Effects of a Short-Term Left Ventricular Assist Device on Hemodynamics in a Heart Failure Patient-Specific Aorta Model: A CFD Study

The Effect of Mechanical Circulatory Support on Blood Flow in the Ascending Aorta: A Combined Experimental and Computational Study

Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices are designed for short-term treatment in cases of acute decompensated heart failure as a bridge to transplant or recovery. Some of the known complications of MCS treatments are related to their hemodynamics in the aorta. The current study investigates the effect of MCS on the aortic flow. The study uses combined experimental and numerical methods to delineate complex flow structures. Particle image velocimetry (PIV) is used to capture the vortical and turbulent flow characteristics in a glass model of the human aorta. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analyses are used to complete the 3D flow in the aorta. Three specific MCS configurations are examined: a suction pump with a counterclockwise (CCW) rotating impeller, a suction pump with a clockwise (CW) rotating impeller, and a discharge pump with a straight jet. These models were examined under varying flow rates (1-2.5 L/min). The results show that the pump configuration strongly influences the flow in the thoracic aorta. The rotating impeller of the suction pump induces a dominant swirling flow in the aorta. The swirling flow distributes the incoming jet and reduces the turbulent intensity near the aortic valve and in the aorta. In addition, at high flow rates, the local vortices formed near the pump are washed downstream toward the aortic arch. Specifically, an MCS device with a CCW rotating impeller induces a non-physiological CCW helical flow in the descending aorta (which is opposite to the natural helical flow), while CW swirl combines better with the natural helical flow.

Exploratory Simulation of Thrombosis in a Temporary LVAD Catheter Pump within a Virtual In-vivo Left Heart Environment

Percutaneous catheter pumps are intraventricular temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices that are positioned across the aortic valve into the left ventricle (LV) and provide continuous antegrade blood flow from the LV into the ascending aorta (AA). MCS devices are most often computationally evaluated as isolated devices subject to idealized steady-state blood flow conditions. In clinical practice, MCS devices operate connected to or within diseased pulsatile native hearts and are often complicated by hemocompatibility related adverse events such as stroke, bleeding, and thrombosis. Whereas aspects of the human circulation are increasingly being simulated via computational methods, the precise interplay of pulsatile LV hemodynamics with MCS pump hemocompatibility remains mostly unknown and not well characterized. Technologies are rapidly converging such that next-generation MCS devices will soon be evaluated in virtual physiological environments that increasingly mimic clinical settings. The purpose of this brief communication is to report results and lessons learned from an exploratory CFD simulation of hemodynamics and thrombosis for a catheter pump situated within a virtual in-vivo left heart environment.

Time-resolved simulation of blood flow through left anterior descending coronary artery: effect of varying extent of stenosis on hemodynamics

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Real-time blood flow variation is crucial for understanding the dynamic development of coronary atherosclerosis. The main objective of this study is to investigate the effect of varying extent of stenosis on the hemodynamic features in left anterior descending coronary artery.

METHODS

Various Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models were constructed with patient-specific CT image data, using actual fractional flow reserve (FFR) as boundary conditions to provide a real-time quantitative description of hemodynamic properties. The hemodynamic parameters, such as the local and instantaneous wall shear stress (WSS), oscillating shear index (OSI) and relative residence time (RRT), blood flow velocity and pressure drop during various phases of cardiac cycle were provided in detail.

RESULTS

There was no evident variation in hemodynamic parameters in the cases of less than 50% stenosis while there were abrupt and dramatic changes in hemodynamics when the stenosis aggravated from 60 to 70%. Furthermore, when the stenosis was beyond 70%, there existed substantial pressure difference, WSS, and blood flow velocity in the center of the stenosis. Although OSI and RRT increased along with the aggravation of stenosis, they appeared with obvious abnormalities across all cases, even in mild stenosis.

CONCLUSION

The simulation could present a dynamic and comprehensive profile of how hemodynamic parameters vary in accordance with divergent severities of stenosis, which could serve as an effective reference for the clinicians to have a deeper insight into the pathological mechanism of coronary atherosclerosis and stenosis.