Observational Screening Guidelines and Smartphone Accelerometer Thresholds to Establish the Intensity of Some of the Most Popular Core Stability Exercises

Are trunk stability and endurance determinant factors for whole-body dynamic balance in physically active young males? A multidimensional analysis

OBJECTIVES

Determine if (a) a better trunk stability and endurance are associated with an improved whole-body dynamic balance, and if (b) the assessment tests can be interchanged within each capability.

METHODS

Sixty-three physically active young males performed three trunk stability (i.e., the lumbopelvic stability, the unstable sitting and the sudden loading sitting tests), three trunk muscle endurance (i.e., the Biering-Sørensen, the side bridge and the front bridge tests) and four whole-body dynamic balance (i.e., the tandem and the single-leg stance, the Y-Balance, and the single-leg triple hop tests) tests two times. After assessing the reliability of the variables, a Pearson correlation analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The correlations between trunk stability and endurance tests with dynamic balance tests were non-significant except for the unstable sitting test with both the tandem (r = 0.502) and the single-leg stance (r = 0.522) tests. Moreover, no relationships were observed between the trunk stability and the trunk muscle endurance tests. Interestingly, no relationships were found between most tests within each capability (i.e., trunk stability, trunk endurance, and dynamic balance) except: (i) the front bridge stability test and the back (r = 0.461) and the side (r = 0.499) bridge stability tests; (ii) the two side bridge endurance tests (r = 0.786); (iii) the tandem and the single-leg stance tests (0.439 ≤ r ≤ 0.463); (iv) the Y-Balance and the single-leg triple hop tests (0.446 ≤ r ≤ 0.477).

CONCLUSION

Better trunk function does not seem to be a relevant factor for dynamic balance in young active males. In this population, specific measures are needed as the test interchangeability is questioned.

Exercise Intensity Progressions and Criteria to Prescribe Core Stability Exercises in Young Physically Active Men: A Smartphone Accelerometer-Based Study

ABSTRACT

Heredia-Elvar, JR, Juan-Recio, C, Prat-Luri, A, Barbado, D, Ríos-Calonge, Jdl, and Vera-Garcia, FJ. Exercise intensity progressions and criteria to prescribe core stability exercises in young physically active men: a smartphone accelerometer-based study. J Strength Cond Res 38(2): 266-273, 2024-The establishment of core stability (CS) exercise intensity progressions in sport and clinical settings is normally based on subjective criteria. Therefore, this study aimed to develop exercise intensity progressions for some of the most common CS exercises through smartphone accelerometry and to analyze the effect of the subjects' lumbopelvic postural control on these progressions. Fifty-seven healthy young physically active male students performed 7 isometric variations of front bridge, back bridge, side bridge, and bird-dog exercises with a smartphone accelerometer placed on the pelvis. Mean pelvic accelerations were calculated during each variation to evaluate the lumbopelvic postural control challenge imposed on the subjects as an index of exercise intensity of difficulty. For the bridge exercises, long bridging produced higher pelvic accelerations than short bridging, bridging with single-leg support was more intense than bridging with double-leg support (even with both legs on a hemisphere ball for the back and front bridge), and the most difficult variations were those performed on a Swiss ball, mainly the variations with single-leg support. For the bird-dog exercise, the 2-point positions were more intense than the 3-point positions, the variations performed with a knee on the hemisphere ball produced higher pelvic accelerations than similar variations performed with the forearm on the hemisphere ball, and the variations with limb motions generated higher pelvic accelerations than similar variations performed without limb motions. Although the CS exercise progressions were very similar across subjects, our results showed the need to individualize the prescription of the CS exercise progressions based on the subjects' lumbopelvic postural control level.

Smartphone accelerometry for quantifying core stability and developing exercise training progressions in people with multiple sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Core stability exercise programs have become popular in recent years for preserving balance and functional independence in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS); however, their real impact is not well-known as the main intervention target (i.e., core stability) theoretically responsible for balance or functional improvements is not measured. The objective of this study was to test the reliability of accelerometers integrated into smartphones for quantifying core stability and developing exercise progressions in PwMS.

METHODS

Twenty participants with MS [age: 47.5±8.0 years; height: 1.62±0.07 m; mass: 63.4±10.9 kg; EDSS: 3.0 (1.5-6)] participated voluntarily in this study. CS was assessed in different variations of the front, side, and back bridges and bird-dog exercises by measuring the mean lumbopelvic acceleration in two testing sessions, separated by one week. Relative and absolute reliability of lumbopelvic acceleration of those exercise variations performed by more than 60% of the participants was analyzed by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC_3,1), and the standard error of measurement (SEM) and the minimal detectable change (MDC), respectively. Repeated measures ANOVAs were performed to detect a potential learning effect between test-retest assessments. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Reliability analyses revealed that good to excellent relative and absolute scores (0.85<ICC<0.96; 7.8%≤SEM≤19.2%; 21.6%≤MDC≤53.2%) for the mean lumbopelvic acceleration obtained during 10 of the 12 CS exercise variations performed by more than 60% of the participants. A non-significant between-session learning effect was detected in all the variables considered (all p values >0.05).

CONCLUSION

Smartphone accelerometry seems a low cost, portable and easy-to-use tool to objectively and reliably track core stability changes in PwMS through. However, in spite of the popularity of bridging and bird-dog exercises, only the short and long bridges and the three-point bird-dog positions proved feasible for most participants. Overall, this study provides useful information to evaluate and guide the prescription of core stability exercise programs in PwMS with mild-to-moderate impairment.