Midterm Outcomes of Crosslinked Acellular Bovine Jugular Vein Conduit for Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Reconstruction

Decellularized bovine jugular vein and hand-sewn ePTFE valved conduit for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction in children undergoing Ross procedure

Background

The Ross procedure is recommended as an optimal aortic valve replacement (AVR) in children and young adults due to several advantages. Nevertheless, multiple reconstructions of the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) with new valve conduits have caused some concern regarding the durability of the Ross AVR. Decellularized bovine jugular vein conduit (BJVC) (DP-BJVC) and hand-sewn expanded polytetrafluoroethylene valved conduits (ePTFE VC) are widely employed to reconstruct the RVOT with satisfactory long-term outcomes. However, few studies have compared the safety and efficacy between the two valve conduits. We aimed to evaluate the early outcomes and report our single center experience in the application of these conduits.

Methods

Twenty-two pediatric patients (aged < 18 years) who underwent Ross procedures with DP-BJVC and ePTFE VC in our center between 1 June, 2017 and 31 January, 2022 were enrolled. The Kaplan–Meier method was used to evaluate survival, freedom from RVOT reintervention, and freedom from RVOT graft dysfunction. Mixed-effects analysis with the Geisser–Greenhouse correction and Sidak's multiple comparisons test for post-hoc analysis was employed to compare the peak gradient across the conduit at varying follow-ups.

Results

All patients were followed up in full. The total early survival rate was 90.9%; two patients in the DP-BJVC group died. There was no significant difference in early mortality, cross-clamp time (p = 0.212), in-hospital stay (p = 0.469), and RVOT graft thrombosis or endocarditis between the two groups. There was similarly no significant difference between Kaplan–Meier freedom from RVOT graft dysfunction curve (P = 0.131). The transprosthetic gradient gradually increased over time in both groups and was significantly higher in the DP-BJVC group at follow-up (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Both conduits show excellent early and midterm outcomes for RVOT reconstruction in the Ross procedure. We suggest that DP-BJVC is more suitable for infants, and ePTFE conduit is more suitable for older children who require larger conduits.

Current development of bovine jugular vein conduit for right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction

Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reconstruction is a common surgical method to treat congenital cardiac lesions, and bovine jugular vein conduit (BJVC) has become a prevalent candidate of prosthetic material for this procedure since 1999. Although many clinical studies have shown encouraging results on BJVCs, complications such as stenosis, aneurysmal dilatation, valve insufficiency, and infective endocarditis revealed in other clinical outcomes still remain problematic. This review describes the underlying mechanisms causing respective complications, and summarizes the current technological development that may address those causative factors. Novel crosslinking agents, decellularization techniques, conduit coatings, and physical reinforcement materials have improved the performances of BJVCs. The authors expect that the breakthroughs in the clinical application of BJVC may come from new genetic research findings and advanced characterization apparatuses and bioreactors, and are optimistic that the BJVC will in the future provide sophisticated therapies for next-generation RVOT reconstruction.

Conduits for Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Reconstruction in Infants and Young Children

Purpose of Review: Right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) reconstruction remains a challenge due to the lack of an ideal conduit. Data and experience are accumulating with each passing day. Therefore, it is necessary to review this topic from time to time. This is a 2021 update review focused on the history, evolution, and current situation of small-sized conduits (≤ 16 mm) for RVOT reconstruction in infants and young children.

Recent Findings: Currently, the available small-sized (≤16 mm) conduits can meet most clinical needs. Homograft is still a reliable choice for infants and young children validated by a half-century clinical experience. As an alternative material, bovine jugular vein conduit (BJVC) has at least comparable durability with that of homograft. The performance of expanded polytetrafluoroethylene (ePTFE) is amazing in RVOT position according to limited published data. The past century has witnessed much progress in the materials for RVOT reconstruction. However, lack of growth potential is the dilemma for small-sized conduits. Tissue-engineering based on cell-free scaffolds is the most promising technology to obtain the ideal conduit.

Summary: No conduit has proved to have lifelong durability in RVOT position. We are far from the ideal, but we are not in a state of emergency. In-depth clinical research as well as innovation in material science are needed to help improve the durability of the conduits used in infants and young children.