Long Peritoneal Dialysis Dwells With Icodextrin: Kinetics of Transperitoneal Fluid and Polyglucose Transport

High Osmol Gap Hyponatremia Caused by Icodextrin: A Case Series Report

Recently, hyperosmolar hyponatremia following excessive off-label use of two exchanges of 2 L icodextrin daily during peritoneal dialysis (PD) was reported. We encountered a cluster of 3 cases of PD patients who developed hyperosmolar hyponatremia during on-label use of icodextrin. This appeared to be due to absorption of icodextrin since after stopping icodextrin, the serum sodium level and osmol gap returned to normal, while a rechallenge again resulted in hyperosmolar hyponatremia. We excluded higher than usual concentrations of specific fractions of dextrins in fresh icodextrin dialysis fluid (lot numbers of used batches were checked by manufacturer). We speculate that in our patients, either an exaggerated degradation of polysaccharide chains by α-amylase activity in dialysate, lymph, and interstitium and/or rapid hydrolysis of the absorbed larger degradation products in the circulation may have contributed to the hyperosmolality observed, with the concentration of oligosaccharides exceeding the capacity of intracellular enzymes (in particular maltase) to metabolize these products to glucose. Both hyponatremia and hyperosmolality are risk factors for poor outcomes in PD patients. Less conventional PD prescriptions such as off-label use of two exchanges of 2 L icodextrin might raise the risk of this threatening side effect. This brief report is intended to create awareness of a rare complication of on-label icodextrin use in a subset of PD patients and/or PD prescriptions.

Modelling of icodextrin hydrolysis and kinetics during peritoneal dialysis

In peritoneal dialysis, ultrafiltration is achieved by adding an osmotic agent into the dialysis fluid. During an exchange with icodextrin-based solution, polysaccharide chains are degraded by α-amylase activity in dialysate, influencing its osmotic properties. We modelled water and solute removal taking into account degradation by α-amylase and absorption of icodextrin from the peritoneal cavity. Data from 16 h dwells with icodextrin-based solution in 11 patients (3 icodextrin-exposed, 8 icodextrin-naïve at the start of the study) on dialysate volume, dialysate concentrations of glucose, urea, creatinine and α-amylase, and dialysate and blood concentrations of seven molecular weight fractions of icodextrin were analysed. The three-pore model was extended to describe hydrolysis of icodextrin by α-amylase. The extended model accurately predicted kinetics of ultrafiltration, small solutes and icodextrin fractions in dialysate, indicating differences in degradation kinetics between icodextrin-naïve and icodextrin-exposed patients. In addition, the model provided information on the patterns of icodextrin degradation caused by α-amylase. Modelling of icodextrin kinetics using an extended three-pore model that takes into account absorption of icodextrin and changes in α-amylase activity in the dialysate provided accurate description of peritoneal transport and information on patterns of icodextrin hydrolysis during long icodextrin dwells.

Factors related to ultrafiltration volume with icodextrin dialysate use in children

BACKGROUND

Icodextrin has a lower absorption rate, and icodextrin peritoneal dialysate contributes to more water removal than glucose dialysate in patients with high peritoneal permeability. There are limited data on icodextrin dialysate use in children.

METHODS

This study included all pediatric patients who received peritoneal equilibration tests and peritoneal dialysis with icodextrin dialysate at the study center. The factors related to ultrafiltration volume with icodextrin dialysate with long dwell time were statistically analyzed. Then the ultrafiltration volume with icodextrin and medium-concentration glucose dialysate was compared in individual cycles in the same patients.

RESULTS

Thirty-six samples were included in the icodextrin group, and nine samples were used to compare the ultrafiltration volume with icodextrin and glucose dialysate. Dwell time, D/P-creatinine, D/D₀-glucose, age, height, and weight correlated significantly with the ultrafiltration volume of icodextrin dialysate (p < 0.05). A dwell volume equal to or more than 550 mL/m² was associated with a significantly higher ultrafiltration volume than a lower dwell volume (p = 0.039). Multiple regression analysis revealed that dwell time (p = 0.038) and height (p < 0.01) correlated with ultrafiltration volume significantly. In addition, the ultrafiltration volume was superior (p < 0.01), and dwell time was longer (p = 0.02), with icodextrin dialysate than with medium-concentration glucose dialysate.

CONCLUSIONS

The ultrafiltration volume with icodextrin dialysate decreases in patients with small stature. Providing sufficient dwell time and volume is important for maximal water removal even in children. Ultrafiltration volume is superior with icodextrin than medium-concentration glucose dialysate for long dwell times. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.

Sex Modulates Cardiovascular Effects of Icodextrin-Based Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions

Background/Aims: Some previous observations have noted that after six months of peritoneal dialysis (PD) treatment with icodextrin solutions, blood pressure (BP) and NT-proBNP tend to return to baseline values. This may be due to accumulation of icodextrin products that exert a colloid osmotic effect, which drives water into the bloodstream, causing the rise in blood pressure. Since icodextrin is metabolized by α-Amylase and its gene copies are lower in females than in males, we hypothesized icodextrin metabolites reach higher concentrations in females and that cardiovascular effects of icodextrin are influenced by sex.

Methods: Secondary analysis of a RCT comparing factors influencing fluid balance control in diabetic PD patients with high or high average peritoneal transport receiving icodextrin (n = 30) or glucose (n = 29) PD solutions. Serum icodextrin metabolites, osmolality, body composition and Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) diameter were measured at baseline, and at 6 and 12 months of follow-up.

Results: After six months of treatment, icodextrin metabolites showed higher levels in females than in males, particularly G5-7 and >G7, serum osmolality was lower in females. In spite of reduction in total and extracellular body water, ultrafiltration (UF) was lower and IVC diameter and BP increased in females, suggesting increment of blood volume.

Conclusion: Females undergoing PD present with higher levels of icodextrin metabolites in serum that may exert an increased colloid-osmotic pressure followed by less UF volumes and increment in blood volume and blood pressure. Whether this could be due to the lesser number of α-Amylase gene copies described in diabetic females deserves further investigation.

Traduction des Recommandations de l'ISPD pour l'évaluation du dysfonctionnement de la membrane péritonéale chez l'adulte

Informations concernant cette traductionDans le cadre d’un accord de partenariat entre l’ISPD et le RDPLF, le RDPLF est le traducteur français officiel des recommandations de l’ISPD. La traduction ne donne lieu à aucune compensation financière de la part de chaque société et le RDPLF s’est engagé à traduire fidèlement le texte original sous la responsabilité de deux néphrologues connus pour leur expertise dans le domaine. Avant publication le texte a été soumis à l’accord de l’ISPD. La traduction est disponible sur le site de l’ISPD et dans le Bulletin de la Dialyse à Domicile.Le texte est, comme l’original, libremement téléchargeable sous licence copyright CC By 4.0https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Cette traduction est destinée à aider les professionnels de la communauté francophone à prendre connaissance des recommandations de l’ISPD dans leur langue maternelle. Toute référence dans un article doit se faire au texte original en accès libre :Peritoneal Dialysis International https://doi.org/10.1177/0896860820982218 Dans les articles rédigés pour des revues françaises, conserver la référence à la version originale anglaise ci dessus, mais ajouter «version française  https://doi.org/10.25796/bdd.v4i3.62673"»TraducteursDr Christian Verger, néphrologue, président du RDPLFRDPLF, 30 rue Sere Depoin, 95300 Pontoise – FranceProfesseur Max Dratwa, néphrologueHôpital Universitaire Brugmann – Bruxelles – Belgique

Water removal during automated peritoneal dialysis assessed by remote patient monitoring and modelling of peritoneal tissue hydration

Water removal which is a key treatment goal of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) can be assessed cycle-by-cycle using remote patient monitoring (RPM). We analysed ultrafiltration patterns during night APD following a dry day (APD_DD; no daytime fluid exchange) or wet day (APD_WD; daytime exchange). Ultrafiltration for each APD exchange were recorded for 16 days using RPM in 14 patients. The distributed model of fluid and solute transport was applied to simulate APD and to explore the impact of changes in peritoneal tissue hydration on ultrafiltration. We found lower ultrafiltration (mL, median [first quartile, third quartile]) during first and second vs. consecutive exchanges in APD_DD (−61 [−148, 27], 170 [78, 228] vs. 213 [126, 275] mL; p < 0.001), but not in APD_WD (81 [−8, 176], 81 [−4, 192] vs. 115 [4, 219] mL; NS). Simulations in a virtual patient showed that lower ultrafiltration (by 114 mL) was related to increased peritoneal tissue hydration caused by inflow of 187 mL of water during the first APD_DD exchange. The observed phenomenon of lower ultrafiltration during initial exchanges of dialysis fluid in patients undergoing APD_DD appears to be due to water inflow into the peritoneal tissue, re-establishing a state of increased hydration typical for peritoneal dialysis.

How to Improve the Biocompatibility of Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions (without Jeopardizing the Patient's Health)

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) is an important, if underprescribed, modality for the treatment of patients with end-stage kidney disease. Among the barriers to its wider use are the deleterious effects of currently commercially available glucose-based PD solutions on the morphological integrity and function of the peritoneal membrane due to fibrosis. This is primarily driven by hyperglycaemia due to its effects, through multiple cytokine and transcription factor signalling-and their metabolic sequelae-on the synthesis of collagen and other extracellular membrane components. In this review, we outline these interactions and explore how novel PD solution formulations are aimed at utilizing this knowledge to minimise the complications associated with fibrosis, while maintaining adequate rates of ultrafiltration across the peritoneal membrane and preservation of patient urinary volumes. We discuss the development of a new generation of reduced-glucose PD solutions that employ a variety of osmotically active constituents and highlight the biochemical rationale underlying optimization of oxidative metabolism within the peritoneal membrane. They are aimed at achieving optimal clinical outcomes and improving the whole-body metabolic profile of patients, particularly those who are glucose-intolerant, insulin-resistant, or diabetic, and for whom daily exposure to high doses of glucose is contraindicated.

ISPD recommendations for the evaluation of peritoneal membrane dysfunction in adults: Classification, measurement, interpretation and rationale for intervention

Lay summary

Peritoneal dialysis (PD) uses the peritoneal membrane for dialysis. The peritoneal membrane is a thin layer of tissue that lines the abdomen. The lining is used as a filter to help remove extra fluid and poisonous waste from the blood. Everybody is unique. What is normal for one person’s membrane may be very different from another person’s. The kidney care team wants to provide each person with the best dialysis prescription for them and to do this they must evaluate the person’s peritoneal lining. Sometimes dialysis treatment itself can cause the membrane to change after some years. This means more assessments (evaluations) will be needed to determine whether the person’s peritoneal membrane has changed. Changes in the membrane may require changes to the dialysis prescription. This is needed to achieve the best dialysis outcomes. A key tool for these assessments is the peritoneal equilibration test (PET). It is a simple, standardized and reproducible tool. This tool is used to measure the peritoneal function soon after the start of dialysis. The goal is to understand how well the peritoneal membrane works at the start of dialysis. Later on in treatment, the PET helps to monitor changes in peritoneal function. If there are changes between assessments causing problems, the PET data may explain the cause of the dysfunction. This may be used to change the dialysis prescription to achieve the best outcomes. The most common problem with the peritoneal membrane occurs when fluid is not removed as well as it should be. This happens when toxins (poisons) in the blood cross the membrane more quickly than they should. This is referred to as a fast peritoneal solute transfer rate (PSTR). Since more efficient fluid removal is associated with better outcomes, developing a personal PD prescription based on the person’s PSTR is critically important. A less common problem happens when the membrane fails to work properly (also called membrane dysfunction) because the peritoneal membrane is less efficient, either at the start of treatment or developing after some years. If membrane dysfunction gets worse over time, then this is associated with progressive damage, scarring and thickening of the membrane. This problem can be identified through another change of the PET. It is called reduced ‘sodium dip’. Membrane dysfunction of this type is more difficult to treat and has many implications for the individual. If the damage is major, the person may need to stop PD. They would need to begin haemodialysis treatment (also spelled hemodialysis). This is a very important and emotional decision for individuals with kidney failure. Any decision that involves stopping PD therapy or transitioning to haemodialysis therapy should be made jointly between the clinical team, the person on dialysis and a caregiver, if requested. Although evidence is lacking about how often tests should be performed to determine peritoneal function, it seems reasonable to repeat them whenever there is difficulty in removing the amount of fluid necessary for maintaining the health and well-being of the individual. Whether routine evaluation of membrane function is associated with better outcomes has not been studied. Further research is needed to answer this important question as national policies in many parts of the world and the COVID-19 has placed a greater emphasis and new incentives encouraging the greater adoption of home dialysis therapies, especially PD. For Chinese and Spanish Translation of the Lay Summary, see Online Supplement Appendix 1.

Key recommendations

Guideline 1:

A pathophysiological taxonomy: A pathophysiological classification of membrane dysfunction, which provides mechanistic links to functional characteristics, should be used when prescribing individualized dialysis or when planning modality transfer (e.g. to automated peritoneal dialysis (PD) or haemodialysis) in the context of shared and informed decision-making with the person on PD, taking individual circumstances and treatment goals into account. (practice point)

Guideline 2a:

Identification of fast peritoneal solute transfer rate (PSTR): It is recommended that the PSTR is determined from a 4-h peritoneal equilibration test (PET), using either 2.5%/2.27% or 4.25%/3.86% dextrose/glucose concentration and creatinine as the index solute. (practice point) This should be done early in the course dialysis treatment (between 6 weeks and 12 weeks) (GRADE 1A) and subsequently when clinically indicated. (practice point)

Guideline 2b:

Clinical implications and mitigation of fast solute transfer: A faster PSTR is associated with lower survival on PD. (GRADE 1A) This risk is in part due to the lower ultrafiltration (UF) and increased net fluid reabsorption that occurs when the PSTR is above the average value. The resulting lower net UF can be avoided by shortening glucose-based exchanges, using a polyglucose solution (icodextrin), and/or prescribing higher glucose concentrations. (GRADE 1A) Compared to glucose, use of icodextrin can translate into improved fluid status and fewer episodes of fluid overload. (GRADE 1A) Use of automated PD and icodextrin may mitigate the mortality risk associated with fast PSTR. (practice point)

Guideline 3:

Recognizing low UF capacity: This is easy to measure and a valuable screening test. Insufficient UF should be suspected when either (a) the net UF from a 4-h PET is <400 ml (3.86% glucose/4.25% dextrose) or <100 ml (2.27% glucose /2.5% dextrose), (GRADE 1B) and/or (b) the daily UF is insufficient to maintain adequate fluid status. (practice point) Besides membrane dysfunction, low UF capacity can also result from mechanical problems, leaks or increased fluid absorption across the peritoneal membrane not explained by fast PSTR.

Guideline 4a:

Diagnosing intrinsic membrane dysfunction (manifesting as low osmotic conductance to glucose) as a cause of UF insufficiency: When insufficient UF is suspected, the 4-h PET should be supplemented by measurement of the sodium dip at 1 h using a 3.86% glucose/4.25% dextrose exchange for diagnostic purposes. A sodium dip ≤5 mmol/L and/or a sodium sieving ratio ≤0.03 at 1 h indicates UF insufficiency. (GRADE 2B)

Guideline 4b:

Clinical implications of intrinsic membrane dysfunction (de novo or acquired): in the absence of residual kidney function, this is likely to necessitate the use of hypertonic glucose exchanges and possible transfer to haemodialysis. Acquired membrane injury, especially in the context of prolonged time on treatment, should prompt discussions about the risk of encapsulating peritoneal sclerosis. (practice point)

Guideline 5:

Additional membrane function tests: measures of peritoneal protein loss, intraperitoneal pressure and more complex tests that estimate osmotic conductance and ‘lymphatic’ reabsorption are not recommended for routine clinical practice but remain valuable research methods. (practice point)

Guideline 6:

Socioeconomic considerations: When resource constraints prevent the use of routine tests, consideration of membrane function should still be part of the clinical management and may be inferred from the daily UF in response to the prescription. (practice point)

Injured tissues favor cancer cell implantation via fibrin deposits on scar zones

Aim

Evaluation of fibrin role on cancer cells implantation in injured tissues and studying the molecular mechanism of cancer cell interaction with the peritoneal damage.

Material and methods

Mouse colon cancer (CT26) and human mesothelial cells (HMCs) were used. CT26 cells were implanted on injured peritoneal zones. Icodextrin was used as a lubricant. For in vitro studies, fibrin clots from human plasma were used. The cell-fibrin interaction was observed by optical, electronic, and confocal microscopies. Aprotinin was used as a plasmin inhibitor. Hemostasis impact quantified by (1) the fibrin degradation product D-Dimer and PAR expression in HMCs; (2) the expression of plasminogen activator (PA) and its inhibitor (PAI-1) in cancer cells by qPCR and in supernatants through ELISA after in vitro HMC incubation with 2U of thrombin for 24 h.

Results

(i) Cancer cell lines were adhered and implanted into the wound area in vivo in both the incision and peeling zones of the peritoneum and on the fibrin network in vitro. (ii) Icodextrin significantly inhibited cancer nodule formation in the scar and the incision or peritoneal damaged zones after surgery. (iii) In in vitro studies, cancer cell interaction with the fibrin clot generated a lysed area, causing an increase in plasmin-dependent fibrinolysis measured by D-dimer levels in the supernatants that was inhibited by aprotinin. (iv) Aprotinin inhibited cell-fibrin interaction and invasion. (v) Thrombin upregulates PAI-1 and downregulates PA expression in HMC.

Conclusion

Injured tissues favor cancer cell implantation through generated fibrin. Fibrin-cancer cells adhesion can be inhibited by icodextrin.