Safety of HIF prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors for anemia in dialysis patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

A patent review on hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) modulators (2021-2023)

INTRODUCTION

Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) is a central regulatory factor in detecting and adapting to cellular oxygen stress. Dysregulation of HIF is associated with various human diseases. Seven HIF modulators, including six prolyl hydroxylase (PHD) inhibitors and one HIF-2α inhibitor, have already been approved for the treatment of renal anemia and cancer, respectively.

AREAS COVERED

This review summarizes HIF modulators patented in the 2021-2023 period. This review provides an overview of HIF downregulators, including HIF-1α inhibitors, HIF-2α inhibitors, and HIF-2α degraders, as well as HIF upregulators, including PHD, FIH, and VHL inhibitors, and HIF-2α and HIF-3α agonists.

EXPERT OPINION

Efforts should be made to address the adverse clinical effects associated with approved HIF-modulating drugs, including PHD inhibitors and HIF-2α inhibitors. Identification of the specific buried cavity in the HIF-2α and an opened pocket in HIF-3α offer an avenue for designing novel modulators for HIF-2α or HIF-3α. Given the similarities observed in the binding cavities of HIF-2α and HIF-3α, it should be considered whether the approved HIF-2α inhibitors also inhibit HIF-3α. A comprehensive understanding of the HIF signaling pathway biology would lead to the development of novel small-molecule HIF modulators as innovative therapeutic approaches for a wide range of human diseases.

Consensus commentary and position of the Italian Society of Nephrology on KDIGO controversies conference on novel anemia therapies in chronic kidney disease

Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are new drugs developed for the treatment of anemia associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD). This class of drugs stimulates endogenous erythropoietin production and, at the same time, improves iron absorption and mobilization of iron stores (less evident with daprodustat, vadadustat and enarodustat). Several studies have been published in the last few years showing that these agents are not inferior to standard therapy in correcting anemia associated with CKD. The efficacy of HIF-PHIs is coupled with a safety profile comparable to that of standard erythropoiesis stimulating agent (ESA) treatment. However, studies with HIF-PHIs were not long enough to definitively exclude the impact of new drugs on adverse events, such as cancer, death and possibly cardiovascular events, that usually occur after a long follow-up period. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) recently reported the conclusions of the Controversies Conference on HIF-PHIs held in 2021. The goal of the present position paper endorsed by the Italian Society of Nephrology is to better adapt the conclusions of the latest KDIGO Conference on HIF-PHIs to the Italian context by reviewing the efficacy and safety of HIF-PHIs as well as their use in subpopulations of interest as emerged from more recent publications not discussed during the KDIGO Conference.

Comparison of outcomes on hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) in anaemia associated with chronic kidney disease: network meta-analyses in dialysis and non-dialysis dependent populations

Background

Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are oral alternatives to current standard-of-care treatments for anaemia in chronic kidney disease (CKD). We conducted network meta-analyses to indirectly compare clinical outcomes for three HIF-PHIs in dialysis and non-dialysis populations with anaemia in CKD.

Methods

The evidence base comprised phase III, randomised, controlled trials evaluating daprodustat, roxadustat, or vadadustat. Three outcomes were evaluated: efficacy [change from baseline in haemoglobin (Hgb)], cardiovascular safety [time to first major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE)] and quality of life [change from baseline in 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Vitality score]. Analyses were performed separately for all patients and for erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) non-users at baseline (non-dialysis population) or prevalent dialysis patients (dialysis population). Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods with non-informative priors were used to estimate the posterior probability distribution and generate pairwise treatment comparisons. Point estimates (medians of posterior distributions) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) were calculated.

Results

Seventeen trials were included. In non-dialysis patients, there were no clinically meaningful differences between the three HIF-PHIs with respect to Hgb change from baseline [all patients analysis (total n = 7907): daprodustat vs. roxadustat, 0.09 g/dL (95% CrI -0.14, 0.31); daprodustat vs. vadadustat, 0.09 g/dL (-0.04, 0.21); roxadustat vs. vadadustat, 0.00 g/dL (-0.22, 0.22)] or risk of MACE [all patients analysis (total n = 7959): daprodustat vs. roxadustat, hazard ratio (HR) 1.16 (95% CrI 0.76, 1.77); daprodustat vs. vadadustat, 0.88 (0.71, 1.09); roxadustat vs. vadadustat, 0.76 (0.50, 1.16)]. Daprodustat showed a greater increase in SF-36 Vitality compared with roxadustat [total n = 4880; treatment difference 4.70 points (95% CrI 0.08, 9.31)]. In dialysis patients, Hgb change from baseline was higher with daprodustat and roxadustat compared with vadadustat [all patients analysis (total n = 11 124): daprodustat, 0.34 g/dL (0.22, 0.45); roxadustat, 0.38 g/dL (0.27, 0.49)], while there were no clinically meaningful differences in the risk of MACE between the HIF-PHIs [all patients analysis (total n = 12 320): daprodustat vs. roxadustat, HR 0.89 (0.73, 1.08); daprodustat vs. vadadustat, HR 0.99 (0.82, 1.21); roxadustat vs. vadadustat, HR 1.12 (0.92, 1.37)]. Results were similar in analyses of ESA non-users and prevalent dialysis patients.

Conclusions

In the setting of anaemia in CKD, indirect treatment comparisons suggest that daprodustat, roxadustat, and vadadustat are broadly clinically comparable in terms of efficacy and cardiovascular safety (precision was low for the latter), while daprodustat may be associated with reduction in fatigue to a greater extent than roxadustat.

Hypoxia-induced signaling in the cardiovascular system: pathogenesis and therapeutic targets

Hypoxia, characterized by reduced oxygen concentration, is a significant stressor that affects the survival of aerobic species and plays a prominent role in cardiovascular diseases. From the research history and milestone events related to hypoxia in cardiovascular development and diseases, The "hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs) switch" can be observed from both temporal and spatial perspectives, encompassing the occurrence and progression of hypoxia (gradual decline in oxygen concentration), the acute and chronic manifestations of hypoxia, and the geographical characteristics of hypoxia (natural selection at high altitudes). Furthermore, hypoxia signaling pathways are associated with natural rhythms, such as diurnal and hibernation processes. In addition to innate factors and natural selection, it has been found that epigenetics, as a postnatal factor, profoundly influences the hypoxic response and progression within the cardiovascular system. Within this intricate process, interactions between different tissues and organs within the cardiovascular system and other systems in the context of hypoxia signaling pathways have been established. Thus, it is the time to summarize and to construct a multi-level regulatory framework of hypoxia signaling and mechanisms in cardiovascular diseases for developing more therapeutic targets and make reasonable advancements in clinical research, including FDA-approved drugs and ongoing clinical trials, to guide future clinical practice in the field of hypoxia signaling in cardiovascular diseases.