherapy, AZ Sint-Maarten, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Jacobus van Wingerden
- Department of Medical Physics, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Leidschendam, the Netherlands
| | - Hilde Bosmans
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium
- Medical Physics and Quality Assessment, Department of Imaging and Pathology, KULeuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Brent van der Heyden
- Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- IBiTech-MEDISIP, Department of Electronics and Information Systems, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Geert Pittomvils
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Evelien Bogaert
- Department of Radiation-Oncology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|