Risk Factors of Hypersensitivity to Carboplatin in Patients with Gynecologic Malignancies

A Modified Basophil Activation Test for the Clinical Management of Immediate Hypersensitivity Reactions to Paclitaxel: A Proof-of-Concept Study

Immediate hypersensitivity reactions (iHSRs) to taxanes are observed in 6% and 4% of gynecologic and breast cancer patients, respectively. Drug desensitization is the only option, as no comparable alternative therapy is available. Surfactants in the taxane formulation have been implicated in the immunopathogenesis of iHSRs, although sporadic skin test (ST) positivity and iHSRs to nab-paclitaxel have suggested the involvement of the taxane moiety and/or IgE-mediated pathomechanisms. In vitro diagnostic tests might offer insights into mechanisms underlying iHSRs to taxanes. The aim of the present study was to address this unmet need by developing a novel basophil activation test (BAT). The study included patients (n = 31) undergoing paclitaxel/carboplatin therapy. Seventeen patients presented with iHSRs to paclitaxel (iHSR-Taxpos), and eleven were tolerant (iHSR-Taxneg). Fourteen patients presented with iHSRs to carboplatin (iHSR-Plpos), and fourteen were tolerant (iHSR-Plneg). The BAT median stimulation index (SI) values were 1.563 (range, 0.02-4.11; n = 11) and -0.28 (range -4.88-0.07, n = 11) in iHSR-Taxpos and iHSR-Taxneg, respectively. The BAT median SI values were 4.45 (range, 0.1-26.7; n = 14) and 0 (range, -0.51-1.65; n = 12) in iHSR-Plpos and iHSR-Plneg, respectively. SI levels were not associated with iHSR severity grading. Comparing BAT results in iHSR-Taxpos and iHSR-Taxneg showed the area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve to be 0.9752 (p = 0.0002). The cutoff calculated by the maximized likelihood ratio identified 90.91% of iHSR-Taxpos patients and 90.91% of iHSR-Taxneg patients. Comparing BAT results for iHSR-Plpos and iHSR-Plneg showed the area under the ROC curve to be 0.9286 (p = 0.0002). The cutoff calculated by the maximized likelihood ratio identified 78.57% of iHSR-Plpos patients and 91.67% of iHSR-Plneg patients. Most iHSR-Taxpos patients for which ST was available (10/11) scored ST-negative and BAT-positive, whereas most iHSR-Plpos patients for which ST was available (14/14) scored both BAT- and ST-positive. This suggested the intervention of non-IgE-mediated mechanisms in iHSR-Taxpos patients. Consistent with this view, an in silico molecular docking analysis predicted the high affinity of paclitaxel to the degranulation-competent MRGPRX2 receptor. This hypothesis warrants further in vitro investigations. In conclusion, the present study provides preliminary proof-of-concept evidence that this novel BAT has potential utility in understanding mechanisms underlying iHSRs to taxanes.

Anaphylactic reaction to carboplatin diagnosed by skin testing-a reliable tool in platinum-based immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions

Immediate-type hypersensitivity reactions (IHRs) to carboplatin (CA) are most commonly reported in ovarian cancer patients. A 54-year-old woman with stage IV melanoma suffering from metastasis in the entire right lower extremity was presented to our allergy outpatient clinic for diagnostic work-up due to an anaphylactic reaction with palmoplantar erythema, conjunctivitis along with facial erythema, and an incipient decrease in blood pressure during a chemotherapy regimen with dacarbazine and carboplatin upon re-administration. A subsequently carried out allergological work-up with skin testing (ST) revealed CA to be the culprit drug, whereas cisplatin (CI) was confirmed to be a safe alternative for the patient for following treatments. Here, we report a case of an IHR to carboplatin in a melanoma patient, with CI serving as a safe alternative diagnosed by skin testing.

Complete metabolic response after carboplatin desensitization in Peritoneal Carcinomatosis

INTRODUCTION

High-grade serous primary peritoneal cancer is highly sensitive to platinum-based chemotherapy with response rates above 80%. Incidence of immediate hypersensitivity reactions to carboplatin is estimated to be between 15% and 20%, usually seen after a mean of 6-8 infusions, with patients developing moderate to severe reactions.

CASE REPORT

A 62-year-old female patient with stage IIIC primary high-grade serous carcinoma of the peritoneum was diagnosed and chemotherapy with carboplatin and Paclitaxel was indicated by the oncology service and patient shows response. At 6 months the patient returns, a new PET/CT reports progression of the disease. Carboplatin/paclitaxel cycles are restarted and in the eight cycle of carboplatin within 40 min of administration, she presented severe anaphylaxis with skin, pulmonary, cardiac and atypical symptoms. Infusion is suspended and intramuscular epinephrine with hydrocortisone and chlorphenamine are administered resolving symptoms.

MANAGEMENT AND OUTCOME

Intradermal skin test with carboplatin at the concentration of 10 mg / ml (dilution 1: 100) was positive. Due to the symptoms presented and to continue the safe reintroduction to carboplatin, a 4 bag 16-step drug desensitization protocol was carried out at a total dose of 620 mg with no hypersensitivity reactions.

DISCUSSION

Prolonged carboplatin use is associated with an increased incidence of carboplatin-related hypersensitivity reactions. And in patients that present hypersensitivity reactions, a safe and effective carboplatin desensitization protocol can be carried out to reach the administration of a full dose. Desensitization protocol induces tolerance to a drug temporarily and is dependent on continuous exposure.

Risk factors for and prognosis of carboplatin-related hypersensitivity in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

We aimed to identify the predictive risk factors for carboplatin-related hypersensitive reactions (HRs) and investigate their impact on survival outcomes in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC).

METHODS

This retrospective study included 222 patients with EOC who received carboplatin infusion between July 2016 and November 2019. We compared the clinicopathologic characteristics and survival outcomes between carboplatin-related hypersensitivity and non-hypersensitivity groups. Hypersensitivity data were classified using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0, categorizing grades from 1 to 5 as mild/moderate/severe/life-threatening/death. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to analyze risk factors of HRs. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used to determine the factors of being significantly associated with overall survival.

RESULTS

Of the 222 patients, eight exhibited HRs (incidence rate, 3.6%). All HRs were of grade 3 or 4 (life-threatening). In all cases, a desensitization protocol was followed. Advanced stage (III or IV) (P = 0.022), previous history of carboplatin use (P < 0.001), and recurrent ovarian cancer (P = 0.001) were significantly associated with HR to carboplatin. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that a previous history of carboplatin was the only independent risk factor for carboplatin-related hypersensitivity (OR, 20.19; 95% CI 1.22 - 3034.10; P = 0.034). However, HR to carboplatin did not influence the overall survival (P = 0.526).

CONCLUSION

In EOC patients, prior use of carboplatin was an independent risk factor for carboplatin-related HRs; HRs to carboplatin did not influence the overall survival. Clinicians should not underestimate the possibility risk of carboplatin HSRs when re-administrating carboplatin in EOC patients.

Predictive factors for carboplatin hypersensitivity reactions in gynecologic cancers: Effect of BRCA status

Introduction

Carboplatin hypersensitivity reactions have been reported to occur in up to 16% of patients with gynecologic cancers. Several predisposing factors have been suggested including presence of BRCA1/2 mutation, however, contribution of these mutations to reaction development has not been extensively studied. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is an association between BRCA1/2 mutation status and the development of carboplatin hypersensitivity reactions. Methodology: Eligible patients were women aged 18 years or older with a diagnosis of ovarian, fallopian tube, uterine, endometrial, or primary peritoneal cancer who attempted to receive at least one dose of carboplatin. The primary outcome was the effect of BRCA1/2 status on the development of carboplatin hypersensitivity reactions with regard to: reaction frequency, timing, and severity. Secondary outcomes included identification of additional risk factors that may help identify predisposition to carboplatin hypersensitivity reaction.

Results

A total of 44 patients were included in this study. Five patients (38%) in the reaction group and 4 patients (31%) in the no reaction group had a documented mutation in one or both BRCA genes (p = 1.00). No significant differences were found in terms of reaction severity or symptoms, and timing of reaction after dose administration. Incidence of thyroid disorder was significantly higher among patients who experienced a hypersensitivity reaction (1 (4%) vs 10 (45%); p = 0.004).

Conclusion

BRCA mutation status was not associated with an increased risk of carboplatin hypersensitivity in our patient population. Further investigation into thyroid dysfunction as a risk factor for reaction development is warranted.

Recent developments and highlights in drug hypersensitivity

Drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are nowadays the third cause of allergy after rhinitis and asthma with a significant increase in prevalence in both adults and paediatric population with new drugs included as culprit. For this, DHRs represent not only a health problem but also a significant financial burden for affected individuals and health systems. Mislabelling DHRs is showing to be a relevant problem for both, false label of drug allergic and false label of nonallergic. All this reinforces the need to improve accurate diagnostic approaches that allow an appropriate management. Moreover, there is a need for training both, nonallergist stakeholders and patients to improve the reaction identification and therefore decrease the mislabelling. The use of allergy cards has shown to be relevant to avoid the induction of DHRs due to the prescription of wrong medication. Recent developments over the last 2 years and highlights about risk factors, diagnostic approaches, mechanisms involved as well as prevention actions, and management have been reviewed. In these papers, it has been outlined the need for correct diagnosis and de-labelling of patients previously false-reported as allergic, which will improve the management and treatment of patients with DHRs.

Long-term multidisciplinary integrative therapy management resulted in favorable outcomes for ovarian cancer during pregnancy: a case report and literature review

Background

Ovarian cancer during pregnancy is relatively rare and treatment strategies are inexperienced in surgery and chemotherapy. Multidisciplinary management of advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in pregnant patients with strong desire of fertility including sufficient mental and medical understanding, perioperative consideration, intraoperative decision, chemotherapy sensitivity and follow-up after treatment can gain successful outcomes for both maternal disease and fetus’s development.

Case presentation

A 34-year-old primigravidae was diagnosed with advanced epithelial ovarian tumor and then first cytoreductive surgery to resect macroscopical lesions and protect the uterus for fetus was performed following with four chemotherapy courses (docetaxel and carboplatin) before delivery and four other chemotherapy courses after delivery. Chemotherapy drugs were decided by sensitivity test and the patient’s anaphylaxis. Second surgery involved cesarean section with a healthy offspring and secondary cytoreductive surgery. Operative strategies were considered to gain a balance of disease and risk for fetus. Psychosocial support was provided during the course of diagnosis and treatment for a healthy coping situation. This patient relapsed 19 months after the last chemotherapy course and was treated by additional adjuvant therapy to a clinical remission. The 33-month baby boy has no evidence with disease until now. The follow-up of both mother and baby is still continuing.

Conclusions

Ovarian cancer during pregnancy has low incidence which must increase in future as women delay reproduction age. Ovarian cancer cytoreductive surgery and chemotherapy have limitation to handle conditions under a desire of fetus protection. Multidisciplinary treatment model is a therapeutic solution and a challenge for gynecological surgeons, medical oncologists, pathologists, obstetricians, neonatologists, pharmacists, anesthetist, and psychologists.