1
|
Ng QX, Ong C, Chan KE, Ong TSK, Lim IJX, Tang ASP, Chan HW, Koh GCH. Comparative policy analysis of national rare disease funding policies in Australia, Singapore, South Korea, the United Kingdom and the United States: a scoping review. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2024; 14:42. [PMID: 38896399 PMCID: PMC11186122 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-024-00519-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Rare diseases pose immense challenges for healthcare systems due to their low prevalence, associated disabilities, and attendant treatment costs. Advancements in gene therapy, such as treatments for Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA), have introduced novel therapeutic options, but the high costs, exemplified by Zolgensma® at US$2.1 million, present significant financial barriers. This scoping review aimed to compare the funding approaches for rare disease treatments across high-performing health systems in Australia, Singapore, South Korea, the United Kingdom (UK), and the United States (US), aiming to identify best practices and areas for future research. METHODS In accordance with the PRISMA-ScR guidelines and the methodological framework by Arksey and O'Malley and ensuing recommendations, a comprehensive search of electronic databases (Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane) and grey literature from health department websites and leading national organizations dedicated to rare diseases in these countries was conducted. Countries selected for comparison were high-income countries with advanced economies and high-performing health systems: Australia, Singapore, South Korea, the UK, and the US. The inclusion criteria focused on studies detailing drug approval processes, reimbursement decisions and funding mechanisms, and published from 2010 to 2024. RESULTS Based on a thorough review of 18 published papers and grey literature, various strategies are employed by countries to balance budgetary constraints and access to rare disease treatments. Australia utilizes the Life Saving Drugs Program and risk-sharing agreements. Singapore depends on the Rare Disease Fund, which matches public donations. South Korea's National Health Insurance Service covers specific orphan drugs through risk-sharing agreements. The UK relies on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) to evaluate treatments for cost-effectiveness, supported by the Innovative Medicines Fund. In the US, a combination of federal and state programs, private insurance and non-profit support is used. CONCLUSION Outcome-based risk-sharing agreements present a practical solution for managing the financial strain of costly treatments. These agreements tie payment to actual treatment efficacy, thereby distributing financial risk and promoting ongoing data collection. Countries should consider adopting and expanding these agreements to balance immediate expenses with long-term benefits, ultimately ensuring equitable access to crucial treatments for patients afflicted by rare diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qin Xiang Ng
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore.
| | - Clarence Ong
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Kai En Chan
- NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University, Singapore, Singapore
| | | | | | - Ansel Shao Pin Tang
- NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hwei Wuen Chan
- NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University, Singapore, Singapore
- Department of Ophthalmology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Gerald Choon Huat Koh
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
- NUS Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Domaradzki J, Walkowiak D. Invisible patients in rare diseases: parental experiences with the healthcare and social services for children with rare diseases. A mixed method study. Sci Rep 2024; 14:14016. [PMID: 38890437 PMCID: PMC11189503 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-63962-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
This study explores the experiences of Polish caregivers of children with rare disease (CRD) with health care and social services for CRD. A mixed-methods approach was employed, using an open-ended questionnaire with a convenience sample. Quantitative data presented through descriptive statistics, were complemented by thematic analysis applied to qualitative responses. Responses from 925 caregivers of 1002 children with CRD revealed that the duration of the diagnostic journey varied, spanning from 0 to 18 years, with an average time of 1.7 years. Similarly, the average number of physicians consulted before receiving the correct diagnosis was 4.8. The Internet was basic source of information about children's disease. Although caregivers were to some extent satisfied with the quality of health care for CRD, they complained at the accessibility of health care and social services, physicians' ignorance regarding RDs, the lack of co-ordinated care and financial and psychological support. To break the cycle of the diagnostic and therapeutic odyssey that may aggravate the condition of CRD, cause parental stress and financial burden there is a need to change our view on CRD from cure to family-oriented care. Multifaceted challenges and needs of CRD families should be prioritized.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Domaradzki
- Department of Social Sciences and Humanities, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Rokietnicka 7, St., 60-806, Poznan, Poland.
| | - Dariusz Walkowiak
- Department of Organisation and Management in Health Care, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mela A, Lis D, Rdzanek E, Jaroszyński J, Furtak-Niczyporuk M, Drop B, Blicharski T, Niewada M. AOTMiT reimbursement recommendations compared to other HTA agencies. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024:10.1007/s10198-023-01655-x. [PMID: 38261131 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01655-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/24/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
Our objective was to compare AOTMiT (Polish: Agencja Oceny Technologii Medycznych i Taryfikacji) recommendations to other HTA (Health Technology Assessment) agencies for newly registered drugs and new registration indications issued by the European Medicines Agency between 2014 and 2019. The study aims to assess the consistency and justifications of AOTMiT recommendations compared to that of other HTA agencies in 11 countries. A total of 2494 reimbursement recommendations published by 12 HTA agencies for 464 medicinal products and 525 indications were analyzed. Our analysis confirmed that the Polish AOTMiT agency seems to bear the closest resemblance to the corresponding HTA agencies from Canada (CADTH) and New Zealand (PHARMAC), when it comes to the outcome of HTA recommendations (positive or negative). Poland had a general scheme for justifying recommendations, similar to that of Ireland-four aspects (i.e., clinical efficacy, safety profile, cost-effectiveness, and impact on the payer's budget) are important for Poland when formulating the final decision. Compared to other countries, Poland shows a noticeably different pattern of justifying reimbursement recommendations, as revealed primarily in terms of budget impact and somewhat less so for cost-effectiveness rationales.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aneta Mela
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology (CePT), Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1B, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland.
| | - Dorota Lis
- HealthQuest Sp z o.o. Sp. K, 01-625, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Elżbieta Rdzanek
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology (CePT), Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1B, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Janusz Jaroszyński
- Department of Administrative Procedure, Faculty of Law and Administration, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University of Lublin, Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej 5, 20-031, Lublin, Poland
| | | | - Bartłomiej Drop
- Department of Information Technology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Lublin, 20-093, Lublin, Poland
| | - Tomasz Blicharski
- Department of Orthopeadics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Lublin, K. Jaczewskiego 8, 20-090, Lublin, Poland
| | - Maciej Niewada
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology (CePT), Medical University of Warsaw, Banacha 1B, 02-097, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Pijeira Perez Y, Wood E, Hughes DA. Costs of orphan medicinal products: longitudinal analysis of expenditure in Wales. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2023; 18:342. [PMID: 37915031 PMCID: PMC10621215 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-023-02956-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/19/2023] [Indexed: 11/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Orphan Regulation ((EC) No 141/2000) has successfully redirected private and public investment towards previously neglected areas through incentives, regulatory obligations and rewards. However, the growth in the number of licensed orphan medicinal products (OMPs) has led to concerns about increased costs. The aims were to investigate the trend in the costs of OMPs to the National Health Service in Wales, to attribute costs of medicines within and outside periods of marketing exclusivity, and estimate the contribution of individual medicines to the overall costs of OMPs. METHODS Expenditure on OMPs in Wales was analysed between the 2014/15 and 2019/20 financial years using data on prescriptions dispensed in primary care, secondary care, and specialised commissioned services. OMP spend was calculated as a proportion of total medicines expenditure, whether it was incurred during, or outside the marketing exclusivity period (MEP), and by therapeutic area and medicine. RESULTS Overall spend on OMPs and all medicines increased from £32 m to £82 m, and from £1,030 m to £1,198 m, respectively, with the proportion of spend on OMPs more than doubling from 3.1% to 6.9% per annum. Average year-on-year growth in the costs of OMPs was 21%, compared to 2% for other medicines. Costs following MEP expiry contributed significantly to overall OMP costs, increasing from £8 m to £30 m, corresponding to an increase from 24% to 37%. Treatments for 'malignant disease and immunosuppression', 'nutrition and blood' and the 'respiratory system' accounted for 90% of all OMP spend. Half of total OMP annual expenditure was on just 4 medicines in 2014/15, increasing to 8 in 2019/20. CONCLUSIONS Both the number of OMPs and the amount spent on OMPs in Wales has increased over time, possibly as a consequence of favourable licensing conditions, permissive health technology assessment policies and dedicated funding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yankier Pijeira Perez
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Ardudwy, Normal Site, Holyhead Road, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales, LL57 2PZ, UK
| | - Eifiona Wood
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Ardudwy, Normal Site, Holyhead Road, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales, LL57 2PZ, UK
| | - Dyfrig A Hughes
- Centre for Health Economics and Medicines Evaluation, Bangor University, Ardudwy, Normal Site, Holyhead Road, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales, LL57 2PZ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mela A, Rdzanek E, Jaroszyński J, Furtak-Niczyporuk M, Jabłoński M, Niewada M. Reimbursement decision-making system in Poland systematically compared to other countries. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1153680. [PMID: 37900165 PMCID: PMC10611478 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1153680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Our objective was to analyze and compare systematically and structurally reimbursement systems in Poland and other countries. Methods: The systems were selected based on recommendations issued by the Polish Agency for Health Technology Assessment and Tariffication (AHTAPol), which explicitly referred to other countries and agencies). Consequently, apart from Poland, the countries included in the analysis were England, Scotland, Wales, Ireland, France, Netherlands, Germany, Norway, Sweden, Canada, Australia and New Zealand. Relevant information and data were collected through a systematic search of PubMed (Medline), Embase and The Cochrane Library as well as competent authority websites and grey literature sources. Results and discussion: In most of the countries, the submission of a reimbursement application is initiated by a pharmaceutical company, and only a few countries allow it before a product is approved for marketing. All of the agencies analyzed are independent and some have regulatory function of reimbursement decision making body. A key criterion differentiating the various agencies in terms of HTA is the cost-effectiveness threshold. Most of the countries have specific mechanisms to improve access to expensive specialty drugs, including cancer drugs and those used for rare diseases. Reimbursement systems often lack consistency in appreciating the same stages, leading to heterogeneous decision-making processes. The analysis of recommendations issued in different countries for the same medicinal product will allow a better understanding of the relations between the reimbursement system, HTA assessment, stakeholders involvement and decision on reimbursement of innovative drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aneta Mela
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology (CePT), Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Elżbieta Rdzanek
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology (CePT), Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Janusz Jaroszyński
- Department of Administrative Proceedings, Faculty of Law and Administration, Marie Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin, Poland
| | | | - Mirosław Jabłoński
- Department of Orthopeadics and Rehabilitation, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Maciej Niewada
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Pharmacology, Centre for Preclinical Research and Technology (CePT), Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abozaid GM, Kerr K, McKnight A, Al-Omar HA. Criteria to define rare diseases and orphan drugs: a systematic review protocol. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062126. [PMID: 35906057 PMCID: PMC9345065 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Rare diseases (RDs) are often chronic and progressive life-threatening medical conditions that affect a low percentage of the population compared with other diseases. These conditions can be treated with medications known as orphan drugs (ODs). Unfortunately, there is no universal definition of RDs or ODs. This systematic review (SR) will identify the quantitative and qualitative criteria and the underlying rationale used internationally to define RDs and ODs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This protocol follows the conventions for the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols (2015 guidelines). A SR will be conducted, including a search of the following databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, GreyLit and OpenGrey. Eligible publications will be selected based on predetermined inclusion criteria. Extracted data will be analysed using thematic and content analyses of qualitative descriptors, whereas quantitative data will be analysed descriptively and reported in the form of frequencies and percentages. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION No ethical approval is required since this SR focuses on the secondary analysis of data retrieved from the scientific literature. The outcomes of this SR will be published as part of a PhD thesis, presented at conferences, and published in peer-reviewed journals. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42021252701.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghada Mohammed Abozaid
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Institute of Clinical Sciences B, Royal Victoria Hospital, Queen's University Belfast School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences,Centre for Public Health, Belfast, UK
| | - Katie Kerr
- Institute of Clinical Sciences B, Royal Victoria Hospital, Queen's University Belfast School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences,Centre for Public Health, Belfast, UK
| | - Amy McKnight
- Institute of Clinical Sciences B, Royal Victoria Hospital, Queen's University Belfast School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences,Centre for Public Health, Belfast, UK
| | - Hussain A Al-Omar
- Deparment of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Center of Health Technology Assessment, Ministry of Health, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Health Technology Assessment Unit (HTAU), College of Pharmacy, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Blonda A, Denier Y, Huys I, Kawalec P, Simoens S. How Can We Optimize the Value Assessment and Appraisal of Orphan Drugs for Reimbursement Purposes? A Qualitative Interview Study Across European Countries. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:902150. [PMID: 35928274 PMCID: PMC9343828 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.902150] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/22/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The expansion of orphan drug treatment at increasing prices, together with uncertainties regarding their (cost-)effectiveness raises difficulties for decision-makers to assess these drugs for reimbursement. The present qualitative study aims to gain better insight into current value assessment and appraisal frameworks for orphan drugs, and provides guidance for improvement. Methods: 22 European experts from 19 different countries were included in a qualitative survey, followed by in-depth semi-structured interviews. These experts were academics, members of reimbursement agencies or health authorities, or members of regulatory or health/social insurance institutions. Adopting a Grounded Theory approach, transcripts were analysed according to the QUAGOL method, supported by the qualitative data analysis software Nvivo. Results: Although participants indicated several good practices (e.g., the involvement of patients and the presence of structure and consistency), several barriers (e.g., the lack of transparency) lead to questions regarding the efficiency of the overall reimbursement process. In addition, the study identified a number of “contextual” determinants (e.g., bias, perverse effects of the orphan drug legislation, and an inadequate consideration of the opportunity cost), which may undermine the legitimacy of orphan drug reimbursement decisions. Conclusion: The present study provides guidance for decision-makers to improve the efficiency of orphan drug reimbursement. In particular, decision-makers can generate quick wins by limiting the impact of contextual determinants rather than improving the methods included in the HTA. When implemented into a framework that promotes “Accountability for Reasonableness” (A4R), this allows decision-makers to improve the legitimacy of reimbursement decisions concerning future orphan drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Blonda
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- *Correspondence: Alessandra Blonda,
| | - Yvonne Denier
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Pawel Kawalec
- Institute of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stafinski T, Glennie J, Young A, Menon D. HTA decision-making for drugs for rare diseases: comparison of processes across countries. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2022; 17:258. [PMID: 35804398 PMCID: PMC9264608 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-022-02397-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Drugs for rare diseases (DRDs) offer important health benefits, but challenge traditional health technology assessment, reimbursement, and pricing processes due to limited effectiveness evidence. Recently, modified processes to address these challenges while improving patient access have been proposed in Canada. This review examined processes in 12 jurisdictions to develop recommendations for consideration during formal government-led multi-sectoral discussions currently taking place in Canada.
Methods (i) A scoping review of DRD reimbursement processes, (ii) key informant interviews, (iii) a case study of evaluations for and the reimbursement status of a set of 7 DRDs, and (iv) a virtual, multi-stakeholder consultation retreat were conducted. Results Only NHS England has a process specifically for DRDs, while Italy, Scotland, and Australia have modified processes for eligible DRDs. Almost all consider economic evaluations, budget impact analyses, and patient-reported outcomes; but less than half accept surrogate measures. Disease severity, lack of alternatives, therapeutic value, quality of evidence, and value for money are factors used in all decision-making process; only NICE England uses a cost-effectiveness threshold. Budget impact is considered in all jurisdictions except Sweden. In Italy, France, Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom, specific factors are considered for DRDs. However, in all jurisdictions opportunities for clinician/patient input are the same as those for other drugs. Of the 7 DRDs included in the case study, the number that received a positive reimbursement recommendation was highest in Germany and France, followed by Spain and Italy. No relationship between recommendation type and specific elements of the pricing and reimbursement process was found. Conclusions Based on the collective findings from all components of the project, seven recommendations for possible action in Canada are proposed. These focus on defining “appropriate access”, determining when a “full” HTA may not be needed, improving coordination among stakeholder groups, developing a Canadian framework for Managed Access Plans, creating a pan-Canadian DRD/rare disease data infrastructure, genuine and continued engagement of patient groups and clinicians, and further research on different decision and financing options, including MAPs. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13023-022-02397-4.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tania Stafinski
- Health Technology and Policy Unit, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Judith Glennie
- J. L. Glennie Consulting Inc., Knowledge Broker Consultant, PRISM Research Collaborative, Aurora, Canada
| | - Andrea Young
- Health Technology and Policy Unit, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 1C9, Canada
| | - Devidas Menon
- Health Technology and Policy Unit, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, T6G 1C9, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Foltanova T, Majernik A, Malikova E, Kosirova S. Availability and Accessibility of Orphan Medicinal Products to Patients in Slovakia in the Years 2010-2019. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:768325. [PMID: 35153774 PMCID: PMC8826087 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.768325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: Information about the access of Slovak patients to orphan medicinal products (OMPs) in the literature is rather scarce. The main aim of the study was to analyze the accessibility and availability of OMPs to Slovak patients in the years 2010-2019. Methods: The analyzed OMPs were strictly defined according to the European definition. The date of marketing authorization together with its first appearance in the positive drug list was used to count the time to reach the national market. The data from the National Health Information Centre, the Ministry of Health, and health insurance companies were used as data sources of drug usage, expenditure, consumption, reimbursement of OMPs, as well as the total number of treated patients. Results: Out of the 167 OMPs on the European market, we identified 52% (87) OMPs which had any kind of costs recorded in Slovakia. Out of them, 62% (54) OMPs were directly present on the positive drug list. The remaining 33 OMPs were available on exception. The trend in accessibility and availability of OMPs in Slovakia between the years 2010 and 2019 was decreasing (57% OMPs in 2010 vs. 47% OMPs in 2019). The average time for an orphan medicinal product to reach the Slovak market was almost 4 years, 43.5 months [6-202 months]. Together, 10.4% (8 815 patients) out of the theoretical patients' estimation according to the prevalence in the orphan designation were treated with OMPs available in Slovakia. Conclusion: Presented data clearly show insufficient accessibility and availability of OMPs in Slovakia. Importance of clearly defined criteria for OMPs supporting patients and healthcare professionals' involvement in the final decision together with other measures such as social impact, improvement of patients' quality of life, society wide meaning, or no alternative treatment in the final decision is crucial for transparent and sustainable access to OMPs and innovative treatments in Slovakia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatiana Foltanova
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.,Slovak Alliance for Rare Diseases, Pezinok, Slovakia
| | - Alan Majernik
- Slovak Alliance for Rare Diseases, Pezinok, Slovakia
| | - Eva Malikova
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.,State Institute for Drug Control, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Stanislava Kosirova
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Comenius University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Promoting innovation while controlling cost: The UK's approach to health technology assessment. Health Policy 2022; 126:224-233. [DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 01/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
|
11
|
Greiner W, Patel K, Crossman-Barnes CJ, Rye-Andersen TV, Hvid C, Vandebrouck T. High-Expenditure Disease in the EU-28: Does Drug Spend Correspond to Clinical and Economic Burden in Oncology, Autoimmune Disease and Diabetes? PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2021; 5:385-396. [PMID: 33411314 PMCID: PMC8333173 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-020-00253-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/20/2020] [Indexed: 05/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Drug costs are increasing in Europe, and there is a heightened need to reduce pressure on healthcare systems. In 2017, oncology, autoimmune disease, and diabetes featured as the three highest therapy areas for drug spend in the EU-28. However, the absolute 1-year drug spend growth for diabetes did not feature within the ten fastest growing therapy areas. OBJECTIVE This study explores the association between drug spend and disease burden in oncology, autoimmune disease, and diabetes in the EU-28. METHODS Oncology, autoimmune disease and diabetes therapeutic areas were investigated using four methodologies. Historical and forecasted drug spend was analysed using the IQVIA MIDAS® drug sales database. Clinical and economic burden was estimated from targeted literature reviews. Trend analyses compared changes in drug spend with clinical burden using the Global Burden of Disease tool as the epidemiological reference. Cost per quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) from UK health technology assessments were compared to interpret the health economic value. RESULTS Oncology had the highest historical drug spend and growth compared with autoimmune disease and diabetes. Total drug spend and growth in oncology is forecasted to exceed diabetes by twofold. Increasing oncology drug spend historically did not correspond with reductions in mortality and morbidity. Diabetes had the lowest drug spend and greatest QALY/€1000 spent benefit. CONCLUSION This study indicates that drug spend may not correlate to clinical burden across diseases. Future research could stimulate debate on whether more equitable drug funding may improve disease management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wolfgang Greiner
- Department for Health Economics, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
| | | | | | | | - Christian Hvid
- Novo Nordisk Region Europe Pharmaceuticals A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Tom Vandebrouck
- Novo Nordisk Region Europe Pharmaceuticals A/S, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kohlschütter A. Ethical Issues in Care and Treatment of Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinoses (NCL)-A Personal View. Front Neurol 2021; 12:692527. [PMID: 34248829 PMCID: PMC8267169 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2021.692527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The management of Neuronal Ceroid Lipofuscinoses (NCL), a group of genetic neurodegenerative disorders mainly affecting brain and retinas, raises difficult questions for physicians and other professionals in research, pharmaceutical industry, and public health. Ethical problems in medicine cannot be solved by rational deliberation or by following formal rules. Two topics of ethical issues in the field of NCL are presented here. One group relates to the care of individual patients and centers on a life with dementia at a young age. Advanced care planning for the end of life and the use of life-prolonging measures require challenging assumptions in the best interest of a patient. A second group of questions relates to new treatments. Impressive novel putative causal therapies, such as enzyme replacement for CLN2 disease, may be only disease-modifying and carry the risk of changing a deadly disease of short duration into one with prolonged survival and poor quality of life. The wish for better therapeutic interventions in life-limiting diseases has to take such risks, but more experience is needed before definite conclusions can be drawn. The appropriateness of presymptomatic screening for a severe disease, e.g., must be carefully evaluated to avoid the disastrous experience made with the rash start of newborn screening for Krabbe disease. The ethical issues described and commented in the article reflect the personal experience of a pediatrician who has studied clinical and research questions in NCL for four decades. They should alert various professionals to the necessity of taking their own decisions in situations that are caused by rare progressive brain diseases of young persons, as typified by the NCL.
Collapse
|
13
|
Blonda A, Denier Y, Huys I, Simoens S. How to Value Orphan Drugs? A Review of European Value Assessment Frameworks. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:631527. [PMID: 34054519 PMCID: PMC8150002 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.631527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Decision-makers have implemented a variety of value assessment frameworks (VAFs) for orphan drugs in European jurisdictions, which has contributed to variations in access for rare disease patients. This review provides an overview of the strengths and limitations of VAFs for the reimbursement of orphan drugs in Europe, and may serve as a guide for decision-makers. Methods: A narrative literature review was conducted using the databases Pubmed, Scopus and Web of Science. Only publications in English were included. Publications known to the authors were added, as well as conference or research papers, or information published on the website of reimbursement and health technology assessment (HTA) agencies. Additionally, publications were included through snowballing or focused searches. Results: Although a VAF that applies a standard economic evaluation treats both orphan drugs and non-orphan drugs equally, its focus on cost-effectiveness discards the impact of disease rarity on data uncertainty, which influences an accurate estimation of an orphan drug’s health benefit in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs). A VAF that weighs QALYs or applies a variable incremental cost-effectiveness (ICER) threshold, allows the inclusion of value factors beyond the QALY, although their methodologies are flawed. Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) incorporates a flexible set of value factors and involves multiple stakeholders’ perspectives. Nevertheless, its successful implementation relies on decision-makers’ openness toward transparency and a pragmatic approach, while allowing the flexibility for continuous improvement. Conclusion: The frameworks listed above each have multiple strengths and weaknesses. We advocate that decision-makers apply the concept of accountability for reasonableness (A4R) to justify their choice for a specific VAF for orphan drugs and to strive for maximum transparency concerning the decision-making process. Also, in order to manage uncertainty and feasibility of funding, decision-makers may consider using managed-entry agreements rather than implementing a separate VAF for orphan drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandra Blonda
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yvonne Denier
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hoytema van Konijnenburg EMM, Wortmann SB, Koelewijn MJ, Tseng LA, Houben R, Stöckler-Ipsiroglu S, Ferreira CR, van Karnebeek CDM. Treatable inherited metabolic disorders causing intellectual disability: 2021 review and digital app. Orphanet J Rare Dis 2021; 16:170. [PMID: 33845862 PMCID: PMC8042729 DOI: 10.1186/s13023-021-01727-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Treatable ID App was created in 2012 as digital tool to improve early recognition and intervention for treatable inherited metabolic disorders (IMDs) presenting with global developmental delay and intellectual disability (collectively 'treatable IDs'). Our aim is to update the 2012 review on treatable IDs and App to capture the advances made in the identification of new IMDs along with increased pathophysiological insights catalyzing therapeutic development and implementation. METHODS Two independent reviewers queried PubMed, OMIM and Orphanet databases to reassess all previously included disorders and therapies and to identify all reports on Treatable IDs published between 2012 and 2021. These were included if listed in the International Classification of IMDs (ICIMD) and presenting with ID as a major feature, and if published evidence for a therapeutic intervention improving ID primary and/or secondary outcomes is available. Data on clinical symptoms, diagnostic testing, treatment strategies, effects on outcomes, and evidence levels were extracted and evaluated by the reviewers and external experts. The generated knowledge was translated into a diagnostic algorithm and updated version of the App with novel features. RESULTS Our review identified 116 treatable IDs (139 genes), of which 44 newly identified, belonging to 17 ICIMD categories. The most frequent therapeutic interventions were nutritional, pharmacological and vitamin and trace element supplementation. Evidence level varied from 1 to 3 (trials, cohort studies, case-control studies) for 19% and 4-5 (case-report, expert opinion) for 81% of treatments. Reported effects included improvement of clinical deterioration in 62%, neurological manifestations in 47% and development in 37%. CONCLUSION The number of treatable IDs identified by our literature review increased by more than one-third in eight years. Although there has been much attention to gene-based and enzyme replacement therapy, the majority of effective treatments are nutritional, which are relatively affordable, widely available and (often) surprisingly effective. We present a diagnostic algorithm (adjustable to local resources and expertise) and the updated App to facilitate a swift and accurate workup, prioritizing treatable IDs. Our digital tool is freely available as Native and Web App (www.treatable-id.org) with several novel features. Our Treatable ID endeavor contributes to the Treatabolome and International Rare Diseases Research Consortium goals, enabling clinicians to deliver rapid evidence-based interventions to our rare disease patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Saskia B Wortmann
- Department of Pediatrics, Radboud Center for Mitochondrial Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- University Children's Hospital, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
- On Behalf of United for Metabolic Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marina J Koelewijn
- Department of Pediatrics, Radboud Center for Mitochondrial Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Laura A Tseng
- Department of Pediatrics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- On Behalf of United for Metabolic Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Sylvia Stöckler-Ipsiroglu
- Division of Biochemical Diseases, Department of Pediatrics, BC Children's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3V4, Canada
| | - Carlos R Ferreira
- National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Clara D M van Karnebeek
- Department of Pediatrics, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Pediatrics, Radboud Center for Mitochondrial Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
- On Behalf of United for Metabolic Diseases, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Pediatrics - Metabolic Diseases, Amalia Children's Hospital, Geert Grooteplein 10, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 GA, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|