Energy Cost of Force Production After a Stretch-Shortening Cycle in Skinned Muscle Fibers: Does Muscle Efficiency Increase?

Force re-development after shortening reveals a role for titin in stretch-shortening performance enhancement in skinned muscle fibres

Stretch-shortening cycles (SSCs) involve muscle lengthening (eccentric contractions) instantly followed by shortening (concentric contractions). This combination enhances force, work and power output compared with pure shortening contractions, which is known as the SSC effect. Recent evidence indicates both cross-bridge (XB)-based and non-XB-based (e.g. titin) structures contribute to this effect. This study analysed force re-development following SSCs and pure shortening contractions to gain further insight into the roles of XB and non-XB structures regarding the SSC effect. Experiments were conducted on rat soleus muscle fibres (n=16) with different SSC velocities (30%, 60% and 85% of maximum shortening velocity) and constant stretch-shortening magnitudes (18% of optimum length). The XB inhibitor blebbistatin was used to distinguish between XB and non-XB contributions to force generation. The results showed SSCs led to significantly greater [mean±s.d. 1.02±0.15 versus 0.68±0.09 (ΔF/Δt); t62=8.61, P<0.001, d=2.79) and faster (75 ms versus 205 ms; t62=-6.37, P<0.001, d=-1.48) force re-development compared with pure shortening contractions in the control treatment. In the blebbistatin treatment, SSCs still resulted in greater [0.11±0.03 versus 0.06±0.01 (ΔF/Δt); t62=8.00, P<0.001, d=2.24) and faster (3010±1631 versus 7916±3230 ms; t62=-8.00, P<0.001, d=-1.92) force re-development compared with pure shortening contractions. These findings deepen our understanding of the SSC effect, underscoring the involvement of non-XB structures such as titin in modulating force production. This modulation is likely to involve complex mechanosensory coupling from stretch to signal transmission during muscle contraction.

Unlocking the benefit of active stretch: the eccentric muscle action, not the preload, maximizes muscle-tendon unit stretch-shortening cycle performance

Stretch-shortening cycles (SSCs) outperform shortening contractions preceded by isometric contractions in terms of enhanced force/torque, work, and power production during shortening. This so-called SSC effect is presumably related to the active muscle stretch before shortening in SSCs. However, it remains unclear whether the effects of stretch-induced higher preload level or stretch-induced history dependence maximize the SSC effect. Therefore, we analyzed fascicle behavior, muscle-tendon unit (MTU) shortening work, and torque/force (n = 12 participants) via ultrasound and dynamometry during electrically stimulated submaximal plantar flexion contractions from 10° plantarflexion to 15° dorsiflexion. To elucidate the effects of preload level and preload modality (i.e., contraction type) on shortening performance, muscle-tendon unit shortening was preceded by fixed-end (SHO), active stretch (SSC), and preload-matched fixed-end (MATCHED) contractions. Before shortening, MATCHED and SCC had the same preload level (1% torque difference), similar joint position, and muscle fascicle lengths. Compared with SHO, shortening work was significantly (P < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.749) increased by 85% and 55% for SSC and MATCHED, respectively, with SSC shortening work being significantly higher than MATCHED (P = 0.016). This indicates that preload contributes by 65% to the overall SSC effect so that 35% needs to be referred to stretched-induced history-dependent mechanisms. In addition, SSC showed larger fascicle forces at the end of shortening (P < 0.001) and 20% less depressed isometric torque following shortening compared with MATCHED (P < 0.001). As potential decoupling effects by the series elastic element were controlled by matching the preload levels, we conclude that the difference between SSC and MATCHED is related to stretch-induced long-lasting history-dependent effects.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Using a torque-matched preload protocol, we found that 2/3 of the performance enhancement in muscle-tendon unit stretch-shortening cycles (SSCs) is caused by the increased preload level. The remaining 1/3 is owed to the long-lasting history-dependent effects triggered during the stretch in SSCs. This increased performance output is attributed to passive elastic structures within the contractile element that do not require additional muscle activation, therefore contributing to the higher efficiency of the neuromuscular system in SSCs.

Association and Agreement between Reactive Strength Index and Reactive Strength Index-Modified Scores

Since the reactive strength index (RSI) and reactive strength index-modified (RSI-mod) share similar nomenclature, they are commonly referred as interchangeable measures of agility in the sports research literature. The RSI and RSI-mod are most commonly derived from the performance of depth jumping (DJ) and countermovement jumping (CMJ), respectively. Given that DJ and CMJ are plyometric movements that differ materially from biomechanical and neuromotor perspectives, it is likely that the RSI and RSI-mod measure distinct aspects of neuromuscular function. The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the association and agreement between RSI and RSI-mod scores. A mixed-sex sample of NCAA division I basketball athletes (n = 21) and active young adults (n = 26) performed three trials of DJ from drop heights of 0.51, 0.66, and 0.81 m and three trials of countermovement jumping. Using 2-dimensional videography and force platform dynamometry, RSI and RSI-mod scores were estimated from DJ and CMJ trials, respectively. Linear regression revealed moderate associations between RSI and RSI-mod scores (F = 11.0–38.1; R² = 0.20–0.47; p < 0.001–0.001). Bland–Altman plots revealed significant measurement bias (0.50–0.57) between RSI and RSI-mod scores. Bland–Altman limit of agreement intervals (1.27–1.51) were greater than the mean values for RSI (0.97–1.05) and RSI-mod (0.42) scores, suggesting poor agreement. Moreover, there were significant performance-dependent effects on measurement bias, wherein the difference between and the mean of RSI and RSI-mod scores were positively associated (F = 77.2–108.4; R² = 0.63–0.71; p < 0.001). The results are evidence that the RSI and RSI-mod cannot be regarded as interchangeable measures of reactive strength.