1
|
Karsan N, Edvinsson L, Vecsei L, Goadsby PJ. Pituitary cyclase-activating polypeptide targeted treatments for the treatment of primary headache disorders. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2024; 11:1654-1668. [PMID: 38887982 PMCID: PMC11251486 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.52119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2024] [Accepted: 05/23/2024] [Indexed: 06/20/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Migraine is a complex and disabling neurological disorder. Recent years have witnessed the development and emergence of novel treatments for the condition, namely those targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). However, there remains a substantial need for further treatments for those unresponsive to current therapies. Targeting pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) as a possible therapeutic strategy in the primary headache disorders has gained interest over recent years. METHODS This review will summarize what we know about PACAP to date: its expression, receptors, roles in migraine and cluster headache biology, insights gained from preclinical and clinical models of migraine, and therapeutic scope. RESULTS PACAP shares homology with vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) and is one of several vasoactive neuropeptides along with CGRP and VIP, which has been implicated in migraine neurobiology. PACAP is widely expressed in areas of interest in migraine pathophysiology, such as the thalamus, trigeminal nucleus caudalis, and sphenopalatine ganglion. Preclinical evidence suggests a role for PACAP in trigeminovascular sensitization, while clinical evidence shows ictal release of PACAP in migraine and intravenous infusion of PACAP triggering attacks in susceptible individuals. PACAP leads to dural vasodilatation and secondary central phenomena via its binding to different G-protein-coupled receptors, and intracellular downstream effects through cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) and phosphokinase C (PKC). Targeting PACAP as a therapeutic strategy in headache has been explored using monoclonal antibodies developed against PACAP and against the PAC1 receptor, with initial positive results. INTERPRETATION Future clinical trials hold considerable promise for a new therapeutic approach using PACAP-targeted therapies in both migraine and cluster headache.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazia Karsan
- Headache Group, The Wolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre (SPaRC), NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility and SLaM Biomedical Research CentreInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College LondonLondonUK
| | - Lars Edvinsson
- Department of Medicine, Institute of Clinical SciencesLund University221 84LundSweden
| | - Laszlo Vecsei
- Department of Neurology, Albert Szent‐Györgyi Medical School, and HUN‐REN‐SZTE Neuroscience Research Group, Hungarian Research NetworkUniversity of SzegedSemmelweis u. 6SzegedH‐6725Hungary
| | - Peter J Goadsby
- Headache Group, The Wolfson Sensory, Pain and Regeneration Centre (SPaRC), NIHR King's Clinical Research Facility and SLaM Biomedical Research CentreInstitute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College LondonLondonUK
- Department of NeurologyUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chiang CC, Porreca F, Robertson CE, Dodick DW. Potential treatment targets for migraine: emerging options and future prospects. Lancet Neurol 2024; 23:313-324. [PMID: 38365382 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(24)00003-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024]
Abstract
Migraine is a leading cause of disability worldwide. Despite the recent approval of several calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeted therapies, many people with migraine do not achieve satisfactory headache improvement with currently available therapies and there continues to be an unmet need for effective and tolerable migraine-specific treatments. Exploring additional targets that have compelling evidence for their involvement in modulating migraine pathways is therefore imperative. Potential new therapies for migraine include pathways involved in nociception, regulation of homoeostasis, modulation of vasodilation, and reward circuits. Animal and human studies show that these targets are expressed in regions of the CNS and peripheral nervous system that are involved in pain processing, indicating that these targets might be regarded as promising for the discovery of new migraine therapies. Future studies will require assessment of whether targets are suitable for therapeutic modulation, including assessment of specificity, affinity, solubility, stability, efficacy, and safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Frank Porreca
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | | | - David W Dodick
- Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA; Atria Academy of Science and Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
de Vries T, Rubio-Beltrán E, van den Bogaerdt A, Dammers R, Danser AHJ, Snellman J, Bussiere J, MaassenVanDenBrink A. Pharmacology of erenumab in human isolated coronary and meningeal arteries: Additional effect of gepants on top of a maximum effect of erenumab. Br J Pharmacol 2024. [PMID: 38320397 DOI: 10.1111/bph.16322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Multiple drugs targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor have been developed for migraine treatment. Here, the effect of the monoclonal antibody erenumab on CGRP-induced vasorelaxation was investigated in human isolated blood vessels, as well as the effect of combining erenumab with the small molecule drugs, namely rimegepant, olcegepant, or sumatriptan. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH Concentration-response curves to CGRP, adrenomedullin or pramlintide were constructed in human coronary artery (HCA) and human middle meningeal artery (HMMA) segments, incubated with or without erenumab and/or olcegepant. pA2 or pKb values were calculated to determine the potency of erenumab in both tissues. To study whether acutely acting antimigraine drugs exerted additional CGRP-blocking effects on top of erenumab, HCA segments were incubated with a maximally effective concentration of erenumab (3 μM), precontracted with KCl and exposed to CGRP, followed by rimegepant, olcegepant, or sumatriptan in increasing concentrations. KEY RESULTS Erenumab shifted the concentration-response curve to CGRP in both vascular tissues. However, in HCA, the Schild plot slope was significantly smaller than unity, whereas this was not the case in HMMA, indicating different CGRP receptor mechanisms in these tissues. In HCA, rimegepant, olcegepant and sumatriptan exerted additional effects on CGRP on top of a maximal effect of erenumab. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS Gepants have additional effects on top of erenumab for CGRP-induced relaxation and could be effective in treating migraine attacks in patients already using erenumab as prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa de Vries
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Eloísa Rubio-Beltrán
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ruben Dammers
- Department of Neurosurgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| | - A H Jan Danser
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Domitrz I. Clinical guidance for choosing the right pharmacotherapy for migraine attacks. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2024; 25:37-44. [PMID: 38189111 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2024.2303425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Migraine as headache attacks with autonomic symptoms is a serious condition and it is important to treat a single attack effectively in order to improve not only the patient's quality of life at a given moment but also to prevent the migraine from becoming a chronic one. AREA COVERED The article briefly presents the guidance in selecting the most appropriate pharmacological treatment of migraine attack, indicating a personalized approach to migraine patient. EXPERT OPINION In this short paper, we show the implementation of new drugs into everyday clinical practice. Good cooperation between the physician and the patient and having the patient's trust is one of the elements of a personalized therapeutic approach and the key to achieving satisfaction of both the patient and the doctor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izabela Domitrz
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, Medical University of Warsaw, Bielanski Hospital, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Garelja ML, Alexander TI, Bennie A, Nimick M, Petersen J, Walker CS, Hay DL. Pharmacological characterisation of erenumab, Aimovig, at two calcitonin gene-related peptide responsive receptors. Br J Pharmacol 2024; 181:142-161. [PMID: 37580864 PMCID: PMC10840612 DOI: 10.1111/bph.16218] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is involved in migraine pathophysiology. CGRP can signal through two receptors. The canonical CGRP receptor comprises the calcitonin receptor-like receptor and receptor activity-modifying protein 1 (RAMP1); the AMY1 receptor comprises the calcitonin receptor with RAMP1. Drugs that reduce CGRP activity, such as receptor antagonists, are approved for the treatment and prevention of migraine. Despite being designed to target the canonical CGRP receptor, emerging evidence suggests that these antagonists, including erenumab (a monoclonal antibody antagonist) can also antagonise the AMY1 receptor. However, it is difficult to estimate its selectivity because direct comparisons between receptors under matched conditions have not been made. We therefore characterised erenumab at both CGRP-responsive receptors with multiple ligands, including αCGRP and βCGRP. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH Erenumab antagonism was quantified through IC50 and pKB experiments, measuring cAMP production. We used SK-N-MC cells which endogenously express the human CGRP receptor, and HEK293S and Cos7 cells transiently transfected to express either human CGRP or AMY1 receptors. KEY RESULTS Erenumab antagonised both the CGRP and AMY1 receptors with an ~20-120-fold preference for the CGRP receptor, depending on the cells, agonist, analytical approach and/or assay format. Erenumab antagonised both forms of CGRP equally, and appeared to act as a competitive reversible antagonist at both receptors. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS Despite being designed to target the CGRP receptor, erenumab can antagonise the AMY1 receptor. Its ability to antagonise CGRP activity at both receptors may be useful in better understanding the clinical profile of erenumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L. Garelja
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand
- Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
| | - Tyla I. Alexander
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand
- Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
| | - Amy Bennie
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand
| | - Mhairi Nimick
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand
| | - Jakeb Petersen
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
| | - Christopher S. Walker
- Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
| | - Debbie L. Hay
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand
- Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Waliszewska-Prosół M, Vuralli D, Martelletti P. What to do with non-responders to CGRP(r) monoclonal antibodies: switch to another or move to gepants? J Headache Pain 2023; 24:163. [PMID: 38053061 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01698-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Indexed: 12/07/2023] Open
Abstract
In this editorial we aim to provide potential therapeutic options in patients who do not benefit from treatment with CGRP(r) monoclonal antibodies. Based on current real-life studies and analysis of practical and economic aspects, we will analyze the potential benefits of changing CGRP-targeted treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Doga Vuralli
- Department of Neurology and Algology, Neuroscience and Neurotechnology Center of Excellence (NÖROM), Faculty of Medicine, Neuropsychiatry Center, Gazi University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- School of Health Sciences, UnitelmaSapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rees TA, Labastida-Ramírez A, Rubio-Beltrán E. Calcitonin/PAC 1 receptor splice variants: a blind spot in migraine research. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2023; 44:651-663. [PMID: 37543479 PMCID: PMC10529278 DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2023.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 07/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/08/2023] [Indexed: 08/07/2023]
Abstract
The neuropeptides calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and their receptors are linked to migraine neurobiology. Recent antimigraine therapeutics targeting the signaling of these neuropeptides are effective; however, some patients respond suboptimally, indicating an incomplete understanding of migraine pathophysiology. The CGRP- and PACAP-responsive receptors can be differentially spliced. It is known that receptor splice variants can have different pathophysiological effects in other receptor-mediated pain pathways. Despite considerable knowledge on the structural and pharmacological differences of the CGRP- and PACAP-responsive receptor splice variants and their expression in migraine-relevant tissues, their role in migraine is rarely considered. Here we shine a spotlight on the calcitonin and PACAP (PAC1) receptor splice variants and examine what implications they may have for drug activity and design.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tayla A Rees
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand; Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.
| | - Alejandro Labastida-Ramírez
- Headache Group, Wolfson Center for Age Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Eloisa Rubio-Beltrán
- Headache Group, Wolfson Center for Age Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Labastida-Ramírez A, Caronna E, Gollion C, Stanyer E, Dapkute A, Braniste D, Naghshineh H, Meksa L, Chkhitunidze N, Gudadze T, Pozo-Rosich P, Burstein R, Hoffmann J. Mode and site of action of therapies targeting CGRP signaling. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:125. [PMID: 37691118 PMCID: PMC10494408 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01644-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Targeting CGRP has proved to be efficacious, tolerable, and safe to treat migraine; however, many patients with migraine do not benefit from drugs that antagonize the CGRPergic system. Therefore, this review focuses on summarizing the general pharmacology of the different types of treatments currently available, which target directly or indirectly the CGRP receptor or its ligand. Moreover, the latest evidence regarding the selectivity and site of action of CGRP small molecule antagonists (gepants) and monoclonal antibodies is critically discussed. Finally, the reasons behind non-responders to anti-CGRP drugs and rationale for combining and/or switching between these therapies are addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandro Labastida-Ramírez
- Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK
| | - Edoardo Caronna
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Universitary Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Cédric Gollion
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Emily Stanyer
- Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK
- Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Sleep and Circadian Neuroscience Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | - Diana Braniste
- Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Diomid Gherman, Chișinău, Moldova
- State University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Nicolae Testemițanu, Moldova
| | - Hoda Naghshineh
- Headache Department, Iranian Center of Neurological Research, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
| | - Liga Meksa
- Headache Unit, Neurology and Neurosurgery Department, Riga East University Hospital Gailezers, Riga, Latvia
| | | | - Tamari Gudadze
- Department of Neurology, Christian Hospital Unna, Unna, Germany
| | - Patricia Pozo-Rosich
- Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Vall d'Hebron Universitary Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
- Headache Research Group, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Rami Burstein
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Center for Life Science, Room 649, 3 Blackfan Circle, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Jan Hoffmann
- Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, SE1 1UL, UK.
- NIHR-Wellcome Trust King's Clinical Research Facility/SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
de Vries T, Boucherie DM, van den Bogaerdt A, Danser AHJ, MaassenVanDenBrink A. Blocking the CGRP Receptor: Differences across Human Vascular Beds. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2023; 16:1075. [PMID: 37630989 PMCID: PMC10459004 DOI: 10.3390/ph16081075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Multiple drugs targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor have been developed for the treatment of migraine. Here, the effect of the small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonist zavegepant (0.1 nM-1 µM) on CGRP-induced relaxation in isolated human coronary arteries (HCAs) was investigated. A Schild plot was constructed and a pA2 value was calculated to determine the potency of zavegepant. The potency and Schild plot slopes of atogepant, olcegepant, rimegepant, telcagepant, ubrogepant and zavegepant in HCAs and human middle meningeal arteries (HMMAs), obtained from our earlier studies, were compared. Zavegepant shifted the concentration-response curve to CGRP in HCAs. The corresponding Schild plot slope was not different from unity, resulting in a pA2 value of 9.92 ± 0.24. No potency difference between HCAs and HMMAs was observed. Interestingly, olcegepant, atogepant and rimegepant, with a Schild plot slope < 1 in HCAs, were all >1 log unit more potent in HMMAs than in HCAs, while telcagepant, ubrogepant and zavegepant, with a Schild plot slope not different from unity, showed similar (<1 log difference) potency across both tissues. As a Schild plot slope < 1 may point to the involvement of multiple receptors, it is important to further identify the receptors involved in the relaxation to CGRP in HCAs, which may be used to improve the cardiovascular safety of future antimigraine drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa de Vries
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (T.d.V.)
| | - Deirdre M. Boucherie
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (T.d.V.)
| | | | - A. H. Jan Danser
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (T.d.V.)
| | - Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink
- Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (T.d.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Al-Hassany L, Boucherie DM, Creeney H, van Drie RWA, Farham F, Favaretto S, Gollion C, Grangeon L, Lyons H, Marschollek K, Onan D, Pensato U, Stanyer E, Waliszewska-Prosół M, Wiels W, Chen HZ, Amin FM. Future targets for migraine treatment beyond CGRP. J Headache Pain 2023; 24:76. [PMID: 37370051 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-023-01567-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Migraine is a disabling and chronic neurovascular headache disorder. Trigeminal vascular activation and release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of migraine. This knowledge has led to the development of CGRP(-receptor) therapies. Yet, a substantial proportion of patients do not respond to these treatments. Therefore, alternative targets for future therapies are warranted. The current narrative review provides a comprehensive overview of the pathophysiological role of these possible non-CGRP targets in migraine. FINDINGS We covered targets of the metabotropic receptors (pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP), vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP), amylin, and adrenomedullin), intracellular targets (nitric oxide (NO), phosphodiesterase-3 (PDE3) and -5 (PDE5)), and ion channels (potassium, calcium, transient receptor potential (TRP), and acid-sensing ion channels (ASIC)). The majority of non-CGRP targets were able to induce migraine-like attacks, except for (i) calcium channels, as it is not yet possible to directly target channels to elucidate their precise involvement in migraine; (ii) TRP channels, activation of which can induce non-migraine headache; and (iii) ASICs, as their potential in inducing migraine attacks has not been investigated thus far. Drugs that target its receptors exist for PACAP, NO, and the potassium, TRP, and ASIC channels. No selective drugs exist for the other targets, however, some existing (migraine) treatments appear to indirectly antagonize responses to amylin, adrenomedullin, and calcium channels. Drugs against PACAP, NO, potassium channels, TRP channels, and only a PAC1 antibody have been tested for migraine treatment, albeit with ambiguous results. CONCLUSION While current research on these non-CGRP drug targets has not yet led to the development of efficacious therapies, human provocation studies using these targets have provided valuable insight into underlying mechanisms of migraine headaches and auras. Further studies are needed on these alternative therapies in non-responders of CGRP(-receptor) targeted therapies with the ultimate aim to pave the way towards a headache-free future for all migraine patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Al-Hassany
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Deirdre M Boucherie
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hannah Creeney
- Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Ruben W A van Drie
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Division of Experimental Cardiology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Fatemeh Farham
- Department of Headache, Iranian Centre of Neurological Researchers, Neuroscience Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Silvia Favaretto
- Headache Center, Neurology Clinic, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Cédric Gollion
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital of Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Lou Grangeon
- Neurology Department, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | - Hannah Lyons
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Karol Marschollek
- Department of Neurology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - Dilara Onan
- Spine Health Unit, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Umberto Pensato
- Neurology and Stroke Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
- Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Milan, Italy
| | - Emily Stanyer
- Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, UK
| | | | - Wietse Wiels
- Faculty of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hui Zhou Chen
- Wolfson Centre for Age-Related Diseases, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Faisal Mohammad Amin
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, Rigshospitalet Glostrup, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Department of Neurorehabilitation/Traumatic Brain Injury, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Russo AF, Hay DL. CGRP physiology, pharmacology, and therapeutic targets: migraine and beyond. Physiol Rev 2023; 103:1565-1644. [PMID: 36454715 PMCID: PMC9988538 DOI: 10.1152/physrev.00059.2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 58] [Impact Index Per Article: 58.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 11/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a neuropeptide with diverse physiological functions. Its two isoforms (α and β) are widely expressed throughout the body in sensory neurons as well as in other cell types, such as motor neurons and neuroendocrine cells. CGRP acts via at least two G protein-coupled receptors that form unusual complexes with receptor activity-modifying proteins. These are the CGRP receptor and the AMY1 receptor; in rodents, additional receptors come into play. Although CGRP is known to produce many effects, the precise molecular identity of the receptor(s) that mediates CGRP effects is seldom clear. Despite the many enigmas still in CGRP biology, therapeutics that target the CGRP axis to treat or prevent migraine are a bench-to-bedside success story. This review provides a contextual background on the regulation and sites of CGRP expression and CGRP receptor pharmacology. The physiological actions of CGRP in the nervous system are discussed, along with updates on CGRP actions in the cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, immune, hematopoietic, and reproductive systems and metabolic effects of CGRP in muscle and adipose tissues. We cover how CGRP in these systems is associated with disease states, most notably migraine. In this context, we discuss how CGRP actions in both the peripheral and central nervous systems provide a basis for therapeutic targeting of CGRP in migraine. Finally, we highlight potentially fertile ground for the development of additional therapeutics and combinatorial strategies that could be designed to modulate CGRP signaling for migraine and other diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew F Russo
- Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
- Department of Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
- Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss, Department of Veterans Affairs Health Center, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Debbie L Hay
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
- Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Rimegepant [Nurtec® ODT (USA); Vydura® (EU)] is a calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist approved for the acute treatment of migraine with or without aura in adults, and for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine in adults. Rimegepant is available as an orally disintegrating tablet (ODT), which offers convenience and a potentially faster response time than the conventional tablet formulation. In pivotal phase III trials, rimegepant was more effective than placebo at relieving pain and the most bothersome symptom when taken as needed for the acute treatment of migraine. Rimegepant was also more effective than placebo at reducing the number of monthly migraine days when taken every other day for the preventive treatment of migraine. The beneficial effects of rimegepant in reducing migraine frequency and improving quality of life were maintained over the longer term (up to 52 weeks). Rimegepant was generally well tolerated, with no evidence of hepatotoxicity or cardiovascular toxicity in clinical trials. As the first dual agent approved for both treatment and prevention of migraine, rimegepant represents a useful option for the management of migraine in adults.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah A Blair
- Springer Nature, Private Bag 65901, Mairangi Bay, Auckland, 0754, New Zealand.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Ailani J, Kaiser EA, Mathew PG, McAllister P, Russo AF, Vélez C, Ramajo AP, Abdrabboh A, Xu C, Rasmussen S, Tepper SJ. Role of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide on the Gastrointestinal Symptoms of Migraine-Clinical Considerations: A Narrative Review. Neurology 2022; 99:841-853. [PMID: 36127137 PMCID: PMC9651456 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000201332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is involved in several of the pathophysiologic processes underpinning migraine attacks. Therapies that target CGRP or its receptor have shown efficacy as preventive or acute treatments for migraine. Two small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists (rimegepant and ubrogepant) are approved for the acute treatment of migraine, and 4 monoclonal antibodies (eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab) are approved for migraine prevention; erenumab targets the canonical CGRP receptor, the others CGRP ligand. CGRP plays a role in gastrointestinal nociception, inflammation, gastric acid secretion, and motility. Nausea and vomiting are among the gastrointestinal symptoms associated with migraine, but individuals with migraine may also experience functional upper and lower gastrointestinal comorbidities, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastroparesis, functional diarrhea or constipation, and irritable bowel syndrome. Although gastrointestinal symptoms in migraine can be treatment-related, they may also be attributable to increased CGRP. In this review, we summarize the epidemiologic evidence for associations between migraine and gastrointestinal disorders, consider the possible physiologic role of CGRP in these associations, and review the clinical occurrence of gastrointestinal events in patients with migraine receiving CGRP-based therapies and other migraine treatments. Because patients with migraine are at an increased risk of comorbid and treatment-related gastrointestinal effects, we also propose a patient-management strategy to mitigate these effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Ailani
- From the Department of Neurology (J.A.), Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Department of Neurology (E.A.K.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Harvard Medical School (P.G.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Braintree, MA; New England Institute for Neurology and Headache (P.G.M., P.M.), Stamford, CT; Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics (A.F.R.), Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss (A.F.R.), Iowa VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA; Center for Neurointestinal Health (A.F.R., C.V.), Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (A.P.R.), Oxford, United Kingdom; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (A.A.), East Hanover, NJ; Amgen Neuroscience (C.X., S.R.), Thousand Oaks, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth (S.J.T.), Hanover, NH.
| | - Eric A Kaiser
- From the Department of Neurology (J.A.), Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Department of Neurology (E.A.K.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Harvard Medical School (P.G.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Braintree, MA; New England Institute for Neurology and Headache (P.G.M., P.M.), Stamford, CT; Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics (A.F.R.), Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss (A.F.R.), Iowa VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA; Center for Neurointestinal Health (A.F.R., C.V.), Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (A.P.R.), Oxford, United Kingdom; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (A.A.), East Hanover, NJ; Amgen Neuroscience (C.X., S.R.), Thousand Oaks, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth (S.J.T.), Hanover, NH
| | - Paul G Mathew
- From the Department of Neurology (J.A.), Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Department of Neurology (E.A.K.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Harvard Medical School (P.G.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Braintree, MA; New England Institute for Neurology and Headache (P.G.M., P.M.), Stamford, CT; Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics (A.F.R.), Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss (A.F.R.), Iowa VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA; Center for Neurointestinal Health (A.F.R., C.V.), Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (A.P.R.), Oxford, United Kingdom; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (A.A.), East Hanover, NJ; Amgen Neuroscience (C.X., S.R.), Thousand Oaks, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth (S.J.T.), Hanover, NH
| | - Peter McAllister
- From the Department of Neurology (J.A.), Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Department of Neurology (E.A.K.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Harvard Medical School (P.G.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Braintree, MA; New England Institute for Neurology and Headache (P.G.M., P.M.), Stamford, CT; Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics (A.F.R.), Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss (A.F.R.), Iowa VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA; Center for Neurointestinal Health (A.F.R., C.V.), Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (A.P.R.), Oxford, United Kingdom; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (A.A.), East Hanover, NJ; Amgen Neuroscience (C.X., S.R.), Thousand Oaks, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth (S.J.T.), Hanover, NH
| | - Andrew F Russo
- From the Department of Neurology (J.A.), Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Department of Neurology (E.A.K.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Harvard Medical School (P.G.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Braintree, MA; New England Institute for Neurology and Headache (P.G.M., P.M.), Stamford, CT; Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics (A.F.R.), Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss (A.F.R.), Iowa VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA; Center for Neurointestinal Health (A.F.R., C.V.), Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (A.P.R.), Oxford, United Kingdom; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (A.A.), East Hanover, NJ; Amgen Neuroscience (C.X., S.R.), Thousand Oaks, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth (S.J.T.), Hanover, NH
| | - Christopher Vélez
- From the Department of Neurology (J.A.), Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Department of Neurology (E.A.K.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Harvard Medical School (P.G.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Braintree, MA; New England Institute for Neurology and Headache (P.G.M., P.M.), Stamford, CT; Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics (A.F.R.), Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss (A.F.R.), Iowa VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA; Center for Neurointestinal Health (A.F.R., C.V.), Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (A.P.R.), Oxford, United Kingdom; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (A.A.), East Hanover, NJ; Amgen Neuroscience (C.X., S.R.), Thousand Oaks, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth (S.J.T.), Hanover, NH
| | - Angela Pozo Ramajo
- From the Department of Neurology (J.A.), Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Department of Neurology (E.A.K.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Harvard Medical School (P.G.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Braintree, MA; New England Institute for Neurology and Headache (P.G.M., P.M.), Stamford, CT; Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics (A.F.R.), Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss (A.F.R.), Iowa VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA; Center for Neurointestinal Health (A.F.R., C.V.), Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (A.P.R.), Oxford, United Kingdom; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (A.A.), East Hanover, NJ; Amgen Neuroscience (C.X., S.R.), Thousand Oaks, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth (S.J.T.), Hanover, NH
| | - Ahmad Abdrabboh
- From the Department of Neurology (J.A.), Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Department of Neurology (E.A.K.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Harvard Medical School (P.G.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Braintree, MA; New England Institute for Neurology and Headache (P.G.M., P.M.), Stamford, CT; Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics (A.F.R.), Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss (A.F.R.), Iowa VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA; Center for Neurointestinal Health (A.F.R., C.V.), Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (A.P.R.), Oxford, United Kingdom; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (A.A.), East Hanover, NJ; Amgen Neuroscience (C.X., S.R.), Thousand Oaks, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth (S.J.T.), Hanover, NH
| | - Cen Xu
- From the Department of Neurology (J.A.), Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Department of Neurology (E.A.K.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Harvard Medical School (P.G.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Braintree, MA; New England Institute for Neurology and Headache (P.G.M., P.M.), Stamford, CT; Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics (A.F.R.), Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss (A.F.R.), Iowa VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA; Center for Neurointestinal Health (A.F.R., C.V.), Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (A.P.R.), Oxford, United Kingdom; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (A.A.), East Hanover, NJ; Amgen Neuroscience (C.X., S.R.), Thousand Oaks, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth (S.J.T.), Hanover, NH
| | - Soeren Rasmussen
- From the Department of Neurology (J.A.), Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Department of Neurology (E.A.K.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Harvard Medical School (P.G.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Braintree, MA; New England Institute for Neurology and Headache (P.G.M., P.M.), Stamford, CT; Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics (A.F.R.), Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss (A.F.R.), Iowa VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA; Center for Neurointestinal Health (A.F.R., C.V.), Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (A.P.R.), Oxford, United Kingdom; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (A.A.), East Hanover, NJ; Amgen Neuroscience (C.X., S.R.), Thousand Oaks, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth (S.J.T.), Hanover, NH
| | - Stewart J Tepper
- From the Department of Neurology (J.A.), Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC; Department of Neurology (E.A.K.), University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Harvard Medical School (P.G.M.), Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (P.G.M.), Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Braintree, MA; New England Institute for Neurology and Headache (P.G.M., P.M.), Stamford, CT; Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics (A.F.R.), Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA; Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss (A.F.R.), Iowa VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA; Center for Neurointestinal Health (A.F.R., C.V.), Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA; Oxford PharmaGenesis (A.P.R.), Oxford, United Kingdom; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation (A.A.), East Hanover, NJ; Amgen Neuroscience (C.X., S.R.), Thousand Oaks, CA; and Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth (S.J.T.), Hanover, NH
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Garelja ML, Hay DL. A narrative review of the calcitonin peptide family and associated receptors as migraine targets: Calcitonin gene-related peptide and beyond. Headache 2022; 62:1093-1104. [PMID: 36226379 PMCID: PMC9613588 DOI: 10.1111/head.14388] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Revised: 05/08/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To summarize the pharmacology of the calcitonin peptide family of receptors and explore their relationship to migraine and current migraine therapies. BACKGROUND Therapeutics that dampen calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) signaling are now in clinical use to prevent or treat migraine. However, CGRP belongs to a broader peptide family, including the peptides amylin and adrenomedullin. Receptors for this family are complex, displaying overlapping pharmacologic profiles. Despite the focus on CGRP and the CGRP receptor in migraine research, recent evidence implicates related peptides and receptors in migraine. METHODS This narrative review summarizes literature encompassing the current pharmacologic understanding of the calcitonin peptide family, and the evidence that links specific members of this family to migraine and migraine-like behaviors. RESULTS Recent work links amylin and adrenomedullin to migraine-like behavior in rodent models and migraine-like attacks in individuals with migraine. We collate novel information that suggests females may be more sensitive to amylin and CGRP in the context of migraine-like behaviors. We report that drugs designed to antagonize the canonical CGRP receptor also antagonize a second CGRP-responsive receptor and speculate as to whether this influences therapeutic efficacy. We also discuss the specificity of current drugs with regards to CGRP isoforms and how this may influence therapeutic profiles. Lastly, we emphasize that receptors related to, but distinct from, the canonical CGRP receptor may represent underappreciated and novel drug targets. CONCLUSION Multiple peptides within the calcitonin family have been linked to migraine. The current focus on CGRP and its canonical receptor may be obscuring pathways to further therapeutics. Drug discovery schemes that take a wider view of the receptor family may lead to the development of new anti-migraine drugs with favorable clinical profiles. We also propose that understanding these related peptides and receptors may improve our interpretation regarding the mechanism of action of current drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L. Garelja
- Department of Pharmacology and ToxicologyUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand
| | - Debbie L. Hay
- Department of Pharmacology and ToxicologyUniversity of OtagoDunedinNew Zealand,Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular BiodiscoveryUniversity of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ailani J, Kaiser EA, Mathew PG, McAllister P, Russo AF, Vélez C, Ramajo AP, Abdrabboh A, Xu C, Rasmussen S, Tepper SJ. Role of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide on the Gastrointestinal Symptoms of Migraine-Clinical Considerations: A Narrative Review. Neurology 2022. [PMID: 36127137 DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000201332.10.1212/wnl.0000000000201332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is involved in several of the pathophysiological processes underpinning migraine attacks. Therapies that target CGRP or its receptor have shown efficacy as preventive or acute treatments for migraine. Two small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists (rimegepant and ubrogepant) are approved for the acute treatment of migraine, and four monoclonal antibodies (eptinezumab, erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab) are approved for migraine prevention; erenumab targets the canonical CGRP receptor, the others CGRP ligand. CGRP plays a role in gastrointestinal nociception, inflammation, gastric acid secretion, and motility. Nausea and vomiting are among the gastrointestinal symptoms associated with migraine, but individuals with migraine may also experience functional upper and lower gastrointestinal comorbidities, such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, gastroparesis, functional diarrhea or constipation, and irritable bowel syndrome. Although gastrointestinal symptoms in migraine can be treatment-related, they may also be attributable to increased CGRP. In this review, we summarize the epidemiological evidence for associations between migraine and gastrointestinal disorders, consider the possible physiological role of CGRP in these associations, and review the clinical occurrence of gastrointestinal events in patients with migraine receiving CGRP-based therapies and other migraine treatments. Because patients with migraine are at an increased risk of comorbid and treatment-related gastrointestinal effects, we also propose a patient-management strategy to mitigate these effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Ailani
- Department of Neurology, Medstar Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Eric A Kaiser
- Department of Neurology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Paul G Mathew
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Neurology, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Neurology, Harvard Vanguard Medical Associates, Braintree, MA, USA
| | - Peter McAllister
- New England Institute for Neurology and Headache, Stamford, CT, USA
| | - Andrew F Russo
- Departments of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.,Center for the Prevention and Treatment of Visual Loss, Iowa VA Health Care System, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Christopher Vélez
- Center for Neurointestinal Health, Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Cen Xu
- Amgen Neuroscience, Thousand Oaks, CA, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Hage La Cour S, Juhler K, Kogelman LJA, Olesen J, Klærke DA, Kristensen DM, Jansen-Olesen I. Characterization of erenumab and rimegepant on calcitonin gene-related peptide induced responses in Xenopus Laevis oocytes expressing the calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor and the amylin-1 receptor. J Headache Pain 2022; 23:59. [PMID: 35614383 PMCID: PMC9134599 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-022-01425-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical use of calcitonin gene-related peptide receptor (CGRP-R) antagonists and monoclonal antibodies against CGRP and CGRP-R has offered new treatment possibilities for migraine patients. CGRP activates both the CGRP-R and structurally related amylin 1 receptor (AMY1-R). The relative effect of erenumab and the small-molecule CGRP-R antagonist, rimegepant, towards the CGRP-R and AMY-R needs to be further characterized. METHODS The effect of CGRP and two CGRP-R antagonists were examined in Xenopus laevis oocytes expressing human CGRP-R, human AMY1-R and their subunits. RESULTS CGRP administered to receptor expressing oocytes induced a concentration-dependent increase in current with the order of potency CGRP-R> > AMY1-R > calcitonin receptor (CTR). There was no effect on single components of the CGRP-R; calcitonin receptor-like receptor and receptor activity-modifying protein 1. Amylin was only effective on AMY1-R and CTR. Inhibition potencies (pIC50 values) for erenumab on CGRP induced currents were 10.86 and 9.35 for CGRP-R and AMY1-R, respectively. Rimegepant inhibited CGRP induced currents with pIC50 values of 11.30 and 9.91 for CGRP-R and AMY1-R, respectively. CONCLUSION Our results demonstrate that erenumab and rimegepant are potent antagonists of CGRP-R and AMY1-R with 32- and 25-times preference for the CGRP-R over the AMY1-R, respectively. It is discussed if this difference in affinity between the two receptors is the likely reason why constipation is a common and serious adverse effect during CGRP-R antagonism but less so with CGRP binding antibodies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanne Hage La Cour
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kiki Juhler
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lisette J A Kogelman
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Jes Olesen
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Dan Arne Klærke
- Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
| | - David Møbjerg Kristensen
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Inserm (Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale), Irset - Inserm UMR 1085, Rennes, France
- Department of Biology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Inger Jansen-Olesen
- Danish Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Strassman AM, Melo-Carrillo A, Houle TT, Adams A, Brin MF, Burstein R. Atogepant - an orally-administered CGRP antagonist - attenuates activation of meningeal nociceptors by CSD. Cephalalgia 2022; 42:933-943. [PMID: 35332801 DOI: 10.1177/03331024221083544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated the mechanism of action of atogepant, a small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonist recently approved for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine, by assessing its effect on activation of mechanosensitive C- and Aδ-meningeal nociceptors following cortical spreading depression. METHODS Single-unit recordings of trigeminal ganglion neurons (32 Aδ and 20 C-fibers) innervating the dura was used to document effects of orally administered atogepant (5 mg/kg) or vehicle on cortical spreading depression-induced activation in anesthetized male rats. RESULTS Bayesian analysis of time effects found that atogepant did not completely prevent the activation of nociceptors at the tested dose, but it significantly reduced response amplitude and probability of response in both the C- and the Aδ-fibers at different time intervals following cortical spreading depression induction. For C-fibers, the reduction in responses was significant in the early phase (first hour), but not delayed phase of activation, whereas in Aδ-fibers, significant reduction in activation was apparent in the delayed phase (second and third hours) but not early phase of activation. CONCLUSIONS These findings identify differences between the actions of atogepant, a small molecule CGRP antagonist (partially inhibiting both Aδ and C-fibers) and those found previously for fremanezumab, a CGRP-targeted antibody (inhibiting Aδ fibers only) and onabotulinumtoxinA (inhibiting C-fibers only)- suggesting that these agents differ in their mechanisms for the preventive treatment of migraine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew M Strassman
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Agustin Melo-Carrillo
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Timothy T Houle
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Aubrey Adams
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA
| | - Mitchell F Brin
- Allergan, an AbbVie Company, Irvine, CA, USA.,Dept of Neurology, University of California, Irvine, USA
| | - Rami Burstein
- Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Moreno-Ajona D, Villar-Martínez MD, Goadsby PJ. New Generation Gepants: Migraine Acute and Preventive Medications. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11061656. [PMID: 35329982 PMCID: PMC8953732 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a debilitating disease whose clinical and social impact is out of debate. Tolerability issues, interactions, contraindications, and inefficacy of the available medications make new options necessary. The calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway has shown its importance in migraine pathophysiology and specific medications targeting this have become available. The first-generation CGRP receptor antagonists or gepants, have undergone clinical trials but their development was stopped because of hepatotoxicity. The new generation of gepants, however, are efficacious, safe, and well tolerated as per recent clinical trials. This led to the FDA-approval of rimegepant, ubrogepant, and atogepant. The clinical trials of the available gepants and some of the newer CGRP-antagonists are reviewed in this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Moreno-Ajona
- Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 9PJ, UK; (D.M.-A.); (M.D.V.-M.)
- NIHR-Wellcome Trust King’s Clinical Research Facility/SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - María Dolores Villar-Martínez
- Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 9PJ, UK; (D.M.-A.); (M.D.V.-M.)
- NIHR-Wellcome Trust King’s Clinical Research Facility/SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
| | - Peter J. Goadsby
- Basic and Clinical Neurosciences, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King’s College London, London SE5 9PJ, UK; (D.M.-A.); (M.D.V.-M.)
- NIHR-Wellcome Trust King’s Clinical Research Facility/SLaM Biomedical Research Centre, King’s College Hospital, London SE5 9RS, UK
- Department of Neurology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Simonetta I, Riolo R, Todaro F, Tuttolomondo A. New Insights on Metabolic and Genetic Basis of Migraine: Novel Impact on Management and Therapeutical Approach. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23063018. [PMID: 35328439 PMCID: PMC8955051 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23063018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2022] [Revised: 03/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Migraine is a hereditary disease, usually one-sided, sometimes bilateral. It is characterized by moderate to severe pain, which worsens with physical activity and may be associated with nausea and vomiting, may be accompanied by photophobia and phonophobia. The disorder can occur at any time of the day and can last from 4 to 72 h, with and without aura. The pathogenic mechanism is unclear, but extensive preclinical and clinical studies are ongoing. According to electrophysiology and imaging studies, many brain areas are involved, such as cerebral cortex, thalamus, hypothalamus, and brainstem. The activation of the trigeminovascular system has a key role in the headache phase. There also appears to be a genetic basis behind the development of migraine. Numerous alterations have been identified, and in addition to the genetic cause, there is also a close association with the surrounding environment, as if on the one hand, the genetic alterations may be responsible for the onset of migraine, on the other, the environmental factors seem to be more strongly associated with exacerbations. This review is an analysis of neurophysiological mechanisms, neuropeptide activity, and genetic alterations that play a fundamental role in choosing the best therapeutic strategy. To date, the goal is to create a therapy that is as personalized as possible, and for this reason, steps forward have been made in the pharmacological field in order to identify new therapeutic strategies for both acute treatment and prophylaxis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Simonetta
- Internal Medicine and Stroke Care Ward, Department of Promoting Health, Maternal-Infant Excellence and Internal and Specialized Medicine (ProMISE) G. D’Alessandro, University of Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche n.2, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (I.S.); (R.R.); (F.T.)
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine PhD Programme, University of Palermo, P.zza delle Cliniche n.2, 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Renata Riolo
- Internal Medicine and Stroke Care Ward, Department of Promoting Health, Maternal-Infant Excellence and Internal and Specialized Medicine (ProMISE) G. D’Alessandro, University of Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche n.2, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (I.S.); (R.R.); (F.T.)
| | - Federica Todaro
- Internal Medicine and Stroke Care Ward, Department of Promoting Health, Maternal-Infant Excellence and Internal and Specialized Medicine (ProMISE) G. D’Alessandro, University of Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche n.2, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (I.S.); (R.R.); (F.T.)
| | - Antonino Tuttolomondo
- Internal Medicine and Stroke Care Ward, Department of Promoting Health, Maternal-Infant Excellence and Internal and Specialized Medicine (ProMISE) G. D’Alessandro, University of Palermo, Piazza delle Cliniche n.2, 90127 Palermo, Italy; (I.S.); (R.R.); (F.T.)
- Molecular and Clinical Medicine PhD Programme, University of Palermo, P.zza delle Cliniche n.2, 90127 Palermo, Italy
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Ribeiro dos Santos JB, Ribeiro da Silva MR. Small molecule CGRP receptor antagonists for the preventive treatment of migraine: A review. Eur J Pharmacol 2022; 922:174902. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2022.174902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Revised: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
|
21
|
Garelja ML, Bower RL, Brimble MA, Chand S, Harris PW, Jamaluddin MA, Petersen J, Siow A, Walker CS, Hay DL. Pharmacological characterisation of mouse calcitonin and calcitonin receptor-like receptors reveals differences compared with human receptors. Br J Pharmacol 2022; 179:416-434. [PMID: 34289083 PMCID: PMC8776895 DOI: 10.1111/bph.15628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The calcitonin (CT) receptor family is complex, comprising two receptors (the CT receptor [CTR] and the CTR-like receptor [CLR]), three accessory proteins (RAMPs) and multiple endogenous peptides. This family contains several important drug targets, including CGRP, which is targeted by migraine therapeutics. The pharmacology of this receptor family is poorly characterised in species other than rats and humans. To facilitate understanding of translational and preclinical data, we need to know the receptor pharmacology of this family in mice. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH Plasmids encoding mouse CLR/CTR and RAMPs were transiently transfected into Cos-7 cells. cAMP production was measured in response to agonists in the absence or presence of antagonists. KEY RESULTS We report the first synthesis and characterisation of mouse adrenomedullin, adrenomedullin 2 and βCGRP and of mouse CTR without or with mouse RAMPs. Receptors containing m-CTR had subtly different pharmacology than human receptors; they were promiscuous in their pharmacology, both with and without RAMPs. Several peptides, including mouse αCGRP and mouse adrenomedullin 2, were potent agonists of the m-CTR:m-RAMP3 complex. Pharmacological profiles of receptors comprising m-CLR:m-RAMPs were generally similar to those of their human counterparts, albeit with reduced specificity. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS Mouse receptor pharmacology differed from that in humans, with mouse receptors displaying reduced discrimination between ligands. This creates challenges for interpreting which receptor may underlie an effect in preclinical models and thus translation of findings from mice to humans. It also highlights the need for new ligands to differentiate between these complexes. LINKED ARTICLES This article is part of a themed issue on Advances in Migraine and Headache Therapy (BJP 75th Anniversary).. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v179.3/issuetoc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael L. Garelja
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand,School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
| | - Rebekah L Bower
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
| | - Margaret A. Brimble
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand,Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand,School of Chemical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
| | - Shanan Chand
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
| | - Paul W.R. Harris
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand,Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand,School of Chemical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
| | | | - Jakeb Petersen
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
| | - Andrew Siow
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand,School of Chemical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
| | - Christopher S. Walker
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand,Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand
| | - Debbie L. Hay
- Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, 9016, New Zealand,School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand,Maurice Wilkins Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand,Author to whom correspondence should be addressed,
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Al-Hassany L, Goadsby PJ, Danser AHJ, MaassenVanDenBrink A. Calcitonin gene-related peptide-targeting drugs for migraine: how pharmacology might inform treatment decisions. Lancet Neurol 2022; 21:284-294. [DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(21)00409-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2021] [Revised: 09/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
23
|
Kim YJ, Granstein RD. Roles of calcitonin gene-related peptide in the skin, and other physiological and pathophysiological functions. Brain Behav Immun Health 2021; 18:100361. [PMID: 34746878 PMCID: PMC8551410 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbih.2021.100361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2021] [Revised: 10/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/02/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Skin immunity is regulated by many mediator molecules. One is the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). CGRP has roles in regulating the function of components of the immune system including T cells, B cells, dendritic cells (DCs), endothelial cells (ECs), and mast cells (MCs). Herein we discuss actions of CGRP in mediating inflammatory and vascular effects in various cutaneous models and disorders. CGRP can help to recruit immune cells through endothelium-dependent vasodilation. CGRP plays an important role in the pathogenesis of neurogenic inflammation. Functions of many components in the immune system are influenced by CGRP. CGRP regulates various inflammatory processes in human skin by affecting different cell-types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yee Jung Kim
- Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1305 York Avenue, WGC9, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Richard D Granstein
- Department of Dermatology, Weill Cornell Medicine, 1305 York Avenue, WGC9, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tasma Z, Siow A, Harris PWR, Brimble MA, Hay DL, Walker CS. Characterisation of agonist signalling profiles and agonist-dependent antagonism at PACAP-responsive receptors: Implications for drug discovery. Br J Pharmacol 2021; 179:435-453. [PMID: 34612509 DOI: 10.1111/bph.15700] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 08/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating peptide (PACAP) family is of clinical interest for the treatment of migraine. These peptides activate three different PACAP-responsive class B G protein-coupled receptors: the PAC1 , VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors. The PAC1 receptor may be alternatively spliced, generating variants that can differ in their pharmacological or signalling profiles. To inform drug discovery efforts targeting migraine, we need to better understand how the different PACAP-responsive receptors signal and how effectively these responses can be blocked by antagonists. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH The signalling profiles of the human PAC1n , PAC1s , VPAC1 and VPAC2 receptors were examined in transfected Cos7 cells for cAMP, IP1 , pAkt, pERK and pCREB. Biased signalling was then quantified. The ability of antagonists to block PACAP-38, PACAP-27 or VIP stimulated cAMP accumulation at PACAP-responsive receptors was also determined. KEY RESULTS PACAP-responsive receptors exhibited varied pharmacological profiles but activated signalling in a similar manner. The PAC1n and PAC1s receptors displayed distinct pharmacology. At the PAC1s receptor, VIP and PHM were more potent than at the PAC1n receptor. PACAP-responsive receptors displayed agonist-dependent antagonism where PACAP-38 was less effectively antagonised compared to PACAP-27 and VIP. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The distinct pharmacological profile displayed by the PAC1s receptor suggests that it can act as a dual receptor for VIP and PACAP. Furthermore, the effectiveness of blocking a signalling pathway can be influenced by which endogenous PACAP family agonist is present. These effects have potential implications for the development and effectiveness of drugs targeting the PACAP system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zoe Tasma
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Andrew Siow
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,School of Chemical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Paul W R Harris
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,School of Chemical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Maurice Wilkins Centre and Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Margaret A Brimble
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,School of Chemical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Maurice Wilkins Centre and Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Debbie L Hay
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Maurice Wilkins Centre and Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand
| | - Christopher S Walker
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.,Maurice Wilkins Centre and Centre for Molecular Biodiscovery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Edvinsson L, Edvinsson JCA, Haanes KA. Biological and small molecule strategies in migraine therapy with relation to the calcitonin gene-related peptide family of peptides. Br J Pharmacol 2021; 179:371-380. [PMID: 34411289 DOI: 10.1111/bph.15669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2021] [Revised: 08/10/2021] [Accepted: 08/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Migraine is one of the most common of neurological disorders with a global prevalence of up to 15%. One in five migraineurs have frequent episodic or chronic migraine requiring prophylactic treatment. In recent years, specific pharmacological treatments targeting calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) signalling molecules have provided safe and effective treatments, monoclonal antibodies for prophylaxis and gepants for acute therapy. Albeit beneficial, it is important to understand the molecular mechanisms of these new drugs to better understand migraine pathophysiology and improve therapy. Here, we describe current views on the role of the CGRP family of peptides - CGRP, calcitonin, adrenomedullin, amylin - and their receptors in the trigeminovascular system. All these molecules are present within the trigeminovascular system but differ in expression and localization. It is likely that they have different roles, which can be utilized in providing additional drug targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Edvinsson
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Experimental Research, Glostrup Research Institute, Glostrup Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| | - Jacob C A Edvinsson
- Department of Clinical Experimental Research, Glostrup Research Institute, Glostrup Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark.,Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kristian A Haanes
- Departments of Internal Medicine, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Experimental Research, Glostrup Research Institute, Glostrup Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Leung L, Liao S, Wu C. To Probe the Binding Interactions between Two FDA Approved Migraine Drugs (Ubrogepant and Rimegepant) and Calcitonin-Gene Related Peptide Receptor (CGRPR) Using Molecular Dynamics Simulations. ACS Chem Neurosci 2021; 12:2629-2642. [PMID: 34184869 DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.1c00135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Recently, the FDA approved ubrogepant and rimegepant as oral drugs to treat migraines by targeting the calcitonin-gene related peptide receptor (CGRPR). Unfortunately, there is no high-resolution complex structure with these two drugs; thus the detailed interaction between drugs and the receptor remains elusive. This study uses molecular docking and molecular dynamics simulation to model the drug-receptor complex and analyze their binding interactions at a molecular level. The complex crystal structure (3N7R) of the gepant drugs' predecessor, olcegepant, was used for our molecular docking of the two drugs and served as a control system. The three systems, with ubrogepant, rimegepant, and crystal olcegepant, were subject to 3 × 1000 ns molecular dynamics simulations and followed by the simulation interaction diagram (SID), structural clustering, and MM-GBSA binding energy analyses. Our MD data revealed that olcegepant binds most strongly to the CGRPR, followed by ubrogepant and then rimegepant, largely due to changes in hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions. The order of our MM-GBSA binding energies of these three compounds is consistent with their experimental IC50 values. SID analysis revealed the pharmacophore of the gepant class to be the dihydroquinazolinone group derivative. Subtle differences in interaction profile have been noted, including interactions with the W74 and W72 residues. The ubrogepant and rimegepant both contact A70 and M42 of the receptor, while olcegepant does not. The results of this study elucidate the interactions in the binding pocket of CGRP receptor and can assist in further development for orally available antagonists of the CGRP receptor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Leung
- College of Letters and Sciences, University of California, Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93107, United States
| | - Siyan Liao
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Target & Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511436, China
- College of Science and Mathematics, Rowan University, Glassboro, New Jersey 08028, United States
| | - Chun Wu
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Target & Clinical Pharmacology, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 511436, China
- College of Science and Mathematics, Rowan University, Glassboro, New Jersey 08028, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Mackenzie KD, Stratton JR. Response to letter to the Editor: Assessing migraine therapeutics. Cephalalgia 2021; 41:1404-1406. [PMID: 34190636 DOI: 10.1177/03331024211021563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
28
|
de Vries T, Al-Hassany L, MaassenVanDenBrink A. Evaluating rimegepant for the treatment of migraine. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2021; 22:973-979. [PMID: 33648385 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2021.1895749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
IntroductionCalcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a vasodilatory neuropeptide involved in the pathophysiology of migraine, a highly disabling neurovascular disorder characterized by severe headache attacks. Rimegepant is a small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonist approved by the FDA for acute treatment of migraine and currently under investigation for migraine prophylaxis. Areas covered The authors summarize available data on safety and tolerability of rimegepant and provide insights on its use for acute migraine treatment. Expert opinion Rimegepant seems to be well tolerated and superior to placebo for two-hour pain freedom. Moreover, rimegepant does not induce vasoconstriction, and is therefore not contraindicated in patients with cardiovascular disease, nor does it seem to induce medication-overuse headache. However, the therapeutic gain of rimegepant is only small, and since CGRP is a vital rescue molecule during ischemia, blocking the CGRP pathway might be detrimental. Although current evidence on CGRP receptor blockade has shown no cardiovascular adverse events, clinicians should remain critical about the use of rimegepant, as well as other CGRP (receptor)-inhibiting drugs. Further research should focus on determining the consequences of long-term CGRP blockade, especially during ischemia or cardiovascular disease, the exact receptors antagonized by rimegepant, and potential effects of combining rimegepant with other antimigraine treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tessa de Vries
- Erasmus MC, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pharmacology and Vascular Medicine, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Linda Al-Hassany
- Erasmus MC, Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Pharmacology and Vascular Medicine, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bhakta M, Vuong T, Taura T, Wilson DS, Stratton JR, Mackenzie KD. Migraine therapeutics differentially modulate the CGRP pathway. Cephalalgia 2021; 41:499-514. [PMID: 33626922 PMCID: PMC8054164 DOI: 10.1177/0333102420983282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background The clinical efficacy of migraine therapeutic agents directed
towards the calcitonin-gene related peptide (CGRP) pathway has
confirmed the key role of this axis in migraine pathogenesis.
Three antibodies against CGRP – fremanezumab, galcanezumab and
eptinezumab – and one antibody against the CGRP receptor,
erenumab, are clinically approved therapeutics for the
prevention of migraine. In addition, two small molecule CGRP
receptor antagonists, ubrogepant and rimegepant, are approved
for acute migraine treatment. Targeting either the CGRP ligand
or receptor is efficacious for migraine treatment; however, a
comparison of the mechanism of action of these therapeutic
agents is lacking in the literature. Methods To gain insights into the potential differences between these CGRP
pathway therapeutics, we compared the effect of a CGRP ligand
antibody (fremanezumab), a CGRP receptor antibody (erenumab) and
a CGRP receptor small molecule antagonist (telcagepant) using a
combination of binding, functional and imaging assays. Results Erenumab and telcagepant antagonized CGRP, adrenomedullin and
intermedin cAMP signaling at the canonical human CGRP receptor.
In contrast, fremanezumab only antagonized CGRP-induced cAMP
signaling at the human CGRP receptor. In addition, erenumab, but
not fremanezumab, bound and internalized at the canonical human
CGRP receptor. Interestingly, erenumab also bound and
internalized at the human AMY1 receptor, a CGRP
receptor family member. Both erenumab and telcagepant
antagonized amylin-induced cAMP signaling at the AMY1
receptor while fremanezumab did not affect amylin responses. Conclusion The therapeutic effect of agents targeting the CGRP ligand versus
receptor for migraine prevention (antibodies) or acute treatment
(gepants) may involve distinct mechanisms of action. These
findings suggest that differing mechanisms could affect
efficacy, safety, and/or tolerability in migraine patients.
Collapse
|
30
|
New drug approvals for 2020: Synthesis and clinical applications. Eur J Med Chem 2021; 215:113284. [PMID: 33611190 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2021.113284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2021] [Revised: 02/03/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
53 New drugs including 38 chemical entities and 15 biologics were approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration during 2020. Among the marketed drugs, 34 new small molecule drugs and 4 new diagnostic agents with privileged structures and novel clinical applications represent as promising leads for the development of new drugs with the similar indications and improved therapeutic efficacy. This review is mainly focused on the clinical applications and synthetic methods of 34 small-molecule drugs newly approved by the FDA in 2020.
Collapse
|
31
|
Edvinsson L, Haanes KA. Identifying New Antimigraine Targets: Lessons from Molecular Biology. Trends Pharmacol Sci 2021; 42:217-225. [PMID: 33495027 DOI: 10.1016/j.tips.2021.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Revised: 12/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Primary headaches are one of the most common conditions; migraine being most prevalent. Recent work on the pathophysiology of migraine suggests a mismatch in the communication or tuning of the trigeminovascular system, leading to sensitization and the release of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP). In the current Opinion, we use the up-to-date molecular understanding of mechanisms behind migraine pain, to provide novel aspects on how to modify the system and for the development of future treatments; acute as well as prophylactic. We explore the distribution and the expression of neuropeptides themselves, as well as certain ion channels, and most importantly how they may act in concert as modulators of excitability of both the trigeminal C neurons and the Aδ neurons.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lars Edvinsson
- Department of Clinical Experimental Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Denmark; Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Experimental Vascular Research, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
| | - Kristian Agmund Haanes
- Department of Clinical Experimental Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet-Glostrup, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|