Honey Bee Parasitic Mite Contains the Sensilla-Rich Sensory Organ on the Foreleg Tarsus Expressing Ionotropic Receptors With Conserved Functions

Arthropod repellent interactions with olfactory receptors and ionotropic receptors analyzed by molecular modeling

The main insect chemoreceptors are olfactory receptors (ORs), gustatory receptors (GRs) and ionotropic receptors (IRs). The odorant binding sites of many insect ORs appear to be occluded and inaccessible from the surface of the receptor protein, based on the three-dimensional structure of OR5 from the jumping bristletail Machilis hrabei (MhraOR5) and a survey of a sample of vinegar fly (Drosophila melanogaster) OR structures obtained from artificial intellegence (A.I.) modeling. Molecular dynamics simulations revealed that the occluded site can become accessible through tunnels that transiently open and close. The present study extends this analysis to examine seventeen ORs and one GR docking with ligands that have known valence: nine that signal attraction and nine that signal aversion. All but one of the receptors displayed occluded ligand binding sites analogous to MhraOR5, and docking software predicted the known attractant and repellent ligands will bind to the occluded sites. Docking of the repellent DEET was examined, and more than half of the OR ligand sites were predicted to bind DEET, including receptors that signal aversion as well as those that signal attraction. However, DEET may not actually have access to all the attractant binding sites. The larger size and lower flexibility of repellent molecules may restrict their passage through the tunnel bottlenecks, which could act as filters to select access to the ligand binding sites. In contrast to ORs and GRs, the IR ligand binding site is in an extracellular domain known to undergo a large conformational change from an open to a closed state. A.I. models of two D. melanogaster IRs of known valence and two blacklegged tick (Ixodes scapularis) IRs having unknown ligands were computationally tested for attractant and repellent binding. The ligand-binding sites in the closed state appear inaccessible to the protein surface, so attractants and repellents must bind initially at an accessible site in the open state before triggering the conformational change. In some IRs, repellent binding sites were identified at exterior sites adjacent to the ligand-binding site. These may be allosteric sites that, when occupied by repellents, can stabilize the open state of an attractant IR, or stabilize the closed state of an IR in the absence of its activating ligand. The model of D. melanogaster IR64a suggests a possible molecular mechanism for the activation of this IR by H+. The amino acids involved in this proposed mechanism are conserved in IR64a from several Dipteran pest species and disease vectors, potentially offering a route to discovery of new repellents that act via the allosteric site.

Effects of Niemann-Pick type C2 (NPC2) gene transcripts silencing on behavior of Varroa destructor and molecular changes in the putative olfactory gene networks

To understand the role of two Niemann-Pick type C2 (NPC2) transcripts, Vd40090 (NP1) and Vd74517 (NP5), in the chemosensing pathway of Varroa destructor, we evaluated the impact of NP5 silencing on mites behavior and compared the effect of silencing of either transcripts on the interaction between chemosensory transcripts. In contrast to silencing NP1, which reduced feeding and reproduction by the mite (Nganso et al., 2021), silencing of NP5 reduced significantly the host reaching ability, but it did not affect the feeding on nurse bee. However, silencing of either transcript changed dramatically the co-expression patterns among the putative chemosensory genes, binding proteins and receptors. The results suggest the role of gustatory receptors in the detection of long-range chemical cues in the chemosensory cascade of the Varroa mite.

Comparative Genomics Reveals Insights into the Divergent Evolution of Astigmatic Mites and Household Pest Adaptations

Highly diversified astigmatic mites comprise many medically important human household pests such as house dust mites causing ∼1–2% of all allergic diseases globally; however, their evolutionary origin and diverse lifestyles including reversible parasitism have not been illustrated at the genomic level, which hampers allergy prevention and our exploration of these household pests. Using six high-quality assembled and annotated genomes, this study not only refuted the monophyly of mites and ticks, but also thoroughly explored the divergence of Acariformes and the diversification of astigmatic mites. In monophyletic Acariformes, Prostigmata known as notorious plant pests first evolved, and then rapidly evolving Astigmata diverged from soil oribatid mites. Within astigmatic mites, a wide range of gene families rapidly expanded via tandem gene duplications, including ionotropic glutamate receptors, triacylglycerol lipases, serine proteases and UDP glucuronosyltransferases. Gene diversification after tandem duplications provides many genetic resources for adaptation to sensing environmental signals, digestion, and detoxification in rapidly changing household environments. Many gene decay events only occurred in the skin-burrowing parasitic mite Sarcoptes scabiei. Throughout the evolution of Acariformes, massive horizontal gene transfer events occurred in gene families such as UDP glucuronosyltransferases and several important fungal cell wall lytic enzymes, which enable detoxification and digestive functions and provide perfect drug targets for pest control. This comparative study sheds light on the divergent evolution and quick adaptation to human household environments of astigmatic mites and provides insights into the genetic adaptations and even control of human household pests.

The Structure and Function of Ionotropic Receptors in Drosophila

Ionotropic receptors (IRs) are a highly divergent subfamily of ionotropic glutamate receptors (iGluR) and are conserved across Protostomia, a major branch of the animal kingdom that encompasses both Ecdysozoa and Lophothrochozoa. They are broadly expressed in peripheral sensory systems, concentrated in sensory dendrites, and function in chemosensation, thermosensation, and hygrosensation. As iGluRs, four IR subunits form a functional ion channel to detect environmental stimuli. Most IR receptors comprise individual stimulus-specific tuning receptors and one or two broadly expressed coreceptors. This review summarizes the discoveries of the structure of IR complexes and the expression and function of each IR, as well as discusses the future direction for IR studies.

Comparative morphological and transcriptomic analyses reveal chemosensory genes in the poultry red mite, Dermanyssus gallinae

Detection of chemical cues via chemosensory receptor proteins are essential for most animals, and underlies critical behaviors, including location and discrimination of food resources, identification of sexual partners and avoidance of predators. The current knowledge of how chemical cues are detected is based primarily on data acquired from studies on insects, while our understanding of the molecular basis for chemoreception in acari, mites in particular, remains limited. The poultry red mite (PRM), Dermanyssus gallinae, is one of the most important blood-feeding ectoparasites of poultry. PRM are active at night which suck the birds' blood during periods of darkness and hide themselves in all kinds of gaps and cracks during the daytime. The diversity in habitat usage, as well as the demonstrated host finding and avoidance behaviors suggest that PRM relies on their sense of smell to orchestrate complex behavioral decisions. Comparative transcriptome analyses revealed the presence of candidate variant ionotropic receptors, odorant binding proteins, niemann-pick proteins type C2 and sensory neuron membrane proteins. Some of these proteins were highly and differentially expressed in the forelegs of PRM. Rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors were also identified, while insect-specific odorant receptors and odorant co-receptors were not detected. Furthermore, using scanning electron microscopy, the tarsomeres of all leg pairs were shown to be equipped with sensilla chaetica with or without tip pores, while wall-pored olfactory sensilla chaetica were restricted to the distal-most tarsomeres of the forelegs. This study is the first to describe the presence of chemosensory genes in any Dermanyssidae family. Our findings make a significant step forward in understanding the chemosensory abilities of D. gallinae.