1
|
Campbell KN, Gesualdo L, Murphy E, Rheault MN, Srivastava T, Tesar V, Komers R, Trachtman H. Sparsentan for Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis in the DUET Open-Label Extension: Long-term Efficacy and Safety. Kidney Med 2024; 6:100833. [PMID: 38831932 PMCID: PMC11145552 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2024.100833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Rationale & Objective Sparsentan is a novel, non-immunosuppressive, single-molecule, dual endothelin angiotensin receptor antagonist (DEARA) examined in the ongoing phase 2 DUET trial for focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). In the DUET 8-week double-blind period, sparsentan resulted in greater proteinuria reduction versus irbesartan. We report the long-term efficacy and safety of sparsentan during the open-label extension over more than 4 years. Study Design Patients were examined from their first sparsentan dose (double-blind period or open-label extension) through 4.6 years. Setting & Participants Patients with FSGS, excluding secondary FSGS. Intervention Sparsentan (200, 400, and 800 mg/d). Outcomes Urinary protein-creatinine ratio, FSGS partial remission endpoint (urinary protein-creatinine ratio ≤1.5 g/g and >40% reduction from baseline), estimated glomerular filtration rate, and blood pressure approximately every 12 weeks. Treatment-emergent adverse events by year and cases/100 patient-years. Results 109 patients were enrolled; 108 received ≥1 sparsentan dose; 103 entered the open-label extension (68 sparsentan, 35 irbesartan during the double-blind period). Sparsentan was ongoing in 45/108 patients (41.7%); median time to treatment discontinuation was 3.9 years (95% CI, 2.6-5.2). Mean percent proteinuria reduction from baseline was sustained through follow-up. Achieving partial remission within 9 months of first sparsentan dose (52.8% of patients) versus not achieving (47.2%) was associated with significantly slower rate of estimated glomerular filtration rate decline over the entire treatment period (-2.70 vs -6.56; P = 0.03) and in the first 2 years (-1.69 vs -6.46; P = 0.03). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (>9 cases/100 patient-years) were headache, peripheral edema, upper respiratory infection, hyperkalemia, and hypotension. Peripheral edema and hypotension declined from year 1 (13.9% and 15.7% of patients, respectively) to ≤4% in years ≥2. There were no cases of heart failure and no patient deaths. Limitations The open-label extension does not include a comparison group. Conclusions Long-term sparsentan treatment showed sustained proteinuria reduction and a consistent safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Vladimir Tesar
- Charles University, General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Trachtman H, Diva U, Murphy E, Wang K, Inrig J, Komers R. Implications of Complete Proteinuria Remission at any Time in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: Sparsentan DUET Trial. Kidney Int Rep 2023; 8:2017-2028. [PMID: 37850006 PMCID: PMC10577371 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2023.07.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Revised: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a rare glomerular disease with high unmet clinical need. Interest in proteinuria as a surrogate end point for regulatory approval of novel treatments has increased. We assessed the relationship between achieving complete remission (CR) of proteinuria at least once during follow-up and long-term kidney outcomes. Methods This post hoc analysis included all patients enrolled in the DUET trial of sparsentan in FSGS and the open-label extension (OLE). Evaluations occurred every 12 weeks, including blood pressure (BP), edema, proteinuria, and kidney function. CR was defined as a urine protein/creatinine ratio ≤0.3g/g in a first morning urine sample. Results A total of 108 patients who received ≥1 sparsentan dose were included in this study. During a median follow-up of 47.0 months, 46 patients (43%) experienced ≥1 CR, 61% occurring within 12 months of starting sparsentan. There was an increased likelihood of CR with a higher sparsentan dose or baseline subnephrotic-range proteinuria. Achieving ≥1 CR was associated with significantly slower rate of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline versus non-CR patients (P < 0.05). Use of immunosuppressive agents was more frequent in patients who achieved a CR. However, the antiproteinuric effect of sparsentan was additive to that achieved with concomitant immunosuppressive treatment. No unanticipated adverse events occurred. Conclusion We conclude that sparsentan can be safely administered for extended periods and exerts a sustained antiproteinuric effect. Achievement of CR at any time during follow-up, even if it is not sustained, may be an indicator of a favorable response to treatment and a predictor of improved kidney function outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard Trachtman
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Ulysses Diva
- Biometrics, Travere Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| | - Edward Murphy
- Biometrics, Travere Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| | - Kaijun Wang
- Biometrics, Travere Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jula Inrig
- Nephrology, Travere Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| | - Radko Komers
- Nephrology, Travere Therapeutics, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Efficacy and Safety of ACE Inhibitor and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Therapies in Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Kidney Med 2022; 4:100457. [PMID: 35518835 PMCID: PMC9065901 DOI: 10.1016/j.xkme.2022.100457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Rationale and Objective Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker therapy (renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system [RAAS] inhibitor) to control proteinuria in primary and genetic focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) follows guidelines based on other proteinuria-related kidney diseases. There is no consensus on the efficacy and safety of RAAS inhibitor therapies in primary and genetic FSGS. This systematic review assessed the effects of RAAS inhibitor therapy on kidney outcomes in these patients. Study Design Systematic review of randomized controlled trials, interventional nonrandomized studies, observational studies, and retrospective studies. Setting & Study Populations Patients with primary and genetic FSGS. Selection Criteria for Studies PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase. Data Extraction 2 investigators independently screened studies and extracted data. Analytical Approach Results were summarized as the ratio of means (ROM) between baseline and follow-up measurements or as the hazard ratio using random-effects models. Results 30 publications were selected; 5 were controlled trials (4 randomized controlled trials). 8 assessed RAAS inhibitor monotherapy, while the rest studied RAAS inhibitors in combination with other drugs, mainly immunosuppressants. On average, a 32% proteinuria reduction (ROM, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.47-0.98) and no change in creatinine clearance (ROM, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77-1.16) from baseline to the last reported follow-up was observed in patients treated with RAAS inhibitor monotherapy. When a RAAS inhibitor was combined with other drugs, a 72% proteinuria reduction was observed from baseline to the last reported follow-up (ROM, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.08-0.75). The published data did not allow for the assessment of the effects of RAAS inhibitor monotherapy on estimated glomerular filtration rate and end-stage kidney disease risks. Limitations Large study heterogeneity in design, patient populations, and treatment regimens. No access to individual patient-level data. Conclusions This review supports the tendency to observe a proteinuria reduction with RAAS inhibitors in patients with primary FSGS. RAAS inhibitor monotherapy was associated with maintained kidney function, as shown by no change in creatinine clearance. Strong evidence to quantify the effects of RAAS inhibitor monotherapy on end-stage kidney disease and glomerular filtration rate was lacking. Larger, well-designed clinical trials are needed to better understand the effects of RAAS inhibitors on primary FSGS.
Collapse
|
4
|
Komers R, Diva U, Inrig JK, Loewen A, Trachtman H, Rote WE. Study Design of the Phase 3 Sparsentan Versus Irbesartan (DUPLEX) Study in Patients With Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis. Kidney Int Rep 2020; 5:494-502. [PMID: 32274453 PMCID: PMC7136327 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2019.12.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Revised: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/31/2019] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS), a histologic lesion in the kidney caused by varied pathophysiological processes, leads to end-stage kidney disease in a large proportion of patients. Sparsentan is a first-in-class orally active compound combining endothelin type A (ETA) receptor blockade with angiotensin II type 1 (AT1) receptor antagonism in a single molecule. A Randomized, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Parallel, Active-Control Study of the Effects of Sparsentan, a Dual Endothelin Receptor and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker, on Renal Outcomes in Patients With Primary FSGS (DUPLEX) study evaluates the long-term antiproteinuric efficacy, nephroprotective potential, and safety profile of sparsentan compared with an AT1 receptor blocker alone in patients with FSGS. Methods DUPLEX is a multicenter, international, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study of sparsentan in patients with FSGS. Approximately 300 patients aged 8 to 75 years, inclusive (United States), and 18 to 75 years, inclusive (outside United States) will be randomized 1:1 to daily treatment with sparsentan or irbesartan. After renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitor washout, treatment will be administered for 108 weeks, with the final assessment at week 112, four weeks after withdrawal of study drug. Results The primary endpoint will be the slope of estimated glomerular filtration rate from week 6 to week 108. A novel surrogate efficacy endpoint, the proportion of patients achieving urinary protein-to-creatinine (UP/C) ratio of ≤1.5 g/g and >40% reduction from baseline in UP/C (FSGS partial remission endpoint: FPRE), will be evaluated at a planned interim analysis at week 36. Safety and tolerability of sparsentan will also be assessed. Conclusion The phase 3 DUPLEX study will characterize the long-term antiproteinuric efficacy and nephroprotective potential of dual ETA and AT1 receptor blockade with sparsentan in patients with FSGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radko Komers
- Nephrology, Retrophin, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| | - Ulysses Diva
- Biometrics, Retrophin, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| | - Jula K Inrig
- Therapeutic Science and Strategy Unit, IQVIA, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| | - Andrea Loewen
- Research and Development, Retrophin, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| | - Howard Trachtman
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - William E Rote
- Research and Development, Retrophin, Inc., San Diego, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Trachtman H, Nelson P, Adler S, Campbell KN, Chaudhuri A, Derebail VK, Gambaro G, Gesualdo L, Gipson DS, Hogan J, Lieberman K, Marder B, Meyers KE, Mustafa E, Radhakrishnan J, Srivastava T, Stepanians M, Tesar V, Zhdanova O, Komers R. DUET: A Phase 2 Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Sparsentan in Patients with FSGS. J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 29:2745-2754. [PMID: 30361325 PMCID: PMC6218860 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2018010091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 126] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2018] [Accepted: 09/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated and compared the effects of sparsentan, a dual endothelin type A (ETA) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist, with those of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonist irbesartan in patients with primary FSGS. METHODS In this phase 2, randomized, double-blind, active-control Efficacy and Safety of Sparsentan (RE-021), a Dual Endothelin Receptor and Angiotensin Receptor Blocker, in Patients with Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis (FSGS): A Randomized, Double-blind, Active-Control, Dose-Escalation Study (DUET), patients aged 8-75 years with biopsy-proven FSGS, eGFR>30 ml/min per 1.73 m2, and urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UP/C) ≥1.0 g/g received sparsentan (200, 400, or 800 mg/d) or irbesartan (300 mg/d) for 8 weeks, followed by open-label sparsentan only. End points at week 8 were reduction from baseline in UP/C (primary) and proportion of patients achieving FSGS partial remission end point (FPRE) (UP/C: ≤1.5 g/g and >40% reduction [secondary]). RESULTS Of 109 patients randomized, 96 received study drugs and had baseline and week 8 UP/C measurements. Sparsentan-treated patients had greater reductions in UP/C than irbesartan-treated patients did when all doses (45% versus 19%; P=0.006) or the 400 and 800 mg doses (47% versus 19%; P=0.01) were pooled for analysis. The FSGS partial remission end point was achieved in 28% of sparsentan-treated and 9% of irbesartan-treated patients (P=0.04). After 8 weeks of treatment, BP was reduced with sparsentan but not irbesartan, and eGFR was stable with both treatments. Overall, the incidence of adverse events was similar between groups. Hypotension and edema were more common among sparsentan-treated patients but did not result in study withdrawals. CONCLUSIONS Patients with FSGS achieved significantly greater reductions in proteinuria after 8 weeks of sparsentan versus irbesartan. Sparsentan was safe and well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard Trachtman
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, New York University School of Medicine, Langone Medical Center, New York, New York;
| | - Peter Nelson
- Division of Nephrology and Kidney Research Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Sharon Adler
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-University of California, Los Angeles Medical Center, Torrance, California
| | - Kirk N Campbell
- Division of Nephrology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Abanti Chaudhuri
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California
| | - Vimal Kumar Derebail
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, University of North Carolina Kidney Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Giovanni Gambaro
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Fondazione Policlinico A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy
| | - Loreto Gesualdo
- Nephrology Unit, Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation (DETO), Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico di Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Debbie S Gipson
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Jonathan Hogan
- Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Kenneth Lieberman
- Department of Pediatric Nephrology, Joseph M. Sanzari Children's Hospital, Hackensack University Medical Center, Hackensack, New Jersey
- Seton Hall-Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Hackensack, New Jersey
| | - Brad Marder
- Division of Transplant Research, Colorado Kidney Care, Denver, Colorado
| | - Kevin Edward Meyers
- Division of Nephrology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Esmat Mustafa
- Department of Nephrology and Research Division, Arizona Kidney Disease and Hypertension Center, Phoenix, Arizona
| | | | - Tarak Srivastava
- Children's Mercy Hospital, Kansas City, Missouri
- University of Missouri School of Medicine, Kansas City, Missouri
| | | | - Vladimír Tesar
- Department of Nephrology, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Olga Zhdanova
- Division of Nephrology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; and
| | - Radko Komers
- Department of Research & Development, Retrophin, Inc., San Diego, California
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Troost JP, Trachtman H, Nachman PH, Kretzler M, Spino C, Komers R, Tuller S, Perumal K, Massengill SF, Kamil ES, Oh G, Selewski DT, Gipson P, Gipson DS. An Outcomes-Based Definition of Proteinuria Remission in Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 13:414-421. [PMID: 29167190 PMCID: PMC5967666 DOI: 10.2215/cjn.04780517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2017] [Accepted: 10/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Proteinuria is used as an indicator of FSGS disease activity, but its use as a clinical trial end point is not universally accepted. The goal of this study was to refine proteinuria definitions associated with long-term kidney survival. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS Data on 466 patients with primary FSGS with proteinuria (urine protein-to-creatinine ratio >1 g/g) were analyzed from five independent cohorts. Proteinuria by months 1, 4, and 8 after study baseline was categorized by conventional definitions of complete (<0.3 g/g) and partial remission (<3.5 g/g and 50% reduction in proteinuria). Novel remission definitions were explored using receiver operating curves. Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate the associations of proteinuria with progression to ESRD or a 50% loss in kidney function. Propensity score-adjusted Cox proportional hazards models were used to adjust for baseline proteinuria, eGFR, and therapy. RESULTS In the initial derivation cohort, conventional partial remission was not associated with kidney survival. A novel definition of partial remission (40% proteinuria reduction and proteinuria<1.5 g/g) on the basis of receiver operating curve analyses of 89 patients was identified (Sensitivity=0.70; Specificity=0.77). In the validation cohort analyses, complete remission was associated with better prognosis (6 out of 41 patients progressed to kidney failure; 6.6 per 100 patient-years) as was the novel partial remission (13 out of 71 progressed; 8.5 per 100 patient-years), compared with those with no response (51 out of 116 progressed; 20.1 per 100 patient-years). Conventional partial remission at month 8, but not month 4, was also associated with better response (19 out of 85 patients progressed; risk=10.4 per 100 patient-years). Propensity score-adjusted analyses showed the novel partial remission was associated with less progression at months 4 and 8 (month 4: hazard ratio, 0.50; P=0.01; month 8: hazard ratio, 0.30; P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS Reaching either a complete or partial remission using a novel or conventional definition was associated with better long-term outcomes in patients with FSGS. PODCAST This article contains a podcast at https://www.asn-online.org/media/podcast/CJASN/2018_02_20_CJASNPodcast_18_3_T.mp3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan P Troost
- Due to the number of contributing authors, the affiliations are provided in the Supplemental Material
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Gipson DS, Selewski DT, Massengill SF, Modes MM, Desmond H, Lee L, Kamil E, Elliott MR, Adler SG, Oh G, Lafayette RA, Gipson PE, Sinha A, Bagga A, Pesenson A, Courtlandt C, Spino C, Eikstadt R, Pitter R, Attalla S, Waldo A, Winneker R, Carlozzi NE, Troost JP, Smokler I, Stone M. NephCure Accelerating Cures Institute: A Multidisciplinary Consortium to Improve Care for Nephrotic Syndrome. Kidney Int Rep 2017; 3:439-446. [PMID: 29725648 PMCID: PMC5932133 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2017.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Revised: 11/14/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction NephCure Accelerating Cures Institute (NACI) is a collaborative organization sponsored by NephCure Kidney International and the University of Michigan. The Institute is composed of 7 cores designed to improve treatment options and outcomes for patients with glomerular disease: Clinical Trials Network, Data Warehouse, Patient-Reported Outcomes (PRO) and Endpoints Consortium, Clinical Trials Consulting Team, Quality Initiatives, Education and Engagement, and Data Coordinating Center. Methods The Trials Network includes 22 community- and hospital-based nephrology practices, 14 of which are trial-only sites. Eight sites participate in the NACI Registry, and as of October 2017, 1054 patients are enrolled with diagnoses including but not limited to focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, minimal change disease, membranous nephropathy, IgA nephropathy, and childhood-onset nephrotic syndrome. By using electronic health record data extraction, robust and efficient clinical data are captured while minimizing the burden to site-based network staff. Results The Data Warehouse includes her-extracted data from registry patients, PRO development data, and data from completed observational studies and clinical trials. The Clinical Trial Consulting Team provides support for trial design in rare diseases leveraging these data. The PRO and Endpoints Consortium develops shorter-term endpoints while capturing the patient-reported significance of interventions under study. The Quality Initiatives and Education/Engagement cores elevate the level of care for patients. The Data Coordinating Center manages the analysis and operations of the Institute. Conclusion By engaging with patients, academia, industry, and patient advocate community representatives, including our Patient Advisory Board, NACI strives for better outcomes and treatments using evidence-based support for clinical trial design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debbie S Gipson
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - David T Selewski
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Susan F Massengill
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Levine Children's Hospital, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Hailey Desmond
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Lauren Lee
- NephCure Kidney International, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elaine Kamil
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, David Geffen School of Medicine at The University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Sharon G Adler
- Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Gia Oh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Richard A Lafayette
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Patrick E Gipson
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Aditi Sinha
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | - Arvind Bagga
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi, India
| | | | - Cheryl Courtlandt
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, Levine Children's Hospital, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Cathie Spino
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Richard Eikstadt
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Renée Pitter
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Samara Attalla
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Anne Waldo
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Richard Winneker
- NephCure Kidney International, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Noelle E Carlozzi
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Jonathan P Troost
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, C.S. Mott Children's Hospital, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Irving Smokler
- NephCure Kidney International, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mark Stone
- NephCure Kidney International, King of Prussia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
Focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a leading cause of kidney disease worldwide. The presumed etiology of primary FSGS is a plasma factor with responsiveness to immunosuppressive therapy and a risk of recurrence after kidney transplant-important disease characteristics. In contrast, adaptive FSGS is associated with excessive nephron workload due to increased body size, reduced nephron capacity, or single glomerular hyperfiltration associated with certain diseases. Additional etiologies are now recognized as drivers of FSGS: high-penetrance genetic FSGS due to mutations in one of nearly 40 genes, virus-associated FSGS, and medication-associated FSGS. Emerging data support the identification of a sixth category: APOL1 risk allele-associated FSGS in individuals with sub-Saharan ancestry. The classification of a particular patient with FSGS relies on integration of findings from clinical history, laboratory testing, kidney biopsy, and in some patients, genetic testing. The kidney biopsy can be helpful, with clues provided by features on light microscopy (e.g, glomerular size, histologic variant of FSGS, microcystic tubular changes, and tubular hypertrophy), immunofluorescence (e.g, to rule out other primary glomerulopathies), and electron microscopy (e.g., extent of podocyte foot process effacement, podocyte microvillous transformation, and tubuloreticular inclusions). A complete assessment of renal histology is important for establishing the parenchymal setting of segmental glomerulosclerosis, distinguishing FSGS associated with one of many other glomerular diseases from the clinical-pathologic syndrome of FSGS. Genetic testing is beneficial in particular clinical settings. Identifying the etiology of FSGS guides selection of therapy and provides prognostic insight. Much progress has been made in our understanding of FSGS, but important outstanding issues remain, including the identity of the plasma factor believed to be responsible for primary FSGS, the value of routine implementation of genetic testing, and the identification of more effective and less toxic therapeutic interventions for FSGS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Avi Z. Rosenberg
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; and
- Kidney Disease Section, Kidney Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jeffrey B. Kopp
- Department of Pathology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland; and
- Kidney Disease Section, Kidney Diseases Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Efficacy and Safety of Sparsentan Compared With Irbesartan in Patients With Primary Focal Segmental Glomerulosclerosis: Randomized, Controlled Trial Design (DUET). Kidney Int Rep 2017; 2:654-664. [PMID: 29142983 PMCID: PMC5678638 DOI: 10.1016/j.ekir.2017.02.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2016] [Revised: 02/05/2017] [Accepted: 02/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Primary focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS) is a leading cause of nephrotic syndrome and end-stage renal disease. There are no US Food and Drug Administration−approved therapies for FSGS, and treatment often fails to reduce proteinuria. Endothelin is an important factor in the pathophysiology of podocyte disorders, including FSGS. Sparsentan is a first-in-class, orally active, dual-acting angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) and highly selective endothelin Type A receptor antagonist. This study is designed to evaluate whether sparsentan lowers proteinuria compared with an ARB alone and has a favorable safety profile in patients with FSGS. Methods DUET is a phase 2, randomized, active-control, dose-escalation study with an 8-week, fixed-dose, double-blind period followed by 136 weeks of open-label sparsentan treatment. Patients aged 8 to 75 years with primary FSGS will be randomized to treatment with sparsentan or irbesartan for 8 weeks. Results The primary efficacy objective is to test the hypothesis that sparsentan over the dose range (200 mg, 400 mg, or 800 mg daily) is superior to irbesartan (300 mg daily) in decreasing the urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPC) from baseline to 8 weeks postrandomization. As secondary objectives, the trial will evaluate the proportion of patients who achieve prespecified targets of UPC reduction, changes in laboratory and quality-of-life indices, and detailed safety analysis. Analyses will be conducted at the end of the double-blind (week 8) and open-label (week 144) periods. Discussion This study will provide important evidence on whether dual ARB and endothelin blockade may be an effective therapeutic strategy for FSGS and may provide the rationale for next-phase trials.
Collapse
|