Recent advances on anti-angiogenic multi-receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma

Lenvatinib acts on platelet‑derived growth factor receptor β to suppress the malignant behaviors of gastric cancer cells

Given the limited treatment options and high mortality rates associated with gastric cancer, there is a need to explore novel therapeutic options. The present study aimed to investigate the efficacy of lenvatinib, a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor, in mitigating the progress of gastric cancer in vitro. Comprehensive analyses were conducted to assess the impact of lenvatinib on gastric cancer cells, focusing on the inhibition of viability, suppression of proliferation, induction of apoptosis and reduction of metastatic potential. The effects of lenvatinib on these activities were determined using 5-ethynyl-2'-deoxyuridine staining, colony formation assay, flow cytometry, western blotting, scratch assay and Transwell assay. In addition, bioinformatics analyses were employed to identify key regulatory targets of lenvatinib, with particular attention given to platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFRB). In addition, the effects of PDGFRB overexpression on the regulation of lenvatinib were explored. Lenvatinib demonstrated significant inhibitory effects on the viability, proliferation and metastatic capabilities of MKN45 and HGC27 gastric cancer cell lines. Bioinformatics analyses identified PDGFRB as a crucial target of lenvatinib, with its downregulation showing promise in enhancing overall survival rates of patients with gastric cancer. By contrast, PDGFRB overexpression reversed the effects of lenvatinib on cells. The present findings underscore the potential of lenvatinib as a promising therapeutic option in the treatment of gastric cancer. By elucidating its mechanism of action and identifying PDGFRB as a primary target, the present study may aid further clinical advancements.

Targeted anti-angiogenesis therapy for advanced osteosarcoma

To date, despite extensive research, the prognosis of advanced osteosarcoma has not improved significantly. Thus, patients experience a reduced survival rate, suggesting that a reevaluation of current treatment strategies is required. Recently, in addition to routine surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, researchers have explored more effective and safer treatments, including targeted therapy, immunotherapy, anti-angiogenesis therapy, metabolic targets therapy, and nanomedicine therapy. The tumorigenesis and development of osteosarcoma is closely related to angiogenesis. Thus, anti-angiogenesis therapy is crucial to treat osteosarcoma; however, recent clinical trials found that it has insufficient efficacy. To solve this problem, the causes of treatment failure and improve treatment strategies should be investigated. This review focuses on summarizing the pathophysiological mechanisms of angiogenesis in osteosarcoma and recent advances in anti-angiogenesis treatment of osteosarcoma. We also discuss some clinical studies, with the aim of providing new ideas to improve treatment strategies for osteosarcoma and the prognosis of patients.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors in osteosarcoma: Adapting treatment strategiesa

Osteosarcoma (OS) is an aggressive primary bone malignancy that metastasizes rapidly. The standard of care has changed little over the previous four decades, and survival rates have plateaued. In this context, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) emerge as potential treatments. A literature search was conducted to collect data related to receptor tyrosine kinase genetic alterations and expression in OS specimens. Gene amplification and protein expression of these receptors were linked to prognosis and tumor behavior. Relevant TKIs were evaluated as monotherapies and as parts of combination therapies. Certain TKIs, such as apatinib, regorafenib, and cabozantinib, present a potential therapeutic avenue for OS patients, especially when combined with chemotherapy. Producing long-lasting responses and enhancing quality of life remain key goals in OS treatment. To this effect, optimizing the use of TKIs by identifying biomarkers predictive of response and assessing promising TKIs in larger-scale trials to validate the efficacy and safety outcomes relative to these drugs reported in phase II clinical trials. To this effect, it is necessary to identify biomarkers predictive of response to TKIs in larger-scale trials and to validate the efficacy and safety of these drugs reported in phase II clinical trials.

Outcome Analysis of Treatment Modalities for Thoracic Sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Primary chest wall sarcomas are a rare and heterogeneous group of chest wall tumors that require multimodal oncologic and surgical therapy. The aim of this study was to review our experience regarding the surgical treatment of chest wall sarcomas, evaluating the short- and long-term results.

METHODS

In this retrospective single-center study, patients who underwent surgery for soft tissue and bone sarcoma of the chest wall between 1999 and 2018 were included. We analyzed the oncologic and surgical outcomes of chest wall resections and reconstructions, assessing overall and recurrence-free survival and the associated clinical factors.

RESULTS

In total, 44 patients underwent chest wall resection for primary chest wall sarcoma, of which 18 (41%) received surgery only, 10 (23%) received additional chemoradiotherapy, 7% (3) received surgery with chemotherapy, and 30% (13) received radiotherapy in addition to surgery. No perioperative mortality occurred. Five-year overall survival was 51.5% (CI 95%: 36.1-73.4%), and median overall survival was 1973 days (CI 95% 1461; -). As determined in the univariate analysis, the presence of metastasis upon admission and tumor grade were significantly associated with shorter survival (p = 0.037 and p < 0.01, respectively). Five-year recurrence-free survival was 71.5% (95% CI 57.6%; 88.7%). Tumor resection margins and metastatic disease upon diagnosis were significantly associated with recurrence-free survival (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Surgical therapy is the cornerstone of the treatment of chest wall sarcomas and can be performed safely. Metastasis and high tumor grade have a negative influence on overall survival, while tumor margins and metastasis have a negative influence on local recurrence.