Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Patients With Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review and meta-Analysis of Current Evidence in Randomized Controlled Trials

Updates on Common Mononeuropathies

This article provides an overview of the most common mononeuropathies. It includes a description of the neuroanatomy and function of each nerve which allows clinical localization of the lesion. It also describes the clinical presentation, findings in electrodiagnostic studies, updates in imaging including neuromuscular ultrasound and magnetic resonance neurography, and recommended treatment. While mononeuropathies may be part of polyneuropathy, this scenario is beyond the scope of this article. The most common mononeuropathy is carpal tunnel syndrome. Its prevalence in the United States is estimated at 50 per 1,000. The second most common entrapment neuropathy is ulnar neuropathy at the elbow. The incidence was calculated as 20.9% in a 2005 study. The most common compressive neuropathy of the lower extremity is peroneal neuropathy. Other common mononeuropathies included in this article are radial neuropathy, tibial neuropathy, and femoral neuropathy.

Platelet-rich plasma for de Quervain’s tenosynovitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection is used as an alternative non-operative management for de Quervain’s tenosynovitis (DQT) to regenerate tendon healing.

AIM

To assess and conclude the research-based study systematically to analyse the efficacy of PRP on DQT.

METHODS

This systematic review used the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews and the guideline of preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis. A systematic literature search was applied to 11 databases. The authors assessed the study quality and risk of bias of each included study. Results of the meta-analysis were presented using mean difference (MD)/standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

The authors evaluated 275 studies found in the literature search; 12 studies met the criteria for this review, and then the study quality and risk of bias were assessed. Pooled analysis of data from two studies involving 194 subjects with DQT showed that, compared with conservative treatment, PRP injection was associated with a greater reduction in visual analog scale pain in one month and six months after treatment (MD: -0.67, P value < 0.00001; MD: -1.16, P value < 0.00001) and the increase of Mayo’s wrist score in one month and six months after treatment (SMD: 3.72, P value < 0.00001; SMD: 4.44, P value < 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

PRP can be used as an alternative non-operative treatment for DQT due to the tissue regenerative effect of PRP.

Injection therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Various injectants are available for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. This systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different injection therapies in alleviating the symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome. Various databases were searched for relevant studies from inception until May 10, 2023. Eligible studies were identified using the patient (P), intervention (I), comparison (C), and outcomes (O) model, which involved (P) participants with carpal tunnel syndrome, (I) an intervention based on injection therapy, (C) the use of placebo or another injectant as a control treatment, and (O) the measurement of clinical and electrodiagnostic outcomes of interest. A total of 18 studies were included in the analysis. The network meta-analysis revealed that platelet-rich plasma is effective in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome in terms of symptom and pain relief and functional improvement in both the short and long term, whereas steroids are effective only in the short term. Additionally, injections of dextrose solution may offer long-term pain relief as well as short- and long-term symptom alleviation and functional improvement. The study findings suggest that platelet-rich plasma should be used as the first-line treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome, with dextrose and steroids serving as alternative treatment options.

Current Status and Advancements in Platelet-Rich Plasma Therapy

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a treatment modality has been around for the last four decades, but only truly gained popularity over the last 10 to 15 years in medicine, in a variety of fields ranging from regenerative medicine to infertility treatment. It has gained popularity, especially in treating musculoskeletal conditions where the bulk of research has been performed and published. There is level I evidence available supporting its efficacy in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA), epicondylitis, bursitis, compressive neuropathy, plantar fasciitis, muscular injuries and osteochondral lesions. Most published research with regards to PRP has been focused on knee OA (limited research in shoulder, elbow, and foot and ankle OA), lateral epicondylitis and carpal tunnel syndrome, whereas spinal and hand conditions have limited research available. Tendinopathies and partial tendon tears have conflicting evidence available, with level I evidence supporting PRP's use in rotator cuff tendinopathies and tears, with contradictory level I evidence discouraging its use in patella and Achilles tendinopathies and tears. The available evidence regarding the use of PRP continues to produce conflicting results, but despite this, there is an ongoing increase in the popularity and use of PRP in patients with musculoskeletal conditions.

Local injection therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trial

Objective: Clinical research has shown that local injections for carpal tunnel syndrome reduce the symptoms of patients and enhance their quality of life considerably. However, there are several therapy options, and the optimal choice of regimen remains uncertain. Therefore, we comprehensively evaluated the variations in clinical efficacy and safety of several medications for treating carpal tunnel syndrome. Methods: Computer searches of Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were used to collect articles of randomized controlled trials on local injections for treating carpal tunnel syndrome from database creation till 10 June 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted information, evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies, and performed network Meta-analysis using Stata 17.0 software. Drug efficacy was assessed using symptom severity/function and pain intensity. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) ranking was used to determine the advantage of each therapy. Results: We included 26 randomized controlled trials with 1896 wrists involving 12 interventions, such as local injections of corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, 5% dextrose, progesterone, and hyaluronidase. The results of the network meta-analysis showed the following: (i) symptom severity: at the 3-month follow-up, D5W combined with splinting (SUCRA = 95%) ranked first, and hyaluronidase (SUCRA = 89.6%) at 6 months; (ii) functional severity: either at the 3-month follow-up (SUCRA = 89.5%) or 6 months (SUCRA = 83.6%), iii) pain intensity: 5% dextrose in water combined with splinting was the most effective at the 3-month (SUCRA = 85%) and 6-month (SUCRA = 87.6%) follow-up. Conclusion: Considering the combination of symptoms/function and pain intensity, combining 5% dextrose in water with splinting is probably the treatment of choice for patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. It is more effective than glucocorticoids and no adverse effects have been observed. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022370525.

Comparison of femoral neck system versus cannulated screws for treatment of femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recently, some studies on the efficacy of the femoral neck system (FNS) in treating femoral neck fractures (FNFs) have been published. Therefore, a systematic review was performed to clarify the efficacy and safety of FNS versus cannulated screws (CS) for the treatment of FNFs.

METHOD

The PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were systematically searched for studies comparing FNS and CS fixations in FNFs. Intraoperative indicators, postoperative clinical indicators, postoperative complications, and postoperative scores were compared between the implants.

RESULTS

A total of eight studies were included in the study, involving 448 FNFs patients. The results showed that patients in FNS group were significantly lower than the CS group in the number of X-ray exposures (WMD = -10.16; 95% CI, -11.44 to -8.88; P < 0.001; I² = 0%), fracture healing time (WMD = -1.54; 95% CI, -2.38 to -0.70; P < 0.001; I² = 92%), length of femoral neck shortening (WMD = -2.01; 95% CI, -3.11 to -0.91; P < 0.001; I² = 0%), femoral head necrosis (OR = 0.27; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.83; P = 0.02; I² = 0%), implant failure/cutout (OR = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.82; P = 0.02; I² = 0%), and Visual Analog Scale Score (WMD = -1.27; 95% CI, -2.51 to -0.04; P = 0.04; I² = 91%). And the Harris Score was significantly higher in the FNS group than in the CS group (WMD = 4.15; 95% CI, 1.00 to 7.30; P = 0.01; I² = 89%).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on this meta-analysis, FNS shows better clinical efficacy and safety in treating FNFs compared to CS. However, due to the limited quality and number of included studies and the high heterogeneity of the meta-analysis; large samples and multicenter RCTs are needed to confirm this conclusion in the future.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II, Systematic review and Meta-analysis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42021283646.

Multiple Injections of Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Hyaluronic Acid for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Current Evidence in Randomized Controlled Trials

In recent years, various clinical trials have focused on treating knee osteoarthritis (KOA) with multiple injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP). However, compared with the multiple hyaluronic acid (m-HA) injections, the clinical efficacy of multiple PRP (m-PRP) injections for KOA still remains controversial among these studies. Therefore, we aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness of m-PRP injections with m-HA injections in the treatment of KOA in this systematic review. Relevant clinical trials were searched via bibliographic databases, including Medline, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, to compare the m-PRP and m-HA injections in the treatment of KOA. Finally, fourteen randomized controlled trials, including 1512 patients, showed the postoperative VAS, WOMAC, IKDC, or EQ-VAS scores and were enrolled in this systematic review. Compared with the group of intra-articular m-HA injections, the group of intra-articular m-PRP injections was lower in the VAS scores at 3-month (WMD = −0.25; 95%CI, −0.40 to −0.10, p = 0.0009) and 12-month (WMD = −0.64; 95%CI, −0.79 to −0.49, p < 0.00001) follow-ups. In addition, the group of intra-articular m-PRP injections was also lower in the WOMAC scores at 1-month (WMD = −1.23; 95%CI, −2.17 to −0.29, p = 0.01), 3-month (WMD = −5.34; 95%CI, −10.41 to −0.27, p = 0.04), 6-month (WMD = −11.02; 95%CI, −18.09 to −3.95, p = 0.002), and 12-month (WMD = −7.69; 95%CI, −12.86 to −2.52, p = 0.004) follow-ups. Furthermore, compared with the group of intra-articular m-HA injections, the group of intra-articular m-PRP injections was higher in the IKDC scores at 3-month (WMD = 7.45; 95%CI, 2.50 to 12.40, p = 0.003) and 6-month (WMD = 5.06; 95%CI, 1.94 to 8.18, p = 0.001) follow-ups. However, the long-term adverse side of m-PRP injections for KOA still needs more large-scale trials and long-term follow-ups.

Traumatic Humeral Shaft Non-union With Ulnar Nerve Transection: An Orthobiologics Success Story

Long bone non-union is a detrimental, yet common condition that affects many individuals after injury. It can lead to significant pain and weakness that may impact lifetime productivity and quality of life. This report describes a patient who suffered from greater than two years of a distal humerus fracture non-union along with an ulnar nerve transection that failed traditional surgical management and underwent a percutaneous injection with bone marrow aspirate concentrate, platelet-rich plasma, and platelet lysate, demonstrating subsequent fracture resolution and strength improvement.

Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid for patients with intertrochanteric fractures treated with intramedullary fixation: A systematic review and meta-analysis of current evidence in randomized controlled trials

Background: Tranexamic acid (TXA) has been widely applied to reduce perioperative bleeding. Recently, several studies focused on the administration of TXA in the treatment for with intertrochanteric fracture patients treated with intramedullary fixation. However, the efficacy and safety of TXA in these studies remain controversial. Therefore, we performed this systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the efficacy and safety of TXA in intertrochanteric fracture patients treated with intramedullary fixation.

Methods: We systematically searched electronic databases, including Cochrane, PubMed, and EMBASE, up to 16 May 2022. The efficacy and safety of TXA was evaluated in four aspects, which were bleeding-related outcomes, non-bleeding-related outcomes, thromboembolic events, and other complications. The outcomes of these studies were extracted and analyzed by RevMan Manager 5.4.

Results: Finally, nine randomized controlled trials, involving nine hundred and seventy-two intertrochanteric fracture patients treated with TXA, were enrolled in this study. In the bleeding-related outcomes, TXA group was significantly lower than the control group in terms of total blood loss (MD = −219.42; 95% CI, −299.80 to −139.03; p &lt; 0.001), intraoperative blood loss (MD = −36.81; 95% CI, −54.21 to −19.41; p &lt; 0.001), hidden blood loss (MD = −189.23; 95% CI, −274.92 to −103.54; p &lt; 0.001), and transfusion rate (RR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.49 to 0.85; p = 0.002). Moreover, the postoperative hemoglobin on day 3 of the TXA group was significantly higher than that of the control group (MD = 5.75; 95% CI, 1.26 to 10.23; p = 0.01). In the non-bleeding-related outcomes, the length of hospital stays was significantly shorter in the TXA group (MD = −0.67; 95% CI, −1.12 to −0.23; p = 0.003). In terms of thromboembolic events, there was no significant differences between the TXA group and control group in deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, myocardial infarction, and ischemic stroke. As for complications and mortality, there was no significant differences between the TXA group and control group in respiratory infection, renal failure, and postoperative mortality within 1 year.

Conclusion: TXA is an effective and safe drug for perioperative bleeding control in intertrochanteric fracture patients treated with intramedullary fixation. However, the long-term efficacy of TXA still needs to be investigated by large-scale multicenter randomized controlled trials.

Level of evidence: II, Systematic review and Meta-analysis.

Systematic Review Registration:https://inplasy.com/, identifier [INPLASY202280027]