1
|
Tano M, Paubel P, Ribault M, Degrassat-Théas A. Comparison of Two Financial Incentives to Encourage the Use of Adalimumab Biosimilars: Results of a French Experiment Close to Clinicians. PHARMACOECONOMICS - OPEN 2024:10.1007/s41669-024-00505-7. [PMID: 38956007 DOI: 10.1007/s41669-024-00505-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/10/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2018, the French government introduced two mutually exclusive financial incentives to increase etanercept and insulin glargine biosimilar use. The general case redirects 20% of the price difference between the reference product and its biosimilars to hospitals for every biosimilar dispensed in community pharmacies from hospital prescriptions. The experimental case redirects 30% to prescribing clinical units after hospital selection. Adalimumab was added to these incentives in 2019, after its first biosimilar was launched. OBJECTIVE This retrospective observational study aimed to compare both general and experimental incentives after 19 months to assess the impact of directly incentivizing clinical units for adalimumab biosimilars. METHOD The monthly number of adalimumab boxes dispensed in community pharmacies was linked to the corresponding hospital's prescription using IQVIA Xponent data from November 2017 to October 2020. The monthly mean rate of adalimumab biosimilars was compared between incentive groups and subgroups depending on hospitals' prior experience with the etanercept experimental case. RESULTS General case hospitals had a significantly lower mean biosimilar uptake (16.7% vs 23.2%, p = 0.029) than those included in the experimental case. Twenty-three of the 40 hospitals in the experimental case and ten out of the 91 hospitals studied in the general case had already taken part in the etanercept experiment. Biosimilar uptake was higher, but not statistically significant, for hospitals with prior experience in the adalimumab general case group (p = 0.086). CONCLUSIONS This study confirmed that incentivizing close to physicians was more effective in increasing the biosimilar rate. It also suggested that previous incentive experience positively influenced biosimilar penetration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marion Tano
- General Agency of Equipment and Health Products (AGEPS), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 7, rue du Fer à Moulin, 75005, Paris cedex, France.
- Health Law and Health Economics Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Paris Cité, 4 avenue de l'Observatoire, 75006, Paris, France.
- Health Law Institute, Inserm, UMR S 1145, Paris University, Université Paris Cité, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75270, Paris Cedex 6, France.
- , 24, rue Jean Baptiste Potin, 92130, Issy les Moulineaux, France.
| | - Pascal Paubel
- General Agency of Equipment and Health Products (AGEPS), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 7, rue du Fer à Moulin, 75005, Paris cedex, France
- Health Law and Health Economics Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Paris Cité, 4 avenue de l'Observatoire, 75006, Paris, France
- Health Law Institute, Inserm, UMR S 1145, Paris University, Université Paris Cité, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75270, Paris Cedex 6, France
| | - Matthieu Ribault
- General Agency of Equipment and Health Products (AGEPS), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 7, rue du Fer à Moulin, 75005, Paris cedex, France
| | - Albane Degrassat-Théas
- General Agency of Equipment and Health Products (AGEPS), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), 7, rue du Fer à Moulin, 75005, Paris cedex, France
- Health Law and Health Economics Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Paris Cité, 4 avenue de l'Observatoire, 75006, Paris, France
- Health Law Institute, Inserm, UMR S 1145, Paris University, Université Paris Cité, 45 rue des Saints-Pères, 75270, Paris Cedex 6, France
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rieger C, Dean JA, Hall L, Vasquez P, Merlo G. Barriers and Enablers Affecting the Uptake of Biosimilar Medicines Viewed Through the Lens of Actor Network Theory: A Systematic Review. BioDrugs 2024; 38:541-555. [PMID: 38879730 PMCID: PMC11247062 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00659-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Biosimilars represent an opportunity to realise savings against the costs of innovative medicines. Despite efforts made by stakeholders, there are numerous barriers to the uptake of biosimilars. To realise the promise of biosimilars reducing costs, barriers must be identified, understood, and overcome, and enablers magnified. The aim of this systematic review is to summarise the enablers and barriers affecting uptake of biosimilars through the application of a classification system to organise them into healthcare professional (HCP), patient, or systemic categories. METHODS A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, eConlit, and Embase. Included were primary research studies published in English between Jan 2017 through June 2023 focused on enablers and barriers affecting uptake of biosimilars. Excluded studies comprised comparisons of biosimilar efficacy and safety versus the reference biologic. One reviewer extracted data that included classification of barriers or enablers, the sub-classification, and the identification of the degree of agency associated with the actor through their role and associations as a mediator within their network, through the application of Actor Network Theory. The data were validated by a second reviewer (PV). RESULTS Of the 94 studies included, 59 were cross-sectional, 20 were qualitative research, 12 were cohort studies, and three were economic evaluations. Within the review, 51 of the studies included HCP populations and 35 included patients. Policies and guidelines were the most cited group of enablers, overall. Systemic enablers were addressed in 29 studies. For patients, the most frequently cited enabler was positive framing of a biosimilar, while for HCPs, cost benefit was the most frequently noted enabler. The most frequently discussed systemic barrier to biosimilar acceptance was lack of effective policies or guidelines, followed by lack of financial incentives, while the most significant barriers for HCPs and patients, respectively, were their lack of general knowledge about biosimilars and concerns about safety and efficacy. Systemic actors and HCPs most frequently acted with broad degree of agency as mediators, while patient most frequently acted with a narrow degree of agency as mediators within their networks. CONCLUSIONS Barriers and enablers affecting uptake of biosimilars are interconnected within networks, and can be divided into systemic, HCP, and patient categories. Understanding the agency of actors within networks may allow for more comprehensive and effective approaches. Systemic enablers in the form of policies appear to be the most effective overall levers in affecting uptake of biosimilars, with policy makers advised to give careful consideration to appropriately educating HCPs and positively framing biosimilars for patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chad Rieger
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
| | - Judith A Dean
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Lisa Hall
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Paola Vasquez
- Centre for Health Services Research, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Gregory Merlo
- Faculty of Medicine, School of Public Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Stajszczyk M, Batko K, Żuber ZM, Kwiatkowska B, Krajewska-Włodarczyk M, Batko B. Charting the Etanercept Journey: Tracing Cost Dynamics in Poland's Off-Patent Market from Reference Drug Rivalry to Biosimilar Monopoly. BioDrugs 2024; 38:557-569. [PMID: 38861154 PMCID: PMC11247056 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-024-00663-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/16/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate the pricing of etanercept (ETN) reference and biosimilar drugs in a changing competitive to monopolized market. METHODS We conducted a comprehensive, retrospective analysis of ETN market competition, specifically changes in tender price based on shifts in market monopoly, including the effects on cost evolution, in the off-patent market in Poland. We included a total of 473 tenders for ETN purchase in dedicated biologic drug reimbursement programs, covering both pre-filled syringes and automatic injectors. This study covers the timeframe from November 2017 to December 2023, throughout which we evaluated a unique setting of ETN market re-monopolization from the perspective of payer, hospital and patient benefits resulting from changing cost calculations. RESULTS Between 2017 and 2022, Erelzi was recorded as having the largest total tender volume (59%), with a mean price [per ETN daily defined dose (DDD)] of €7.28, followed by Enbrel (31%, €8.34) and Benepali (10%, €9.45), respectively. Over the last 6 months of waning market competition, the mean price for winning bids was estimated at €5.69. After market re-monopolization by an ETN biosimilar, the mean price of winning bids increased to €8.09, and continued to increase (€9.71) in the last 6 months of available follow-up. In contrast to the competitive era, no significant relationship between tender volume and winning price was recorded after re-monopolization. In the most recent tenders, mean ETN prices increased up to €15.82, nearly tripling the lowest prices of the competitive market period. In the early re-monopolization market, mean annual treatment cost per patient is estimated at over €3800, which exceeds therapy costs in the prior competitive market years, and is expected to increase to over €6200 based on the most recent tenders. On a healthcare system level, this corresponds to over €3.42 million excess costs due to market monopoly. Higher ETN prices resulted in downstream failure of regulatory incentives to promote affordable biologics. Due to higher pricing, hospitals lost over an estimated €2.52 million, with possible risk of treatment restrictions. For the same reason, the public payer achieved comparable savings, allowing for partial coverage of higher reimbursement expenses. CONCLUSIONS This nation-level scenario of market re-monopolization by a biosimilar drug confirms net loss and excess costs for the healthcare payer, as can be expected from economic theory. The upwards drug repricing and restriction of treatment availability occurs much more rapidly than the decrement in a period of market competition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcin Stajszczyk
- Department of Rheumatology and Autoimmune Diseases, Silesian Center for Rheumatology, Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, Ustroń, Poland.
| | - Krzysztof Batko
- Department of Dermatology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland
| | - Zbigniew Michał Żuber
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University, Krakow, Poland
| | - Brygida Kwiatkowska
- Early Arthritis Clinic, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, Warszawa, Poland
| | | | - Bogdan Batko
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski University, Kraków, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dean EB, Pierre R, Carter S, Bond AM. Role of supply chain intermediaries in steering hospital product choice: Group Purchasing Organizations and biosimilars. HEALTH AFFAIRS SCHOLAR 2024; 2:qxae067. [PMID: 38841720 PMCID: PMC11152204 DOI: 10.1093/haschl/qxae067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2024] [Revised: 05/10/2024] [Accepted: 05/14/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024]
Abstract
Over 95% of hospitals in the United States use pooling alliances, known as Group Purchasing Organizations (GPOs), to purchase medications, devices, and supplies. While GPOs create savings for hospitals through lowered prices and reduced administrative burden, critics allege that these supply chain intermediaries reduce competition, particularly if GPOs concentrate purchasing from larger, dominant manufacturers. Using a mixed-methods design, we studied whether GPOs influence hospital purchasing behavior and explored the contracting mechanisms used by GPOs. Focusing on 4 high-cost biologic molecules that face competition from generic-like biosimilars between 2015 and 2019, we found that biosimilar uptake was 16%-23% higher among Traditional Medicare patients in hospitals associated with 2 of the 3 top GPOs as compared with smaller GPOs. The increase in biosimilar use was driven by single biosimilar brands that varied by GPO. Based on qualitative interviews, these 2 GPOs used more aggressive contracting strategies to steer member hospitals to specific biosimilar brands. To date, the use of GPOs and these aggressive contracting strategies appear to have increased biosimilar use, suggesting savings for payers and patients. However, single-source GPO contracting could inhibit competition or create shortages in the long term. Transparency on GPO practices and pricing strategies is needed for further GPO evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Boswell Dean
- Miami Herbert Business School, Coral Gables, FL 33146, United States
| | - Reekarl Pierre
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Samuel Carter
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Amelia M Bond
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10065, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Murray GM, Griffith N, Sinnappurajar P, Al Julandani DA, Clarke SLN, Hawley DP, Choi J, Guly CM, Ramanan AV. Clinical Efficacy of Biosimilar Switch of Adalimumab for Management of Uveitis. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2024; 32:442-446. [PMID: 36803373 PMCID: PMC11057845 DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2023.2172591] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 01/19/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adalimumab has demonstrated efficacy in non-infectious uveitis. With the introduction of biosimilar agents such as Amgevita, we aimed to quantify efficacy and tolerability compared to Humira in a multi-centre UK cohort. METHODS Patients identified from tertiary uveitis clinics in 3 centres, after institution-mandated switching was implemented. RESULTS Data collected for 102 patients, aged 2-75 years, with 185 active eyes. Following switch, rates of uveitis flare were not significantly different (13 events before, 21 after, p = .132). Rates of elevated intraocular pressure were decreased (32 before, 25 afterwards, p = .006) and dosing of oral and intra-ocular steroids was stable. Twenty-four patients (24%) requested to return to Humira, commonly due to pain from injection or technical difficulty with the device. CONCLUSION Amgevita is safe and effective for inflammatory uveitis with non-inferiority to Humira. Significant numbers of patients requested to switch back due to side effects including injection site reactions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G. M. Murray
- Department of Rheumatology, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK
| | - N. Griffith
- Department of Ophthalmology Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - P. Sinnappurajar
- Department of Rheumatology, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK
| | - D. A. Al Julandani
- Department of Rheumatology, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK
| | - S. L. N. Clarke
- Department of Rheumatology, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK
- MRC Integrative Epidemiology Unit and School of Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - D. P. Hawley
- Department of Rheumatology Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - J. Choi
- Department of Ophthalmology Sheffield Teaching Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
- Department of Rheumatology Sheffield Children’s NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - C. M. Guly
- Department of Ophthalmology University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Athimalaipet V. Ramanan
- Department of Rheumatology, Bristol Royal Hospital for Children, Bristol, UK
- Bristol Medical School: Translational Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Machado S, Cruz A, Ferreira PL, Morais C, Pimenta RE. Policy measures and instruments used in European countries to increase biosimilar uptake: a systematic review. Front Public Health 2024; 12:1263472. [PMID: 38481843 PMCID: PMC10932952 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1263472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 07/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction While biosimilar medicines can contribute to the sustainability of healthcare systems, their utilization rate varies across European countries. This study aims to identify and systematize policy measures and instruments used in European countries to increase biosimilar market share. Methods A systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 recommendations. Medline-PubMed, Web of Science and ScienceDirect databases were searched using inclusion criteria that required full articles published in English between January 2006 and November 2023. Reviews, letters, reports, editorials and comments or opinion articles were excluded from this study. Results Of the 1,137 articles, only 13 met the eligibility criteria for analysis, which covered a total of 28 European countries. Pricing regulation measures were found in 27 of these countries with tendering, price-linkage and internal reference price being the most used. Tendering was used by 27 countries to procure biosimilars in inpatient setting. Prescribing guidelines and recommendations were the widely used instrument. Some European countries adopted physician incentives, quotas, and prescription by international non-proprietary name. Conclusion Automatic substitution was not commonly recommended or applied. Interchangeability and switching will become increasingly relevant issues. It is important that the positive results from some countries serve as an example for the future of these medicines in the European market. Systematic review registration https://inplasy.com/, Identifier INPLASY2023120032.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Agostinho Cruz
- LAQV-REQUIMTE, ESS, Polytechnic of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Pedro Lopes Ferreira
- Faculty of Economics, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
- Centre for Health Studies and Research of the University of Coimbra/Centre for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CEISUC/CIBB), Coimbra, Portugal
| | - Carminda Morais
- Centre for Health Studies and Research of the University of Coimbra/Centre for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CEISUC/CIBB), Coimbra, Portugal
- School of Health, Polytechnic of Viana do Castelo, Viana do Castelo, Portugal
| | - Rui Esteves Pimenta
- ESS, Polytechnic of Porto, Porto, Portugal
- Centre for Health Studies and Research of the University of Coimbra/Centre for Innovative Biomedicine and Biotechnology (CEISUC/CIBB), Coimbra, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Pontes MA, Ribeiro AA, Albuquerque FC, Leite Cotenzini SN. Comparative price analysis of biological medicines: disparities generated by different pricing policies. Front Pharmacol 2024; 14:1256542. [PMID: 38273835 PMCID: PMC10808539 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1256542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/27/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Biological medicines have been assuming an important role among the therapeutic options for several diseases, however, due to their complex production process, the products obtained from this technology have a high added value and do not reach the purchasing power of most patients, which overwhelms the budget of health systems. With the development of biosimilars, which have reduced production costs, it is expected that access to biological medicines will become broader. However, in Brazil, the criteria for determining the price of biosimilars, unlike the generic policy in the country, do not foresee a price reduction due to the reduction of development costs. Objective: To understand the impact of the current model of economic regulation on the availability and access of these products in the country, based on a comparative analysis in selected countries, and identify trends that can help to expand the availability and access to biological medicines. Method: Quantitative and qualitative study, to identify the variation between the entry prices of biological medicines in Brazil and in selected countries, as well as the differences in the economic regulation policies established in these countries. Results: The results demonstrate that the current pricing model in Brazil has generated distortions in the prices of biosimilars in the market, which, consequently, makes it difficult for the population to access this category of products, in addition to allowing unsustainable market practices for the systems of public and private health in Brazil. It was also found that most of the analyzed countries, unlike Brazil, seek to harmonize the prices of different brands of the same molecule marketed in the country and with the international market, in addition to establishing incentive policies for indication and replacement by biosimilars, which expands the participation of biosimilars in the market significantly. Conclusion: Based on the data presented, it is concluded that it is essential to build a broader political and regulatory debate on the market for biologicals and biosimilars in the country to guarantee the access of the Brazilian population to more cost-effective technologies, generate a more competitive market and consequently contribute to the financial sustainability of health systems.
Collapse
|
8
|
Woo H, Shin G, Lee D, Kwon HY, Bae S. Is the Availability of Biosimilar Adalimumab Associated with Budget Savings? A Difference-in-Difference Analysis of 14 Countries. BioDrugs 2024; 38:133-144. [PMID: 38064144 PMCID: PMC10789825 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-023-00636-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim was to assess the influence of the presence of biosimilar adalimumab on adalimumab budget savings in 14 high- and upper-middle-income countries. METHODS This study analyzed Multinational Integrated Data Analysis System (MIDAS)-IQVIA data from the fourth quarter (Q4) of 2018 to the Q4 of 2019, comparing adalimumab expenditure (in United States dollars) and consumption (in standard units [SU]) across 14 countries (Australia, Austria, Brazil, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, and Taiwan). The countries were divided into two groups based on the availability of adalimumab biosimilars during the study period. A difference-in-difference design was employed to analyze the groups, focusing on changes from Q4 2018 to Q4 2019. Additionally, changes in adalimumab expenditure were decomposed into price, quantity, and drug mix during the study period. RESULTS Among countries with adalimumab biosimilars, there was a significant decrease in expenditure (- $371.0 per gross domestic product per capita; p = 0.03) over four quarters, while the consumption significantly increased (1.0 SU per 1000 population; p = 0.02). This was consistent with visual observations and differed from countries without adalimumab biosimilar. Sensitivity analysis with a narrowed list of countries (12 high-income countries) showed a consistent trend. Adalimumab expenditure decreased by 14% during the study period in countries where adalimumab biosimilars were available, mainly due to the price changes (Pt = 0.85; - 15%) and the drug-mix effect (εt = 0.88; - 12%). Yet, adalimumab expenditure (Et = 1.04; +4%) changed in a quantity-dependent manner (Qt = 1.06; +6%) in countries where adalimumab biosimilars were absent. CONCLUSION The availability of biosimilars was associated with a decrease in adalimumab expenditure without compromising the consumption of adalimumab.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyunjung Woo
- College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Gyeongseon Shin
- College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Donghwan Lee
- Department of Statistics, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hye-Young Kwon
- Department of Public Health, Mokwon University, Daejeon, South Korea.
| | - SeungJin Bae
- College of Pharmacy, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Santoleri F, Lasala R, Abrate P, Pestrin L, Pasut E, Modesti G, Musicco F, Fulgenzio C, Zuzolo E, Pieri G, Roperti M, Gazzola P, Gambera M, Martignoni I, Montresor V, De Vita F, Guarino F, Grossi L, Di Fabio L, Roberti C, Spoltore C, Tinari G, De Rosa S, Giannini R, Langella R, Mingolla G, Piccoli M, Costantini A. ADA_ETA_BIO2021: real-world evaluation of adherence, persistence, and cost-effectiveness of originator and biosimilar biologic drugs in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter study in Italy. Curr Med Res Opin 2023; 39:1729-1735. [PMID: 37994874 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2023.2287600] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/21/2023] [Indexed: 11/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The objective was to assess the adherence, persistence, and costs of bDMARDs through a multicentre study of nine Italian hospital pharmacies. METHODS The drugs analysed were Abatacept, Adalimumab, Certolizumab, Etanercept, Golimumab and Tocilizumab.Adult subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis were considered in the analysis.In this study, we calculated the following metrics: Adherence to treatment was evaluated as dose-intensity, which is the ratio between the amount of medication received and probably taken by the patient at home (Received Daily Dose, RDD) and the amount prescribed by the clinician (Prescribed Daily Dose, PDD). Persistence was calculated as the number of days between the first and last dispensing of the same drug. Lastly, costs were assessed based on persistence to treatment and normalized for adherence. RESULTS Adherence to treatment was found to be above 0.8 for all drugs studied. The median persistence for a 5-year treatment period was 1.4 years for Abatacept, 1.7 years for Adalimumab, 1.8 years for Certolizumab, 1.4 years for Etanercept, 1.3 years for Golimumab, and 1.6 years for Tocilizumab. CONCLUSIONS This multicentre retrospective observational study of bDMARDs used in the treatment of RA showed that, for all the drugs studied, there was no problem with adherence to treatment but rather a difficulty in maintaining treatment with the same drug over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ruggero Lasala
- Hospital Pharmacy of Corato, Local Health Unit of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | | | | | - Enrico Pasut
- Service of Pharmacy, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria del Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), Udine, Italy
| | - Germana Modesti
- Service of Pharmacy, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria del Friuli Centrale (ASUFC), Udine, Italy
| | - Felice Musicco
- San Gallicano Dermatological Institute - IRCCS, Rome Italy
| | | | - Eva Zuzolo
- San Gallicano Dermatological Institute - IRCCS, Rome Italy
| | | | | | - Pietro Gazzola
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Gambera
- "Ospedale P. Pederzoli" Casa di Cura Privata S.p.A.Via Monte Baldo
| | | | | | | | | | - Laura Grossi
- Chieti General Hospital, Via dei Vestini, Chieti Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Roberto Langella
- Pharmacy Department, Agency for Health Protection (ATS) of Milan,Italy
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jansen FM, van Linschoten RCA, Kievit W, Smits LJT, Pauwels RWM, de Jong DJ, de Vries AC, Boekema PJ, West RL, Bodelier AGL, Gisbertz IAM, Wolfhagen FHJ, Römkens TEH, Lutgens MWMD, van Bodegraven AA, Oldenburg B, Pierik MJ, Russel MGVM, de Boer NK, Mallant-Hent RC, ter Borg PCJ, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Jansen JM, Jansen SV, Tan ACITL, Hoentjen F, van der Woude CJ. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Increased Adalimumab Dose Intervals in Crohn's Disease Patients in Stable Remission: The Randomized Controlled LADI Trial. J Crohns Colitis 2023; 17:1771-1780. [PMID: 37310877 PMCID: PMC10673815 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS We aimed to assess cost-effectiveness of increasing adalimumab dose intervals compared to the conventional dosing interval in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] in stable clinical and biochemical remission. DESIGN We conducted a pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, comparing increased adalimumab intervals with the 2-weekly interval in adult CD patients in clinical remission. Quality of life was measured with the EQ-5D-5L. Costs were measured from a societal perspective. Results are shown as differences and incremental net monetary benefit [iNMB] at relevant willingness to accept [WTA] levels. RESULTS We randomized 174 patients to the intervention [n = 113] and control [n = 61] groups. No difference was found in utility (difference: -0.017, 95% confidence interval [-0.044; 0.004]) and total costs (-€943, [-€2226; €1367]) over the 48-week study period between the two groups. Medication costs per patient were lower (-€2545, [-€2780; -€2192]) in the intervention group, but non-medication healthcare (+€474, [+€149; +€952]) and patient costs (+€365 [+€92; €1058]) were higher. Cost-utility analysis showed that the iNMB was €594 [-€2099; €2050], €69 [-€2908; €1965] and -€455 [-€4,096; €1984] at WTA levels of €20 000, €50 000 and €80 000, respectively. Increasing adalimumab dose intervals was more likely to be cost-effective at WTA levels below €53 960 per quality-adjusted life year. Above €53 960 continuing the conventional dose interval was more likely to be cost-effective. CONCLUSION When the loss of a quality-adjusted life year is valued at less than €53 960, increasing the adalimumab dose interval is a cost-effective strategy in CD patients in stable clinical and biochemical remission. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03172377.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fenna M Jansen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Reinier C A van Linschoten
- Erasmus MC, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wietske Kievit
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Department for Health Evidence, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa J T Smits
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Renske W M Pauwels
- Erasmus MC, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J de Jong
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Erasmus MC, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J Boekema
- Maxima Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel L West
- Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ingrid A M Gisbertz
- Bernhoven Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank H J Wolfhagen
- Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa E H Römkens
- Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice W M D Lutgens
- Elisabeth Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A van Bodegraven
- Zuyderland Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal and Intensive Care Medicine (Co-MIK), Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Oldenburg
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke J Pierik
- Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice G V M Russel
- Medisch Spectrum Twente, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Twente, The Netherlands
| | - Nanne K de Boer
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije University Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AGEM Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter C J ter Borg
- Ikazia Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen M Jansen
- OLVG, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sita V Jansen
- Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Adrianus C I T L Tan
- Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Dane A, Klein Gebbink AS, Brugma JD, Degrassat-Théas A, Hug MJ, Houlind MB, Paubel P, van der Kuy PHM, Uyl-de Groot CA. Prices of Orphan Drugs in Four Western European Countries Before and After Market Exclusivity Expiry: A Cross-Country Comparison of List Prices and Purchase Prices. APPLIED HEALTH ECONOMICS AND HEALTH POLICY 2023; 21:905-914. [PMID: 37751107 PMCID: PMC10628053 DOI: 10.1007/s40258-023-00832-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increasing pharmaceutical expenditure challenges the sustainability and accessibility of healthcare systems across Europe. Confidentiality restraints hinder assessment of actual prices of Orphan Medicinal Products (OMPs). Hence, we assessed the real prices of brand-name OMPs around market exclusivity expiry (MEE). OBJECTIVE We aimed to explore developments in published list prices (LPs) and confidential hospital purchase prices (PPs) of brand-name OMPs relative to their market exclusivity status in Western European countries with similar GDPs. METHODS We analyzed LPs and PPs of 13 selected OMPs purchased by university hospitals in Western European countries between 2000 and 2020. For confidentially reasons, proportions were used, with the Dutch LPs of the selected OMPs at the year of MEE serving as reference values. PPs included pre-purchase discounts. Rebates were not considered. RESULTS Data were analyzed from hospitals in Denmark (DK) (n = 1), France (FR) (n = 1), Germany (DE) (n = 2), and the Netherlands (NL) (n = 1). Average LPs and PPs of included OMPs dropped gradually but limited over time, with no explicit price drop after MEE. LP levels differed more per country than PP levels: LP range before MEE was 164% (DE)-101% (FR) and after MEE was 135% (DE)-82% (FR); PP range before MEE was 150% (DE)-102% (FR) and after MEE was 107% (DE)-80% (FR). Overall differences between LPs and PPs were < 3% in all countries, except for Denmark. CONCLUSION No evident price drops of included brand-name OMPs were observed around MEE and differences in purchase prices are modest in the selected Western European countries. Results were not subject to significance testing. More robust data are needed to strengthen negotiations with suppliers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aniek Dane
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Jan-Dietert Brugma
- Department of Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Outpatient Pharmacy, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Albane Degrassat-Théas
- General Agency of Equipment and Health Products (AGEPS), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
- Health Law and Health Economics Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Health Law Institute, Inserm, UMR S 1145, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Martin J Hug
- Pharmacy, Freiburg University Medical Center, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Morten B Houlind
- Department of Clinical Research, Copenhagen University Hospital, Amager and Hvidovre, Hvidovre, Denmark
- The Capital Region Pharmacy, Herlev, Denmark
- Department of Drug Design and Pharmacology, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - P Paubel
- General Agency of Equipment and Health Products (AGEPS), Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
- Health Law and Health Economics Department, Faculty of Pharmacy, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
- Health Law Institute, Inserm, UMR S 1145, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | | | - Carin A Uyl-de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wu Q, Wang Z, Wang X, Yu H, Sun J. Patients' Perceptions of Biosimilars: A Systematic Review. BioDrugs 2023; 37:829-841. [PMID: 37676537 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-023-00620-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To systematically summarize and evaluate the findings of existing studies about patients' perceptions of biosimilars by assessing their attitudes and knowledge. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of published studies concerning patients' perceptions of biosimilars, using databases of China National Knowledge Infrastructure, SinoMed, Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers screened a total of 2197 Chinese or English papers published between 1 January 2018, and 1 October 2022. We assessed the quality of the included studies by applying the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tools. RESULTS Forty-three studies were included in the review, with the majority originating from Europe (n = 22) and North America (n = 10). Of these studies, 37 were cross-sectional quantitative studies, three were quasi-experimental studies, and the remaining three were qualitative studies based on semi-structured interviews. The sample sizes of the included studies ranged from 9 to 6554 patients. Twenty-two out of 31 studies investigating patients' acceptance of biosimilars found that most participants expressed satisfaction with treatment using biosimilars. However, doubts about the clinical effects and regulatory approval pathway could negatively influence patients' attitudes. The majority of patients understood the economic advantages of biosimilars; however, some incorrectly connected lower prices with lower quality. Patients generally lacked knowledge about biosimilars. There were 6-51% of participants who were familiar with biosimilars, and 25-58% thought they did not know enough about biosimilars. Physicians, pharmacists, medicines agencies, academia, and patient associations were identified as the main sources of information on biosimilars for patients. Healthcare providers not informing or advising patients about switching may hinder patients from acquiring enough knowledge. CONCLUSIONS The majority of patients expressed satisfaction with treatment using biosimilars, but limited knowledge continued to impede their perceptions. Doubts about the clinical effects and regulatory approval pathway were identified as major factors that negatively influenced patients' attitudes towards biosimilars, while the impact of a price advantage was mixed. It is essential to maintain a focus on educating healthcare professionals about biosimilars, including their clinical outcomes and the regulatory pathway, which equips them to provide comprehensive and informed guidance to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiyou Wu
- School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhitao Wang
- School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Wang
- School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Yu
- Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Jing Sun
- School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Everhov ÅH, Söderling J, Befrits G, Khalili H, Bröms G, Neovius M, Askling J, Halfvarson J, Ludvigsson JF, Olén O. Increasing healthcare costs in inflammatory bowel disease 2007-2020 in Sweden. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2023; 58:692-703. [PMID: 37594381 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2023] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inflammatory bowel disease has been linked to increasing healthcare costs, but longitudinal data on other societal costs are scarce. AIM To assess costs, including productivity losses, in patients with prevalent Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) in Sweden between 2007 and 2020. METHODS We linked data from national registers on all patients with CD or UC and a matched (sex, birthyear, healthcare region and education) reference population. We assessed mean costs/year in Euros, inflation-adjusted to 2020, for hospitalisations, out-patient visits, medications, sick leave and disability pension. We defined excess costs as the mean difference between patients and matched comparators. RESULTS Between 2007 and 2020, absolute mean annual societal costs in working-age (18-64 years) individuals decreased by 17% in CD (-24% in the comparators) and by 20% in UC (-27% in comparators), due to decreasing costs from sick leave and disability, a consequence of stricter sick leave regulations. Excess costs in 2007 were dominated by productivity losses. In 2020, excess costs were mostly healthcare costs. Absolute and excess costs increased in paediatric and elderly patients. Overall, costs for TNF inhibitors/targeted therapies increased by 274% in CD and 638% in UC, and the proportion treated increased from 5% to 26% in CD, and from 1% to 10% in UC. CONCLUSION Between 2007 and 2020, excess costs shifted from productivity losses to direct healthcare costs; that is, the patients' compensation for sickness absence decreased, while society increased its spending on medications. Medication costs were driven both by expanding use of TNF inhibitors and by high costs for newer targeted therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Åsa H Everhov
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jonas Söderling
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Hamed Khalili
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Gastroenterology Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Gabriella Bröms
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Gastroenterology Unit, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Neovius
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Askling
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jonas Halfvarson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine and Health, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Jonas F Ludvigsson
- Department Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pediatrics, Örebro University Hospital, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Ola Olén
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Anderson E, Waller K, Tamilarasan AG, Lin H, Paramsothy S, Leong RW. Adalimumab originator versus adalimumab biosimilars in inflammatory bowel disease in Australia. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2023; 23:819-825. [PMID: 37070385 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2023.2203812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biosimilar adalimumabs have improved treatment access, but without any clinical advantage, distributors rely on delivery device design-enhancements, support services, and removal of painful excipients to capture market share. Prescribers, however, are often unaware of these differences. This article compares and contrasts originator versus biosimilar adalimumab agents to identify key differences that might influence adalimumab selection. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We reviewed listed adalimumab biosimilars in Australia and compared them to the originator adalimumab. Similarities and differences identified were confirmed with the manufacturers via two rounds of interviews: the first to collate a list of features and benefits of their product, and the second to consolidate and confirm the data. RESULTS The originator adalimumab Humira [by AbbVie, U.S.A] and four adalimumab biosimilars (Amgevita [by Amgen, U.S.A], Hadlima [by Organon, U.S.A], Hyrimoz [by Sandoz, Switzerland], and Idacio [by Fresenius Kabi, Germany]) are included in this review. Key differences identified include product formulation, dosages available, delivery devices, physician support, patient support, and the supply of other biosimilar products by the company. CONCLUSION Adalimumab biosimilars are different from each other with unique advantages and disadvantages likely to influence prescriber and patients. Therefore, the choice of agent should be individualized to the needs of the patient and the healthcare service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilia Anderson
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Karen Waller
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Aravind Gokul Tamilarasan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Huiyu Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sudarshan Paramsothy
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Rupert W Leong
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Concord Clinical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Department of Gastroenterology, Macquarie University Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Meijboom RW, Barbier L, Druedahl LC, Sarnola K, Tolonen HM, Gardarsdottir H, Egberts TCG, Giezen TJ. Recommendations on TNFα inhibitor biosimilar use in clinical practice: a comparison of European gastroenterology IBD guidance. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2023; 23:801-817. [PMID: 36947408 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2023.2189008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Professional associations publish guidance advising gastroenterologists on prescribing biosimilars; however, guidelines differ between countries and change over time. This study aimed to map the presence and content of guidance from European gastroenterology associations on TNFα inhibitor biosimilar use and its development over time. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS Guidelines on biosimilar prescribing from national gastroenterology associations in the European Economic Area (EEA) partnered with the European Crohn's and Colitis Organization (ECCO) were collected. Treatment guidelines and biosimilar position papers from 2010 to 2022 were included. Data were extracted using a template. RESULTS 26 of 30 EEA countries have an ECCO-partnered gastroenterology association, of which 14 (53.8%) had national guidelines addressing biosimilars, four (15.4%) followed ECCO's position, and three (11.6%) had treatment guidelines without mentioning biosimilars. From five countries (19.2%) no guidelines were retrieved. Among 18 countries with guidance, 14 (77.8%) associations endorsed initiating biological treatment with biosimilars, and 13 (72.2%) endorsed transitioning from originator to biosimilar. Nine associations published multiple guidelines over time addressing biosimilars; overall, their positions became more encouraging. CONCLUSIONS The majority of gastroenterology associations endorsed biosimilar use. The lack of (up-to-date) guidelines for some associations indicates an area of improvement to support biosimilar use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosanne W Meijboom
- Pharmacy Foundation of Haarlem Hospitals, Haarlem, The Netherlands
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Liese Barbier
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Louise C Druedahl
- Centre for Advanced Studies in Biomedical Innovation Law (CeBIL), Faculty of Law, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Kati Sarnola
- Research at Kela, Social Insurance Institution of Finland (Kela), Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hanna M Tolonen
- HUS Pharmacy, HUS Helsinki University Hospital, and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Clinical Pharmacy Group, Division of Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Helga Gardarsdottir
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavík, Iceland
| | - Toine C G Egberts
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thijs J Giezen
- Pharmacy Foundation of Haarlem Hospitals, Haarlem, The Netherlands
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Spaarne Gasthuis, Haarlem and Hoofddorp, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ping Y, Jian Bo Z, Xing Yun Z, Ali K, Jun C, Xu Lou I, Wu LM. Case report: Acne vulgaris treatment with 5-Aminolaevulinic acid photodynamic therapy and adalimumab: a novel approach. Front Med (Lausanne) 2023; 10:1187186. [PMID: 37250640 PMCID: PMC10213406 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1187186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Acne vulgaris is a common skin condition that affects a large proportion of teenagers and young adults. Despite the availability of various treatment options, many patients experience inadequate relief or intolerable side effects. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a growing interest in the treatment of acne vulgaris, with 5-Aminolaevulinic acid (ALA) being one of the most commonly used photosensitizers. Adalimumab is a biologic medication used to treat inflammatory skin conditions such as Psoriasis and Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), which targets TNF-α. Combining different therapies, such as ALA-PDT and adalimumab, can often provide more effective and longer-lasting results. This report presents the case of a patient with severe and refractory acne vulgaris who was treated with a combination of ALA-PDT and adalimumab, resulting in significant improvement in the condition. The literature review highlights the significant comorbidity associated with acne, emphasizing the need for potential of TNF-α inhibitors for its effective treatments that address physical symptoms and ALA-PDT is known to treat scar hyperplasia, and to prevent or minimize the formation of post-acne hypertrophic scars. The combination of TNF inhibitors and ALA-PDT or adalimumab has shown promising results in treating inflammatory skin conditions, including severe and refractory acne vulgaris, as per recent studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yang Ping
- Department of Dermatology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhong Jian Bo
- Department of Dermatology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhao Xing Yun
- Department of Dermatology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Kamran Ali
- Department of Oncology, The Fourth Affiliated Hospital, International Institutes of Medicine, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Yiwu, China
| | - Chen Jun
- Department of Dermatology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Inmaculada Xu Lou
- Department of Cardiology, International Education College of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Li Ming Wu
- Department of Dermatology, Affiliated Hangzhou First People's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Siddiqui R, Khan NA. Patents, pharmaceutical industry and healthcare. Pharm Pat Anal 2023. [PMID: 37140356 DOI: 10.4155/ppa-2023-0009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Ruqaiyyah Siddiqui
- College of Arts & Sciences, American University of Sharjah, University City, Sharjah, 26666, UAE
- Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Istinye University, Istanbul, 34010, Turkey
| | - Naveed A Khan
- Department of Medical Biology, Faculty of Medicine, Istinye University, Istanbul, 34010, Turkey
- College of Medicine, University of Sharjah, University City, Sharjah, 27272, UAE
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wu Q, Lian Z, Wang X, Cheng H, Sun J, Yu H, Zhang G, Wu F, Liu J, Chen C. Factors associated with the uptake of biosimilars for breast cancer treatment from the perspectives of physicians and patients-Evidence from China. Front Pharmacol 2023; 13:1044798. [PMID: 36712662 PMCID: PMC9877225 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1044798] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/30/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To investigate the factors associated with the treatment of breast cancer with biosimilars from the perspectives of physicians and patients, and to generate evidence for promoting the uptake of biosimilars. Methods: This study targeted trastuzumab and its indicated human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive breast cancer and included female HER2 positive breast cancer patients under treatment of trastuzumab at a provincial oncology medical center in southern China from 1 January 2021, to 31 December 2021. The study extracted patients' demographic, socioeconomic and clinical information and the basic information of their attending physicians from the hospital information system. We performed a bivariate multiple logistic regression analysis of predictive factors of the use of trastuzumab biosimilar. Results: A total of 446 patients (aged ranging between 26 and 74, 51.4 ± 9.06) were included in the analysis, and 19.1% chose biosimilar trastuzumab. Older patients, patients enrolled in the urban and rural resident health insurance program compared with those enrolled in the urban employee health insurance program, patients who initiated treatment after January 2021 when biosimilar entered clinical use compared with those who initiated treatment before, patients with female attending physicians, younger attending physicians and with chief attending physicians compared with deputy chief attending physicians were more likely to adopt biosimilar trastuzumab for treatment (p < 05). Controlling the other factors unchanged, when the patient's attending physician was deputy chief physician, increasing 1 year age of the patient was associated with an increased probability of adopting biosimilar by .8% (dy/dx = .008, 95%CI: .002-.01, p = .01). When the patient was aged between 26 and 60, the probability of adopting biosimilar for the patient whose attending physician was a chief physician was higher than for those whose attending physician was a deputy chief physician, and the gap was the largest when the patient was at the age of 45 (dy/dx = .20, 95%CI: .13-.27, p < .01). Conclusion: The uptake rate of biosimilars is still low at its initial development stage in China. Educational policies and physicians making recommendations to the indicated patients at the initiation stage of treatment are helpful to avoid reduced willingness to switch to biosimilars due to non-clinical reasons. Patients with lower ability-to-pay will have better accessibility to biologic regimens through the uptake of biosimilars. Official guidelines and professional training are critical to enhancing physicians' willingness and confidence in adopting biosimilars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiyou Wu
- School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiwei Lian
- Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xin Wang
- School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hanchao Cheng
- School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jing Sun
- School of Health Policy and Management, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China,*Correspondence: Jing Sun,
| | - Hui Yu
- Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Gong Zhang
- Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Fan Wu
- Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Jian Liu
- Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| | - Chuanben Chen
- Clinical Oncology School of Fujian Medical University, Fujian Cancer Hospital, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Perelman J, Duarte-Ramos F, Melo Gouveia A, Pinheiro L, Ramos F, Vogler S, Mateus C. How do hospital characteristics and ties relate to the uptake of second-generation biosimilars? A longitudinal analysis of Portuguese NHS hospitals, 2015-2021. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2023; 23:99-109. [PMID: 36356294 DOI: 10.1080/14737167.2023.2146579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is limited evidence on within-country discrepancies in biosimilar uptake. This study analyzes differences in timing and diffusion of biosimilar uptake across Portuguese NHS hospitals and explores possible determinants. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS We analyzed publicly accessible consumption data of originator biologic and biosimilar drugs for adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, rituximab, and trastuzumab, by hospital and month for the years 2015-2021 (N = 9,467). We modeled the time to biosimilar adoption using survival regression models and the share of biosimilar consumption using generalized estimated equations with random hospital effects. RESULTS Academic hospitals were characterized by a quicker uptake of adalimumab and infliximab biosimilars but lower shares for other drugs. A higher total consumption of biologics was related to a lower share of biosimilar uptake. A stronger participation in randomized controlled trials was linked to higher biosimilar shares and quicker uptake, except for rituximab. If all NHS hospitals had biosimilar shares equal to the highest ones, potential annual savings could reach 13.9 million euros. CONCLUSION The findings suggest a need for capacity-building on biosimilar prescribing, including for doctors of academic hospitals and those working in settings where high biosimilar use would be expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julian Perelman
- NOVA National School of Public Health, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal.,Comprehensive Health Research Center, Nova University of Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Filipa Duarte-Ramos
- EPIUnit - Instituto de Saúde Pública, Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,Research Institute for Medicines (iMed.ULisboa), Faculty of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Portugal
| | | | - Luis Pinheiro
- Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Norte, Portugal
| | - Francisco Ramos
- NOVA National School of Public Health, Comprehensive Health Research Center, CHRC, NOVA University of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Sabine Vogler
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Pharmaceutical Pricing and Reimbursement Policies, Pharmacoeconomics Department, Austrian National Public Health Institute (Gesundheit Österreich GmbH/GÖG), Austria
| | - Céu Mateus
- Health Economics at Lancaster, Division of Health Research, Lancaster University, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kim H, Godman B, Kwon HY, Hong SH. Introduction of managed entry agreements in Korea: Problem, policy, and politics. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:999220. [PMID: 37124231 PMCID: PMC10133550 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.999220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to understand Managed Entry Agreements (MEAs) in Korea through the framework of three streams of the policy window model and its practical management and impact on pricing and reimbursement scheme. Methods: An extensive literature review based on Kingdon's model was conducted. We also performed descriptive analyses of MEA implementation using data on medicines listed in Korea and compared its MEA scheme with four different countries. Results: As per problem streams, patients with rare disease or cancers have considerable difficulties in affording their medicines and this has challenged the drug benefit system and raised an issue of patient's access. Policy streams highlighted that MEAs were introduced as a benefit enhancement plan for four major diseases since January 2014. MEAs have also been strengthened as a bypass mechanism to expand the insurance coverage especially for new premium-priced medicines under Moon Care (Listing all non-listed services). In descriptive analysis of MEAs, a total of 48 medicines were contracted as MEAs from January 2014 to December 2020, accounting for 73.4% of listed medicines for cancer or rare diseases and 97.9% of the cases were finance-based contracts. Meanwhile, outcome-based contracts such as CED accounted for only 2.1%. The application of MEAs differs across countries, resulting in a kappa coefficient of 0.00-0.14 (United Kingdom 0.03, Italy 0.00, Australia 0.14), indicating a lack of consistency compared to South Korea. Conclusion: MEAs, which were introduced as a bypass mechanism, have now superseded the standard process for anticancer agents or orphan drugs. Further studies are needed to evaluate the impact of the confidential agreements and effectiveness of new high-priced medicines with limited clinical data at launch.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyungmin Kim
- College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- National Health Insurance Service, Wonju, Republic of Korea
| | - Brian Godman
- Division of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Hye-Young Kwon
- Division of Biology and Public Health, Mokwon University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
- *Correspondence: Hye-Young Kwon, ; Song Hee Hong,
| | - Song Hee Hong
- College of Pharmacy, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- *Correspondence: Hye-Young Kwon, ; Song Hee Hong,
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hu R, Yuan T, Wang H, Zhao J, Shi L, Li Q, Zhu C, Su N, Zhang S. Efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of etanercept biosimilars versus reference biologics in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: A meta-analysis. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1089272. [PMID: 36874005 PMCID: PMC9979087 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1089272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/20/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Although with the application of etanercept biosimilars in the field of rheumatoid arthritis, the evidences of their efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity are still limited. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of etanercept biosimilars for treating active rheumatoid arthritis compared to reference biologics (Enbrel®). Methods: PubMed, Embase, Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for randomized controlled trials of etanercept biosimilars treated in adult patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis from their earliest records to 15 August 2022. The outcomes included ACR20, ACR50, and ACR70 response rate at different time points from FAS or PPS, adverse events, and proportion of patients developed anti-drug antibodies. The risk of bias of each included study was assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias in Randomised Trials tool, and the certainty of evidence was rated according to the Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Results: Six RCTs with 2432 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Etanercept biosimilars showed more benefits in ACR50 at 24 weeks from PPS [5 RCTs, OR = 1.22 (1.01, 1.47), p = 0.04, I 2 = 49%, high certainty], ACR50 at 1 year from PPS [3 RCTs, OR = 1.43 (1.10, 1.86), p < 0.01, I 2 = 0%, high certainty] or FAS [2 RCTs, OR = 1.36 (1.04, 1.78), p = 0.03, I 2 = 0%, high certainty], and ACR70 at 1 year from PPS [3 RCTs, OR = 1.32 (1.01, 1.71), p = 0.04, I 2 = 0%, high certainty]. In terms of other outcomes about efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity, the results showed that there was no significant difference between etanercept biosimilars and reference biologics, and the certainty of evidences ranged from low to moderate. Conclusion: Etanercept biosimilars showed more benefits in ACR50 response rate at 1 year than reference biologics (Enbrel®), other outcomes for clinical efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity of etanercept biosimilars were comparable with originator in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Systematic Review Registration: PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022358709.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rui Hu
- Department of Pharmacy, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay, China
| | - Tao Yuan
- Department of Pharmacy, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay, China
| | - Hui Wang
- Department of Pharmacy, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay, China
| | - Jianglin Zhao
- Department of Pharmacy, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay, China
| | - Liya Shi
- Department of Pharmacy, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay, China
| | - Quankai Li
- Department of Pharmacy, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay, China
| | - Chunmei Zhu
- Department of Pharmacy, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay, China.,Department of Nephropathy and Rheumatology, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay, China
| | - Na Su
- Department of Pharmacy, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.,West China School of Pharmacy, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Shengzhao Zhang
- Department of Pharmacy, Karamay Central Hospital, Karamay, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Garvey M. Non-Mammalian Eukaryotic Expression Systems Yeast and Fungi in the Production of Biologics. J Fungi (Basel) 2022; 8:1179. [PMID: 36354946 PMCID: PMC9692369 DOI: 10.3390/jof8111179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Revised: 11/02/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Biologics have become an important area of medical research generating therapeutics essential for the treatment of many disease states. Biologics are defined as biologically active compounds manufactured by living cells or through biological processes termed bioprocessing. Compared to small molecules which are chemically synthesised they are relatively complex and therapeutically specific molecules. Biologics include hormones, vaccines, blood products, monoclonal antibodies, recombinant therapeutic proteins, enzymes, gene and cellular therapies amongst others. For biologic production prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells (mammalian and non-mammalian) are used as expression systems. Eukaryotic expression systems offer many advantages over prokaryotic based systems. The manufacture of high-quality proteins for human clinical use via recombinant technologies has been achieved in yeast and filamentous fungal systems. Advances in bioprocessing such as genetic engineering, bioreactor design, continuous processing, and quality by design has allowed for increased productivity and higher yield in in these non-mammalian eukaryotic systems with protein translation similar to mammalian systems. The application of eukaryotic expressions systems for the manufacture of biologics of therapeutic importance are described herein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary Garvey
- Department of Life Science, Atlantic Technological University, F91 YW50 Sligo, Ireland; ; Tel.: +353-071-9305529
- Centre for Precision Engineering, Materials and Manufacturing Research (PEM), Atlantic Technological University, F91 YW50 Sligo, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Simoens S, Abdallah K, Barbier L, Lacosta TB, Blonda A, Car E, Claessens Z, Desmet T, De Sutter E, Govaerts L, Janssens R, Lalova T, Moorkens E, Saesen R, Schoefs E, Vandenplas Y, Van Overbeeke E, Verbaanderd C, Huys I. How to balance valuable innovation with affordable access to medicines in Belgium? Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:960701. [PMID: 36188534 PMCID: PMC9523170 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.960701] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Countries are struggling to provide affordable access to medicines while supporting the market entry of innovative, expensive products. This Perspective aims to discuss challenges and avenues for balancing health care system objectives of access, affordability and innovation related to medicines in Belgium (and in other countries). Methods: This Perspective focuses on the R&D, regulatory approval and market access phases, with particular attention to oncology medicines, precision medicines, orphan medicines, advanced therapies, repurposed medicines, generics and biosimilars. The authors conducted a narrative review of the peer-reviewed literature, of the grey literature (such as policy documents and reports of consultancy agencies), and of their own research. Results: Health care stakeholders need to consider various initiatives for balancing innovation with access to medicines, which relate to clinical and non-clinical outcomes (e.g. supporting the conduct of pragmatic clinical trials, treatment optimisation and patient preference studies, optimising the use of real-world evidence in market access decision making), value assessment (e.g. increasing the transparency of the reimbursement system and criteria, tailoring the design of managed entry agreements to specific types of uncertainty), affordability (e.g. harnessing the role of generics and biosimilars in encouraging price competition, maximising opportunities for personalising and repurposing medicines) and access mechanisms (e.g. promoting collaboration and early dialogue between stakeholders including patients). Conclusion: Although there is no silver bullet that can balance valuable innovation with affordable access to medicines, (Belgian) policy and decision makers should continue to explore initiatives that exploit the potential of both the on-patent and off-patent pharmaceutical markets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven Simoens
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Khadidja Abdallah
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Liese Barbier
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Alessandra Blonda
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Elif Car
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Zilke Claessens
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Thomas Desmet
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evelien De Sutter
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Laurenz Govaerts
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Rosanne Janssens
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Teodora Lalova
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
- KU Leuven Centre for IT & IP Law (CiTiP), Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evelien Moorkens
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Robbe Saesen
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
- European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Elise Schoefs
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Yannick Vandenplas
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Eline Van Overbeeke
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ciska Verbaanderd
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
- Anticancer Fund, Strombeek-Bever, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Isabelle Huys
- KU Leuven Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Allocati E, Godman B, Gobbi M, Garattini S, Banzi R. Switching Among Biosimilars: A Review of Clinical Evidence. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:917814. [PMID: 36091837 PMCID: PMC9449694 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.917814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Biological medicines have improved patients’ outcomes, but their high costs may limit access. Biosimilars, alternatives that have demonstrated high similarity in terms of quality, safety, and efficacy to an already licensed originator biological product, could increase competition and decrease prices. Given the expanding number of biosimilars, patients may switch from originator to biosimilar or among biosimilars. Randomized trials and observational studies conducted with multiple biosimilars over many disease areas confirmed the safety and efficacy of switching from originator to biosimilar. This study summarizes evidence on switching between biosimilars for which there are concerns to provide future guidance. A systematic search (MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library) for studies on anti-TNF agents, assessing clinical efficacy and safety of biosimilar-to-biosimilar switch in chronic inflammatory diseases, was performed. We retrieved 320 records and included 19 clinical studies. One study with historical control compared switching between biosimilars to maintenance of the same biosimilar. Ten were controlled cohort studies comparing switching between two biosimilars vs. switching from originator to a biosimilar or vs. multiple switches. Eight were single-arm cohort studies, where participants switched from one biosimilar to another, and the outcomes were compared before and after the switch. Overall, these studies did not highlight significant concerns in switching between biosimilars. Therefore, switching studies seem difficult to perform and unnecessary with the body of evidence suggesting no real problems in practice coupled with stringent regulatory requirements. Monitoring the use of biosimilars in clinical practice could support clinical decision-making, rational use of biological medicines, and help to further realize possible savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eleonora Allocati
- Center for Health Regulatory Policies, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research IRCCS, Milan, Italy
- *Correspondence: Eleonora Allocati,
| | - Brian Godman
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Centre of Medical and Bio-allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates
- Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Ga-Rankuwa, South Africa
| | - Marco Gobbi
- Laboratory of Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvio Garattini
- Presidency, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Rita Banzi
- Center for Health Regulatory Policies, Mario Negri Institute for Pharmacological Research IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Luukkanen SV, Tolonen HM, Airaksinen M, Saarukka LSM. The Price and Market Share Evolution of the Original Biologics and Their Biosimilars in Finland. BioDrugs 2022; 36:537-547. [PMID: 35793041 PMCID: PMC9271098 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-022-00540-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Biological drugs are generally expensive and produce a continuously growing share of drug costs. Yet they are essential in the treatment of many chronic diseases. Biosimilars, clinically equivalent to biological originator products, are expected to restrain drug costs in the biological market. Objective This study aimed to examine the impact of the biosimilar market entry on the prices of the reference products in outpatient care in Finland, investigate the impact of biosimilar market entries on price competition among biological medicinal products, and examine how the prices and market shares of outpatient biosimilars have developed in Finland during 2009–2020. Methods This retrospective register study applied data from IQVIA covering national community pharmacy wholesale data between 1 January, 2009, and 31 August, 2020, for somatropin, epoetin, filgrastim, follitropin, insulin glargine, insulin lispro, etanercept, pegfilgrastim, adalimumab, teriparatide, and enoxaparin biosimilars and their reference products, in addition to two relevant insulin products. We determined the monthly wholesale amounts in defined daily doses and wholesale weighted average prices (excluding value-added tax) per defined daily dose for each product. We analyzed the evolution of the price and market shares. We performed a linear segmented regression analysis to examine the impact of the market entry of biosimilars on the prices of reference products. Results The prices of the reference products mainly decreased after the biosimilar entered the market. If the reference product price was not reduced, it was no longer reimbursable after evaluation under the Health Insurance Act, leading to marginal market shares. The changes in the prices of biosimilars were not as remarkable as the changes in the prices of reference products after the biosimilar market entry. For most active substances, biosimilar prices were stable or decreased. The utilization of biosimilars varied widely between different active substances at the end of the observation period. Conclusions Changes in pricing policy and the public reimbursement scheme related to the market entry of biosimilars were the main reasons for the decrease in the prices of reference products. Therefore, biosimilars did not generate genuine price competition between biological products. In many of the drug groups examined, the market shares of biosimilars have growth potential in the future. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40259-022-00540-y.
Collapse
|
26
|
Luo X, Liu Q, Zhou Z, Yi L, Peng L, Wan X, Zeng X, Tan C, Li S. Cost-Effectiveness of Bevacizumab Biosimilar LY01008 Combined With Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Chinese Patients With Advanced or Recurrent Nonsquamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Front Pharmacol 2022; 13:832215. [PMID: 35517823 PMCID: PMC9062292 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.832215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether LY01008, a locally developed bevacizumab biosimilar agent, is appropriate for widespread use among Chinese advanced or recurrent nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, our current study was designed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of first-line LY01008 combined with platinum-doublet chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Material and Methods: This economic evaluation designed a Markov model to compare the healthcare cost and quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of first-line LY01008 combined with chemotherapy versus first-line chemotherapy. Transition probabilities, including disease progression, survival, and adverse event (AE)-related discontinuation of first-line treatment, were estimated using data from the clinical trials. Costs and health utilities were derived from local databases, hospitals, and published literature. Our base case analysis and scenario analysis focused on the cost-effectiveness of chemotherapy combined with a clinical trial dosage (15 mg/kg every 3-week cycle) and a real-world dosage (7.5 mg/kg every 3-week cycle) of LY01008, respectively. Results: In the base case analysis, first-line LY01008 combined with chemotherapy was associated with an increase of 0.48 QALYs in effectiveness and an increase of CNY 189,988 (US$ 26,240) in healthcare costs compared with first-line chemotherapy, resulting an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of CNY 375,425 (US$ 54,430)/QALY. In the scenario analysis, first-line LY01008 combined with chemotherapy was associated with a mean healthcare cost of CNY 265,060 (US$ 38,429), resulting an ICER of CNY 221,579 (US$ 32,125/QALY) between first-line LY01008 combined with chemotherapy versus first-line chemotherapy. The parameters that determine the cost of LY01008 have the greatest impact on the cost-effectiveness results. Conclusion: From the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system, first-line LY01008 at a real-world dosage combined with chemotherapy is likely to represent a cost-effective strategy compared with first-line chemotherapy alone for Chinese advanced or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xia Luo
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Qiao Liu
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Zhen Zhou
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, TAS, Australia
| | - Lidan Yi
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Liubao Peng
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiaomin Wan
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Xiaohui Zeng
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, PET Image Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Chongqing Tan
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Sini Li
- Department of Pharmacy, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Demirkan FG, Sönmez HE, Lamot L, Akgün Ö, Sözeri B, Ayaz NA. Embracing Change: An International Survey Study on the Beliefs and Attitudes of Pediatric Rheumatologists Towards Biosimilars. BioDrugs 2022; 36:421-430. [PMID: 35380389 DOI: 10.1007/s40259-022-00526-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biosimilars have been adopted by clinicians more slowly than anticipated in the post-marketing phase. OBJECTIVES We aimed to reveal the perceptions and attitudes of pediatric rheumatologists towards biosimilars and the obstacles to biosimilar therapy. METHODS A web-based survey designed to determine the knowledge, experience, and perceptions of pediatric rheumatologists about biosimilars was electronically mailed to the participants between April and August 2021. Responses were collected anonymously and subsequently analyzed. RESULTS A total of 114 pediatric rheumatologists including fellows (32.4%), specialists (29.8%), and seniors (37.7%) responded to the questionnaire. According to the data, 75 (65.8%) physicians had already prescribed at least one biosimilar. The vast majority of participants were aware of the potential cost savings of biosimilars (84, 73.3%). Participants who felt insufficiently informed were 41.8%, 67.6%, and 83.7% among seniors, specialists, and fellows, respectively. In pediatric rheumatology, the scarcity of clinical trials and real-life data (64%) and inadequate information about tolerance to the biosimilars and related side effects in children (49.1%) were the most common barriers expressed by prescribers. Nearly half (45%) of the pediatric rheumatologists preferred to prescribe biosimilars in the treatment of biologic-naive cases. However, most (93%) were reluctant to switch a reference molecule to a biosimilar while the patient was doing well under the originator medicine. CONCLUSIONS This survey provided insights into the concerns about prescribing biosimilars among pediatric rheumatologists. In the field of pediatric rheumatology, further education about biosimilars and real-life experiences is required to better inform about treatment options in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatma Gül Demirkan
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, İstanbul University, İstanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hafize Emine Sönmez
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, Kocaeli University, Kocaeli School of Medicine, Kocaeli, Turkey
| | - Lovro Lamot
- Department of Pediatrics, University Hospital Center, Zagreb, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Özlem Akgün
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, İstanbul University, İstanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Betül Sözeri
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, University of Health Sciences, Ümraniye Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Nuray Aktay Ayaz
- Department of Pediatric Rheumatology, İstanbul University, İstanbul School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lin I, Melsheimer R, Bhak RH, Lefebvre P, DerSarkissian M, Emond B, Lax A, Nguyen C, Wu M, Young-Xu Y. Impact of switching to infliximab biosimilars on treatment patterns among US veterans receiving innovator infliximab. Curr Med Res Opin 2022; 38:613-627. [PMID: 35125053 DOI: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2037846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare treatment patterns of United States (US) veterans stable on innovator infliximab (IFX) who switched to an IFX biosimilar (switchers) or remained on innovator IFX (continuers). METHODS US Veterans Healthcare Administration data (01/2012-12/2019) were used to identify adults with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), plaque psoriasis (PsO), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), or Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis (i.e. inflammatory bowel disease [IBD]), treated with innovator or biosimilar IFX. Index date was the first IFX biosimilar administration for switchers or a random innovator IFX administration for continuers. Patients were required to have ≥5 innovator IFX administrations during the 12 months pre-index (prevalent population). Patients with ≥12 months of observation prior to the first innovator IFX administration were analyzed as the primary population (incident population), and data were assessed from start of innovator IFX. Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to balance baseline characteristics between cohorts. Treatment patterns were evaluated post-index; continuers were censored before switching to IFX biosimilar. Discontinuation was defined as switching to another biologic (including innovator IFX) or having ≥120 days between 2 consecutive index treatment records. RESULTS In the incident population, mean [median] duration of follow-up was 737 [796] days among switchers (N = 838) and 479 [337] days among continuers (N = 849). Compared to continuers, switchers were 2.88-times more likely to discontinue index therapy (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.88, p < .001) and 4.99-times more likely to switch to another innovator biologic (HR = 4.99, p < .001). Of 653 switchers switching to another innovator biologic, 594 (91.0%) switched back to innovator IFX. Results were similar among the prevalent population and RA and IBD subgroups. CONCLUSION Patients switching from innovator to biosimilar IFX were more likely to discontinue treatment and switch to another innovator biologic (notably back to innovator IFX) than those remaining on innovator IFX; however, reasons for discontinuation and switching are unknown.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Lin
- Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC, Horsham, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Bruno Emond
- Analysis Group, Inc, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Angela Lax
- Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Melody Wu
- Analysis Group, Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Yinong Young-Xu
- White River Junction VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Karlsdottir K, Gunnarsdottir AI, Grondal G, Love TJ, Stefansdottir E, Davidsdottir LG, Thorleifsdottir RH, Gudbjornsson B. A Patients' Perspective Towards the Injection Devices for Humira® and Imraldi® in a Nationwide Switching Program. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:799494. [PMID: 35155495 PMCID: PMC8829031 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.799494] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Due to a tender process in Iceland, all patients on Humira® were switched nationwide to its biosimilar Imraldi® in March 2019. The study aimed to explore the patient's perspective of the Humira® and Imraldi® injection devices. Methods A standard telephone interview was carried out among patients with inflammatory arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis, who underwent this nationwide switching program a few months earlier. Results The response rate was 84.5% (n = 198). The average age was 50.8 years, and 53.5% were female. The patients self-administered the drugs in 96% of the cases. The majority (90.5%) stated that they received individualized instruction on using the Humira® pen, compared to 18.2% who accepted instruction in the case of the Imraldi® pen. Almost half (46.6%) of the patients found it more difficult to use the Imraldi® pen than the Humira® pen, while only 12.5% found the Imraldi® pen easier to use. Firstly, these differences were due to more painful insertion of the needle (62.2%) and secondly, due to the experience, the injection process was different (63.0%). Conclusion Patients with inflammatory disorders who have been treated regularly with adalimumab preferred the Humira® injection device over the Imraldi® device, according to our results. After all, these injection devices' structure and content are not the same, although both contain the same active ingredient, i.e. adalimumab. Our results highlight the importance of thorough information, not only with an information letter but also with the possibilities for individualized introduction in planning switching to biosimilars.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristin Karlsdottir
- Hospital Pharmacy, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
- School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
- *Correspondence: Kristin Karlsdottir
| | - Anna I. Gunnarsdottir
- Hospital Pharmacy, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
- School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Gerdur Grondal
- Centre for Rheumatology Research, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
- Department of Rheumatology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Thorvardur J. Love
- School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
- Science and Research, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | | | - Loa G. Davidsdottir
- Department of Gastroenterology, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Ragna H. Thorleifsdottir
- School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
- The Dermatology Center, Reykjavik, Iceland
| | - Bjorn Gudbjornsson
- School of Health Sciences, University of Iceland, Reykjavik, Iceland
- Centre for Rheumatology Research, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavik, Iceland
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kamusheva M, Georgieva V, Marinov L, Boncheva E, Milushewa P, Grigorova P, Marinov K, Petrova G. Volume and trends of adalimumab and pembrolizumab reimbursed market: the Bulgarian perspective. BIOTECHNOL BIOTEC EQ 2022. [DOI: 10.1080/13102818.2021.2019116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Kamusheva
- Department of Organization and Economics of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Viktoria Georgieva
- Department of Organization and Economics of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Lyubomir Marinov
- Department of Pharmacology, Pharmacotherapy and Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Elka Boncheva
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Faculty of Public Health, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Petya Milushewa
- Department of Organization and Economics of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Plamena Grigorova
- Department of Organization and Economics of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Kalin Marinov
- Department of International Economic Relations and Business, Faculty of International Economics and Politics, University of National and World Economy, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Guenka Petrova
- Department of Organization and Economics of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gisbert JP, Gaffney K, Young D, Ebbers HC, Girolomoni G. Current evidence on the use of the adalimumab biosimilar SB5 (Imraldi TM): a multidisciplinary perspective. Expert Opin Biol Ther 2021; 22:109-121. [PMID: 34918591 DOI: 10.1080/14712598.2022.2012146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This review provides an overview of data from trials and real-world studies available for SB5 (ImraldiTM) across three main therapeutic areas: rheumatology, gastroenterology, and dermatology. AREAS COVERED A literature search for publications on data for SB5 efficacy/effectiveness, safety, and immunogenicity was undertaken. EXPERT OPINION Evidence derived from clinical studies suggest that the biosimilar SB5 is a safe and effective alternative to reference adalimumab. Considering that patients suffering from immune-mediated inflammatory diseases such as inflammatory arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease and psoriasis often require long-term biologic treatment, biosimilar medicines (such as SB5) can reduce healthcare costs while increasing access to effective treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier P Gisbert
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-IP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Madrid, Spain
| | - Karl Gaffney
- Rheumatology Department, Norfolk and Norwich Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - David Young
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Giampiero Girolomoni
- Section of Dermatology and Venereology, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fusaro E, Durez P, Wohlrab J, Lee S, SangWook Yoon, Marotte H. An update on the adalimumab biosimilar landscape following the approval of the first high-concentration biosimilar. Immunotherapy 2021; 14:235-252. [PMID: 34865524 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2021-0271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Biosimilars can reduce healthcare costs and expand patient access to biologic therapies. Currently, eight adalimumab biosimilars have received regulatory approval from the EMA and/or the US FDA. Following recent EMA approval of the first high-concentration adalimumab biosimilar, CT-P17, this review provides a contemporary update on adalimumab biosimilars currently licensed in Europe and the USA. The totality of evidence from each clinical development program is summarized, and characteristics of each formulation and/or device that potentially affect the convenience of treatment for patients are discussed. Future perspectives are considered, including the potential impact of the FDA's first interchangeability designation for an adalimumab biosimilar, ahead of their entry into the US marketplace in 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Fusaro
- Rheumatology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, 10126, Torino, Italy
| | - Patrick Durez
- Rheumatology, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc - Université catholique de Louvain - Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, 1200, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Johannes Wohlrab
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, D-06120, Halle, Germany
| | - Soohyun Lee
- Celltrion Healthcare Co., Ltd., 22014, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - SangWook Yoon
- Celltrion Healthcare Co., Ltd., 22014, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hubert Marotte
- Department of Rheumatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, CIC1408, and INSERM, U1059, 42055, Saint-Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Godman B, Wladysiuk M, McTaggart S, Kurdi A, Allocati E, Jakovljevic M, Kalemeera F, Hoxha I, Nachtnebel A, Sauermann R, Hinteregger M, Marković-Peković V, Tubic B, Petrova G, Tachkov K, Slabý J, Nejezchlebova R, Krulichová IS, Laius O, Selke G, Langner I, Harsanyi A, Inotai A, Jakupi A, Henkuzens S, Garuolienė K, Gulbinovič J, Bonanno PV, Rutkowski J, Ingeberg S, Melien Ø, Mardare I, Fürst J, MacBride-Stewart S, Holmes C, Pontes C, Zara C, Pedrola MT, Hoffmann M, Kourafalos V, Pisana A, Banzi R, Campbell S, Wettermark B. Utilisation Trend of Long-Acting Insulin Analogues including Biosimilars across Europe: Findings and Implications. BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL 2021; 2021:9996193. [PMID: 34676266 PMCID: PMC8526244 DOI: 10.1155/2021/9996193] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diabetes mellitus rates and associated costs continue to rise across Europe enhancing health authority focus on its management. The risk of complications is enhanced by poor glycaemic control, with long-acting insulin analogues developed to reduce hypoglycaemia and improve patient convenience. There are concerns though with their considerably higher costs, but moderated by reductions in complications and associated costs. Biosimilars can help further reduce costs. However, to date, price reductions for biosimilar insulin glargine appear limited. In addition, the originator company has switched promotional efforts to more concentrated patented formulations to reduce the impact of biosimilars. There are also concerns with different devices between the manufacturers. As a result, there is a need to assess current utilisation rates for insulins, especially long-acting insulin analogues and biosimilars, and the rationale for patterns seen, among multiple European countries to provide future direction. Methodology. Health authority databases are examined to assess utilisation and expenditure patterns for insulins, including biosimilar insulin glargine. Explanations for patterns seen were provided by senior-level personnel. RESULTS Typically increasing use of long-acting insulin analogues across Europe including both Western and Central and Eastern European countries reflects perceived patient benefits despite higher prices. However, activities by the originator company to switch patients to more concentrated insulin glargine coupled with lowering prices towards biosimilars have limited biosimilar uptake, with biosimilars not currently launched in a minority of European countries. A number of activities were identified to address this. Enhancing the attractiveness of the biosimilar insulin market is essential to encourage other biosimilar manufacturers to enter the market as more long-acting insulin analogues lose their patents to benefit all key stakeholder groups. CONCLUSIONS There are concerns with the availability and use of insulin glargine biosimilars among European countries despite lower costs. This can be addressed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Godman
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK
- Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Magdalene Wladysiuk
- Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Medical College, Jagiellonian University, Krakow, Poland
- HTA Consulting, Starowiślna Str. 17/3, 31-038 Krakow, Poland
| | - Stuart McTaggart
- Public Health Scotland, Gyle Square, 1 South Gyle Crescent, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Amanj Kurdi
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK
- Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
| | - Eleonora Allocati
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche ‘Mario Negri' IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Mihajlo Jakovljevic
- Department of Global Health Economics and Policy, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
- Institute of Comparative Economic Studies, Faculty of Economics, Hosei University Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Francis Kalemeera
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Policy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia
| | - Iris Hoxha
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine, Tirana, Albania
| | - Anna Nachtnebel
- Dachverband der Österreichischen Sozialversicherungen, Kundmanngasse 21, AT-1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Robert Sauermann
- Dachverband der Österreichischen Sozialversicherungen, Kundmanngasse 21, AT-1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Manfred Hinteregger
- Dachverband der Österreichischen Sozialversicherungen, Kundmanngasse 21, AT-1030 Vienna, Austria
| | - Vanda Marković-Peković
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Social Pharmacy, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Biljana Tubic
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Agency for Medicinal Product and Medical Devices of Bosnia and Herzegovina, 78000 Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Guenka Petrova
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Social Pharmacy and Pharmacoeconomics, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Konstantin Tachkov
- Faculty of Pharmacy, Department of Social Pharmacy and Pharmacoeconomics, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Juraj Slabý
- State Institute for Drug Control, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | - Iva Selke Krulichová
- Department of Medical Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University, Simkova 870, 500 03 Hradec Králové, Czech Republic
| | - Ott Laius
- State Agency of Medicines, Nooruse 1, 50411 Tartu, Estonia
| | - Gisbert Selke
- Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK (WIdO), Rosenthaler Straße 31, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - Irene Langner
- Wissenschaftliches Institut der AOK (WIdO), Rosenthaler Straße 31, 10178 Berlin, Germany
| | - András Harsanyi
- Department of Health Policy and Health Economics, Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - András Inotai
- Syreon Research Institute and Semmelweis University, Center of Health Technology Assessment, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Arianit Jakupi
- Faculty of Pharmacy, UBT Higher Education Institute, Pristina, Kosovo
| | | | - Kristina Garuolienė
- Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Jolanta Gulbinovič
- Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Patricia Vella Bonanno
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK
- Department of Health Services Management, University of Malta, Valletta, Malta
| | - Jakub Rutkowski
- HTA Consulting, Starowiślna Str. 17/3, 31-038 Krakow, Poland
| | - Skule Ingeberg
- Medicines Committee, Oslo University Hospitals, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Melien
- Medicines Committee, Oslo University Hospitals, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ileana Mardare
- Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Management Department, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 050463 Bucharest, Romania
| | - Jurij Fürst
- Health Insurance Institute, Miklosiceva 24, SI-1507 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | | | - Caridad Pontes
- Drug Department, Catalan Health Service, Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, 08007 Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Corinne Zara
- Drug Department, Catalan Health Service, Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, 08007 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Marta Turu Pedrola
- Drug Department, Catalan Health Service, Gran Via de les Corts Catalanes, 08007 Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Vasileios Kourafalos
- National Organization for the Provision of Healthcare Services (EOPYY), Athens, Greece
| | - Alice Pisana
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rita Banzi
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche ‘Mario Negri' IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Stephen Campbell
- Centre for Primary Care and Health Services Research, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Bjorn Wettermark
- Department of Pharmacy, Disciplinary Domain of Medicine and Pharmacy, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Haque M, Islam S, Kamal ZM, Akter F, Jahan I, Rahim MSA, Sultana N, Alam AM, Halim-Khan MA, Deeba F, Bakar MA, Nahar S, Mozaffor M, Urmi UL, Saikat TR, Islam MZ, Haque M, Iqbal S, Hossain MM, Naher N, Allocati E, Godman B. Ongoing efforts to improve the management of patients with diabetes in Bangladesh and the implications. Hosp Pract (1995) 2021; 49:266-272. [PMID: 33734004 DOI: 10.1080/21548331.2021.1906083] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prevalence rates of patients with diabetes are growing across countries, and Bangladesh is no exception. Associated costs are also increasing, driven by costs associated with the complications of diabetes including hypoglycemia. Long-acting insulin analogues were developed to reduce hypoglycemia as well as improve patient comfort and adherence. However, they have been appreciably more expensive, reducing their affordability and use. Biosimilars offer a way forward. Consequently, there is a need to document current prescribing and dispensing rates for long-acting insulin analogues across Bangladesh, including current prices and differences, as a result of affordability and other issues. METHODS Mixed method approach including surveying prescribing practices in hospitals coupled with dispensing practices and prices among community pharmacies and drug stores across Bangladesh. This method was adopted since public hospitals only dispense insulins such as soluble insulins free-of-charge until funds run out and all long-acting insulin analogues have to be purchased from community stores. RESULTS There has been growing prescribing and dispensing of long-acting insulins in Bangladesh in recent years, now accounting for over 80% of all insulins dispensed in a minority of stores. This increase has been helped by growing prescribing and dispensing of biosimilar insulin glargine at lower costs than the originator, with this trend likely to continue with envisaged growth in the number of patients. Consequently, Bangladesh can serve as an exemplar to other low- and middle-income countries struggling to fund long-acting insulin analogues for their patients. CONCLUSIONS It was encouraging to see continued growth in the prescribing and dispensing of long-acting insulin analogues in Bangladesh via the increasing availability of biosimilars. This is likely to continue benefitting all key stakeholder groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mainul Haque
- Unit of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Defence Health, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (National Defence University of Malaysia), Malaysia
| | - Salequl Islam
- Department of Microbiology, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Bangladesh
| | | | - Farhana Akter
- Department of Endocrinology, Chittagong Medical College, Chattogram, Bangladesh
| | - Iffat Jahan
- Department of Physiology, Eastern Medical College, Cumilla, Bangladesh
| | | | - Nusrat Sultana
- Department of Endocrinology & Metabolism, Bangabandhu Sheik Mujib Medical University Hospital, Shahbag, Bangladesh
| | | | - M A Halim-Khan
- Shaheed Suhrawardy Medical College and Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Farzana Deeba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bangabandhu Sheik Mujib Medical University (BSMMU) Hospital, Shahbag, Bangladesh
| | - Muhammed Abu Bakar
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Chattogram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College, Chattogram, Bangladesh
| | - Shamsun Nahar
- Department of Microbiology, Jahangirnagar University, Savar, Bangladesh
| | - Miliva Mozaffor
- Department of Biochemistry, Medical College for Women & Hospital, Uttara, Bangladesh
| | | | - Taohidur Rahman Saikat
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Tejgaon College, National University of Bangladesh, Dhaka 1215, Bangladesh
| | - Md Zakirul Islam
- Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Eastern Medical College, Cumilla, Bangladesh
| | - Monami Haque
- Human Resource Department, Square Toiletries Limited, Rupayan Center, Bangladesh
| | | | | | - Nurun Naher
- Department of Anatomy, Ad-din Women's Medical College, Dhaka, Bangladesh
- Instituto Di Ricerche Farmacologiche 'Mario Negri' IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Brian Godman
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
- Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Godman B, Fadare J, Kwon HY, Dias CZ, Kurdi A, Dias Godói IP, Kibuule D, Hoxha I, Opanga S, Saleem Z, Bochenek T, Marković-Peković V, Mardare I, Kalungia AC, Campbell S, Allocati E, Pisana A, Martin AP, Meyer JC. Evidence-based public policy making for medicines across countries: findings and implications for the future. J Comp Eff Res 2021; 10:1019-1052. [PMID: 34241546 DOI: 10.2217/cer-2020-0273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim: Global expenditure on medicines is rising up to 6% per year driven by increasing prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) and new premium priced medicines for cancer, orphan diseases and other complex areas. This is difficult to sustain without reforms. Methods: Extensive narrative review of published papers and contextualizing the findings to provide future guidance. Results: New models are being introduced to improve the managed entry of new medicines including managed entry agreements, fair pricing approaches and monitoring prescribing against agreed guidance. Multiple measures have also successfully been introduced to improve the prescribing of established medicines. This includes encouraging greater prescribing of generics and biosimilars versus originators and patented medicines in a class to conserve resources without compromising care. In addition, reducing inappropriate antibiotic utilization. Typically, multiple measures are the most effective. Conclusion: Multiple measures will be needed to attain and retain universal healthcare.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Godman
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy & Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, SE-141 86, Stockholm, Sweden
- School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| | - Joseph Fadare
- Department of Pharmacology & Therapeutics, Ekiti State University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria
- Department of Medicine, Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria
| | - Hye-Young Kwon
- Division of Biology and Public Health, Mokwon University, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Carolina Zampirolli Dias
- Graduate Program in Public Health, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil
| | - Amanj Kurdi
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy & Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK
- School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
| | - Isabella Piassi Dias Godói
- Institute of Health & Biological Studies - Universidade Federal do Sul e Sudeste do Pará, Avenida dos Ipês, s/n, Cidade Universitária, Cidade Jardim, Marabá, Pará, Brazil
- Researcher of the Group (CNPq) for Epidemiological, Economic and Pharmacological Studies of Arboviruses (EEPIFARBO) - Universidade Federal do Sul e Sudeste do Pará; Avenida dos Ipês, s/n, Cidade Universitária, Cidade Jardim, Marabá, Pará, Brazil
| | - Dan Kibuule
- Department of Pharmacy Practice & Policy, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia
| | - Iris Hoxha
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine Tirana, Albania
| | - Sylvia Opanga
- Department of Pharmaceutics & Pharmacy Practice, School of Pharmacy, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Zikria Saleem
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Tomasz Bochenek
- Department of Nutrition & Drug Research, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Vanda Marković-Peković
- Department of Social Pharmacy, University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Medicine, Banja Luka, Republic of Srpska, Bosnia & Herzegovina
| | - Ileana Mardare
- "Carol Davila" University of Medicine & Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania
| | | | - Stephen Campbell
- Centre for Primary Care, Division of Population Health, Health Services Research & Primary Care, University of Manchester, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
- NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre, School of Health Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Eleonora Allocati
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche 'Mario Negri' IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alice Pisana
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Antony P Martin
- Faculty of Health & Life Sciences, The University of Liverpool, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool, L69 3BX, UK
| | - Johanna C Meyer
- School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Tubic B, Marković-Peković V, Jungić S, Allocati E, Godman B. Availability and accessibility of monoclonal antibodies in Bosnia and Herzegovina: Findings and implications. MEDICINE ACCESS @ POINT OF CARE 2021; 5:23992026211027692. [PMID: 36204505 PMCID: PMC9413607 DOI: 10.1177/23992026211027692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) represent the most numerous and significant
group of biotherapeutics. While mAbs have undoubtedly improved treatment for
many chronic diseases, including inflammatory diseases, they are typically
expensive for health care systems and patients. Consequently, access to mAbs
has been a problem for many patients especially among Central and Eastern
European (CEE) countries. However, biosimilars can potentially help with
costs, although there are concerns with their effectiveness and safety. This
includes biosimilars for long-acting insulin analogues. Aim: Assess the availability and use of biological medicines, including
biosimilars within Bosnia and Herzegovina (B&H). Methods: Assess the availability of mAbs via the current lists of approved and
accessed mAbs versus those licenced in Europe and the United States and
their utilisation, as well as specifically insulin glargine and its
biosimilars, within B&H. Results: The availability of the mAbs in B&H appears satisfactory, which is
encouraging. However, current usage is limited to a few mAbs which is a
concern for subsequent patient care especially with limited use of
biosimilars to address issues of affordability. We also see limited use of
biosimilar insulin glargine. Conclusion The limited use of mAbs including biosimilars needs to be addressed in
B&H to improve the future care of patients within finite resources. We
will monitor these developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Biljana Tubic
- Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Vanda Marković-Peković
- Department of Social Pharmacy, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Saša Jungić
- University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
- University Clinical Centre of Republic of Srpska, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Eleonora Allocati
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche ‘Mario Negri’ IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Brian Godman
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
- Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Godman B, Haque M, Leong T, Allocati E, Kumar S, Islam S, Charan J, Akter F, Kurdi A, Vassalo C, Bakar MA, Rahim SA, Sultana N, Deeba F, Khan MAH, Alam ABMM, Jahan I, Kamal ZM, Hasin H, Munzur-E-Murshid, Nahar S, Haque M, Dutta S, Abhayanand JP, Kaur RJ, Rwegerera GM, do Nascimento RCRM, Dias Godói IP, Irfan M, Amu AA, Matowa P, Acolatse J, Incoom R, Sefah IA, Acharya J, Opanga S, Njeri LW, Kimonge D, Kwon HY, Bae S, Khuan KKP, Abubakar AR, Sani IH, Khan TA, Hussain S, Saleem Z, Malande OO, Piloya-Were T, Gambogi R, Hernandez Ortiz C, Alutuli L, Kalungia AC, Hoxha I, Marković-Peković V, Tubic B, Petrova G, Tachkov K, Laius O, Harsanyi A, Inotai A, Jakupi A, Henkuzens S, Garuoliene K, Gulbinovič J, Wladysiuk M, Rutkowski J, Mardare I, Fürst J, McTaggart S, MacBride-Stewart S, Pontes C, Zara C, Tagoe ET, Banzi R, Wale J, Jakovljevic M. The Current Situation Regarding Long-Acting Insulin Analogues Including Biosimilars Among African, Asian, European, and South American Countries; Findings and Implications for the Future. Front Public Health 2021; 9:671961. [PMID: 34249838 PMCID: PMC8264781 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.671961] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Diabetes mellitus rates continue to rise, which coupled with increasing costs of associated complications has appreciably increased global expenditure in recent years. The risk of complications are enhanced by poor glycaemic control including hypoglycaemia. Long-acting insulin analogues were developed to reduce hypoglycaemia and improve adherence. Their considerably higher costs though have impacted their funding and use. Biosimilars can help reduce medicine costs. However, their introduction has been affected by a number of factors. These include the originator company dropping its price as well as promoting patented higher strength 300 IU/ml insulin glargine. There can also be concerns with different devices between the manufacturers. Objective: To assess current utilisation rates for insulins, especially long-acting insulin analogues, and the rationale for patterns seen, across multiple countries to inform strategies to enhance future utilisation of long-acting insulin analogue biosimilars to benefit all key stakeholders. Our approach: Multiple approaches including assessing the utilisation, expenditure and prices of insulins, including biosimilar insulin glargine, across multiple continents and countries. Results: There was considerable variation in the use of long-acting insulin analogues as a percentage of all insulins prescribed and dispensed across countries and continents. This ranged from limited use of long-acting insulin analogues among African countries compared to routine funding and use across Europe in view of their perceived benefits. Increasing use was also seen among Asian countries including Bangladesh and India for similar reasons. However, concerns with costs and value limited their use across Africa, Brazil and Pakistan. There was though limited use of biosimilar insulin glargine 100 IU/ml compared with other recent biosimilars especially among European countries and Korea. This was principally driven by small price differences in reality between the originator and biosimilars coupled with increasing use of the patented 300 IU/ml formulation. A number of activities were identified to enhance future biosimilar use. These included only reimbursing biosimilar long-acting insulin analogues, introducing prescribing targets and increasing competition among manufacturers including stimulating local production. Conclusions: There are concerns with the availability and use of insulin glargine biosimilars despite lower costs. This can be addressed by multiple activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian Godman
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
- School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, George Town, Malaysia
| | - Mainul Haque
- Unit of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine and Defence Health, Universiti Pertahanan Nasional Malaysia (National Defence University of Malaysia), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Trudy Leong
- Essential Drugs Programme, South African National Department of Health, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Eleonora Allocati
- Center for Health Regulatory Policies, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri” IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Santosh Kumar
- Department of Periodontology and Implantology, Karnavati University, Gandhinagar, India
| | - Salequl Islam
- Department of Microbiology, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Jaykaran Charan
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India
| | - Farhana Akter
- Department of Endocrinology, Chittagong Medical College, Chittagong, Bangladesh
| | - Amanj Kurdi
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
- Division of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
| | - Carlos Vassalo
- Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad Nacional del Litoral, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | - Muhammed Abu Bakar
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Chattogram Maa-O-Shishu Hospital Medical College, Chattogram, Bangladesh
| | - Sagir Abdur Rahim
- Bangladesh Institute of Research and Rehabilitation in Diabetes, Endocrine and Metabolic Disorders General Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Nusrat Sultana
- Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Bangabandhu Sheik Mujib Medical University Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Farzana Deeba
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Bangabandhu Sheik Mujib Medical University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | | | | | - Iffat Jahan
- Department of Physiology, Eastern Medical College, Cumilla, Bangladesh
| | | | - Humaira Hasin
- Clinical Fellow, Epsom and St Helier University Hospitals NHS Trust, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | - Munzur-E-Murshid
- Women's Integrated Sexual Health (WISH) 2 Access Choice Together Innovate Ownership Now (ACTION) Project, Handicap International, Kurigram, Bangladesh
| | - Shamsun Nahar
- Department of Microbiology, Jahangirnagar University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Monami Haque
- Human Resource Department, Square Toiletries Limited, Rupayan Center, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Siddhartha Dutta
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India
| | | | - Rimple Jeet Kaur
- Department of Pharmacology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Jodhpur, India
| | - Godfrey Mutashambara Rwegerera
- Department of Medicine, Sir Ketumile Masire Teaching Hospital, Gaborone, Botswana
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Botswana, Gaborone, Botswana
| | | | - Isabella Piassi Dias Godói
- Institute of Health and Biological Studies, Universidade Federal do Sul e Sudeste do Pará, Cidade Universitária, Marabá, Brazil
- Group (CNPq) for Epidemiological, Economic and Pharmacological Studies of Arboviruses (EEPIFARBO), Universidade Federal do Sul e Sudeste do Pará, Marabá, Brazil
| | - Mohammed Irfan
- Faculdade de Odontologia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil
| | - Adefolarin A. Amu
- Pharmacy Department, Eswatini Medical Christian University, Mbabane, Eswatini
| | - Patrick Matowa
- Pharmacy Department, Eswatini Medical Christian University, Mbabane, Eswatini
| | | | - Robert Incoom
- Cape Coast Teaching Hospital (CCTH), Cape Coast, Ghana
| | - Israel Abebrese Sefah
- Pharmacy Department, Keta Municipal Hospital, Ghana Health Service, Keta-Dzelukope, Ghana
- Pharmacy Practise Department of Pharmacy Practise, School of Pharmacy, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Volta Region, Ghana
| | | | - Sylvia Opanga
- Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacy Practise, School of Pharmacy, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | | | - David Kimonge
- Department of Pharmaceutics and Pharmacy Practise, School of Pharmacy, University of Nairobi, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Hye-Young Kwon
- Division of Biology and Public Health, Mokwon University, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - SeungJin Bae
- College of Pharmacy, Ewha Woman's University, Seoul, South Korea
| | | | - Abdullahi Rabiu Abubakar
- Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Bayero University, Kano, Nigeria
| | - Ibrahim Haruna Sani
- Unit of Pharmacology, College of Health Sciences, Yusuf Maitama Sule University (YUMSUK), Kano, Nigeria
| | | | | | - Zikria Saleem
- Department of Pharmacy Practise, Faculty of Pharmacy, The University of Lahore, Lahore, Pakistan
| | - Oliver Ombeva Malande
- Department of Child Health and Paediatrics, Egerton University, Nakuru, Kenya
- East Africa Centre for Vaccines and Immunisation (ECAVI), Kampala, Uganda
| | - Thereza Piloya-Were
- Paediatric Endocrinologist, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
| | | | | | - Luke Alutuli
- University Teaching Hospital Group, Department of Pharmacy, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | - Iris Hoxha
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Medicine, Tirana, Albania
| | - Vanda Marković-Peković
- Department of Social Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Biljana Tubic
- Agency for Medicinal Products and Medical Devices of Bosnia and Herzegovina, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Department of Medicinal Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Banja Luka, Banja Luka, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Guenka Petrova
- Department of Social Pharmacy and Pharmacoeconomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Konstantin Tachkov
- Department of Social Pharmacy and Pharmacoeconomics, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Sofia, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | - Ott Laius
- State Agency of Medicines, Tartu, Estonia
| | - András Harsanyi
- Department of Health Policy and Health Economics, Eotvos Lorand University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - András Inotai
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
- Center of Health Technology Assessment, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Arianit Jakupi
- Faculty of Pharmacy, UBT Higher Education Institute, Pristina, Kosovo
| | | | - Kristina Garuoliene
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Jolanta Gulbinovič
- Department of Pathology, Forensic Medicine and Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania
| | - Magdalene Wladysiuk
- Chair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine Jagiellonian University, Medical College, Kraków, Poland
- HTA Consulting, Kraków, Poland
| | | | - Ileana Mardare
- Faculty of Medicine, Public Health and Management Department, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania
| | - Jurij Fürst
- Health Insurance Institute, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | | | - Caridad Pontes
- Drug Department, Catalan Health Service, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Pharmacology, Therapeutics and Toxicology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Corinne Zara
- Drug Department, Catalan Health Service, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eunice Twumwaa Tagoe
- Department of Management Science, Business School, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Rita Banzi
- Center for Health Regulatory Policies, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche “Mario Negri” IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Janney Wale
- Independent Consumer Advocate, Brunswick, VIC, Australia
| | - Mihajlo Jakovljevic
- Department of Global Health Economics and Policy, University of Kragujevac, Kragujevac, Serbia
- Faculty of Economics, Institute of Comparative Economic Studies, Hosei University Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Kennedy C, Smith A, O’Brien E, Rice J, Barry M. Prescribers’ knowledge of drug costs: a contemporary Irish study. DRUGS & THERAPY PERSPECTIVES 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40267-021-00830-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
39
|
Off-Patent Biologicals and Biosimilars Tendering in Europe-A Proposal towards More Sustainable Practices. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14060499. [PMID: 34073861 PMCID: PMC8225063 DOI: 10.3390/ph14060499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Revised: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: In Europe, off-patent biologicals and biosimilars are largely procured by means of tender procedures. The organization and design of tenders may play a key role in the evolving biosimilar market, and currently, it is not fully elucidated how tenders for off-patent biologicals and biosimilars are designed and if approaches are aligned with sustaining market competition and societal savings for healthcare systems over the long term. This study aims to (i) explore the design and implementation of tender procedures for off-patent biologicals and biosimilars in Europe, (ii) identify learnings for sustainable tender approaches from purchasers and suppliers, and (iii) formulate recommendations in support of competitive and sustainable tender practices in the off-patent biologicals market. Methods: A mixed methods design was applied. A quantitative web-survey was conducted with hospital pharmacists and purchasers (N = 60, of which 47 completed the survey in full), and qualitative expert-interviews with purchasers and suppliers (N = 28) were carried out. Results: The web survey results showed that the organization and design of tenders for off-patent biologicals and biosimilars, and the experience of hospital pharmacists and purchasers with this, considerably varies on several elements across European countries. From the qualitative interviews, signals emerged across the board that some of the current tender approaches might negatively affect market dynamics for off-patent biologicals and biosimilars. The focus on generating short-term savings and existence of originator favouring tender practices were identified as elements that may limit timely competition from and market opportunity for biosimilar suppliers. The need to optimize tender processes, considering a more long-term strategic and sustainable view, was expressed. In addition, challenges appear to exist with differentiating between products beyond price, showing the need and opportunity to guide stakeholders with the (appropriate) inclusion of award criteria beyond price. Due to the variety in tender organization in Europe, a ‘one size fits all’ tendering framework is not possible. However, on an overarching level, it was argued that tender procedures must aim to (i) ensure market plurality and (ii) include award criteria beyond price (warranted that criteria are objectively and transparently defined, scored and competitively rewarded). Depending on the market (maturity), additional actions may be needed. Conclusions: Findings suggest the need to adjust tender procedures for off-patent biologicals and biosimilars, considering a more long-term strategic and market sustainable view. Five main avenues for optimization were identified: (i) safeguarding a transparent, equal opportunity setting for all suppliers with an appropriate use of award criteria; (ii) fostering a timely opening of tender procedures, ensuring on-set competition; (iii) ensuring and stimulating adherence to laws on public procurement; (iv) securing an efficient process, improving plannability and ensuring timely product supply and (v) safeguarding long-term sustainable competition by stimulating market plurality.
Collapse
|
40
|
Azuz S, Newton M, Bartels D, Poulsen BK. Uptake of biosimilar trastuzumab in Denmark compared with other European countries: a comparative study and discussion of factors influencing implementation and uptake of biosimilars. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 77:1495-1501. [PMID: 34008071 PMCID: PMC8440249 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-021-03155-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to describe the implementation and uptake of biosimilar trastuzumab in Denmark compared with other European countries. METHODS European data for usage of trastuzumab was supplied by IQVIA™, using the MIDAS® dataset. A comparison was performed based on market share estimated in sales volume. A separate comparison was undertaken between countries with a full two-fold switch between different biosimilars. Data was collected spanning the time from first registered sales of biosimilar trastuzumab until the 1st quarter of 2020. RESULTS Denmark had the fastest and most thorough uptake of biosimilar trastuzumab compared with other EU countries. After 3 months, the market share of biosimilar trastuzumab had increased to 90% while the second fastest country had a 50% market share after 3 months. Only two other countries had undergone a full second switch between biosimilars, Hungary and Norway. All of the three countries made near complete switches between biosimilars while only Denmark had reduced the use of biooriginator below 10%. CONCLUSION The implementation of biosimilar trastuzumab in Denmark was rapid and achieved high overall uptake compared with other EU countries. The switch from one biosimilar to another was also achieved quickly and thoroughly. We believe that the rapid dissemination of information and involvement of all stakeholders - administrators, pharmacies, prescribers, nurses, and patients - constitute the backbone of the Danish success. A similar strategy is recommend for biosimilar implementation in other countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Azuz
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Aalborg University Hospital, Mølleparkvej 4 8a, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.
| | - Max Newton
- Global Supplier & Association Relations, IQVIA, London, UK
| | - Dorthe Bartels
- Amgros - The Regions' Pharmaceutical Organisation, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Vandenplas Y, Simoens S, Van Wilder P, Vulto AG, Huys I. Off-Patent Biological and Biosimilar Medicines in Belgium: A Market Landscape Analysis. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:644187. [PMID: 33953678 PMCID: PMC8091126 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.644187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and objective: Best-value biological medicines may generate competition in the off-patent biologicals market, resulting in having more resources available to provide patients with access to necessary medicines while maintaining high-quality care. Belgium is a country known to have low biosimilar market shares, suggesting a malfunctioning market for off-patent biologicals. This study aims to gain an in-depth understanding of the Belgian off-patent biologicals market, by looking at the evolution in volumes and costs of the relevant products in the market. Methods: This study included a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods. The quantitative part of this study consisted of the analysis of market data obtained by the National Institute for Health and Disability Insurance (NIHDI) for all relevant products in the Belgian off-patent biologicals market (i.e. TNF-inhibitors, insulins, granulocyte colony-stimulating factors, epoetins, rituximab, trastuzumab). In addition, for the qualitative part of this study, semi-structured interviews with Belgian stakeholders were conducted between December 2019 and March 2020. Results: Belgian market data and stakeholder perceptions suggest a suboptimal market environment for off-patent biological and biosimilar medicines. Shifts are observed after loss of exclusivities of originator biologicals toward second-generation products or new therapeutic class products, at a higher cost and often limited added value. Moreover, cost reductions for off-patent biologicals after biosimilar market entry are mainly determined by mandatory price reductions applicable to both originator and biosimilar products, and not by lower prices induced by competition. For products used in the retail setting, significant mandatory price reductions for both originator and reference products with low biosimilar volumes were pointed out as the main reasons for the lack of price competition. For products dispensed in hospitals, the hospital financing system is important. First, it does not always encourage the use of lower cost alternatives. Second, competition mainly takes place at the level of confidential discounts in tenders. Most interviewees acknowledged the lack of a competitive environment, which is not supportive of a sustainable Belgian off-patent biologicals market. Conclusion: Market data and stakeholder perceptions indicate that the sustainability of the Belgian market for off-patent biologicals is challenged. A sustainable market ensures access to biological therapies now and in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yannick Vandenplas
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Steven Simoens
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Philippe Van Wilder
- Ecole de Santé Publique, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Arnold G Vulto
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Hospital Pharmacy, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Isabelle Huys
- Department of Pharmaceutical and Pharmacological Sciences, Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|