Impact of a Multifaceted Pharmacist-Led Intervention on Antimicrobial Stewardship in a Gastroenterology Ward: A Segmented Regression Analysis

Development of a prediction model for antimicrobial stewardship pharmacy consultations to identify high-risk pediatric patients: a retrospective study across two centers

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial Stewardship Pharmacy Consultation (ASPC) in China has been shown to reduce patients' length of stay (LOS). However, prolonged LOS remains a challenge, resulting in unnecessary psychological and financial burden for patients.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop a prediction model using ASPC parameters to identify high-risk pediatric patients with infectious diseases. These patients received ASPC interventions but still experienced prolonged LOS, which defined their high-risk status.

METHODS

Predictors for the ASPC model were selected using lasso regression, a nomogram was developed using multivariate logistic regression, and internal validation was performed using tenfold cross-validation. The data set consisted of 474 electronic medical records of pediatric patients with infectious diseases from two hospitals. LOS was dichotomized at the median, and patients with LOS greater than the median were considered to have achieved the outcome.

RESULTS

The proportion of outcome events was set at 50% by design. Five independent predictors were identified in the ASPC model: (1) the suggestions from the crucial consultation (OR: 1.74; 95% CI: 1.10 to 2.74), (2) weight (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.00), (3) whether the patient received first aid (OR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.3 to 1.00), (4) the aim of the crucial consultation (OR: 0.15; 95% CI: 0.03 to 0.66), and (5) whether the patient was critically ill (OR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.41). The ASPC model showed good discrimination with a C-statistic of 0.772 (95% CI: 0.748 to 0.797) and good calibration performance with intercept and slope values of 0.00 (95% CI: -0.12 to 0.12) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.82 to 1.04), respectively, under tenfold cross-validation.

CONCLUSIONS

The antimicrobial stewardship pharmacy consultation model has good discrimination and calibration, and effectively identifies patients at risk for prolonged length of stay.

Evaluation of interventions led by pharmacists in antimicrobial stewardship programs in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic literature review

Objective

We performed a systematic literature review to identify and describe pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

Design

Systematic literature review.

Methods

We searched PubMed for studies evaluating pharmacist-led ASP interventions in LMICs from January 1, 2012, to November 4, 2023. We evaluated the article's country of origin, described ASP interventions, and analyzed their reported outcomes.

Results

Twenty-four studies were included; ten were conducted in China, two in India, two in Thailand, five in Africa, three in Latin America, and two in the Middle East. The predominant interventions in the studies were education and training followed by audit and feedback. The outcomes reported included reduction in antimicrobial consumption, cost reduction, shortening of the duration of antimicrobial therapy, and de-escalation.

Conclusions

Our findings reinforce the importance of clinical pharmacists leading interventions related to antimicrobial stewardship in LMCIs and the global importance of investing in Infectious Disease training.

Impacts of pharmacist-led multi-faceted antimicrobial stewardship on antibiotic use and clinical outcomes in urology department of a tertiary hospital in Guangzhou, China: an interrupted time-series study

BACKGROUND

Research on the effectiveness of pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs) in the urology department is limited.

AIM

To evaluate the impact of pharmacist-led multi-faceted ASPs on antibiotic use and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A prescription review of inpatients receiving one or more antibiotics in the urology department of a large teaching hospital in Guangzhou, China, was conducted from April 2019 to March 2023. The pharmacist-led multi-faceted ASP intervention included guideline development, training, medication consultation, review of medical orders, indicator monitoring, and consultation. The primary outcome was antibiotic consumption. The data were analysed using interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis.

FINDINGS

Following the implementation of ASPs, an immediate decrease was observed in total antibiotic consumption, antibiotic use rate, second-generation cephalosporins, third-generation cephalosporins, fluoroquinolones, and WHO Watch category antibiotics. No differences were observed in mortality rate before and after the intervention, and no significant short- or long-term effects were found on length of hospital stay (LOS) using ITS. However, there was a significant short-term effect on average antibiotic cost.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of pharmacist-led multi-faceted ASPs had positive impacts on reducing antimicrobial consumption without increasing LOS, antibiotic cost, or mortality rate.

Barriers, facilitators, perceptions and impact of interventions in implementing antimicrobial stewardship programs in hospitals of low-middle and middle countries: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are pivotal components of the World Health Organization's Global Action Plan to combat antimicrobial resistance (AMR). ASPs advocate rational antibiotic usage to enhance patient-centered outcomes. However, existing evidence on ASPs and their determinants is largely limited to well-equipped hospitals in high-income nations.

OBJECTIVE

This scoping review aimed to examine the current state of hospital-based ASPs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), shedding light on barriers, facilitators, prescribers' perceptions and practices, and the impact of ASP interventions.

DESIGN

Scoping review on ASP.

METHODS

Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, we conducted electronic database searches on PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar, covering ASP articles published between January 2015 and October 2023. Our review focused on four key domains: barriers to ASP implementation, facilitators for establishing ASP, ASP perceptions and practices of prescribers, and the impact of ASP interventions. Three reviewers separately retrieved relevant data from the included citations using EndNote 21.0.

RESULTS

Among the 7016 articles searched, 84 met the inclusion criteria, representing 34 LMICs. Notably, 58% (49/84) of these studies were published after 2020. Barriers to ASP implementation, including human-resources shortage, lack of microbiology laboratory support, absence of leadership, and limited governmental support, were reported by 26% (22/84) of the studies. Facilitators for hospital ASP implementation identified in five publications included the availability of antibiotic guidelines, ASP protocol, dedicated multidisciplinary ASP committee, and prompt laboratory support. The majority of the research (63%, 53/84) explored the impacts of ASP intervention on clinical, microbiological, and economic aspects. Key outcomes included increased antibiotic prescription appropriateness, reduced antimicrobial consumption, shorter hospital stays, decreased mortality rate, and reduced antibiotic therapy cost.

CONCLUSIONS

The published data underscores the imperative need for widespread antimicrobial stewardship in LMIC hospital settings. Substantial ASP success can be achieved through increasing human resources, context-specific interventions, the development of accessible antibiotic usage guidelines, and heightened awareness via training and education.

The Role of Clinical Pharmacists in Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASPs): A Systematic Review

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a major global health threat, increasing deaths and healthcare costs. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) have been implemented to optimize antibiotic use and curb resistance. This systematic review aimed to summarize evidence on the role and impact of pharmacists in hospital ASPs. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across databases to identify relevant studies published from 2016 to 2023. Twenty-four studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising global observational and randomized clinical trials. Pharmacists performed various stewardship activities, including prospective audits, formulary management, de-escalation, guideline development, and education. Pharmacist-led interventions significantly improved antibiotic prescribing, reduced unnecessary antibiotic use, optimized therapy, and enhanced outcomes. Multiple studies found that pharmacist reviews decreased the time to optimal antibiotics and improved guideline compliance without affecting readmissions or revisits. De-escalation programs safely reduced antibiotic duration and length of stay. Acceptance rates for recommendations were high. Pharmacist stewardship curbed overall antibiotic use, costs, and duration across hospital departments, leading to savings. While most studies showed positive impacts, fewer detected significant changes in resistance or mortality over short periods. More research is needed, but current evidence demonstrates that pharmacists play critical roles in ASPs, leading to improved antibiotic use and patient outcomes. These findings support integrating pharmacists into stewardship activities, significantly extending programs to ambulatory settings.

Implementation of the national antimicrobial stewardship competencies for UK undergraduate healthcare professional education within undergraduate pharmacy programmes: a survey of UK schools of pharmacy

BACKGROUND

Pharmacists play a key role in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS). Consensus-based national AMS competencies for undergraduate healthcare professionals in the UK reflect the increasing emphasis on competency-based healthcare professional education. However, the extent to which these are included within undergraduate pharmacy education programmes in the UK is unknown.

OBJECTIVES

To explore which of the AMS competencies are delivered, including when and at which level, within UK undergraduate MPharm programmes.

METHODS

A cross-sectional online questionnaire captured the level of study of the MPharm programme in which each competency was taught, the method of delivery and assessment of AMS education, and examples of student feedback.

RESULTS

Ten institutions completed the survey (33% response rate). No institution reported covering all 54 AMS competencies and 5 of these were taught at half or fewer of the institutions. Key gaps were identified around taking samples, communication, outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy and surgical prophylaxis. The minimum time dedicated to AMS teaching differed between institutions (range 9-119 h), teaching was generally through didactic methods, and assessment was generally through knowledge recall and objective structured clinical examinations. Feedback from students suggests they find AMS and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) to be complex yet important topics.

CONCLUSIONS

UK schools of pharmacy should utilize the competency framework to identify gaps in their AMS, AMR and infection teaching. To prepare newly qualified pharmacists to be effective at delivering AMS and prescribing antimicrobials, schools of pharmacy should utilize more simulated environments and clinical placements for education and assessment of AMS.

Moderating effects of humanistic care and socioeconomic status on the relationship among pain intensity, psychological factors, and psychological function in adults with cancer pain from a province of China: A cross-sectional study

Objective

The objective of this study is to explore whether humanistic care practiced by clinical pharmacists and socioeconomic status moderate the associations among pain intensity, psychological factors (catastrophizing and resilience), and psychological function (depression and anxiety) in cancer patients with low levels of education and income in the Shanxi province in the Northwest of China.

Methods

Our sample comprised 123 adult inpatients with cancer pain. Demographic variables were obtained from the Hospital Information System of The Second Hospital of Shanxi Medical University. Pain intensity, psychological factors, and psychological functions were evaluated with four scales, and humanistic care was practiced with a part of the patients by clinical pharmacists. First, univariate analyses were conducted, followed by moderating effect models.

Results

The incidence of depression and anxiety in patients with cancer pain in our sample were 48.78 and 41.46%, respectively. Low levels of psychological resilience (63.37, SD 21.74) were in this study. Pain intensity was significantly associated with humanistic care and anxiety. Humanistic care practiced by clinical pharmacists moderated not only the association between resilience and pain intensity but also the association between pain intensity and anxiety. Education levels moderated the relationship between pain intensity and the psychological factors of catastrophizing and resilience. Income levels moderated the association between resilience and anxiety.

Conclusion

Humanistic care is essential in moderating the association among pain intensity, psychological factors, and psychological functions in Chinese cancer patients, especially those from lower-level counties and rural areas. Furthermore, socioeconomic statuses, such as education level and income, cannot easily change quickly. Still, proper humanistic care can relieve pain more effectively, reminding us that medical staff should implement effective personalized interventions to reduce patients' pain intensity.

The role of the clinical pharmacist in antimicrobial stewardship in Asia: A review

Clinical pharmacist-driven antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) have been successfully implemented. Although relevant guidance and several studies suggest that clinical pharmacists be integrated into the current ASP team model, barriers still exist in Asia, primarily due to lack of dedicated personnel and lack of career advancement. We review the effectiveness and the ideal role of clinical pharmacist among ASPs in Asia. Several studies conducted in Asia have shown the effectiveness of pharmacist-led ASP interventions in hospitals and other healthcare settings. However, opportunities to expand the role of clinical pharmacists in ASPs in Asia exist in the implementation of rapid diagnostic test and drug allergies.

The impact of pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship program on antibiotic use in a county-level tertiary general hospital in China: A retrospective study using difference-in-differences design

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate use of antibiotics has become a major driver for the spread of antimicrobial resistance globally, particularly common in China. Antimicrobial stewardship programs are effective in optimizing antimicrobial use and decreasing the emergence of multi-drug-resistant organisms, and the pharmacist has performed a leading role in this program.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs driven by pharmacists on antibiotic consumption and costs and the appropriateness of antibiotic use.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective quasi-experimental design was conducted in two independent hepatobiliary surgery wards and two independent respiratory wards in a county-level tertiary general hospital in Jiangsu, China. Each intervention group was served with antimicrobial stewardship programs with prescriptions audit and feedback, antibiotics restriction, education, and training. The propensity score matching method was employed to balance confounding variables between the intervention group and control group, and a difference-in-differences analysis was used to evaluate the impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs. The primary outcome was measured by scores of rationality evaluation of antibiotics.

RESULTS

The DID results demonstrated that the implementation of the antimicrobial stewardship programs was associated with a reduction in the average length of hospital stay (coefficient = -3.234, p = 0.006), DDDs per patient (coefficient = -2.352, p = 0.047), and hospitalization costs (coefficient = -7745.818, p = 0.005) in the hepatobiliary surgery ward, while it was associated with a decrease in DDDs per patient (coefficient = -3.948, p = 0.029), defined daily doses per patient day (coefficient = -0.215, p = 0.048), and antibiotic costs (coefficient = -935.087, p = 0.014) in the respiratory ward. The program was also associated with a decrease in rationality evaluation scores (p < 0.001) in two wards.

CONCLUSION

The result reveals that the implementation of the antimicrobial stewardship programs is effective in reducing the length of hospital stay, decreasing antibiotics consumption and costs, and improving the appropriateness of antimicrobial use such as decreasing irrational use of cephalosporins, reducing combinations, and improving timely conversion. However, great attention ought to be paid to the improper use of broad-spectrum antibiotics. The government is responsible for providing sustainable formal education for pharmacists, and more funding and staff support to promote antimicrobial stewardship programs.

Exploring Antimicrobial Stewardship Influential Interventions on Improving Antibiotic Utilization in Outpatient and Inpatient Settings: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Antimicrobial stewardship interventions are targeted efforts by healthcare organizations to optimize antimicrobial use in clinical practice. The study aimed to explore effective interventions in improving antimicrobial use in hospitals. Literature was systemically searched for interventional studies through PubMed, CINAHL, and Scopus databases that were published in the period between January 2010 to April 2022. A random-effects model was used to pool and evaluate data from eligible studies that reported antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) interventions in outpatient and inpatient settings. Pooled estimates presented as proportions and standardized mean differences. Forty-eight articles were included in this review: 32 in inpatient and 16 in outpatient settings. Seventeen interventions have been identified, and eight outcomes have been targeted. AMS interventions improved clinical, microbiological, and cost outcomes in most studies. When comparing non-intervention with intervention groups using meta-analysis, there was an insignificant reduction in length of stay (MD: -0.99; 95% CI: -2.38, 0.39) and a significant reduction in antibiotics' days of therapy (MD: -2.73; 95% CI: -3.92, -1.54). There were noticeable reductions in readmissions, mortality rates, and antibiotic prescriptions post antimicrobial stewardship multi-disciplinary team (AMS-MDT) interventions. Studies that involved a pharmacist as part of the AMS-MDT showed more significant improvement in measured outcomes than the studies that did not involve a pharmacist.

Hospital-Based Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs Used in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review

The burden of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is considerable in many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), and it is important to describe the antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) activities found in these countries and report their impact. Importantly, as these programs target prescribing behavior, the factors influencing prescription of antimicrobials must also be taken into account. This scoping review aimed to (1) describe hospital-based ASP activities, (2) report methods used to measure the impact of ASPs, and (3) explore factors influencing antimicrobial prescribing behavior in LMICs. PubMed was searched from database inception until April 2021. Factors influencing antimicrobial prescribing behavior were canvassed using the Capability-Opportunity-Motivation and Behavior framework. Most of ASP studies in LMICs were predominantly conducted in tertiary care and university-based hospitals. Audit of antimicrobial prescriptions with feedback and restrictive-based strategies was the main reported activity. Total antimicrobial consumption was the main method used to measure the impact of ASPs. Positive outcomes were observed for both clinical and microbiological outcomes; however, these were measured from nonrandomized controlled trials. Dominant factors identified through the behavioral framework were a limited awareness of AMR as a local problem, a perception that overprescription of antimicrobials had limited consequences and was mainly driven by a motivation to help improve patient outcomes. In addition, antimicrobial prescribing practices were largely influenced by existing hierarchy among prescribers. Our scoping review suggests that LMICs need to evaluate antimicrobial appropriateness as an added measure to assess impact. Furthermore, improvements in the access of microbiology and diagnostic facilities and ensuring ASP champions are recruited from senior prescribers will positively influence antimicrobial prescribing behavior, helping improve stewardship of antimicrobials in these countries.

The Impact of a Multifaceted Pharmacist-Led Antimicrobial Stewardship Program on Antibiotic Use: Evidence From a Quasi-Experimental Study in the Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology in a Chinese Tertiary Hospital

Objective: The objective of the study was to assess the impact of multifaceted clinical pharmacist-led antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program on the rational use of antibiotics for patients who receive vascular and interventional radiology therapies. Methods: A quasi-experimental retrospective intervention design with a comparison group was applied to the practice of antibiotic use in the department of vascular and interventional radiology in a Chinese tertiary hospital. We used difference-in-differences (DID) analysis to compare outcomes before and after the AMS intervention between the intervention group and control group, to determine whether intervention would lead to changes in irrationality of antibiotic prescribing, antibiotic utilization, cost of antibiotics, and length of hospital stay. Results: The DID results showed that the intervention group was associated with a reduction in the average consumption of antibiotics (p = 0.017) and cost of antibiotics (p = 0.006) and cost per defined daily dose (DDD) (p = 0.000). There were no significant differences in the mean change of total costs and length of stay between the two groups (p > 0.05). The average inappropriate score of perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in the intervention group declined by 0.23, while it decreased by 0.02 in the control group [0.21 (95% CI, -0.271 to -0.143); p = 0.000]. The average inappropriate score of non-surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in the intervention group declined by 0.14, while it increased by 0.02 in the control group [0.16 (95% CI, -0.288 to -0.035); p = 0.010]. The average inappropriate score of the therapeutic use of antibiotics in the intervention group declined by 0.07, while it decreased by 0.01 in the control group [0.06 (95% CI, -0.115 to -0.022); p = 0.003]. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that implementation of AMS interventions was associated with a marked reduction of antibiotic use, cost of antibiotics, and irrationality of antibiotic prescribing in China.

An overview of the hospitals’ antimicrobial stewardship programs implemented to improve antibiotics’ utilization, cost and resistance patterns

Introduction: The high reliance of the physicians and surgeons on the antibiotics since their discovery has led to an irrational antibiotic utilization which not only has raised the incidence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) but also increased the cost of treatment with antibiotics as high use of antibiotics has been found related to the occurrence of certain nosocomial infections which need extra antibiotic courses to be cured. In order to overcome these antibiotic utilization related problems an antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) program being the set of various persuasive, restrictive and structural interventions is considered an effective tool to rationalize the in-patient antimicrobial utilization worldwide. Method: The focus of this review is on the interventions that are being implemented during the in-patient AMS programs and have been described effective in controlling the antibiotic utilization, their cost of treatment and an overall infection control. The literature containing the information about various AMS interventions effecting the utilization and cost patterns along with the impact on AMR was searched in various databases such as PubMed, Google Scholar, Science Direct, Ovid (Medline) and Scopus. The categorical sorting of the published data is based on various AMS interventions such as the guideline development, formulary restriction (pre-authorization), educative interventions, clinical pathway development and prospective (post prescription) audit. Considering the objectives of the study such as the goal to curb overutilization of antibiotics, control of their cost of treatment for in-patients and infection control the sorted literature is presented in three different tables describing the AMS impact on the said outcomes. Results: The post AMS changes in utilization patterns are described as fall of antibiotics defined daily doses (DDD) and days of therapy (DOT) which resulted in the reduction of the cost of treatment with antibiotics. The reduction of the cost of treatment with antibiotics also resulted due to the AMS impact on the control of various nosocomial and multi-drug resistant (MDR) infections. Conclusion:  It has been concluded that the AMS program if implemented under the supervision of an expert AMS team mainly comprising of an infectious disease (ID) physician, clinical pharmacists and microbiologists with considerable support by the hospital authorities could be a highly efficient tool of the pharmacovigilance for rationalizing the in-patient antimicrobial practice.

Impact of pharmacist-led services on antimicrobial stewardship programs: a meta-analysis on clinical outcomes

Purpose

This meta-analysis aims to find out the impact of pharmacists on clinical outcomes of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS).

Method

Articles were searched and analyzed based on quality assessed through the JSM quality assessment tool to filter articles with a low level of bias. Two thousand three hundred sixty articles were reviewed for initial screening and 28 articles were included for critical analysis. Statistical analysis used to risk ratio (RR) and standard mean differences calculated using Review manager 5.4. Confidence intervals (CI 95%) were calculated using the fixed-effect model. The I2 statistic assessed heterogeneity. A random-effect model performed in the case of statistical heterogeneity, subgroup and sensitivity analyses. The primary outcome is mortality and inappropriateness, whereas the secondary outcome is cost, readmission, length of stay, consumption and duration of therapy.

Result

A detailed review and analysis of 28 AMSs programs led by pharmacists showed low inappropriateness with pharmacist versus without pharmacist RR = 0.36 with 95% CI of (0.32 to 0.39) and mortality RR is 0.68 with 95% CI of 0.59 to 0.79. Secondary outcomes such as consumption, length of stay, duration of therapy and cost are standard mean difference of −1.61 with 95% CI (−1.72 to −1.50), −0.58 with 95% CI (−0.62 to −0.53), −0.95 with 95% CI (−1.01 to −0.89) and −0.99 with 95% CI (−1.12 to −0.86), respectively, whereas for 30 days readmission is RR = 0.81 with 95% CI (0.70 to 0.93).

Conclusion

AMS with pharmacist effectively reduces mortality, inappropriateness, cost, length of stay, duration of treatment, consumption of antimicrobials and the return rate to hospital. So it is suggested pharmacists should lead or play a vital role in antimicrobial stewardship programs to get better outcomes.