Menstruation-Related Disorders—Dysmenorrhea and Heavy Bleeding—as Significant Epiphenomena in Women With Rheumatic Diseases

Recurrence of Uterine Fibroids After Conservative Surgery or Radiological Procedures: a Narrative Review

The present narrative review aims to discuss the available data on the incidence and the risk factors of uterine fibroids (UFs) recurrence after different types of conservative surgical or radiologic procedures in women wishing to preserve their uterus. UFs are the most common benign tumors in women all over the world. Clinical presentation, including abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB), pelvic pain, bulky symptoms, and infertility affect patients' quality of life, and a large variety of conservative treatments are available especially for those with desire of pregnancy. Fertility sparing surgery, by either laparoscopy, hysteroscopy or laparotomy, or radiological interventions (uterine artery embolization, high-intensity focused ultrasound or magnetic resonance-guided focused ultrasound), are the most common therapeutic approaches. However, the genetic or acquired predisposition to UFs remain despite the treatments, and the recurrences are frequently described in a large percentage of patients. The most relevant risk factors for recurrence of UFs are young age at the first surgery, incomplete fibroid resection, the presence of multiple lesions, an enlarged uterus, and the coexistence with other pelvic diseases. The discussion on the possible medical strategy to reduce the recurrence is an open field of clinical investigation, in particular by using hormonal drugs.

Comprehensive reproductive healthcare for women with immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: Addressing rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis and inflammatory bowel disease through life's stages

Immuno-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) such as rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, and inflammatory bowel disease are characterised by pathophysiological mechanisms wherein the immune system erroneously targets the body's own tissues. This review explores the heightened vulnerability of women with IMIDs, influenced by hormonal modulators like estrogen and progesterone. The challenges this poses are multifaceted, encompassing the impact of active disease and medical treatments throughout life stages, including family planning, fertility, and menopause. From the perspectives of rheumatologists and gastroenterologists, we review current management strategies and underscore the need for a multidisciplinary and life-cycle approach to healthcare for women with IMIDs.

Development and initial validation of the menstrual sensitivity index

OBJECTIVE

The present study sought to develop and perform the initial validation of a scale assessing sensitivity to menstrual pain and symptoms.

METHODS

Data were taken from a larger parent study in which participants were recruited from a nationwide sample of individuals via the UniVox platform (www.univoxcommunity.com). In that study, participants were stratified by age and self-reported menstrual pain. Participants in the parent study completed 2 online surveys, one at baseline and one at a 3-month follow up. Participants who provided complete responses to the potential scale items, as well as a variety of validated questionnaires, were included in the present analyses. Final item selection was determined by factor analyses, and measures of validity and reliability were examined.

RESULTS

Factor analyses support an 8-item scale assessing menstrual sensitivity. This scale, the Menstrual Sensitivity Index, demonstrates excellent internal consistency, good item-total correlations, and good total score test-retest reliability. Convergent validity emerged for menstrual- and pain-specific measures, and divergent validity emerged for anxiety sensitivity, anxiety, depression, nonmenstrual bodily pain, and premenstrual symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Menstrual sensitivity is a unique construct that reflects women's attunement to and fear of menstrual symptoms, and the Menstrual Sensitivity Index is a valid and reliable measure of this construct. This scale could be useful in advancing research and clinical work targeting menstrual pain.

Nursing interventions for patients with rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases on biological therapies: a systematic literature review

Investigating unmet needs and identifying the necessary interventions for patients affected by rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) may help significantly to ensure the continuity and quality of the chronic care pathway. To this aim, the contribution of rheumatology nurses requires further evidence. The aim of our systematic literature review (SLR) was to identify the nursing interventions directed towards patients with RMDs undergoing biological therapy. To retrieve data, a search was carried out in the MEDLINE database, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL database), the APA PsycINFO database and the Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE) from 1990 to 2022. The systematic review was carried out in accordance with the relevant PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria were as follows: (I) adult patients with RMDs, (II) undergoing therapy with Biological Disease-Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (bDMARDs), (III) original and quantitative research papers in English with available abstract, (IV) specific to nursing interventions and/or outcomes. Two independent reviewers screened the identified records for eligibility according to their title and abstract, full texts were subsequently assessed and, finally, data was extracted. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tools were used to evaluate the quality of the studies included. Among the 2348 records retrieved, 13 articles met the inclusion criteria. These consisted of six randomised controlled trials (RCTs), one pilot study and six observational studies on RMDs. In a total population of 2004 patients, 43% (862/2004) of the cases concerned rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and 56% (1122/2004) of the cases concerned spondyloarthritis (SpA). Three major nursing interventions were identified, namely education, patient-centred care and data collection/nurse monitoring, which were correlated with high satisfaction rates regarding care, increased self-care capacity and treatment adherence among patients. All interventions followed a protocol defined in collaboration with rheumatologists. The large degree of heterogeneity in the interventions did not allow the performance of a meta-analysis. Rheumatology nurses are part of a multidisciplinary team caring for patients with RMDs. Following an accurate initial nursing evaluation, rheumatology nurses can plan and standardise their interventions focusing primarily on patient education and personalised care based on actual needs, such as psychological well-being and disease control. However, the training for rheumatology nurses should define and standardise, as much as possible, the competencies required for the detection of disease parameters. Key Points • This SLR provides an overview of nursing interventions for patients with RMDs. • This SLR considers the specific population of patients on biological therapies. • Training for rheumatology nurses should standardise, as much as possible, the knowledge and methods required for detecting disease parameters. • This SLR highlights the various competencies of rheumatology nurses.

Endometrial gene expression differences in women with coronavirus disease 2019

OBJECTIVE

To study the potential effect of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on the endometrial transcriptome of affected, symptomatic women for the detection of altered gene expression.

DESIGN

Pilot study of the endometrial transcriptomes of women manifesting COVID-19 compared with those of women without COVID-19 undergoing hysteroscopic procedures for benign gynecologic disorders using RNA sequencing.

SETTING

Hospital and university laboratories.

PATIENT(S)

Women with (n = 14) and without a COVID-19 (n = 10) diagnosis based on a nasopharyngeal swab analysis using quantitative reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. The endometrium of the patients with COVID-19 had previously been tested for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection, revealing the absence of the virus in this tissue.

INTERVENTION(S)

Endometrial biopsy sample collection.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURE(S)

Endometrial gene expression and functional analysis of symptomatic patients with COVID-19 vs. individuals without the infection.

RESULT(S)

The systemic disease COVID-19 altered endometrial gene expression in 75% of the women, with the patients exhibiting a preponderance of 163 up-regulated (e.g., UTS2, IFI6, IFIH1, and BNIP3) and 72 down-regulated genes (e.g., CPZ, CDH3, and IRF4) (false discovery rate<0.05). A total of 161 dysregulated functions (36 up-regulated and 125 down-regulated) were typically enriched in the endometria of the patients with COVID-19, including up-regulation in pathways involved in the development of immune responses to viruses and cytokine inflammation, reflecting elicitation of a COVID-19 response pathway.

CONCLUSION(S)

Coronavirus disease 2019 affects endometrial gene expression despite the absence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 RNA in endometrial tissues.